ML22192A206
| ML22192A206 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 07/09/2021 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20139A015 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22192A206 (2) | |
Text
OUTLINE SUBMITTAL COMMENTS Facility: Quad Cities 2021 ILE Exam Date:
June 1 - 11, 2021 Written Exam Outline (NRC Developed)
Comment Resolution 1
General Comment - Chief Examiner will replace K/As as necessary during written exam development.
Include replaced K/As on ES-401-4.
Completed.
Administrative JPM Outline (Facility Developed)
Comment Resolution 1
For both the RO and SRO Admin JPMs, ALL are listed as being conducted in the Simulator. Per NUREG-1021, ES-301, B.1, The Administrative Topics are typically administered in a classroom walkthrough format in accordance with ES-302.
Please identify on the ES-301-1 which JPMs will be conducted in a Classroom environment.
The Admin JPMNs which are suitably performed in a Classroom setting have been annotated accordingly and the ES-301-1s have been updated.
2 The Admin Topics implement the associated 10 CFR 55.45(a)(9)-(12) items.
RO ADMIN - 1st COO and EC JPMs refer 45.13.
SRO ADMIN - 2nd COO and EC JPMs refer 45.6
& 45.13 respectively. Please ensure the final JPMs meet the intent of the CFR items 9-12.
RO ADMIN 1st COO-now 45.12 tie; All other RO &
SRO ADMIN JPMs are from the appropriate Generic K/A sections of the manuals. ES-301-1s are correct.
3 Please ensure the New SRO JPM meets the requirements for being new or significantly modified, as the rest are all bank JPMs.
This JPM is New.
Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Facility Developed)
Comment Resolution 1
Several corrections are needed on the ES-301-2s: 1) Please correct applicable Safety Function for Simulator JPMs [all 8 must be different SFs];
- 2) Please annotate which JPMs involve Engineered Safety Features;
- 3) Please annotate which In-Plant JPMs involve Emergency or abnormal events/procedures; and
- 4) If JPM b initial conditions are set during low power or shutdown, please annotate as such.
- 5) It appears that JPM h and potentially JPM d should be marked as Previous 2 exams. (2018) 1&2) The ES-301-2s have been updated with correct Safety Functions and Engineered Safety Features.
- 3) ES-301-2 updated.
- 4) JPM specifies initial conditions.
- 5) Both d & h are new JPMs.
Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Facility Developed)
Comment Resolution 1
General Comments - 1) The ICs for the scenarios should be varied to include low-power conditions (Criticality to 5%) per App D of NUREG-1021. A low power scenario has not been included in the previous 4 exams.
- 2) During onsite validation verify that the Single Switch Operations for component failures are true verifiable actions for crediting malfunction.
- 3) The ES 301-5 need to be revised to reflect final crew lineups.
- 1) The current spare scenario is a low power scenario.
- 2) Validated components as SAT during onsite validation.
- 3) ES-301-5 revised for anticipated crew lineups.
2 Scenario 1:
Event 4-Review potential overlap with written exam question 25 during onsite validation.
- 1) Event 9-Are both CS pumps needed? May not count as a component failure.
- 2) Critical Task #1-Verify bounding conditions.
Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.
- 1) Event 9 is a malfunction after EOP entry, but not credited as a component failure for an applicant.
- 2) CT-1 Bounding conditions verified during onsite validation.
3 Scenario 3:
Event 5-Review potential overlap with written exam question 44 during onsite validation.
Event 9-Review potential overlap with written exam question 5 during onsite validation.
Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.
4 Scenario 4:
Event 3-Review potential overlap with written exam question 54 during onsite validation.
Event 4-Review potential overlap with written exam question 41 during onsite validation.
Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.
5 Scenario 5:
Event 5-Review potential overlap with written exam question 22 during onsite validation.
- 1) Event 7-Is there a TS action required?
- 2) Event 9-Is there a component failure?
Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.
- 1) No Tech Spec required action for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
- 2) Yes, the Group 1 is spurious.