ML093490876
| ML093490876 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2009 |
| From: | Gunderson L Xcel Energy |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Tam P | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML093451640 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC ME2449 | |
| Download: ML093490876 (23) | |
Text
MELLLA+ LAR I
I Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant December 15, 2009 1
MELLLA+
Attendees AI Williams Steve Hammer Lynne Gunderson Doug Blair Ralph Hayes Juswald Vedovi Mike Lalor Project Manager - EPU & MELLLA+
Project Manager Projects Licensing Manager Licensing Support Licensing Support GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy 2
MELLLA+
Agenda Meeting Purpose
Background
Overview of MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion LAR Overview TS Changes Schedule Discussion 3
MELLLA+
Meeting Purpose
- Common understanding of the proposed scope of the MELLLA+ LAR
- Discuss Schedule
- Concurrent review with EPU 4
MELLLA+
Background
BWR Operation
- Maintain reactivity balance to accommodate fuel burn-up
- Control Rod Movements
- Core Flow Adjustments - preferred method
- EPU decreases available core flow window at rated power
- Without M+ >99% core flow required to operate at uprated power
- M+ justifies >800/0 core flow to operate at uprated power 5
MELLLA+
BackfJround 0
120 110i 100 90 oo:fI 0 0 80
~
~
10
~
~
60
~
~
50 P-t
~
40 0
30 20 10
-- --- -_C ----
-_C_ ---::: _~: _
- T:-:_J::::::::r::::::::L:::::-:-::::T:--:::::::: :::-----------f ______
o A
B C
D E
F G
H I
J K
L M
N
. NaturalCirculation
~.
L._.~:
- B:
- ff" j
(..
0
~
I 10 Power
'l.n lO.n;
'5'.l1I>
l00.0~
100.0"
~~.~~
~p~
l.o.~"
~~.~"
~1*'"
100.0" 100.0"
~l..'"
10.1."
20 Flow
~+.l1I>
~5'.5'~
+~.~~
5'5'.0~
l00.o~
l00.o~
l00.o~
l00.o~
10'.0" 111.+"
10'.0"
~.o"
".n
".+"
Core Flow (% ofRated}
- 1) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 100% CLTP
= 2004 M\\IIJI
..... ~.."
~
100% CLTP
= 1670 MWI MEI.l.LA+ Openting Domain BoundaIy 2004 MWt 100% Core Flow= 57.6 Mlbm/hr.... ~..*~.~..*......;
.K...*..}*.....
i i
q 2000
~
- L
................ _.... ~_.. _.......... - _:.. - or"" __.. __;
Cumnt Licensed Operating Boundazy incl1ding MEU.l.A Operating Domain
~
1500
~
., ~.
~.
~
N
~
Q ******* ~ ********.J
- 1**** \\
i **.*.*.
P-t Cil Increased Core
.-.;-----.--. --.------ -- Flow Region
.:.:..:..::........*.... ~
. 1000 Minimum Pump St:>eed
~.;
'G'
':""'" J J :
"-~J""..+
+
-+
Lo~Fwprotection
[ 500 o
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Rated Care Flow CMlbmlhr) 6
MELLLA+
Background (cont'd)
Benefits of Adopting MELLLA+
- Improved Operational Flexibility
- Increased Core Flow Range at Rated Power
- Decrease in Rod Pattern Changes to Compensate for Fuel Burnup
- Safer Operation with Fewer Control Rod Manipulations
- Minimizes likelihood of fuel failures
- Reduces the likelihood of accidents initiated by reactor maneuvers 7
MELLLA+
Overview of MELLLA+
Expands Operating Domain
- Allows operation at 2004 MWt with >80% core flow
- Changes stability solution
- Current stability solution Option III
- Proposed stability solution Detect and Suppress Solution - Confirmation Density (DSS-CD) 8
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion LTR Compliance to Support Request MELLLA+:
primary topical for MELLLA+
DSS-CD:
topical for change in stability solution required for MELLLA+
TRACG:
topical supporting use for DSS-CD Methods LTR:
topical for application of GEH methods for expanded operating domains (EPU & MELLLA+)
9
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
M+ LAR Use of Safety Evaluations for Topicals Compliance with applicable limitations Taking no exceptions to LTR requirements 10
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
MELLLA+ SAR
- Core, Fuel Performance and Thermal Limits evaluation in SAR and with core reload evaluations supporting COLR consistent with SER for LTR
- No significant effect on:
- Engineered Safety Features
- Electrical Power and Auxiliary Systems
- Power Conversion Systems
- Radwaste Systems and Radiation Sources
- Design Basis Accidents and Events 11
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
MELLLA+ SAR
- ATWS Event Evaluated with Significant Margin to acceptance criteria
- Response to Core Instability Event acceptable
- Monticello EOP actions effectively mitigate
- Stability
- DSS-CD would replace Option III as stability solution
- Automated Backup Stability Protection (SSP) would provide backup solution 12
MELLLA+
Regulatory Discussion (cont'd)
- Core Damage Frequency increase of 7.36E-08/yr
- Large Early Release Frequency increase of 1.62E-08/yr
- Both within Region III range of Regulatory Guide 1.174 TSTF-493 13
MELLLA+
LAR Overview License Amendment Request Outline
- Standard Content Attachments to Enclosure 1
- 1. Technical Specification Markup
- 2. Technical Specification Bases Mark-up for information
- 3. Re-typed TS pages
- 4. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Proprietary
- 5. Affidavit supporting proprietary M+SAR
- 6. MELLLA+ Safety Analysis Report (M+SAR) Non-Proprietary
- 7. Monticello MELLLA+ Risk Assessment 14
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes TS 3.3.1.1, "RPS Instrumentation ACTIONS"
- ACTION I Addresses OPRM Inoperability:
- Backup Stability Protection (BSP)
- Implement Manual BSP Regions AND
- Implement Automated SSP
- Implement Reporting Requirements
- ACTION J Addresses inability to Implement ACTION I:
- Implement Manual SSP Regions AND
- Reduce Operation to below the BSP Boundary 15
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
- TS SR 3.3.1.1.16 OPRM not bypassed Delete unnecessary surveillance requirement
- TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 APRM STP-High Change APRM STP Function 2.b Allowable Value Add note (d) for OPRM Function 2.f inoperable
- TS Table 3.3.1.1-1 OPRM Upscale
-Add note (h) for OPRM Function 2.f implementation 16
MELLlA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
- TS LCO 3.4.1, "Recirculation Loops Operating"
- Prohibit SLO in M+ Domain
- TS LCO 3.4.3, "Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs)"
- Restrict number of inoperable S/RV in M+ Domain
- Update associated TS Bases 17
MELLLA+
Proposed TS Changes (cont'd)
-Add DSS-CD requirements for the COLR
-Update analytical methods references
- TS 5.6.5, "Reporting Requirements"
-Add OPRM oas reporting requirements 18
+ <<
..J
..J
..J W
- E o
o
~
N
~
CO
- J C
CO J
'+o
- 0)
+-II CO
"'C CO
.E
..c
- J CJ)
"'C
- 0)
CJ) o C
O s....
a..
~
0).>
- 0) s....
..c
+-II C o E
I N
~
+-II CJ)
- 0)
- J 0
- 0) 0::
MELLLA+
2009 2011 2008 2010 2012 EPU Evaluatiqn &
LAR PreparatIon I
- I..
MELLLA+/ DSS-CD Stability Solution NRC Review LAR Preparation Refueling C25 Outage EPU Phase I oalTlcatlons C24 EPU Escalation ~o 2004 MW Refueling Outage EPU Phase II oalTlcatlons Key:
"Y'= Submittal
=NRC Approval A= Implementation C26 20
MELLLA+
Conclusion LAR complies with applicable limitations LAR takes no exceptions to LTR requirements Proposed submittal date of January 2010 12-month review requested 21
+ <<
-I
-I
-I W
~
s:: o CI)
CI)
- 1 U
CI)
Q N
N
M N