ML093490876

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meeting Slides from December 15, 2009 - Mellla+ LAR
ML093490876
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2009
From: Gunderson L
Xcel Energy
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Tam P
Shared Package
ML093451640 List:
References
TAC ME2449
Download: ML093490876 (23)


Text

MELLLA+ LAR I

I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1

MELLLA+

Attendees AI Williams Steve Hammer Lynne Gunderson Doug Blair Ralph Hayes Juswald Vedovi Mike Lalor Project Manager - EPU & MELLLA+

Project Manager Projects Licensing Manager Licensing Support Licensing Support GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2

MELLLA+

Agenda Meeting Purpose

Background

Overview of MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion LAR Overview TS Changes Schedule Discussion 3

MELLLA+

Meeting Purpose

  • Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR
  • Discuss Schedule
  • Concurrent review with EPU 4

MELLLA+

Background

BWR Operation

  • Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up
  • Core Flow Adjustments - preferred method
  • EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power
  • Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power
  • M+ justifies >800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5

MELLLA+

BackfJround 0

120 110i 100 90 oo:fI 0 0 80

~

~

10

~

~

60

~

~

50 P-t

~

40 0

30 20 10

-- --- -_C ----

-_C_ ---::: _~: _

T:-:_J::::::::r::::::::L:::::-:-::::T:--:::::::: :::-----------f ______

o A

B C

D E

F G

H I

J K

L M

N

. NaturalCirculation

~.

L._.~:

B:
  • ff" j

(..

0

~

I 10 Power

'l.n lO.n;

'5'.l1I>

l00.0~

100.0"

~~.~~

~p~

l.o.~"

~~.~"

~1*'"

100.0" 100.0"

~l..'"

10.1."

20 Flow

~+.l1I>

~5'.5'~

+~.~~

5'5'.0~

l00.o~

l00.o~

l00.o~

l00.o~

10'.0" 111.+"

10'.0"

~.o"

".n

".+"

Core Flow (% ofRated}

1) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 100% CLTP

= 2004 M\\IIJI

..... ~.."

~

100% CLTP

= 1670 MWI MEI.l.LA+ Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr.... ~..*~.~..*......;

.K...*..}*.....

i i

q 2000

~

L

................ _.... ~_.. _.......... - _:.. - or"" __.. __;

Cumnt Licensed Operating Boundazy incl1ding MEU.l.A Operating Domain

~

1500

~

., ~.

~.

~

N

~

Q ******* ~ ********.J

        • 1**** \\

i **.*.*.

P-t Cil Increased Core

.-.;-----.--. --.------ -- Flow Region

.:.:..:..::........*.... ~

. 1000 Minimum Pump St:>eed

~.;

'G'

':""'" J J :

"-~J""..+

+

-+

Lo~Fwprotection

[ 500 o

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6

MELLLA+

Background (cont'd)

Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+

  • Improved Operational Flexibility
  • Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power
  • Decrease in Rod Pattern Changes to Compensate for Fuel Burnup
  • Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures
  • Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7

MELLLA+

Overview of MELLLA+

Expands Operating Domain

  • Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow
  • Changes stability solution
  • Current stability solution Option III
  • Proposed stability solution Detect and Suppress Solution - Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion LTR Compliance to Support Request MELLLA+:

primary topical for MELLLA+

DSS-CD:

topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+

TRACG:

topical supporting use for DSS-CD Methods LTR:

topical for application of GEH methods for expanded operating domains (EPU & MELLLA+)

9

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals Compliance with applicable limitations Taking no exceptions to LTR requirements 10

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

MELLLA+ SAR

  • Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for LTR
  • No significant effect on:
  • Engineered Safety Features
  • Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems
  • Power Conversion Systems
  • Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources
  • Design Basis Accidents and Events 11

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

MELLLA+ SAR

  • ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria
  • Response to Core Instability Event acceptable
  • Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate
  • Stability
  • DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution
  • Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12

MELLLA+

Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)

Probabilistic Risk Assessment

  • Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr

MELLLA+

LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline

  • Standard Content Attachments to Enclosure 1
1. Technical Specification Markup
2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information
3. Re-typed TS pages
4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary
5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR
6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary
7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14

MELLLA+

Proposed TS Changes TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS"

  • ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability:
  • Backup Stability Protection (BSP)

- Implement Manual BSP Regions AND

- Implement Automated SSP

- Implement Reporting Requirements

  • ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I:

- Implement Manual SSP Regions AND

- Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15

MELLLA+

Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)

  • TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement
  • TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale

-Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16

MELLlA+

Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)

  • TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating"

- Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain

- Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain

  • Update associated TS Bases 17

MELLLA+

Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)

-Add DSS-CD requirements for the COLR

-Update analytical methods references

-Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18

+ <<

..J

..J

..J W

E o

o

~

N

~

CO

J C

CO J

'+o

0)

+-II CO

"'C CO

.E

..c

J CJ)

"'C

0)

CJ) o C

O s....

a..

~

0).>

0) s....

..c

+-II C o E

I N

~

+-II CJ)

0)
J 0
0) 0::

MELLLA+

2009 2011 2008 2010 2012 EPU Evaluatiqn &

LAR PreparatIon I

  • I..

MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution NRC Review LAR Preparation Refueling C25 Outage EPU Phase I oalTlcatlons C24 EPU Escalation ~o 2004 MW Refueling Outage EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons Key:

"Y'= Submittal

=NRC Approval A= Implementation C26 20

MELLLA+

Conclusion LAR complies with applicable limitations LAR takes no exceptions to LTR requirements Proposed submittal date of January 2010 12-month review requested 21

+ <<

-I

-I

-I W

~

s:: o CI)

CI)

1 U

CI)

Q N

N

M N