ML22192A206

2021 QC Ile Outline Submittal Comments

ML22192A206
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	07/09/2021
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Baker R
Shared Package
ML20139A015	List: ML22192A193 ML22192A195 ML22192A196 ML22192A203 ML22192A204 ML22192A205 ML22192A206
References
Download: ML22192A206 (2)

Text

OUTLINE SUBMITTAL COMMENTS Facility: Quad Cities 2021 ILE Exam Date: June 1 - 11, 2021 Written Exam Outline (NRC Developed)

Comment Resolution General Comment - Chief Examiner will replace Include replaced K/As on ES-401-4.

1 K/As as necessary during written exam development. Completed.

Administrative JPM Outline (Facility Developed)

Comment Resolution For both the RO and SRO Admin JPMs, ALL are The Admin JPMNs which are suitably performed in a listed as being conducted in the Simulator. Per Classroom setting have been annotated accordingly NUREG-1021, ES-301, B.1, The Administrative and the ES-301-1s have been updated.

1 Topics are typically administered in a classroom walkthrough format in accordance with ES-302.

Please identify on the ES-301-1 which JPMs will be conducted in a Classroom environment.

The Admin Topics implement the associated RO ADMIN 1st COO-now 45.12 tie; All other RO &

10 CFR 55.45(a)(9)-(12) items. SRO ADMIN JPMs are from the appropriate Generic RO ADMIN - 1st COO and EC JPMs refer 45.13. K/A sections of the manuals. ES-301-1s are correct.

2 SRO ADMIN - 2nd COO and EC JPMs refer 45.6

& 45.13 respectively. Please ensure the final JPMs meet the intent of the CFR items 9-12.

Please ensure the New SRO JPM meets the This JPM is New.

3 requirements for being new or significantly modified, as the rest are all bank JPMs.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Facility Developed)

Comment Resolution Several corrections are needed on the ES-301- 1&2) The ES-301-2s have been updated with correct 2s: 1) Please correct applicable Safety Function Safety Functions and Engineered Safety Features.

for Simulator JPMs [all 8 must be different SFs]; 3) ES-301-2 updated.

2) Please annotate which JPMs involve 4) JPM specifies initial conditions.

Engineered Safety Features; 5) Both d & h are new JPMs.

1 3) Please annotate which In-Plant JPMs involve Emergency or abnormal events/procedures; and

4) If JPM b initial conditions are set during low power or shutdown, please annotate as such.

5) It appears that JPM h and potentially JPM d should be marked as Previous 2 exams. (2018)

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Facility Developed)

Comment Resolution General Comments - 1) The ICs for the 1) The current spare scenario is a low power scenario.

scenarios should be varied to include low-power 2) Validated components as SAT during onsite conditions (Criticality to 5%) per App D of validation.

NUREG-1021. A low power scenario has not 3) ES-301-5 revised for anticipated crew lineups.

been included in the previous 4 exams.

1

2) During onsite validation verify that the Single Switch Operations for component failures are true verifiable actions for crediting malfunction.

3) The ES 301-5 need to be revised to reflect final crew lineups.

Scenario 1: Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 4-Review potential overlap with written 1) Event 9 is a malfunction after EOP entry, but not exam question 25 during onsite validation. credited as a component failure for an applicant.

2

1) Event 9-Are both CS pumps needed? May not 2) CT-1 Bounding conditions verified during onsite count as a component failure. validation.

2) Critical Task #1-Verify bounding conditions.

Scenario 3: Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 5-Review potential overlap with written 3 exam question 44 during onsite validation.

Event 9-Review potential overlap with written exam question 5 during onsite validation.

Scenario 4: Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 3-Review potential overlap with written 4 exam question 54 during onsite validation.

Event 4-Review potential overlap with written exam question 41 during onsite validation.

Scenario 5: Acceptable overlap between Op Test and Written Exam.

Event 5-Review potential overlap with written 1) No Tech Spec required action for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

5 exam question 22 during onsite validation. 2) Yes, the Group 1 is spurious.

1) Event 7-Is there a TS action required?

2) Event 9-Is there a component failure?