ML23079A043

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023).pdf

ML23079A043
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	10/17/2022
From:	NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Theodore Wingfield
Shared Package
ML22125A065	List: ML23079A027 ML23079A043 ML23079A084 ML23079A173 ML23079A177 ML23079A180 ML23079A185 ML23079A191
References
Download: ML23079A043 (1)

Text

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 01/30/2023 Item Task Description (Y)es / (N)o a

b*

c#

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the YI z

instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are appropriately sampled.

a:

b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

y y



c. Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable.

y y

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario y

y set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.

a:

b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of y

y applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on

E subsequent days.

Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 y

y C.

and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and y

y quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.

a.

Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on y

y Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in y

y the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

C. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is y

y sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including y

y probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).

b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 1 O CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is y

y

_J appropriate.

c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater y

y w

than or equal to 2.5.

z w



d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams.

y y

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

y y

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior y

y reactor operator).

Pri_/`a Date 10/j/tL

a. Author

r. J1e.((ou

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

C. NRC Reviewer (#)

NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Matt Seeley / Electronically approved 10/5/22 per email 10/5/22 John S. Robbins Digitally signed by John S. Robbins Date: 2022.10.14 12:35:58 -05'00' Theodore V. Wingfield Digitally signed by Theodore V. Wingfield Date: 2022.10.14 13:43:40 -04'00' Robert J. Orlikowski Digitally signed by Robert J. Orlikowski Date: 2022.10.17 09:09:54 -05'00'