ML22193A300
| ML22193A300 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 05/05/2021 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20139A014 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22193A300 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
- Form ES-301-4 C'a..UHu* f"i)l!:;J
. I.* I I I 1, I I 1 "V ,......... u.. QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* t!
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, v~ but it does not cue the operators into expected events. u ~
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events. r ~
- 3.
Each event descnption consists of the following: the point in the scenario when It Is to be initiated the malfundion(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event ~~ the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 0 ep,, the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) r- -~
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
- 5.
5equenclng and timing of events Is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. r- ~ * ~
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario sunvnary clearly so indicates. e\\'S3 Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints. r--- Cues are given.
- 7.
The smulator modeling Is not altered. r-PIii- ~
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.48(d), any open simulator performance r deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional ~ fidelity ls maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. r- ~- tuC:
- 10. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Fann ES-301-6 (submit the 0
~~ fonn along with the simulator scenarios). ~
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable (J -
~ rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
- 12. Each applicant wiU be significantly Involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified er--~
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form wiUI the simulator scenarios).
- 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when er- * ~~
possible.
- 14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
0- ~ M Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section 0.5.d) Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I i I I r nl" ~~
- 2.
Abnonnal events (2-4) '-{ t '-/ I Lf er-- * ~
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) I I I I I er-- °"" ~~
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) z_ I Z. I I er- -" ~
- 5.
Entry into a contingency EOP With substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario ~l, ' D I I 0- -po#' ~ set)
- 6.
Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 3 I 2 I '1 0--- 1'JIJ ~
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Fonn ES-301-4 (':l "' II I 1 I /J "'
- V I
I ... 1,av ** QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initial& a b* c!
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be gut of service, a- . f~ but it does not c.. the operators into expected events. ~
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events. u-- 1/HI- ~~
- 3.
Each event description consists of the following: the point In the scenario when It Is to be initiated the malfunctlon(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event 0 ~ the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew q;,,, the expected operator adlons (by shift position) the event termination point (If applicable)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. f:F ~ ~
- 5.
Sequencing and tmlng of events Is reasonable and aUows the examination team to obtain complete ~ evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. (J---
- 6.
If time compression techniques ara used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufftclent time to carry out eicpected activities without undue time constraints. ~ Cues are given. u --- tJ-- ~ ~
- 7.
The simulator modeling Is not altered. l>,ltll,-
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfonnance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional cr-.,,,. ~.g fidelity Is maintained while n.,nnlng the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. (]- 1/)-~.,
- 10. AU Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the re.,
form along with the simulator acenartos).
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each appUcant to be evaluated in each of the applicable v... ~
rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and Es-303-3.)
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified
~ ~ ~ on Form Es-301-5 (submit the fonn with the simulator scenarios).
- 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when
(;-" -~ ?.o() possible.
- 14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
0 --- ~ Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) I I j I - r .,,,,. ~
- 2.
Abnonnal events (2--4) '1,~ I - 0..... ~
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) I I I I - 0- ~- ~
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
- z.
I ). I - rr-J , >~
- 5.
Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive aetions ~ 1 per scenario I I I ' .£ r~ set) (/ v-
- 6.
Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 1... I 2. / - ~ ,-a ~
- The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC--0eveloped tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer initials Items in column *c*; chief examiner concurrence is required.}}