ML17335A148: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Indiana Michigan~Power Company 500 Circle Drive Buchanan, Ml 491071395INOIAliM MICHIGAN POEM July 31, 1998 AEP:NRC:1260G7 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop 0-P1-17 Washington, D.C.20555-0001 Gentlemen:
{{#Wiki_filter:Indiana Michigan Power Company
Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)REGARDING THE 2.206 PETITION FILED BY THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS On June 8, 1998, the NRC requested that we provide information, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)regarding concerns raised in the above referenced petition filed October 9, 1997, and supplemented on January 12, 1998, respectively.
                              ~
This letter and the attachment are being submitted in response to your request.In accordance with our letter of July 21, 1998, the due date for this information was revised to July 31, 1998.Our response includes information that addresses questions related to: 1)the details of programs that will be used to evaluate safety-related systems;2)expected status of safety-related systems with respect to conformance with the licensing'nd design basis;3)programmatic changes that will be implemented at Cook Nuclear Plant before restart;and 4)responses to each of the specific issues 1 thru 5 as set forth in enclosure 1 of the NRC's letter dated June 8, 1998.The specific issues identified in the NRC's letter are based on the supplement to the 2.206 petition, dated January 12, 1998,,and include: ice condenser action plans;assessment of safety evaluations performed under the old 10 CFR 50.59 process;results of the engineering calculation assessments performed to date;the net positive suction head (NPSH)calculations for safety-related pumps, which are being submitted as proprietary information; and actions taken to address the February 6, 1997, AEP response to the NRC 50.54(f)request for information.
500 Circle Drive Buchanan, Ml 491071395 INOIAliM MICHIGAN POEM July 31,       1998 AEP:NRC:1260G7 Docket Nos.:         50-315 50-316 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:       Document Control Desk Mail Stop 0-P1-17 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Gentlemen:
The information included in this response represents the status of our actions to date.We are performing additional activities associated with the Cook Nuclear Plant restart plan.Issues identified as a result of these ongoing activities will be dispositioned in accordance with our restart plan and the ongoing 0350 process.NRC permission for restart will not be requested until the restart plan is complete and reasonable assurance of restart readiness is achieved.A 9808i00089'9'808'%7 PDR ADOCK 05000M5 H PDR 0 I U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 AEP:NRC:1260G7 This letter is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)Sincerely, J.R.Sampson Site Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSC ED BEFORE ME THIS~AY OF 1998 No a Public My Commission Expires+/4KB~/jen Attachment c J~A.Abramson J.L.Caldwell D.A.Lochbaum, UCS MDEQ-DW 6c RPD NRC Resident Inspector C.J~Paperiello C y fr gf',,/(t l}}
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f) REGARDING THE 2.206 PETITION FILED BY THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS On June 8, 1998, the NRC requested that we provide information, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) regarding concerns raised in the above referenced petition filed October 9, 1997, and supplemented on January           12, 1998,     respectively. This letter and the attachment are being submitted in response to your request. In accordance with our letter of July 21, 1998, the due date for this information         was revised to July 31, 1998.
Our response           includes information that addresses     questions related to: 1) the details of programs that will be used to evaluate         safety-related systems; 2) expected status of safety-related systems with respect to conformance with the that will be licensing'nd design basis;         3)   programmatic changes implemented at Cook Nuclear Plant before restart;                             and 4) responses to each of the specific issues 1 thru 5 as set forth in enclosure 1 of the NRC's letter dated June 8, 1998. The specific issues identified in the NRC's letter are based on the supplement to the 2.206 petition, dated January 12, 1998,,and include: ice condenser         action plans; assessment       of safety evaluations performed under the old 10 CFR 50.59 process; results of the engineering calculation assessments performed to date; the net positive suction head (NPSH) calculations for safety-related pumps, which are being submitted as proprietary information; and actions taken to address the February 6, 1997, AEP response to the NRC 50.54(f) request for information.
The information included in this response represents the status of our actions to date. We are performing additional activities associated with the Cook Nuclear Plant restart plan.                           Issues identified as a result of these ongoing activities will be dispositioned in accordance with our restart plan and the ongoing 0350 process.           NRC permission for restart will not be requested until the restart plan is complete and reasonable assurance of restart readiness is achieved.
A 9808i00089'9'808'%7 PDR   ADOCK   05000M5 H                     PDR
 
0 I
 
U. S. Nuclear   Regulatory Commission               AEP:NRC:1260G7 Page 2 This letter is   submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)
Sincerely, J. R. Sampson Site Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSC       ED BEFORE ME THIS     ~AY OF                 1998 No a   Public My Commission   Expires +/ 4KB~
/jen Attachment c     J ~ A. Abramson J. L. Caldwell D. A. Lochbaum, UCS MDEQ - DW 6c RPD NRC Resident Inspector C. J ~ Paperiello
 
C y fr gf',, / (
t l}}

Latest revision as of 11:05, 22 October 2019

Responds to RAI Per 10CFR50.54 Re 2.206 Petition Filed by Union of Concerned Scientists.Info Included in Response Represents Status of Licensee Actions to Date
ML17335A148
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/1998
From: Sampson J
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17335A147 List:
References
2.206, AEP:NRC:1260G7, NUDOCS 9808100089
Download: ML17335A148 (4)
v • d • e


Text

Indiana Michigan Power Company

~

500 Circle Drive Buchanan, Ml 491071395 INOIAliM MICHIGAN POEM July 31, 1998 AEP:NRC:1260G7 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop 0-P1-17 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Gentlemen:

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f) REGARDING THE 2.206 PETITION FILED BY THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS On June 8, 1998, the NRC requested that we provide information, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) regarding concerns raised in the above referenced petition filed October 9, 1997, and supplemented on January 12, 1998, respectively. This letter and the attachment are being submitted in response to your request. In accordance with our letter of July 21, 1998, the due date for this information was revised to July 31, 1998.

Our response includes information that addresses questions related to: 1) the details of programs that will be used to evaluate safety-related systems; 2) expected status of safety-related systems with respect to conformance with the that will be licensing'nd design basis; 3) programmatic changes implemented at Cook Nuclear Plant before restart; and 4) responses to each of the specific issues 1 thru 5 as set forth in enclosure 1 of the NRC's letter dated June 8, 1998. The specific issues identified in the NRC's letter are based on the supplement to the 2.206 petition, dated January 12, 1998,,and include: ice condenser action plans; assessment of safety evaluations performed under the old 10 CFR 50.59 process; results of the engineering calculation assessments performed to date; the net positive suction head (NPSH) calculations for safety-related pumps, which are being submitted as proprietary information; and actions taken to address the February 6, 1997, AEP response to the NRC 50.54(f) request for information.

The information included in this response represents the status of our actions to date. We are performing additional activities associated with the Cook Nuclear Plant restart plan. Issues identified as a result of these ongoing activities will be dispositioned in accordance with our restart plan and the ongoing 0350 process. NRC permission for restart will not be requested until the restart plan is complete and reasonable assurance of restart readiness is achieved.

A 9808i00089'9'808'%7 PDR ADOCK 05000M5 H PDR

0 I

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:1260G7 Page 2 This letter is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)

Sincerely, J. R. Sampson Site Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSC ED BEFORE ME THIS ~AY OF 1998 No a Public My Commission Expires +/ 4KB~

/jen Attachment c J ~ A. Abramson J. L. Caldwell D. A. Lochbaum, UCS MDEQ - DW 6c RPD NRC Resident Inspector C. J ~ Paperiello

C y fr gf',, / (

t l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17335A148&oldid=1966623"