ML20137H697: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:/        o
            *g                            UNITED STATES
  !*            g              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D            E                      WASHINGTON D. C. 20555
  \.....)
4 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATING TO AMENDMENT NO. 94 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-40 OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285
 
== Introduction:==
 
By letter dated July 11, 1985, the Omaha Public Power District (the licensee) requested a change to the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 (FCS-1) reactor vessel materials surveillance capsule withdrawal schedule, which is contained in Table 3-7 of the FCS-1 Technical Specifications. The licensee's surveillance program must comply with requirements of Appendix H.10 CFR Part 50.
By letter dated July 11, 1985, the licensee also requested other changes to the Technical Specifications. The other changes were addressed in our Amendment No. 93 which was issued on December 6, 1985.
The following safety evaluation completes our work on the licensee's July 11, 1985 application for amendment.
Evaluation:
According to Section !!.B.1 of Appendix H, 10 CFR Part 50, the proposed withdrawal schedule must meet the requirements of ASTM E 185-82. The intent of these requirements is to provide material surveillance data throughout the life of the vessel. As a result of new core loading designs, the anticipated end-of-life (E0L)peakneutronflyence(E>1MeV)attheinsidesurfaceofthe r
FCS-1 reactor vessel is 3.3 x 10 n/cm . The removal sequence proposed by the licensee will provide for withdrawal of seven surveillance capsules, in whichtherangeofn{ytronirradiationtobereceivedbythecapsuleswillbe from 1.6 to 3.6 x 10 n/cm . This range of irradiation should be sufficient r
to characterize the effect of neutron irradiation on the FCS-1 reactor vessel throughout its design life, since it exceeds the EOL peak neutron fluence at the FCS-1 reactor vessel inside surface. Hence, the proposed capsule withdrawal schedule meets the requirements of Appendix H.10 CFR Part 50 and may be incorporated into the FCS-1 Technical Specifications, n601210613 060110 DR    ADOCK 000      5
 
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant in"rease in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Comission has previously published a proposed finding that the amenoment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public coment on such finding. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for catecarical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR $51.22(c)(?).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 651.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the arendment.
CONCLUSION Wehaveconcluded,basedontheconsiderationsdiscusseeabove,thet(1)there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activitics will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date: January 10, 1986 Principal Contributor:
B. Elliot
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __}}

Revision as of 22:34, 30 June 2020

Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 94 to License DPR-40
ML20137H697
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 01/10/1986
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20137H655 List:
References
TAC-59219, NUDOCS 8601210613
Download: ML20137H697 (2)


Text

/ o

  • g UNITED STATES

!* g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D E WASHINGTON D. C. 20555

\.....)

4 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATING TO AMENDMENT NO. 94 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-40 OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285

Introduction:

By letter dated July 11, 1985, the Omaha Public Power District (the licensee) requested a change to the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 (FCS-1) reactor vessel materials surveillance capsule withdrawal schedule, which is contained in Table 3-7 of the FCS-1 Technical Specifications. The licensee's surveillance program must comply with requirements of Appendix H.10 CFR Part 50.

By letter dated July 11, 1985, the licensee also requested other changes to the Technical Specifications. The other changes were addressed in our Amendment No. 93 which was issued on December 6, 1985.

The following safety evaluation completes our work on the licensee's July 11, 1985 application for amendment.

Evaluation:

According to Section !!.B.1 of Appendix H, 10 CFR Part 50, the proposed withdrawal schedule must meet the requirements of ASTM E 185-82. The intent of these requirements is to provide material surveillance data throughout the life of the vessel. As a result of new core loading designs, the anticipated end-of-life (E0L)peakneutronflyence(E>1MeV)attheinsidesurfaceofthe r

FCS-1 reactor vessel is 3.3 x 10 n/cm . The removal sequence proposed by the licensee will provide for withdrawal of seven surveillance capsules, in whichtherangeofn{ytronirradiationtobereceivedbythecapsuleswillbe from 1.6 to 3.6 x 10 n/cm . This range of irradiation should be sufficient r

to characterize the effect of neutron irradiation on the FCS-1 reactor vessel throughout its design life, since it exceeds the EOL peak neutron fluence at the FCS-1 reactor vessel inside surface. Hence, the proposed capsule withdrawal schedule meets the requirements of Appendix H.10 CFR Part 50 and may be incorporated into the FCS-1 Technical Specifications, n601210613 060110 DR ADOCK 000 5

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.

The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant in"rease in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Comission has previously published a proposed finding that the amenoment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public coment on such finding. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for catecarical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR $51.22(c)(?).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 651.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the arendment.

CONCLUSION Wehaveconcluded,basedontheconsiderationsdiscusseeabove,thet(1)there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activitics will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

Date: January 10, 1986 Principal Contributor:

B. Elliot

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __