ML20215K908

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to to Judge Margulies.As Per Canons of Judicial Ethics,Judge Cannot Comment on Pending or Impending Proceeding
ML20215K908
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Shoreham
Issue date: 12/03/1986
From: Prestemon D
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To: Barbash M
CITIZENS TO REPLACE LILCO
Shared Package
ML20213F109 List:
References
NUDOCS 8706250484
Download: ML20215K908 (1)


Text

__

b.

ga ascoy UNITE 0 3T ATES 4

/'

, t

' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i i.,2 f j ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL

'e, j

wassworon. o c. 20sss gg..,.,.. j December 3, 1986

. 1' l

t.

Mr. Maurice Barbash, Chairman Citizens to Replace LILCO 265 West Main Street

.i P.O. Drawer 0 Babylon, New York 11702

Dear Mr. Barbash:

t Your letter of November 26, 1986 to Judge Margulies has been l

j referred to me for reply.

t In carrying out his official responsibilities as an administrative law judge, Judge Margulies is governed by the Canons of Judicial Ethics l

Those Canons direct that promulgated by the American Bar Association.

"A judge should abstain from public comment about a pending or impending Consequently, it would be proceeding....". [ Canon 3. Standard A (6)].

appropriate for Judge Margulies to give his opinion of the Shoreham proceeding only after the case is no longer in litigation.

1 II7 l

avid L. Prestemon l

Legal Counsel

  • l

,l bec: Judge Margulies L

9 i

q i

.hb.'

i

'l o :;

B706250484'B70622 PDR COMMS NRCC

  • j CORRESPONDENCE PDRi i

,