ML18139A133: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:LICENSEE .EVENT REPORT ------. ------------*** ------*~----~--... _, ---------*-"-"*-*--~
{{#Wiki_filter:- --- - - . -- --- - -- -   - -     -*** -- ----*~- ---~- - ... _, ---------*-"-"*-*--~
C~NTROL BLOCK: I 1 I
LICENSEE .EVENT REPORT C~NTROL BLOCK:               I 1
* I 10 (PLEASE PRINT OR TY.LL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 6 I v I A I s *IP Is I 2 10l o I o I -I o Io Io I a I a 1-16 la 101 4 I , 11 I 1 Ii 101 I 10 7 8 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 26 LICENSE .TYPE JO 57 CAT 58 CON'T mJJ 7 B L1.1© I ol s I o I o I o I 2 _ I a I 1 101 a I 3 I 2 I a I* s I a 10 L..I __.___,_____._...__......___,10 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION ANO ?ROBABLE CONSEQUENCES  
I*         I 6
@ I An inspection of the Unit 2 containment, following a Type A Leak Rate Test, disclosed* I that eight (8) 1/4 inch holes had been drilled through the containment liner. (The holes I [Q];TI I and other minor construction deficiencies resulted in an unsatisfactory test). This is *~,.reportable in accordance with Technical Specification 6.6.2(a).5.
10                     (PLEASE PRINT     OR TY.LL             REQUIRED INFORMATION)
lTID *@ID [II]] 7 8 9 7 B SYSTEM CODE Is IA I@ 9 10 CAUSE CAUSE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE W@ w@ lvlElslslEILI@
  ~8 I9 v I ALICENSEE 7
11 12 13 18 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE  
I s *IPCODE  Is I 2 1410l15 o I o I - I o Io                 Io Ia Ia 1- 16 la 25101264 I ,LICENSE LICENSE NUMBER 1 Ii JO10157 CAT 11 I.TYPE                                 I 5810 CON'T mJJ 7       B
@ LE R/RO LVENT YEAR REPORT NO. CODE I 8 I O I I I I ci I O I 21 I,...., IO I 11 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 COMP. SUBCOOE w@ 19 REPORT TYPE L!J JO VALVE SUBCODE Lzj@ 20 1=:J 31 ACTION FUTURE TAKEN ACTION EFFECT SHUTDOWN r:;:::,, ATTACHMENT NPRD-4 PRIME COMP. REVISION NO. LQ.J 32 COMPONENT MANUFACTURER 80 ON PLANT METHOD HOURS SUBMITTED FORM SUB. SUPPLIER ~@~@ ~@ ~ I 01010101 W@) ~@-* W@ 33 34 35 36 37 40 41 42 43 I G 12 I 1 I 5 I@) CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @ I During the implementation of Design Change 78-48 holes were drilled through the liner o:IIJ I as a result of improper interpretation of the implementation procedure.
                      ;~~~~~      L1.1© I ol sI oI o I o I 2 _I a I 1 101 a I3 I 2 I aI* s I a 10 L..I__.___,_____._...__......___,10 60           61             DOCKET NUMBER                 68     69         EVENT DATE             74       75       REPORT DATE                         80 EVENT DESCRIPTION ANO ?ROBABLE CONSEQUENCES                                   @
These holes as r:::IJ:TI .I well as other construction deficiencies encountered will be repaired prior to the Type A Retest. 7 8 9 FACILITY '3a' STATUS. %POWER OTHERSTATUS  
I An     inspection of the Unit 2 containment, following a Type A Leak Rate Test, disclosed*
\:::,I [QI) W@ j O ! 0 j O l ..... I _ ____;:.N=A
  ~            I that eight (8) 1/4 inch holes had been drilled through the containment liner.                                                                                           (The holes           I
__ ___, B 9 10 12 11 ACTIVITY CONTENT Q\ RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY [IE] LlJ @) u.1(§ I NA 7 8 9 . 10 11 7 44 44 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES Q\ METHOD OF DISCOVERY w@I Inspection 45 46 NA 45 DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION following Leak Rate Test LOCATl~N OF RELEASE @ 47 80 80 80 NUMBER ~-TYPE DESCRIPTION [iI?J j O ! 0 j O lW@L....-
[Q];TI I and other minor construction deficiencies resulted in an unsatisfactory test).                                                                                                   This is
_______ __.:;N~A _______________
*~,.reportable in accordance with Technical Specification 6.6.2(a).5.
,-....1 8 9 11 12 13 PERSONNEL INJURIES Q NUMBER DESCRIPTION~ 01 01 oj@)
lTID
* 7 a 9 11 .._12---------~-----------------------------_.ao 80 NA LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY '4J' TYPE DESCRIPTION Lz.J@ ... NA B 9 10 80 PUBLICITY . 1J.,J2_ 'J . / ISSUEDQDESCRIPTION~
*@ID
_1 Q ~. NRC USE ONLY .., }TI] LNJ~ .... l _____________
[II]]
N_A=S...;;C""""0_4_0_S_o
7       8 9                                                                                                                                                                                                 80 SYSTEM               CAUSE         CAUSE                                                           COMP.            VALVE CODE                CODE         SUBCODE                   COMPONENT CODE                       SUBCOOE            SUBCODE
___ ___.l I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! 8 9 10 . 68 69 80 ; (804) 357-3184 NAME OF PREPARER ___ J_._L_._W_i_l_s_o_n_~----------
~B 7
PHONE: 0 II. "
Is IA I@ W@ w@ lvlElslslEILI@
e ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 of 1 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO: 50-281 REPORT NO: 80-002/0lT-O EVENT DATE: 3-20-80 TITLE OF REPORT: CONTAINMENT LINER HOLES 1. Description of Event:
9          10          11             12               13                               18 w@
* An inspection of the Unit 2 containment, following a Type A Leak Rate Test, disclosed that eight (8) 1/4 inch holes had been drilled through the containment liner~ This event is ]:'.eportable in accordance with Technical Specification 6.6.2(a).5.
19 Lzj@
: 2. Probable Consequence and Status of Redundant Systems: These holes and other minor construction deficiencies contributed to an unsatisfactory Type A Leak Rate Test. Since Unit No. 2 is in a shutdown and defueled condition the health and safety of the general public were not affected.
20 SEQUENTIAL                             OCCURRENCE             REPORT                                  REVISION LE R/RO LVENT YEAR                                     REPORT NO.                                 CODE                 TYPE                                        NO.
: 3. Cause: During the implementation of Design Change 78-48 to install RTD's in the containment, holes were drilled through the liner as a result of improper interpretation of the implementation procedure.
              @ N~~~~~ I 8 I OI                              I I           I ci I OI 21               I,....,         IO I     11             L!J            1=:J                      LQ.J 21         22         23             24               26         27             28       29           JO               31                       32 ACTION       FUTURE               EFFECT         SHUTDOWN                             r:;:::,, ATTACHMENT           NPRD-4         PRIME COMP.                           COMPONENT TAKEN        ACTION              ON PLANT           METHOD                     HOURS ~            SUBMITTED       FORM SUB.           SUPPLIER                       MANUFACTURER
: 4. Innnediate Corrective Actions: The problem was referred to the Architect Engineer to generate a procedure to repair the holes. 5. Subsequent Corrective Actions: The procedure has been received by the station and repair to all the holes will be completed prior .to recommencement of the Type A Test. Repair of the other minor construction deficiencies impacting on the Type A Test will also be completed prior to conducting the Test. 6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:
              ~@~@
33            34
                                                ~@
35
                                                                    ~
36 I
37 01010101 40 W@)
41
                                                                                                                                      ~@-*
42 W@
43 I G 12 I 1 I 5 I@)
47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS                             @
I During           the implementation of Design Change 78-48 holes were drilled through the liner o:IIJ I as             a result of improper interpretation of the implementation procedure.                                                                             These holes as r:::IJ:TI .I     well as other construction deficiencies encountered will be repaired prior to the Type A Retest.
7       8   9                                                                                                                                                                                             80 FACILITY STATUS.               %POWER                         OTHERSTATUS
                                                                                    '3a'
                                                                                    \:::,I METHOD OF DISCOVERY                                DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION
[QI) 7        B  9 W@               j 10
                                    !
O 0     j   O 12 lI....._
11
____;:.N=A_ ____,                 w@I            Inspection following Leak Rate Test 44    45            46                                                                                          80 ACTIVITY         CONTENT                                               Q\
RELEASED OF RELEASE                           AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY                                                             LOCATl~N OF RELEASE              @
[IE]
7      8 LlJ 9      .
                      @) u.1(§10 I11                        NA 45 NA 44                                                                                                               80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES                                 Q\
NUMBER           ~-TYPE             DESCRIPTION ~
[iI?J j           O !   0   j O lW@L....-_________.:;N~A_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,-....1 8   9                   11     12           13                                                                                                                                                   80 PERSONNEL INJURIES                     Q NUMBER                 DESCRIPTION~
~                              oj@)
* NA 7       a   9 01      01 11     .._12---------~-----------------------------_.ao LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY               '4J' TYPE         DESCRIPTION                   ~
~            Lz.J@                                   ...                                             NA B   9             10                                                                                                                                                                               80 PUBLICITY                 ~                                                                                . 1J.,J2_ 'J . /
ISSUEDQDESCRIPTION~                                                                                                 _ Q ~.                                 NRC USE ONLY                             ..,
}TI]         LNJ~l...._____________N_A=S...;;C""""0_4_0_S_o_1_ ____.l                                                                                         I I I I I I I I I I I I I!
8   9             10                     .                                                                                                   68   69                                             80 ;
(804)           357-3184                                   0 NAME OF PREPARER _ _ _                J_._L_._W_i_l_s_o_n_~----------                                     PHONE:                                                                       II.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    "
 
e ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 of 1 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2
* DOCKET NO: 50-281 REPORT NO: 80-002/0lT-O EVENT DATE: 3-20-80 TITLE OF REPORT: CONTAINMENT LINER HOLES
: 1. Description of Event:
An inspection of the Unit 2 containment, following a Type A Leak Rate Test, disclosed that eight (8) 1/4 inch holes had been drilled through the containment liner~ This event is ]:'.eportable in accordance with Technical Specification 6.6.2(a).5.
: 2. Probable Consequence and Status of Redundant Systems:
These holes and other minor construction deficiencies contributed to an unsatisfactory Type A Leak Rate Test. Since Unit No. 2 is in a shutdown and defueled condition the health and safety of the general public were not affected.
: 3. Cause:
During the implementation of Design Change 78-48 to install RTD's in the containment, holes were drilled through the liner as a result of improper interpretation of the implementation procedure.
: 4. Innnediate Corrective Actions:
The problem was referred to the Architect Engineer to generate a procedure to repair the holes.
: 5. Subsequent Corrective Actions:
The procedure has been received by the station and repair to all the holes will be completed prior .to recommencement of the Type A Test. Repair of the other minor construction deficiencies impacting on the Type A Test will also be completed prior to conducting the Test.
: 6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:
Construction personnel have been reinstructed on the intent of the working procedures to insure they understand and do not perform any work not specifically covered in the procedure.
Construction personnel have been reinstructed on the intent of the working procedures to insure they understand and do not perform any work not specifically covered in the procedure.
: 7. Generic Implications:
: 7. Generic Implications:
None}}
None}}

Revision as of 03:44, 21 October 2019

LER 80-002/01T-0:on 800320,insp of Containment Following Type a Leak Rate Revealed Eight 1/4 Inch Holders Drilled Through Containment Liner.Caused by Improper Interpretation of Procedure During Design Change 78-48.Repair Planned
ML18139A133
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/1980
From: Joshua Wilson
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18139A132 List:
References
LER-80-002-01T-01, LER-80-2-1T-1, NUDOCS 8004080482
Download: ML18139A133 (2)


Text

- --- - - . -- --- - -- - - - -*** -- ----*~- ---~- - ... _, ---------*-"-"*-*--~

LICENSEE .EVENT REPORT C~NTROL BLOCK: I 1

I* I 6

10 (PLEASE PRINT OR TY.LL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

~8 I9 v I ALICENSEE 7

I s *IPCODE Is I 2 1410l15 o I o I - I o Io Io Ia Ia 1- 16 la 25101264 I ,LICENSE LICENSE NUMBER 1 Ii JO10157 CAT 11 I.TYPE I 5810 CON'T mJJ 7 B

~~~~~ L1.1© I ol sI oI o I o I 2 _I a I 1 101 a I3 I 2 I aI* s I a 10 L..I__.___,_____._...__......___,10 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION ANO ?ROBABLE CONSEQUENCES @

I An inspection of the Unit 2 containment, following a Type A Leak Rate Test, disclosed*

~ I that eight (8) 1/4 inch holes had been drilled through the containment liner. (The holes I

[Q];TI I and other minor construction deficiencies resulted in an unsatisfactory test). This is

lTID

  • @ID

[II]]

7 8 9 80 SYSTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUBCOOE SUBCODE

~B 7

Is IA I@ W@ w@ lvlElslslEILI@

9 10 11 12 13 18 w@

19 Lzj@

20 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION LE R/RO LVENT YEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE NO.

@ N~~~~~ I 8 I OI I I I ci I OI 21 I,...., IO I 11 L!J 1=:J LQ.J 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 JO 31 32 ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN r:;:::,, ATTACHMENT NPRD-4 PRIME COMP. COMPONENT TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD HOURS ~ SUBMITTED FORM SUB. SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER

~@~@

33 34

~@

35

~

36 I

37 01010101 40 W@)

41

~@-*

42 W@

43 I G 12 I 1 I 5 I@)

47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @

I During the implementation of Design Change 78-48 holes were drilled through the liner o:IIJ I as a result of improper interpretation of the implementation procedure. These holes as r:::IJ:TI .I well as other construction deficiencies encountered will be repaired prior to the Type A Retest.

7 8 9 80 FACILITY STATUS. %POWER OTHERSTATUS

'3a'

\:::,I METHOD OF DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION

[QI) 7 B 9 W@ j 10

!

O 0 j O 12 lI....._

11

____;:.N=A_ ____, w@I Inspection following Leak Rate Test 44 45 46 80 ACTIVITY CONTENT Q\

RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATl~N OF RELEASE @

[IE]

7 8 LlJ 9 .

@) u.1(§10 I11 NA 45 NA 44 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES Q\

NUMBER ~-TYPE DESCRIPTION ~

[iI?J j O ! 0 j O lW@L....-_________.:;N~A_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,-....1 8 9 11 12 13 80 PERSONNEL INJURIES Q NUMBER DESCRIPTION~

~ oj@)

  • NA 7 a 9 01 01 11 .._12---------~-----------------------------_.ao LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY '4J' TYPE DESCRIPTION ~

~ Lz.J@ ... NA B 9 10 80 PUBLICITY ~ . 1J.,J2_ 'J . /

ISSUEDQDESCRIPTION~ _ Q ~. NRC USE ONLY ..,

}TI] LNJ~l...._____________N_A=S...;;C""""0_4_0_S_o_1_ ____.l I I I I I I I I I I I I I!

8 9 10 . 68 69 80 ;

(804) 357-3184 0 NAME OF PREPARER _ _ _ J_._L_._W_i_l_s_o_n_~---------- PHONE: II.

"

e ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 of 1 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2

  • DOCKET NO: 50-281 REPORT NO: 80-002/0lT-O EVENT DATE: 3-20-80 TITLE OF REPORT: CONTAINMENT LINER HOLES
1. Description of Event:

An inspection of the Unit 2 containment, following a Type A Leak Rate Test, disclosed that eight (8) 1/4 inch holes had been drilled through the containment liner~ This event is ]:'.eportable in accordance with Technical Specification 6.6.2(a).5.

2. Probable Consequence and Status of Redundant Systems:

These holes and other minor construction deficiencies contributed to an unsatisfactory Type A Leak Rate Test. Since Unit No. 2 is in a shutdown and defueled condition the health and safety of the general public were not affected.

3. Cause:

During the implementation of Design Change 78-48 to install RTD's in the containment, holes were drilled through the liner as a result of improper interpretation of the implementation procedure.

4. Innnediate Corrective Actions:

The problem was referred to the Architect Engineer to generate a procedure to repair the holes.

5. Subsequent Corrective Actions:

The procedure has been received by the station and repair to all the holes will be completed prior .to recommencement of the Type A Test. Repair of the other minor construction deficiencies impacting on the Type A Test will also be completed prior to conducting the Test.

6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:

Construction personnel have been reinstructed on the intent of the working procedures to insure they understand and do not perform any work not specifically covered in the procedure.

7. Generic Implications:

None