ML20092B936

Rev E to TS Change Request (Tscr) 93-16 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56 Re Implementation of Improved Ts.Rev E to Tscr 93-16 Redesignates Change Control Mechanism from 10CFR50.59,as Indicated Previously,To 10CFR50.54(a) for Six Listed Items

ML20092B936
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	08/28/1995
From:	Hunger G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20092B941	List: ML20092B936 ML20092B987
References
NUDOCS 9509120188
Download: ML20092B936 (3)

Text

. , . . - - -. - - - . . .. - . . . - - .,

7, y .- etetson support popzrtment

.e4 10CFR50.90 L v c PECO ENERGY Of J:'#'"aL.

965 Chesterbrook Boulevard Wayne, PA 19087-5691 i

- August 28,1995 p

i -l

Docket Nos. 50-277

^

50-278 License Noe DPR-44 DPR-56 i.*

t U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555  ;

i I

SUBJECT:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3  ;

Revision E to TSCR 93-16 Implementation of the improved Technical Specifications.  ;

REFERENCE:

1) Letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) dated September 29,1994

2) Letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to USNRC, dated .

March 3,1995

3) Letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to USNRC, dated

• August 4,1995

4) Letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to USNRC, dated August 11,1995

Dear Sir:

In the above reference letter 1, PECO Energy transmitted Technical Specifications Change i Request (TSCR) 93-16 for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3. This TSCR proposed an overall conversion from the PBAPS existing custom Technical Specifications

. to the Improved Technical Specifications (ITS) as contained in NUREG 1433, " Standard Technical Specifications General Electric Plants, BWR/4."

i As part of the overall conversion, PECO Energy is relocating many of the current Technical ,

' Specification (CTS) requirements'to various plant procedures or the Technical Requirements  :

- Manual. These requirements are or will be incorporated by reference into the UFSAR such that changes to them will be subject to the requirements of 10CFR50.59. PECO Energy will maintain  ;

an auditable record of changes to these provisions.

f

" O n es * .

9509120198 950828 Lv PDR. ADOCK 05000277. g

_P_ _ ___ _ ._._P_DR_ _ .

f $ o '.  ;

.. August 28,1995 Page 2 l In the above reference letter 2, PECO Energy submitted a matrix of relocated items. The

purpose of this matrix is to indicate the change control mechanism (e.g.,10CFR50.59, 10CFR50.54(a)) which will be used to evaluate future changes to the items relocated out of CTS.

PECO Energy proposes to redesignate the change control mechanism from 10CFR50.59, as indicated previously, to 10CFR50.54(a) for the following six items: 1) the review and audit

functions of the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC, CTS 6.5.1),2) the review and audit ,

function of the Nuclear Review Board (NRB, CTS 6.5.2),3) the requirement for PORC and NRB i to review Reportable Event Reports (CTS 6.6.1.b),4) the requirement for written procedures that meet the requirements of Section 5.1 and 5.3 of the ANSI N18.7-1972 (CTS 6.8.1.a),5) the i

! requirement for procedures that cover QA for environmental monitoring to use the guidance of j Regulatory Guide 4.1 (CTS 6.8.1.c), and 6) the requirement for Fire Protection inspections (CTS i 6.12.)

4 in the above reference letter 3, PECO Energy proposed the approach that would be used to 4 implement new and revised Surveillance Requirements (SRs). An auditable record of, and an implementation schedule for the procedure changes associated with the development of the ITS will be maintained. In addition, PECO Energy wHI maintain the documentation of these changes in accordance with the record retention requirements in the QA plan. '

! In the above reference letter 4, PECO Energy submitted the final TS pages for ITS, and +

j discussed a technical issue regarding the volume of fuel oil in the Emergency Diesel Generator  ;

j (EDG) storage and days tanks. PECO Energy has reviewed this issue and has revised the appropriate pages of the ITS. The revised pages constitute Revision E to TSCR 93-16, and are included as an Attachment to this letter. Also included in the Revision E is a proposed change to a Note to a Surveillance Requirement in the primary containment isolation valve section of ITS. PECO Energy has determined that this revision does not alter our evaluation of any of the 10CFR50.59 standards, and therefore, does not affect our conclusion that this revision to TSCR

{ 93-16 does not constitute an unreviewed safety question. We have determined that the ,

proposed revision does not affect the conclusion of the No Significant Hazards Considerations or the Environmental Assessment.

j If you have any questions, please contact us.

i i Very truly yours, t

G. A. Hunger, Jr.f ,

Director - Licensing Affidavit j Attachment cc: T. T. Martin, Administrator, Region I, USNRC W. L Schmidt, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, PBAPS R. R. Janati, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania i

i i

, c .

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA  :  ;

ss.

COUNTY OF CHESTER  :

W. H. Smith, lil being first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Vice President of PECO Energy Company; the Applicant herein; that he has read the attached letter regarding TSCR 93-13 for the Peach

Bottom Facility Operating Licenses DPR-44 and DPR-56, and knows the contents thereof; and that the statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

I i~

E A'#,t Vice Presiden 4

4 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 bay of 4 LM 1995.

G n b

Notary Public Ma Lou ro l, Notary Public My Com sio E'xp es ha 1999 Moncar PennsylvantaAmunationof Nntanes