ML20235F129

Suppl 1 to Discussion & Conclusions Supporting Issuance of Licenses Authorizing 20% Operation of Plant

ML20235F129
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date:	03/31/1972
From:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20235B311	List: IA-87-111, Submits Rept on Plant,As Discussed in ACRS 150th Meeting on 721012-14.Listed Items Can Be Resolved During Const & Facility Can Be Constructed W/Reasonable Assurance for Operation W/O Undue Risk to Public Safety IR 05000254/1972009 IR 05000358/1972003 IR 05000358/1973001 IR 05000358/1973002 IR 05000358/1973003 IR 05000358/1973005 IR 05000358/1973006 IR 05000358/1973007 IR 05000358/1974001 IR 05000358/1974002 IR 05000358/1974003 IR 05000358/1975004 ML20235B308 ML20235B364 ML20235B401 ML20235B405 ML20235B424 ML20235B456 ML20235B461 ML20235B465 ML20235B477 ML20235B488 ML20235B507 ML20235B552 ML20235B582 ML20235B585 ML20235B588 ML20235B605 ML20235B618 ML20235B623 ML20235B649 ML20235B656 ML20235B662 ML20235B670 ML20235B679 ML20235B683 ML20235B687 ML20235B702 ML20235B708 ML20235B713 ML20235B714 ML20235B718 ML20235B720 ML20235B730 ML20235B734 ML20235B748 ML20235B754 ML20235B762 ML20235B764 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-111 NUDOCS 8709280426
Download: ML20235F129 (2)

Text

.

I A. l SUPPLEMENT NO 1 g

)

2 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ,

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY C01 MISSION DIVISIONS OF Rs DIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND i 8

REACTOR LICEMSING 1 PURSUANT TO APPENDIX D OF 10 CFR PART 50 l SUPPORTING THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES TO C010:0NWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

~

AUTHORIZING 20 PERCENT OPERATION OF THE QUAD-CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-254 AND 50-265

- Issued: March 31, 1972 f

e i

I j i

l I

1 l

j709280426 870921 2 .

DR FOIA

~" ~ -~"

iEN287-3Il

~ ~ '--

PDR .e k,

C________.______.__.______ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ Jh

!  ! SUPPLEMENT 'O. 1 v .  !

Subsequent to the issuance of the " Discussion and Conclusions by the U.S. Atomic Energy Ccmmission, Divisions of P.adiolocical and Environmental Protection and P,cactor Licensing Pursuant to Anoendix 0 of 10 CFP Part 50 Supportiag the Issuance of Licenses to Ccmonucalth Edison Company and .

Iowa-11'.<inois Gas and Electric Company Authorizing 20 Percent Oneration of the Quad-Cities. Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-255" 1

' issued January 24,1972 (Discussion and Conclusions), the Commonwealth Edison Company has provided the Commission cooics of an agreement (attachment #1) reached between the Commonwealth Edison Company and the plain .

tiffs in the litigation pending in the U.S. District Court for the District ,.

of Columbia relating to the operation of the Guad Cities Station Units 1 i i

and 2 (The Isaac '.ialton Lear ue of Icerica et al, vs. Jees Schlesincer et al.;~Peoole of :ia na:2 or tiiinois et ai, vs. U.S. ftcm.1c enercy (

Co.miission_ et at .; t,1vil action ios. 220 Wand 22F/1, tne 0.5.

District Court for the District of Colunbia). The agreement sets forth certain modifications of the condenser cooline water system and clans e for operation of Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. The AEC staff has evaluated the contents of the agreenent and has concluded that the staff's -

Discussion and Conclusions, dated January 24, 1972, are unmodified by the contents of the acreenent. The January 24,1972 Discussion and f

Conclusions deal only with the o; eration of Ouad-Citics Station Units 1 and 2 at 20 pcreent of station power until June 1,1972. The staff concludes that operation of the station at 29 oercent of nower for t this period of time will not foreclose any of the alternatives for the protection of the environment.

It is noted that the AEC issued a Draft Detailed Statenent on Endron-mental Considerations relating to the orceosed issuance of a full ten operating license for the Ouad-Cities Station Units 1 and 2 on March 6 ')

i 1972. The Federal Power Cccuission has submitted comments on the draft detailed statement which updates their views on tne need for power from  :

the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 (attachment #2).

The findings on environmental considerations set forth in the AEC staff Discussion and Conclusions of January 24, 1972 and in this supplement are without prejudice to an independent evaluation by the AEC of environ-mental considerations for operation of the Guad citics Units 1 and 2 , ,

in a manner other than 20 percent power for each unit until June 1,1972. .

l In connection with any such future licensing acticn, the AEC will, of  !

course, carefully evaluate the environmental aseccts of any proposed I I

facility changes resulting from the above referenced agreement.  !

4 l

' l l

l T

'k