ML15121A651: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15121A651
| number = ML15121A651
| issue date = 04/29/2015
| issue date = 04/29/2015
| title = Ltr 04/29/15 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (Cdbi) Inspection Report 05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007 (Jen)
| title = Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) Inspection Report 05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007 (Jen)
| author name = Lipa C A
| author name = Lipa C
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
| addressee name = Davison K
| addressee name = Davison K
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000282/2015007]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000282/2015007]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
[[Issue date::April 29, 2015]]
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                REGION III
                                      2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
                                            LISLE, IL 60532-4352
                                              April 29, 2015
Mr. Kevin Davison
Site Vice President
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant
Northern States Power Company, Minnesota
1717 Wakonade Drive East
Welch, MN 55089
SUBJECT: PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST
              FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT
              DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) INSPECTION REPORT 05000282/2015007;
              05000306/2015007
Dear Mr. Davison:
On August 3, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial
baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Prairie Island Nuclear Generating
Plant, Units 1 and 2. A team of six inspectors will perform this 3-week inspection. This
inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure
(IP) 71111.21.
The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components
associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed
during this baseline inspection will be identified during the inoffice preparation week that occurs
prior to the first on-site inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated
with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request
scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your
simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which
would most likely occur during the second on-site week. The team will work closely with your
staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with
minimal impact.
The inspection will include 3 weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC
inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance, and one on operations.
The current inspection schedule is as follows:
*  On-site weeks:       August 3-7, 2015;
                          August 17-21, 2015; and
                          August 31-September 4, 2015.
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 27-31, 2015, as
discussed in the attached enclosure.


Mr. Kevin Davison Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company, Minnesota 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089
K. Davison                                     -2-
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
inspection.
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
*    The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
    This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 23, 2015. By
    July 10, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately
    15 components.
*    The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office
    preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the
    initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office
    no later than July 22, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may identify
    additional information needed to support the inspection.
*    The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference
    material. This information should be available to the team onsite on August 3, 2015. It is
    also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the
    inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.
The lead inspector for this inspection is James Neurauter. We understand that our licensing
contact for this inspection is Benjamin Hammargren of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
lead inspector at (630) 829-9828 or via e-mail at James.Neurauter@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.


SUBJECT: PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) INSPECTION REPORT 05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007
K. Davison                                    -3-
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                              Sincerely,
                                              /RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/
                                              Christine A. Lipa, Chief
                                              Engineering Branch 2
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-282; 50-306
License Nos. DPR-42; DPR-60
Enclosure:
  Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI)
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV


==Dear Mr. Davison:==
    INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
On August 3, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. A team of six inspectors will perform this 3-week inspection. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21. The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the first on-site inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second on-site week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact. The inspection will include 3 weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance, and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows: On-site weeks: August 3-7, 2015; August 17-21, 2015; and August 31-September 4, 2015. The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 27-31, 2015, as discussed in the attached enclosure. Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups: The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 23, 2015. By July 10, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately 15 components. The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 22, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on August 3, 2015. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated. The lead inspector for this inspection is James Neurauter. We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is Benjamin Hammargren of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9828 or via e-mail at James.Neurauter@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
Inspection Report:              05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Inspection Dates:               August 3-7, 2015;
                                August 17-21, 2015; and
                                August 31-September 4, 2015.
Inspection Procedure:            IP 71111.21 Component Design Bases Inspection
Lead Inspector:                  James Neurauter, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS
                                (630) 829-9828
                                James.Neurauter@nrc.gov
I.     Information Requested Prior to the On-site Information Gathering/Inspection Week
      The following information is requested by June 23, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate
      inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call
      the team leader as soon as possible. Please provide the information electronically in
      pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
      media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should
      contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
      Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by
      someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.
      1.       Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic safety
                analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for
                Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth (RRW), and Fussell-Veseley (FV)
                (as applicable).
      2.       Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early
                Release Frequency [LERF]) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.
      3.       Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
      4.      Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA
                that contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage
                frequency (CDF).
      5.      Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.
      6.      List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
                performance measures (JPMs).
      7.      Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures (EOPs).
      8.       If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information
                requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative
                description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
                                                                                            Enclosure


Sincerely,/RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/
    INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
Christine A. Lipa, Chief Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-282; 50-306 License Nos. DPR-42; DPR-60
      9.      Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External
              Events (IPEEE), if available.
      10.    Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations
              with low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or
              pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers
              close to rated design heat removal etc.).
      11.    List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
              (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve (MOV)
              and Air-Operated Valve (AOV) Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin
              was determined.
      12.    List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
              or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
              PSA).
      13.    Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1)
              category for the last 3 years.
      14.    Site top ten issues list (if applicable).
      15.    A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
      16.    Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last
              5 years at your facility.
      17.    List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
              issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.
      18.    List of open operability evaluations.
      19.    List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
      20.    Current management and engineering organizational chart.
      21.     Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
              Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
              Manual.
      22.    Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
      23.    Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).
II.   Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be
      Available by July 22, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office
      during the week of July 27-31, 2015).
      This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
      provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
      condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
                                                  2


===Enclosure:===
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) Enclosure Inspection Report: 05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007 Inspection Dates: August 3-7, 2015; August 17-21, 2015; and August 31-September 4, 2015. Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21 "Component Design Bases Inspection" Lead Inspector: James Neurauter, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS (630) 829-9828 James.Neurauter@nrc.gov I. Information Requested Prior to the On-site Information Gathering/Inspection Week The following information is requested by June 23, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. Please provide the information electronically in "pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology. 1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth (RRW), and Fussell-Veseley (FV) (as applicable). 2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release Frequency [LERF]) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW. 3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA. 4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency (CDF). 5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks" and latest PSA summary document. 6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures (JPMs). 7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures (EOPs). 8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
  1.  List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of
      the selected components for the last 6 years.
  2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with
      each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of
      preventive maintenance activities.
  3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
      previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and
      also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,
      engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded
      from this request
  4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
      Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
  5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
      associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
      descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
      only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
  6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with
      each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
  7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
      selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
  8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
      components, if applicable.
  9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for
      last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other
      vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate
      results, etc.).
  10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with
      the selected components and selected scenarios.
  11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective
      action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
  12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for
      example:
          *    Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
          *    Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks,
                etc.
          *    Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan
                flows, etc.
      Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
                                          3


INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) 2 9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE), if available. 10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.). 11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve (MOV) and Air-Operated Valve (AOV) Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined. 12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PSA). 13. Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last 3 years. 14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable). 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years. 16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 years at your facility. 17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years. 18. List of open operability evaluations. 19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming. 20. Current management and engineering organizational chart. 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies). 23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available). II. Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be Available by July 22, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of July 27-31, 2015). This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
    INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) 3 1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the selected components for the last 6 years. 2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities. 3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this request 4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components. 5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications. 6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable. 7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable. 8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected components, if applicable. 9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components' performance for last 3 years (For example, pumps' performance including in-service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate results, etc.). 10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the selected components and selected scenarios. 11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection. 12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example: Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc. Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
        13.   A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
III.   Additional Information to be Provided on August 3, 2015, On-Site (for final
        selected components)
        1.     During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections
              and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The
              lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the
              week of July 27-31, 2015.
        2.    Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
              components during the three onsite inspection weeks.
IV.     Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
        1.     Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
              questions or queries during this inspection.
        2.     Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
              status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection
              to each team member).
        3.     One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).
        4.     Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):
              *  Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment (IPE/PRA)
                  Report;
              *  Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
              *  Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
              *  Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
                                                  4


INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) 4 13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years. III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 3, 2015, On-Site (for final selected components) 1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of July 27-31, 2015. 2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the three onsite inspection weeks. IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection 1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the team's questions or queries during this inspection. 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). 3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies). 4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks): Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment (IPE/PRA) Report; Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable); Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and Vendor manuals. If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
K. Davison                                                                -3-
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                                                          Sincerely,
                                                                          /RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/
                                                                          Christine A. Lipa, Chief
                                                                          Engineering Branch 2
                                                                          Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-282; 50-306
License Nos. DPR-42; DPR-60
Enclosure:
  Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI)
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
DISTRIBUTION w/encl:
Kimyata MorganButler
RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland Resource
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
Darrell Roberts
Richard Skokowski
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
DRPIII
DRSIII
Jim Clay
Carmen Olteanu
ADAMS Accession Number ML15121A651
    Publicly Available                          Non-Publicly Available                    Sensitive                Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE              RIII                                RIII                            RIII                              RIII
NAME                JNeurauter:cl                        ADunlop for CLipa
DATE                04/29/15                            04/29/15
                                                            OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 01:22, 17 November 2019

Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) Inspection Report 05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007 (Jen)
ML15121A651
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2015
From: Christine Lipa
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Davison K
Northern States Power Co
References
IR 2015007
Download: ML15121A651 (8)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000282/2015007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

April 29, 2015

Mr. Kevin Davison

Site Vice President

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant

Northern States Power Company, Minnesota

1717 Wakonade Drive East

Welch, MN 55089

SUBJECT: PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST

FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT

DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) INSPECTION REPORT 05000282/2015007;

05000306/2015007

Dear Mr. Davison:

On August 3, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial

baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Prairie Island Nuclear Generating

Plant, Units 1 and 2. A team of six inspectors will perform this 3-week inspection. This

inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21.

The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components

associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed

during this baseline inspection will be identified during the inoffice preparation week that occurs

prior to the first on-site inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated

with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request

scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your

simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which

would most likely occur during the second on-site week. The team will work closely with your

staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with

minimal impact.

The inspection will include 3 weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC

inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance, and one on operations.

The current inspection schedule is as follows:

  • On-site weeks: August 3-7, 2015;

August 17-21, 2015; and

August 31-September 4, 2015.

The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 27-31, 2015, as

discussed in the attached enclosure.

K. Davison -2-

Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown

that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the

licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive

inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the

inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

  • The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 23, 2015. By

July 10, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately

15 components.

  • The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office

preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the

initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office

no later than July 22, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may identify

additional information needed to support the inspection.

  • The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference

material. This information should be available to the team onsite on August 3, 2015. It is

also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the

inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is James Neurauter. We understand that our licensing

contact for this inspection is Benjamin Hammargren of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the

lead inspector at (630) 829-9828 or via e-mail at James.Neurauter@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

K. Davison -3-

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-282; 50-306

License Nos. DPR-42; DPR-60

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI)

cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)

Inspection Report: 05000282/2015007; 05000306/2015007

Inspection Dates: August 3-7, 2015;

August 17-21, 2015; and

August 31-September 4, 2015.

Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21 Component Design Bases Inspection

Lead Inspector: James Neurauter, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS

(630) 829-9828

James.Neurauter@nrc.gov

I. Information Requested Prior to the On-site Information Gathering/Inspection Week

The following information is requested by June 23, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate

inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call

the team leader as soon as possible. Please provide the information electronically in

pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic

media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should

contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.

Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by

someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic safety

analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for

Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth (RRW), and Fussell-Veseley (FV)

(as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early

Release Frequency [LERF]) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA

that contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage

frequency (CDF).

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.

6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job

performance measures (JPMs).

7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures (EOPs).

8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information

requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative

description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

Enclosure

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)

9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External

Events (IPEEE), if available.

10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations

with low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or

pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers

close to rated design heat removal etc.).

11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve (MOV)

and Air-Operated Valve (AOV) Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin

was determined.

12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering

or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the

PSA).

13. Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1)

category for the last 3 years.

14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).

15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last

5 years at your facility.

17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design

issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.

18. List of open operability evaluations.

19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.

20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical

Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements

Manual.

22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).

23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).

II. Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be

Available by July 22, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office

during the week of July 27-31, 2015).

This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if

provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,

condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).

2

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)

1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of

the selected components for the last 6 years.

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with

each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of

preventive maintenance activities.

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and

also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,

engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded

from this request

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list

only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with

each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for

last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other

vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate

results, etc.).

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with

the selected components and selected scenarios.

11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective

action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for

example:

  • Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
  • Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks,

etc.

  • Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan

flows, etc.

Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

3

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)

13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 3, 2015, On-Site (for final

selected components)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections

and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The

lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the

week of July 27-31, 2015.

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the three onsite inspection weeks.

IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection

to each team member).

3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).

4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):

  • Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment (IPE/PRA)

Report;

  • Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
  • Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
  • Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

4

K. Davison -3-

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-282; 50-306

License Nos. DPR-42; DPR-60

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI)

cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION w/encl:

Kimyata MorganButler

RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland Resource

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML15121A651

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME JNeurauter:cl ADunlop for CLipa

DATE 04/29/15 04/29/15

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15121A651&oldid=2164811"