ML080860026: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| author name = Raghavan L | | author name = Raghavan L | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/WBSPB | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/WBSPB | ||
| addressee name = Bhatnagar A | | addressee name = Bhatnagar A | ||
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | | addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | ||
| docket = 05000391 | | docket = 05000391 | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Williams J | | contact person = Williams J, NRR/DORL/LPL3-2, 415-1470 | ||
| case reference number = TAC MD6311 | | case reference number = TAC MD6311 | ||
| package number = ML080860033 | | package number = ML080860033 | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:May 8, 2008 Mr. Ashok Bhatnagar Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Development and Construction Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN | {{#Wiki_filter:May 8, 2008 Mr. Ashok Bhatnagar Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Development and Construction Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 - ASSESSMENT OF REMAINING OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW SCOPE AND REQUESTS FOR ADDTIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MD6311) | WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 - ASSESSMENT OF REMAINING OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW SCOPE AND REQUESTS FOR ADDTIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MD6311) | ||
==Dear Mr. Bhatnagar:== | ==Dear Mr. Bhatnagar:== | ||
This letter forwards the Nuclear Regulatory | This letter forwards the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) initial assessment of the remaining operating license review scope for the Tennessee Valley Authoritys (TVAs) Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2. The NRC staff finds that many existing topics within the scope of licensing review have already been addressed. However, the staffs review to date does not completely agree with TVAs position regarding the status of all topics. The staff needs additional information from TVA to resolve differences between the NRC and TVA scope assessments. | ||
The staff has also determined that there are circumstances that could result in re-opening a previously reviewed topic. The attached assessment also outlines processes that should be applied to confirm the relevance of previously-completed NRC safety evaluations to the final WBN Unit 2 design, or identify topics that require supplemental review. The staff requests additional information regarding how TVA will complete this confirmation. | The staff has also determined that there are circumstances that could result in re-opening a previously reviewed topic. The attached assessment also outlines processes that should be applied to confirm the relevance of previously-completed NRC safety evaluations to the final WBN Unit 2 design, or identify topics that require supplemental review. The staff requests additional information regarding how TVA will complete this confirmation. | ||
NRC Assessment Results | NRC Assessment Results provides the staffs initial inventory of licensing issues that must be resolved to complete the operating license review for WBN Unit 2. The assessment is summarized in six tables. | ||
Table 1 describes the Table of Contents for the review, and is derived from the Table of Contents for NUREG-0847, | Table 1 describes the Table of Contents for the review, and is derived from the Table of Contents for NUREG-0847, Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, with sections added to address (1) generic issues, (2) topics identified from NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants such as the maintenance rule (Section 50.65 of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations), (3) TVA Nuclear Performance Plan topics, and (4) other issues, such as orders and conditions on the WBN Unit 1 license that will also be applied to Unit 2. | ||
Table 2 is based on this Table of Contents, and documents the staffs review of NUREG-0847 through Supplement 20, providing an initial determination as to whether a topic is open (with additional review required), or closed (review was documented in NUREG-0847 through Supplement 20). | |||
Ashok Bhatnagar Table 3 summarizes topics that the staff considers closed based on this initial review, while Table 4 summarizes open topics. The information presented in Tables 3 and 4 is the same as that given in Table 2. | |||
Ashok Bhatnagar Table 3 summarizes topics that the staff considers closed based on this initial review, while Table 4 summarizes open topics. The information presented in Tables 3 and 4 is the same as that given in Table 2. | In compiling the information presented in Tables 2, 3, and 4, the NRC staff reviewed only NUREG-0847 and its supplements; the staff did not review TVA submittals or other documents. | ||
In compiling the information presented in Tables 2, 3, and 4, the NRC staff reviewed only NUREG-0847 and its supplements; the staff did not review TVA submittals or other documents. The staff made conservative status assessments, keeping a topic open when the discussion within NUREG-0847 or its supplements did not clearly apply to WBN Unit 2. | The staff made conservative status assessments, keeping a topic open when the discussion within NUREG-0847 or its supplements did not clearly apply to WBN Unit 2. | ||
In many cases, the | In many cases, the staffs initial review concluded that topics remain open for WBN Unit 2, contrary to an assertion by TVA that those topics are closed per TVAs January 29, and March 13, 2008, submittals. Upon additional review of background documentation used in the initial review, the staff may conclude that some of those topics have actually been previously reviewed and resolved for WBN Unit 2. In other cases, TVA will need to submit additional information before a topic can be considered closed. Table 5 provides a list of topics where the NRCs initial conclusions do not match the status proposed by TVA. Table 6 lists topics considered open by the NRC staffs initial review where no submittal is planned by TVA, per its March 13, 2008, submittal. Additional information will be required to resolve the topics listed in Table 6. | ||
TVA has also provided information regarding the status of generic issues for WBN Unit 2 in two letters dated September 7, 2007, and in a letter dated March 20, 2008. The NRC | Table 7 lists NUREG-0847 supplements examined by the staff as part of this assessment. In comparing this list to information submitted by TVA, the staff found many cases where tables provided in TVAs January 29, and March 13, 2008, submittals did not identify every supplement to NUREG-0847 where a given topic was addressed. For example, TVAs March 13, 2008, submittal states that SER subsection 5.2.5, Reactor Coolant System Boundary Leakage Detection, was resolved in NUREG-0847 for both WBN units. The NRC staff determined that this topic is also addressed in NUREG-0847 Supplements 9, 11, and 12. Table 8 lists cases where the staff found that TVA did not identify all NUREG-0847 supplemental safety evaluation reports (SSERs) relevant to a particular topic. Additional information will be required to address these discrepancies. | ||
Methodology for Evaluation of Previously-Reviewed Topics | TVA has also provided information regarding the status of generic issues for WBN Unit 2 in two letters dated September 7, 2007, and in a letter dated March 20, 2008. The NRC staffs review of this information is not part of this assessment and will be completed at a later date. | ||
Methodology for Evaluation of Previously-Reviewed Topics Even if a topic was previously reviewed and closed within NUREG-0847 and its supplements, there are circumstances that could lead to revision of a previous evaluation, or a new evaluation being performed. Therefore, the assessment also outlines a methodology to screen previously-reviewed topics to determine if a revised safety evaluation is necessary. As the staffs review proceeds, this methodology may be revised. | |||
Even if a topic was previously reviewed and closed within NUREG-0847 and its supplements, there are circumstances that could lead to revision of a previous evaluation, or a new evaluation being performed. Therefore, the assessment also outlines a methodology to screen previously-reviewed topics to determine if a revised safety evaluation is necessary. As the | |||
Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) | Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) | ||
In the course of developing this assessment, the NRC staff has identified several areas where additional information will be needed from TVA to complete screening of review topics and to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. These requests for additional information are described in Attachment 2 of the Enclosure. | In the course of developing this assessment, the NRC staff has identified several areas where additional information will be needed from TVA to complete screening of review topics and to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. These requests for additional information are described in Attachment 2 of the Enclosure. | ||
Ashok Bhatnagar You should particularly note the last RAI, where the staff requests that TVA address all supplements to NUREG-0847 pertinent to a given topic in future revisions of the regulatory framework letter, updating the review status for WBN Unit 2, as necessary. The staff found that for many of the topics described by the NUREG-0847 table of contents, TVA did not identify all NUREG-0847 supplements affecting those topics. The staff expects TVA to ensure that its submittals thoroughly address all relevant licensing information. Please take appropriate corrective actions to ensure your future submittals address all relevant licensing information. | |||
We request that you respond to these requests or provide a schedule for your response within 30 days of the date of this letter. | |||
Please contact Joe Williams at 301-415-1470 or joseph.williams@nrc.gov if you have questions regarding this assessment. | Please contact Joe Williams at 301-415-1470 or joseph.williams@nrc.gov if you have questions regarding this assessment. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
L. Raghavan, Chief | /RA/ | ||
L. Raghavan, Chief Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391 | |||
Docket No. 50-391 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
cc w/encl: | Assessment of Remaining Review Scope cc w/encl: See next page | ||
Ashok Bhatnagar You should particularly note the last RAI, where the staff requests that TVA address all supplements to NUREG-0847 pertinent to a given topic in future revisions of the regulatory framework letter, updating the review status for WBN Unit 2, as necessary. The staff found that for many of the topics described by the NUREG-0847 table of contents, TVA did not identify all NUREG-0847 supplements affecting those topics. The staff expects TVA to ensure that its submittals thoroughly address all relevant licensing information. Please take appropriate corrective actions to ensure your future submittals address all relevant licensing information. | |||
We request that you respond to these requests or provide a schedule for your response within 30 days of the date of this letter. | |||
Please contact Joe Williams at 301-415-1470 or joseph.williams@nrc.gov if you have questions regarding this assessment. | Please contact Joe Williams at 301-415-1470 or joseph.williams@nrc.gov if you have questions regarding this assessment. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | |||
L. Raghavan, Chief Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Assessment of Remaining Review Scope cc w/encl: | Assessment of Remaining Review Scope cc w/encl: See next page Accession Number: PKG:ML080860033; LTR: ML080860026; ASSES: ML080860040; TABLE: ML081010116 | ||
* Via E-mail OFFICE WBN2/PM WBN2/LA AADB/BC AFPB/BC CPNB/BC CSGB/BC NAME JWilliams BClayton RTaylor AKlein* TChan* AHiser* | |||
DATE / /08 / /08 4/9/08 04/03/08 04/02/08 4/2/08 OFFICE CVIB/BC EEEB/BC EICB/BC EMCB/BC EQVB/BC IOLB/BC NAME MMitchell* GWilson* WKemper KManoly* DThatcher* NSalgado* | |||
DATE 04/04/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 04/07/08 04/04/08 OFFICE IRIB/BC ITSB/BC PFPB/BC SBPB/BC SCVB/BC SNPB/BC NAME TKobetz* RElliott ACosta* DHarrison* RDennig* AMendiola* | |||
DATE 04/07/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 04/04/08 04/02/08 OFFICE SRXB/BC NSIR/LIB/BC NSIR/RSPLB/BC OGC, NLO WBN2-BC CPTB/BC NAME GCranston* KWilliams* DHuyck* DRoth LRaghavan JMcHale* | |||
DATE 04/04/08 04/04/08 04/07/08 05/01/08 / /08 4/2/08 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
Letter to Ashok Bhatnagar from L. Raghavan dated | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 - ASSESSMENT OF REMAINING OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW SCOPE (TAC NO. MD6311) | WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 - ASSESSMENT OF REMAINING OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW SCOPE (TAC NO. MD6311) | ||
DISTRIBUTION: | DISTRIBUTION: | ||
PUBLIC RidsNrrPMJWilliams RidsNrrLABClayton L. Raghavan WBSPB r/f | PUBLIC RidsNrrPMJWilliams RidsNrrLABClayton L. Raghavan WBSPB r/f RidsAcrsAcrnw&mMailCenter RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsOgcRp RidsNrrAADB RidsNrrAFPB RidsNrrCPNB RidsNrrCPTB RidsNrrCSGB RidsNrrCVIB RidsNrrEEEB RidsNrrEICB RidsNrrEMCB RidsNrrEQVB RidsNrrIOLB RidsNrrIRIB RidsNrrITSB RidsNSIR-RSPLB RidsNSIR-LIB RidsNrrPFPB RidsNrrSBPB RidsNrrSCVB RidsNrrSNPB RidsNrrSRXB | ||
RidsAcrsAcrnw&mMailCenter RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsOgcRp RidsNrrAADB RidsNrrAFPB RidsNrrCPNB RidsNrrCPTB RidsNrrCSGB RidsNrrCVIB RidsNrrEEEB RidsNrrEICB RidsNrrEMCB RidsNrrEQVB RidsNrrIOLB RidsNrrIRIB RidsNrrITSB RidsNSIR-RSPLB RidsNSIR-LIB RidsNrrPFPB RidsNrrSBPB RidsNrrSCVB RidsNrrSNPB RidsNrrSRXB | |||
TABLES (8) | TABLES (8) | ||
REVIEW TOPICS FOR SAFETY EVALUATION WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 | REVIEW TOPICS FOR SAFETY EVALUATION WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 ATTACHMENT 1 | ||
ATTACHMENT 1 | |||
Ms. Ann P. Harris 341 Swing Loop Road Rockwood, TN | Ashok S. Bhatnagar Tennessee Valley Authority WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 cc: | ||
Mr. Gordon P. Arent Mr. John C. Fornicola, General Manager New Generation Licensing Manager Nuclear Assurance Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 5A Lookout Place 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 General Counsel Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority Watts Bar Unit 2 6A West Tower Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 400 West Summit Hill Drive Tennessee Valley Authority Knoxville, TN 37902 P.O. Box 2000, EQB 1B Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Michael J. Lorek, Plant Manager Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Senior Resident Inspector Tennessee Valley Authority Watts Bar Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 2000 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Spring City, TN 37381 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Lawrence E. Nanney, Director Tennessee Dept. of Environmental Health & | |||
Mr. Michael K. Brandon, Manager Conservation Licensing and Industry Affairs Division of Radiological Health Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 3rd Floor, L&C Annex Tennessee Valley Authority 401 Church Street P.O. Box 2000 Nashville, TN 37243-1532 Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Larry E. Nicholson, General Manager Mr. William R. Campbell, Jr. Performance Improvement Chief Nuclear Officer and Tennessee Valley Authority Executive Vice President 3R Lookout Place Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street 3R Lookout Place Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Ms. Ann P. Harris 341 Swing Loop Road County Executive Rockwood, TN 37854 375 Church Street Suite 215 Dayton, TN 37321 County Mayor P. O. Box 156 Decatur, TN 37322}} |
Latest revision as of 18:24, 14 November 2019
ML080860026 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Watts Bar |
Issue date: | 05/08/2008 |
From: | Raghavan L NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/WBSPB |
To: | Bhatnagar A Tennessee Valley Authority |
Williams J, NRR/DORL/LPL3-2, 415-1470 | |
Shared Package | |
ML080860033 | List: |
References | |
TAC MD6311 | |
Download: ML080860026 (20) | |
Text
May 8, 2008 Mr. Ashok Bhatnagar Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Development and Construction Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 - ASSESSMENT OF REMAINING OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW SCOPE AND REQUESTS FOR ADDTIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MD6311)
Dear Mr. Bhatnagar:
This letter forwards the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) initial assessment of the remaining operating license review scope for the Tennessee Valley Authoritys (TVAs) Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2. The NRC staff finds that many existing topics within the scope of licensing review have already been addressed. However, the staffs review to date does not completely agree with TVAs position regarding the status of all topics. The staff needs additional information from TVA to resolve differences between the NRC and TVA scope assessments.
The staff has also determined that there are circumstances that could result in re-opening a previously reviewed topic. The attached assessment also outlines processes that should be applied to confirm the relevance of previously-completed NRC safety evaluations to the final WBN Unit 2 design, or identify topics that require supplemental review. The staff requests additional information regarding how TVA will complete this confirmation.
NRC Assessment Results provides the staffs initial inventory of licensing issues that must be resolved to complete the operating license review for WBN Unit 2. The assessment is summarized in six tables.
Table 1 describes the Table of Contents for the review, and is derived from the Table of Contents for NUREG-0847, Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, with sections added to address (1) generic issues, (2) topics identified from NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants such as the maintenance rule (Section 50.65 of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations), (3) TVA Nuclear Performance Plan topics, and (4) other issues, such as orders and conditions on the WBN Unit 1 license that will also be applied to Unit 2.
Table 2 is based on this Table of Contents, and documents the staffs review of NUREG-0847 through Supplement 20, providing an initial determination as to whether a topic is open (with additional review required), or closed (review was documented in NUREG-0847 through Supplement 20).
Ashok Bhatnagar Table 3 summarizes topics that the staff considers closed based on this initial review, while Table 4 summarizes open topics. The information presented in Tables 3 and 4 is the same as that given in Table 2.
In compiling the information presented in Tables 2, 3, and 4, the NRC staff reviewed only NUREG-0847 and its supplements; the staff did not review TVA submittals or other documents.
The staff made conservative status assessments, keeping a topic open when the discussion within NUREG-0847 or its supplements did not clearly apply to WBN Unit 2.
In many cases, the staffs initial review concluded that topics remain open for WBN Unit 2, contrary to an assertion by TVA that those topics are closed per TVAs January 29, and March 13, 2008, submittals. Upon additional review of background documentation used in the initial review, the staff may conclude that some of those topics have actually been previously reviewed and resolved for WBN Unit 2. In other cases, TVA will need to submit additional information before a topic can be considered closed. Table 5 provides a list of topics where the NRCs initial conclusions do not match the status proposed by TVA. Table 6 lists topics considered open by the NRC staffs initial review where no submittal is planned by TVA, per its March 13, 2008, submittal. Additional information will be required to resolve the topics listed in Table 6.
Table 7 lists NUREG-0847 supplements examined by the staff as part of this assessment. In comparing this list to information submitted by TVA, the staff found many cases where tables provided in TVAs January 29, and March 13, 2008, submittals did not identify every supplement to NUREG-0847 where a given topic was addressed. For example, TVAs March 13, 2008, submittal states that SER subsection 5.2.5, Reactor Coolant System Boundary Leakage Detection, was resolved in NUREG-0847 for both WBN units. The NRC staff determined that this topic is also addressed in NUREG-0847 Supplements 9, 11, and 12. Table 8 lists cases where the staff found that TVA did not identify all NUREG-0847 supplemental safety evaluation reports (SSERs) relevant to a particular topic. Additional information will be required to address these discrepancies.
TVA has also provided information regarding the status of generic issues for WBN Unit 2 in two letters dated September 7, 2007, and in a letter dated March 20, 2008. The NRC staffs review of this information is not part of this assessment and will be completed at a later date.
Methodology for Evaluation of Previously-Reviewed Topics Even if a topic was previously reviewed and closed within NUREG-0847 and its supplements, there are circumstances that could lead to revision of a previous evaluation, or a new evaluation being performed. Therefore, the assessment also outlines a methodology to screen previously-reviewed topics to determine if a revised safety evaluation is necessary. As the staffs review proceeds, this methodology may be revised.
Requests for Additional Information (RAIs)
In the course of developing this assessment, the NRC staff has identified several areas where additional information will be needed from TVA to complete screening of review topics and to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. These requests for additional information are described in Attachment 2 of the Enclosure.
Ashok Bhatnagar You should particularly note the last RAI, where the staff requests that TVA address all supplements to NUREG-0847 pertinent to a given topic in future revisions of the regulatory framework letter, updating the review status for WBN Unit 2, as necessary. The staff found that for many of the topics described by the NUREG-0847 table of contents, TVA did not identify all NUREG-0847 supplements affecting those topics. The staff expects TVA to ensure that its submittals thoroughly address all relevant licensing information. Please take appropriate corrective actions to ensure your future submittals address all relevant licensing information.
We request that you respond to these requests or provide a schedule for your response within 30 days of the date of this letter.
Please contact Joe Williams at 301-415-1470 or joseph.williams@nrc.gov if you have questions regarding this assessment.
Sincerely,
/RA/
L. Raghavan, Chief Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391
Enclosure:
Assessment of Remaining Review Scope cc w/encl: See next page
Ashok Bhatnagar You should particularly note the last RAI, where the staff requests that TVA address all supplements to NUREG-0847 pertinent to a given topic in future revisions of the regulatory framework letter, updating the review status for WBN Unit 2, as necessary. The staff found that for many of the topics described by the NUREG-0847 table of contents, TVA did not identify all NUREG-0847 supplements affecting those topics. The staff expects TVA to ensure that its submittals thoroughly address all relevant licensing information. Please take appropriate corrective actions to ensure your future submittals address all relevant licensing information.
We request that you respond to these requests or provide a schedule for your response within 30 days of the date of this letter.
Please contact Joe Williams at 301-415-1470 or joseph.williams@nrc.gov if you have questions regarding this assessment.
Sincerely,
/RA/
L. Raghavan, Chief Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391
Enclosure:
Assessment of Remaining Review Scope cc w/encl: See next page Accession Number: PKG:ML080860033; LTR: ML080860026; ASSES: ML080860040; TABLE: ML081010116
- Via E-mail OFFICE WBN2/PM WBN2/LA AADB/BC AFPB/BC CPNB/BC CSGB/BC NAME JWilliams BClayton RTaylor AKlein* TChan* AHiser*
DATE / /08 / /08 4/9/08 04/03/08 04/02/08 4/2/08 OFFICE CVIB/BC EEEB/BC EICB/BC EMCB/BC EQVB/BC IOLB/BC NAME MMitchell* GWilson* WKemper KManoly* DThatcher* NSalgado*
DATE 04/04/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 04/07/08 04/04/08 OFFICE IRIB/BC ITSB/BC PFPB/BC SBPB/BC SCVB/BC SNPB/BC NAME TKobetz* RElliott ACosta* DHarrison* RDennig* AMendiola*
DATE 04/07/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 4/9/08 04/04/08 04/02/08 OFFICE SRXB/BC NSIR/LIB/BC NSIR/RSPLB/BC OGC, NLO WBN2-BC CPTB/BC NAME GCranston* KWilliams* DHuyck* DRoth LRaghavan JMcHale*
DATE 04/04/08 04/04/08 04/07/08 05/01/08 / /08 4/2/08 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Letter to Ashok Bhatnagar from L. Raghavan dated
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 - ASSESSMENT OF REMAINING OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW SCOPE (TAC NO. MD6311)
DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsNrrPMJWilliams RidsNrrLABClayton L. Raghavan WBSPB r/f RidsAcrsAcrnw&mMailCenter RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsOgcRp RidsNrrAADB RidsNrrAFPB RidsNrrCPNB RidsNrrCPTB RidsNrrCSGB RidsNrrCVIB RidsNrrEEEB RidsNrrEICB RidsNrrEMCB RidsNrrEQVB RidsNrrIOLB RidsNrrIRIB RidsNrrITSB RidsNSIR-RSPLB RidsNSIR-LIB RidsNrrPFPB RidsNrrSBPB RidsNrrSCVB RidsNrrSNPB RidsNrrSRXB
TABLES (8)
REVIEW TOPICS FOR SAFETY EVALUATION WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 ATTACHMENT 1
Ashok S. Bhatnagar Tennessee Valley Authority WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 cc:
Mr. Gordon P. Arent Mr. John C. Fornicola, General Manager New Generation Licensing Manager Nuclear Assurance Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 5A Lookout Place 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 General Counsel Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority Watts Bar Unit 2 6A West Tower Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 400 West Summit Hill Drive Tennessee Valley Authority Knoxville, TN 37902 P.O. Box 2000, EQB 1B Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Michael J. Lorek, Plant Manager Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Senior Resident Inspector Tennessee Valley Authority Watts Bar Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 2000 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Spring City, TN 37381 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Lawrence E. Nanney, Director Tennessee Dept. of Environmental Health &
Mr. Michael K. Brandon, Manager Conservation Licensing and Industry Affairs Division of Radiological Health Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 3rd Floor, L&C Annex Tennessee Valley Authority 401 Church Street P.O. Box 2000 Nashville, TN 37243-1532 Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Larry E. Nicholson, General Manager Mr. William R. Campbell, Jr. Performance Improvement Chief Nuclear Officer and Tennessee Valley Authority Executive Vice President 3R Lookout Place Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street 3R Lookout Place Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Ms. Ann P. Harris 341 Swing Loop Road County Executive Rockwood, TN 37854 375 Church Street Suite 215 Dayton, TN 37321 County Mayor P. O. Box 156 Decatur, TN 37322