IR 05000373/2008502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/06/2008
| issue date = 06/06/2008
| title = IR 05000373-08-502, 05000374-08-502, on 04/28/2008 - 05/02/2008, LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline Inspection
| title = IR 05000373-08-502, 05000374-08-502, on 04/28/2008 - 05/02/2008, LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline Inspection
| author name = Duncan E R
| author name = Duncan E
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/PSB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/PSB
| addressee name = Pardee C G
| addressee name = Pardee C
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| docket = 05000373, 05000374
| docket = 05000373, 05000374
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:une 6, 2008
[[Issue date::June 6, 2008]]


Mr. Charles Chief Nuclear Officer and Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville IL 60555
==SUBJECT:==
LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BIENNIAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE BASELINE INSPECTION 05000373/2008502; 05000374/2008502


SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BIENNIAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE BASELINE INSPECTION 05000373/2008502; 05000374/2008502
==Dear Mr. Pardee:==
On May 2, 2008, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline inspection at your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were discussed on May 2, 2008, with the Site Vice President, Mr. Daniel Enright, and other members of your staff.


==Dear Mr. Pardee:==
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
On May 2, 2008, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline inspection at your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were discussed on May 2, 2008, with the Site Vice President, Mr. Daniel Enright, and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no NRC-identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


Sincerely,/RA by D. Funk acting for/
Based on the results of this inspection, no NRC-identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified.
Eric Duncan, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374 License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18


===Enclosure:===
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Inspection Report 05000373/2008502; 05000374/2008502


===w/Attachment:===
Sincerely,
Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station Plant Manager - LaSalle County Station Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President Senior Vice President - Midwest Operations Senior Vice President - Operations Support Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Director - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Manager Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle Associate General Counsel Document Control Desk - Licensing Assistant Attorney General J. Klinger, State Liaison Officer Illinois Emergency Management Agency Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Illinois Emergency Management Agency
/RA by D. Funk acting for/
Eric Duncan, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374 License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18 Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000373/2008502; 05000374/2008502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station Plant Manager - LaSalle County Station Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President Senior Vice President - Midwest Operations Senior Vice President - Operations Support Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Director - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Manager Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle Associate General Counsel Document Control Desk - Licensing Assistant Attorney General J. Klinger, State Liaison Officer Illinois Emergency Management Agency Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Illinois Emergency Management Agency


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
IR 05000373/2008502, 05000374/2008502; 04/28/2008 - 05/02/2008; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline Inspection. This report covers a 1 week period of baseline inspection by a resident inspector and two regional inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.
IR 05000373/2008502, 05000374/2008502; 04/28/2008 - 05/02/2008; LaSalle County Station,
 
Units 1 and 2; Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline Inspection.
 
This report covers a 1 week period of baseline inspection by a resident inspector and two regional inspectors. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.


===A. NRC-Identified===
===NRC-Identified===
and Self-Revealed Findings
and Self-Revealed Findings


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
No violations of significance were identified.
No violations of significance were identified.


===B. Licensee-Identified Violations===
===Licensee-Identified Violations===


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
Line 58: Line 62:
==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==


===Cornerstone:===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
Emergency Preparedness
{{a|1EP1}}
{{a|1EP1}}
==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation==
==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation==
Line 66: Line 69:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the April 30, 2008, biennial emergency preparedness exercise's objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensee's emergency plan and to verify that the exercise's simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensee's capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2006, 2007, and 2008, to verify that those drills' scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the April 30, 2008, exercise. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
The inspectors reviewed the April 30, 2008, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2006, 2007, and 2008, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the April 30, 2008, exercise.
 
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
* Control Room Simulator (CRS);
* Control Room Simulator (CRS);
* Technical Support Center (TSC); and
* Technical Support Center (TSC); and
* Emergency Operations Facility (EOF). The inspectors also assessed the licensee's recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensee's emergency plan. The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensee's initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensee's lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensee's findings and assessments of its exercise participants' performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors' independent observations and assessments to assess the licensee's ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constituted a single sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71114.01-05.
* Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
 
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan.
 
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
 
This inspection constituted a single sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71114.01-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 81: Line 92:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance performance indicator (PI) for the period from the 3 rd quarter 2007 through the 1 st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during predesignated control room simulator training sessions, performance during the 2008 biennial exercise, and performance during other drills. Specific documents reviewed are described in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constitutes one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance performance indicator (PI) for the period from the 3rd quarter 2007 through the 1st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during predesignated control room simulator training sessions, performance during the 2008 biennial exercise, and performance during other drills. Specific documents reviewed are described in the to this report.
 
This inspection constitutes one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 89: Line 102:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation performance indicator for the period from the the 3 rd quarter 2007 through the 1 st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2008 biennial exercise and other drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Specific documents reviewed are described in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constitutes one ERO drill participation sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation performance indicator for the period from the the 3rd quarter 2007 through the 1st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2008 biennial exercise and other drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions.
 
Specific documents reviewed are described in the Attachment to this report.
 
This inspection constitutes one ERO drill participation sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 97: Line 114:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) performance indicator for the period from the the 3 rd quarter 2007 through the 1 st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic ANS operability tests. Specific documents reviewed are described in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constitutes one alert and notification system sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)performance indicator for the period from the the 3rd quarter 2007 through the 1st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic ANS operability tests. Specific documents reviewed are described in the to this report.
 
This inspection constitutes one alert and notification system sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Management Meetings==
==4OA6 Management Meetings==


===.1 Exit Meeting Summary===
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary===
* On May 2, 2008, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Enright, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
* On May 2, 2008, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Enright, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
 
The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.


ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
Line 113: Line 134:
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==


Licensee  
Licensee
: [[contact::D. Enright]], LaSalle Site Vice President  
: [[contact::D. Enright]], LaSalle Site Vice President
: [[contact::D. Rhoades]], LaSalle Plant Manager  
: [[contact::D. Rhoades]], LaSalle Plant Manager
: [[contact::K. Appel]], Emergency Preparedness Manager Midwest Region  
: [[contact::K. Appel]], Emergency Preparedness Manager Midwest Region
: [[contact::J. Hughes]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator  
: [[contact::J. Hughes]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
: [[contact::K. Ihnen]], Nuclear Oversight Manager  
: [[contact::K. Ihnen]], Nuclear Oversight Manager
: [[contact::S. Marik]], Operation Director  
: [[contact::S. Marik]], Operation Director
: [[contact::K. Rusley]], Emergency Preparedness Manager  
: [[contact::K. Rusley]], Emergency Preparedness Manager
: [[contact::T. Simpkin]], Regulatory Affairs Manger
: [[contact::T. Simpkin]], Regulatory Affairs Manger
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
: [[contact::G. Roach]], Senior Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::G. Roach]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::F. Ramirez]], Resident Inspector
: [[contact::F. Ramirez]], Resident Inspector
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
: [[contact::J. Yesinowski]], Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::J. Yesinowski]], Resident Inspector


==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
Line 132: Line 153:
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed===
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed===


None
None


==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection.
 
: Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort.
: Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report. CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS REVIEWED Number Description or Title Date
: AR 00754962 NOS: EP Pre-Exercise Simulator Performance Issues March 26, 2008
: AR 00752478 Pre-Exercise DEP Failure to Classify in Timely Manner March 20, 2008
: AR 00752478 Root Cause Investigation Report Content and Format April 24, 2008
: AR 00441782 Apparent Cause Report March 4, 2006
: IR 00752398 EP
: PI-July 2007 Correction to DEP Data March 20, 2008
: IR 00752376 EP
: PI-November 2007 Correction to Participation Data March 20, 2008
: MISCELLANEOUS
: Description or Title Date or Revision LaSalle 1
st Quarter 2007 PI Drill Findings and Observations Report February 7, 2007
: LaSalle 2
nd Quarter 2007 PI Drill Findings and Observations Report July 6, 2007
: LaSalle 3
rd and 4 th Quarter PI Drill Findings and Observations Report November 5, 2007
: LaSalle 2008 NRC Graded Exercise Evaluation Report April 30, 2008
: LaSalle 2008 Pre-Exercise Evaluation Report March 19, 2008
: LaSalle 2007 Off-Year Exercise Evaluation Report August 22, 2007
: LaSalle 2006 Through 2008 Exercise Timelines 
: WORK DOCUMENTS
: Number Description or Title Date or Revision
: LS-AA-2110 Monthly Data Elements For NRC ERO Drill Participation, 3
rd Quarter 2007 through 1
st Quarter 2008
: LS-AA-2120 Monthly Data Elements for NRC Drill/Exercise Performance, 3 rd Quarter 2007 through 1
st Quarter 2008
: LS-AA-2130 Monthly PI Elements for NRC Alert and Notification System Reliability, 3
rd Quarter 2007 through 1
st Quarter 2008
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
: [[USED]] [[]]
: [[ADAMS]] [[NRC's Document System]]
: [[ANS]] [[Alert and Notification System]]
: [[CFR]] [[Code of Federal Regulations]]
: [[CRS]] [[Control Room Simulator]]
: [[EOF]] [[Emergency Operations Facility]]
: [[ERO]] [[Emergency Response Organization]]
: [[IR]] [[Issue Report]]
: [[NEI]] [[Nuclear Energy Institute]]
: [[NRC]] [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]
: [[PARS]] [[Publicly Available Records]]
: [[PI]] [[Performance Indicators TSC Technical Support Center]]
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:44, 22 December 2019

IR 05000373-08-502, 05000374-08-502, on 04/28/2008 - 05/02/2008, LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline Inspection
ML081610749
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/06/2008
From: Eric Duncan
Plant Support Branch II
To: Pardee C
Exelon Generation Co
References
IR-08-502
Download: ML081610749 (13)


Text

une 6, 2008

SUBJECT:

LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BIENNIAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE BASELINE INSPECTION 05000373/2008502; 05000374/2008502

Dear Mr. Pardee:

On May 2, 2008, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline inspection at your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were discussed on May 2, 2008, with the Site Vice President, Mr. Daniel Enright, and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no NRC-identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA by D. Funk acting for/

Eric Duncan, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374 License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18 Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000373/2008502; 05000374/2008502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station Plant Manager - LaSalle County Station Regulatory Assurance Manager - LaSalle County Station Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President Senior Vice President - Midwest Operations Senior Vice President - Operations Support Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Director - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Manager Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle Associate General Counsel Document Control Desk - Licensing Assistant Attorney General J. Klinger, State Liaison Officer Illinois Emergency Management Agency Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Illinois Emergency Management Agency

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000373/2008502, 05000374/2008502; 04/28/2008 - 05/02/2008; LaSalle County Station,

Units 1 and 2; Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Baseline Inspection.

This report covers a 1 week period of baseline inspection by a resident inspector and two regional inspectors. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.

NRC-Identified

and Self-Revealed Findings

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No violations of significance were identified.

Licensee-Identified Violations

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No violations of significance were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

.1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the April 30, 2008, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2006, 2007, and 2008, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the April 30, 2008, exercise.

The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:

  • Control Room Simulator (CRS);
  • Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).

The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan.

The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This inspection constituted a single sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71114.01-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151-05)

.1 Drill/Exercise Performance

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance performance indicator (PI) for the period from the 3rd quarter 2007 through the 1st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during predesignated control room simulator training sessions, performance during the 2008 biennial exercise, and performance during other drills. Specific documents reviewed are described in the to this report.

This inspection constitutes one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation performance indicator for the period from the the 3rd quarter 2007 through the 1st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2008 biennial exercise and other drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions.

Specific documents reviewed are described in the Attachment to this report.

This inspection constitutes one ERO drill participation sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.3 Alert and Notification System

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)performance indicator for the period from the the 3rd quarter 2007 through the 1st quarter 2008. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 5, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic ANS operability tests. Specific documents reviewed are described in the to this report.

This inspection constitutes one alert and notification system sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA6 Management Meetings

.1 Exit Meeting Summary

  • On May 2, 2008, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. D. Enright, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.

The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

D. Enright, LaSalle Site Vice President
D. Rhoades, LaSalle Plant Manager
K. Appel, Emergency Preparedness Manager Midwest Region
J. Hughes, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
K. Ihnen, Nuclear Oversight Manager
S. Marik, Operation Director
K. Rusley, Emergency Preparedness Manager
T. Simpkin, Regulatory Affairs Manger

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

G. Roach, Senior Resident Inspector
F. Ramirez, Resident Inspector

Illinois Emergency Management Agency

J. Yesinowski, Resident Inspector

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed, and Discussed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED