ML23079A043

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023).pdf

ML23079A043
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	10/17/2022
From:	NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Theodore Wingfield
Shared Package
ML22125A065	List: ML23079A027 ML23079A043 ML23079A084
References
Download: ML23079A043 (1)

Text

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 01/30/2023 (Y)es / (N)o Item Task Description a b* c#

YI

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the z instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are Y appropriately sampled.

a: b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. y y Y

c. Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable. y y Y

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario y y Y set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.

a:

b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of y y Y applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule

, without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on

E subsequent days.

C. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 y y Y and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and y y Y quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.

a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on y y Y Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in y y Y the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants'

-, audit test(s).

C. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is y y Y sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including y y Y probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 1 O CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is y y Y

_J appropriate.

c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater y y Y w

z w

than or equal to 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams. y y Y

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. y y Y

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior y y Y

reactor operator).

a. Author r. J1e.((ou Pri/

, Date 10/j/tL

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Matt Seeley / Electronically approved 10/5/22 per email 10/5/22 C. NRC Reviewer (#) John S. Robbins Digitally signed by John S. Robbins Date: 2022.10.14 12:35:58 -05'00' NRC Chief Examiner Theodore V. Wingfield Digitally signed by Theodore V. Wingfield Date: 2022.10.14 13:43:40 -04'00' NRC Supervisor Robert J. Orlikowski Digitally signed by Robert J. Orlikowski Date: 2022.10.17 09:09:54 -05'00'

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.