ML22192A206

2021 QC Ile Outline Submittal Comments

ML22192A206
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	07/09/2021
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Baker R
Shared Package
ML20139A015	List: ML22192A193 ML22192A195 ML22192A196 ML22192A203 ML22192A204 ML22192A205 ML22192A206
References
Download: ML22192A206 (2)

Text

OUTLINE SUBMITTAL COMMENTS

Facility: Quad Cities 2021 ILE Exam Date: June 1 - 11, 2021

Written Exam Outline (NRC Developed)

Comment Resolution General Comment - Chief Examiner will replace Include replaced K/As on ES -401 -4.

1 K/As as necessary during written exam development. Completed.

Administrative JPM Outline

( Facility Developed)

Comment Resolution For both the RO and SRO Admin JPMs, ALL are The Admin JPMNs which are suitably performed in a listed as being conducted in the Simulator. Per Classroom setting have been annotated accordingly NUREG -1021, ES -301, B.1, The Administrative and the ES -301 -1s have been updated.

1 Topics are typically administered in a classroom walkthrough format in accordance with ES -302.

Please identify on the ES -301 -1 which JPMs will be conducted in a Classroom environment.

The Admin Topics i mplement the associated RO ADMIN 1 st COO-now 45.12 tie; All other RO &

10 CFR 55.45(a)(9) - (12) items. SR O ADMIN JPMs are from the appropriate Generic 2 RO ADMIN - 1 st COO and EC JPMs refer 45.13. K/A sections of the manuals. ES-301-1s are c orrect.

SRO ADMIN - 2 nd COO and EC JPMs refer 45.6

& 45.13 respectively. Please ensure the final JPMs meet the intent of the CFR items 9 -12.

Please ensure the New SRO JPM meets the This JPM is New.

3 requirements for being new or significantly modified, as the rest are all bank JPMs.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline

( Facility Developed)

Comment Resolution Several corrections are needed on the ES-301 - 1 &2) The ES -301 -2s have been updated with correct 2s: 1) Please correct applicable Safety Function Safety Functions and Engineered Safety Features.

for Simulator JPMs [all 8 must be different SFs]; 3) ES-301-2 updated.

2) Please annotate which JPMs involve 4) JPM specifies initial conditions.

Engineered Safety Features; 5) Both d & h are new JPMs.

1 3) Please annotate which In-Plant JPMs involve Emergency or abnormal events/procedures ; and

4) If JPM b initial conditions are set during low power or shutdown, please annotate as such.

5) It appears that JPM h and potentially JPM d should be marked as Previous 2 exams. (2018)

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Facility Developed)

Comment Resolution General Comment s - 1) The ICs for the 1) The current spare scenario is a low power scenario.

scenarios should be varied to include low -power 2) Validated components as S AT during onsite conditions (Criticality to 5%) per App D of validation.

NUREG -1021. A low power scenario has not 3) ES-301-5 revised for anticipated crew lineups.

1 been included in the previous 4 exams.

2) During onsite validation verify that the Single Switch Operations for component failures are true verifiable actions for crediting malfunction.

3 ) The ES 301-5 need to be revised to reflect final crew lineups.

Scenario 1 : Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 4-Review potential overlap with written 1) Event 9 is a malfunction after EOP entry, but not 2 exam question 25 during onsite validation. credited as a component failure for an applicant.

1) Event 9 -Are both CS pumps needed? May not 2) CT-1 Bounding conditions verified during onsite count as a component failure. validation.

2) Critical Task #1 -Verify bounding conditions.

Scenario 3: Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 5-Review potential overlap with written 3 exam question 44 during onsite validation.

Event 9-Review potential overlap with written exam question 5 during onsite validation.

Scenario 4: Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 3-Review potential overlap with written 4 exam question 54 during onsite validation.

Event 4-Review potential overlap with written exam question 41 during onsite validation.

Scenario 5 : Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 5-Review potential overlap with written 1) No Tech Spec required ac tion for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

5 exam question 22 during onsite validation. 2) Yes, the Group 1 is spurious.

1) Event 7 -Is there a TS action required?

2) Event 9 -Is there a component failure?