ML17208A948: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000250/1979035]]
{{Adams
| number = ML17208A948
| issue date = 07/30/1980
| title = Suppl to 800501 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/79-35,50-251/79-35,50-335/79-33 & 50-389/79-22. Corrective Actions:Procedures Revised & Training Sessions Conducted.Compliance to Be Achieved by 800731
| author name = Uhrig R
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name = Oreilly J
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| docket = 05000250, 05000251, 05000335, 05000389
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = L-80-242, NUDOCS 8008280316
| package number = ML17208A947
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000250/1979035]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O.BOX 52S100 MIAMI, F I.33152 USNRC REC!3V::.0 tLAiRTA Gf.I.""':":I'LORIOA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY Mr.James P.O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection
and Enforcement
U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr.O'Reilly: Re: RII.VLB 50-250/79-35
50-251/79-35
50-335/79-33
50-389/79-22
July 30, 1980 L-80-242 This letter supplements
Florida Power&Light Company's letter of May 1, 1980 (L-80-135)
in response to the subject inspection
report.In that letter we indicated that procedures
would be revised, training conducted, and full com-pliance will be achieved by July 31, 1980.To date, the corporate quality procedure for compliance
to 10 CFR 21'as been revised and re-issued.
Training review sessions have also been conducted at each of FPL's nuclear plant sites and the corporate procedure is implemented.
Accordingly, the intent of our original objective for July 31 has been achieved.However, in the process of developing
the revised corporate procedure and the training, many individuals
who now must be knowledgeable
in 10 CFR 21 asked for more specific instructions, particularly
relating to the correlation
of factors pertinent to the question of what is and is not a"substantial
safety hazard".In the preamble to 10 CFR 21, the Commission
itself recognizes
that more experience
is needed before these factors can be precisely identifed.
Therefore we forsee that additional
instruction
development
and training may be required as experience
in the application
of 10 CFR 21 is gained.Very trul yours, ert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology
REU/AES/bt
soosmso3(Q
8.IPI'ICIAI, 5p""'EOPLE...
SERVING PEOPLE
i
}}

Revision as of 10:43, 19 June 2019

Suppl to 800501 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/79-35,50-251/79-35,50-335/79-33 & 50-389/79-22. Corrective Actions:Procedures Revised & Training Sessions Conducted.Compliance to Be Achieved by 800731
ML17208A948
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie, Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/30/1980
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML17208A947 List:
References
L-80-242, NUDOCS 8008280316
Download: ML17208A948 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000250/1979035

Text

P.O.BOX 52S100 MIAMI, F I.33152 USNRC REC!3V::.0 tLAiRTA Gf.I.""':":I'LORIOA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY Mr.James P.O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection

and Enforcement

U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr.O'Reilly: Re: RII.VLB 50-250/79-35

50-251/79-35

50-335/79-33

50-389/79-22

July 30, 1980 L-80-242 This letter supplements

Florida Power&Light Company's letter of May 1, 1980 (L-80-135)

in response to the subject inspection

report.In that letter we indicated that procedures

would be revised, training conducted, and full com-pliance will be achieved by July 31, 1980.To date, the corporate quality procedure for compliance

to 10 CFR 21'as been revised and re-issued.

Training review sessions have also been conducted at each of FPL's nuclear plant sites and the corporate procedure is implemented.

Accordingly, the intent of our original objective for July 31 has been achieved.However, in the process of developing

the revised corporate procedure and the training, many individuals

who now must be knowledgeable

in 10 CFR 21 asked for more specific instructions, particularly

relating to the correlation

of factors pertinent to the question of what is and is not a"substantial

safety hazard".In the preamble to 10 CFR 21, the Commission

itself recognizes

that more experience

is needed before these factors can be precisely identifed.

Therefore we forsee that additional

instruction

development

and training may be required as experience

in the application

of 10 CFR 21 is gained.Very trul yours, ert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology

REU/AES/bt

soosmso3(Q

8.IPI'ICIAI, 5p""'EOPLE...

SERVING PEOPLE

i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17208A948&oldid=1700502"