ML19207B168: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 12
| page count = 12
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-,.BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NU LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
{{#Wiki_filter:-
: Docket Nos. 50-277
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NU LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of                 :   Docket Nos. 50-277 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY     :               50-278 APPLICATION FOR AFENDMENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-44 and DPR-56 Edward G. Bauer, Jr.
: PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
Eugene J. Bradley 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 A t torneys for Philadelphia Electric Company 786010
: 50-278 APPLICATION FOR AFENDMENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-44 and DPR-56 Edward G.Bauer, Jr.
                                          ?908239ygg
Eugene J.Bradley 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 A t torneys for Philadelphia Electric Company 786010?908239ygg
 
.
BEFORE Tile UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of                     :   Docket Nos. 50-277 PilILADELPillA ELECTRIC COMPANY       :               50-278 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-44 and DPR-56 Philadelphia Electric Company, Licensee under Facility Operating Licenses DPR-44 and DPR-56 for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 respectively, hereby requests tha t the Environmental Technical Specifications incorporated in Appendix B of the Operating Licenses be amended by deleting Section 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.3.a as indicated by the attached revised pages 14, 15 through 33 and 40.
.., BEFORE Tile
Since initial operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 in 1974, extensive studies of fisheries, limnology and thermal e f fec t s in the Conowingo Pond have been conducted in accordance 98G011
*UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
 
: Docket Nos. 50-277
with the technical specification requirements of these Sections
: PilILADELPillA ELECTRIC COMPANY
  . of *'e Peach Bottom Environmental Technical Specifications.       The resu' ts of the various studies have been re orted in the Semi-Annual Post-Operational Reports on the Ecology of Conowingo Pond up to and including Post-Operational Report No. 11, dated >brch, 19791! . The prin.ary purpose of the ecological studies required by the Technical Specifications was to identify any significant adverse impact on the ccology of Conowingo Pond resulting from the operation of the Peach Bottom units, with particular e.aphasis on the possible adverse impacts of chemical and thermal dischargs to the Pond. A comparison of the results reported in the various ost-operational monitoring reports with data collected since 1966, prior to operation of Peach Bottom units, shows that opera-tion of the Peach Bottom uni.ts has had no adverse effect on che ecology of Conowingo Pond.
: 50-278 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-44 and DPR-56 Philadelphia Electric Company, Licensee under Facility Operating Licenses DPR-44 and DPR-56 for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 respectively, hereby requests tha t the Environmental Technical Specifications incorporated in Appendix B of the Operating Licenses be amended by deleting Section 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.3.a as indicated by the attached revised pages 14, 15 through 33 and 40.
Since initial operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 in 1974, extensive studies of fisheries, limnology and thermal e f fec t s in the Conowingo Pond have been conducted in accordance 98G011 ,
, with the technical specification requirements of these Sections of*'e Peach Bottom Environmental Technical Specifications.
The.resu' ts of the various studies have been re orted in the Semi-Annual Post-Operational Reports on the Ecology of Conowingo Pond up to and including Post-Operational Report No. 11, dated >brch, 1!The prin.ary purpose of the ecological studies required 1979.by the Technical Specifications was to identify any significant adverse impact on the ccology of Conowingo Pond resulting from the operation of the Peach Bottom units, with particular e.aphasis on the possible adverse impacts of chemical and thermal dischargs to the Pond.
A comparison of the results reported in the various ost-operational monitoring reports with data collected since 1966, prior to operation of Peach Bottom units, shows that opera-tion of the Peach Bottom uni.ts has had no adverse effect on che ecology of Conowingo Pond.
The five-year post-operational monitoring and analytical program conducted at Peach Bottom has revealed the following facts concerning the impact of the operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 on Conowingo Pond:
The five-year post-operational monitoring and analytical program conducted at Peach Bottom has revealed the following facts concerning the impact of the operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 on Conowingo Pond:
1.No significant differences attributable to plant operations in total chlorophyl"a" concentrations were noted either at the surface or within the water column among the 1/See also "A Critical Evaluation of Non-Radiological Environmental Specifications, Volume 3, Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3," preparcd by Oak Ridge National Laboratories. 78' 012 o.
: 1. No significant differences attributable to plant operations in total chlorophyl   "a" concentrations were noted either at the surface or within the water column among the 1/ See also "A Critical Evaluation of Non-Radiological Environmental Specifications, Volume 3, Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3," preparcd by Oak Ridge National Laboratories.
..different monitoring stations in the Pond; nor were there any significant differences in chlorophyl"a" concentrations noted
78'o012
*between pre-operational and post-operational periods.
 
2.No significant differences attributable to plant operation were observed in zooplankton densities among the monitoring stations in the Pond; nor were there any significant differences nor'd between pua-operational and post-operational periods.
different monitoring stations in the Pond; nor were there any significant differences in chlorophyl   "a" concentrations noted between pre-operational and post-operational periods.
Fluctuations in zooplankton densities appear to be attributable to natural variations, and to some extent to predation by a strong year class of gizzard shad which had been accidentally introduced into the Pond in 1972.
: 2. No significant differences attributable to plant operation were observed in zooplankton densities among the monitoring stations in the Pond; nor were there any significant differences nor'd between pua-operational and post-operational periods. Fluctuations in zooplankton densities appear to be attributable to natural variations, and to some extent to predation by a strong year class of gizzard shad which had been accidentally introduced into the Pond in 1972.
3.No significant differences were observed in biomass and species composition of benthos in Conowingo Pond during pre-operational and operational periods.
: 3. No significant differences were observed in biomass and species composition of benthos in Conowingo Pond during pre-operational and operational periods. Variations in the standing crop appeared to be attributable to natural variation.
Variations in the standing crop appeared to be attributable to natural variation.
: 4. There is no evidence of a reduction in the fish population caused by impingement, because small numbers of fishes were impinged. Impingement appears to be influenced primarily by river flow. Other factors having a small influence include pond elevat.on, season, and specific characteristics of the species.
4.There is no evidence of a reduction in the fish population caused by impingement, because small numbers of fishes were impinged.
786013
Impingement appears to be influenced primarily by river flow.
: 5. Since the plant has no effect on zooplankton densities, the effects of entrainment are considered minimal.
Other factors having a small influence include pond elevat.on, season, and specific characteristics of the species.- 3-786013.
The loss of adult fishes through entrainment of larvae is insignificant when compared with the exploitation rate of anglers.
.5.Since the plant has no effect on zooplankton
: 6. No winter fish kills were observed due to nlant operation even though numerous unit shutdowns have occurred.
-densities, the effects of entrainment are considered minimal.
The loss of adult fishes through entrainment of larvae is insignificant when compared with the exploitation rate of anglers.6.No winter fish kills were observed due to nlant operation even though numerous unit shutdowns have occurred.
The facters that assure the protection of fishes in Conowingo Pond in relativa to the dischcrge of the plant are the preference and avoidance behavioral responses of the fishes which cause the fish to select or reject specific temperatures.
The facters that assure the protection of fishes in Conowingo Pond in relativa to the dischcrge of the plant are the preference and avoidance behavioral responses of the fishes which cause the fish to select or reject specific temperatures.
Routine power plant operation procedure also minimizes the rate of change in the plant discharge temperature.
Routine power plant operation procedure also minimizes the rate of change in the plant discharge temperature.
Based upon the foregoing, Licensee has concluded that the. post-operational studies conducted pursuant to Technical Specificatienc 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.3.a have confirmed that the operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 to date has not had any adverse impact on the ecology of Conowingo Pond and that continued operation of the units will not have any such impact in the future.
Based upon the foregoing, Licensee has concluded that the. post-operational studies conducted pursuant to Technical Specificatienc 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.3.a have confirmed that the operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 to date has not had any adverse impact on the ecology of Conowingo Pond and that continued operation of the units will not have any such impact in the future. Analysis of the post-operational monitoring data demonstrate that Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 operations, including thermal cischarges, are not having adverse effects on primary producers, zooplankton, or benthos.
Analysis of the post-operational monitoring data demonstrate that Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 operations, including thermal cischarges, are not having adverse effects on primary producers, zooplankton, or benthos. 786G14  
786G14
.Although fish population densities in the discharge area have varied with species, these variations are attributable to
 
, natural causes rather than plant operations.
Although fish population densities in the discharge area have varied with species, these variations are attributable to natural causes rather than plant operations.     It should be noted that all thermal effcets prior to November, 1977, reflect operations with no more than three cooling towers.     In November, 1977, Licensee placed in service two additional cooling towers. The availability of this additional cooling capacity during critical periods will assure further reductiins in thermal discharges to the Pond.
It should be noted that all thermal effcets prior to November, 1977, reflect operations with no more than three cooling towers.
In November, 1977, Licensee placed in service two additional cooling towers.
The availability of this additional cooling capacity during critical periods will assure further reductiins in thermal discharges to the Pond.
Accordingly, since the objectives of Technical Specification Sections 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.1.a have been met and further studies are not necessary to evaluate the impacts of plant operations on Conowingo Pond, Licensee requests that these Sections and their associated Bases be deleted from the Environmencal Technical Specifications.
Accordingly, since the objectives of Technical Specification Sections 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.1.a have been met and further studies are not necessary to evaluate the impacts of plant operations on Conowingo Pond, Licensee requests that these Sections and their associated Bases be deleted from the Environmencal Technical Specifications.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 " Schedule of Fees for Facility License Amendment," Philadelphia Electric Company proposes that this Application for Amendment be considered a Class III Amendment for Unit 2 and a Class I for Unit 3 since the proposed changes involved a single environmental issue which does not involve a significunt environmental hazard.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 " Schedule of Fees for Facility License Amendment," Philadelphia Electric Company proposes that this Application for Amendment be considered a Class III Amendment for Unit 2 and a Class I for Unit 3     since the proposed changes involved a single environmental issue which does not involve a significunt environmental hazard.
The Plant Operation Review Con aictee and the Operation and Safety Review Committee have reviewed these 166015.
The Plant Operation Review Con aictee and the Operation and Safety Review Committee have reviewed these 166015
.proposed changes to the Environuental Technical Specifications
 
.and have concluded that these deletions do not involve a hnzard consideration, will not end.inger the health and safety of the public, and will not have a harmful environmental effect.
proposed changes to the Environuental Technical Specifications and have concluded that these deletions do not involve a hnzard consideration, will not end.inger the health and safety of the public, and will not have a harmful environmental effect.
Respectfully submitted, PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
Respectfully submitted, PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
-..'#"'Vice (Presid/t/t
                                                  'Vice (Presid/t/t 786016 O
.-6-786016.O  
 
.COMMONWEALTII 0F PENNSYLVANIA
COMMONWEALTII 0F PENNSYLVANIA                   :
:.s.COUNTY OF Fili L AD EL PIII A
                                                        .s.
:.S.L.Daltroff, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
COUNTY OF Fili L AD EL PIII A                   :
S. L. Daltroff, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he is Vice President of Philadelphia Electric Company, the Applicant herein; that he has read the foregoing Application for Amendment of Facility Operating Licenses and knows the con c.nts there of ; and that the s c a t. e m e n t s and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of nis knowledge, information and belief.
That he is Vice President of Philadelphia Electric Company, the Applicant herein; that he has read the foregoing Application for Amendment of Facility Operating Licenses and knows the con c.nts there of ; and that the s c a t. e m e n t s and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of nis knowledge, information and belief.
_/'' l ,(8$',-1I Subscribed and sworn to before me this l" day'of/(A dN.WL-d.3 cit ry Pub'i[tu 7eEm H e vW}
                                                              /'
Nat.v potir ru: rn a co,-I -.iU bewfi C7f J S van, gG,172 y 785017.
                                                            ' l ,(
...CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that service of the foregoing Application was made upon the Board of Supervisors, Peach Bottom Township, York County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-class mail, to Albert R.
8$   ,
Steele, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, R.D. No.1, Delta, Pennsylvania 17314; upon the Board of Supervisors, Fulton Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-c lass mail, to George K.
1I Subscribed and sworn to before me this               l"     day of
Brinton, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors , Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania 17563; and upon the Board of Super-visors, Drumore Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-class mail, to Wilmer P.
                /
Bolton, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors , R.
(
D. No.1, Holtwood, Pennsylvania 17532; all this 20th day of August 1979., ,f>--h-Evggde J.Bra dley Atto rney for Philadelphia Elec tric Company 786018  
  .      A d dN.               WL-3 cit     ry Pub'i[
..PBAPS.6.0 Environmental Surveillance and Speci al Study Programs Studies described in this section will be terminated upon agreement by Philadelphia Electric Company and t'ie Nucicar Regulatory Commission that the intended purpose of the study has been satisfied.
tu 7eEm H e vW}
6.1_ Aquatic 6.1.a This Section has been deleted.- 14 -786019..
Nat.v potir ru: rn a co, Iy -   .iU bewfi C7f J S van, gG,172 785017
*. . ....PBAPS.Pages 15 through 33 LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 786020  
 
.7. . .-n PBAPS.collected data will be reviewed and those metal concentrations which are shown not to be significantly affected by plant operation will be eliminated from the program.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that service of the foregoing Application was made upon the Board of Supervisors, Peach Bottom Township, York County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-class mail, to Albert R. Steele, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, R. D. No. 1, Delta, Pennsylvania 17314; upon the Board of Supervisors, Fulton Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-c lass mail, to George K. Brinton, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors ,
Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania 17563; and upon the Board of Super-visors, Drumore Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-class mail, to Wilmer P.     Bolton, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors , R. D. No. 1, Holtwood, Pennsylvania   17532; all this 20th day of     August   , 1979.
                                      >--             ,f h-     Evggde J. Bra dley Atto rney for Philadelphia Elec tric Company 786018
 
PBAPS 6.0     Environmental Surveillance and Speci al Study Programs Studies described in this section will be terminated upon agreement by Philadelphia Electric Company and t'ie Nucicar Regulatory Commission that the intended purpose of the study has been satisfied.
6.1    _ Aquatic 6.1.a   This Section has been deleted.
786019
 
PBAPS Pages 15 through 33 LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 786020
 
. . .   .             7
      -     n PBAPS collected data will be reviewed and those metal concentrations which are shown not to be significantly affected by plant operation will be eliminated from the program.
Bases This study will provide information as to the degree and nature of heavy metal pick-up in the PBAPS circulating water system.
Bases This study will provide information as to the degree and nature of heavy metal pick-up in the PBAPS circulating water system.
Data f rom this study will be repor ted as per Section 7.4.
Data f rom this study will be repor ted as per Section 7.4.
6.3 Physical 6.3.a This section has been deleted.- 40 -78G021}}
6.3       Physical 6.3.a     This section has been deleted.
78G021}}

Latest revision as of 06:23, 2 February 2020

Application for Amend of Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19207B168
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/23/1979
From: Bauer E, Bradley E
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
Shared Package
ML19207B165 List:
References
NUDOCS 7908230482
Download: ML19207B168 (12)
v • d • e


Text

-

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NU LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of  : Docket Nos. 50-277 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY  : 50-278 APPLICATION FOR AFENDMENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-44 and DPR-56 Edward G. Bauer, Jr.

Eugene J. Bradley 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 A t torneys for Philadelphia Electric Company 786010

?908239ygg

BEFORE Tile UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of  : Docket Nos. 50-277 PilILADELPillA ELECTRIC COMPANY  : 50-278 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-44 and DPR-56 Philadelphia Electric Company, Licensee under Facility Operating Licenses DPR-44 and DPR-56 for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 respectively, hereby requests tha t the Environmental Technical Specifications incorporated in Appendix B of the Operating Licenses be amended by deleting Section 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.3.a as indicated by the attached revised pages 14, 15 through 33 and 40.

Since initial operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 in 1974, extensive studies of fisheries, limnology and thermal e f fec t s in the Conowingo Pond have been conducted in accordance 98G011

with the technical specification requirements of these Sections

. of *'e Peach Bottom Environmental Technical Specifications. The resu' ts of the various studies have been re orted in the Semi-Annual Post-Operational Reports on the Ecology of Conowingo Pond up to and including Post-Operational Report No. 11, dated >brch, 19791! . The prin.ary purpose of the ecological studies required by the Technical Specifications was to identify any significant adverse impact on the ccology of Conowingo Pond resulting from the operation of the Peach Bottom units, with particular e.aphasis on the possible adverse impacts of chemical and thermal dischargs to the Pond. A comparison of the results reported in the various ost-operational monitoring reports with data collected since 1966, prior to operation of Peach Bottom units, shows that opera-tion of the Peach Bottom uni.ts has had no adverse effect on che ecology of Conowingo Pond.

The five-year post-operational monitoring and analytical program conducted at Peach Bottom has revealed the following facts concerning the impact of the operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 on Conowingo Pond:

1. No significant differences attributable to plant operations in total chlorophyl "a" concentrations were noted either at the surface or within the water column among the 1/ See also "A Critical Evaluation of Non-Radiological Environmental Specifications, Volume 3, Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3," preparcd by Oak Ridge National Laboratories.

78'o012

different monitoring stations in the Pond; nor were there any significant differences in chlorophyl "a" concentrations noted between pre-operational and post-operational periods.

2. No significant differences attributable to plant operation were observed in zooplankton densities among the monitoring stations in the Pond; nor were there any significant differences nor'd between pua-operational and post-operational periods. Fluctuations in zooplankton densities appear to be attributable to natural variations, and to some extent to predation by a strong year class of gizzard shad which had been accidentally introduced into the Pond in 1972.
3. No significant differences were observed in biomass and species composition of benthos in Conowingo Pond during pre-operational and operational periods. Variations in the standing crop appeared to be attributable to natural variation.
4. There is no evidence of a reduction in the fish population caused by impingement, because small numbers of fishes were impinged. Impingement appears to be influenced primarily by river flow. Other factors having a small influence include pond elevat.on, season, and specific characteristics of the species.

786013

5. Since the plant has no effect on zooplankton densities, the effects of entrainment are considered minimal.

The loss of adult fishes through entrainment of larvae is insignificant when compared with the exploitation rate of anglers.

6. No winter fish kills were observed due to nlant operation even though numerous unit shutdowns have occurred.

The facters that assure the protection of fishes in Conowingo Pond in relativa to the dischcrge of the plant are the preference and avoidance behavioral responses of the fishes which cause the fish to select or reject specific temperatures.

Routine power plant operation procedure also minimizes the rate of change in the plant discharge temperature.

Based upon the foregoing, Licensee has concluded that the. post-operational studies conducted pursuant to Technical Specificatienc 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.3.a have confirmed that the operation of Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 to date has not had any adverse impact on the ecology of Conowingo Pond and that continued operation of the units will not have any such impact in the future. Analysis of the post-operational monitoring data demonstrate that Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 operations, including thermal cischarges, are not having adverse effects on primary producers, zooplankton, or benthos.

786G14

Although fish population densities in the discharge area have varied with species, these variations are attributable to natural causes rather than plant operations. It should be noted that all thermal effcets prior to November, 1977, reflect operations with no more than three cooling towers. In November, 1977, Licensee placed in service two additional cooling towers. The availability of this additional cooling capacity during critical periods will assure further reductiins in thermal discharges to the Pond.

Accordingly, since the objectives of Technical Specification Sections 6.1.a.1, 6.1.a.2, and 6.1.a have been met and further studies are not necessary to evaluate the impacts of plant operations on Conowingo Pond, Licensee requests that these Sections and their associated Bases be deleted from the Environmencal Technical Specifications.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 " Schedule of Fees for Facility License Amendment," Philadelphia Electric Company proposes that this Application for Amendment be considered a Class III Amendment for Unit 2 and a Class I for Unit 3 since the proposed changes involved a single environmental issue which does not involve a significunt environmental hazard.

The Plant Operation Review Con aictee and the Operation and Safety Review Committee have reviewed these 166015

proposed changes to the Environuental Technical Specifications and have concluded that these deletions do not involve a hnzard consideration, will not end.inger the health and safety of the public, and will not have a harmful environmental effect.

Respectfully submitted, PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY

'Vice (Presid/t/t 786016 O

COMMONWEALTII 0F PENNSYLVANIA  :

.s.

COUNTY OF Fili L AD EL PIII A  :

S. L. Daltroff, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Vice President of Philadelphia Electric Company, the Applicant herein; that he has read the foregoing Application for Amendment of Facility Operating Licenses and knows the con c.nts there of ; and that the s c a t. e m e n t s and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of nis knowledge, information and belief.

/'

' l ,(

8$ ,

1I Subscribed and sworn to before me this l" day of

/

(

. A d dN. WL-3 cit ry Pub'i[

tu 7eEm H e vW}

Nat.v potir ru: rn a co, Iy - .iU bewfi C7f J S van, gG,172 785017

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that service of the foregoing Application was made upon the Board of Supervisors, Peach Bottom Township, York County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-class mail, to Albert R. Steele, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, R. D. No. 1, Delta, Pennsylvania 17314; upon the Board of Supervisors, Fulton Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-c lass mail, to George K. Brinton, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors ,

Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania 17563; and upon the Board of Super-visors, Drumore Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, by mailing a copy thereof, via first-class mail, to Wilmer P. Bolton, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors , R. D. No. 1, Holtwood, Pennsylvania 17532; all this 20th day of August , 1979.

>-- ,f h- Evggde J. Bra dley Atto rney for Philadelphia Elec tric Company 786018

PBAPS 6.0 Environmental Surveillance and Speci al Study Programs Studies described in this section will be terminated upon agreement by Philadelphia Electric Company and t'ie Nucicar Regulatory Commission that the intended purpose of the study has been satisfied.

6.1 _ Aquatic 6.1.a This Section has been deleted.

786019

PBAPS Pages 15 through 33 LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 786020

. . . . 7

- n PBAPS collected data will be reviewed and those metal concentrations which are shown not to be significantly affected by plant operation will be eliminated from the program.

Bases This study will provide information as to the degree and nature of heavy metal pick-up in the PBAPS circulating water system.

Data f rom this study will be repor ted as per Section 7.4.

6.3 Physical 6.3.a This section has been deleted.

78G021

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19207B168&oldid=2392805"