ML14071A063

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End

ML14071A063
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A063 (34)

Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 6 FI-- -107 Status: YO N[D U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. .SH21L503B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER 8 TRAIN BA1TERY ROOM HVAC LCS Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 1,88 Room, Area 72C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NO U- N/AQ Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YC@ NO U[3 NIAO oxidation?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NO UO N/An Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UR potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 194 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SH21L5038 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Descriplion YICEBYE WA TER,B OWTRN BAIT Y ROOM 1HVAC LO Interaction Efrects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO Ur N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO Ur N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed. All internalconnections and routed cables have been determinedto be adequateand pose no adverseseismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 9/11/12.

Finalwalkdown performed on 2/6/13 to Inspectcabinet internals.No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date:

V Tnylor Vnun hh,,.,

Tal,11jr Younphitmul (J(j Page 195 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Page 196 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 197 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 198 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 199 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 fl-let Status: YS NE UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SH22L0502 Equip. Class' Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1-2A, Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 6t Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO Nn UO N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AQ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJM Nr3 U[D N/ArO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationverified on 8/3CY12 per SEWS package dated

&24194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 200 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OSH22L0502 Equip. Class, Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1-2A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO1N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur NIAQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UO NIAO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables hadadequate flex. All mounting hardwareand anchorageIs Intact and appearsIn good condition.

Comments(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Original walkdown performed on /30/12 verifled anchorageand IPEEE resolution.

Walkdown on 9125/13 pedormed to Inspect cabinetinternals.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Date: q Z-11 Nikol Arrant Page 201 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-108 Sheet 3 of 3 I

Page 202 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Yo N[-] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SR42BO516A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Unit I Servke Water Battery Fuse Box Train A Location: Bldg. SWIS$ Floor El. 1.8 Room. Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panelanchoragewas venfied in walkdowns dated 8/29/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NOI UI N/AO The anchoragein the panel is free from potentially adverseseismic conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U- N/AQ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NEI Ur N/AI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage In the panel was verified on 8/29/12 and Is consistentwith SEWS package dated 417/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U[-3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 203 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YU N[3 Ur' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SR42BO516A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Unit I Service Water Batten Fuse Box Train A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO U' N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEI Ur N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN* NO UO N/AlO YO NO UQ

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y19 NOI UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment Inside the panel was adequatelyrestrainedwith no loose connections andno missing bolts.

Conments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performedto inspectpanel internals and complete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/29/2012.

Evaluated by: L Date: *?r/12-43 Tern,Alan MguL~x $~I~iA.a a- ý

\KJ, - zci -

Page 204 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 205 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 206 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofg3 *11f3 F1 - %%o Status: YO N[r] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OSR42B520B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW BATTERY NO. 3 OR 4 DETECTION CABINET Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area .7_3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UD N/Al Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO ND UD N/AQ oxidation?

Anchorage venrfied SAT on 9/12/12

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/AO Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12

' Enter the equipment class name rrom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 207 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 03 */,,

Status: YO NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QSR42B520B Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SW BA7TERY NO.3 OR 4 DETECTION CABAINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U" N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UF N/An and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO Nr UO N/A[Q

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The internalsof tMe cabinet were inspectedand no missing hardwareor fasteners was observed The cables Inside the cabinet had adequate flex. No other adverseseismic conditons were present.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed oniginally on 9/12/12.

-C Evaluated by: Ryan HarJos III Date: . i Tavlar Vnunphlrund &lfY1.f

(/'U 6 )ýýo Page 208 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I

Page 209 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet z of 4 Status: Yo NE ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SR4280525A Equip.

Equipment Description SW Buildin A Train BattelvSol Sw Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 1L8 Room, Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorsu I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YCM N3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panelanchoragewas verffed in walkdowns dated 8/29/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UE] NIAQ The anchoragein the panelis free from potentiallyadverse seismic condutis.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NC3 U[I NIAQ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NC3 U[3 NIAC3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NI- UO NIAC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchoragein the panel was verified on 8/29/12 and is consistent with SEWS package dated 417194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Ener the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 210 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UQ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SR4260525A Equip.

Equipment Description SIN Building A Train Batte,V Sel Sw Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NE UQ N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NOI UO N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipmentinside the panel was adequatelyrestrainedwith no loose connections and no missing bolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Finalwalkdown performed to inspect panel internalsand complete anchorageverification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/29/2012.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay TJ ZSQelLA Date: 2-1

- 3:;

Terry Alan MYUlen" 44, 4 /JAD Ili vlýj I U

Page 211 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 212 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 213 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 SeI-s 15 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Yo Nn ul-I Equipment ID No. QSR42BO526B Equip. Class, 16 Equipment Description SERVICE-WATER BLDG BATTERY CHARGER NO. 2 (STANDBYJ Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 ....... Room, Area 72D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorafze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YONO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verified on 8/30/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YN NO UO N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y0R NO UO N/AQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YM3 NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage venfled on 8/30112.

of Equipment.

=Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes

• Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page Page 214 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SR42B0526B Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER BLDG BATTERY CHARGER NQO 2 (STANDBY)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UF N/Arl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOl U[3 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UO N/AI-All Internalcables have adequate flex and do not representan adverse seismic condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO*NO U[3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables have adequateflex and all mounting hardwareis intactand appearsto be in good condition. All sensitive equipment Inside the cabinet (I.e. circuit boards)are mounted adequatelyandpose no seismic concern.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

External inspection peoformed8/30/12.

Second walkdown perfonned to Inspect Intemals found no adverse seismic conditions.

IPEEEoutliers,restraincartand ladderIn area,have been resolved. No unrestraineditems are located in this area.

Walkdown end SWC originallycompleted 10/16/13 has been retyped for clarity.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson _ i  ? Date:

On4hyL Nikole ArrantuR'k-I& xsi Page 215 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-113 (QSR4280526B) Shieet 3of 4 Page 216 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-113 (05R42130526R) Sheet 4of 4 Page 217 of 217

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 8 UNIT 1 - AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) (Version 2.0)

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 A total of 2 Area Walk-bys have been completed.

The Checklists are provided within this Attachment.

Page 1 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[D ND UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105" Room, Area' CTMT 105' Inside Bloshleld Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NO UO N/Al:

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NE UO N/AO degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NO Ur N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NOI UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All overhead equioment appearedto be mounted adequatelyand In good condition.

' Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 2 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 y h i W Status: YO NEI UQ]

Area i-ArWalk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105' Room, Area, CTMT 105' Iside Bloshleld

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO UO N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO UO N/AO interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NOI UO N/An interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporarycables were In the vicinity of the valve, but do not pose an adverse seismic condition. All scaffold and othermaterialstaged for outage activities was propedystored and Wll1 be removed nearthe end of the outage.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson

• Date: 9/10/13 Nikole Arrant 9/30/13 Page 3 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-008 (AWC) CTMT 105' El. Sheet 3 of 4 Page 4 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-OO8 (AWC) CTMT 105' El. Sheet 4 of 4 Page 5 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of.5 Status: YN NEI uO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area' CTMT 129' nearpenetrations Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NO UD N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2, Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NO UD N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO ND U- N/AO raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays and otheroverheadequipment are adequatelysupported and appearIn good condition. This valve Is also located directly below grating which would protect It from Interaction with the overhead equipment.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NO UD N/Al interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 6 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5

~Status: Y~Ni] uQ~

(AWC)

Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area' CTMT 1291'nearoenetratlons

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NOI UO NIAD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO UD NIAO interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO UQ N/AQ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

This areais not being used for materialstorage. Workers In the area were practicinggood houskeeping. No scaffold or temporary installationswere present.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NOl Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Waikdown and A WC completed onginallyon 9/30/13 has been retyped for clarity.

Evaluated by: Brian Nel&on Date: _ $/1 _ _

Nikole Arrant C{kok~ds..' ~1 Page 7 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 (AWC) CTMIT 129' El. Sheet 3 of 5 Page 8 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 (AWC) CTMT 129' El. Sheet 4 of S Page 9 of 10

ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 (AWC) C"MT 129' El. Sheet 5 of 5 Page 10 of 10