ML17264A592: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:cezsUORY REGUL ORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9609130042 DOC.DATE: 96/09/05 NOTARIZED: | {{#Wiki_filter:cezsUORY REGUL ORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (RIDS) | ||
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.T. | ACCESSION NBR:9609130042 DOC.DATE: 96/09/05 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.T. Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp. | ||
Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.MECREDY,R.C. | MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas S Electric Corp. | ||
Rochester Gas S Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSING,G.S. | RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSING,G.S. | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
LER 96-010-00:on 960806,Latching main turbine while in mode 4 occurred,due to defective procedure, resulting in automatic start of auxiliary feedwater pump.Caused by defective maint procedure. | LER 96-010-00:on 960806,Latching main turbine while in mode 4 occurred,due to defective procedure, resulting in automatic start of auxiliary feedwater pump. Caused by defective maint procedure. Procedure revised.W/960905 ltr. | ||
Procedure revised.W/960905 ltr.DZSTRZBUTZON CODE: ZE22T COPZES RECEZVED:LTR I ENCL 3 SZZE: TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc, NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). | DZSTRZBUTZON CODE: ZE22T COPZES RECEZVED:LTR I ENCL 3 SZZE: | ||
05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 PD INTERNAL'~ | TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc, NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCI ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCI PD1-1 PD 1 1 VISSING,G. 1 1 INTERNAL'~ 2 2 AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 ILE CENTER 1 1 NRR/DE/ECGB 1 1 NRR D ELB 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HQMB 1 1 NRR/DRPM/PECB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 D NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LITCO BRYCE,J H 2 2 NOAC MURPHYiG.A 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 N | ||
ILE CENTER NRR D ELB NRR/ | NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS: | ||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM OWFN 5D-5(EXT. 415"2083) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED! | |||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM OWFN 5D-5(EXT.415"2083)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 25 ROCHESTERGASANDEIECTRICCORPORATION | FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 25 | ||
+89EASTAVfNUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.Id6d9.000I AREA CODE 7I6 Sd6.2TOO ROBERT C.MECREDY Vice Presioeos Nvc.'eor Ooe~ol.'ooS September 5, 1996 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy S.Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C.20555 | |||
ROCHESTERGASANDEIECTRICCORPORATION + 89EASTAVfNUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. Id6d9.000I AREA CODE 7I6 Sd6.2TOO ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice Presioeos Nvc.'eor Ooe~ol.'ooS September 5, 1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy S. Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
LER 96-010, Latching Main Turbine While in Mode 4, Due to Defective Procedure, Results in Automatic Start of Auxiliary Feedwater Pump R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-244 | LER 96-010, Latching Main Turbine While in Mode 4, Due to Defective Procedure, Results in Automatic Start of Auxiliary Feedwater Pump R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 | ||
==Dear Mr. Vissing:== | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (iv), which requires a report of, "Any event or condition that resulted in a manual or automatic actuation of any engineered safety feature (ESF), including the reactor protection system (RPS)", the attached Licensee Event Report LER 96-010 is hereby submitted. | |||
This event has in no way affected the public's health and safety. | |||
Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy xc: Mr. Guy S. Vissing (Mail Stop 14C7) | |||
PWR Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555 J | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector | |||
'ssb0'Pi30042 9b0905 PDR ADOCK 05000244 PDR | |||
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150%104 (4-95) EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE To COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK To INDUSTRY. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE To THE (See reverse for required number of INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IT.B F33), | |||
digits/characters for each block) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND To THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT FACIUTY NAME (1) DOCKET )IVMSBI(3) PAGE (3) | |||
POWER | R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 1 OF 6 TITLE (4) | ||
(1)20.2203(a)( | Latching Main Turbine While in Mode 4, Due to Defective Procedure, Results in Automatic Start of Auxiliary Feedwater Pump EVENT DATE (6) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOI.VED (8) | ||
(2)( | FAOILITYNAME DOCKET NUMBER SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 08 06 96 96 010 00 09 05 96 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PUR SUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR E: (Check one or morel (11) | ||
(3)( | MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2) (v) 50.73(a) (2) (i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | ||
( | POWER 20.2203(a) (1) 20.2203(a) (3) (i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) | ||
(4)50. | LEVEL (10) 000 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a) (3)(ii) 50.73(a) (2) (iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a) (4) X 50.73(a)(2)(iv) OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a) (2) (v) Specrfy m Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a) (2) (iv) 50.36(c) (2) 50.73(a) (2) (vii) | ||
As part of completion of a corrective maintenance activity, the main turbine was latched per a Maintenance procedure. | LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) | ||
Since the circuit breakers for both main feedwater pumps were already open, this created logic for an autostart of the"A" motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pump.Immediate action was to secure the"A" auxiliary feedwater pump and stabilize auxiliary feedwater flow to both steam generators. | TELEPHONE NVM8SR (Irctvde Area Code) | ||
John T. St. Martin - Technical Assistant (716) 771-3641 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DES CRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) | |||
CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER To NPRDS CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER To NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED YES SUBMISSION (If yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). X NO DATE (16) | |||
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16'. | |||
On August 6, 1996, at approximately 1315 EDST, the plant was in Mode 4 with the reactor coolant system being maintained at a temperature of 340 degrees F and a pressurizer pressure of 350 PSIG with a steam bubble in the pressurizer. As part of completion of a corrective maintenance activity, the main turbine was latched per a Maintenance procedure. Since the circuit breakers for both main feedwater pumps were already open, this created logic for an autostart of the "A" motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pump. | |||
Immediate action was to secure the "A" auxiliary feedwater pump and stabilize auxiliary feedwater flow to both steam generators. | |||
The underlying cause of the autostart was that the logic for autostart was created by latching the turbine, due to a defective Maintenance procedure. | The underlying cause of the autostart was that the logic for autostart was created by latching the turbine, due to a defective Maintenance procedure. | ||
This event is NUREG-1022 Cause Code (D).Corrective action to prevent recurrence is outlined in Section V.B.NRC FORM 366 (4. | This event is NUREG-1022 Cause Code (D). | ||
Corrective action to prevent recurrence is outlined in Section V.B. | |||
NRC FORM 366 (4.95) | |||
NRC | NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4.95) | ||
This event was immediately apparent when the"A" AFW pump autostarted after the turbine was latched.OPERATOR ACTION'he Control Room operator followed the direction of procedure M-109 and latched the turbine.After the"A" AFW pump autostarted, the Control Room operators took prompt actions to minimize any RCS coo!down and control AFW flow.They promptly secured the"A" AFW pump.The Control Room operators subsequently notified higher supervision and notified the NRC per 10CFR50.72 (b)(2)(ii), non-emergency four hour notification, at approximately 1600 EDST on August 6, 1996.G.SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES: | LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | ||
The"A" AFW pump autostarted as per design due to the main turbine being latched while both MFW pump breakers were open.The"B" AFW pump also received an autostart signal, but was already operating. | TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) | ||
III.CAUSE OF EVENT: A. | YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 2 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT Iifmore spaceis required, use edditionel copies of NRC Form 366AI (17) | ||
PRE-EVENT PLANT CONDITIONS: | |||
On August 6, 1996, the plant was in Mode 4 as a result of a voluntary plant shutdown to upgrade motor-operated valves in the residual heat removal (RHR) system. During this shutdown an opportunity was identified by an Instrument and Control (l&C) planner to complete a corrective maintenance activity on main turbine control valve CV-2. The reactor coolant system (RCS) was being maintained at a temperature of approximately 340 degrees F and a pressurizer (PRZR) pressure of approximately 350 PSIG with a steam bubble in the PRZR. The "B" motor-driven auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump was operating to maintain water inventory in both steam generators (S/G), and the "A" motor-driven AFW pump was not operating. | |||
II. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: | |||
A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES'ugust 6, 1996, 1315 EDST: The main turbine is latched. | |||
August 6, 1996, 1315 EDST: Event date and time. | |||
August 6, 1996, 1315 EDST: Discovery date and time. | |||
August 6, 1996, 1316 EDST: The second running AFW pump is secured. | |||
B. EVENT: | |||
On August 6, 1996, at approximately 1315 EDST, the plant was in Mode 4. I&C technicians were preparing to calibrate main turbine control valve CV-2, to complete a previously initiated corrective maintenance activity on this valve. I&C technicians requested the Control Room operators to latch the main turbine per Maintenance Procedure M-109 ("A" EH Governor High Pressure Fluid System Adjustment, Calibration and Maintenance). This is done to supply EH pressure to the control valves in order to stroke them. A Control Room operator latched the turbine as directed by procedure M-109. Both main feedwater (MFW) pump breakers were open. With this condition and the turbine latched, an autostart signal was supplied to both motor-driven AFW pumps, which caused an autostart of the "A" AFW pump. At this time the "B" AFW pump also received an autostart signal, but was already operating. | |||
The Control Room operators observed the autostart of the "A" AFW pump and promptly secured the "A" AFW pump to minimize an expected cooldown of the reactor coolant system (RCS). AFW flow was controlled at the desired flow rate for Mode 4 conditions. During the time two AFW pumps were operating, there was a slight cooldown of the RCS of approximately three (3) degrees F. | |||
NRC FORM 366A (4-95) | |||
NRC F RM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) | |||
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 3 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT llfmore spaceis required, use edditionel copies of NRC Form 366Al (17) | |||
C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS, OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT: | |||
None D. OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED: | |||
None E. METHOD OF DISCOVERY: | |||
This event was immediately apparent when the "A" AFW pump autostarted after the turbine was latched. | |||
OPERATOR ACTION'he Control Room operator followed the direction of procedure M-109 and latched the turbine. | |||
After the "A" AFW pump autostarted, the Control Room operators took prompt actions to minimize any RCS coo!down and control AFW flow. They promptly secured the "A" AFW pump. | |||
The Control Room operators subsequently notified higher supervision and notified the NRC per 10CFR50.72 (b) (2) (ii), non-emergency four hour notification, at approximately 1600 EDST on August 6, 1996. | |||
G. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES: | |||
The "A" AFW pump autostarted as per design due to the main turbine being latched while both MFW pump breakers were open. The "B" AFW pump also received an autostart signal, but was already operating. | |||
III. CAUSE OF EVENT: | |||
A. IMMEDIATECAUSE: | |||
The immediate cause of the autostart of the "A" AFW pump was latching the main turbine with both MFW pump breakers open. | |||
B. INTERMEDIATE CAUSE: | |||
The intermediate cause of latching the main turbine,was compliance with procedure M-109, which had technical inaccuracies and was not the correct procedure to be used in this plant condition. | |||
NAC FOAM 366A (4-95) | NAC FOAM 366A (4-95) | ||
NRC FORM 366A I4-S5)LXCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION | |||
This event is NUREG-1022 Cause Code (D),"Defective Procedure". | NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I4-S5) | ||
Three causal factors were identified by the HPES.One of the causal factors is Written Communications (technical inaccuracies). | LXCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | ||
The second causal factor is Work Organization and Planning (job scoping did not identify special circumstances/conditions and work planning was not coordinated with all departments involved in the task) | TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET LER NUMBER I6) PAGE I3) | ||
There were no operational or safety consequences or implications attributed to the autostart of the"A" AFW pump because: o The autostart of the"A" AFW pump occurred with the"8" AFW pump already operating and with acceptable levels in both S/Gs.AFW flow was controlled to maintain these levels.The"A" AFW pump was promptly secured to minimize any RCS cooldown.The limiting case for the supply of AFW is the Loss of Feedwater accident at 100%power.The plant condition at the time of this event was Mode 4 with feedwater being supplied by the"B" AFW pump.NRC FORM 366A (4-65) | YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 4 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT (Ifmore speceis required, use eddirional copies of NRC Form 368AI l17) | ||
NRC FORM 366A I4-95)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION | C. ROOT CAUSE: | ||
o An RCS cooldown from this condition would add minimal positive reactivity. | A Human Performance Enhancement System (HPES) evaluation was initiated because of this event. The HPES evaluation concluded that the underlying cause of the autostart of the "A" AFW pump was that procedure M-109 was a defective procedure. This event is NUREG-1022 Cause Code (D), "Defective Procedure". | ||
It is estimated that the isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC)is less negative than-1 pcm per degree F, and a major cooldown (from 340 degrees F to 212 degrees F)would add less than 128 pcm of positive reactivity. | Three causal factors were identified by the HPES. One of the causal factors is Written Communications (technical inaccuracies). The second causal factor is Work Organization and Planning (job scoping did not identify special circumstances/conditions and work planning was not coordinated with all departments involved in the task) The third causal factor is Work Practices | ||
An excess boron concentration of only 12 to 13 PPM will compensate for this much reactivity. | ~ | ||
Thus, a potential cooldown of the RCS would not present a safety issue.Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times.V.CORRECTIVE ACTION: A.ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS: o AFW flow was controlled as desired to maintain S/G level.o The"A" AFW pump was promptly secured to minimize any RCS cooldown.B.ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE: | (general equipment condition not checked before starting work and self-checking not applied to ensure intended action is correct). | ||
The autostart of the AFW pump does not meet the NUMARC 93-01, "Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants", definition of a "Maintenance Preventable Functional Failure". | |||
IV. ANALYSIS OF EVENT: | |||
This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (iv), | |||
which requires a report of, "Any event or condition that resulted in a manual or automatic actuation of any engineered safety feature (ESF), including the reactor protection system (RPS)". The start of an AFW pump is an actuation of an ESF. | |||
An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and implications of this event with the following results and conclusions: | |||
There were no operational or safety consequences or implications attributed to the autostart of the "A" AFW pump because: | |||
o The autostart of the "A" AFW pump occurred with the "8" AFW pump already operating and with acceptable levels in both S/Gs. AFW flow was controlled to maintain these levels. | |||
The "A" AFW pump was promptly secured to minimize any RCS cooldown. | |||
The limiting case for the supply of AFW is the Loss of Feedwater accident at 100% power. | |||
The plant condition at the time of this event was Mode 4 with feedwater being supplied by the "B" AFW pump. | |||
NRC FORM 366A (4-65) | |||
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I4-95) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET LER NUMBER I6) PAGE I3) | |||
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 5 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT (Ifmore spaceis required, use addirional copies of NRC Form 386AJ l17) o When the turbine is latched, the main turbine stop valves open and the main turbine control valves remain closed. With the MSIV bypass valves open, the only potential cooldown path through the turbine is leakage past the control valves. The amount of leakage was not sufficient to roll the turbine off the turning gear, and would not cause a major cooldown unless the control valves are subsequently opened. | |||
Normal operating procedures require boration to the cold shutdown boron concentration (boron concentration to ensure a shutdown margin (SDM) of 2.45% at 70 degrees F) prior to cooling down below 500 degrees F. During this event, RCS boron concentration was in excess of the 2.45% shutdown margin level by approximately 150 parts per million (PPM). Also note that the required boron concentration corresponding to the 2.45% SDM limit has an additional 100 PPM conservative allowance included. Thus, an RCS cooldown in this condition would not have challenged SDM requirements, nor would the reactor approach criticality. | |||
o An RCS cooldown from this condition would add minimal positive reactivity. It is estimated that the isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) is less negative than -1 pcm per degree F, and a major cooldown (from 340 degrees F to 212 degrees F) would add less than 128 pcm of positive reactivity. An excess boron concentration of only 12 to 13 PPM will compensate for this much reactivity. Thus, a potential cooldown of the RCS would not present a safety issue. | |||
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times. | |||
V. CORRECTIVE ACTION: | |||
A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS: | |||
o AFW flow was controlled as desired to maintain S/G level. | |||
o The "A" AFW pump was promptly secured to minimize any RCS cooldown. | |||
B. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE: | |||
Procedure M-109 will be revised to ensure that latching of the main turbine is properly controlled and AFW pump concerns are addressed. | Procedure M-109 will be revised to ensure that latching of the main turbine is properly controlled and AFW pump concerns are addressed. | ||
Expectations will be reviewed with operators. | Expectations will be reviewed with operators. Emphasis will be placed on fully understanding work plans and maintaining a questioning attitude throughout the pre-job briefing. | ||
Emphasis will be placed on fully understanding work plans and maintaining a questioning attitude throughout the pre-job briefing.NRC FORM 366A I4-95) | NRC FORM 366A I4-95) | ||
NRG FORM 366A (4-95)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION | |||
A.FAILED COMPONENTS: | NRG FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95) | ||
None B.PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS: A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause could be identified. | LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | ||
However, LERs 96-004 and 96-008 are similar events with different root causes.C.SPECIAL COMMENTS: None NAC FOAM 366A<4-95)}} | TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (I) DOCKET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3) | ||
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 6 OF 6 96 010 00 TEXT ilfmore spaceis required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A j (17) | |||
VI. ADDITIONALINFORMATION: | |||
A. FAILED COMPONENTS: | |||
None B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS: | |||
A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause could be identified. However, LERs 96-004 and 96-008 are similar events with different root causes. | |||
C. SPECIAL COMMENTS: | |||
None NAC FOAM 366A <4-95)}} |
Latest revision as of 18:04, 29 October 2019
ML17264A592 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Ginna ![]() |
Issue date: | 09/05/1996 |
From: | Martin J, Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
To: | Vissing G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
LER-96-010, LER-96-10, NUDOCS 9609130042 | |
Download: ML17264A592 (9) | |
Text
cezsUORY REGUL ORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9609130042 DOC.DATE: 96/09/05 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.T. Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.
MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas S Electric Corp.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSING,G.S.
SUBJECT:
LER 96-010-00:on 960806,Latching main turbine while in mode 4 occurred,due to defective procedure, resulting in automatic start of auxiliary feedwater pump. Caused by defective maint procedure. Procedure revised.W/960905 ltr.
DZSTRZBUTZON CODE: ZE22T COPZES RECEZVED:LTR I ENCL 3 SZZE:
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc, NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCI ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCI PD1-1 PD 1 1 VISSING,G. 1 1 INTERNAL'~ 2 2 AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 ILE CENTER 1 1 NRR/DE/ECGB 1 1 NRR D ELB 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HQMB 1 1 NRR/DRPM/PECB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 D NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LITCO BRYCE,J H 2 2 NOAC MURPHYiG.A 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 N
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM OWFN 5D-5(EXT. 415"2083) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 25
ROCHESTERGASANDEIECTRICCORPORATION + 89EASTAVfNUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. Id6d9.000I AREA CODE 7I6 Sd6.2TOO ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice Presioeos Nvc.'eor Ooe~ol.'ooS September 5, 1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy S. Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
LER 96-010, Latching Main Turbine While in Mode 4, Due to Defective Procedure, Results in Automatic Start of Auxiliary Feedwater Pump R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244
Dear Mr. Vissing:
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (iv), which requires a report of, "Any event or condition that resulted in a manual or automatic actuation of any engineered safety feature (ESF), including the reactor protection system (RPS)", the attached Licensee Event Report LER 96-010 is hereby submitted.
This event has in no way affected the public's health and safety.
Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy xc: Mr. Guy S. Vissing (Mail Stop 14C7)
PWR Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555 J
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector
'ssb0'Pi30042 9b0905 PDR ADOCK 05000244 PDR
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150%104 (4-95) EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE To COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK To INDUSTRY. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE To THE (See reverse for required number of INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IT.B F33),
digits/characters for each block) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND To THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT FACIUTY NAME (1) DOCKET )IVMSBI(3) PAGE (3)
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 1 OF 6 TITLE (4)
Latching Main Turbine While in Mode 4, Due to Defective Procedure, Results in Automatic Start of Auxiliary Feedwater Pump EVENT DATE (6) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOI.VED (8)
FAOILITYNAME DOCKET NUMBER SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 08 06 96 96 010 00 09 05 96 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PUR SUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR E: (Check one or morel (11)
MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2) (v) 50.73(a) (2) (i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
POWER 20.2203(a) (1) 20.2203(a) (3) (i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)
LEVEL (10) 000 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a) (3)(ii) 50.73(a) (2) (iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a) (4) X 50.73(a)(2)(iv) OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a) (2) (v) Specrfy m Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a) (2) (iv) 50.36(c) (2) 50.73(a) (2) (vii)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
TELEPHONE NVM8SR (Irctvde Area Code)
John T. St. Martin - Technical Assistant (716) 771-3641 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DES CRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER To NPRDS CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER To NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED YES SUBMISSION (If yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). X NO DATE (16)
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16'.
On August 6, 1996, at approximately 1315 EDST, the plant was in Mode 4 with the reactor coolant system being maintained at a temperature of 340 degrees F and a pressurizer pressure of 350 PSIG with a steam bubble in the pressurizer. As part of completion of a corrective maintenance activity, the main turbine was latched per a Maintenance procedure. Since the circuit breakers for both main feedwater pumps were already open, this created logic for an autostart of the "A" motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pump.
Immediate action was to secure the "A" auxiliary feedwater pump and stabilize auxiliary feedwater flow to both steam generators.
The underlying cause of the autostart was that the logic for autostart was created by latching the turbine, due to a defective Maintenance procedure.
This event is NUREG-1022 Cause Code (D).
Corrective action to prevent recurrence is outlined in Section V.B.
NRC FORM 366 (4.95)
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4.95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 2 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT Iifmore spaceis required, use edditionel copies of NRC Form 366AI (17)
PRE-EVENT PLANT CONDITIONS:
On August 6, 1996, the plant was in Mode 4 as a result of a voluntary plant shutdown to upgrade motor-operated valves in the residual heat removal (RHR) system. During this shutdown an opportunity was identified by an Instrument and Control (l&C) planner to complete a corrective maintenance activity on main turbine control valve CV-2. The reactor coolant system (RCS) was being maintained at a temperature of approximately 340 degrees F and a pressurizer (PRZR) pressure of approximately 350 PSIG with a steam bubble in the PRZR. The "B" motor-driven auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump was operating to maintain water inventory in both steam generators (S/G), and the "A" motor-driven AFW pump was not operating.
II. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:
A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES'ugust 6, 1996, 1315 EDST: The main turbine is latched.
August 6, 1996, 1315 EDST: Event date and time.
August 6, 1996, 1315 EDST: Discovery date and time.
August 6, 1996, 1316 EDST: The second running AFW pump is secured.
B. EVENT:
On August 6, 1996, at approximately 1315 EDST, the plant was in Mode 4. I&C technicians were preparing to calibrate main turbine control valve CV-2, to complete a previously initiated corrective maintenance activity on this valve. I&C technicians requested the Control Room operators to latch the main turbine per Maintenance Procedure M-109 ("A" EH Governor High Pressure Fluid System Adjustment, Calibration and Maintenance). This is done to supply EH pressure to the control valves in order to stroke them. A Control Room operator latched the turbine as directed by procedure M-109. Both main feedwater (MFW) pump breakers were open. With this condition and the turbine latched, an autostart signal was supplied to both motor-driven AFW pumps, which caused an autostart of the "A" AFW pump. At this time the "B" AFW pump also received an autostart signal, but was already operating.
The Control Room operators observed the autostart of the "A" AFW pump and promptly secured the "A" AFW pump to minimize an expected cooldown of the reactor coolant system (RCS). AFW flow was controlled at the desired flow rate for Mode 4 conditions. During the time two AFW pumps were operating, there was a slight cooldown of the RCS of approximately three (3) degrees F.
NRC FORM 366A (4-95)
NRC F RM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 3 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT llfmore spaceis required, use edditionel copies of NRC Form 366Al (17)
C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS, OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT:
None D. OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED:
None E. METHOD OF DISCOVERY:
This event was immediately apparent when the "A" AFW pump autostarted after the turbine was latched.
OPERATOR ACTION'he Control Room operator followed the direction of procedure M-109 and latched the turbine.
After the "A" AFW pump autostarted, the Control Room operators took prompt actions to minimize any RCS coo!down and control AFW flow. They promptly secured the "A" AFW pump.
The Control Room operators subsequently notified higher supervision and notified the NRC per 10CFR50.72 (b) (2) (ii), non-emergency four hour notification, at approximately 1600 EDST on August 6, 1996.
G. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:
The "A" AFW pump autostarted as per design due to the main turbine being latched while both MFW pump breakers were open. The "B" AFW pump also received an autostart signal, but was already operating.
III. CAUSE OF EVENT:
A. IMMEDIATECAUSE:
The immediate cause of the autostart of the "A" AFW pump was latching the main turbine with both MFW pump breakers open.
B. INTERMEDIATE CAUSE:
The intermediate cause of latching the main turbine,was compliance with procedure M-109, which had technical inaccuracies and was not the correct procedure to be used in this plant condition.
NAC FOAM 366A (4-95)
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I4-S5)
LXCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET LER NUMBER I6) PAGE I3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 4 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT (Ifmore speceis required, use eddirional copies of NRC Form 368AI l17)
C. ROOT CAUSE:
A Human Performance Enhancement System (HPES) evaluation was initiated because of this event. The HPES evaluation concluded that the underlying cause of the autostart of the "A" AFW pump was that procedure M-109 was a defective procedure. This event is NUREG-1022 Cause Code (D), "Defective Procedure".
Three causal factors were identified by the HPES. One of the causal factors is Written Communications (technical inaccuracies). The second causal factor is Work Organization and Planning (job scoping did not identify special circumstances/conditions and work planning was not coordinated with all departments involved in the task) The third causal factor is Work Practices
~
(general equipment condition not checked before starting work and self-checking not applied to ensure intended action is correct).
The autostart of the AFW pump does not meet the NUMARC 93-01, "Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants", definition of a "Maintenance Preventable Functional Failure".
IV. ANALYSIS OF EVENT:
This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (iv),
which requires a report of, "Any event or condition that resulted in a manual or automatic actuation of any engineered safety feature (ESF), including the reactor protection system (RPS)". The start of an AFW pump is an actuation of an ESF.
An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and implications of this event with the following results and conclusions:
There were no operational or safety consequences or implications attributed to the autostart of the "A" AFW pump because:
o The autostart of the "A" AFW pump occurred with the "8" AFW pump already operating and with acceptable levels in both S/Gs. AFW flow was controlled to maintain these levels.
The "A" AFW pump was promptly secured to minimize any RCS cooldown.
The limiting case for the supply of AFW is the Loss of Feedwater accident at 100% power.
The plant condition at the time of this event was Mode 4 with feedwater being supplied by the "B" AFW pump.
NRC FORM 366A (4-65)
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET LER NUMBER I6) PAGE I3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 5 OF 6 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 96 010 00 TEXT (Ifmore spaceis required, use addirional copies of NRC Form 386AJ l17) o When the turbine is latched, the main turbine stop valves open and the main turbine control valves remain closed. With the MSIV bypass valves open, the only potential cooldown path through the turbine is leakage past the control valves. The amount of leakage was not sufficient to roll the turbine off the turning gear, and would not cause a major cooldown unless the control valves are subsequently opened.
Normal operating procedures require boration to the cold shutdown boron concentration (boron concentration to ensure a shutdown margin (SDM) of 2.45% at 70 degrees F) prior to cooling down below 500 degrees F. During this event, RCS boron concentration was in excess of the 2.45% shutdown margin level by approximately 150 parts per million (PPM). Also note that the required boron concentration corresponding to the 2.45% SDM limit has an additional 100 PPM conservative allowance included. Thus, an RCS cooldown in this condition would not have challenged SDM requirements, nor would the reactor approach criticality.
o An RCS cooldown from this condition would add minimal positive reactivity. It is estimated that the isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) is less negative than -1 pcm per degree F, and a major cooldown (from 340 degrees F to 212 degrees F) would add less than 128 pcm of positive reactivity. An excess boron concentration of only 12 to 13 PPM will compensate for this much reactivity. Thus, a potential cooldown of the RCS would not present a safety issue.
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times.
V. CORRECTIVE ACTION:
A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS:
o AFW flow was controlled as desired to maintain S/G level.
o The "A" AFW pump was promptly secured to minimize any RCS cooldown.
B. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
Procedure M-109 will be revised to ensure that latching of the main turbine is properly controlled and AFW pump concerns are addressed.
Expectations will be reviewed with operators. Emphasis will be placed on fully understanding work plans and maintaining a questioning attitude throughout the pre-job briefing.
NRC FORM 366A I4-95)
NRG FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (I) DOCKET LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 6 OF 6 96 010 00 TEXT ilfmore spaceis required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A j (17)
VI. ADDITIONALINFORMATION:
A. FAILED COMPONENTS:
None B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS:
A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause could be identified. However, LERs96-004 and 96-008 are similar events with different root causes.
C. SPECIAL COMMENTS:
None NAC FOAM 366A <4-95)