ML18157A378: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 6/5/18 12:53 PMReceived: June 05, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93jq-txr5Comments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Carmela PriceAddress: 2401 Mariposa WestUnit 1E Laguna Woods, CA,  92637Email: etausk@comline.comGeneral CommentI support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A container wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of people in this area.Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false}}
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:53 PM Received:
June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1k2-93jq-txr5 Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
 
Submission Type:
WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Carmela Price Address:
2401 Mariposa West Unit 1E Laguna Woods, CA,  92637 Email: etausk@comline.com General CommentI support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A c ontainer wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of pe ople in this area.Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/
fdms/getcontent?object Id=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false}}

Revision as of 23:03, 28 June 2018

Comment (052) from Carmela Price on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A378
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/05/2018
From: Price C
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY/RAS
References
82FR12504 00052, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8
Download: ML18157A378 (1)


Text

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:53 PM Received:

June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1k2-93jq-txr5 Comments Due:

June 05, 2018

Submission Type:

WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:

NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:

NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Carmela Price Address:

2401 Mariposa West Unit 1E Laguna Woods, CA, 92637 Email: etausk@comline.com General CommentI support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A c ontainer wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of pe ople in this area.Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/

fdms/getcontent?object Id=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false