ML12201A263

2012 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Proposed Exam Files

ML12201A263
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	04/23/2012
From:	Palagi B NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Shared Package
ML11354A187	List: ML12082A224 ML12083A151 ML12083A183 ML12083A184 ML12083A186 ML12083A187 ML12201A263
References
Download: ML12201A263 (21)

Text

2012 QUAD CITIES POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAM FILES

Exelon Generation Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Nuclear 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, IL 61242 -9740 SVP-12-016 March 5, 2012 Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265

Subject:

Submittal of Integrated Initial License Training Examination Materials

References:

1) Letter from U. S. NRC (Hironori Peterson, Region III) to Michael J. Pacilio (Exelon Generation Company, LLC), "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Confirmation of Initial License Examination," dated January 13, 2012

2) Letter from Tim Hanley (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to u. S. NRC (Regional Administrator, Region III), "Submittal of Initial Operator Licensing Examination Outlines," dated February 2, 2012 Enclosed are the examination materials that support the Initial License Examination scheduled for the weeks of April 23, 2012 and April 30, 2012 at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station.

This submittal includes the Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) Written Examinations, Job Performance Measures, and Integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides.

These examination materials have been developed in accordance with NUREG-1021 ,

"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9 (Supplement 1).

Please note that reference materials are attached to each individual examination question or item.

There have been no modifications to the Integrated Examination Outline with regards to the written and operating examinations.

Some modifications or adjustments to the examination material may be required due to procedural changes.

In accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9 (Supplement 1), Section ES-201, please ensure that these materials are withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.

MAR 5 2012

March 5, 2012 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Wally J. Beck, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (309)-227-2800. For questions concerning examination material, please contact Christopher J. Burkhart at (309)-227-4057.

Respectfully,

~ ~a'-n-'~~:;"""-c..--<7'\

Site Vice President Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

Enclosures:

(Hand delivered to Bruce Palagi, Chief Examiner, NRC Region III)

RO/SRO Composite Examination (with references attached)

Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Job Performance Measures (with references attached)

Administrative Topic Job Performance Measures (with references attached)

Integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides Completed Checklists:

Operating Test Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-3)

Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-4)

Transient and Event Checklist (Form ES-301-5)

Competencies Checklist (Form ES-301-6)

Written Examination Quality Checklist (Form ES-401-6)

Examination Security Agreements (Form ES-201-3)

Record of Rejected KlAs (Form ES-401-4) cc: Chief, Operations Branch - NRC Region III (w/o enclosures)

NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (w/o enclosures)

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 I Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 0412312012 Operating Test Number: ILT10-1 Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). q b If

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. --

q b ~

c. The operatinQ test shall not du!>,-icate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 4 (l) H/

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. 4 6> (f!

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a!)plicants at the designated license level. ~ 6 e(J

2. Walk-lhrough Criteria -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: ~

• • initial conditions initiating cues 6 &1 references and tools, including aSSOCiated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detai/ed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other exam iner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., ,item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified I

.y b~

on those forms and Form ES-201 -2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co~ is attached. I'~ ~ if Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Author Christooher Burkhart r- ~ - ") tK/1L/-~L~

b. Facility Reviewer(*) TerlY. Gallentine c../£.../... ~ ,L?tL"~

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Bruce Palaai 6,.:-... 12. ~~W /fI" f/I z..

d. NRC Supervisor ~ r/lq/rz. Cht:; ,./es tJh,/[tPs  !:f)~~ 1l yJUl!. 0/.J/IZ NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

I n

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c ; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: Quad Cities Date of Exam : 04/2312012 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: ILT10-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. /J-f b ell

2. l'he scenarios consist mostly of related events. q (t) f!iJ

3. Each event description consists of tj

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated 1('0 the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew Bf

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. f!> h @f I

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~ (t) ,af

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

q b ~.

qr D~

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. q, ;1) IN.>

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

(/

b ~f

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0 .5 of ES-301. ,

• L!> Bf

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). <J b et

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified' on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

4 b 16f

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. if 1') f.R Target Quantitative Attributes (Per ScenariO; See Section D_S.d) Actual Attributes -- - -

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5/5/8/7 Ii A lAP 1

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (F2) 2/2/2/1 tij (b ~p

3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4/3/4/4 I if I {~) ~

4. Major transients (1-2) 1/1/1/1 (~ @L

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/1/2/2 '*

(j I,) (3f

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0/1/1/1 4 lb ee

7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2/3/3/2 ~ A ~

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 04/23/2012 Exam Level: RO~SRO~

I Initial Item Description a bO c*

~.

1.

2.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

a. NAC KJAs are referenced for all questions.

~ b

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. ~ 6 Pf

3. SAO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4 {\J Itl!£ I

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 AO or 2 SAO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exam. consult the NRR OL program office) . 6f I

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

Iq

, 2L the au~jjt exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_ the examinations were developed independently; or b ff

_ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_ other (explain)

I

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent I Bank I Modified New from the bank. at least 10 percent new. and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only ~ I --taRo ~ ~ 6 .61 question distribution(s) at right.

n/'t 1 lo/S tfa./,

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension /analysis level; I 8.

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KAs support the higher cognitive leve'ls; enter the actual RO I SAO question distribution(s) at right.

Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers

~

33/ t,

....4 ~ 29 ..

4J. / / 1 4

tb eP or aid in the elimination of distractors. 4 Lb ~fJ

9. Question content conforms with specific KJA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified 4 b ff

, ~)

10. Question psychometric quality and *format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. ~ ~

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point. multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet 4 I') If Printed Name I Signature Date

~~ . t2wg!a

a. Author Christooher Burkhart

~

b. Facility Reviewer (0) Terrv Gallentine (' IL)/ ~ ~z.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NAC Aegional Supervisor j)y",,,e., fq/a'f; ~.-A.-'

../t3I,Q/i1. C~A"'~'> P~~{(dJ~

~/

(?)7; (l v:I",Yd ~!fi/ZZ. ~ (

I Note: ° The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

~ f/ q Co-. -I-oG-t~ (riM KoIb) If (.-t;'j br4""t.. t ~;e ~ .

~Jr#e.J cr ,l< ",ho. 4. Gc.t(t-,'Io/(. ~,..,.t... 5" ref""+- 1IAer.-h o:.!.

()... (r.P G.,t"'...,.....  ;'1"" ,e,.. 54 ""'f l, "'j fi"1>> c.e.S.5 ...,..S' Y'~ .. ,)o iA.""J $y5 r.-... J,'*(.....

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-301 Transient and Event checklist Form ES-301-5 2012 NRC Exam Crew A Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 04/23/12 Operating Test Number: ILT 10-1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 P E T M L N CREW OREW CREW CREW a I I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N A I C

A T S A B S A B S A B S A B L M N Y R T a A T 0 R T a I R T a u T P a c P 0 C P a c P a c P M(*)

E R I U I

RO I RX 5 1 1 I

181* 1 NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I I/C 5 34 26 5 4 0

SRO-U MAJ 6 6 I 7 3 2 0 TS I 0 0 RX 3 5 5 3 1 0

10SRO-I NOR 1 1 2 1 I/C 245 27 246 8 4 1811 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 10 TS 2 36 3 2 RX 3 5 2 1 RO ,

0 ,NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I 2 34 I/C 24 4 7 4 1812 7 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 0

TS 135 3 2 Instructions:

1. Check the afBlicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event tYfae; are not a~licable !~r RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (A~9)"

and "ba ance-of-rlant (B P)" positions. Instant SROs must serve In both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at leas two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC rcosition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited oward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivi~ manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to 2.

Section .5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. P Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component ma unctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's com~etence count toward the mimmum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in he right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 2012 NRC Exam Crew B Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 04/23/12 Operating Test Number: ILT 10-1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 P

T M E

L N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N C A I A T S A B S A B S A B S A B L M N Y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 U T P 0 C P 0 c P 0 C P 0 C P I M(*)

E R I U I

RO RX 5 1 1 1 SRO-I

~' 2 2 NOR 1 1 1 IIC 5 3 26 4 4 0

SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 0 0 TS 0 RO RX 3 2 5 3 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I IIC 245 48 246 8 4

~3 SRO-U IMAJ 6 6 7 3 2 o I TS I 2 36 3 2 RO RX 3 2 2 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I

~4 IIC 24 348 4 6 4 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 0

1 TS 45 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the B:pglicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event tyfae; are not a~licable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "ba ance-of-~Iant (B P)" positions. ,Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at leas , two instrument or component (I/G) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC fc0sition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited oward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. I Reactivi~ manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to 2.

Section .5.d) but must be Significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. P Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component mal unctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's ,Iicense level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event checklist Form ES-301-5 2012 NRC Exam Crew C Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 04/23112 Operating Test Number: ILT 10-1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 P E T M L N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N C A I A T S A B S A I B S A B S A B L M N Y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 U T P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)

E R I U RO RX 5 1 1 1813 NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I IIC 5 3 27 4 4 0

SRO-U IMAJ 1 6 6 6 3 2 0 ITS 0 0 RX 3 2 5 3 1 RO 0 NOR 1 1 I 1 2 1 SRO-I 234 1815 IIC 245 48 7 9 4 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 , 6 3 2 10 1 TS 2 135 4 2 RO RX 3 2 2 1 01 NOR 1 I 1 2 1 SRO-I IIC 24 348 34 7 4 181' 6 1 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 6 3 2 0 TS 45 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the a-f~licant level' and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event tyrae; are not a~licable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and Mba ance-of-plant (B P)" pOSitions. Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC

~osition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP pOSition, one IIC malfunction can be credited oward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivi~ manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to 2.

Section .5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. P Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced With additional instrument or component mal unctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event checklist Form ES-301-5 2012 NRC Exam Crew D Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 04/23112 Operating Test Number: ILT 10-1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 P E T M L N CREW CREW CREW CREW a I I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N C A I A T S A B S A B S A B S A B L M N Y R T 0 R T a R T a R T a u T P Q C P a c P a c P a c P M(*)

E R I U I

.RO RX 5 1 1 11814 NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I I/C 3 34 26 5 4 0

SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 0 TS , 0 0 RX u 2 5 5 3 1 RO 0 NOR 1 I 1

I 1 2 1 SRO-I I/C 348 27 246 8 4 1817 SRO-U IMAJ 6 6 7 3 2 0 TS 45 36 I 4 2 I

RX I" 2 5 2 1 RO 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 SRO-I 234 I/C 48 4 7 4 1818 7 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 7 3 2 0

TS 135 I 3 2 Instructions:

1. Check the afElicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event tYFae; are not a~licable for HO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "ba ance-of-plant (B P)" positions. Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC

~osition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited oward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivi~ manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section .5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. P Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component mal unctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 CREW A Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 4/23/12 NRC Operating Test No.: ILT 10-1 APPLICANTS RO 1~ RO D RO D RO 0 Competencies SRO-I D SRO-I 1 ~ SRO-I 2[8] SRO-I 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 10 SRO-U 0 SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 POSITION BOP BOP ATC SRO ATCliSRO ATC SRO IBOP 12 1 3 25 ~~

67 I 56 Interpret! Diagnose 15 25 ~~ 23 34 1 4 67 46 67 56 46 Events and Conditions 8 8 8 78 7 56 178 7 78 Comply With and Use 15 1 1 3 25 ~~

46 67 56 67 ~~

25 23 46 1~ 1 14 Procedures (1) 67 8 8 8 78 56 7 56 78 7 78 15 1 3 25 25 23 14 Operate Control 46 67 67 46

,67 8 8 8 7 78 Boards (2) I Communicate 15 1 3 25 ~~

46 67 56 25 ~~ 23 67 56. 46 ~~ 14 and ,I nteract 67 8 8 8 78 7 56 78 7 78 Demonstrate ~~ ~~ ~~

Supervisory Ability (3) 56 56 56 7 78 78 Comply With and 2 36 13 Use Tech Specs. (3) 5 Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 C.R EWB

,I Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 4/23/12 NRC Operating Test No.: ILT 10-1 APPLICANTS RO 2~ RO 0 RO 0 RO 0 Competencies SRO-I D SRO-I 3~ SRO-I 4~ SRQ-l o .

SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRQ-U 0 SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 I

POSITION BOP BOP ATC SRo l[ATC SRO ATC SRO BOP Interpret! Diagnose 15 13 67 ~~ 67 25 24 ~~ 23 46 ~~ 14 Events and Conditions 67 67 56 8 56 7 56 78 8 i 7 78 1 78 Comply With and Use 15 13 25 '

67 56 ~~ 6724 ~~ 23 ~~ 14 Procedures (1) 67 67 8 56 46 56 78 8 7 78 I 7 78 25 24 23 Operate Control 15 13 67 46 14 67 67 67 78 Boards (2) 8 8 7 Communicate 15 13 25 67 56 ~~ 2467 1~ 23 46 ~~ 14 and Interact 67 67 8 56 7 56 78 I 8 7 78 78 Demonstrate ~~ ~~ ~~

Supervisory Ability (3) 56 56 56 7 78 78 Comply With and 2 36 45 Use Tech Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SAO-U.

1(3) Only applicable to SAOs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 CREWC Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 4/23/12 NRC Operating Test No.: ILT 10-1 APPLICANTS RO 3~ RO D RO D RO 0 Competencies SRO-I D SRO-I 5~ SRO-I 6 ~ SRO-I 0 SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U 0 ,'. , ' .

SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 l' 2 3 4 1 2 3 4.

POSITII ON BOP BOP ATC SRO ATC I SRO ATC SRO BOP 12 13 Interpret! Diagnose 1 5 1 3 25 ~~ 24 ~~ 23 34 46 Events and Conditions 67 67 67 8 56 67 8 56 46 7 56 8 7 78 1 78 12 13

~~ 6724 34 12 Comply With and Use 1 5 1 3 25 23 46 34 46 Procedures (1) 67 67 67 8 56 8 56 7 56 8 7 78 78 1 5 1 3 25 24 23 13 Operate Control 67 46 46 67 67 67 8 8 7 8 Boards (2)

Communicate 15 67 67 1 3 2567 ~~ 24 ~~

67 56 8 56 23 11 46 56 46 13 and Interact 8 7 78 7 78 8 Demonstrate ~~ ~~ ~~

Supervisory Ability (3) 56 56 56 7 78 78 Comply With and 2 13 45 5

Use Tech Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301' Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 CREWD Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 4/23/12 NRC Operating Test No.: ILT 10-1 APPLICANTS RO 4~ RO D RO D RO 0 Competencies SRO-I D SRO-I 7~ SRO-I 8 ~ SRQ-I 0 SRO-U D I SRO-U D SRO-U D SAO-U 0 SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3. 4 POSITION BOP BOP ATC SRO ATC SRO ATC SRO BOP 12 Interpret! Diagnose 1 3 461 3 125

' 67 ~~ 25 1U 67 56 24 67 34 1 4 I Events and Conditions 67 8 8 56 1 8 56 78 78 8 78 78 12 '12 24 12 Comply With and Use 1 3 1 3 25 34 25 67 34 67 34 1 4 Procedures (1) 67 46 67 8 8 56 8 56 8 56 78 78 78 78 13 13 25 25 24 14 Operate Control 67 Boards (2) 67 46 8 67 8

67 8 8 78 12 12 Communicate 1 3 4613 25 1~ 25 34 24 67 34 1 4 67 8 67 56 67 56 8 56 78 and Interact 8 78 8 78 78 Demonstrate 1~ 1~ 1~

Supervisory Ability (3) 56 56 56 78 78 78 Comply With and 45 36 13 5

Use Tech, Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

E8-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 2012 NRC EXAM RO Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA TIER 1 Group 1 T1/G1 295023 2.4.11 Generic KA 2.4.11 was also selected in SRO T1 G2. Randomly I Became selected 2.4.47 from the field of un-used System Generic KAs.

12950232.4.47 T1/G1 295028A1.01 High OW Temp A1.01 is ability to monitor/operate OW Sprays. Any Became question on this topic would conflict with several' scenario events.

295028 A1.03 Randomly selected A 1.03 T1/G1 295024 2.1.07 A question on 2.1.07 would overlap with operating exam. Randomly Became selected 2.4.31 from the field of un-used System Generic KAs.

2950242.4.31 T1/G1 295030 K3.07 NPSH considerations (K3.07) for ECCS pumps at QC are based on Became Torus water temp and pump flow, not Torus level. Randomly 295030 K3.03 selected an alternate K.3 topic TilER 1 Group 2 T1/G2 295012 K2.01 Unable to write an operationally valid question about OW Became Ventilation. The only other K2 topic is OW Cooling (K2.02), which 295015 K2.07 would conflict with the KA Topic for 295028, OW Hi Temp Emergency. From the field of unused T1 G2 evolutions, mndomly selected 295015. Selected from K2 again in order to maintain Outline balance. Randomly selected K2.11, Instrument Air, but that topic would be over-sampled (See RO T1G1 and RO& SRO T2G1)

Randomly selected K2.10, SPDS, but were unable to write an

" operationally valid question on that topic. Randomly selected K2.05, RWM, but a question on that topic would conflict with the RWM question in HO T2G2. Randomly selected K2.08, neutron monitoring, but a question on that topic would conflict with previously developed SRO T3 question 2.4.46. Randomly selected K2.07. I na T1/G2 2950362.4.01 Unable to meet 2 part of KIA statement since there are no Became I immediate operator actions for QGA 300 on Reactor Building water 295036 2.4.04 level. Randomly selected 2.4.04 from the field of un-used System Generic KAs.

T1/G2 500000 EA1.07 Unable to write an operationally val1id question about N2 Purge Became during an H2 accident condition. Randomly selected an alternate 500000 EA1.01 A.1 topic ES-401, Page 27 of 33

ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 2012 NRC EXAM RO Tier 2 Group 1 Tier / Randomly II Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA T2/G1 2030002.4.06 Outline T2G1 had 4 generics but only 1 K4 and Tier Total had S Became Generics but only 2 K4s. To achieve better balance, from the field 203000 K4.06 of T1G1 Systems with a Generic KA, randomly selected 203000 and replaced the Generic KA with a randomly selected K4 Topic.

T2/G1 215005 2.2.25 System 21S00S was oversampled (selected twice in RO T2G1 and Became once in SRO T2G1). Randomly deselected the Generic KA.

217000 2.4.21 Randomly selected System 217000 and a 2.4.21 from the field of un-used System Generic KAs.

217000 2.4.21 Unable to write a psychometrically sound question on this topic.

Became From the field of un-used System Generic KlAs, randomly selected 217000 2.4.20 2.4.20.

T2/G1 300000 K3.02 System 300000 was oversampled (selected twice in RO T2G1 and Became once in SRO T2G1). Randomly deselected the K3. Randomly 203000 K3.03 selected System 203000 and a K3.03.

T2/G1 209002 K4.01 209002 (HPCS) was used as a place-holder for SSrv1P during the Became initial random selection process. Replaced HPCS with SSMP.

SSMP K4.01 did not apply to SSMP so randomly selected a new K4 from (217000) K4.07 I the RCIC topics.

T2/G1 300000 2.4.50 2.4.50 would be about a loss of air transient and would conflict with Became the question for 29S019 in Tier 1. From the field of un-used System 3000002.1.28 Generic KlAs, randomly selected 2.1.28 T2/G1 209001 K5.01 Unable to write a psychometrically sound question on this topic.

Became (Indications of pump cavitation) Randomly selected an alternate KS 209001 K5.04 topic.

T2/G1 212000 K1.07 Topic K1.07 (Low-Low Set Logic) is not applicable to RPS at Quad Became Cities. Randomly selected an alternate K1 topic.

212000 K1.15 T2/G1 218000 A4.07 A question on A4.07 would overlap with operating exam. Randomly Became selected an alternate A4 topic.

218000 A4.06 I T2/G1 239002 K5.03 A question on KS.03 would overlap with operating exam. Randomly Became selected an alternate K.S topic.

239002 K5.06 T2/G1 I 215004 K6.04 Unable to write a psychometrically sound question about SRM Became "detectors failure". Randomly selected K6.02, but this topic is too 215004 K6.01 similar to a previously developed IRM question. Randomly selected K6.0S, but were unable to write a psychometrically sound question about SRM trip unit failure". Randomly selected K6.03, but importance rating was < 2.S and it is not facility identified important item. Randomly selected K6.01 ES-401 , Page 27 of 33

ES-401 Record of Rejected KJAs Form ES-401-4 2012 NRC EXAM RO I Tier 2 Group 1 (Continued)

Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA ,

T2/G1 . 2150032.4.06 No EOP mitigation strategies related to I'RMs. Randomly selected Became 2.1.30 but IRMs have no in-plant components to operate and control 2150032.1.07 room operations would conflict with a previously developed SRM question. Randomly selected 2.1.27 but could not write a discriminatory question on system purpose. Randomly selected 2.2.22 but there are no <1 hr Tech Spec and no Safety Limits associated with IRMs. From the field of un-used System Generic KlAs, randomly selected 2.1.07.

T2/G1 262001 K6.03 . Unable to write a question that did not conflict with previously Became developed questions on the topic of generator Trip. Randomly 262001 K6.01 selected an alternate K6 topic.

I 223002 A1.03 Unable to write an operationaHy valid quest,ion for PCIS related to T2/G1 Became SPDS. Randomly selected an aUernate A.1 topic.

223002 A1.01 Tier 2 Group 2 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA T2/G2 202002 A4.06 A4.06 addresses "Scoop Tube power", a topic that is no longer Became applicable to ac. Randomly selected an alternate A4.

202002 A4.08 T2IG2 201006 K6.01 KIA K6.01 is loss of RWM Power supply. Power comes from Plant Became Process Computer at Quad Cities. Could not write an operationally 201006 K6.03 valid question. Randomly selected an alternate K6 topic.

T2IG2 204000 2.4.49 Topic 2.4.49 is not applicable to RWCU at Quad Cities. (Immediate Became operator actions without reference to procedures) From the field of 204000 2.4.02 un-used System Generic KlAs, randomly selected 2.4.02.

T2IG2 234000 A2.02 No question could be developed to match the A.2 KIA statement for Became this system. The A.2 statement measures the ROs' ability to use 239001 A2.11 procedures to mitigate the failures. However, Quad Cities Fuel Handling procedures do not address a "loss of Refuel Bridge air" failure. The same problem exists for the other two A.2 topics. In

. order to maintain outline balance, from the field of unused T2G2

~stems, randomly selected 239001 and selected from A2 again.

ES-401*, Page 27 of 33

ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 2012 NRC EXAM SRO Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA SRO TIER 1 Group 1 T1 295030 A2.04 Unable to write a psychometrically sound question on this topic.

Became (OW to Torus OP related to Low Torus Level) Randomly selected an G1 295030 A2.01 alternate A2 topic.

I T1 2950182.1 .19 2.1.19 (Using plant computers) was not applicable to Abnormal Became Event 295018. From the field of un-used System Generic KlAs, G1 295018 2.2.37 randomly selected 2.2.37 T1 295026 A2.02 A2.02 was repeated from the Cert Exam and 3 other questions were Became related to Low Torus Level. Randomly selected an alternate A2 G1 295026 A2.01 topic.

295026 A2.01 I Unable to write an SRO level question on A.2 topics for High Torus Became Water Temperature. Randomly reselected Evolution 295037 and 295037 A2.06 an alternate A.2 topic.

T1 2950i1 A2.07 Unable to write a psychometrically sound question on this topic.

Became (Reactor recirculation) Randomly selected an alternate A2 topic.

G1 295021 A2.03 I T1 700000 2.2.36 A question on 2.2.36 would overlCiiJ with operating exam. From the Became field of un-used System Generic KlAs, randomly selected 2.4.41 G1 700000 2.4.41 7000002.4.41 I Unable to write an SRO level question on Grid Instability without I Became overlapping previously developed questions. Randomly selected 2950262.4.181' Evolution 295026 and, from the field of un-used Generic KlAs, an alternate generic topic

, SRO TIER 1 Group 2 I T1 295012 A2.03 Evolution 295012 was being over-sampled (also selected in RO Became T2G2) Randomly reselected Evolution 295033 and an alternate A2.

G2 295033 A2.03 T1 295010 2.4.46 2.4.46 was being over-sampled (also selected in Tier 3). Randomly Became reselected 2.2.44 from the field of un-used Generic KlAs.

G2 2950102.2.44 T1 295010 2.2.44 Unable to write a question that did not conflict with previously Became developed questions on the topic of High Orywell pressure.

G2 2950122.2.22 Randomly reselected Evolution 295012 and, from the field of un used Generic KlAs, an alternate generic topic ES-401, Page 27 of 33

ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 2012 NRC EXAM SRO SRO TI~R 2 Group 1 Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA T2 259002 2.4.49 : 2.4.49 was being over-sampled (selected in RO T2G2 and T3 and Became in SRO T2G2). Randomly reselected 2.4.30 from the field of un G1 259002 2.4.30 used Generic KlAs.

I T2 262001 2.2.22 System 262001 was being over-sampled (selected twice in RO I Became T2G1 and once in SRO T2G1). Randomly reselected system G11 209001 2.4.45 209001 and topic 2.4.45 from the field of un-used Generic KlAs.

T2 209002 A2.14 209002 (HPCS) was used as a place-holder for SSMP during the Became initial random selection process. Replaced HPCS with SSMP.

G1 A2.14 did not apply to SSMP so randomly selected a new A2 from I SSMP (217000) A2.05 the RCIC topics.

, (SSMP) 217000 A question on A2.05 would overlap with operating exam. Randomly I A2.05 selected an alternate A2 topic.

Became (SSMP) 217000 A2.13 (SSMP) 217000 Unable to write an SRO level question on A.2 topics for the Safe A2.13 Shutdown Ma'keup Pump. Randomly selected an alternate T2G 1 Became system. Randomly selected a new A2 topic.

206000 A2.09 206000 A2.09 I Unable to write a question HPCI that would not conflict with Became previously developed questions on other ECCS systems or suction 239002 A2.06 sources. Randomly selected an alternate T2G1 system. Randomly selected a new A2 topic.

T2 300000 2.4.41 2.4.41 concerns EAL thresholds for loss of air but there are none.

Became From the field of un-used System Generic KlAs, randomly selected G1 300000 2.4.35 2.4.35 300000 2.4.35 I Unable to write an SRO level question because KIA 2.4.35 asks Became about Equipment Operator actions. Randomly reselected an 300000 2.4.06 alternate topic from the field of un-used Generic KlAs.

T2 215005 A2.01 A question on A2.01 would overlap with operatinQ' exam. Randomly Became selected an alternate A2 topic.

G1 215005 A2.04 SRO TIER 2 Group 2 T2 215002 2.4.18 System Generic Topic 2.4.18 (Specific EOP Bases) does not apply Became to 'RWM. From the field of un-used System Generic KlAs, randomly G2 2150022.4.20 selected 2.2.40 ES-401, Page 27 of 33

ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 2012 NRC EXAM TIER 3 RO Tier 3 Tier / Randomly I Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA T3 2.1.03 I 2.1.03 was previously selected and used on the Cert Exam. From Became the unused 2.1 Generic KJAs, randomly selected 2.1.39.

2.1.39 T3 I 2.2.01 2.2.01 was previously selected and used on the Cert Exam. From Became the unused 2.2 Generic KJAs, randomly selected 2.2.39.

2.2.39 2.2.39 2.2.39 was previously selected and used on the Cert Exam. Also, Became unable to develop a Generic question without being a Systems 2.2.42 question. From the unused 2.2 Generic KJAs, randomly selected 2.2.42 T3 2.3.07 2.3.07 was previously selected and used on the Cert Exam. From Became the unused 2.3 Generic KJAs, randomly selected 2.3.11.

2.3.11 T3 2.4.49 2.4.49 was selected 3 times and was being over-sampled (also Became selected in RO T2G2 and in SRO T2G1). Randomly reselected 2.4.27 2.4.27 from the field of un-used Generic KJAs.

ES-401, Page 27 of 33

ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 201'2 NRC EXAM TI'ER 3 SRO Tier 3 T3 2.1.32 2.1.32 was previously used for a AO/SAO Systems JPM. From the Became unused 2.1 Generic KlAs with 10 CFA 55.43.b links, randomly 2.1.36 selected 2.1.36 2.1.36 2.1.36, procedures and limitations involved in core alterations, Became conflicts with an SAO Admin JPM. From the unused 2.1 Generic 2.1.41 KlAs with 10 CFA 55.43.b links, randomly selected 2.1.41 2.2.07 I T3 2.2.07 (Process for conducting special or infrequent tests) is not Became operationally valid at ac. From the unused 2.2 Generic KlAs with 2.2.23 10 CFA 55.43.b links, randomly selected 2.2.23 T3 2.2.05 2.2.05 (Process for making design or operating changes) is not Became operationally valid at ac. Such authority would require an 2.2.37 additional qualification. From the unused 2.2 Generic KlAs with 10 CFA 55.43.b links, randomly selected 2.2.37.

2.2.37 Unable to develop a question at the SAO level for 2.2.37. From the Became unused 2.2 Generic KlAs with 10 CFA 55.43.b links, randomly 2.2.42 se1lected 2.2.42 2.2.42 Unable to develop a question at the SAO level for 2.2.42.. From the Became unused 2.2 Generic KlAs with 10 CFA 55.43.b links, ,randomly 2.2.39 selected 2.2.39.

2.2.39 Unable to develop a question at the SAO level for 2.2.39. From the Became unused 2.2 Generic KlAs with 10 CFR 55.43.b links, randomly 2.2.25 selected 2.2.25 T3 2.3.06 2.3.06 was previously used for a JPM on the SAO Cert Exam. From Became the unused 2.3 Generic KlAs with 10 CFR 55.43.b links, ,randomly 2.3.04 selected 2.3.04.

ES-401, Page 27 of 33