|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 02/16/2007 | | | issue date = 02/16/2007 |
| | title = 2007 Emergency Preparedness and Incident Response Public Meeting: Status of the EP Threat Based Project, 2/16/07 | | | title = 2007 Emergency Preparedness and Incident Response Public Meeting: Status of the EP Threat Based Project, 2/16/07 |
| | author name = McCain S | | | author name = Mccain S |
| | author affiliation = Exelon Nuclear, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) | | | author affiliation = Exelon Nuclear, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) |
| | addressee name = | | | addressee name = |
Line 15: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:2007 NRC Counterpart Meeting Status of the EP Threat Based Drill Project Scott McCain Midwest Corporate EP Manager Exelon Nuclear February 16 th , 2007 1 Recap From 2006 MeetingComplete 4 th tabletop at VY Feb-06.Conduct drill at Callaway Mar-06.Complete new NEI guidance document.Submit to NRC and FEMA for endorsement.Provide industry workshop at NEI EP Forum. | | {{#Wiki_filter:2007 NRC Counterpart Meeting Status of the EP Threat Based Drill Project Scott McCain Midwest Corporate EP Manager Exelon Nuclear February 16th, 2007 |
| 2 Current Status of the ProjectPhase I & II -Conducted tabletop and integrated drills to develop, refine and validate new onsite and offsite guidance and objectives.
| |
| -Tabletops held at Diablo Canyon (Air), Duane Arnold (Land), North Anna (Air, Land and Water), Vermont Yankee (Land).
| |
| -Integrated drill was held at Callaway (Land).
| |
| -16 utilities representing 51 sites (77% of NPPs) and 12 States (39% of the states with NPPs) participated in developing the guidance.Phase III -3 year period for industry threat drills (09/2006).
| |
| -Industry requested NRC/FEMA endorsement of guidance.
| |
| -NRC and FEMA currently part of joint scenario working group.Phase IV -Incorporation of threat drills into the evaluated exercise program [End State].
| |
| 3Arkansas Nuclear (Fall)River Bend (Fall)
| |
| Clinton (10/14/09)Cooper (TBD)Fitz/ Nine Mi Pt (Fall)Watts Bar (11/05/08)Pilgrim (Fall)Davis-Besse(11/13/08)
| |
| Grand Gulf (4Q)Waterford (Dec)
| |
| Wolf Creek (4Q)Surry (12/02/08)Three Mile Island (Oct)Monticello (12/03/08)Calvert Cliffs (10/20/08)Columbia (10/23/07)Susquehanna (11/13/07) 4QOconee(Jul-09)Sequoyah(08/17/09)D.C. Cook (3Q)Comanche Peak (8/20/08)Fort Calhoun (3Q)Shearon-Harris (Sep)Ginna(3Q)Summer (Sep)
| |
| Hatch (3Q)Oyster Creek (Sep)Robinson (Aug)Kewaunee (09/09/08)Braidwood (07/11/07)Brunswick (07/17/07)Prairie Island (07/24/07)
| |
| Fermi(08/20/07)
| |
| Point Beach (08/29/07)Perry (09/12/07) 3QCrystal River (1-2Q)Millstone (2Q)LaSalle (04/29/09)Peach Bottom (May)South Texas (05/19/09)Salem / Hope Cr (05/18/09)Catawba (06/23/09)Limerick (04/12/08)McGuire (May)
| |
| SanOnofre(May)Browns Ferry (05/14/08)Dresden (06/18/08)Quad Cites (04/04/07)Vogtle(05/23/07)
| |
| Seabrook (06/19/07) 2QBeaver Valley (Jan)
| |
| St.Lucie(Feb)Farley (Mar)Turkey Point (Feb)Byron (02/21/08)Palo Verde (03/05/08)Palisades (03/08/08) 1Q200920082007 4 Scenario Development WorkshopHosted by Region III RUG at Exelon Chicago headquarters on February 13.Agenda focus was for utility and offsite scenario developers.
| |
| -Project history
| |
| -Detailed scenario development and conduct session
| |
| -Lessons Learned process
| |
| -Offsite agency coordination and funding82 utility, state and local planners attended.
| |
| 5Jan-06 Industry ConcernsPrompt review and endorse ment by NRC and FEMA.
| |
| This includes relaxing the requirement of an offsite radiological release for exercises.Defining the scope of an EP Security exercise such that it is considered a "meaningful event" to allow participation credit [successfully dispositioned
| |
| ].Scope limitations to ERO actions. Onsite and offsite security forces are specifically tested and evaluated under different venues (such as FoF).Single licensee inspection evaluation. Part 1 objectives fall under the exercise or FoFevals
| |
| [successfully dispositioned
| |
| ].
| |
| 6 Today's Industry ConcernsStill looking for prompt review and endorsement by NRC and FEMA. This includes consideration to vary the requirement for an offsit e radiological release in exercises.FEMA participation has primarily been as observers in the pilot drills. No solid understand ing of the federal response plans and processes by utility and state.Scope creep of the extent of play (security force activities, site actions through an attack, radhazards) 7 NEI 06-04 Scenario AnatomyA:Starts with normal plant operations and proceeds up to the point that a threat event occurs (Part 1).B:Starts with the event (plane crashes, bomb explodes, attack force crosses boundary) and ends when the onsite threat has been cleared (FoFExercises).C:Starts with ERO staged and/or response facilities activated and ends with the completion of the drill objectives (Part 2).
| |
| Event Initiation Threat Met and SecuredPersonnel Injury and Site Damage ResponseABC 8Drill Design -Scope/ObjectivesMain Objectives 1.Mitigation 2.Unified command / communications 3.Release/Protective measure considerations 4.Public Information 5.Remote / alternate ERFs 6.Multi-casualty medical response 7.Large-scale/area fire 8.50.54(x) activities (SAM, security) 9.INS considerations 10.Crime scene considerationsMain Objectives 1.Classification/Notification 2.Onsite protective actions 3.Augmentation logistics 4.Initial operator plant control actions 5.ERO response logistics 6.Offsite initial response/resources 7.Security LLEA interfaceScopeLarge-scale post event response based on significant damage caused by a threat-related event.ScopeIntegrated EP and Offsite initial response to a threat-related event.Post Event Response (Part 2)Initial Event Response (Part 1) 9Drill Design-Main DifferencesCoordination and participation of the State and local agencies is far beyond the scope of any current routine exercise -EMA REP is only a portion of this event.While the main focus of the Phase III threat scenario is not on a radiological release nor offsite protective actions, conditions would still involve the thought and decision processes and procedures for these
| |
|
| |
|
| activities. | | Recap From 2006 Meeting Complete 4th tabletop at VY Feb-06. |
| 10 Threat Objectives BasesTiered hierarchy based on §50.47(b) Planning Standardsplus mitigation.Objectivesare organized within the categories of the planning standards. | | Conduct drill at Callaway Mar-06. |
| -FEMA EEM, NUREG-0654 and IP 82302 used as templatesDemonstration Criteria, the specific performance evaluation elements, were derived from many sources. | | Complete new NEI guidance document. |
| -RIS 04-15, EP Lessons -Post 9/11 | | Submit to NRC and FEMA for endorsement. |
| -71114.07, FoF IP | | Provide industry workshop at NEI EP Forum. |
| -ICM Order, B.5.b section | | 1 |
| -Several 2005 Advisories | | |
| -Pilot tabletops and drillDemonstration CriteriaFacility ObjectivesOverall Objectives PS RSPS 11 Lessons LearnedThere is significantly more scenario development effort involvedin creating the threat drills. | | Current Status of the Project Phase I & II - Conducted tabletop and integrated drills to develop, refine and validate new onsite and offsite guidance and objectives. |
| -Development team members are needed from each offsite agency. | | - Tabletops held at Diablo Canyon (Air), Duane Arnold (Land), North Anna (Air, Land and Water), Vermont Yankee (Land). |
| -Outreach and inclusion of State agencies outside REP/EM are necessary (Terrorism or Homeland Security divisions).A key player tabletop or similar venue prior the full ERF threatdrill (to identify communications issues, vague procedure instructionsand inapplicable action steps) is highly recommended.Integration of Unified Area Command center is not well defined.Utility employees are not familiar/proficient with onsite protective actions and communications during threat scenarios. | | - Integrated drill was held at Callaway (Land). |
| NOTE:NEI is maintaining a website for collecting and communicating Phase III onsite and offsite lessons Learned.
| | - 16 utilities representing 51 sites (77% of NPPs) and 12 States (39% |
| 12 Lessons LearnedTraining and drills for response to, staffing of and operations from backup ERFs need to be more formally conducted to establish a minimum level of proficiency in this area.Sites with nearby EOF and JIC facilities could have ERO mobilization issues depending on the time of day a given threat scenario takes place.Utility employees are not familiar/proficient with onsite protective actions and communications during threat scenarios.Time jump considerations for take cover and restored movement within the site have not been thoroughly considered in several of the personnel attack scenarios.
| | of the states with NPPs) participated in developing the guidance. |
| 13 Discussion}} | | Phase III - 3 year period for industry threat drills (09/2006). |
| | - Industry requested NRC/FEMA endorsement of guidance. |
| | - NRC and FEMA currently part of joint scenario working group. |
| | Phase IV - Incorporation of threat drills into the evaluated exercise program [End State]. |
| | 2 |
| | |
| | 2007 2008 2009 Turkey Point (Feb) Beaver Valley (Jan) |
| | Byron (02/21/08) St. Lucie (Feb) 1Q Palo Verde (03/05/08) Farley (Mar) |
| | Palisades (03/08/08) |
| | Quad Cites (04/04/07) Limerick (04/12/08) Crystal River (1-2Q) |
| | Vogtle (05/23/07) McGuire (May) Millstone (2Q) |
| | Seabrook (06/19/07) San Onofre (May) LaSalle (04/29/09) 2Q Browns Ferry (05/14/08) Peach Bottom (May) |
| | Dresden (06/18/08) South Texas (05/19/09) |
| | Salem / Hope Cr (05/18/09) |
| | Catawba (06/23/09) |
| | Braidwood (07/11/07) D.C. Cook (3Q) Comanche Peak (8/20/08) Oconee (Jul-09) |
| | Brunswick (07/17/07) Fort Calhoun (3Q) Shearon-Harris (Sep) Sequoyah (08/17/09) |
| | Prairie Island (07/24/07) Ginna (3Q) Summer (Sep) 3Q Fermi (08/20/07) Hatch (3Q) Oyster Creek (Sep) |
| | Point Beach (08/29/07) Robinson (Aug) Kewaunee (09/09/08) |
| | Perry (09/12/07) |
| | Columbia (10/23/07) Fitz / Nine Mi Pt (Fall) Watts Bar (11/05/08) Arkansas Nuclear (Fall) |
| | Susquehanna (11/13/07) Pilgrim (Fall) Davis-Besse (11/13/08) River Bend (Fall) |
| | Grand Gulf (4Q) Waterford (Dec) Clinton (10/14/09) 4Q Wolf Creek (4Q) Surry (12/02/08) Cooper (TBD) |
| | Three Mile Island (Oct) Monticello (12/03/08) |
| | Calvert Cliffs (10/20/08) 3 |
| | |
| | Scenario Development Workshop Hosted by Region III RUG at Exelon Chicago headquarters on February 13. |
| | Agenda focus was for utility and offsite scenario developers. |
| | - Project history |
| | - Detailed scenario development and conduct session |
| | - Lessons Learned process |
| | - Offsite agency coordination and funding 82 utility, state and local planners attended. |
| | 4 |
| | |
| | Jan-06 Industry Concerns Prompt review and endorsement by NRC and FEMA. |
| | This includes relaxing the requirement of an offsite radiological release for exercises. |
| | Defining the scope of an EP Security exercise such that it is considered a meaningful event to allow participation credit [successfully dispositioned]. |
| | Scope limitations to ERO actions. Onsite and offsite security forces are specifically tested and evaluated under different venues (such as FoF). |
| | Single licensee inspection evaluation. Part 1 objectives fall under the exercise or FoF evals |
| | [successfully dispositioned]. |
| | 5 |
| | |
| | Today's Industry Concerns Still looking for prompt review and endorsement by NRC and FEMA. This includes consideration to vary the requirement for an offsite radiological release in exercises. |
| | FEMA participation has primarily been as observers in the pilot drills. |
| | No solid understanding of the federal response plans and processes by utility and state. |
| | Scope creep of the extent of play (security force activities, site actions through an attack, rad hazards) 6 |
| | |
| | NEI 06-04 Scenario Anatomy Event Threat Met Personnel Injury and Site Initiation and Secured Damage Response A B C A: Starts with normal plant operations and proceeds up to the point that a threat event occurs (Part 1). |
| | B: Starts with the event (plane crashes, bomb explodes, attack force crosses boundary) and ends when the onsite threat has been cleared (FoF Exercises). |
| | C: Starts with ERO staged and/or response facilities activated and ends with the completion of the drill objectives (Part 2). |
| | 7 |
| | |
| | Drill Design - Scope/Objectives Initial Event Response (Part 1) Post Event Response (Part 2) |
| | Scope Scope Integrated EP and Offsite initial response Large-scale post event response based on to a threat-related event. significant damage caused by a threat-related event. |
| | Main Objectives Main Objectives |
| | : 1. Classification/Notification 1. Mitigation |
| | : 2. Onsite protective actions 2. Unified command / communications |
| | : 3. Augmentation logistics 3. Release/Protective measure |
| | : 4. Initial operator plant control actions considerations |
| | : 5. ERO response logistics 4. Public Information |
| | : 6. Offsite initial response/resources 5. Remote / alternate ERFs |
| | : 7. Security LLEA interface 6. Multi-casualty medical response |
| | : 7. Large-scale/area fire |
| | : 8. 50.54(x) activities (SAM, security) |
| | : 9. INS considerations |
| | : 10. Crime scene considerations 8 |
| | |
| | Drill Design - Main Differences Coordination and participation of the State and local agencies is far beyond the scope of any current routine exercise - EMA REP is only a portion of this event. |
| | While the main focus of the Phase III threat scenario is not on a radiological release nor offsite protective actions, conditions would still involve the thought and decision processes and procedures for these activities. |
| | 9 |
| | |
| | Threat Objectives Bases Tiered hierarchy based on §50.47(b) |
| | Planning Standards plus mitigation. |
| | Objectives are organized within the categories of the planning standards. |
| | PS |
| | - FEMA EEM, NUREG-0654 and IP 82302 RSPS used as templates Demonstration Criteria, the specific performance evaluation elements, were Overall Objectives derived from many sources. |
| | - RIS 04-15, EP Lessons - Post 9/11 Facility Objectives |
| | - 71114.07, FoF IP |
| | - ICM Order, B.5.b section Demonstration Criteria |
| | - Several 2005 Advisories |
| | - Pilot tabletops and drill 10 |
| | |
| | Lessons Learned NOTE: NEI is maintaining a website for collecting and communicating Phase III onsite and offsite lessons Learned. |
| | There is significantly more scenario development effort involved in creating the threat drills. |
| | - Development team members are needed from each offsite agency. |
| | - Outreach and inclusion of State agencies outside REP/EM are necessary (Terrorism or Homeland Security divisions). |
| | A key player tabletop or similar venue prior the full ERF threat drill (to identify communications issues, vague procedure instructions and inapplicable action steps) is highly recommended. |
| | Integration of Unified Area Command center is not well defined. |
| | Utility employees are not familiar/proficient with onsite protective actions and communications during threat scenarios. |
| | 11 |
| | |
| | Lessons Learned Training and drills for response to, staffing of and operations from backup ERFs need to be more formally conducted to establish a minimum level of proficiency in this area. |
| | Sites with nearby EOF and JIC facilities could have ERO mobilization issues depending on the time of day a given threat scenario takes place. |
| | Utility employees are not familiar/proficient with onsite protective actions and communications during threat scenarios. |
| | Time jump considerations for take cover and restored movement within the site have not been thoroughly considered in several of the personnel attack scenarios. |
| | 12 |
| | |
| | Discussion 13}} |
|
---|
Category:Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts
MONTHYEARML24267A0522024-09-24024 September 2024 Standby Gas Treatment Planned Amendment Preapplication Meeting Presentation ML24232A2052024-08-12012 August 2024 Presentation Slides for Dresden End-of-Cycle Meeting ML24172A1092024-08-0707 August 2024 Scoping Power Point Presentation ML24200A2312024-07-22022 July 2024 Constellations Pre-Submittal Meeting Presentation About Peach Bottom ECCS Compensated Level System Replacement Project - July 22, 2024 ML24137A1882024-05-16016 May 2024 Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Ny/Nj Nuclear Power Plants - NRC Presentation Slides ML24134A2032024-05-14014 May 2024 Lessons Learned for ECCS Digital I&C License Amendment - Rev 0 ML24131A1282024-05-14014 May 2024 Lessons Learned for ECCS Digital I&C License Amendment ML24121A1862024-05-14014 May 2024 Attachment 3: Peach Bottom ECCS Compensated Level System Replacement Project Presentation Material (Non-Proprietary Information) ML24100A7672024-04-11011 April 2024 Meeting Slides - Preapplication with Constellation on Planned Fleet Alternative Request to Adopt OMN-2 ML24089A2612024-04-0909 April 2024 Slides - Constellation - Pre-Application Regarding Hooded Masks 4/9/2024 Meeting Slides (L-2024-LLM-0041) ML24029A1742024-01-30030 January 2024 Constellation Pre-Application January 30, 2024, Meeting Slides - Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-932, Alternative Requirements for Acceptance of Containment Base Metal Corrosion or Erosion ML23317A0712023-11-14014 November 2023 NRC Pre-Submittal Meeting on November 14th, 2023 - TSTF-591 and Selected 50.69 License Condition Updates (EPID L-2023-LLM-0098) (Slides) ML23255A1042023-08-11011 August 2023 Slides - Constellation - Pre-Application EP 9/18/2023 Draft CEG Presubmittal SG Performance Monitoring Plan Meeting Handout ML23221A2432023-08-10010 August 2023 Final Summer 2023 Confirmatory Survey Criteria ML23170A0082023-06-29029 June 2023 Decommissioning Presentation for NRC Pre-submittal Meeting, June 29, 2023 ML23173A0462023-06-28028 June 2023 DNPS SLR Pre-submittal Meeting Presentation Rev. 1 ML23173A0472023-06-28028 June 2023 SLRA - NRC Presubmittal Meeting Slides - 6-28-23 ML23145A1322023-06-27027 June 2023 June 27, 2023, Dresden Nuclear Power Station Subsequent License Renewal Environmental Pre-application Public Meeting - Constellation Slides ML23165A0242023-06-27027 June 2023 June 27, 2023, Dresden Nuclear Power Station Subsequent License Renewal Environmental Pre-application Public Meeting - NRC Slides ML23157A0352023-06-0606 June 2023 Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Ny/Nj Nuclear Power Plants - NRC Presentation Slides ML23094A1492023-04-11011 April 2023 Licensee Presentation on Whr Exemption Request for Public Meeting on April 11, 2023 ML23076A0442023-03-16016 March 2023 Pb U2 Scram Barrier Presentation KT Session ML23055A2712023-03-0202 March 2023 March 2, 2023, Preapplication Meeting to Discuss Planned Amendments to Adopt TSTF-505 and 10 CFR 50.69 (EPID L-2023-LRM-0007) - Slides ML23076A2822023-02-23023 February 2023 Licensee Presentation on Defense-in-Depth Process ML23076A2812023-02-23023 February 2023 Licensee Presentation on Pressure Boundary Process ML23053A1562023-02-23023 February 2023 NRC Presentation Slides for Public Meeting on February 23, 2023 - 10 CFR 50.69 Alternate Processes License Amendment Request Preliminary Partial Denial ML23006A2572023-01-10010 January 2023 Digital Modernization Project Installation Support License Amendment Request and Exemption Request Presentation - January 10, 2023 (EPID L-2022-LRM-0099) (Slides) ML22347A1532022-12-13013 December 2022 Public Meeting Presentation, December 15, 2022 Di&C License Amendment Request ML22319A0012022-11-14014 November 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, Llc'S Presentation for November 10, 2022 Public Meeting with NRC ML22312A4402022-11-10010 November 2022 Public Meeting with Constellation About Acceptance Review: Status of NRC Staff'S Acceptance Review of the Limerick Digital Instrumentation and Controls License Amendment Request ML22311A5112022-11-0707 November 2022 Pool Swell License - Amendment Request ML22250A4372022-09-0808 September 2022 NRC Staff'S Presentation for September 8, 2022 Partially Closed Public Meeting with Constellation - Review Planning and Tentative Review Timeline ML22249A0972022-09-0808 September 2022 Constellation'S Open Presentation for September 8, 2022 Partially Closed Public Meeting ML22249A2202022-09-0606 September 2022 Constellation'S Non-Proprietary Presentation for Limerick Generating Station Digital Modernization Project LAR Pre-submittal Meeting September 8, 2022 ML22164A8082022-06-13013 June 2022 Westinghouse, Presentation GLIMM-RPS-PM-L1-000008, Revision 0 ML22153A3602022-06-0909 June 2022 Constellation'S Presentation for June 9, 2022 Public Meeting About Limerick Generating Station Digital Modernization Project ML22187A0652022-06-0808 June 2022 Joint Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Nj/Ny Nuclear Power Plants - NRC Presentation Slides ML22103A2542022-04-19019 April 2022 Draft Request for Additional Information ML22076A1942022-03-23023 March 2022 Constellation Presentation March 23, 2022 NRC Di_C Workshop ML22080A1522022-03-21021 March 2022 Non-Proprietary Presentation for March 31, 2022 Pre-Submittal Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Regarding Planned Digital Modernization License Amendment Request for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 ML22010A0692022-01-10010 January 2022 Jan 11 2022 LGS Digital Modernization Pre-submittal Meeting Slides ML21335A0772021-12-0707 December 2021 Dec 07 2021 LGS Digital Modernization Pre-submittal Meeting Slides ML21294A3692021-11-15015 November 2021 Summary of October 6, 2021, Public Observation Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Proposed License Amendment Request to Modify Emergency Diesel Generator and Emregency Core Cooling System Surveillance Requirements ML21314A4472021-11-10010 November 2021 Slides for Presubmittial Meeting for Proposed Alternative to Adopt ASME Code Case N-921 to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval ML21278A5452021-10-20020 October 2021 Digital Modernization Project LAR Pre-submittal Meeting Presentation Slides October 20, 2021 ML21194A1582021-07-13013 July 2021 and Lasalle Nuclear Generating Stations 2020 Annual Assessment Meeting Slides ML21194A1822021-07-13013 July 2021 and Quad Cities Nuclear Generating Stations 2020 Annual Assessment Meeting Slides ML21174A0852021-06-23023 June 2021 Digital Modernization Project LAR Pre-submittal Meeting ML21165A1942021-06-16016 June 2021 Joint Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Nj/Ny Nuclear Power Plants - Webinar Presentation ML21165A2882021-06-16016 June 2021 Joint Annual Assessment for Pa/Md/Nj/Ny Nuclear Power Plants - Webinar Presentation (Updated) 2024-09-24
[Table view] Category:Slides and Viewgraphs
MONTHYEARML24267A0522024-09-24024 September 2024 Standby Gas Treatment Planned Amendment Preapplication Meeting Presentation ML24249A3092024-09-0606 September 2024 September 6, 2024, Public Meeting Related to Digital Instrumentation and Control Amendment Slides ML24232A2052024-08-12012 August 2024 Presentation Slides for Dresden End-of-Cycle Meeting ML24172A1092024-08-0707 August 2024 Scoping Power Point Presentation ML24200A2312024-07-22022 July 2024 Constellations Pre-Submittal Meeting Presentation About Peach Bottom ECCS Compensated Level System Replacement Project - July 22, 2024 ML24137A1882024-05-16016 May 2024 Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Ny/Nj Nuclear Power Plants - NRC Presentation Slides ML24134A2032024-05-14014 May 2024 Lessons Learned for ECCS Digital I&C License Amendment - Rev 0 ML24131A1282024-05-14014 May 2024 Lessons Learned for ECCS Digital I&C License Amendment ML24121A1862024-05-14014 May 2024 Attachment 3: Peach Bottom ECCS Compensated Level System Replacement Project Presentation Material (Non-Proprietary Information) ML24100A7672024-04-11011 April 2024 Meeting Slides - Preapplication with Constellation on Planned Fleet Alternative Request to Adopt OMN-2 ML24089A2612024-04-0909 April 2024 Slides - Constellation - Pre-Application Regarding Hooded Masks 4/9/2024 Meeting Slides (L-2024-LLM-0041) ML24029A1742024-01-30030 January 2024 Constellation Pre-Application January 30, 2024, Meeting Slides - Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-932, Alternative Requirements for Acceptance of Containment Base Metal Corrosion or Erosion ML23317A0712023-11-14014 November 2023 NRC Pre-Submittal Meeting on November 14th, 2023 - TSTF-591 and Selected 50.69 License Condition Updates (EPID L-2023-LLM-0098) (Slides) ML24051A0462023-10-31031 October 2023 UFSAR Revision 17, Chapter 6, Figure 6.3-35-6.4-1, Redacted (2) ML24051A0472023-10-31031 October 2023 UFSAR Revision 17, Chapter 6, Figure 6.3-4-6.3-34, Redacted (1) ML23251A0782023-09-0606 September 2023 DRE1 Decom Pre-Submittal Slides ML23255A1042023-08-11011 August 2023 Slides - Constellation - Pre-Application EP 9/18/2023 Draft CEG Presubmittal SG Performance Monitoring Plan Meeting Handout ML23221A2432023-08-10010 August 2023 Final Summer 2023 Confirmatory Survey Criteria ML23170A0082023-06-29029 June 2023 Decommissioning Presentation for NRC Pre-submittal Meeting, June 29, 2023 ML23173A0462023-06-28028 June 2023 DNPS SLR Pre-submittal Meeting Presentation Rev. 1 ML23173A0472023-06-28028 June 2023 SLRA - NRC Presubmittal Meeting Slides - 6-28-23 ML23145A1322023-06-27027 June 2023 June 27, 2023, Dresden Nuclear Power Station Subsequent License Renewal Environmental Pre-application Public Meeting - Constellation Slides ML23165A0242023-06-27027 June 2023 June 27, 2023, Dresden Nuclear Power Station Subsequent License Renewal Environmental Pre-application Public Meeting - NRC Slides ML23157A0352023-06-0606 June 2023 Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Ny/Nj Nuclear Power Plants - NRC Presentation Slides ML23094A1492023-04-11011 April 2023 Licensee Presentation on Whr Exemption Request for Public Meeting on April 11, 2023 ML23076A0442023-03-16016 March 2023 Pb U2 Scram Barrier Presentation KT Session ML23055A2712023-03-0202 March 2023 March 2, 2023, Preapplication Meeting to Discuss Planned Amendments to Adopt TSTF-505 and 10 CFR 50.69 (EPID L-2023-LRM-0007) - Slides ML23076A2822023-02-23023 February 2023 Licensee Presentation on Defense-in-Depth Process ML23076A2812023-02-23023 February 2023 Licensee Presentation on Pressure Boundary Process ML23053A1562023-02-23023 February 2023 NRC Presentation Slides for Public Meeting on February 23, 2023 - 10 CFR 50.69 Alternate Processes License Amendment Request Preliminary Partial Denial NEI 99-01, Slides - Constellation - Pre-Application EP 2/23/2023 Meeting Slides2023-02-21021 February 2023 Slides - Constellation - Pre-Application EP 2/23/2023 Meeting Slides ML23006A2572023-01-10010 January 2023 Digital Modernization Project Installation Support License Amendment Request and Exemption Request Presentation - January 10, 2023 (EPID L-2022-LRM-0099) (Slides) ML22347A1532022-12-13013 December 2022 Public Meeting Presentation, December 15, 2022 Di&C License Amendment Request ML22319A0012022-11-14014 November 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, Llc'S Presentation for November 10, 2022 Public Meeting with NRC ML22311A5112022-11-0707 November 2022 Pool Swell License - Amendment Request ML22250A4372022-09-0808 September 2022 NRC Staff'S Presentation for September 8, 2022 Partially Closed Public Meeting with Constellation - Review Planning and Tentative Review Timeline ML22249A0972022-09-0808 September 2022 Constellation'S Open Presentation for September 8, 2022 Partially Closed Public Meeting ML22249A2202022-09-0606 September 2022 Constellation'S Non-Proprietary Presentation for Limerick Generating Station Digital Modernization Project LAR Pre-submittal Meeting September 8, 2022 ML22195A2172022-07-12012 July 2022 D3 Audit Open Items List (Non-Proprietary) (07-12-22)_redacted ML22164A8082022-06-13013 June 2022 Westinghouse, Presentation GLIMM-RPS-PM-L1-000008, Revision 0 ML22153A3602022-06-0909 June 2022 Constellation'S Presentation for June 9, 2022 Public Meeting About Limerick Generating Station Digital Modernization Project ML22187A0652022-06-0808 June 2022 Joint Annual Assessment Meeting for Pa/Md/Nj/Ny Nuclear Power Plants - NRC Presentation Slides ML22076A1942022-03-23023 March 2022 Constellation Presentation March 23, 2022 NRC Di_C Workshop ML22080A1522022-03-21021 March 2022 Non-Proprietary Presentation for March 31, 2022 Pre-Submittal Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Regarding Planned Digital Modernization License Amendment Request for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 ML22053A2912022-02-22022 February 2022 NRC Slides for February 25, 2022 Meeting - Acceptance Review of Proposed Alternative to Adopt ASME Code Case N-921 at Dresden and Quad Cities ML22010A0692022-01-10010 January 2022 Jan 11 2022 LGS Digital Modernization Pre-submittal Meeting Slides ML21335A0772021-12-0707 December 2021 Dec 07 2021 LGS Digital Modernization Pre-submittal Meeting Slides ML21294A3692021-11-15015 November 2021 Summary of October 6, 2021, Public Observation Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Proposed License Amendment Request to Modify Emergency Diesel Generator and Emregency Core Cooling System Surveillance Requirements ML21314A4472021-11-10010 November 2021 Slides for Presubmittial Meeting for Proposed Alternative to Adopt ASME Code Case N-921 to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval ML21278A5452021-10-20020 October 2021 Digital Modernization Project LAR Pre-submittal Meeting Presentation Slides October 20, 2021 2024-09-06
[Table view] |
Text
2007 NRC Counterpart Meeting Status of the EP Threat Based Drill Project Scott McCain Midwest Corporate EP Manager Exelon Nuclear February 16th, 2007
Recap From 2006 Meeting Complete 4th tabletop at VY Feb-06.
Conduct drill at Callaway Mar-06.
Complete new NEI guidance document.
Submit to NRC and FEMA for endorsement.
Provide industry workshop at NEI EP Forum.
1
Current Status of the Project Phase I & II - Conducted tabletop and integrated drills to develop, refine and validate new onsite and offsite guidance and objectives.
- Tabletops held at Diablo Canyon (Air), Duane Arnold (Land), North Anna (Air, Land and Water), Vermont Yankee (Land).
- Integrated drill was held at Callaway (Land).
- 16 utilities representing 51 sites (77% of NPPs) and 12 States (39%
of the states with NPPs) participated in developing the guidance.
Phase III - 3 year period for industry threat drills (09/2006).
- Industry requested NRC/FEMA endorsement of guidance.
- NRC and FEMA currently part of joint scenario working group.
Phase IV - Incorporation of threat drills into the evaluated exercise program [End State].
2
2007 2008 2009 Turkey Point (Feb) Beaver Valley (Jan)
Byron (02/21/08) St. Lucie (Feb) 1Q Palo Verde (03/05/08) Farley (Mar)
Palisades (03/08/08)
Quad Cites (04/04/07) Limerick (04/12/08) Crystal River (1-2Q)
Vogtle (05/23/07) McGuire (May) Millstone (2Q)
Seabrook (06/19/07) San Onofre (May) LaSalle (04/29/09) 2Q Browns Ferry (05/14/08) Peach Bottom (May)
Dresden (06/18/08) South Texas (05/19/09)
Salem / Hope Cr (05/18/09)
Catawba (06/23/09)
Braidwood (07/11/07) D.C. Cook (3Q) Comanche Peak (8/20/08) Oconee (Jul-09)
Brunswick (07/17/07) Fort Calhoun (3Q) Shearon-Harris (Sep) Sequoyah (08/17/09)
Prairie Island (07/24/07) Ginna (3Q) Summer (Sep) 3Q Fermi (08/20/07) Hatch (3Q) Oyster Creek (Sep)
Point Beach (08/29/07) Robinson (Aug) Kewaunee (09/09/08)
Perry (09/12/07)
Columbia (10/23/07) Fitz / Nine Mi Pt (Fall) Watts Bar (11/05/08) Arkansas Nuclear (Fall)
Susquehanna (11/13/07) Pilgrim (Fall) Davis-Besse (11/13/08) River Bend (Fall)
Grand Gulf (4Q) Waterford (Dec) Clinton (10/14/09) 4Q Wolf Creek (4Q) Surry (12/02/08) Cooper (TBD)
Three Mile Island (Oct) Monticello (12/03/08)
Calvert Cliffs (10/20/08) 3
Scenario Development Workshop Hosted by Region III RUG at Exelon Chicago headquarters on February 13.
Agenda focus was for utility and offsite scenario developers.
- Project history
- Detailed scenario development and conduct session
- Lessons Learned process
- Offsite agency coordination and funding 82 utility, state and local planners attended.
4
Jan-06 Industry Concerns Prompt review and endorsement by NRC and FEMA.
This includes relaxing the requirement of an offsite radiological release for exercises.
Defining the scope of an EP Security exercise such that it is considered a meaningful event to allow participation credit [successfully dispositioned].
Scope limitations to ERO actions. Onsite and offsite security forces are specifically tested and evaluated under different venues (such as FoF).
Single licensee inspection evaluation. Part 1 objectives fall under the exercise or FoF evals
[successfully dispositioned].
5
Today's Industry Concerns Still looking for prompt review and endorsement by NRC and FEMA. This includes consideration to vary the requirement for an offsite radiological release in exercises.
FEMA participation has primarily been as observers in the pilot drills.
No solid understanding of the federal response plans and processes by utility and state.
Scope creep of the extent of play (security force activities, site actions through an attack, rad hazards) 6
NEI 06-04 Scenario Anatomy Event Threat Met Personnel Injury and Site Initiation and Secured Damage Response A B C A: Starts with normal plant operations and proceeds up to the point that a threat event occurs (Part 1).
B: Starts with the event (plane crashes, bomb explodes, attack force crosses boundary) and ends when the onsite threat has been cleared (FoF Exercises).
C: Starts with ERO staged and/or response facilities activated and ends with the completion of the drill objectives (Part 2).
7
Drill Design - Scope/Objectives Initial Event Response (Part 1) Post Event Response (Part 2)
Scope Scope Integrated EP and Offsite initial response Large-scale post event response based on to a threat-related event. significant damage caused by a threat-related event.
Main Objectives Main Objectives
- 1. Classification/Notification 1. Mitigation
- 2. Onsite protective actions 2. Unified command / communications
- 3. Augmentation logistics 3. Release/Protective measure
- 4. Initial operator plant control actions considerations
- 5. ERO response logistics 4. Public Information
- 6. Offsite initial response/resources 5. Remote / alternate ERFs
- 7. Security LLEA interface 6. Multi-casualty medical response
- 7. Large-scale/area fire
- 8. 50.54(x) activities (SAM, security)
- 9. INS considerations
- 10. Crime scene considerations 8
Drill Design - Main Differences Coordination and participation of the State and local agencies is far beyond the scope of any current routine exercise - EMA REP is only a portion of this event.
While the main focus of the Phase III threat scenario is not on a radiological release nor offsite protective actions, conditions would still involve the thought and decision processes and procedures for these activities.
9
Threat Objectives Bases Tiered hierarchy based on §50.47(b)
Planning Standards plus mitigation.
Objectives are organized within the categories of the planning standards.
PS
- FEMA EEM, NUREG-0654 and IP 82302 RSPS used as templates Demonstration Criteria, the specific performance evaluation elements, were Overall Objectives derived from many sources.
- RIS 04-15, EP Lessons - Post 9/11 Facility Objectives
- 71114.07, FoF IP
- ICM Order, B.5.b section Demonstration Criteria
- Several 2005 Advisories
- Pilot tabletops and drill 10
Lessons Learned NOTE: NEI is maintaining a website for collecting and communicating Phase III onsite and offsite lessons Learned.
There is significantly more scenario development effort involved in creating the threat drills.
- Development team members are needed from each offsite agency.
- Outreach and inclusion of State agencies outside REP/EM are necessary (Terrorism or Homeland Security divisions).
A key player tabletop or similar venue prior the full ERF threat drill (to identify communications issues, vague procedure instructions and inapplicable action steps) is highly recommended.
Integration of Unified Area Command center is not well defined.
Utility employees are not familiar/proficient with onsite protective actions and communications during threat scenarios.
11
Lessons Learned Training and drills for response to, staffing of and operations from backup ERFs need to be more formally conducted to establish a minimum level of proficiency in this area.
Sites with nearby EOF and JIC facilities could have ERO mobilization issues depending on the time of day a given threat scenario takes place.
Utility employees are not familiar/proficient with onsite protective actions and communications during threat scenarios.
Time jump considerations for take cover and restored movement within the site have not been thoroughly considered in several of the personnel attack scenarios.
12
Discussion 13