ML20215K908

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to to Judge Margulies.As Per Canons of Judicial Ethics,Judge Cannot Comment on Pending or Impending Proceeding
ML20215K908
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Shoreham
Issue date: 12/03/1986
From: Prestemon D
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To: Barbash M
CITIZENS TO REPLACE LILCO
Shared Package
ML20213F109 List:
References
NUDOCS 8706250484
Download: ML20215K908 (1)


Text

__

b.

4 ga ascoy UNITE 0 3T ATES

/' , t i i. ,2 fj ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL

' 'e, j wassworon. o c. 20sss gg . .,.,. . j December 3, 1986 '

, , . 1' l

t.

Mr. Maurice Barbash, Chairman .

Citizens to Replace LILCO <

265 West Main Street .i '

P.O. Drawer 0 Babylon, New York 11702 <

t

Dear Mr. Barbash:

l Your letter of November 26, 1986 to Judge Margulies has been j t

referred to me for reply.

In carrying out his official responsibilities as an administrative l

law judge, Judge Margulies is governed by the Canons of Judicial Ethics <

promulgated by the American Bar Association. Those Canons direct that "A judge should abstain from public comment about a pendingitor Consequently, impending would be '

proceeding ... ." . [ Canon 3. Standard A (6)].

appropriate for Judge Margulies to give his opinion of the Shoreham  !

proceeding only after the case is no longer in litigation.

1 II7 l

avid L. Prestemon l' Legal Counsel *l

,l bec: Judge Margulies L

l 9

i q i

.hb . '

i

'l o :;

B706250484'B70622 *j PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDRi  !

, i