ML13253A006: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML13253A006
| number = ML13253A006
| issue date = 09/26/2013
| issue date = 09/26/2013
| title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, 3/18/13 Affidavit Executed by J. Gresham, Westinghouse Regarding WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0 (TAC Nos. MF1365 and MF1366)
| title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, 3/18/13 Affidavit Executed by J. Gresham, Westinghouse Regarding WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0
| author name = Singal B K
| author name = Singal B
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Flores R
| addressee name = Flores R
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000445, 05000446
| docket = 05000445, 05000446
| license number = NPF-087, NPF-089
| license number = NPF-087, NPF-089
| contact person = Singal B K
| contact person = Singal B
| case reference number = TAC MF1365, TAC MF1366
| case reference number = TAC MF1365, TAC MF1366
| document type = Letter, Proprietary Information Review
| document type = Letter, Proprietary Information Review
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 26, 2013 Mr. Rafael Flores Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Attention:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 26, 2013 Mr. Rafael Flores Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Attention: Regulatory Affairs Luminant Generation Company LLC P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043
Regulatory Affairs Luminant Generation Company LLC P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043 REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (TAC NOS. MF1365 AND MF1366)  
 
==SUBJECT:==
REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (TAC NOS. MF1365 AND MF1366)


==Dear Mr. Flores:==
==Dear Mr. Flores:==
By letter dated March 28, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 13095A023), you submitted an affidavit to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated March 18,2013, executed by Mr. James A. Gresham, Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse), requesting that the information contained in the following document (designated as Enclosure 2 to the letter dated March 28, 2013) be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:
 
Revision 0, "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis," March 2013 (Proprietary)
By letter dated March 28, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13095A023), you submitted an affidavit to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated March 18,2013, executed by Mr. James A. Gresham, Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse), requesting that the information contained in the following document (designated as Enclosure 2 to the letter dated March 28, 2013) be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:
The document was submitted in support of license amendment request 13-01 for revision to the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP), Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications (TSs) 3.7.16, "Fuel Storage Pool Boron Concentration," 3.6.17, "Spent Fuel Assembly Storage," 4.3, "Fuel Storage," and 5.5, "Programs and Manuals." A non-proprietary version of the document, designated as Enclosure 3 to the letter dated March 28, 2013, was also submitted and is available in ADAMS Accession No. ML 13095A024.
WCAP~17728-P,        Revision 0, "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis," March 2013 (Proprietary)
In the affidavit dated March 18, 2013, Mr. Gresham stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from the mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or a component structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. Its use by competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
The document was submitted in support of license amendment request 13-01 for revision to the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP), Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications (TSs) 3.7.16, "Fuel Storage Pool Boron Concentration," 3.6.17, "Spent Fuel Assembly Storage,"
R. -The NRC staff has reviewed your application and all of the supporting information in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and have concluded that you have not provided sufficient justification for us to determine that (1) the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure contains proprietary information providing Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitor and (2) its use by the competitors would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing its expenditure of resources.
4.3, "Fuel Storage," and 5.5, "Programs and Manuals." A non-proprietary version of the document, designated as Enclosure 3 to the letter dated March 28, 2013, was also submitted and is available in ADAMS Accession No. ML13095A024.
The regulations in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4) state that while making a determination whether the information is considered proprietary or not, the Commission will consider the following: Whether the information has been held in confidence by its owner; Whether the information is of a type customarily held in confidence by its owner, and except for voluntarily submitted information, whether there is a rational basis therefor; Whether the information was transmitted to and received by Commission in Whether the information is available in public sources and; Whether public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the owner of the information, taking into account the value of the information to the owner; the amount of effort or money, if any, expended by the owner in developing the information; and the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others. The NRC staff has reviewed the information claimed as proprietary and determined that the methodology used for performing CPNPP, Units 1 and 2, Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis and SCALE Version 5.1 Code Validation is based on publicly available documents such as NUREG/CR-6698, "Guide for Validation of Nuclear Criticality Safety Calculational Methodology," January 2001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML050250061), and NUREG/CR-6979, "Evaluation of the French Haut Taux de Combustion (HTC) Critical Experiment Data," September 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML082880452).
In the affidavit dated March 18, 2013, Mr. Gresham stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from the mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
Some of the other information claimed as proprietary is publicly available in the licensing basis documents for CPNPP, Units 1 and 2. Hence, the NRC staff has concluded that it does not meet the threshold for 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4)(iv).
(a)      The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or a component structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
Also, the NRC staff has concluded that the use of the information from publicly available documents, such as NUREG/CR-6698 and NUREG/CR-6979, is not likely to cause SUbstantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse, if a similar methodology is developed by the Westinghouse competitor.
(c)      Its use by competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
Westinghouse did not spend any resources to develop these documents.
 
The NRC staff concludes that a competitor can reasonably develop a similar methodology without much difficulty by use of the information claimed as proprietary from publicly available documents.
R. Flores                                          - 2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and all of the supporting information in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and have concluded that you have not provided sufficient justification for us to determine that (1) the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure contains proprietary information providing Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitor and (2) its use by the competitors would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing its expenditure of resources.
Hence, the Westinghouse claim does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4)(v).
The regulations in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4) state that while making a determination whether the information is considered proprietary or not, the Commission will consider the following:
R. -Accordingly, the NRC staff has concluded that the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390. Therefore, your request to withhold WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0, March 2013, from public disclosure is denied. Within 30 days from the receipt of this letter, the subject documents will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, you request withdrawal of the documents in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(c), your request will be considered in light of applicable statutes and regulations and a determination made whether the documents will be withheld from public disclosure and returned to you. If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov. Sincerely, 0-( Q ... --\ t.g, Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Enclosure J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv R. Accordingly, the NRC staff has concluded that the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390. Therefore, your request to withhold WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0, March 2013, from public disclosure is denied. Within 30 days from the receipt of this letter, the subject documents will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, you request withdrawal of the documents in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(c), your request will be considered in light of applicable statutes and regulations and a determination made whether the documents will be withheld from public disclosure and returned to you. If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov. Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Enclosure J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv Branch Reading RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource ADAMS Accession No. ML 13253A006 NRRlDORLlLPL4/PM NAME BSingal DATE 9/24/13 OFFICE OGC
(i)      Whether the information has been held in confidence by its owner; (ii)      Whether the information is of a type customarily held in confidence by its owner, and except for voluntarily submitted information, whether there is a rational basis therefor; (iii)    Whether the information was transmitted to and received by the Commission in confidence; (iv)      Whether the information is available in public sources and; (v)      Whether public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the owner of the information, taking into account the value of the information to the owner; the amount of effort or money, if any, expended by the owner in developing the information; and the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others.
* NAME Charles Mullin 9/23/13 Sincerely, IRA! Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource RidsNrrPMComanchePeak Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource KWood, NRRlDSS/SRXB NRRlDORLlLPL4/LA SS/SRXB/BC JBurkhardt 9/10/13 NRRlDORLlLPL4/PM 9/24/13 OFFICIAL AGENCY}}
The NRC staff has reviewed the information claimed as proprietary and determined that the methodology used for performing CPNPP, Units 1 and 2, Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis and SCALE Version 5.1 Code Validation is based on publicly available documents such as NUREG/CR-6698, "Guide for Validation of Nuclear Criticality Safety Calculational Methodology," January 2001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML050250061), and NUREG/CR-6979, "Evaluation of the French Haut Taux de Combustion (HTC) Critical Experiment Data," September 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML082880452). Some of the other information claimed as proprietary is publicly available in the licensing basis documents for CPNPP, Units 1 and 2. Hence, the NRC staff has concluded that it does not meet the threshold for 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4)(iv).
Also, the NRC staff has concluded that the use of the information from publicly available documents, such as NUREG/CR-6698 and NUREG/CR-6979, is not likely to cause SUbstantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse, if a similar methodology is developed by the Westinghouse competitor. Westinghouse did not spend any resources to develop these documents. The NRC staff concludes that a competitor can reasonably develop a similar methodology without much difficulty by use of the information claimed as proprietary from publicly available documents. Hence, the Westinghouse claim does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4)(v).
 
R. Flores                                        - 3 Accordingly, the NRC staff has concluded that the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390. Therefore, your request to withhold WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0, March 2013, from public disclosure is denied.
Within 30 days from the receipt of this letter, the subject documents will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, you request withdrawal of the documents in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(c), your request will be considered in light of applicable statutes and regulations and a determination made whether the documents will be withheld from public disclosure and returned to you.
If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, D    0-( Q ... --\ t.g, IA..,-~
Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Enclosure cc:  J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv
 
R. Flores                                        -3 Accordingly, the NRC staff has concluded that the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390. Therefore, your request to withhold WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0, March 2013, from public disclosure is denied.
Within 30 days from the receipt of this letter, the subject documents will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, you request withdrawal of the documents in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(c), your request will be considered in light of applicable statutes and regulations and a determination made whether the documents will be withheld from public disclosure and returned to you.
If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, IRA!
Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Enclosure cc:  J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource Branch Reading                                       RidsNrrPMComanchePeak Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource                        RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource                             KWood, NRRlDSS/SRXB RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource ADAMS Accession No. ML13253A006 NRRlDORLlLPL4/PM           NRRlDORLlLPL4/LA                    SS/SRXB/BC NAME           BSingal                     JBurkhardt DATE           9/24/13                    9/10/13 OFFICE         OGC                                                       NRRlDORLlLPL4/PM
* NAME           Charles Mullin 9/23/13                     9/24/13 OFFICIAL AGENCY RECORD}}

Latest revision as of 03:51, 20 March 2020

Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, 3/18/13 Affidavit Executed by J. Gresham, Westinghouse Regarding WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0
ML13253A006
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/2013
From: Balwant Singal
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Flores R
Luminant Generation Co
Singal B
References
TAC MF1365, TAC MF1366
Download: ML13253A006 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 26, 2013 Mr. Rafael Flores Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Attention: Regulatory Affairs Luminant Generation Company LLC P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (TAC NOS. MF1365 AND MF1366)

Dear Mr. Flores:

By letter dated March 28, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13095A023), you submitted an affidavit to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated March 18,2013, executed by Mr. James A. Gresham, Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse), requesting that the information contained in the following document (designated as Enclosure 2 to the letter dated March 28, 2013) be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:

WCAP~17728-P, Revision 0, "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis," March 2013 (Proprietary)

The document was submitted in support of license amendment request 13-01 for revision to the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP), Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications (TSs) 3.7.16, "Fuel Storage Pool Boron Concentration," 3.6.17, "Spent Fuel Assembly Storage,"

4.3, "Fuel Storage," and 5.5, "Programs and Manuals." A non-proprietary version of the document, designated as Enclosure 3 to the letter dated March 28, 2013, was also submitted and is available in ADAMS Accession No. ML13095A024.

In the affidavit dated March 18, 2013, Mr. Gresham stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from the mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:

(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or a component structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.

(c) Its use by competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

R. Flores - 2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and all of the supporting information in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and have concluded that you have not provided sufficient justification for us to determine that (1) the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure contains proprietary information providing Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitor and (2) its use by the competitors would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing its expenditure of resources.

The regulations in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4) state that while making a determination whether the information is considered proprietary or not, the Commission will consider the following:

(i) Whether the information has been held in confidence by its owner; (ii) Whether the information is of a type customarily held in confidence by its owner, and except for voluntarily submitted information, whether there is a rational basis therefor; (iii) Whether the information was transmitted to and received by the Commission in confidence; (iv) Whether the information is available in public sources and; (v) Whether public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the owner of the information, taking into account the value of the information to the owner; the amount of effort or money, if any, expended by the owner in developing the information; and the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others.

The NRC staff has reviewed the information claimed as proprietary and determined that the methodology used for performing CPNPP, Units 1 and 2, Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis and SCALE Version 5.1 Code Validation is based on publicly available documents such as NUREG/CR-6698, "Guide for Validation of Nuclear Criticality Safety Calculational Methodology," January 2001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML050250061), and NUREG/CR-6979, "Evaluation of the French Haut Taux de Combustion (HTC) Critical Experiment Data," September 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML082880452). Some of the other information claimed as proprietary is publicly available in the licensing basis documents for CPNPP, Units 1 and 2. Hence, the NRC staff has concluded that it does not meet the threshold for 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4)(iv).

Also, the NRC staff has concluded that the use of the information from publicly available documents, such as NUREG/CR-6698 and NUREG/CR-6979, is not likely to cause SUbstantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse, if a similar methodology is developed by the Westinghouse competitor. Westinghouse did not spend any resources to develop these documents. The NRC staff concludes that a competitor can reasonably develop a similar methodology without much difficulty by use of the information claimed as proprietary from publicly available documents. Hence, the Westinghouse claim does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4)(v).

R. Flores - 3 Accordingly, the NRC staff has concluded that the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390. Therefore, your request to withhold WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0, March 2013, from public disclosure is denied.

Within 30 days from the receipt of this letter, the subject documents will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, you request withdrawal of the documents in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(c), your request will be considered in light of applicable statutes and regulations and a determination made whether the documents will be withheld from public disclosure and returned to you.

If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, D 0-( Q ... --\ t.g, IA..,-~

Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Enclosure cc: J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv

R. Flores -3 Accordingly, the NRC staff has concluded that the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390. Therefore, your request to withhold WCAP-17728-P, Revision 0, March 2013, from public disclosure is denied.

Within 30 days from the receipt of this letter, the subject documents will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, you request withdrawal of the documents in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(c), your request will be considered in light of applicable statutes and regulations and a determination made whether the documents will be withheld from public disclosure and returned to you.

If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, IRA!

Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Enclosure cc: J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource Branch Reading RidsNrrPMComanchePeak Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource KWood, NRRlDSS/SRXB RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource ADAMS Accession No. ML13253A006 NRRlDORLlLPL4/PM NRRlDORLlLPL4/LA SS/SRXB/BC NAME BSingal JBurkhardt DATE 9/24/13 9/10/13 OFFICE OGC NRRlDORLlLPL4/PM

  • NAME Charles Mullin 9/23/13 9/24/13 OFFICIAL AGENCY RECORD