ML072960179: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML072960179
| number = ML072960179
| issue date = 10/29/2007
| issue date = 10/29/2007
| title = Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 - Request for Additional Information, Stretch Power Uprate Amendment Request (TAC MD6070)
| title = Request for Additional Information, Stretch Power Uprate Amendment Request
| author name = Lamb J G
| author name = Lamb J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLI-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLI-2
| addressee name = Christian D A
| addressee name = Christian D
| addressee affiliation = Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc, Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
| addressee affiliation = Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc, Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
| docket = 05000423
| docket = 05000423
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:October 29, 2007
{{#Wiki_filter:October 29, 2007 Mr. David A. Christian President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711
 
Mr. David A. Christian President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING STRETCH POWER UPRATE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. MD6070)  
MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING STRETCH POWER UPRATE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. MD6070)


==Dear Mr. Christian:==
==Dear Mr. Christian:==


By letter dated July 13, 2007, as supplemented on September 12, 2007, Dominion Nuclear  
By letter dated July 13, 2007, as supplemented on September 12, 2007, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. submitted a stretch power uprate license amendment request for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3. The proposed license amendment would allow an increase in the maximum authorized core power level from 3411 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3650 MWt, and would make changes to the Technical Specifications, as necessary, to support operation at the stretch power level.
 
In order to complete its review of the reports, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff requires responses to the enclosed questions. The questions were sent by e-mail on October 15 and 19, 2007, and were discussed via teleconference on October 23, 2007, with your staff to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Mr. Mohamed Elmaghrabi of your staff agreed to respond within 21 days of the date of this letter.
Connecticut, Inc. submitted a stretch power uprate license amendment request for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3. The proposed license amendment would allow an increase in the maximum authorized core power level from 3411 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3650 MWt, and would make changes to the Technical Specifications, as necessary, to support operation at the stretch power level.  
Please note that if you do not respond to this letter within the prescribed response times or provide an acceptable alternate date in writing, we may reject your application for amendment under the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.108. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (301) 415-3100.
 
Sincerely,
In order to complete its review of the reports, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff requires responses to the enclosed questions. The questions were sent by e-mail on October 15 and 19, 2007, and were discussed via teleconference on October 23, 2007, with your staff to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Mr. Mohamed Elmaghrabi of your staff agreed to respond within 21 days of the date of this letter.  
                                                      /RA/
 
John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-423
Please note that if you do not respond to this letter within the prescribed response times or provide an acceptable alternate date in writing, we may reject your application for amendment under the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.108. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (301) 415-3100.  
 
Sincerely,  
  /RA/
John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Docket No. 50-423  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As stated  
As stated cc w/encl: See next page
 
cc w/encl: See next page


ML072960179
ML072960179
* Concurrence provided by memo OFFICE LPL1-2/PM LPL1-2/LA DCI/CVIB/BC LPL1-2BC NAME JLamb ABaxter MMitchell HChernoff DATE 10 / 25 /07 10 / 25 /07 08/27/07
* Concurrence provided by memo OFFICE LPL1-2/PM             LPL1-2/LA         DCI/CVIB/BC           LPL1-2BC NAME       JLamb             ABaxter           MMitchell             HChernoff DATE       10 / 25 /07       10 / 25 /07       08/27/07
* 10 / 25 /07 Enclosure REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT No. 3 STRETCH POWER UPRATE LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TAC NO. MD6070 DOCKET NO. 50-423 By letter dated July 13, 2007, as supplemented on September 12, 2007, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC or licensee) submitted a stretch power uprate (SPU) license amendment request for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 (MPS3). The proposed license amendment would allow an increase in the maximum authorized core power level from 3411 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3650 MWt, and would make changes to the Technical Specifications, as necessary, to support operation at the stretch power level.  
* 10 / 25 /07 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT No. 3 STRETCH POWER UPRATE LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TAC NO. MD6070 DOCKET NO. 50-423 By letter dated July 13, 2007, as supplemented on September 12, 2007, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC or licensee) submitted a stretch power uprate (SPU) license amendment request for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 (MPS3). The proposed license amendment would allow an increase in the maximum authorized core power level from 3411 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3650 MWt, and would make changes to the Technical Specifications, as necessary, to support operation at the stretch power level.
 
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has been reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has been reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review.  
Vessels & Internals Integrity Branch CVIB-07-001 Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix G, provides fracture toughness requirements for ferritic materials (low alloy steel or carbon steel) materials in the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) components. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G also identifies that RCPB materials must satisfy the criteria in Appendix G of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) to ensure the structural integrity of the ferritic components of the RCPB during any condition of normal operation, including anticipated operational occurrences and hydrostatic tests.
 
Consistent with the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G, the licensee performed fracture toughness analyses of the ferritic reactor vessel (RV) materials.
Vessels & Internals Integrity Branch
The staff requests that the licensee confirm that these analyses bound the fracture toughness requirements of the ferritic RCPB components other than the RV components at MPS3.
 
CVIB-07-002 Section 2.1.2.2-1 delineates the difference between 1/4T neutron fluence (E > 1 MeV) estimated in the license extension application and the value proposed in the current application for SPU, i.e., 1.97x1019 n/cm2 and 1.63x1019 n/cm2, respectively. Similarly, Section 2.1.3.2.3 indicates a similar difference between the peak inside surface vessel fluence to 54 effective full power years (EFPYs) of operation. Apparently, both calculations were carried out using methodologies adhering to the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.190, Calculational and Dosimetry Methods for Determining Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence.
CVIB-07-001
 
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix G, provides fracture toughness requirements for ferritic materials (low alloy steel or carbon steel) materials in the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) components. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G also identifies that RCPB materials must satisfy the criteria in Appendix G of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) to ensure the structural integrity of the ferritic components of the RCPB during any condition of normal operation, including anticipated operational occurrences and hydrostatic tests.  
 
Consistent with the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G, the licensee performed fracture toughness analyses of the ferritic reactor vessel (RV) materials.  
 
The staff requests that the licensee confirm that these analyses bound the fracture toughness requirements of the ferritic RCPB components other than the RV components at MPS3.
 
CVIB-07-002 Section 2.1.2.2-1 delineates the difference between 1/4T neutron fluence (E > 1 MeV) estimated in the license extension application and the value proposed in the current application for SPU, i.e., 1.97x10 19 n/cm 2 and 1.63x10 19 n/cm 2, respectively. Similarly, Section 2.1.3.2.3 indicates a similar difference between the peak inside surface vessel fluence to 54 effective full power years (EFPYs) of operation. Apparently, both calculations were carried out using methodologies adhering to the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.190, "Calculational and Dosimetry Methods for Determining Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence.
 
Please describe the physical reasons that justify the lower fluence value for the 54 EFPYs under SPU conditions.
Please describe the physical reasons that justify the lower fluence value for the 54 EFPYs under SPU conditions.
CVIB-07-003
Enclosure
 
In 2001, one Babcock and Wilcox licensee experienced failures of two control rod drive mechanism 17-4 precipitation hardened (PH) lead screw male couplings. The failures were attributed to thermal embrittlement of the 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel materials.
 
The staff issued NRC Information Notice (IN) 2007-02, AFailure of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Lead Screw Male Coupling at a Babcock and Wilcox Designed Facility.
@  In IN 2007-02, the staff reiterated the importance of implementing frequent visual and surface examinations for identifying thermal embrittlement in 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel reactor vessel internals (RVI) components.


The staff requests that the licensee provide the following information with respect to monitoring the aging degradation of the 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel materials used in RVI components at MPS3: 1. Identify 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel RVI components at MPS3, if any.  
CVIB-07-003 In 2001, one Babcock and Wilcox licensee experienced failures of two control rod drive mechanism 17-4 precipitation hardened (PH) lead screw male couplings. The failures were attributed to thermal embrittlement of the 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel materials.
The staff issued NRC Information Notice (IN) 2007-02, AFailure of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Lead Screw Male Coupling at a Babcock and Wilcox Designed Facility.@ In IN 2007-02, the staff reiterated the importance of implementing frequent visual and surface examinations for identifying thermal embrittlement in 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel reactor vessel internals (RVI) components.
The staff requests that the licensee provide the following information with respect to monitoring the aging degradation of the 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel materials used in RVI components at MPS3:
: 1. Identify 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel RVI components at MPS3, if any.
: 2. Identify the method of inspection that was performed thus far on these components and provide information regarding any aging degradation that was identified thus far in these components.
: 2. Identify the method of inspection that was performed thus far on these components and provide information regarding any aging degradation that was identified thus far in these components.
Balance of Plant Branch
Balance of Plant Branch SBPB-07-004 In Attachment 5, on page 2.5-114, under the section ATurbine Driven Feedwater Pump Turbine Control Valves,@ the licensee stated in the application that A[the] engineering evaluation to confirm whether or not more steam flow is required for turbine driven feedwater pump turbines for SPU conditions is in progress.@
 
The NRC staff cannot initiate a review of this section until the results of the evaluation and a description of any impacts or modifications are submitted.
SBPB-07-004
Please provide the results of the evaluation and a description of any impacts or modifications.
 
SBPB-07-005 In Attachment 5, on page 2.5-22, under the section, ATurbine Results,@ DNC performed high-pressure turbine rotor phased array testing of the tangential-entry dovetail regions of the wheel rim, which revealed indications on the turbine first stage wheel. DNC is currently evaluating either installing a new high-pressure rotor, or disassembling first stage buckets, conducting inspections, removing indications and possible repairs. DNC needs to identify their proposed resolution and affects on the proposed SPU before the NRC staff can complete its review.
In Attachment 5, on page 2.5-114, under the section ATurbine Driven Feedwater Pump Turbine Control Valves,@ the licensee stated in the application that A[the] engineering evaluation to confirm whether or not more steam flow is required for turbine driven feedwater pump turbines for SPU conditions is in progress.
The NRC staff cannot initiate a review of this section until the results of the evaluation and a description of any impacts or modifications are submitted.
 
Please provide the results of the evaluation and a description of any impacts or modifications.  
 
SBPB-07-005
 
In Attachment 5, on page 2.5-22, under the section, ATurbine Results,@ DNC performed high-pressure turbine rotor phased array testing of the tangential-entry dovetail regions of the wheel rim, which revealed indications on the turbine first stage wheel. DNC is currently evaluating either installing a new high-pressure rotor, or disassembling first stage buckets, conducting inspections, removing indications and possible repairs. DNC needs to identify their proposed resolution and affects on the proposed SPU before the NRC staff can complete its review.  
 
Millstone Power Stat ion, Unit No. 3
 
cc:
 
Lillilan M. Cuoco, Esquire Senior Counsel Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Building 475, 5 th Floor Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT  06385
 
Edward L. Wilds, Jr., Ph.D.
Director, Division of Radiation Department of Environmental Protection 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT  06106-5127
 
Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA  19406
 
First Selectmen Town of Waterford 15 Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT  06385
 
Mr. J. W. "Bill" Sheehan  Co-Chair NEAC 19 Laurel Crest Drive Waterford, CT 06385
 
Mr. Evan W. Woollacott Co-Chair Nuclear Energy Advisory Council 128 Terry's Plain Road Simsbury, CT  06070
 
Senior Resident Inspector Millstone Power Station c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 513 Niantic, CT  06357
 
Ms. Nancy Burton 147 Cross Highway Redding Ridge, CT  00870
 
Mr. Joseph Roy, Director of Operations Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company Moody Street P.O. Box 426 Ludlow, MA  01056
 
Mr. J. Alan Price Site Vice President Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Building 475, 5 th Floor Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT  06385
 
Mr. Chris Funderburk Director, Nuclear Licensing and Operations Support Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA  23060-6711


Mr. David W. Dodson Licensing Supervisor Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 cc:
Building 475, 5 th Floor Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT 06385}}
Lillilan M. Cuoco, Esquire            Mr. Joseph Roy, Senior Counsel                        Director of Operations Dominion Resources Services, Inc.      Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Building 475, 5th Floor                Electric Company Rope Ferry Road                        Moody Street Waterford, CT 06385                    P.O. Box 426 Ludlow, MA 01056 Edward L. Wilds, Jr., Ph.D.
Director, Division of Radiation        Mr. J. Alan Price Department of Environmental Protection Site Vice President 79 Elm Street                          Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Hartford, CT 06106-5127                Building 475, 5th Floor Rope Ferry Road Regional Administrator, Region I      Waterford, CT 06385 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road                    Mr. Chris Funderburk King of Prussia, PA 19406              Director, Nuclear Licensing and Operations Support First Selectmen                        Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Town of Waterford                      5000 Dominion Boulevard 15 Rope Ferry Road                    Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711 Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. David W. Dodson Mr. J. W. "Bill" Sheehan              Licensing Supervisor Co-Chair NEAC                          Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
19 Laurel Crest Drive                  Building 475, 5th Floor Waterford, CT 06385                    Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. Evan W. Woollacott Co-Chair Nuclear Energy Advisory Council 128 Terry's Plain Road Simsbury, CT 06070 Senior Resident Inspector Millstone Power Station c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 513 Niantic, CT 06357 Ms. Nancy Burton 147 Cross Highway Redding Ridge, CT 00870}}

Latest revision as of 09:17, 13 March 2020

Request for Additional Information, Stretch Power Uprate Amendment Request
ML072960179
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/29/2007
From: John Lamb
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLI-2
To: Christian D
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
Lamb John G./NRR/DORL, 415-3100
References
TAC MD6070
Download: ML072960179 (5)


Text

October 29, 2007 Mr. David A. Christian President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711

SUBJECT:

MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING STRETCH POWER UPRATE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. MD6070)

Dear Mr. Christian:

By letter dated July 13, 2007, as supplemented on September 12, 2007, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. submitted a stretch power uprate license amendment request for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3. The proposed license amendment would allow an increase in the maximum authorized core power level from 3411 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3650 MWt, and would make changes to the Technical Specifications, as necessary, to support operation at the stretch power level.

In order to complete its review of the reports, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff requires responses to the enclosed questions. The questions were sent by e-mail on October 15 and 19, 2007, and were discussed via teleconference on October 23, 2007, with your staff to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Mr. Mohamed Elmaghrabi of your staff agreed to respond within 21 days of the date of this letter.

Please note that if you do not respond to this letter within the prescribed response times or provide an acceptable alternate date in writing, we may reject your application for amendment under the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.108. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (301) 415-3100.

Sincerely,

/RA/

John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-423

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: See next page

ML072960179

  • Concurrence provided by memo OFFICE LPL1-2/PM LPL1-2/LA DCI/CVIB/BC LPL1-2BC NAME JLamb ABaxter MMitchell HChernoff DATE 10 / 25 /07 10 / 25 /07 08/27/07
  • 10 / 25 /07 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT No. 3 STRETCH POWER UPRATE LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TAC NO. MD6070 DOCKET NO. 50-423 By letter dated July 13, 2007, as supplemented on September 12, 2007, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC or licensee) submitted a stretch power uprate (SPU) license amendment request for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 (MPS3). The proposed license amendment would allow an increase in the maximum authorized core power level from 3411 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3650 MWt, and would make changes to the Technical Specifications, as necessary, to support operation at the stretch power level.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has been reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review.

Vessels & Internals Integrity Branch CVIB-07-001 Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix G, provides fracture toughness requirements for ferritic materials (low alloy steel or carbon steel) materials in the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) components. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G also identifies that RCPB materials must satisfy the criteria in Appendix G of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) to ensure the structural integrity of the ferritic components of the RCPB during any condition of normal operation, including anticipated operational occurrences and hydrostatic tests.

Consistent with the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G, the licensee performed fracture toughness analyses of the ferritic reactor vessel (RV) materials.

The staff requests that the licensee confirm that these analyses bound the fracture toughness requirements of the ferritic RCPB components other than the RV components at MPS3.

CVIB-07-002 Section 2.1.2.2-1 delineates the difference between 1/4T neutron fluence (E > 1 MeV) estimated in the license extension application and the value proposed in the current application for SPU, i.e., 1.97x1019 n/cm2 and 1.63x1019 n/cm2, respectively. Similarly, Section 2.1.3.2.3 indicates a similar difference between the peak inside surface vessel fluence to 54 effective full power years (EFPYs) of operation. Apparently, both calculations were carried out using methodologies adhering to the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.190, Calculational and Dosimetry Methods for Determining Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence.

Please describe the physical reasons that justify the lower fluence value for the 54 EFPYs under SPU conditions.

Enclosure

CVIB-07-003 In 2001, one Babcock and Wilcox licensee experienced failures of two control rod drive mechanism 17-4 precipitation hardened (PH) lead screw male couplings. The failures were attributed to thermal embrittlement of the 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel materials.

The staff issued NRC Information Notice (IN) 2007-02, AFailure of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Lead Screw Male Coupling at a Babcock and Wilcox Designed Facility.@ In IN 2007-02, the staff reiterated the importance of implementing frequent visual and surface examinations for identifying thermal embrittlement in 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel reactor vessel internals (RVI) components.

The staff requests that the licensee provide the following information with respect to monitoring the aging degradation of the 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel materials used in RVI components at MPS3:

1. Identify 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steel RVI components at MPS3, if any.
2. Identify the method of inspection that was performed thus far on these components and provide information regarding any aging degradation that was identified thus far in these components.

Balance of Plant Branch SBPB-07-004 In Attachment 5, on page 2.5-114, under the section ATurbine Driven Feedwater Pump Turbine Control Valves,@ the licensee stated in the application that A[the] engineering evaluation to confirm whether or not more steam flow is required for turbine driven feedwater pump turbines for SPU conditions is in progress.@

The NRC staff cannot initiate a review of this section until the results of the evaluation and a description of any impacts or modifications are submitted.

Please provide the results of the evaluation and a description of any impacts or modifications.

SBPB-07-005 In Attachment 5, on page 2.5-22, under the section, ATurbine Results,@ DNC performed high-pressure turbine rotor phased array testing of the tangential-entry dovetail regions of the wheel rim, which revealed indications on the turbine first stage wheel. DNC is currently evaluating either installing a new high-pressure rotor, or disassembling first stage buckets, conducting inspections, removing indications and possible repairs. DNC needs to identify their proposed resolution and affects on the proposed SPU before the NRC staff can complete its review.

Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 cc:

Lillilan M. Cuoco, Esquire Mr. Joseph Roy, Senior Counsel Director of Operations Dominion Resources Services, Inc. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Building 475, 5th Floor Electric Company Rope Ferry Road Moody Street Waterford, CT 06385 P.O. Box 426 Ludlow, MA 01056 Edward L. Wilds, Jr., Ph.D.

Director, Division of Radiation Mr. J. Alan Price Department of Environmental Protection Site Vice President 79 Elm Street Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Hartford, CT 06106-5127 Building 475, 5th Floor Rope Ferry Road Regional Administrator, Region I Waterford, CT 06385 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Mr. Chris Funderburk King of Prussia, PA 19406 Director, Nuclear Licensing and Operations Support First Selectmen Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

Town of Waterford 5000 Dominion Boulevard 15 Rope Ferry Road Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711 Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. David W. Dodson Mr. J. W. "Bill" Sheehan Licensing Supervisor Co-Chair NEAC Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

19 Laurel Crest Drive Building 475, 5th Floor Waterford, CT 06385 Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. Evan W. Woollacott Co-Chair Nuclear Energy Advisory Council 128 Terry's Plain Road Simsbury, CT 06070 Senior Resident Inspector Millstone Power Station c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 513 Niantic, CT 06357 Ms. Nancy Burton 147 Cross Highway Redding Ridge, CT 00870