ML12038A129: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:D& FOIA Resource From: Wilson, George I Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:56 PM To: Li, Yong | {{#Wiki_filter:D& FOIA Resource From: Wilson, George I Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:56 PM To: Li, Yong | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: here's the story I mentioned Thanks Sent from nrc blackberry From: Li, Yong To: Wilson, George Cc: Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal Sent: Wed Aug 24 17:44:47 2011 | Re: here's the story I mentioned Thanks Sent from nrc blackberry From: Li, Yong To: Wilson, George Cc: Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal Sent: Wed Aug 24 17:44:47 2011 | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: here's the story I mentioned It is not correct.The design of an NPP is based on postulated ground motion acceleration (Safe Shutdown Earthquake ground motion), which captures both maximum earthquake magnitude and the distance from the epicenter to the site. It is not a simple correlation between ground acceleration and earthquake magnitude (Richter scale).From: Wilson, George Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:31 PM To: Li, Yong; Munson, Clifford; Kammerer, Annie | RE: here's the story I mentioned It is not correct. | ||
The design of an NPP is based on postulated ground motion acceleration (Safe Shutdown Earthquake ground motion), which captures both maximum earthquake magnitude and the distance from the epicenter to the site. It is not a simple correlation between ground acceleration and earthquake magnitude (Richter scale). | |||
From: Wilson, George Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:31 PM To: Li, Yong; Munson, Clifford; Kammerer, Annie | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: here's the story I mentioned Please follow the email and respond I know what the dbe is but not the correlation to the Richter scale. Please respond to me the correlation of richter to g scale From: Hayden, Elizabeth CA Sent: Wednesday,.August24, 2011 2:58 PM To: McGinty, Tim; Wilson, George Cc: Kammerer, Annie; Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal; Burnell, Scott; Couret, Ivonne; Harrington, Holly; McIntyre, David; Stuckle, Elizabeth | FW: here's the story I mentioned Please follow the email and respond I know what the dbe is but not the correlation to the Richter scale. Please respond to me the correlation of richter to g scale From: Hayden, Elizabeth CA Sent: Wednesday,.August24, 2011 2:58 PM To: McGinty, Tim; Wilson, George Cc: Kammerer, Annie; Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal; Burnell, Scott; Couret, Ivonne; Harrington, Holly; McIntyre, David; Stuckle, Elizabeth | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: here's the story I mentioned Thanks.Beth Hayden | RE: here's the story I mentioned Thanks. | ||
-- | Beth Hayden SeniorAdvisor Office of Public Affairs US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
-- a//ec/i*gPeap/e a'id/kvnJi'rw'm'uu 301-415-8202 elizabeth.hqden@nrc.gov information in this record was deleted in accordance with tpe Freedom of Information Act, exemptions __ | |||
@nrc.gov information in this record was deleted in accordance with tpe Freedom of Information Act, exemptions | F01A L( -m 5 | ||
Fropi: McGinty, Tim Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 2:55 PM To: Hayden, Elizabeth; Wilson, George Cc: Kammerer, Annie; Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: here's the story I mentioned | Re: here's the story I mentioned Iwill ask George Wilson to get back to you. | ||
Sent from my NRC blackberry From: Hayden, Elizabeth To: McGinty, Tim Cc: Kammerer, Annie Sent: Wed Aug 24 14:38:21 2011 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: here's the story I mentioned Tim, Can anyone tell me if this information being reported by DowJones is correct?The rock part of the site is built to withstand 0.12g--equivalent to a magnitude-5.9 quake. The soil part of the site, meanwhile, is built to withstand 0.1 8g--or a magnitude-6.2 quake.Beth Hayden From: Margaret Rn ()(6)Sent: Wednesday, st 24, 2011 1:14 PM To: Hayden, Elizabeth | RE: here's the story I mentioned Tim, Can anyone tell me if this information being reported by DowJones is correct? | ||
The rock part of the site is built to withstand 0.12g--equivalent to a magnitude-5.9 quake. The soil part of the site, meanwhile, is built to withstand 0.1 8g--or a magnitude-6.2 quake. | |||
Beth Hayden From: Margaret Rn ()(6) | |||
Sent: Wednesday, st 24, 2011 1:14 PM To: Hayden, Elizabeth | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
here's the story i mentioned http://www.nasdaq.comlaspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=20 11 0824 ! 227dowi onesdi onlineOOO I 5 &title=dominion-analyzing-ciuake-readiness-of-north-anna-nuclear-plant Margaret L. Ryan Energy Journalist and Analyst AOL Energy, http://energy.aol.com/"What Got Left Out," http://margaretrya.posterous.com (b)(6) 1 2}} | here's the story i mentioned http://www.nasdaq.comlaspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=20 11 0824 ! 227dowi onesdi onlineOOO I 5&title=dominion-analyzing-ciuake-readiness-of-north-anna-nuclear-plant Margaret L. Ryan Energy Journalist and Analyst AOL Energy, http://energy.aol.com/ | ||
"What Got Left Out," http://margaretrya.posterous.com (b)(6) 1 2}} |
Latest revision as of 09:42, 12 November 2019
ML12038A129 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | North Anna |
Issue date: | 08/24/2011 |
From: | George Wilson Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
To: | Yueh-Li Li NRC/NRR/DE/EMCB |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2011-0357 | |
Download: ML12038A129 (2) | |
Text
D& FOIA Resource From: Wilson, George I Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:56 PM To: Li, Yong
Subject:
Re: here's the story I mentioned Thanks Sent from nrc blackberry From: Li, Yong To: Wilson, George Cc: Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal Sent: Wed Aug 24 17:44:47 2011
Subject:
RE: here's the story I mentioned It is not correct.
The design of an NPP is based on postulated ground motion acceleration (Safe Shutdown Earthquake ground motion), which captures both maximum earthquake magnitude and the distance from the epicenter to the site. It is not a simple correlation between ground acceleration and earthquake magnitude (Richter scale).
From: Wilson, George Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:31 PM To: Li, Yong; Munson, Clifford; Kammerer, Annie
Subject:
FW: here's the story I mentioned Please follow the email and respond I know what the dbe is but not the correlation to the Richter scale. Please respond to me the correlation of richter to g scale From: Hayden, Elizabeth CA Sent: Wednesday,.August24, 2011 2:58 PM To: McGinty, Tim; Wilson, George Cc: Kammerer, Annie; Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal; Burnell, Scott; Couret, Ivonne; Harrington, Holly; McIntyre, David; Stuckle, Elizabeth
Subject:
RE: here's the story I mentioned Thanks.
Beth Hayden SeniorAdvisor Office of Public Affairs US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-- a//ec/i*gPeap/e a'id/kvnJi'rw'm'uu 301-415-8202 elizabeth.hqden@nrc.gov information in this record was deleted in accordance with tpe Freedom of Information Act, exemptions __
F01A L( -m 5
Fropi: McGinty, Tim Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 2:55 PM To: Hayden, Elizabeth; Wilson, George Cc: Kammerer, Annie; Khanna, Meena; Manoly, Kamal
Subject:
Re: here's the story I mentioned Iwill ask George Wilson to get back to you.
Sent from my NRC blackberry From: Hayden, Elizabeth To: McGinty, Tim Cc: Kammerer, Annie Sent: Wed Aug 24 14:38:21 2011
Subject:
RE: here's the story I mentioned Tim, Can anyone tell me if this information being reported by DowJones is correct?
The rock part of the site is built to withstand 0.12g--equivalent to a magnitude-5.9 quake. The soil part of the site, meanwhile, is built to withstand 0.1 8g--or a magnitude-6.2 quake.
Beth Hayden From: Margaret Rn ()(6)
Sent: Wednesday, st 24, 2011 1:14 PM To: Hayden, Elizabeth
Subject:
here's the story i mentioned http://www.nasdaq.comlaspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=20 11 0824 ! 227dowi onesdi onlineOOO I 5&title=dominion-analyzing-ciuake-readiness-of-north-anna-nuclear-plant Margaret L. Ryan Energy Journalist and Analyst AOL Energy, http://energy.aol.com/
"What Got Left Out," http://margaretrya.posterous.com (b)(6) 1 2