ML18157A379: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 6/5/18 12:55 PMReceived: June 05, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93jq-gsegComments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0056Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Doris PfalmerAddress: Oceanside,  CA,  92054Email: dopfapfo@gmail.comGeneral CommentPLEASE use the HELMS method of storing this hideous amount of nuclear waste! It is safer than the ridiculous plan Southern California Edison has in place now, which has us facing disaster with massive nuclear waste stored in 5/8 inch thick canisters! If the US is going to allow this crap to be used, they need to store it in the safest way possible!Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648333ef50&format=xml&showorig=false}}
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:55 PM Received:
June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1k2-93jq-gseg Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
 
Submission Type:
WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0056 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Doris Pfalmer Address:
Oceanside,  CA,  92054 Email: dopfapfo@gmail.com General CommentPLEASE use the HELMS method of storing this hideous amount of nuclear waste! It is safer than the ridiculous plan Southern California Edison has in place now, which has us facing disaster with massive nuclear waste stored in 5/8 inch thick cani sters! If the US is going to allow this crap to be used, they need to store it in the safest way possible!Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fd ms/getcontent?object Id=090000648333ef50&format=xml&showorig=false}}

Revision as of 22:03, 28 June 2018

Comment (053) from Doris Pfalmer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A379
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/05/2018
From: Pfalmer D
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY/RAS
References
83FR12504 00053, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8
Download: ML18157A379 (1)
v • d • e


Text

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:55 PM Received:

June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1k2-93jq-gseg Comments Due:

June 05, 2018

Submission Type:

WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:

NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:

NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0056 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Doris Pfalmer Address:

Oceanside, CA, 92054 Email: dopfapfo@gmail.com General CommentPLEASE use the HELMS method of storing this hideous amount of nuclear waste! It is safer than the ridiculous plan Southern California Edison has in place now, which has us facing disaster with massive nuclear waste stored in 5/8 inch thick cani sters! If the US is going to allow this crap to be used, they need to store it in the safest way possible!Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fd ms/getcontent?object Id=090000648333ef50&format=xml&showorig=false

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18157A379&oldid=727835"