ML091250582

Meeting Slides, Monticello, Preparation & Assessment for Hostile Action-based Drill.

ML091250582
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	05/05/2009
From:	Pedersen D Xcel Energy
To:	Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
McCoppin, Michael NSIR/DPR 415-2737
References
Download: ML091250582 (10)

Text

PREPARATION & ASSESSMENT for Hostile Action-Based Drill Don Pedersen Manager Emergency Preparedness, Monticello Plant

PLAN External and Internal Assessment Team Membership Tools: Plan and Checklist NEI 06-04, Appendices A and C RIS 2008-08 endorsement clarifications Current Industry Lessons Learned Timing prior to the Table Top and Drill 2

CHECKLIST Checklist Number: 1 NEI 06-04 Appendix A, Required Functional Demonstrations.

Objective: Evaluate site readiness.

Item Self-Assessment Element Method Performer 1 Review applicable documents to evaluate the sites ability to Document ________

Demonstrate the ability to implement the emergency plan Review during a hostile action-based event.

Evidence:

Recommendations:

2 Review applicable documents to evaluate the sites ability to Document ________

Demonstrate the ability to make initial notifications to law Review enforcement and other first responder agencies during a hostile action-based event.

Evidence:

Recommendations:

3 Review applicable documents to evaluate the sites ability to Document ________

Demonstrate the ability to make accelerated NRC notifications. Review Evidence:

Recommendations:

3

PERFORM One week comprehensive effort Assess the readiness of each item Factually report readiness Capture follow-up recommendations and actions 4

RESPOND Identify, prioritize, and assign ownership of each action on spreadsheets Immediately update the spreadsheets with the new actions Track progress as often as daily Keep the spreadsheets current 5

BENEFITS Confirmation of benefits from actions taken Communications matrix identified equipment and facilities Extent of Play document enabled understanding and success On-site and off-site scenario development teams Combined annual fire and medical drills 6

COMMUNICATIONS CHART 7

EXTENT OF PLAY Contact Person 12/3/2008 10/22/2008 Confirmed Completion Agency For Hostile Action Full Scale Drill Tabletop Extent of Play Participation and/or Dept. Based Drill Participation Participation Extent of Play MNGP Site Charles Dixon Full Participation Decision Makers Full Participation as in a normal REP exercise Yes Controllers Charles Dixon Controllers Identified for all locations on-site including I.C. and JIC Yes On-Site Package Gerrald Holthaus On-Site Package Developed as normal REP Exercise Yes TSC Gerry Holthaus Yes Yes Full TSC Participation for Dec. 3, 2008 Yes OSC Gerry Holthaus Yes Yes Full OSC Participation for Dec. 3, 2008 Yes EOF Gerry Holthaus Yes Yes Full EOF Participation for Dec. 3, 2008 Yes Security Chad Geiser Yes Yes Full Security Participation for Dec. 3, 2008 Yes JIC Ed Weinkam Yes Yes Representation at JIC and Scene as necessary Yes Xcel Corp Ed Weinkam Yes Yes Representation at JIC/EOF Yes NEI 06-04 Rev. 1 Appendix A Demonstrate the ability to implement the e-plan during a HAB event.

Demstrate the ability to make initial notifications to law enforcement and other first responder agencies during a HAB.

Demonstrate the ability to make accelerated NRC notifications.

Demonstrate the ability of on-shift Ops and Security personnel to coordinate response actions among themselves, the ICS and with LLEA.

Demonstrate the ability of Ops and Sec personnel to coord. responses by on- and off-shift 1st resp. after the threat is neatralized and prior to act. of ERO facilities.

Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the ERO in a timely manner following threat neutraziation.

Demonstrate the ability of the site and the ERO to support activation and operation of an ICP.

Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to coordinate in-plant and on-site response actions with security and the ICP.

Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to activate alternate facilities (if required by the scenario).

Demonstrate the ability to coordinate and conduct fire and medical responses in the field.

Demonstrate the ability to account for on-site personnel once the threat is neatralized.

Demonstrate radiation protection measures for offsite responders.

Demonstrate the ability to perform an assessment of off-site radiological consequences from a projected release.

Domonstrate the ability to assess the impact of the attack on the security plan, and to identify and implement compensatory measures if needed.

Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to coordinate the development and release of public information with the ICP.

8

BENEFITS Independent identification of potentially unsuccessful items Avoid repeating industry weaknesses Reprioritization opportunity Add assistance, if needed The Assessment helped drive TIMELINESS and SUCCESS 9

Donald E. Pedersen Manager of Emergency Preparedness Monticello Nuclear Generating Station 763.295.1617 Donald.pedersen@xenuclear.com