Text

2021 QC Ile ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
	ML22193A300
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	05/05/2021
From:	Randy Baker; NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	; Exelon Generation Co
	Baker R
Shared Package
ML20139A014	List: ML22193A299; ML22193A300; ML22193A301; ML22193A303; ML22193A305; ML22193A308; ML22193A310; ML22193A311; ML22193A312;
References
	Download: ML22193A300 (2)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

Form ES-301-4 C'a..UHu* f"i)l!:;J ..,._._ . , .... - . I .* I I I 1, I - . . I 1 "V

                                                                                                                         , .........u ..

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* t!

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

u ~ v~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

r ~

3. Each event descnption consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when It Is to be initiated

       **      the malfundion(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ~~
the expected operator actions (by shift position) 0 ep,,
the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. r- .,.- ~

5. 5equenclng and timing of events Is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. r- ~ *~

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario sunvnary clearly so indicates.

7. 8. Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. The smulator modeling Is not altered. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.48(d), any open simulator performanc

                                                                                                           .            r-r- PIii- ~--       e\'S3
                                                                                                                                   ~-

e deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity ls maintained while running the planned scenarios. r ~

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301 .

r- tuC: ""'

10. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Fann ES-301-6 ,

(submit the fonn along with the simulator scenarios). 0 ~ ~~

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable (J rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ~

12. Each applicant wiU be significantly Involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form wiUI the simulator scenarios). er- ~

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

when er-0- ~

                                                                                                                                   *       ~~

M Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section 0.5.d) Actual Attributes - - -

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I i I I r nl" ~~

2. 3. Abnonnal events (2-4) Major transients (1-2)

'-{

I t '-/ I I Lf I er-- er-- * ~

                                                                                                                                 °"" ~~

I I

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) z_ I Z. I I er- -" ~

5. Entry into a contingency EOP With substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario set) ~l, ' D I I 0- -po#' ~

6. Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 3 I 2I '1 0--- 1'JIJ ~

The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrenc e is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Fonn ES-301-4

 - ...       (':l " '
                                   .. -**-        *V II I 1 I    -        , ....._____ /J I "' I                           , _... 1,av**

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initial& a b* c!

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be gut of service, but it does not c.. the operators into expected events. a- ~

f~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. u-- 1/HI- ~~

3. Each event description consists of the following:

the point In the scenario when It Is to be initiated
the malfunctlon(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 0 q;,,, ~
the expected operator adlons (by shift position)
the event termination point (If applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. f:F ~ ~

5. 6. Sequencing and tmlng of events Is reasonable and aUows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. If time compression techniques ara used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufftclent time to carry out eicpected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given. (J-u

                                                                                                                                  ~
                                                                                                                                     -----     ~
                                                                                                                                               ~

7. The simulator modeling Is not altered. tJ-- l>,ltll,- ~

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfonnance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional cr- .,,,. ~.g 1/)- ~ .,

fidelity Is maintained while n.,nnlng the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

(]-

10. AU Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator acenartos). <'.,"-

re.,

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each appUcant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and Es-303-3.)

v ~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form Es-301-5 (submit the fonn with the simulator scenarios). ~ ~ ~

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible. (;-" -~ ?.o()

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. 0 ~

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes - ---- 1. 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) Abnonnal events (2--4) '1 I

                                                                                                       ,~ --

I j I I r 0 ..... ~

3. Major transients (1-2) I I I I - 0- ~- ~

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) z. I ). I - rr- J , >~,

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive aetions ~ 1 per scenario .....

set) I I I ' (/ v-

                                                                                                                                     -   .£ r~

6. Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2)

The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC--0eveloped tests.

1... I 2. / - ~ ,-a ~

An independent NRC reviewer initials Items in column *c*; chief examiner concurrence is required.}}

ML22193A300

Text

Navigation menu

Search