IR 05000361/2011403: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ber 23, 2011
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUC LEAR REGULATOR Y C OMMISSI ON ber 23, 2011


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2011403; 05000362/2011403
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2011403; 05000362/2011403


==Dear Mr. Dietrich:==
==Dear Mr. Dietrich:==
On September 23, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the Security Cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 23, 2011, with Mr. D. Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members of your staff.
On September 23, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the Security Cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 23, 2011, with Mr. D. Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members of your staff.


The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


This report documents one NRC-identified finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). This deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. Additionally, one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, because of the very low security significance and because these violations were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations as noncited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these noncited violations, UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125
This report documents one NRC-identified finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). This deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. Additionally, one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, because of the very low security significance and because these violations were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations as noncited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these noncited violations, Southern California Edison Company -2-you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 E. Lamar Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas, 76011-4125; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
 
Southern California Edison Company - 2 - you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 E. Lamar Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas, 76011-4125; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.


Additionally, the NRC-identified finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with the decision-making component because the licensee failed to make risk-significant decisions using a systematic process, especially when faced with unexpected plant conditions, to ensure safety is maintained [H.1(a)]. If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Additionally, the NRC-identified finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with the decision-making component because the licensee failed to make risk-significant decisions using a systematic process, especially when faced with unexpected plant conditions, to ensure safety is maintained [H.1(a)]. If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, ADAMS.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, ADAMS.


ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained  
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.


in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosure will not be available for public inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response "Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390" and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/
Michael C. Hay, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety  
Michael C. Hay, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No: 50-361, 50-362 License No: NPF-10, NPF-15 Southern California Edison Company -3-Nonpublic Enclosure:
 
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2011403; 05000362/2011403 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/o enclosure:
Docket No: 50-361, 50-362 License No: NPF-10, NPF-15  
Richard J. St. Onge Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 Linda Conklin Manager, Nuclear Licensing Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 Douglas K. Porter Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Distribution w/enclosure:
 
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43 Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6 Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)
Southern California Edison Company - 3 - Nonpublic Enclosure:
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Michael.Ernstes@nrc.gov Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2011403; 05000362/2011403 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information  
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)
 
cc w/o enclosure:
Richard J. St. Onge Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128  
 
Linda Conklin Manager, Nuclear Licensing Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128  
 
Douglas K. Porter Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Distribution w/enclosure: Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43 Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6 Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Michael.Ernstes@nrc.gov Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)  
 
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Electronic distribution by RIV:
bcc w/o enclosure:  
bcc w/o enclosure:
 
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)
DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)
Line 81: Line 70:
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource RIV/ETA: OEDO (John.McHale@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource RIV/ETA: OEDO (John.McHale@nrc.gov)
DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)  
DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
 
Report:
Report:
SUNSI Review Completed: JRL ADAMS: X Yes No Initials: JRL Publicly Available X Non-Publicly Available X Sensitive Non-Sensitive  
SUNSI Review Completed: JRL ADAMS: X Yes No Initials: JRL Publicly Available X Non-Publicly Available X Sensitive Non-Sensitive Letter Only:
 
SUNSI Review Completed: JRL ADAMS: X Yes Initials: JRL X Publicly Available Non-Sensitive SPSI:PSB1 Peer:PSB1 C:PBD C:PSB1 JRLarsen JLBuchanan RELantz MCHay
Letter Only:
/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/
SUNSI Review Completed: JRL ADAMS: X Yes Initials: JRL X Publicly Available Non-Sensitive  
10/12/11 10/19/11 10/18/11 10/23/11 OFFICIAL COPY T=Telephone E=E-Mail F=FAX
 
SPSI:PSB1 Peer:PSB1 C:PBD C:PSB1 JRLarsen JLBuchanan RELantz MCHay /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ 10/12/11 10/19/11 10/18/11 10/23/11 OFFICIAL COPY T=Telephone E=E-Mail F=FAX
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:06, 12 November 2019

Generation Station, Units 2 and 3 - NRC Security Inspection Report 05000361/11-403; 05000362/11-403
ML112971231
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 10/23/2011
From: Hay M
Plant Support Branch-1
To: Peter Dietrich
Southern California Edison Co
References
IR-11-403
Download: ML112971231 (4)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUC LEAR REGULATOR Y C OMMISSI ON ber 23, 2011

SUBJECT:

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -

NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2011403; 05000362/2011403

Dear Mr. Dietrich:

On September 23, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the Security Cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 23, 2011, with Mr. D. Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one NRC-identified finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). This deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. Additionally, one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, because of the very low security significance and because these violations were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations as noncited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these noncited violations, Southern California Edison Company -2-you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 E. Lamar Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas, 76011-4125; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

Additionally, the NRC-identified finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with the decision-making component because the licensee failed to make risk-significant decisions using a systematic process, especially when faced with unexpected plant conditions, to ensure safety is maintained H.1(a). If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, ADAMS.

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Michael C. Hay, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No: 50-361, 50-362 License No: NPF-10, NPF-15 Southern California Edison Company -3-Nonpublic Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2011403; 05000362/2011403 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/o enclosure:

Richard J. St. Onge Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 Linda Conklin Manager, Nuclear Licensing Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 Douglas K. Porter Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Distribution w/enclosure:

Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43 Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6 Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Michael.Ernstes@nrc.gov Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)

Electronic distribution by RIV:

bcc w/o enclosure:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)

DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)

DRS Deputy Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer, DRP/D (Don.Allen@nrc.gov)

SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)

Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)

Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)

Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)

OEMail Resource RIV/ETA: OEDO (John.McHale@nrc.gov)

DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)

Report:

SUNSI Review Completed: JRL ADAMS: X Yes No Initials: JRL Publicly Available X Non-Publicly Available X Sensitive Non-Sensitive Letter Only:

SUNSI Review Completed: JRL ADAMS: X Yes Initials: JRL X Publicly Available Non-Sensitive SPSI:PSB1 Peer:PSB1 C:PBD C:PSB1 JRLarsen JLBuchanan RELantz MCHay

/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/

10/12/11 10/19/11 10/18/11 10/23/11 OFFICIAL COPY T=Telephone E=E-Mail F=FAX

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000361/2011403&oldid=2110848"