ML20096G678: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:57058, TAC:57059
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:'
g,
,.~
MSCORSin Electnc me coune 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 September 4, 1984 Mr. H. R. De'          n ton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention:            Mr. J. R. Miller, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 3 Gentlemen:
DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 NUREG-0737, ITEM II.B.3 CORE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 In Mr. J. R. Miller's letter of November 3, 1983, which transmitted the Safety Evaluation for the Post-Accident Sampling
  ~
System at our Point Beach. Nuclear Plant, we were requested to provide a plant-specific procedure which implements the Westinghouse Owners' Group (WOG) Post-Accident Core Damage Assessment Methodology.
Pleasel find-attached Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure (EPIP) 1.7, " Core Damage Estimation Procedure". EPIP 1.7 will be used to implement the WOG methodology. This fulfills the final require-ments for this item as. stated in the November 3 Safety Evaluation.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours, Vice-Presid nt-Nuclear Power C . -. W. Fay Attachment Copy to.NRC Resident Inspector 8409110094 840904 PDR ADOCK 05000266                                                d(p F                          PDR                                        E l
                                                                                      >}}

Latest revision as of 12:21, 24 September 2022

Forwards Rev 4 to Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure EPIP 1.7, Core Damage Estimation Procedure, in Response to Jr Miller 831103 Request.Submittal Fulfills Final Requirements in 831103 SER Re post-accident Sampling Sys
ML20096G678
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/04/1984
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton, John Miller
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20096G681 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, TASK-2.B.3, TASK-TM TAC-57058, TAC-57059, NUDOCS 8409110094
Download: ML20096G678 (1)


Text

'

g,

,.~

MSCORSin Electnc me coune 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 September 4, 1984 Mr. H. R. De' n ton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. J. R. Miller, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 3 Gentlemen:

DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 NUREG-0737, ITEM II.B.3 CORE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 In Mr. J. R. Miller's letter of November 3, 1983, which transmitted the Safety Evaluation for the Post-Accident Sampling

~

System at our Point Beach. Nuclear Plant, we were requested to provide a plant-specific procedure which implements the Westinghouse Owners' Group (WOG) Post-Accident Core Damage Assessment Methodology.

Pleasel find-attached Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure (EPIP) 1.7, " Core Damage Estimation Procedure". EPIP 1.7 will be used to implement the WOG methodology. This fulfills the final require-ments for this item as. stated in the November 3 Safety Evaluation.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, Vice-Presid nt-Nuclear Power C . -. W. Fay Attachment Copy to.NRC Resident Inspector 8409110094 840904 PDR ADOCK 05000266 d(p F PDR E l

>