ML093490876: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML093490876
| number = ML093490876
| issue date = 12/15/2009
| issue date = 12/15/2009
| title = Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Meeting Slides from December 15, 2009 - Mellla+ LAR
| title = Meeting Slides from December 15, 2009 - Mellla+ LAR
| author name = Gunderson L
| author name = Gunderson L
| author affiliation = Xcel Energy
| author affiliation = Xcel Energy
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000263
| docket = 05000263
| license number = DPR-022
| license number = DPR-022
| contact person = Tam P S
| contact person = Tam P
| case reference number = TAC ME2449
| case reference number = TAC ME2449
| package number = ML093451640
| package number = ML093451640
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:MELLLA+ LAR I I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1 Attendees AI Williams Steve Hammer Lynne Gunderson Doug Blair Ralph Hayes Juswald Vedovi Mike Lalor Project Manager -EPU & MELLLA+ Project Manager Projects Licensing Manager Licensing Support Licensing Support GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2 Agenda
{{#Wiki_filter:MELLLA+ LAR I I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1
 
MELLLA+
Attendees AI Williams     Project Manager - EPU & MELLLA+
Steve Hammer    Project Manager Lynne Gunderson Projects Licensing Manager Doug Blair      Licensing Support Ralph Hayes    Licensing Support Juswald Vedovi  GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Mike Lalor      GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2
 
MELLLA+
Agenda
* Meeting Purpose
* Meeting Purpose
* Background
* Background
Line 28: Line 35:
* Schedule
* Schedule
* Discussion 3
* Discussion 3
Meeting Purpose Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR Discuss Schedule Concurrent review with EPU 4 Background BWR Operation
 
MELLLA+
Meeting Purpose
* Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR
* Discuss Schedule
* Concurrent review with EPU 4
 
MELLLA+
 
===Background===
BWR Operation
* Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up
* Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up
* Control Rod Movements
* Control Rod Movements
* Core Flow Adjustments  
* Core Flow Adjustments - preferred method
-preferred method
* EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power
* EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power
* Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power
* Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power
* M+ justifies  
* M+ justifies >800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5
>800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5 120 110 i 100 90 oo:fI 0 0 80  10  60  50 P-t  40 0 30 20 10 ------_C-----_C_---:::_ _* : : ::::: T:-:_J::::::::r::::::::
L:::::-:-:::: T:--::::::::
:::-----------f ______ o A B C D E F G H I J K L M N . NaturalCirculation
'  ...... .:
: B: : ..: *ff" ;. j (.. * :::: . 0*  I 10 Power 'l.n lO.n; '5'.l1I>
100.0" 100.0" 100.0"  10.1." 20 Flow


10'.0" 111.+" 10'.0"  ".n ".+" Core Flow (% of Rated} 1) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 1 00% CLTP = 2004 M\IIJI ..... .." " .,.  ;, '..... .. -" .. 100% CLTP = 1670 MWI MEI.l.LA+
MELLLA+
Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr .... ..*..*......; .K...*..}*.....i i q 2000 : :L * ................
BackfJround Core Flow (% of Rated}
_ .... .. _ ..........  
0              10          20              1)                       40                     50                   60         70         80         90               100               110           120 120 Power        Flow 110    A      'l.n        ~+.l1I>
-_:.. -or"" __ .. __; ...... Cumnt Licensed Boundazy MEU.l.A Operating 1500 ... -:---:-":-.. .. *" N' : : Q ******* ********.J ****1****  
100% CLTP                           = 2004 M\IIJI                   ..... ~ .   "         " .,.  ~          ;       ,             '..... .         -"       ..
\ i **.*.*. P-t*, .*, . Cil': Increased Core : .-.;-----.--.  
i 100% CLTP                           = 1670 MWI B      lO.n;      ~5'.5'~                                                                                    MEI.l.LA+ Openting Domain BoundaIy                                 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr C      '5' .l1I>  +~.~~                            i                      i                  q
--.--------Flow Region .:.:..:..::.  
                                                                                                                        .... ~ ..*~.~ ..*...... ;                                                 .K.. .*..}*..... 2000 100                                                                                                                          :   ~          :L
.......*.... . -...Minimum Pump St:>eed :..; 'G' : ':""'" J :: J:*. . ..+ + -+  
* D    l00.0~        5'5'.0~
.**-_ [ 500 o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6 Background (cont'd) Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+
90                                  ................ _ ....     .. _ .......... - _:.. - or"" __ .. __; ...... _.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ~
                                                                      ~_
E    100.0"      l00.o~
oo:fI                                      Cumnt Licensed Operating 0            F      ~~.~~    l00.o~
0      80                                  Boundazy incl1ding G      ~p~        l00.o~
  ~                                          MEU.l.A Operating Domain 1500
  ~            H      l.o.~"    l00.o~
                                              .. -:-                                     ~  ":- .
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ~
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ~
10                                                          --:-                                                   .. ..
                        ~~.~"
                                                                                                                ~.                 ~
I                10'.0"
  ~                                              *                     "                                                 N '
  ~
                        ~1*'"
                                                                                                                ~*                                                          ****1**** \ ..
J                111.+"
    ~    60    K    100.0"      10'.0"        :                    :                    Q ******* *********.                    J,                                                                      i **.*.*.           P-t
    ~            L    100.0"        ~.o"                                                                        ' :
Increased Core                                   :
Cil 50                        ".n J
P-t                                                                                                                        .-.;-----.--. --.------ -- Flow Region       .:.:..:..::. .......*.... ~              .     1000 M      ~l..'"
    ~            N      10.1."      ".+"                                                                Minimum Pump St:>eed 40                                                                                                ~.;            :..;                                             'G'               :         ':""'"
0 30  . NaturalCirculation
                                    ~.
                                            "-~J""              .. +.                      +.                -+.
Lo~Fwprotection J :
                                                                                                                                                                                                            .[          500 L._.~:                          :
                                                ~:
B:                                :                  .    .:
* ff"                  ;      .
20 10
                -- --- -_C - --- - _C_ ---::: _
_:::::      T:-: _J::::::::r::::::::L:::::-:-::::T:--:::::::: : :-----------f ______
j                (                      .      .                                                            *
:                                          : ~: : :                                                                                                      .              0 o
:
* I o           5         10           15                   20                   25                 30                 35     40       45         50       55                   60         65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6
 
MELLLA+
Background (cont'd)
Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+
* Improved Operational Flexibility
* Improved Operational Flexibility
* Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power
* Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power
Line 57: Line 111:
* Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures
* Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures
* Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7
* Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7
Overview of MELLLA+ Expands Operating Domain
 
MELLLA+
Overview of MELLLA+
Expands Operating Domain
* Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow
* Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow
* Changes stability solution Current stability  
* Changes stability solution
-Option Proposed stability solution -Detect and Suppress Solution -Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8 Regulatory Discussion L TR Compliance to Support Request
* Current stability solution
* primary topical for MELLLA+ DSS-CD: topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+
          - Option III
* topical supporting use for DSS-CD Methods L TR: topical for application of GEH methods for expanded operating domains (EPU & MELLLA+) 9 Regulatory Discussion (cont'd) M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals
* Proposed stability solution
          - Detect and Suppress Solution - Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8
 
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion LTR Compliance to Support Request
* MELLLA+:    primary topical for MELLLA+
* DSS-CD:     topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+
* TRACG:      topical supporting use for DSS-CD
* Methods LTR: topical for application of GEH methods for expanded operating domains (EPU & MELLLA+)
9
 
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals
* Compliance with applicable limitations
* Compliance with applicable limitations
* Taking no exceptions to L TR requirements 10 Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
* Taking no exceptions to LTR requirements 10
* MELLLA+ SAR Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for L TR No significant effect on: Reactor Coolant System Engineered Safety Features Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems Power Conversion Systems Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources Design Basis Accidents and Events 11 Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
 
* MELLLA+ SAR ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
* MELLLA+ SAR
* Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for LTR
* No significant effect on:
* Reactor Coolant System
* Engineered Safety Features
* Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems
* Power Conversion Systems
* Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources
* Design Basis Accidents and Events 11
 
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
* MELLLA+ SAR
* ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria
* Response to Core Instability Event acceptable
* Response to Core Instability Event acceptable
* Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate Stability
* Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate
* Stability
* DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution
* DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution
* Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12 Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
* Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12
 
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
* Probabilistic Risk Assessment
* Probabilistic Risk Assessment
* Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr
* Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr
* Large Early Release Frequency increase of 1.62E-08/yr
* Large Early Release Frequency increase of 1.62E-08/yr
* Both within Region III range of Regulatory Guide 1.174
* Both within Region III range of Regulatory Guide 1.174
* TSTF-493 13 LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline
* TSTF-493 13
 
MELLLA+
LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline
* Enclosure 1
* Enclosure 1
* Standard Content
* Standard Content
* Attachments to Enclosure 1 1. Technical Specification Markup 2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information  
* Attachments to Enclosure 1
: 3. Re-typed TS pages 4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary  
: 1. Technical Specification Markup
: 5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR 6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary  
: 2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information
: 7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14 Proposed TS Changes
: 3. Re-typed TS pages
: 4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary
: 5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR
: 6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary
: 7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14
 
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes
* TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS"
* TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS"
* ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability:
* ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability:
* Backup Stability Protection (BSP) -Implement Manual BSP Regions AND -Implement Automated SSP -Implement Reporting Requirements
* Backup Stability Protection (BSP)
* ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I: -Implement Manual SSP Regions AND -Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15 Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed -Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High -Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value -Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale -Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16 Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating" -Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain TS LCO 3.4.3, "Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs)" -Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain Update associated TS Bases 17 Proposed TS Changes (cont'd) TS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)" -Add DSS-CD requirements for the -Update analytical methods TS 5.6.5, "Reporting Requirements" -Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18
            - Implement Manual BSP Regions AND
..J ..J ..J W o o N CO ::::J C CO J 0) +-II CO -"'C CO..c ::::J CJ) "'C 0) CJ) O s.... 0)0) s.... ..c +-II C I N +-II CJ) 0) ::::J 0) 2009 2011 2008 2010 2012 , EPU Evaluatiqn  
            - Implement Automated SSP
& LAR PreparatIon " I* I.. MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution NRC Review LAR Preparation Refueling C25 Outage EPU Phase I oalTlcatlons C24 EPU Escalation  2004 MW Refueling Outage EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons Key: "Y'= Submittal
            - Implement Reporting Requirements
=NRC Approval A= Implementation C26 20 Conclusion
* ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I:
            - Implement Manual SSP Regions AND
            - Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15
 
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
* TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed
  - Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement
* TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High
  - Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value
  - Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable
* TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale
  -Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16
 
MELLlA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
* TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating"
  - Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain
* TS LCO 3.4.3, "Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs)"
  - Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain
* Update associated TS Bases 17
 
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
* TS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)"
  -Add DSS-CD requirements for the COLR
  -Update analytical methods references
* TS 5.6.5, "Reporting Requirements"
  -Add OPRM   oas reporting requirements 18
 
o
    ~
o N
    ~
CO
::::J
<<+
..J J C
CO
..J '+
..J o        ~
W      0)
:E  +-II     .0)
    "'C CO    >
0)
    -CO      s....
            ..c
    .;:::  +-II C
E        o
    ..c      E
::::J      I CJ)    N
            ~
    "'C      +-II
: 0)    CJ)
CJ) 0)
o        ::::J C    0 O s.... 0) a..      0::
 
MELLLA+
2008              2009                   2010            2011                     2012 Key:
                                                                                "Y'= Submittal
                                                                                    =NRC Approval A = Implementation
, EPU Evaluatiqn &
LAR PreparatIon
                "                     I
* I ..
MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution       NRC Review LAR Preparation EPU Escalation ~o 2004 MW C24                  Refueling           C25                     Refueling      C26 Outage                                      Outage EPU Phase I                         EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons                       oalTlcatlons 20
 
MELLLA+
Conclusion
* LAR complies with applicable limitations
* LAR complies with applicable limitations
* LAR takes no exceptions to L TR requirements
* LAR takes no exceptions to LTR requirements
* Proposed submittal date of January 2010
* Proposed submittal date of January 2010
* 12-month review requested 21
* 12-month review requested 21
-I -I -I W CI)}}
 
N N
<<+
-I
-I
-I W
~
s::
  .....o CI)
CI)
::1 U
  .....CI)
Q
 
M N}}

Latest revision as of 06:28, 12 March 2020

Meeting Slides from December 15, 2009 - Mellla+ LAR
ML093490876
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2009
From: Gunderson L
Xcel Energy
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Tam P
Shared Package
ML093451640 List:
References
TAC ME2449
Download: ML093490876 (23)


Text

MELLLA+ LAR I I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1

MELLLA+

Attendees AI Williams Project Manager - EPU & MELLLA+

Steve Hammer Project Manager Lynne Gunderson Projects Licensing Manager Doug Blair Licensing Support Ralph Hayes Licensing Support Juswald Vedovi GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Mike Lalor GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2

MELLLA+

Agenda

  • Meeting Purpose
  • Background
  • Overview of MELLLA+
  • Regulatory Discussion
  • TS Changes
  • Schedule
  • Discussion 3

MELLLA+

Meeting Purpose

  • Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR
  • Discuss Schedule
  • Concurrent review with EPU 4

MELLLA+

Background

BWR Operation

  • Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up
  • Core Flow Adjustments - preferred method
  • EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power
  • Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power
  • M+ justifies >800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5

MELLLA+

BackfJround Core Flow (% of Rated}

0 10 20 1) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 120 Power Flow 110 A 'l.n ~+.l1I>

100% CLTP = 2004 M\IIJI ..... ~ . " " .,. ~  ; , '..... . -" ..

i 100% CLTP = 1670 MWI B lO.n; ~5'.5'~ MEI.l.LA+ Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr C '5' .l1I> +~.~~ i i q

.... ~ ..*~.~ ..*...... ; .K.. .*..}*..... 2000 100  : ~ :L

  • D l00.0~ 5'5'.0~

90 ................ _ .... .. _ .......... - _:.. - or"" __ .. __; ...... _.

~

~_

E 100.0" l00.o~

oo:fI Cumnt Licensed Operating 0 F ~~.~~ l00.o~

0 80 Boundazy incl1ding G ~p~ l00.o~

~ MEU.l.A Operating Domain 1500

~ H l.o.~" l00.o~

.. -:- ~ ":- .

~

~

10 --:- .. ..

~~.~"

~. ~

I 10'.0"

~ * " N '

~

~1*'"

~* ****1**** \ ..

J 111.+"

~ 60 K 100.0" 10'.0"  :  : Q ******* *********. J, i **.*.*. P-t

~ L 100.0" ~.o" ' :

Increased Core  :

Cil 50 ".n J

P-t .-.;-----.--. --.------ -- Flow Region .:.:..:..::. .......*.... ~ . 1000 M ~l..'"

~ N 10.1." ".+" Minimum Pump St:>eed 40 ~.;  :..; 'G'  : ':""'"

0 30 . NaturalCirculation

~.

"-~J"" .. +. +. -+.

Lo~Fwprotection J :

.[ 500 L._.~:  :

~:

B:  : . .:

  • ff"  ; .

20 10

-- --- -_C - --- - _C_ ---::: _

_::::: T:-: _J::::::::r::::::::L:::::-:-::::T:--:::::::: : :-----------f ______

j ( . . *

: ~: : : . 0 o
  • I o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6

MELLLA+

Background (cont'd)

Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+

  • Improved Operational Flexibility
  • Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power
  • Decrease in Rod Pattern Changes to Compensate for Fuel Burnup
  • Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures
  • Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7

MELLLA+

Overview of MELLLA+

Expands Operating Domain

  • Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow
  • Changes stability solution
  • Current stability solution

- Option III

  • Proposed stability solution

- Detect and Suppress Solution - Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion LTR Compliance to Support Request

  • MELLLA+: primary topical for MELLLA+
  • DSS-CD: topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+
  • TRACG: topical supporting use for DSS-CD
  • Methods LTR: topical for application of GEH methods for expanded operating domains (EPU & MELLLA+)

9

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals

  • Compliance with applicable limitations
  • Taking no exceptions to LTR requirements 10

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

  • Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for LTR
  • No significant effect on:
  • Engineered Safety Features
  • Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems
  • Power Conversion Systems
  • Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources
  • Design Basis Accidents and Events 11

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

  • ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria
  • Response to Core Instability Event acceptable
  • Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate
  • Stability
  • DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution
  • Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

  • Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr

MELLLA+

LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline

  • Enclosure 1
  • Standard Content
  • Attachments to Enclosure 1
1. Technical Specification Markup
2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information
3. Re-typed TS pages
4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary
5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR
6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary
7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14

MELLLA+

Proposed TS Changes

  • ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability:
  • Backup Stability Protection (BSP)

- Implement Manual BSP Regions AND

- Implement Automated SSP

- Implement Reporting Requirements

  • ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I:

- Implement Manual SSP Regions AND

- Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15

MELLLA+

Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)

- Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement

  • TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High

- Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value

- Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable

  • TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale

-Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16

MELLlA+

Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)

  • TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating"

- Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain

- Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain

  • Update associated TS Bases 17

MELLLA+

Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)

-Add DSS-CD requirements for the COLR

-Update analytical methods references

-Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18

o

~

o N

~

CO

J

<<+

..J J C

CO

..J '+

..J o ~

W 0)

E +-II .0)

"'C CO >

0)

-CO s....

..c

.;::: +-II C

E o

..c E

J I CJ) N

~

"'C +-II

0) CJ)

CJ) 0)

o  ::::J C 0 O s.... 0) a.. 0::

MELLLA+

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Key:

"Y'= Submittal

=NRC Approval A = Implementation

, EPU Evaluatiqn &

LAR PreparatIon

" I

  • I ..

MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution NRC Review LAR Preparation EPU Escalation ~o 2004 MW C24 Refueling C25 Refueling C26 Outage Outage EPU Phase I EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons oalTlcatlons 20

MELLLA+

Conclusion

  • LAR complies with applicable limitations
  • LAR takes no exceptions to LTR requirements
  • Proposed submittal date of January 2010
  • 12-month review requested 21

N N

<<+

-I

-I

-I W

~

s::

.....o CI)

CI)

1 U

.....CI)

Q

M N