ML22193A300

2021 QC Ile ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

ML22193A300
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	05/05/2021
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Baker R
Shared Package
ML20139A014	List: ML22193A299 ML22193A300 ML22193A301 ML22193A303 ML22193A305 ML22193A308 ML22193A310 ML22193A311 ML22193A312
References
Download: ML22193A300 (2)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

• Form ES-301-4

C'a..UHu* f"i)l!:;J..,._._.,.... -. I.* I I I 1, I -.. I 1., -

- "V, -,......... u..

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials

1. The initial a b* t!

conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, v~ but it does not cue the operators into expected events. u ~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. r ----* ~

3. Each event descnption consists of the following: -

• the point in the scenario when It Is to be initiated

** the malfundion(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event ~~

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 0 ep,,
• the expected operator actions (by shift position)
• the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics..,. r- - ~

5. 5equenclng and timing of events Is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. r- ~ * ~

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario sunvnary clearly so indicates. e\\'S3 Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints. r- -- Cues are given.

7. The smulator modeling Is not altered. r-PIii- ~

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.48(d), any open simulator performance r deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional ""' ~

fidelity ls maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. r- ~- tuC:

10. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Fann ES-301-6 (submit the 0, ~~

fonn along with the simulator scenarios). ~

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable (J rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ~

12. Each applicant wiU be significantly Involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified er- -~ -

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form wiUI the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when er- * ~~

possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. 0- ~ M

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section 0.5.d) Actual Attributes - - -

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I i I I r nl" ~~

2. Abnonnal events (2-4) '-{ t '-/ I Lf er-- * ~

3. Major transients ( 1-2) I I I I I er-- °"" ~~

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) z_ I Z. I I er- -" ~

5. Entry into a contingency EOP With substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario ~l, ' D I I 0- -po# ' ~

set)

6. Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 3 I 2 I '1 0--- 1'JIJ ~

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c" ; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Fonn ES-301-4

-... (':l "'.. *- II I 1 I - /J "',..... _____
-* *V I I,_... 1,av **

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initial& a b* c!

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be gut of service, a-.

but it does not c.. the operators into expected events. ~ f~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. u-- 1/HI- ~~

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the point In the scenario when It Is to be initiated
• the malfunctlon(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event 0 ~
• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew q;,,,
• the expected operator adlons (by shift position)
• the event termination point (If applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. f:F ~ ~

5. Sequencing and tmlng of events Is reasonable and aUows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. (J- --~

6. If time compression techniques ara used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufftclent time to carry out eicpected activities without undue time constraints. - ~ Cues are given. u ---

~ ~

7. The simulator modeling Is not altered. l>,ltll,-tJ--

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfonnance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional cr-.,,,. ~.g fidelity Is maintained while n.,nnlng the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. (]- 1/)- ~.,

10. AU Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the <'.,"- re.,

form along with the simulator acenartos). - 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each appUcant to be evaluated in each of the applicable v... ~ rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and Es-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form Es-301-5 (submit the fonn with the simulator scenarios). ~ ~ ~

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when (;-" -~

possible. ?.o()

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. 0 --- ~

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes - - -

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) I I j I - r.,,,,. ~

2. Abnonnal events (2--4) '1,~ I - 0..... ~

3. Major transients (1-2) I I I I - 0- ~- ~

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) z. I ). I - rr-J, >~,

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive aetions ~ 1 per scenario I I I '..... -.£ r~

set) (/ v-

6. Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 1... I 2. / - ~,-a ~

• The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC--0eveloped tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials Items in column *c*; chief examiner concurrence is required.}}