ML093490876: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML093490876 | | number = ML093490876 | ||
| issue date = 12/15/2009 | | issue date = 12/15/2009 | ||
| title = | | title = Meeting Slides from December 15, 2009 - Mellla+ LAR | ||
| author name = Gunderson L | | author name = Gunderson L | ||
| author affiliation = Xcel Energy | | author affiliation = Xcel Energy | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000263 | | docket = 05000263 | ||
| license number = DPR-022 | | license number = DPR-022 | ||
| contact person = Tam P | | contact person = Tam P | ||
| case reference number = TAC ME2449 | | case reference number = TAC ME2449 | ||
| package number = ML093451640 | | package number = ML093451640 | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:MELLLA+ LAR I I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1 Attendees AI Williams | {{#Wiki_filter:MELLLA+ LAR I I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1 | ||
MELLLA+ | |||
Attendees AI Williams Project Manager - EPU & MELLLA+ | |||
Steve Hammer Project Manager Lynne Gunderson Projects Licensing Manager Doug Blair Licensing Support Ralph Hayes Licensing Support Juswald Vedovi GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Mike Lalor GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Agenda | |||
* Meeting Purpose | * Meeting Purpose | ||
* Background | * Background | ||
Line 28: | Line 35: | ||
* Schedule | * Schedule | ||
* Discussion 3 | * Discussion 3 | ||
Meeting Purpose Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR Discuss Schedule Concurrent review with EPU 4 Background BWR Operation | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Meeting Purpose | |||
* Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR | |||
* Discuss Schedule | |||
* Concurrent review with EPU 4 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
===Background=== | |||
BWR Operation | |||
* Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up | * Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up | ||
* Control Rod Movements | * Control Rod Movements | ||
* Core Flow Adjustments | * Core Flow Adjustments - preferred method | ||
-preferred method | |||
* EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power | * EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power | ||
* Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power | * Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power | ||
* M+ justifies | * M+ justifies >800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5 | ||
>800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr .... | BackfJround Core Flow (% of Rated} | ||
_ .... | 0 10 20 1) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 120 Power Flow 110 A 'l.n ~+.l1I> | ||
-_:.. -or"" __ .. __; ...... Cumnt Licensed Boundazy MEU.l.A Operating | 100% CLTP = 2004 M\IIJI ..... ~ . " " .,. ~ ; , '..... . -" .. | ||
i 100% CLTP = 1670 MWI B lO.n; ~5'.5'~ MEI.l.LA+ Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr C '5' .l1I> +~.~~ i i q | |||
--.--------Flow Region .:.:..:..::. | .... ~ ..*~.~ ..*...... ; .K.. .*..}*..... 2000 100 : ~ :L | ||
.......*.... . | * D l00.0~ 5'5'.0~ | ||
90 ................ _ .... .. _ .......... - _:.. - or"" __ .. __; ...... _. | |||
~ | |||
~_ | |||
E 100.0" l00.o~ | |||
oo:fI Cumnt Licensed Operating 0 F ~~.~~ l00.o~ | |||
0 80 Boundazy incl1ding G ~p~ l00.o~ | |||
~ MEU.l.A Operating Domain 1500 | |||
~ H l.o.~" l00.o~ | |||
.. -:- ~ ":- . | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
10 --:- .. .. | |||
~~.~" | |||
~. ~ | |||
I 10'.0" | |||
~ * " N ' | |||
~ | |||
~1*'" | |||
~* ****1**** \ .. | |||
J 111.+" | |||
~ 60 K 100.0" 10'.0" : : Q ******* *********. J, i **.*.*. P-t | |||
~ L 100.0" ~.o" ' : | |||
Increased Core : | |||
Cil 50 ".n J | |||
P-t .-.;-----.--. --.------ -- Flow Region .:.:..:..::. .......*.... ~ . 1000 M ~l..'" | |||
~ N 10.1." ".+" Minimum Pump St:>eed 40 ~.; :..; 'G' : ':""'" | |||
0 30 . NaturalCirculation | |||
~. | |||
"-~J"" .. +. +. -+. | |||
Lo~Fwprotection J : | |||
.[ 500 L._.~: : | |||
~: | |||
B: : . .: | |||
* ff" ; . | |||
20 10 | |||
-- --- -_C - --- - _C_ ---::: _ | |||
_::::: T:-: _J::::::::r::::::::L:::::-:-::::T:--:::::::: : :-----------f ______ | |||
j ( . . * | |||
: : ~: : : . 0 o | |||
: | |||
* I o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Background (cont'd) | |||
Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+ | |||
* Improved Operational Flexibility | * Improved Operational Flexibility | ||
* Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power | * Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power | ||
Line 57: | Line 111: | ||
* Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures | * Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures | ||
* Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7 | * Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7 | ||
Overview of MELLLA+ Expands Operating Domain | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Overview of MELLLA+ | |||
Expands Operating Domain | |||
* Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow | * Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow | ||
* Changes stability solution Current stability | * Changes stability solution | ||
-Option Proposed stability solution -Detect and Suppress Solution -Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8 Regulatory Discussion | * Current stability solution | ||
* primary topical for MELLLA+ DSS-CD: topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+ | - Option III | ||
* topical supporting use for DSS-CD Methods | * Proposed stability solution | ||
- Detect and Suppress Solution - Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Regulatory Discussion LTR Compliance to Support Request | |||
* MELLLA+: primary topical for MELLLA+ | |||
* DSS-CD: topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+ | |||
* TRACG: topical supporting use for DSS-CD | |||
* Methods LTR: topical for application of GEH methods for expanded operating domains (EPU & MELLLA+) | |||
9 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd) | |||
M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals | |||
* Compliance with applicable limitations | * Compliance with applicable limitations | ||
* Taking no exceptions to | * Taking no exceptions to LTR requirements 10 | ||
* MELLLA+ SAR Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for | |||
* MELLLA+ SAR ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria | MELLLA+ | ||
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd) | |||
* MELLLA+ SAR | |||
* Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for LTR | |||
* No significant effect on: | |||
* Reactor Coolant System | |||
* Engineered Safety Features | |||
* Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems | |||
* Power Conversion Systems | |||
* Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources | |||
* Design Basis Accidents and Events 11 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd) | |||
* MELLLA+ SAR | |||
* ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria | |||
* Response to Core Instability Event acceptable | * Response to Core Instability Event acceptable | ||
* Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate Stability | * Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate | ||
* Stability | |||
* DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution | * DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution | ||
* Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12 Regulatory Discussion (cont'd) | * Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12 | ||
MELLLA+ | |||
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd) | |||
* Probabilistic Risk Assessment | * Probabilistic Risk Assessment | ||
* Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr | * Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr | ||
* Large Early Release Frequency increase of 1.62E-08/yr | * Large Early Release Frequency increase of 1.62E-08/yr | ||
* Both within Region III range of Regulatory Guide 1.174 | * Both within Region III range of Regulatory Guide 1.174 | ||
* TSTF-493 13 LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline | * TSTF-493 13 | ||
MELLLA+ | |||
LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline | |||
* Enclosure 1 | * Enclosure 1 | ||
* Standard Content | * Standard Content | ||
* Attachments to Enclosure 1 1. Technical Specification Markup 2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information | * Attachments to Enclosure 1 | ||
: 3. Re-typed TS pages 4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary | : 1. Technical Specification Markup | ||
: 5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR 6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary | : 2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information | ||
: 7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14 Proposed TS Changes | : 3. Re-typed TS pages | ||
: 4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary | |||
: 5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR | |||
: 6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary | |||
: 7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Proposed TS Changes | |||
* TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS" | * TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS" | ||
* ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability: | * ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability: | ||
* Backup Stability Protection (BSP) -Implement Manual BSP Regions AND -Implement Automated SSP -Implement Reporting Requirements | * Backup Stability Protection (BSP) | ||
* ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I: -Implement Manual SSP Regions AND -Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15 Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed -Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High -Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value -Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale -Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16 Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating" -Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain TS LCO 3.4.3, "Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs)" -Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain Update associated TS Bases 17 Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) TS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)" -Add DSS-CD requirements for the -Update analytical methods TS 5.6.5, "Reporting Requirements" -Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18 | - Implement Manual BSP Regions AND | ||
- Implement Automated SSP | |||
- Implement Reporting Requirements | |||
* ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I: | |||
- Implement Manual SSP Regions AND | |||
- Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) | |||
* TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed | |||
- Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement | |||
* TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High | |||
- Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value | |||
- Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable | |||
* TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale | |||
-Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16 | |||
MELLlA+ | |||
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) | |||
* TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating" | |||
- Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain | |||
* TS LCO 3.4.3, "Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs)" | |||
- Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain | |||
* Update associated TS Bases 17 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) | |||
* TS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)" | |||
-Add DSS-CD requirements for the COLR | |||
-Update analytical methods references | |||
* TS 5.6.5, "Reporting Requirements" | |||
-Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18 | |||
o | |||
~ | |||
o N | |||
~ | |||
CO | |||
::::J | |||
<<+ | |||
..J J C | |||
CO | |||
..J '+ | |||
..J o ~ | |||
W 0) | |||
:E +-II .0) | |||
"'C CO > | |||
0) | |||
-CO s.... | |||
..c | |||
.;::: +-II C | |||
E o | |||
..c E | |||
::::J I CJ) N | |||
~ | |||
"'C +-II | |||
: 0) CJ) | |||
CJ) 0) | |||
o ::::J C 0 O s.... 0) a.. 0:: | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Key: | |||
"Y'= Submittal | |||
=NRC Approval A = Implementation | |||
, EPU Evaluatiqn & | |||
LAR PreparatIon | |||
" I | |||
* I .. | |||
MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution NRC Review LAR Preparation EPU Escalation ~o 2004 MW C24 Refueling C25 Refueling C26 Outage Outage EPU Phase I EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons oalTlcatlons 20 | |||
MELLLA+ | |||
Conclusion | |||
* LAR complies with applicable limitations | * LAR complies with applicable limitations | ||
* LAR takes no exceptions to | * LAR takes no exceptions to LTR requirements | ||
* Proposed submittal date of January 2010 | * Proposed submittal date of January 2010 | ||
* 12-month review requested 21 | * 12-month review requested 21 | ||
-I -I -I W | |||
N N | |||
<<+ | |||
-I | |||
-I | |||
-I W | |||
~ | |||
s:: | |||
.....o CI) | |||
CI) | |||
::1 U | |||
.....CI) | |||
Q | |||
M N}} |
Latest revision as of 06:28, 12 March 2020
ML093490876 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Monticello |
Issue date: | 12/15/2009 |
From: | Gunderson L Xcel Energy |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Tam P | |
Shared Package | |
ML093451640 | List: |
References | |
TAC ME2449 | |
Download: ML093490876 (23) | |
Text
MELLLA+ LAR I I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1
MELLLA+
Attendees AI Williams Project Manager - EPU & MELLLA+
Steve Hammer Project Manager Lynne Gunderson Projects Licensing Manager Doug Blair Licensing Support Ralph Hayes Licensing Support Juswald Vedovi GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Mike Lalor GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2
MELLLA+
Agenda
- Meeting Purpose
- Background
- Overview of MELLLA+
- Regulatory Discussion
- LAR Overview
- TS Changes
- Schedule
- Discussion 3
MELLLA+
Meeting Purpose
- Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR
- Discuss Schedule
- Concurrent review with EPU 4
MELLLA+
Background
BWR Operation
- Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up
- Control Rod Movements
- Core Flow Adjustments - preferred method
- EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power
- Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power
- M+ justifies >800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5
MELLLA+
BackfJround Core Flow (% of Rated}
0 10 20 1) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 120 Power Flow 110 A 'l.n ~+.l1I>
100% CLTP = 2004 M\IIJI ..... ~ . " " .,. ~ ; , '..... . -" ..
i 100% CLTP = 1670 MWI B lO.n; ~5'.5'~ MEI.l.LA+ Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr C '5' .l1I> +~.~~ i i q
.... ~ ..*~.~ ..*...... ; .K.. .*..}*..... 2000 100 : ~ :L
- D l00.0~ 5'5'.0~
90 ................ _ .... .. _ .......... - _:.. - or"" __ .. __; ...... _.
~
~_
E 100.0" l00.o~
oo:fI Cumnt Licensed Operating 0 F ~~.~~ l00.o~
0 80 Boundazy incl1ding G ~p~ l00.o~
~ MEU.l.A Operating Domain 1500
~ H l.o.~" l00.o~
.. -:- ~ ":- .
~
~
10 --:- .. ..
~~.~"
~. ~
I 10'.0"
~ * " N '
~
~1*'"
~* ****1**** \ ..
J 111.+"
~ 60 K 100.0" 10'.0" : : Q ******* *********. J, i **.*.*. P-t
~ L 100.0" ~.o" ' :
Increased Core :
Cil 50 ".n J
P-t .-.;-----.--. --.------ -- Flow Region .:.:..:..::. .......*.... ~ . 1000 M ~l..'"
~ N 10.1." ".+" Minimum Pump St:>eed 40 ~.; :..; 'G' : ':""'"
0 30 . NaturalCirculation
~.
"-~J"" .. +. +. -+.
Lo~Fwprotection J :
.[ 500 L._.~: :
~:
B: : . .:
- ff" ; .
20 10
-- --- -_C - --- - _C_ ---::: _
_::::: T:-: _J::::::::r::::::::L:::::-:-::::T:--:::::::: : :-----------f ______
j ( . . *
- : ~: : : . 0 o
- I o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6
MELLLA+
Background (cont'd)
Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+
- Improved Operational Flexibility
- Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power
- Decrease in Rod Pattern Changes to Compensate for Fuel Burnup
- Safer Operation with Fewer Control Rod Manipulations
- Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures
- Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7
MELLLA+
Overview of MELLLA+
Expands Operating Domain
- Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow
- Changes stability solution
- Current stability solution
- Option III
- Proposed stability solution
- Detect and Suppress Solution - Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion LTR Compliance to Support Request
- MELLLA+: primary topical for MELLLA+
- DSS-CD: topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+
- TRACG: topical supporting use for DSS-CD
9
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals
- Compliance with applicable limitations
- Taking no exceptions to LTR requirements 10
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
- MELLLA+ SAR
- Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for LTR
- No significant effect on:
- Engineered Safety Features
- Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems
- Power Conversion Systems
- Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources
- Design Basis Accidents and Events 11
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
- MELLLA+ SAR
- ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria
- Response to Core Instability Event acceptable
- Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate
- Stability
- DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution
- Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
- Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr
- Large Early Release Frequency increase of 1.62E-08/yr
- Both within Region III range of Regulatory Guide 1.174
- TSTF-493 13
MELLLA+
LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline
- Enclosure 1
- Standard Content
- Attachments to Enclosure 1
- 1. Technical Specification Markup
- 2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information
- 3. Re-typed TS pages
- 4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary
- 5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR
- 6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary
- 7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes
- TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS"
- ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability:
- Backup Stability Protection (BSP)
- Implement Manual BSP Regions AND
- Implement Automated SSP
- Implement Reporting Requirements
- ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I:
- Implement Manual SSP Regions AND
- Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
- TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed
- Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement
- TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High
- Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value
- Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable
- TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale
-Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16
MELLlA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
- TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating"
- Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain
- TS LCO 3.4.3, "Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs)"
- Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain
- Update associated TS Bases 17
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
-Add DSS-CD requirements for the COLR
-Update analytical methods references
- TS 5.6.5, "Reporting Requirements"
-Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18
o
~
o N
~
CO
- J
<<+
..J J C
CO
..J '+
..J o ~
W 0)
- E +-II .0)
"'C CO >
0)
-CO s....
..c
.;::: +-II C
E o
..c E
- J I CJ) N
~
"'C +-II
- 0) CJ)
CJ) 0)
o ::::J C 0 O s.... 0) a.. 0::
MELLLA+
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Key:
"Y'= Submittal
=NRC Approval A = Implementation
, EPU Evaluatiqn &
LAR PreparatIon
" I
- I ..
MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution NRC Review LAR Preparation EPU Escalation ~o 2004 MW C24 Refueling C25 Refueling C26 Outage Outage EPU Phase I EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons oalTlcatlons 20
MELLLA+
Conclusion
- LAR complies with applicable limitations
- Proposed submittal date of January 2010
- 12-month review requested 21
N N
<<+
-I
-I
-I W
~
s::
.....o CI)
CI)
- 1 U
.....CI)
Q
M N