ML082740226: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 6, 2008 Mr. Michael D.
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 6, 2008 Mr. Michael D. Wadley Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power - Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089
Wadley Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power -Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 -ISSUANCE OF AIVIENDMENTS RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT TO REVISE CONTAINMENT SPRAY NOZZLE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. MD7362 AND MD7363)  
 
==SUBJECT:==
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OF AIVIENDMENTS RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT TO REVISE CONTAINMENT SPRAY NOZZLE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. MD7362 AND MD7363)


==Dear Mr. Wadley:==
==Dear Mr. Wadley:==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 190 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 19,2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008. The amendments replace the current fixed Frequency for testing the containment spray nozzles in Surveillance Requirement 3.6.5.8 with a maintenance or event based Frequency. A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely, Thomas J\,)engert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306  
 
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 190 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 19,2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008.
The amendments replace the current fixed Frequency for testing the containment spray nozzles in Surveillance Requirement 3.6.5.8 with a maintenance or event based Frequency.
A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                  ~"--'~1~
Thomas J\,)engert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 190 to DPR-42
: 1. Amendment No. 190 to DPR-42
: 2. Amendment No. 179 to DPR-60
: 2. Amendment No. 179 to DPR-60
: 3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY' DOCKET NO. 50-282 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 190 License No.
: 3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ
DPR-42 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC'" (the licensee), dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7, 2008, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 is hereby amended to read as follows:
 
* On September 22,2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3, 2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY' DOCKET NO. 50-282 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 190 License No. DPR-42
-2 Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 190, are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i .'A.-_ "J' \\,
: 1.      The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
,'\" -.1.....J..'. -,
A. The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC'"
* Lois M. James, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
(the licensee), dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7, 2008, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
: 2.      Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 is hereby amended to read as follows:
* On September 22,2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3, 2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.
 
                                                    -2 Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 190, are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
: 3. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                              / J
                                          ~
i
                                          ~    .'. A.-
                                                  '. _"J' \ \
                                                              ,**.*~..i ,'\" -.1.....J Lois M. James, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: November 6, 2008 UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NORTHERN STATES POWER DOCKET NO. PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING Amendment No. 179 License No. DPR-60 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC* (the licensee), dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7, 2008, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: November 6, 2008
* On September 22, 2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3, 2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.
 
-2 Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 179 ,are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cJc:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY' DOCKET NO. 50-306 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 179 License No. DPR-60
d Lois M. James, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
: 1.      The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A. The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC*
(the licensee), dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7, 2008, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
: 2.      Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 is hereby amended to read as follows:
* On September 22, 2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3, 2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.
 
                                                -2 Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 179 ,are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
: 3. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cJc: ~ "?f'~"C Lois M. James, Chief d
Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: November 6, 2008 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NOS. 190 AND 179 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-42 AND DPR-60 DOCKET NOS. 50-282 AND 50-306 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and DPR-60 with the attached revised pages. The changed areas are identified by a marginal line.
Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:   November 6, 2008
REMOVE INSERT DPR-42, License Page 3 DPR-42, License Page 3 DPR-60, License Page 3 DPR-60, License Page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
 
REMOVE INSERT 3.6.5-4 3.6.5-4 Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, NSPM to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument and equipment calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility; Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to transfer byproduct materials from other job sites owned by NSPM for the purpose of volume reduction and decontamination. This amended license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below: Maximum Power Level NSPM is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 1650 megawatts thermal. Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 190 ,are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. Physical Protection NSPM shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled: "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program," Revision 1, submitted by letters dated October 18, 2006, and January 10, 2007. Unit 1 Amendment No. 190 Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility; Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to transfer byproduct materials from other job sites owned by NSPM for the purpose of volume reduction and decontamination. This amended license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below: Maximum Power Level NSPM is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 1650 megawatts thermal. Technical Specifications The Technical Speci"fications contained in Appendix A, as revised through ( Amendment No. 179 , are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. Physical Protection NSPM shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled: "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program," Revision 1, submitted by letters dated October 18, 2006, and January 10, 2007. Unit 2 Amendment No. 179 Containment Spray and Cooling Systems 3.6.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NOS. 190 AND 179 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-42 AND DPR-60 DOCKET NOS. 50-282 AND 50-306 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and DPR-60 with the attached revised pages. The changed areas are identified by a marginal line.
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.5.7 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. 24 months SR 3.6.5.8 Verify each spray nozzle is unobstructed.
REMOVE                             INSERT DPR-42, License Page 3             DPR-42, License Page 3 DPR-60, License Page 3             DPR-60, License Page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Following maintenance which could result in nozzle blockage Unit 1 -Amendment No. m 190 Prairie Island Unit 2 -Amendment No. +49 179Units I and 2 3.6.5-4 UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 190 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-42 AND AMENDMENT NO. 179 TO FACILITY OPERATION LICENSE NO. DPR-60 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANy 1 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-282 AND 50-306  
REMOVE                             INSERT 3.6.5-4                             3.6.5-4
 
                                              -3 (4)  Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, NSPM to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument and equipment calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; (5)  Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility; (6)  Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to transfer byproduct materials from other job sites owned by NSPM for the purpose of volume reduction and decontamination.
C. This amended license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1)  Maximum Power Level NSPM is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 1650 megawatts thermal.
(2)  Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 190 ,are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
(3)  Physical Protection NSPM shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled: "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program," Revision 1, submitted by letters dated October 18, 2006, and January 10, 2007.
Unit 1 Amendment No. 190
 
                                              -3 (5)  Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility; (6)  Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to transfer byproduct materials from other job sites owned by NSPM for the purpose of volume reduction and decontamination.
C. This amended license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1)  Maximum Power Level NSPM is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 1650 megawatts thermal.
(2)  Technical Specifications The Technical Speci"fications contained in Appendix A, as revised through                 (
Amendment No. 179 , are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
(3)  Physical Protection NSPM shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled:
        "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program," Revision 1, submitted by letters dated October 18, 2006, and January 10, 2007.
Unit 2 Amendment No. 179
 
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems 3.6.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE                                 FREQUENCY SR 3.6.5.7   Verify each containment cooling train starts           24 months automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
SR 3.6.5.8   Verify each spray nozzle is unobstructed.             Following maintenance which could result in nozzle blockage Prairie Island                                          Unit 1 - Amendment No. m 190 Units I and 2                             3.6.5-4       Unit 2 - Amendment No. +49 179
 
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 190 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-42 AND AMENDMENT NO. 179 TO FACILITY OPERATION LICENSE NO. DPR-60 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANy1 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-282 AND 50-306


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==


By application dated November 19, 2007 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML073240086), as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML081290287), Nuclear Management Company, LLC 1 (the licensee), requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 (PINGP). The proposed changes would revise the testing frequency of the containment spray (CS) nozzles as specified in TS Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.5.8. Specifically, the testing frequency for the CS nozzles is revised from 10 years to "following maintenance which could result in nozzle blockage." The PINGP CS system consists of two trains each consisting of a CS pump, spray headers with associated power supplies, piping and valves.
By application dated November 19, 2007 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML073240086), as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML081290287), Nuclear Management Company, LLC 1 (the licensee),
Attached to the spray headers are SPRACO Type 1713 nozzles. The nozzles are connected to four 360-degree ring headers with two ring headers per train and 84 nozzles per train (42 on each ring header). The nozzles have 3/8-inch diameter orifices. The licensee stated that these nozzles are not subject to clogging by particles less than 1/4-inch in maximum dimension. Either train provides adequate coverage of the containment volume. The PINGP Updated Safety Analysis Report, Section 6.4, provides additional information on the CS system. Currently, PINGP TS SR 3.6.5.8 requires verification every 10 years that each CS nozzle is unobstructed.
requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 (PINGP). The proposed changes would revise the testing frequency of the containment spray (CS) nozzles as specified in TS Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.5.8. Specifically, the testing frequency for the CS nozzles is revised from 10 years to "following maintenance which could result in nozzle blockage."
The licensee performs this verification by blowing smoke or air through the nozzles. The proposed revision to SR 3.6.5.8 requires verification that each spray nozzle is unobstructed following maintenance that could result in nozzle blockage.
The PINGP CS system consists of two trains each consisting of a CS pump, spray headers with associated power supplies, piping and valves. Attached to the spray headers are SPRACO Type 1713 nozzles. The nozzles are connected to four 360-degree ring headers with two ring headers per train and 84 nozzles per train (42 on each ring header). The nozzles have 3/8-inch diameter orifices. The licensee stated that these nozzles are not subject to clogging by particles less than 1/4-inch in maximum dimension. Either train provides adequate coverage of the containment volume. The PINGP Updated Safety Analysis Report, Section 6.4, provides additional information on the CS system.
Testing of the containment spray nozzles would not be required following CS system maintenance activities which successfully comply with the licensee's foreign material exclusion program. IOnSeptember22, 2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern StatesPower Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). Byletterdated September3,2008, NSPM statedthatit would assume responsibilityforactionsand commitments submitted by NMC.
Currently, PINGP TS SR 3.6.5.8 requires verification every 10 years that each CS nozzle is unobstructed. The licensee performs this verification by blowing smoke or air through the nozzles.
-2 2.0 REGULATORY The initial PINGP construction permit was issued by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in June 1968. This is prior to the date specified in SECY 92-223 2 as the date for compliance with the General Design Criteria (GDC) of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix A. The enclosure to the licensee's November 19, 2007, application states that PINGP was designed and constructed to comply with Northern States Power Company's understanding of the intent of the AEC GDC for Nuclear Power Plant Construction Permits, as proposed on July 10, 1967.
The proposed revision to SR 3.6.5.8 requires verification that each spray nozzle is unobstructed following maintenance that could result in nozzle blockage. Testing of the containment spray nozzles would not be required following CS system maintenance activities which successfully comply with the licensee's foreign material exclusion program.
The applicable GDC for this change are Criterion 38, Reliability and Testability of Engineered Safety Features, and Criterion 60, Testing of Containment Spray Systems. Criterion 38 states, in part, that all engineered safety features shall be designed to provide high functional reliability and ready testability. Revising the TSs so that flow testing of the CS nozzles is contingent on loss of foreign material controls does not reduce the reliability of the CS system since loss of foreign material control is the only identified mechanism by which blockage of spray nozzles could occur. Criterion 60 states that a capability shall be provided to test periodically the delivery capability of the containment spray system at a position as close to the spray nozzles as is practical. This change does not affect the flow testing of pumps, only verification that the spray nozzles are not clogged. Although periodic nozzle flow testing will not be required when this change is implemented, reasonable assurance is still provided that the spray nozzles can perform their safety function.
I On September22, 2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3,2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION The CS system piping that may be in contact with borated water is made of austenitic stainless steel, which is resistant to corrosion.
 
The licensee stated that the spray lines within the containment may be filled with borated water up to the 770-foot elevation, which is below the elevation at which water would enter the spray headers and nozzles (880-foot elevation).
                                                  -2
This assures that the spray nozzles remain dry during normal plant operation. Due to their location at the top of the containment, introduction of foreign material exterior to the headers is unlikely.
 
Because maintenance that could introduce foreign material is the most likely cause for obstruction, testing or inspection following such maintenance would suffice to verify the system's capability to perform its safety function.
==2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION==
Therefore, the 1a-year test frequency is unnecessary. Verifying that the nozzles are not obstructed following maintenance that could introduce foreign materials internal to the spray ring headers (due, for example, to a loss of foreign material control) is more appropriate. The TS bases, provided for informational purposes by the licensee in its November 19, 2007 letter, discuss options includinq visual inspection of affected portions of the system, air or smoke tests, and draining and flushing of the system.
 
2 Memorandum for James M. Taylor.
The initial PINGP construction permit was issued by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in June 1968. This is prior to the date specified in SECY 92-223 2 as the date for compliance with the General Design Criteria (GDC) of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix A. The enclosure to the licensee's November 19, 2007, application states that PINGP was designed and constructed to comply with Northern States Power Company's understanding of the intent of the AEC GDC for Nuclear Power Plant Construction Permits, as proposed on July 10, 1967.
Executive Director for Operations. from Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary, Resolution of Deviations Identified During the Systematic Evaluation Program, SECY 92-223, September 18, 1992.
The applicable GDC for this change are Criterion 38, Reliability and Testability of Engineered Safety Features, and Criterion 60, Testing of Containment Spray Systems.
-3Review of industry experience indicates that CS systems of similar design are highly reliable and are not subject to plugging after post-construction testing. 3.1 Prairie Island Experience PINGP Unit 1 CS nozzle air flow tests were conducted in 1978, 1982, 1988, 1992 and 2001, as required by the TSs. These tests confirmed that the nozzles were not plugged. The licensee did state that there were "anecdotal accounts" of an inadvertent CS pump actuation in 1974 during the Unit 1 startup activities. However, the licensee states that the pump was secured before the containment was sprayed down.
Criterion 38 states, in part, that all engineered safety features shall be designed to provide high functional reliability and ready testability. Revising the TSs so that flow testing of the CS nozzles is contingent on loss of foreign material controls does not reduce the reliability of the CS system since loss of foreign material control is the only identified mechanism by which blockage of spray nozzles could occur.
Subsequently, the system was flushed, cleaned, and tested to verify that it was free of obstructions.
Criterion 60 states that a capability shall be provided to test periodically the delivery capability of the containment spray system at a position as close to the spray nozzles as is practical. This change does not affect the flow testing of pumps, only verification that the spray nozzles are not clogged. Although periodic nozzle flow testing will not be required when this change is implemented, reasonable assurance is still provided that the spray nozzles can perform their safety function.
Subsequent nozzle flow testing verified that the nozzles remained free of obstructions.
 
==3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
 
The CS system piping that may be in contact with borated water is made of austenitic stainless steel, which is resistant to corrosion.
The licensee stated that the spray lines within the containment may be filled with borated water up to the 770-foot elevation, which is below the elevation at which water would enter the spray headers and nozzles (880-foot elevation). This assures that the spray nozzles remain dry during normal plant operation.
Due to their location at the top of the containment, introduction of foreign material exterior to the headers is unlikely. Because maintenance that could introduce foreign material is the most likely cause for obstruction, testing or inspection following such maintenance would suffice to verify the system's capability to perform its safety function. Therefore, the 1a-year test frequency is unnecessary. Verifying that the nozzles are not obstructed following maintenance that could introduce foreign materials internal to the spray ring headers (due, for example, to a loss of foreign material control) is more appropriate. The TS bases, provided for informational purposes by the licensee in its November 19, 2007 letter, discuss options includinq visual inspection of affected portions of the system, air or smoke tests, and draining and flushing of the system.
2 Memorandum for James M. Taylor. Executive Director for Operations. from Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary, Resolution of Deviations Identified During the Systematic Evaluation Program, SECY 92-223, September 18, 1992.
 
                                                -3 Review of industry experience indicates that CS systems of similar design are highly reliable and are not subject to plugging after post-construction testing.
3.1     Prairie Island Experience PINGP Unit 1 CS nozzle air flow tests were conducted in 1978, 1982, 1988, 1992 and 2001, as required by the TSs. These tests confirmed that the nozzles were not plugged. The licensee did state that there were "anecdotal accounts" of an inadvertent CS pump actuation in 1974 during the Unit 1 startup activities. However, the licensee states that the pump was secured before the containment was sprayed down. Subsequently, the system was flushed, cleaned, and tested to verify that it was free of obstructions. Subsequent nozzle flow testing verified that the nozzles remained free of obstructions.
The licensee also reports that, since the last nozzle flow test on Unit 1, foreign material exclusion (FME) program controls were lost on Unit 1 during modifications on the system. The licensee describes this event and the corrective actions taken as a result of this event in a May 7,2008, letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). During a 2004 refueling outage, foreign material was introduced into the system as a result of in-place machining of some of the system's valves. The foreign material was discovered when a check valve in the system failed a local leak rate test. The licensee subsequently strengthened the foreign material exclusion program. Among other changes, pipe dams and temporary covers are considered during operations such as grinding, valve lapping or filing. In 2005, the same valve machining did not cause an FME problem.
The licensee also reports that, since the last nozzle flow test on Unit 1, foreign material exclusion (FME) program controls were lost on Unit 1 during modifications on the system. The licensee describes this event and the corrective actions taken as a result of this event in a May 7,2008, letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). During a 2004 refueling outage, foreign material was introduced into the system as a result of in-place machining of some of the system's valves. The foreign material was discovered when a check valve in the system failed a local leak rate test. The licensee subsequently strengthened the foreign material exclusion program. Among other changes, pipe dams and temporary covers are considered during operations such as grinding, valve lapping or filing. In 2005, the same valve machining did not cause an FME problem.
The licensee will designate the CS system as a system for which Very High foreign material control requirements will be applied. The licensee's May 7,2008, letter describes the requirements for Very High foreign material control.
The licensee will designate the CS system as a system for which Very High foreign material control requirements will be applied. The licensee's May 7,2008, letter describes the requirements for Very High foreign material control.
3.2 Industry Experience and Failure Mechanisms An NRC staff review of industry experience using the NRC's Sequence Coding and Search System for Licensee Event Reports indicates that spray systems of similar design are highly reliable (i.e., not susceptible to plugging). The staff found that, with a few exceptions, once successfully tested after construction, CS nozzles have not been subject to blockage. There have been several exceptions. In the case of one pressurized-water reactor (PWR) that is no longer operating, a chemical added to the inner surface of a spray system pipe to eliminate a corrosion problem detached and the loose material blocked some spray nozzles. Spray piping in currently operating PWRs, and in particular, that at PINGP is corrosion resistant; therefore, this failure mechanism is not applicable to PINGP. The licensee for another PWR found debris, identified as construction debris, in the spray nozzle headers. The fraction of blockage was not significant and the sprays remained functional.
3.2     Industry Experience and Failure Mechanisms An NRC staff review of industry experience using the NRC's Sequence Coding and Search System for Licensee Event Reports indicates that spray systems of similar design are highly reliable (i.e., not susceptible to plugging). The staff found that, with a few exceptions, once successfully tested after construction, CS nozzles have not been subject to blockage. There have been several exceptions.
The debris was found by visual observation, not by an air flow test.
In the case of one pressurized-water reactor (PWR) that is no longer operating, a chemical added to the inner surface of a spray system pipe to eliminate a corrosion problem detached and the loose material blocked some spray nozzles. Spray piping in currently operating PWRs, and in particular, that at PINGP is corrosion resistant; therefore, this failure mechanism is not applicable to PINGP.
Other problems have been identified in CS and fire protection systems in which water leakage resulted in corrosion and partial blockage. As discussed above, the PINGP design effectively
The licensee for another PWR found debris, identified as construction debris, in the spray nozzle headers. The fraction of blockage was not significant and the sprays remained functional. The debris was found by visual observation, not by an air flow test.
-4precludes this condition since the piping, spray ring headers, and nozzles are of corrosion-resistant stainless steel, thereby precluding the formation of significant corrosion products.
Other problems have been identified in CS and fire protection systems in which water leakage resulted in corrosion and partial blockage. As discussed above, the PINGP design effectively
3.3 Summary The NRC staff finds the licensee's proposed change to TS SR 3.6.5.8 to be acceptable based on industry experience, experience at PINGP, and the designation of the CS system as a system for which the foreign material controls are designated Very High.
 
                                                  -4 precludes this condition since the piping, spray ring headers, and nozzles are of corrosion-resistant stainless steel, thereby precluding the formation of significant corrosion products.
3.3     Summary The NRC staff finds the licensee's proposed change to TS SR 3.6.5.8 to be acceptable based on industry experience, experience at PINGP, and the designation of the CS system as a system for which the foreign material controls are designated Very High.
4.0 STATE CONSULTATIOI\I In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Minnesota State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
4.0 STATE CONSULTATIOI\I In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Minnesota State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION The amendment changes the requirements with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (72 FR 71713). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
 
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.  
==5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
 
The amendment changes the requirements with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (72 FR 71713). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.


==6.0 CONCLUSION==
==6.0 CONCLUSION==


The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. Principal Contributor:
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
R. Lobel, NRR Date: November 6, 2008 November 6, 2008 Mr. Michael D.
Principal Contributor: R. Lobel, NRR Date: November 6, 2008
Wadley Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power -
 
Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 -
November 6, 2008 Mr. Michael D. Wadley Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power - Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089
ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT TO REVISE CONTAINMENT SPRAY NOZZLE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. MD7362 AND MD7363)  
 
==SUBJECT:==
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT TO REVISE CONTAINMENT SPRAY NOZZLE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. MD7362 AND MD7363)


==Dear Mr. Wadley:==
==Dear Mr. Wadley:==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 190 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008. The amendments replace the current fixed Frequency for testing the containment spray nozzles in Surveillance Requirement 3.6.5.8 with a maintenance or event based Frequency. A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely, lRAI Thomas J. Wengert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306  
 
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 190 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008.
The amendments replace the current fixed Frequency for testing the containment spray nozzles in Surveillance Requirement 3.6.5.8 with a maintenance or event based Frequency.
A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,     lRAI Thomas J. Wengert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 190 to DPR-42
: 1. Amendment No. 190 to DPR-42
: 2. Amendment No. 179 to DPR-60 3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL3-1 r/f RidsNrrLATHarris Resource RidsOGCRpResource RidsAcrsAcnw
: 2. Amendment No. 179 to DPR-60
_MailCTRResource RidsNrrDssScvb G. Hill, OIS RidsRgn3MailCenterResource R. Lobel, NRR RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMPrairielsandResource RidsNrrDorlLPL3-'1 Resource RidsNrrDirsltsbResource ADAMS ACCESSION' ML082740226 PKG' ML082740146 TS' ML082740280 OFFICE NRR/LPL3-1/PM NRR/LPL3-1/LA NRR/DSS/SCVC (BC) NRR/DLR/RER1 (BC) OGC NRR/LPL3-1/BC NAME RDennig* 9/8/08 JDozier 10109/08 BMizuno 10/17/08 DATE to 1:3 1/08 \J
: 3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC                       LPL3-1 r/f                                     RidsNrrLATHarris Resource RidsOGCRpResource           RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTRResource                  RidsNrrDssScvb G. Hill, OIS                 RidsRgn3MailCenterResource                     R. Lobel, NRR RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMPrairielsandResource                       RidsNrrDorlLPL3-'1 Resource RidsNrrDirsltsbResource ADAMS ACCESSION' ML082740226 PKG' ML082740146 TS' ML082740280 OFFICE       NRR/LPL3-1/PM       NRR/LPL3-1/LA NRR/DSS/SCVC (BC)   NRR/DLR/RER1 (BC)   OGC           NRR/LPL3-1/BC NAME         TWengert~                          RDennig*           JDozier              BMizuno DATE        to 1:3 1/08  \J                      9/8/08             10109/08             10/17/08
* SE transmitted by memo of 918108 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
* SE transmitted by memo of 918108           OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}

Latest revision as of 20:04, 12 March 2020

License Amendment, Revise Containment Spray Nozzle Surveillance Requirements
ML082740226
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/2008
From: Thomas Wengert
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Wadley M
Northern States Power Co
Wengert, Thomas J, NRR/DORL, 415-4037
Shared Package
ML082740146 List:
References
TAC MD7362, TAC MD7363
Download: ML082740226 (14)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 6, 2008 Mr. Michael D. Wadley Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power - Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089

SUBJECT:

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OF AIVIENDMENTS RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT TO REVISE CONTAINMENT SPRAY NOZZLE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. MD7362 AND MD7363)

Dear Mr. Wadley:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 190 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 19,2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008.

The amendments replace the current fixed Frequency for testing the containment spray nozzles in Surveillance Requirement 3.6.5.8 with a maintenance or event based Frequency.

A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

~"--'~1~

Thomas J\,)engert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 190 to DPR-42
2. Amendment No. 179 to DPR-60
3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY' DOCKET NO. 50-282 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 190 License No. DPR-42

1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC'"

(the licensee), dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7, 2008, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 is hereby amended to read as follows:
  • On September 22,2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3, 2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.

-2 Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 190, are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

3. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/ J

~

i

~ .'. A.-

'. _"J' \ \

,**.*~..i ,'\" -.1.....J Lois M. James, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: November 6, 2008

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY' DOCKET NO. 50-306 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 179 License No. DPR-60

1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC*

(the licensee), dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7, 2008, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 is hereby amended to read as follows:
  • On September 22, 2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3, 2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.

-2 Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 179 ,are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

3. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cJc: ~ "?f'~"C Lois M. James, Chief d

Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: November 6, 2008

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NOS. 190 AND 179 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-42 AND DPR-60 DOCKET NOS. 50-282 AND 50-306 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and DPR-60 with the attached revised pages. The changed areas are identified by a marginal line.

REMOVE INSERT DPR-42, License Page 3 DPR-42, License Page 3 DPR-60, License Page 3 DPR-60, License Page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

REMOVE INSERT 3.6.5-4 3.6.5-4

-3 (4) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, NSPM to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument and equipment calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; (5) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility; (6) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to transfer byproduct materials from other job sites owned by NSPM for the purpose of volume reduction and decontamination.

C. This amended license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:

(1) Maximum Power Level NSPM is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 1650 megawatts thermal.

(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 190 ,are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

(3) Physical Protection NSPM shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled: "Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program," Revision 1, submitted by letters dated October 18, 2006, and January 10, 2007.

Unit 1 Amendment No. 190

-3 (5) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility; (6) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, NSPM to transfer byproduct materials from other job sites owned by NSPM for the purpose of volume reduction and decontamination.

C. This amended license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:

(1) Maximum Power Level NSPM is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 1650 megawatts thermal.

(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Speci"fications contained in Appendix A, as revised through (

Amendment No. 179 , are hereby incorporated in the license. NSPM shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

(3) Physical Protection NSPM shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled:

"Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program," Revision 1, submitted by letters dated October 18, 2006, and January 10, 2007.

Unit 2 Amendment No. 179

Containment Spray and Cooling Systems 3.6.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.5.7 Verify each containment cooling train starts 24 months automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal.

SR 3.6.5.8 Verify each spray nozzle is unobstructed. Following maintenance which could result in nozzle blockage Prairie Island Unit 1 - Amendment No. m 190 Units I and 2 3.6.5-4 Unit 2 - Amendment No. +49 179

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 190 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-42 AND AMENDMENT NO. 179 TO FACILITY OPERATION LICENSE NO. DPR-60 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANy1 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-282 AND 50-306

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By application dated November 19, 2007 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML073240086), as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML081290287), Nuclear Management Company, LLC 1 (the licensee),

requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 (PINGP). The proposed changes would revise the testing frequency of the containment spray (CS) nozzles as specified in TS Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.5.8. Specifically, the testing frequency for the CS nozzles is revised from 10 years to "following maintenance which could result in nozzle blockage."

The PINGP CS system consists of two trains each consisting of a CS pump, spray headers with associated power supplies, piping and valves. Attached to the spray headers are SPRACO Type 1713 nozzles. The nozzles are connected to four 360-degree ring headers with two ring headers per train and 84 nozzles per train (42 on each ring header). The nozzles have 3/8-inch diameter orifices. The licensee stated that these nozzles are not subject to clogging by particles less than 1/4-inch in maximum dimension. Either train provides adequate coverage of the containment volume. The PINGP Updated Safety Analysis Report, Section 6.4, provides additional information on the CS system.

Currently, PINGP TS SR 3.6.5.8 requires verification every 10 years that each CS nozzle is unobstructed. The licensee performs this verification by blowing smoke or air through the nozzles.

The proposed revision to SR 3.6.5.8 requires verification that each spray nozzle is unobstructed following maintenance that could result in nozzle blockage. Testing of the containment spray nozzles would not be required following CS system maintenance activities which successfully comply with the licensee's foreign material exclusion program.

I On September22, 2008, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), transferred its operating authority to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation (NSPM). By letter dated September 3,2008, NSPM stated that it would assume responsibility for actions and commitments submitted by NMC.

-2

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The initial PINGP construction permit was issued by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in June 1968. This is prior to the date specified in SECY 92-223 2 as the date for compliance with the General Design Criteria (GDC) of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix A. The enclosure to the licensee's November 19, 2007, application states that PINGP was designed and constructed to comply with Northern States Power Company's understanding of the intent of the AEC GDC for Nuclear Power Plant Construction Permits, as proposed on July 10, 1967.

The applicable GDC for this change are Criterion 38, Reliability and Testability of Engineered Safety Features, and Criterion 60, Testing of Containment Spray Systems.

Criterion 38 states, in part, that all engineered safety features shall be designed to provide high functional reliability and ready testability. Revising the TSs so that flow testing of the CS nozzles is contingent on loss of foreign material controls does not reduce the reliability of the CS system since loss of foreign material control is the only identified mechanism by which blockage of spray nozzles could occur.

Criterion 60 states that a capability shall be provided to test periodically the delivery capability of the containment spray system at a position as close to the spray nozzles as is practical. This change does not affect the flow testing of pumps, only verification that the spray nozzles are not clogged. Although periodic nozzle flow testing will not be required when this change is implemented, reasonable assurance is still provided that the spray nozzles can perform their safety function.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The CS system piping that may be in contact with borated water is made of austenitic stainless steel, which is resistant to corrosion.

The licensee stated that the spray lines within the containment may be filled with borated water up to the 770-foot elevation, which is below the elevation at which water would enter the spray headers and nozzles (880-foot elevation). This assures that the spray nozzles remain dry during normal plant operation.

Due to their location at the top of the containment, introduction of foreign material exterior to the headers is unlikely. Because maintenance that could introduce foreign material is the most likely cause for obstruction, testing or inspection following such maintenance would suffice to verify the system's capability to perform its safety function. Therefore, the 1a-year test frequency is unnecessary. Verifying that the nozzles are not obstructed following maintenance that could introduce foreign materials internal to the spray ring headers (due, for example, to a loss of foreign material control) is more appropriate. The TS bases, provided for informational purposes by the licensee in its November 19, 2007 letter, discuss options includinq visual inspection of affected portions of the system, air or smoke tests, and draining and flushing of the system.

2 Memorandum for James M. Taylor. Executive Director for Operations. from Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary, Resolution of Deviations Identified During the Systematic Evaluation Program, SECY 92-223, September 18, 1992.

-3 Review of industry experience indicates that CS systems of similar design are highly reliable and are not subject to plugging after post-construction testing.

3.1 Prairie Island Experience PINGP Unit 1 CS nozzle air flow tests were conducted in 1978, 1982, 1988, 1992 and 2001, as required by the TSs. These tests confirmed that the nozzles were not plugged. The licensee did state that there were "anecdotal accounts" of an inadvertent CS pump actuation in 1974 during the Unit 1 startup activities. However, the licensee states that the pump was secured before the containment was sprayed down. Subsequently, the system was flushed, cleaned, and tested to verify that it was free of obstructions. Subsequent nozzle flow testing verified that the nozzles remained free of obstructions.

The licensee also reports that, since the last nozzle flow test on Unit 1, foreign material exclusion (FME) program controls were lost on Unit 1 during modifications on the system. The licensee describes this event and the corrective actions taken as a result of this event in a May 7,2008, letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). During a 2004 refueling outage, foreign material was introduced into the system as a result of in-place machining of some of the system's valves. The foreign material was discovered when a check valve in the system failed a local leak rate test. The licensee subsequently strengthened the foreign material exclusion program. Among other changes, pipe dams and temporary covers are considered during operations such as grinding, valve lapping or filing. In 2005, the same valve machining did not cause an FME problem.

The licensee will designate the CS system as a system for which Very High foreign material control requirements will be applied. The licensee's May 7,2008, letter describes the requirements for Very High foreign material control.

3.2 Industry Experience and Failure Mechanisms An NRC staff review of industry experience using the NRC's Sequence Coding and Search System for Licensee Event Reports indicates that spray systems of similar design are highly reliable (i.e., not susceptible to plugging). The staff found that, with a few exceptions, once successfully tested after construction, CS nozzles have not been subject to blockage. There have been several exceptions.

In the case of one pressurized-water reactor (PWR) that is no longer operating, a chemical added to the inner surface of a spray system pipe to eliminate a corrosion problem detached and the loose material blocked some spray nozzles. Spray piping in currently operating PWRs, and in particular, that at PINGP is corrosion resistant; therefore, this failure mechanism is not applicable to PINGP.

The licensee for another PWR found debris, identified as construction debris, in the spray nozzle headers. The fraction of blockage was not significant and the sprays remained functional. The debris was found by visual observation, not by an air flow test.

Other problems have been identified in CS and fire protection systems in which water leakage resulted in corrosion and partial blockage. As discussed above, the PINGP design effectively

-4 precludes this condition since the piping, spray ring headers, and nozzles are of corrosion-resistant stainless steel, thereby precluding the formation of significant corrosion products.

3.3 Summary The NRC staff finds the licensee's proposed change to TS SR 3.6.5.8 to be acceptable based on industry experience, experience at PINGP, and the designation of the CS system as a system for which the foreign material controls are designated Very High.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATIOI\I In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Minnesota State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendment changes the requirements with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (72 FR 71713). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),

no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

Principal Contributor: R. Lobel, NRR Date: November 6, 2008

November 6, 2008 Mr. Michael D. Wadley Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power - Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089

SUBJECT:

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT TO REVISE CONTAINMENT SPRAY NOZZLE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. MD7362 AND MD7363)

Dear Mr. Wadley:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 190 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-42 and Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 19, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated May 7,2008.

The amendments replace the current fixed Frequency for testing the containment spray nozzles in Surveillance Requirement 3.6.5.8 with a maintenance or event based Frequency.

A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely, lRAI Thomas J. Wengert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 190 to DPR-42
2. Amendment No. 179 to DPR-60
3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL3-1 r/f RidsNrrLATHarris Resource RidsOGCRpResource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTRResource RidsNrrDssScvb G. Hill, OIS RidsRgn3MailCenterResource R. Lobel, NRR RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMPrairielsandResource RidsNrrDorlLPL3-'1 Resource RidsNrrDirsltsbResource ADAMS ACCESSION' ML082740226 PKG' ML082740146 TS' ML082740280 OFFICE NRR/LPL3-1/PM NRR/LPL3-1/LA NRR/DSS/SCVC (BC) NRR/DLR/RER1 (BC) OGC NRR/LPL3-1/BC NAME TWengert~ RDennig* JDozier BMizuno DATE to 1:3 1/08 \J 9/8/08 10109/08 10/17/08
  • SE transmitted by memo of 918108 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY