ML100150763: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML100150763
| number = ML100150763
| issue date = 01/15/2010
| issue date = 01/15/2010
| title = 01/14/2010 Meeting Presentation Brunswick Nuclear Plant Human Performance
| title = Meeting Presentation Brunswick Nuclear Plant Human Performance
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Nuclear Generation Group, Progress Energy Co
| author affiliation = Nuclear Generation Group, Progress Energy Co
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Brunswick Nuclear Plant Human Performance NRC Region II Visit January 14, 2010 Agenda l Human Performance (HU) Excellence Plan w Development w Inputs w Focus Areas l Focus Area Key Actions l Results l Summary 2 01/13/10 HU Excellence Plan Development l Benchmarked Industry l Established a Living Plan with action assignments tracked by the Corrective Action Program l Established Metrics to monitor effectiveness l Action assignments tracked in the Corrective Action
{{#Wiki_filter:Brunswick Nuclear Plant Human Performance NRC Region II Visit January 14, 2010 Enclosure 2


Program l Plan reviewed by Fleet and INPO l Aligned Station through high visibility and consistent communication of the plan 3 01/13/10 HU Excellence Plan Inputs lCommon Cause Analysis -2008 w Risk Identification/Mitigation w Engineering Technical rigor w Equipment Reliability l Corrective Action Program Trend Reports l Site Level Human Performance Events l INPO Performance Indicators l NRC Cross Cutting Matrix 4 01/13/10 HU Excellence Plan Focus Areas l Focus Areas l Behavior Change and Reinforcement l Procedures l Risk Identification and Mitigation l Work Control l Key Enabler l Training 5 01/13/10 Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l 17 Key actions l Increased First Line Supervisor oversight of field activities l Conducted Leadership Assessment l Conducted Accountability training to all site personnel l Site Leadership completed a Leadership workbook l Established Supervisor Steering committee l Enhanced oversight and training of Supplemental Personnel 01/13/10 6 Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l Implemented Dynamic Learning Activities l Implemented new Observation program in September 2009 w Allowed better trending of data w Improved entry and monitoring process w Implemented at a fleet level w Implemented in-process Technical review observations w Improved Major Projects utilization of the observation program l Developed, proceduralized and implemented consistent HU clock reset criteria 01/13/10 7 Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l Communicated HU Excellence Plan site-wide l Established HU Program Oversight w HU Program Manager position reporting to Director of Site Operation w Human Performance Core Team lead by HU Program
Agenda l Human Performance (HU) Excellence Plan w Development w Inputs w Focus Areas l Focus Area Key Actions l Results l Summary 2              01/13/10 Enclosure 2


Manager as the implementation arm of the HUSC w Human Performance Steering Committee (HUSC) as the
HU Excellence Plan Development l Benchmarked Industry l Established a Living Plan with action assignments tracked by the Corrective Action Program l Established Metrics to monitor effectiveness l Action assignments tracked in the Corrective Action Program l Plan reviewed by Fleet and INPO l Aligned Station through high visibility and consistent communication of the plan 3                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


senior site management team w Review Boards w Shared learning through site and fleet communications w Nuclear Safety Review Committee standing agenda item l Established and communicated NGG Leadership
HU Excellence Plan Inputs l Common Cause Analysis - 2008 w Risk Identification/Mitigation w Engineering Technical rigor w Equipment Reliability l Corrective Action Program Trend Reports l Site Level Human Performance Events l INPO Performance Indicators l NRC Cross Cutting Matrix 4                        01/13/10 Enclosure 2


Behaviors 8 01/13/10 Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Remaining Actions l Develop supervisor training guideline to support line employee transition to supervision l Perform Self-Assessment of monthly
HU Excellence Plan Focus Areas l Focus Areas l Behavior Change and Reinforcement l Procedures l Risk Identification and Mitigation l Work Control l Key Enabler l Training 5                          01/13/10 Enclosure 2


observations in comparison to monthly Nuclear
Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l 17 Key actions l Increased First Line Supervisor oversight of field activities l Conducted Leadership Assessment l Conducted Accountability training to all site personnel l Site Leadership completed a Leadership workbook l Established Supervisor Steering committee l Enhanced oversight and training of Supplemental Personnel 6                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


Condition Reports to evaluate effectiveness of identifying, coaching & correcting behaviors at a low threshold l Conduct a Supervisory effectiveness Self-Assessment l Implement a training strategy to improve performance of supplemental craft, supervision and supplemental project management oversight 01/13/10 9 Procedures Key Actions l 46 Key Actions l Site personnel completed an Adverse Human Performance Trend, Procedure Use and Adherence /
Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l Implemented Dynamic Learning Activities l Implemented new Observation program in September 2009 w Allowed better trending of data w Improved entry and monitoring process w Implemented at a fleet level w Implemented in-process Technical review observations w Improved Major Projects utilization of the observation program l Developed, proceduralized and implemented consistent HU clock reset criteria 7                        01/13/10 Enclosure 2
Work Management Activities, workbook l Implemented industry best practices Procedure Use


and Adherence standards into a fleet NGG procedure l Placekeeping requirements established for procedures and work orders l Developed and implemented a plan (resources &
Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l Communicated HU Excellence Plan site-wide l Established HU Program Oversight w HU Program Manager position reporting to Director of Site Operation w Human Performance Core Team lead by HU Program Manager as the implementation arm of the HUSC w Human Performance Steering Committee (HUSC) as the senior site management team w Review Boards w Shared learning through site and fleet communications w Nuclear Safety Review Committee standing agenda item l Established and communicated NGG Leadership Behaviors 8                          01/13/10 Enclosure 2


timeline) to accelerate upgr ade to site procedures and work off PRR backlog 01/13/10 10 Procedures Key Actions l Implemented a graded approach to planning to prompt more rigorous reviews for pre-defined work activities l Developed and implemented process for early identification of work activities requiring increased rigor reviews to confirm procedure adequacy l Established maintenance planning review committee l Proceduralized requirements for quality critical work tasks 01/13/10 11 Procedures Key Remaining Actions l Revise procedure writers guide to incorporate HU & industry best practices (Human factors) l Formalize the use of checklists for procedure
Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Remaining Actions l Develop supervisor training guideline to support line employee transition to supervision l Perform Self-Assessment of monthly observations in comparison to monthly Nuclear Condition Reports to evaluate effectiveness of identifying, coaching & correcting behaviors at a low threshold l Conduct a Supervisory effectiveness Self-Assessment l Implement a training strategy to improve performance of supplemental craft, supervision and supplemental project management oversight 9                    01/13/10 Enclosure 2


writers and procedure reviewers l Work the plan to accelerate upgrade to site  
Procedures Key Actions l 46 Key Actions l Site personnel completed an Adverse Human Performance Trend, Procedure Use and Adherence /
Work Management Activities, workbook l Implemented industry best practices Procedure Use and Adherence standards into a fleet NGG procedure l Placekeeping requirements established for procedures and work orders l Developed and implemented a plan (resources &
timeline) to accelerate upgrade to site procedures and work off PRR backlog 10                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


procedures and reduce PRR backlog l Conduct training on the Engineering Product
Procedures Key Actions l Implemented a graded approach to planning to prompt more rigorous reviews for pre-defined work activities l Developed and implemented process for early identification of work activities requiring increased rigor reviews to confirm procedure adequacy l Established maintenance planning review committee l Proceduralized requirements for quality critical work tasks 11                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


Quality procedure focusing on processes and  
Procedures Key Remaining Actions l Revise procedure writers guide to incorporate HU & industry best practices (Human factors) l Formalize the use of checklists for procedure writers and procedure reviewers l Work the plan to accelerate upgrade to site procedures and reduce PRR backlog l Conduct training on the Engineering Product Quality procedure focusing on processes and tools to improve quality 12                  01/13/10 Enclosure 2


tools to improve quality 01/13/10 12 Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Actions l 22 Key Actions l Risk significant activities identified, communicated, supervisor oversight  
Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Actions l 22 Key Actions l Risk significant activities identified, communicated, supervisor oversight established and specific mitigation measures put in place and discussed at the morning meetings l Developed and implemented procedure 0AP-060, Technical Risk/Rigor Risk Assessment l Implemented improvements to the Post Maintenance Testing process 13                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


established and specific mitigation measures
Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Actions l Implemented modification quality improvements l Revised BNP Integrated Scheduling procedure to include specific behavior changes that are expected for elevated risk activities l Implemented method to improve identification and evaluation of organizational contributors to events during Priority 1 and 2A investigations 14                01/13/10 Enclosure 2


put in place and discussed at the morning
Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Remaining Actions l Perform Self-Assessment on a site elevated risk activity/task including site behaviors, procedure compliance, and barriers put-in-place l Conduct a self-assessment on the implementation of AP-60, Technical Risk/Rigor Risk Assessment 15                    01/13/10 Enclosure 2


meetings l Developed and implemented procedure 0AP-060, Technical Risk/Rigor Risk Assessment l Implemented improvements to the Post Maintenance Testing process 01/13/10 13 Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Actions l Implemented modification quality improvements l Revised BNP Integrated Scheduling
Work Management Key Actions l 8 Key Actions l Strengthened requirements on written guidance required to manipulate equipment l Implemented Industry best practice for Skill of the Craft/Minor Maintenance work l Implemented OPS-NGGC-1308, Plant Status Control at BNP l Signage posted in plant to heighten awareness of work classifications and plant status control 16                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


procedure to include specific behavior changes that are expected for elevated risk activities l Implemented method to improve
Work Management Key Actions l Revised Work Management Process procedure to make it clear that changing status of Work Order tasks to finish and using lists to track items not completed is not allowed.
l Implemented Plant Labeling upgrade 17                        01/13/10 Enclosure 2


identification and evaluation of organizational contributors to events during Priority 1 and 2A investigations 01/13/10 14 Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Remaining Actions l Perform Self-Assessment on a site elevated risk activity/task including site behaviors, procedure compliance, and barriers put-in-place l Conduct a self-assessment on the
Work Management Key Remaining Actions l Complete plant labeling upgrade l Perform a site survey to verify knowledge level pertaining to the Work Management Process procedure requirements 18                  01/13/10 Enclosure 2


implementation of AP-60 , Technical Risk/Rigor Risk Assessment 01/13/10 15 Work Management Key Actions l 8 Key Actions l Strengthened requirements on written guidance required to manipulate equipment l Implemented Industry best practice for "Skill of
Results Human Performance Event Tree 19            01/13/10 Enclosure 2


the Craft"/Minor Maintenance work l Implemented OPS-NGGC-1308, Plant Status  
Results l Station HU Events: ~72% reduction in rate of site level HU events l Plant Status Control (PSC): ~50% reduction in rate of PSC events l Clearance Tagging: ~52% reduction in rate of tagging errors/precursor events 20                01/13/10 Enclosure 2


Control at BNP l Signage posted in plant to heighten awareness
Site Human Performance Events - 2009 December 2009 Performance Average Days    52.8 Days Since Last 47 Event December        0 Events Year to Date    6 Events 21              01/13/10 Enclosure 2


of work classifications and plant status control 01/13/10 16 Work Management Key Actions l Revised Work Management Process procedure to make it clear that changing status of Work Order tasks to finish
Status Control Events - 2009 Im pr ov in g
Pe rfo rm an c e Tr en d
22                                  01/13/10 Enclosure 2


and using lists to track items not completed is not
Clearance Tagging Events - 2009 45 40 35 30 25                                '.--- - -J-1 lnadequate Barrier Event Single Barrier Event 20                                        1 --  -;:.... Minor Event
                                      "---I 15              1 - - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _:-"              Precursor 10 5
o
~      Jan - Jul 23 Aug - Dec 01/13/10                Progress Energy Enclosure 2


allowed.l Implemented Plant Labeling upgrade 01/13/10 17 Work Management Key Remaining Actions l Complete plant labeling upgrade l Perform a site survey to verify knowledge level pertaining to the Work Management Process procedure requirements 01/13/10 18 Results Human Performance Event Tree 01/13/10 19 Results l Station HU Events: ~72% reduction in rate of site level HU events l Plant Status Control (PSC): ~50% reduction  
Results l Operations HU Clock resets: 38% reduction in reset rate l Maintenance HU Clock resets: 45%
reduction in reset rate l Engineering HU Clock resets: 28 % reduction in reset rate 24                01/13/10 Enclosure 2


in rate of PSC events l Clearance Tagging:  ~52% reduction in rate of  
Results l 68% reduction in Procedure Use and Adherence Nuclear Condition Reports (NCRs) l Improved identification of procedure quality issues due to increased focus on procedure use and adherence prior to causing an adverse condition/event w Procedure Backlog increase due to early identification of issues w Increased Observations showing individuals stopping when questions arise and getting the procedure/work order fixed w 35% Reduction in Procedure Adequacy NCRs 25                    01/13/10 Enclosure 2


tagging errors/precursor events 20 01/13/10 Site Human Performance Events -2009Average Days 52.8 Days Since Last Event 47 December Events 0 Year to Date Events 6 December 2009 Performance 01/13/10 21 Status Control Events -2009 I mprov ing Per for mance T rend 01/13/10 22 Clearance Tagging Events -2009 01/13/10 23 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o Jan -Jul '.-----J-1 lnadequate Barrier Event Single Barrier Event 1---;:.... Minor Event "---I 1---_________
Self Evaluation Roll-up Human Performance Im prov ing ce an rm rfo Pe d
:-" Precursor Aug -Dec Progress Energy Results l Operations HU Clock resets:  38% reduction in reset  rate l Maintenance HU Clock resets:  45%
en Tr 26                            01/13/10 Enclosure 2


reduction in reset rate l Engineering HU Clock resets:  28 % reduction
Procedure Related Events 6
5 4
3                                                                                  - Events
                                                                                    - Cycle 2
1 o
Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
    ~      ~      ~      ~      ~      ~      ~        ~      ~      ~
27                                      01/13/10              Progress Energy Enclosure 2


in reset rate 24 01/13/10 Results l 68% reduction in Procedure Use and Adherence Nuclear Condition Reports (NCRs) l Improved identification of procedure quality issues
Observations - 2009 Observed Stopping When Unsure 28              01/13/10 Enclosure 2


due to increased focus on procedure use and
Critical Observations Improvement Opportunities Percentage of observations performed containing Improvement Opportunities 44                                                                                        ~
43 42
                                              ~~
                                                ~C.e
                                ~~
41
~
:-i\'(\~
J 40
                                \~
R'(o l
39 38 37 38 Jan- Jul                                Aug- Dec 29                                01/13/10            Progress Energy Enclosure 2


adherence prior to causing an adverse condition/event w Procedure Backlog increase due to early identification of issues w Increased Observations showing individuals
Summary l We have identified, recognized, and have taken actions to address Human Performance l We have a comprehensive HU Excellence Plan l We have implemented timely and aggressive corrective actions l Metrics demonstrate actions taken are improving performance l Performance Improvement is institutionalized l Sustainability w Focus is on Leadership, Behaviors, and key Process Changes 30                      01/13/10 Enclosure 2


stopping when questions arise and getting the procedure/work order fixed w 35% Reduction in Procedure Adequacy NCRs 25 01/13/10 Self Evaluation Roll-up Human Performance Impr o vin g P e rform a n c e T r e n d 26 01/13/10 Procedure Related Events 01/13/10 27 6 5 4 3 -Events -Cycle 2 1 o Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Progress Energy Observations -2009 Observed Stopping When Unsure 01/13/10 28 Critical Observations Improvement Opportunities 01/13/10 29 44 4 3 42 41 -J 40 l 39 38 3 7 3 8 Percentage of observations performed containing Improvement Opportunities ;:-
Questions?
R'(o .-Jan-Jul Aug-De c Progress Energy Summary l We have identified, recognized, and have taken actions to address Human Performance l We have a comprehensive HU Excellence Plan l We have implemented timely and aggressive corrective actions l Metrics demonstrate actions taken are improving performance l Performance Improvement is institutionalized l Sustainability w Focus is on Leadership, Behaviors,  and key Process Changes 30 01/13/10 Questions?
31         01/13/10 Enclosure 2}}
31 01/13/10}}

Latest revision as of 05:35, 12 March 2020

Meeting Presentation Brunswick Nuclear Plant Human Performance
ML100150763
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/15/2010
From:
Nuclear Generation Group, Progress Energy Co
To:
NRC/RGN-II
Shared Package
ML100150733 List:
References
Download: ML100150763 (31)


Text

Brunswick Nuclear Plant Human Performance NRC Region II Visit January 14, 2010 Enclosure 2

Agenda l Human Performance (HU) Excellence Plan w Development w Inputs w Focus Areas l Focus Area Key Actions l Results l Summary 2 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

HU Excellence Plan Development l Benchmarked Industry l Established a Living Plan with action assignments tracked by the Corrective Action Program l Established Metrics to monitor effectiveness l Action assignments tracked in the Corrective Action Program l Plan reviewed by Fleet and INPO l Aligned Station through high visibility and consistent communication of the plan 3 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

HU Excellence Plan Inputs l Common Cause Analysis - 2008 w Risk Identification/Mitigation w Engineering Technical rigor w Equipment Reliability l Corrective Action Program Trend Reports l Site Level Human Performance Events l INPO Performance Indicators l NRC Cross Cutting Matrix 4 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

HU Excellence Plan Focus Areas l Focus Areas l Behavior Change and Reinforcement l Procedures l Risk Identification and Mitigation l Work Control l Key Enabler l Training 5 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l 17 Key actions l Increased First Line Supervisor oversight of field activities l Conducted Leadership Assessment l Conducted Accountability training to all site personnel l Site Leadership completed a Leadership workbook l Established Supervisor Steering committee l Enhanced oversight and training of Supplemental Personnel 6 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l Implemented Dynamic Learning Activities l Implemented new Observation program in September 2009 w Allowed better trending of data w Improved entry and monitoring process w Implemented at a fleet level w Implemented in-process Technical review observations w Improved Major Projects utilization of the observation program l Developed, proceduralized and implemented consistent HU clock reset criteria 7 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Actions l Communicated HU Excellence Plan site-wide l Established HU Program Oversight w HU Program Manager position reporting to Director of Site Operation w Human Performance Core Team lead by HU Program Manager as the implementation arm of the HUSC w Human Performance Steering Committee (HUSC) as the senior site management team w Review Boards w Shared learning through site and fleet communications w Nuclear Safety Review Committee standing agenda item l Established and communicated NGG Leadership Behaviors 8 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Behavior Change and Reinforcement Key Remaining Actions l Develop supervisor training guideline to support line employee transition to supervision l Perform Self-Assessment of monthly observations in comparison to monthly Nuclear Condition Reports to evaluate effectiveness of identifying, coaching & correcting behaviors at a low threshold l Conduct a Supervisory effectiveness Self-Assessment l Implement a training strategy to improve performance of supplemental craft, supervision and supplemental project management oversight 9 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Procedures Key Actions l 46 Key Actions l Site personnel completed an Adverse Human Performance Trend, Procedure Use and Adherence /

Work Management Activities, workbook l Implemented industry best practices Procedure Use and Adherence standards into a fleet NGG procedure l Placekeeping requirements established for procedures and work orders l Developed and implemented a plan (resources &

timeline) to accelerate upgrade to site procedures and work off PRR backlog 10 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Procedures Key Actions l Implemented a graded approach to planning to prompt more rigorous reviews for pre-defined work activities l Developed and implemented process for early identification of work activities requiring increased rigor reviews to confirm procedure adequacy l Established maintenance planning review committee l Proceduralized requirements for quality critical work tasks 11 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Procedures Key Remaining Actions l Revise procedure writers guide to incorporate HU & industry best practices (Human factors) l Formalize the use of checklists for procedure writers and procedure reviewers l Work the plan to accelerate upgrade to site procedures and reduce PRR backlog l Conduct training on the Engineering Product Quality procedure focusing on processes and tools to improve quality 12 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Actions l 22 Key Actions l Risk significant activities identified, communicated, supervisor oversight established and specific mitigation measures put in place and discussed at the morning meetings l Developed and implemented procedure 0AP-060, Technical Risk/Rigor Risk Assessment l Implemented improvements to the Post Maintenance Testing process 13 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Actions l Implemented modification quality improvements l Revised BNP Integrated Scheduling procedure to include specific behavior changes that are expected for elevated risk activities l Implemented method to improve identification and evaluation of organizational contributors to events during Priority 1 and 2A investigations 14 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Risk Identification and Mitigation Key Remaining Actions l Perform Self-Assessment on a site elevated risk activity/task including site behaviors, procedure compliance, and barriers put-in-place l Conduct a self-assessment on the implementation of AP-60, Technical Risk/Rigor Risk Assessment 15 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Work Management Key Actions l 8 Key Actions l Strengthened requirements on written guidance required to manipulate equipment l Implemented Industry best practice for Skill of the Craft/Minor Maintenance work l Implemented OPS-NGGC-1308, Plant Status Control at BNP l Signage posted in plant to heighten awareness of work classifications and plant status control 16 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Work Management Key Actions l Revised Work Management Process procedure to make it clear that changing status of Work Order tasks to finish and using lists to track items not completed is not allowed.

l Implemented Plant Labeling upgrade 17 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Work Management Key Remaining Actions l Complete plant labeling upgrade l Perform a site survey to verify knowledge level pertaining to the Work Management Process procedure requirements 18 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Results Human Performance Event Tree 19 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Results l Station HU Events: ~72% reduction in rate of site level HU events l Plant Status Control (PSC): ~50% reduction in rate of PSC events l Clearance Tagging: ~52% reduction in rate of tagging errors/precursor events 20 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Site Human Performance Events - 2009 December 2009 Performance Average Days 52.8 Days Since Last 47 Event December 0 Events Year to Date 6 Events 21 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Status Control Events - 2009 Im pr ov in g

Pe rfo rm an c e Tr en d

22 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Clearance Tagging Events - 2009 45 40 35 30 25 '.--- - -J-1 lnadequate Barrier Event Single Barrier Event 20 1 -- -;:.... Minor Event

"---I 15 1 - - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _:-" Precursor 10 5

o

~ Jan - Jul 23 Aug - Dec 01/13/10 Progress Energy Enclosure 2

Results l Operations HU Clock resets: 38% reduction in reset rate l Maintenance HU Clock resets: 45%

reduction in reset rate l Engineering HU Clock resets: 28 % reduction in reset rate 24 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Results l 68% reduction in Procedure Use and Adherence Nuclear Condition Reports (NCRs) l Improved identification of procedure quality issues due to increased focus on procedure use and adherence prior to causing an adverse condition/event w Procedure Backlog increase due to early identification of issues w Increased Observations showing individuals stopping when questions arise and getting the procedure/work order fixed w 35% Reduction in Procedure Adequacy NCRs 25 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Self Evaluation Roll-up Human Performance Im prov ing ce an rm rfo Pe d

en Tr 26 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Procedure Related Events 6

5 4

3 - Events

- Cycle 2

1 o

Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

27 01/13/10 Progress Energy Enclosure 2

Observations - 2009 Observed Stopping When Unsure 28 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Critical Observations Improvement Opportunities Percentage of observations performed containing Improvement Opportunities 44 ~

43 42

~~

~C.e

~~

41

~

-i\'(\~

J 40

\~

R'(o l

39 38 37 38 Jan- Jul Aug- Dec 29 01/13/10 Progress Energy Enclosure 2

Summary l We have identified, recognized, and have taken actions to address Human Performance l We have a comprehensive HU Excellence Plan l We have implemented timely and aggressive corrective actions l Metrics demonstrate actions taken are improving performance l Performance Improvement is institutionalized l Sustainability w Focus is on Leadership, Behaviors, and key Process Changes 30 01/13/10 Enclosure 2

Questions?

31 01/13/10 Enclosure 2