ML090710108: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 03/17/2009
| issue date = 03/17/2009
| title = Request for Additional Information, Alternative for the Repair and Inservice Inspection of Control Rod Drive Stub Tubes for the License Renewal Period of Extended Operation
| title = Request for Additional Information, Alternative for the Repair and Inservice Inspection of Control Rod Drive Stub Tubes for the License Renewal Period of Extended Operation
| author name = Guzman R V
| author name = Guzman R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| addressee name = Polson K J
| addressee name = Polson K
| addressee affiliation = Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC
| addressee affiliation = Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC
| docket = 05000220
| docket = 05000220
| license number = DPR-063
| license number = DPR-063
| contact person = Guzman R V, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
| contact person = Guzman R, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
| case reference number = TAC MD9604
| case reference number = TAC MD9604
| document type = Letter, Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| document type = Letter, Request for Additional Information (RAI)
Line 27: Line 27:


RAI cc w/encl:
RAI cc w/encl:
Distribution via Listserv REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 REQUEST TO UTILIZE AN ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REPAIR AND INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE STUB TUBES FOR THE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD OF EXTENDED OPERATION DOCKET NO. 50-220 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station (NMPNS or the licensee) submittal for Nine Mile Point Unit NO.1 (NMP1) dated August 29, 2008. The NRC staff has determined that additional information requested below will be needed to support its review. In its proposed alternative for repair of control rod drive stub tubes, the licensee requested in Alternative 1A to apply the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code), Section XI, Code Case N-730, "Roll-Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive [CRD] Bottom Head Penetrations in BWRs." In Alternative 2A, the licensee requested to apply ASME Code, Section XI, Code Case N-730, but with the exception to perform the post-roll expansion VT-2 examination at approximately 900 pounds-per-square inch (psig) prior to returning NMP1 to full power operation. ASME Code Case N-730 requires a repair leakage test at the operating pressure. As the basis for the proposed alternatives (1A and 2A), the submittal references both Title 10 to Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.55a(a)(3)(i) related to demonstrating an acceptable level of quality and safety as well as Section 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) related to demonstrating hardship. Please clarify which regulatory basis is being applied for each alternative when responding to the questions below. RAI-1. For proposed Alternative 1A, provide additional basis for using ASME Code Case N-730 instead of the ASME Code, Section XI, requirements by addressing the 4 considerations of the evaluation stated in Section 5 of the ASME Code Case N-730. If a generic evaluation is available, demonstrate that the generic evaluation is applicable to NMP1. RAI-2. For proposed Alternative 2A, provide the basis for using ASME Code Case N-730 with the exception of performing a leakage test at 900 psig, instead of the ASME Code, Section XI, requirements. If 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) is the applicable regulatory basis, as discussed during the teleconference between NRC and licensee staff on February 19, 2009, provide a more detailed justification to support your use of 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) and, in particular, the following referenced items in your original submittal: Basis for Relief (ii) states, "[i]nspections of CRD stub tubes for leakage durlnq a system leakage test at the nominal operating pressure  
Distribution via Listserv REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 REQUEST TO UTILIZE AN ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REPAIR AND INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE STUB TUBES FOR THE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD OF EXTENDED OPERATION DOCKET NO. 50-220 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station (NMPNS or the licensee) submittal for Nine Mile Point Unit NO.1 (NMP1) dated August 29, 2008. The NRC staff has determined that additional information requested below will be needed to support its review. In its proposed alternative for repair of control rod drive stub tubes, the licensee requested in Alternative 1A to apply the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code), Section XI, Code Case N-730, "Roll-Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive [CRD] Bottom Head Penetrations in BWRs." In Alternative 2A, the licensee requested to apply ASME Code, Section XI, Code Case N-730, but with the exception to perform the post-roll expansion VT-2 examination at approximately 900 pounds-per-square inch (psig) prior to returning NMP1 to full power operation. ASME Code Case N-730 requires a repair leakage test at the operating pressure. As the basis for the proposed alternatives (1A and 2A), the submittal references both Title 10 to Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.55a(a)(3)(i) related to demonstrating an acceptable level of quality and safety as well as Section 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) related to demonstrating hardship. Please clarify which regulatory basis is being applied for each alternative when responding to the questions below. RAI-1. For proposed Alternative 1A, provide additional basis for using ASME Code Case N-730 instead of the ASME Code, Section XI, requirements by addressing the 4 considerations of the evaluation stated in Section 5 of the ASME Code Case N-730. If a generic evaluation is available, demonstrate that the generic evaluation is applicable to NMP1. RAI-2. For proposed Alternative 2A, provide the basis for using ASME Code Case N-730 with the exception of performing a leakage test at 900 psig, instead of the ASME Code, Section XI, requirements. If 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) is the applicable regulatory basis, as discussed during the teleconference between NRC and licensee staff on February 19, 2009, provide a more detailed justification to support your use of 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) and, in particular, the following referenced items in your original submittal: Basis for Relief (ii) states, "[i]nspections of CRD stub tubes for leakage durlnq a system leakage test at the nominal operating pressure
(-1030 psiq) associated with 100% rated reactor power cannot be performed during a normal plant startup, Enclosure   
(-1030 psiq) associated with 100% rated reactor power cannot be performed during a normal plant startup, Enclosure   
-due to the excessive temperature and radiological exposure conditions to which the NDE [nondestructive examination]
-due to the excessive temperature and radiological exposure conditions to which the NDE [nondestructive examination]

Revision as of 01:35, 12 July 2019

Request for Additional Information, Alternative for the Repair and Inservice Inspection of Control Rod Drive Stub Tubes for the License Renewal Period of Extended Operation
ML090710108
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/2009
From: Richard Guzman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Polson K
Nine Mile Point
Guzman R, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
References
TAC MD9604
Download: ML090710108 (4)


Text

UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 17,2009 Mr. Keith J. Polson Vice President Nine Mile Point Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1, ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REPAIR AND INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE STUB TUBES FOR THE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD OF EXTENDED OPERATION (TAC NO. MD9604)

Dear Mr. Polson:

By letter dated August 29, 2008, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, submitted for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff review and approval, Relief Request 11SI-02 for Nine Mile Point Unit No.1 (NMP1). The relief request would allow the use of American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, Code Case N-730, "Roll-Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive [CRD] Bottom Head Penetrations in BWRs," as an alternative permanent repair for CRD housing penetrations that may exhibit leakage during the license renewal period of extended operation (Le., from August 23, 2009 to August 22, 2029) or for the re-roll expansion of any previously roll expanded CRD housing that exhibits a repeat occurrence of leakage. The NRC staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to support its review. Enclosed is the NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI). The RAI was discussed with your staff on February 3 and 19, 2009, and it was agreed that your response would be provided within 60 days from the date of this letter.

Sincerely, Richard V. Guzman, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-220

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl:

Distribution via Listserv REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1 REQUEST TO UTILIZE AN ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REPAIR AND INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE STUB TUBES FOR THE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD OF EXTENDED OPERATION DOCKET NO. 50-220 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station (NMPNS or the licensee) submittal for Nine Mile Point Unit NO.1 (NMP1) dated August 29, 2008. The NRC staff has determined that additional information requested below will be needed to support its review. In its proposed alternative for repair of control rod drive stub tubes, the licensee requested in Alternative 1A to apply the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, Code Case N-730, "Roll-Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive [CRD] Bottom Head Penetrations in BWRs." In Alternative 2A, the licensee requested to apply ASME Code,Section XI, Code Case N-730, but with the exception to perform the post-roll expansion VT-2 examination at approximately 900 pounds-per-square inch (psig) prior to returning NMP1 to full power operation. ASME Code Case N-730 requires a repair leakage test at the operating pressure. As the basis for the proposed alternatives (1A and 2A), the submittal references both Title 10 to Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.55a(a)(3)(i) related to demonstrating an acceptable level of quality and safety as well as Section 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) related to demonstrating hardship. Please clarify which regulatory basis is being applied for each alternative when responding to the questions below. RAI-1. For proposed Alternative 1A, provide additional basis for using ASME Code Case N-730 instead of the ASME Code,Section XI, requirements by addressing the 4 considerations of the evaluation stated in Section 5 of the ASME Code Case N-730. If a generic evaluation is available, demonstrate that the generic evaluation is applicable to NMP1. RAI-2. For proposed Alternative 2A, provide the basis for using ASME Code Case N-730 with the exception of performing a leakage test at 900 psig, instead of the ASME Code,Section XI, requirements. If 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) is the applicable regulatory basis, as discussed during the teleconference between NRC and licensee staff on February 19, 2009, provide a more detailed justification to support your use of 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) and, in particular, the following referenced items in your original submittal: Basis for Relief (ii) states, "[i]nspections of CRD stub tubes for leakage durlnq a system leakage test at the nominal operating pressure

(-1030 psiq) associated with 100% rated reactor power cannot be performed during a normal plant startup, Enclosure

-due to the excessive temperature and radiological exposure conditions to which the NDE [nondestructive examination]

examiners performing the visual VT-2 examinations would be exposed in the primary containment." Provide justification to support this statement as a hardship. Basis for Relief (iii) states, "[tlhls special test usually takes one full day of plant outage time, and the additional valve lineups and system reconfigurations necessary to support this special test impose an additional challenge to the affected systems." Provide justification to support this statement as a hardship.

March 17, 2009 Mr. Keith J. Polson Vice President Nine Mile Point Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.1, ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REPAIR AND INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE STUB TUBES FOR THE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD OF EXTENDED OPERATION (TAC NO. MD9604)

Dear Mr. Polson:

By letter dated August 29, 2008, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, submitted for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff review and approval, Relief Request 11SI-02 for Nine Mile Point Unit NO.1 (NMP1). The relief request would allow the use of American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, Code Case N-730, "Roll-Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive [CRD] Bottom Head Penetrations in BWRs," as an alternative permanent repair for CRD housing penetrations that may exhibit leakage during the license renewal period of extended operation (Le., from August 23, 2009 to August 22, 2029) or for the re-roll expansion of any previously roll expanded CRD housing that exhibits a repeat occurrence of leakage. The NRC staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to support its review.

Enclosed is the NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI). The RAI was discussed with your staff on February 3 and 19, 2009, and it was agreed that your response would be provided within 60 days from the date of this letter.

Sincerely, IRA! Richard V.

Guzman, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-220

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl:

Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrPMRGuzman RidsNrrLASLittle RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource LPLI-1 R/F RidsRgn1 MailCenter RidsOGCRp RidsNrrAcrsAcnw&mMailCenter SSheng RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RAI .h 'd db "I N bt .Ih d NRR058 Accession No.: ML090710108

  • Wit concurrence provt e iv e-man. o su s antia c anqes rna e. LPLI-1/BC MKowal 3/17/09 OFFICE LPLI-1/PM LPLI-1/LA CVIB/BC NAME RGuzman MO'Brien for SLittle*

MMitchell*

DATE 3/12/09 3/12/09 3/12/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy