ML18157A379: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 6/5/18 12:55 PMReceived: June 05, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93jq-gsegComments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0056Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Doris PfalmerAddress: Oceanside,  CA,  92054Email: dopfapfo@gmail.comGeneral CommentPLEASE use the HELMS method of storing this hideous amount of nuclear waste! It is safer than the ridiculous plan Southern California Edison has in place now, which has us facing disaster with massive nuclear waste stored in 5/8 inch thick canisters! If the US is going to allow this crap to be used, they need to store it in the safest way possible!Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648333ef50&format=xml&showorig=false}}

Revision as of 18:22, 19 June 2018

Comment (053) from Doris Pfalmer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A379
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/05/2018
From: Pfalmer D
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY/RAS
References
83FR12504 00053, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8
Download: ML18157A379 (1)


Text

PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 6/5/18 12:55 PMReceived: June 05, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93jq-gsegComments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0056Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Doris PfalmerAddress: Oceanside, CA, 92054Email: dopfapfo@gmail.comGeneral CommentPLEASE use the HELMS method of storing this hideous amount of nuclear waste! It is safer than the ridiculous plan Southern California Edison has in place now, which has us facing disaster with massive nuclear waste stored in 5/8 inch thick canisters! If the US is going to allow this crap to be used, they need to store it in the safest way possible!Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648333ef50&format=xml&showorig=false