ML18149A601: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 5/29/18 9:14 AMReceived: May 25, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93cn-slg9Comments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0022Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Cord BauerGeneral CommentThe Navy has protocols for the movement of nuclear waste. The Navy has a storage site for nuclear waste. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this nonsense. End the SONGS lease and have the Navy take over the power plant. Have the Navy move the nuclear waste to their storage site, and charge SDG&E for the trouble.Otherwise, you're playing roulette with a potential environmental, economic and security risk that will affect the lives of eight million people within 50 miles of SONGS, the nation and the world. C'mon guys, quit with the bureaucratic bullshit.Page 1 of 105/29/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064832f6330&format=xml&showorig=false PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 5/29/18 9:14 AMReceived: May 25, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93cn-slg9Comments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0022Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Cord BauerGeneral CommentThe Navy has protocols for the movement of nuclear waste. The Navy has a storage site for nuclear waste. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this nonsense. End the SONGS lease and have the Navy take over the power plant. Have the Navy move the nuclear waste to their storage site, and charge SDG&E for the trouble.Otherwise, you're playing roulette with a potential environmental, economic and security risk that will affect the lives of eight million people within 50 miles of SONGS, the nation and the world. C'mon guys, quit with the bureaucratic bullshit.Page 1 of 105/29/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064832f6330&format=xml&showorig=false}}
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 5/29/18 9:14 AM Received:
May 25, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93cn-slg9 Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
 
Submission Type:
WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0022 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Cord Bauer General CommentThe Navy has protocols for the movement of nuclear waste. The Navy ha s a storage site for nuclear waste. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this nonsense. End the SONGS lease and have the Navy take over the power plant. Have the Navy move the nuclear waste to their storage site, and charge SDG&E for the trouble.
Otherwise, you're playing roule tte with a potential environmenta l, economic and security risk that will affect the lives of ei ght million people within 50 miles of SONGS, the nation and the world. C'mon guys, quit with the bureaucratic bullshit.Page 1 of 105/29/2018https://www.fdms.gov/
fdms/getcontent?object Id=09000064832f6330&format
=xml&showorig=false PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 5/29/18 9:14 AM Received:
May 25, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93cn-slg9 Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
 
Submission Type:
WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0022 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Cord Bauer General CommentThe Navy has protocols for the movement of nuclear waste. The Navy ha s a storage site for nuclear waste. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this nonsense. End the SONGS lease and have the Navy take over the power plant. Have the Navy move the nuclear waste to their storage site, and charge SDG&E for the trouble.
Otherwise, you're playing roule tte with a potential environmenta l, economic and security risk that will affect the lives of ei ght million people within 50 miles of SONGS, the nation and the world. C'mon guys, quit with the bureaucratic bullshit.Page 1 of 105/29/2018https://www.fdms.gov/
fdms/getcontent?object Id=09000064832f6330&format
=xml&showorig=false}}

Revision as of 22:13, 28 June 2018

Comment (019) from Cord Bauer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18149A601
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/25/2018
From: Bauer C
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY/RAS
References
83FR12504 00019, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8
Download: ML18149A601 (1)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 5/29/18 9:14 AM Received: May 25, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93cn-slg9 Comments Due: June 05, 2018

Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0022 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Cord Bauer General CommentThe Navy has protocols for the movement of nuclear waste. The Navy ha s a storage site for nuclear waste. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this nonsense. End the SONGS lease and have the Navy take over the power plant. Have the Navy move the nuclear waste to their storage site, and charge SDG&E for the trouble. Otherwise, you're playing roule tte with a potential environmenta l, economic and security risk that will affect the lives of ei ght million people within 50 miles of SONGS, the nation and the world. C'mon guys, quit with the bureaucratic bullshit.Page 1 of 105/29/2018https://www.fdms.gov/ fdms/getcontent?object Id=09000064832f6330&format =xml&showorig=false PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 5/29/18 9:14 AM Received: May 25, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93cn-slg9 Comments Due: June 05, 2018

Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0022 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Cord Bauer General CommentThe Navy has protocols for the movement of nuclear waste. The Navy ha s a storage site for nuclear waste. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this nonsense. End the SONGS lease and have the Navy take over the power plant. Have the Navy move the nuclear waste to their storage site, and charge SDG&E for the trouble. Otherwise, you're playing roule tte with a potential environmenta l, economic and security risk that will affect the lives of ei ght million people within 50 miles of SONGS, the nation and the world. C'mon guys, quit with the bureaucratic bullshit.Page 1 of 105/29/2018https://www.fdms.gov/ fdms/getcontent?object Id=09000064832f6330&format =xml&showorig=false}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18149A601&oldid=727983"