ML20216B917

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 980113 Meeting W/Util & NRC Re Status of Millstone Unit 2 Independent CA Verification Program.List of Primary Participants,Encl
ML20216B917
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 02/18/1998
From: Curry D
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUM2-PPNR-1139, NUDOCS 9803130224
Download: ML20216B917 (18)
v • d • e


Text

"

PARSONS Daniel L Curry, vice Prescent. nocar services Parsons Energy & Chernicals Group Inc.

2675 Morgantown Road

  • Fax: (610) 855-2002 February 18,1998 Docket No. 50-336 Parsons NUM2-PPNR-1139-L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 2 Lniependent Corrective Action Verification Pronram (ICAVP)

Gentlemen:

On January 13,1998, Parsons Power Group Inc. (PPGI) participated in a publicly observed meeting with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECo). The meeting was held in the training center at the Millstone site. The primary purpose of a portion of the meeting was to discuss the status of the Millstone Unit 2 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP).

PPGI presented an overall Unit 2 project summary and provided the status of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 activities. Key activities included in the project summary include:

e liigh Pressure Safety injection System design and Licensing basis review is 95% complete.

. Tier 2 Critical Design Characteristics validation phase is underway with the RC Flow events complete.

. Tier 3 - Three sample areas completed this month.

e Target submittal date for the Unit 2 ICAVP Final Report is July 10,1998.

Enclosure 1 provides a list of primary participants in the meeting. Enclosure 2 provides the handout used by Parsons during the presentation.

)

Sincerely, j S

Daniel L. Curr/

Parsons ICAVP Project Director k \

DLC:djv Attachments:

Enclosure 1 - List of Primary Participants Enclosure 1 - PPGl Presentation llandout h cc: E. Imbro (?)- USNRC , J. Fougere - NNECo

11. Eichenholz - USNRC 3,, a Rep. Terry Concannon - NEAC R. Laudenat - NNECo 9903130224 980218
" ^ " "

~ #E!' - lil.EI.NI.Ni.lNi.ill.El. lit.

. l i

Enclosure 1 1 List of Primary Participants 1

1

)

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission )

i Gene Imbro Harold Eichenholz Peter Koltay j i

gons Power Group Inc.

Eric Blocher Rich Glaviano Michael Akins John liilbish Northeast Nucbar Enerav Company  ;

i Ray Necci 1 Joseph Fougere Richard Laudenat 4 1

i l

1

i .

l j Enclosure 2 PPGl Presentation llandout i

I

(

1 l

l l

l l

l i

l l

l l

\

I MILLSTONE UNIT 2 STATUS OF ICAVP Parsons Power February 11,1998

{

Waterford, CT

- i h o.om.

l 1

1 Agenda

...n.....--.,.,,

Millstone Unit 2 ICAVP e Project Summary -

E. Blocher s Status Tier 1 Activities -

M. Akins e Status Tier 2 Activities -

R. Glaviano e Status Tier 3 Activities -

J. Hilbish s Project Schedule -

E. Blocher

~ =

W naan.

I

Project Summary e HPSI License / Design Basis review 95% complete 3

e Tier 2 - CDC Validation phase underway (RC flow events complete) e Tier 3 - Phase II samples selected w/e Vendor Manuals e Tier 3 - Three se.mple areas completed this past month e Target submittal date for Unit 2 ICAVP Final Report is July 10,1998

+ All Discrepancy Reports closed

+ Anticipated Disen:pancy Report resolution process

+ All Corrective Actions reviewed an =

  • Ejmnscum i

Preliminary Discrepancy Report Summary s Significance Level of 239 Approved Preliminary DR's 5 Level 1 1 Level 2 105 Level 3 128 Level 4 e Summary by Tier for Preliminary DR's Tier 1 - 202 Tier 2 - 14 Tier 3 - 23

== * (kjmanoum 2

5 4 Discrepancy Report Response Summary

+ 92 Responses received froru NNECo

- 29 DR's Closed

.32 DR Resolutions Pending 25 DR Resolutions Requiring Follow-up i DR Responses In Progress 5 DR Awaiting Revised Responses frorr. NNECo

~~ >

O nn on.

Discrepancy Report Summary e Of the 29 Valid and Closed DR's

- 11 Confirmed Discrepancies

- 11 Previously Identified by NNECo 7 Non-discrepant e Of the 11 Confirmed Discrepancies 0 Level 1

- 0 Level 2 0 Level 3

- 11 Level 4 mm

  • I?]unsaum L

3

c -

. \

y Unit 2 - DR Action Status Prelim DR issued, not Closd Open yet approv Pending Ifollow NECo tion

~ ~ ' "gg PPGI comments in ME R >

Progress NNECo initial

Response

  • ua '

b s*AnSONS i

Project Efficiencies 1 e Twice-weekly Conference Call to discuss technical issues (NRC & NEAC Monitor) continuing e Bi-Weekly Progress Report and Schedule Update e Discrepancy Report Processing

  • Added DR Response Clarification Contact

+ Conducted 2 DR Resolution Conferences e Revised Tier 1 Checklists for Corrective Action Review and Modification Review

=ua '

@]*nannous i

4

Tier Status's E mm.om.

Tier 1 Status

+ HPSI review 95% complete (except CAs) e RRC and EDG Licensing Basis Definition (Form 2) completed

+ Started review of RRC modifications and system components e Started walkdown of EDG electrical systems E mn.ou.

s

> e Tier 1 Status (continued)

+ AFW on hold until receipt of new calculations RAI issued on 2/10/98, full impact of MSLB reanalyses unknown at this time.

+ RAI written for the documents identified in RAI-646 for the various "on-hold" programs.

(6 items) i%_

HPSI System e Outstanding DRs require response before system can be completed s Corrective Action Review in progress, Significance Level 4 items will be grouped by system (6 mn.ou.

6

l l

seien :-

+

  • Tier 1 - HPSI n n ee~eano .neame

.

  • General u _ v. mm eu..e

_ . _- Schedule RAI Resumme gg k F,.7 . . ,

,. La Does Mod R*We*

Cei.e . . , . Ci a g AN FDClie

}[ ][ 3 ReermOces OscW h

ope rtwedwe Mess heaedwes

^' % , ,

l Vede Mamah l s s Tes Praeesee Complead Mes Pessses IG'SI Repen 8 Spes sisease AR UIRsACEAR - '

  • 8
  • Vaids Mamels AA Cdadetes " ' ' ' '

DSDP A8 Precedwe iOMT)

SQ Paramp Sparesemens uw we n% _ _ _ _

. , ---i R. he.e ,

l--~~-j ---* ,,. . M. ..h....M Q Carreetwo Amen Raww '

l.....j......p'  ;  ;

gre,, Fami 2 0. sows Deus) Fenn 3 (Design Base. Cag)

% Fem 3 (Denian Besn> Symen@ Fein 7 (3yama Mede)

Penn S (Med seemi Fansa (Ops Prosesse)

,e,,n , F.m e a.ed v..) F-= > fr )

g Penn te(PalD wekdesen) Penn te(Wakdeen) l Feelsymaie Report l s.isa s-l

+

  • Tier 1 AFW i . , so ne .m.
  • General j n _ o maw.no q

. ,  ; Schedule i RAJ R*F"No , und giro*'eaf x

_,,,,e,,e Coi.

p R.-

Ci u-

^

Cers, eve A.ase o,e ,eee Me- P e ..

^== ][ I ,

a--e lve - . j , , .

Tas Presseses Canpiesed Ms4 Fedy AFW Repen f Spa dlsehms All UIRa'ACR/AF 8 ' ' ' '

Veas Mamet AN C ' ' ' ' ' ' l DBDP to Fm, ABs,.r Proseks.en ee t.onff) )

NW We5M _ _

. . . , ,----i Revow he.edwe t.....i.....  ;  ;  ; .

Careweve Amen a n a l.....j...... ,i ,n , , , ,n synen Penn 3 (Laeue Baseal Fenn3(DeanBene ConyI see.ery Penn 4 (Dee.sn some syame) Femi 7 (3yman Mede)

Diesroms reem $(Med seresso Pere s (apa Pruseres)

Pain s Form e(Modtere) Fe= 9 frases)

Fem t9 (P&lD wekdeem) Fens le (Wendosa) l p.,ig, gg l 7

1 e

e Selest spees

  • Tier t - RRC i ... e noe n in.

a neme n -a,e n se

  • General Schedule RAI Rag:eene g Le Mod Resee

- ->  ;  ;  ; l Cmwege Aetem jk k I""

Ops basesees Mews heedse l l l Test hee

  • esse Cenplaned Mmb Peshagee l Vandes Maesh l Green Rapet l

Spes $seeme AN UIRWACR/AB ' i a

)l Vande Mamet AD Caledhaene 8 3' 3' 8 8 DHDF A3 hosedoes pntr)

EQ P*4ese Spurseemene

, Fwy WdC , , , , , ,

, , - , , , , , ,----i Rorme hose 6em t.....,.....  ;  ;  ;  ;

Cmweve Asbe l.... 4...... g ;;  ;  ;  ;  ;

syeen Fem 2 0.4 aus Bauel Penn5(DesienBee Coup)

Esasseyy Penn 3 (Deign Basm. Byeong Fenn 7 (Syeen Mede)

Diggeme Farm e 04sd Laenen) Penn8 (Ups Preseese)

Fee l Penn 30(P&JD Wahdeen) Fenn 9 0esung)

  • l y,,,, g,,,,,

Fenn 10 (Wekdessa) g,,,, g um se Geneet Syeens

  • Tier t - EDG 1(edeM A Dels Gewing w General h Deern.m.i., e.ee Schedule KAl Regieene M

t[b Mod Reems

  • c Celes g.8) ' '

yog h = ' '

Mee Canweve Ashut jh II r,e hewedse ,

    • "a="

Mass poseere I Tea Pressesse cenpleasd Meda Puhages l Vande Mench l l i Syeen Rapet 8 s Spec 6sease AN tARa/ACR/AR 8 ' ' ' '

Vener Masset AB Cetadeems 3 ' ' ' '

DBDP AE hessden lontT)

EQ Pesage sporaseteene Fey wedenst ,

.----i j

Reem hasedse i

}.....l.....- '

l Cannes se Asem l.... 4...... p  ; -- ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

Sysse Penn 3 G.asee Bassel Penn 3 (Demon Base. Cany)

Besseery Fenn 3 (Dessun Basse Steend Feem 7 (Sp een Mede)

Dispone Ferm e fMed Lesagi Penn e rups hweese)

Fame R$(P&JD Wakdeeng Feui l Penn 9 (Tseung)

E*"" I W 8kd"*"I l Finef Speem eepen l

-,,e -

8

l Corrective Action Review

+ Corrective Action Review Population

+ DRs (as of February 10) 202

+ ACRs & CRs with system identified: 1 0 HPSI 400 0 AFW 150 '

O EDG 300 0RRC 150

+ ARs average 6 per ACR/CR

+ Non-aligned ARs approximately 5000

+ NRC Sample of Corrective Action Documents 80

== bsannons Corrective Actions

+ RAls outstanding (HPSI and RWST) l RAI# Issued CPJACRs

+1039 2/5/98 50

+1041 2/6/98 50

+1042 2/6/98 50

+1043 2/6/98 50

+1044 2/6/98 50

==

E.wn.ou.

i 1

l 9

i t

, i l

Tier 2 - Status s Design Basis Event Analyses Review and Validation in Progress s 14 Discrepancy Reports issued (Tier 2) s CDCs Approved by NRC: Parsons has incorporated NRC )

CDC comments into Tier 2 l

Gib  !

l i

Tier 2 - Design Basis Event (DBEv) Review Event Category Number of Analysis Vakdation Event Scheduled DBEv's Review Comrecte Resnalysis Completion RC Flow Reduction 2 2 2 -

10-Feb-98  !

Reactidty 6 6 2 1 18-Feb-98 Radioactive Releases 4 4 - - 20-Feb-98 Owrcooling 5 2 -

2 6-Mar-98 Loss of Heat sink 4 4 - 2 20-Mar 98 RC Pressure Boundary 4 3 -

2 3-Apr-98 Containment Analysis 4 4 -

2 17-Apr-98 TOTAL 29 25 4 9 m- bsansows 10

l Tier 2 - DBEv Review For each accident, identify CDCs as Validated /Not Validated Identify "Not Validated" CDCs as:

f e Preliminary Discrepancy Report (NV-DR-xxx) e Previously Identified by NNECo (NV-UIR-xxxx)

{

\

Communicate items requiring resolution to validate the CDCs j e DRs tied to NV status  !

e UIRs, CRs, etc. tied to NV Status e Place Holders (RAls & Revised Analyses)

Feb Tier 2 - Information Needs e Critical RAIs for Accident Mitigation Systems Validation:

17 RAI's Submitted Based on Pilot RAI Process for AMSR Systems

- NNECo Provide Calculations Identified by Parsons - Complete

- NNECo System Engineers Review Cales Listed on RAl's - Complete o identify Superceded and Revised Cales o Identify Additional Cales (Provide to Parsons) -

e 9 Design Basis Events Being Reanalyzed by NNECo o schedule Assumes Design Inputs Available by February 13 o MSI.B/LOCA Containment Reanalysis Design Inputs Received bnanson 11 l

Tier 3 - Process Review Summary e Phase 11 sample selection complete except for vendor manuals e Review completed for following samples:

+ Equivalency Substitutions and Commercial Grade Dedication

+ Equipment / Pans Safety Classification Changes

+ Maintenance Procedure Revisions

+ Operations and Surveillance Pmcedure Revisions

+ Emergency and Abnormal Operations Procedure Revisions

+ Inservice Inspection and Testing Procedure Revisions

+ Temporary Changes / Jumpers, Lifted Leads

+ Setpoint Change Requests e Tier 3 Approximately.75% Complete

-im

F swnsous 1

I Tier 3 Summary Schedule Logic l

ew - u-i, -

w-+ -

se, g , Phase t OtWem 4 R_ewsw 8 emote

=;. .

uT

_ -._,e,

= *==9 '

Phaso 5 m Obten & Rowow Sampee a

' % %"' m r ,m. -

vo s ,

NRC COMMDrTB

  1. 1W "

$MRSCBN5 12 l

1 Tier 3 Inspection Areas - Status

_._ - _ i .._ .._..

so en.,s.acn> e s e e s . m. a ,_

8eemeceson newees 31 31 31 3 uemens osewnee Chmigee 10 19 10 12

_ __ nspens een) 32 32 32 12 Eee*g tmsk Rogued.@NR) 32 32 32 16 Vemfar Teestcol tewmmen TBD Rowew an Med

$@ents tot 191 161 ee i

l 1

1 L -.

Tier 3 Inspection Areas - Status nsayu% ' neer seinandl menned lnedsnad menene

-a m m m m m wmn,-

Ecpatrvy skanulars 32 32 2 22 Fimput mPmpues tartamenrommikananowyn 22 32 32 32 FhpatmPmpus amm es 19e tos ins

  1. 3 M $3AF3SCINS 13

e u

j Tier 3 Inspection Areas - Status

_ _ .4~ -

Papeer tw l C6temed l Reassed Remets

-se. ~e.,es ,. e. W e. ,0 e_ 4 . 4 . -.~_ 4 Aastermal Ops (4 Pepeeses W WWL 10 shenges) 4 4 4 4 Repet in Proyees ECP (4 prece.tes W sert 10 shanges) 4 4 4 4 Repet in Prayees Surwetence (e posessee W non.10 shenges) 4 4 4 4 Repen a proyees Mlereenente (d Pecaeree W suik to shmigesi 4 4 4 4 Repet in Propeau 187 Reseeses (4 pusessee W nut 10 shenges) 4 4 4 4 881 Preneeses (4 Fecessee W aan.10 ehengset 4 4 4 4 A34 secean 30 Repar#tepiece in to 10 4 Tag Chargeer Asger, LMnes Leed, Bypass 2$ 3 25 25 Repet e Propeae ana

brunsONS 1

l 1

Project Schedule Milestones i

(as of February 9,1998) 1 Status Review Completion e Tier 1

< HPSI 2/19/98

<+AFW 5/29/98

< EDG 5/15/98

<HVAC 5/07/98 e Tier 2 4/29/98 e Tier 3 4/8/98 e Final 7/10/98

=

au- (klsansous l

l 14

Potential Schedule Impacts e NNECo Information Processing e Design Basis Availability (AFW, Piping, etc.)

e Program / Topical Area Rework e Availability of 7 Updated Analyses (Tier 2) e Discrepancy Reports

+ Number and Complexity of Discrepancy Reports

+ Anticipated Discrepancy Report Resolution Process

- - - =

6 mn.ou.

Questions & Answers E __~.

15

_ - - _ _ _ - _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20216B917&oldid=3208640"