ML20212J618
| ML20212J618 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/01/1986 |
| From: | Kerr G NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210H056 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-47 NUDOCS 8703090070 | |
| Download: ML20212J618 (33) | |
Text
,
4 f(
i h
Ref: SA/J0L OCT 1 gggg MEMORANDUM FOR: John G. Davis Director, MMSS FROM:
G. Wayne Kerr, Director, OSP
SUBJECT:
DISPOSITION OF NMSS COMEhTS ON DRAFT PROPOSAL FR0!!
ILLINOIS FOR SECTION 274b AGREEMENT Thank you for your staff's in'ormal coments on the sub.iect proposal.
I have attached sumaries of our disposition of the coments (enclnsurce. 3 and 2). We understand that, overall, the staff found the proposal to b' compatible with the flRC progran and nothing in the propostl would preclude a staff recommendation to grant the request. Very shortiv w -
expect to receive the fomel request for a Section 274b Agreement fron Governor Thompson. At that time I will transmit to you for concurrence a proposed Federal Register notice for the request which includes th<.
1 NRC staff assessmant _of the proposal, unp u alsned by G. Wayne Ker$ #
G. Wayne Kerr, Director Office of State Prograns
Enclosures:
As stated Distribution:
SAR R/F Dir R/F KJ0Lubenau Illinois file (fc) w/encls.
DANussbaumer w/encls.
GWKerr, w/encls JHickey,FC,w/encls.
JStarmer, WM, w/ enc 1.
u70accroo70 ts70226 l
PDR FDIA
/
RADERB7-47 PDR 3
W I/
/
Sy A
10kuh./.bh D M. sbaume.r,,
..GW.... rr
.10/.i/.86..,,
J,0/.S/.86..
.10/..M...,8.6..
ascenumreusuwrs
a i
t 6:
NMSS Comments on Illinois Proposal (Other than editorial or typos)
Comment Disposition 330.280(f)(2) - applicant' will Previously discussed with IDNS. The only need to " certify";that he phrase "and subsequently satisfies" will satisfy the requirements was added at OSP and OGC staff request in 10 CFR 32.58,.59 and.102?
to make clear more than certification is-required.
340.2070(b)(1)(a)-wouldbe Follows Suggested State Regulations higher for certain isotopes (SSR)..Th.e cited Part 20 reference than under current Part is not fun'ctional since it 20.205(b)(1)(1) and is not references a section in 10 CFR 71 compatible with proposed Part which has be m deleted.
Proposed 20 limits Part 20 will not be a standard for compatibility until promulgated.
340.4020 - does not require Follows SSR which requires immediate that 30 day written reports reporting of loss or theft of 4
l be submitted as required in licensed material by telephone and 20.402(b).
telegraph.
340. App C - This appendix Previously discussed with IDNS which should be deleted or modified prefers to leave as is. Appendix C is to be at least as restrictive guidance and IDNS will apply limits on as NRC guidelines. Also, a case-by-case basis as appropriate Section 330.320 (d)(1)(B) thru license conditions.
should be reworded to be as restrictive as 340.4090(a).
340 - reporting requirements These are not compatibility items at similar to 20.407 and 20.408 present.
are not required?
350.1020 - does not require Follows SSR.
that sources be secured each time the source is returned to the storage position as 4
specifiedin34.22(a).
i 350.1080(b)-allows Follows SSR.
quarterly inspection and maintenances rather than every 3 months or prior to first SSR use as specified in 34.28(b).
350.2010(d) - only requires Follows SSR. Will reconsnend IDNS annual audits of each include in next revision.
radiographer rather than every 3 months as specified in 34.11(d)(effective 7/16/86).
s i
Comment.
Disposition 350. App A - Does not include Follows SSR.
in it item IV from Part 34.
App. A.
Alsoitems(IV)and(V) are redundant with items in 350.2010.
351.4010 - We strongly suggest OSP will request IDNS to delete the that IL consider deleting the exemption in their next revision and exceptions for H-3, C-14 and S-35 recomend,' as an interim measure, in.this section. As written adding a standard license condition this would allow a field flood re: this in*well-logging licenses.
licensee, who may use multi-curie quantities of H-3 or multi-millicurie quantities of C-14 and S-35 to unknowingly walk away from a contaminated site.
IL should note that this section was deleted in proposed Part 39.
400.110(d) - allows posting of Follows SSR.
notices of violation within 5 days rather than 2 days as required in 19.11(e).
310.100 - IL may want to resolve Follows SSR.
If a State issues a potential conflict between license authorizing lixiscopes for prohibition in 5310.100 against human use, it, in effect, is exempting use of hand-held fluoroscopic the user from the prohibition.
screen and authorization in 5330 (Group VI to use a lixiscope (i.e., a hand-held fluoroscopic-type device).
330.30(c) - does not contain The exemptions were inadvertently exemptions for glassware, omitted in the Illinois regulations.
glass enamel etc. as described IDNS will instruct its staff to not in 10 CFR 40.13(c)(2)(iii)&
cite individuals possessing source (iv).
material covered by these sections of 10 CFR until the Illinois regulations are amended.
330.210 - does not prohibit Human use is defined in Illinois Part 310 and authorized onl human use of source material 330.260(a), (y) pursuant to b & (c).
as does 10 CFR 40.22(c).
Sections 330.220(d)(3)(C) - Is not Follows SSR.
equivalent to 10 CFR 31.5(c)(3) in that it does not require that leak tests and tests of on-off mechanism and indicators be done 1) in
Coment Disposition accordance with manufacturer's instructions or 2) by licensee specifically authorize by NRC or Agreement State to perform those tests.
330.220(d)(3)-doesnot Follows SSR. Note: 10 CFR 110, prohibit export as does 10 CFR
" Export and Import of Nuclear 31.5(c)(7).
Equipment and Material" applies to persons in Agreement States.
330.220(e)-doesnotprohibit Follows SSR. Note: 10 CFR 110, '
import and export as does 10
" Export and Import of Nuclear CFR 31.7(c) & (d).
Equipment and Materfal" applies to persons,in Agreement States.
330.220(g) - does not prohibit Follows SSR. Note: 10 CFR 110, export / import, see 10 CFR
" Export and fmport of Nuclear 31.8(e) snd 70.19(d) for Equipment and Material" applies comparison.
to persons in Agreement States.
330.220(1)- the asterisk Follows SSR. We*will pursue this with references FDA regulation for the appropriate SSR subcomittee.
"New Drugs" in connection with in-vitro test kits. But, FDA regulations define in-vitro test kits as medical devices, l
not drugs; thus footnote is inaccurate.
330.260(C)(2)(B)(ii)-There Discussed with IDNS staff.
Illinois seems to be no Illinois will include this in the next regulation equivalent to 10 amendment of their regulation.
In CFR30.34(g). Thus, Illinois the interim Illinois licensing staff broad licensees and nuclear will use a standard license condition pharmacies are not required by equivalent to 10 CFR 30.34(g). When regulation to test generator the Agreement becomes effective eluates for Mo-99.
Illinois licensing staff will review broad medical and nuclear pharmacy licenses for the need for such a condition.
330 Group II: change fluorine Follows SSR.
18 solution to " injection;"
solution implies for oral administration, while injection implies suitability for injection. NDA for this product is for " injection."
i
}
t 4,
Coment Disposition
. 340.2030(c)(6) - is it Yes, No.
appropriate for Illinois regulations to reference an NRC requirement? Should not Illinois regulations be a
" stand alone" document?
350.1080(b)-is.notequivalent Follows SSR.
to 10 CFR 34.28(b) in that inspection is not required
- before 1st use of new equipment.
350.2020 - is not equivalent Follows'SSR.
to 10 CFR 34.32(1) in'that operating / emergency procedures are not required to provide for reporting of defects (i.e.,
Part 21 problems).
370.30(b)(3)-appearsto Follows SSR.
have some words missing.
370.40(d) - does not specify Follows SSR.
how full calibration of teletherapy is to be done; see 10 CFR 35.21.
370.40(g)(2) - does not give Follows SSR.
Illinois any flexibility.
l Says person will be approved if certain infomation is supplied. Appears to require approval even if person i
perfomed full calibration l
for spot checks incorrectly.
i Vol. I: Application is unclear OSP has requested IDNS specifically as to Illinois internal address this issue in the fomal l
I mechanism for developing and application.
1-regulating a low-level waste l
site. For instance, will the l
process be similar to that of Texas, California or some other process? Will IDNS have.all three roles of developer, landlord, and regulatory; or j
will some separation between i
these roles be instituted?
l l
l l
- + =
-,,-,--r-
+----
w-. - -,., - -. -,..-,
m
,,m.v.-.-
mm
,~---, -, - -
.-.,..or--.
wm--.-------,mc r-i, r
3.
5-i Comment Disposition Vol. I: The section on the The IDNS proposal discusses the Sheffield Low-Level Waste statutory and regulatory framework Disposal Facility lacks detail and staff and other necessary on closure and post-closure resources for closure and post-closure activities. For instance, no regulatory activities. These are infomation is given on: time adequate. The NRC Policy Statement-table for State's takeover; for applicant Agreement States does what group will have which not call for additional detail in responsibilities during what this respect. Provided the Comission time period; what specific approves the request, the Sheffield activities that can be expected; license will be transferred to or plans for the legal Illinois on the effectiv'e date of the proceedings in the Thirteen Agreement. Decisions on legal Judicial Circuit of Bureau proceedings from tha't point on will County, Illinois.
be Illinois. The IDNS application notes thati the Office of Environmental Safety will be responsible for regulating tfits facility. Resources from other IDNS Offices will be available as needed.
Vols. II & III: Nowhere in the 241-10 also calls for at least one applicable Illinois statutes, or public hearing in each comunity in supporting regulations, is selected for site characterization there a specific requirement for and to hold others at comunities an Environmental Report or request.
Illinois regulations address Environmental Impact Statement the matters of environmental reports in support of activities related and comencement of constructions for comercial waste disposal by(land 330.250(b)1)&
to low-level waste disposal.
burial in Section Illinois Rev. Statute-1983, Supp. Ch. Illi p. 241-10 d does l
require an Environmental Impact Study of proposed LLW sites.
Vols I & II:
Illinois enabling IDNS has comitted to enter into MOU's legislation (Illinois Rev.
with other State agencies as needed Statute 1983, ch. 127 p.63b17)
(p.31 of Vol. 1).
appears to give IDNS adequate authority to carry out its low-level waste management responsibilities. The legislation gives IDNS the primary responsibility for State waste management activities, some of which will be carried out "in cooperation with" other State agencies such as the Geologic and Water Resources Surveys. Some mechanism, Memoranda of Understanding, should be established between IDNS and the other agencies to outline the procedural steps for coordination of waste management activities.
i s
s Coment Disposition Vol. II:
Illinois. Rev. Statute No compatibility problem is causeri 1983, ch. Illi par. 230.6 by this.
1 requires that land used for
= waste disposal.be dedicated in perpetuity to this purpose.
This requirement.gces beyond the 10 CFR Part 61 requirement for
-)
100 year institutional control.
It is unclear as to wh' ther IDNS' The NRC Policy Statewht does not e
or EPA or both would have require the matter ofjaixed waste authority over the disposal of be specifically addrestad. 0GC mixed waste. The State reviewed the IDNS legislation Environment Protec' tion Act and reg'ulations fo'r LLW and concluded (Illinois Rev. Statutd 1983, thet' adequate authority exists to.
-par. 1004, 1025a-1025b, regulate the-land discosal of 1030-1045)_seems to give IEPA radioactive waste. JaC staff will,'
authority over LLW sites with keep IDNS informed, nonitor mixed waste. However, the
- developments and otherwise work with enabling legislatien (Illinois IDNS, as we do witn the, other LLW Rev. Statute 1983, ch.127 par.
disposal site States, on-the i
63b17) transfers some of IEPA's issue of mixed waste.,
' 4 powers to IDNS, particularly
~
relating to power plants and reprocessing plants. OELD j
should ascertain whather or not J
l this transfef of' powers also applies to LLW sites.
Vol. I: The staffing list as We will ask IDNS to clarify this.
J provided on p.27-of the J
application is unclear as to how many full time positions are in each field versus past time positions.
Vol 1: DELDeshould ascertain if As noted eerlita this matter is the application should provide covered by the NRC Policy Statement for revision of State for revi wing! Agreement State programs regulations as necessary if NRC U.e., past Agreement reviews),
changes its regulations.
OGC has found the Il regulatory framework to be rec?ptable.
I k ^
s a-4 g
-,,, + - + -,.
,,w r
c.-os,
.,-r.
rw.-,.. - - - - - -.
,,.-.--4,, -,.
- - -. - + - - - - - -
.--e
_=
=
)
S t;.
,j y
y n- '
3>
?
y 6
p.
R.
D'sposition i
Coment 1
.Vol. II:
Illinois regulations for land disposal of (Low-level) q Radioactive Waste (32 Illinois
~
i Adm. Code 601) and portions of y
the Standards.for-Prctection Against Radiation 932 Illinois Adm. Codo 340)' are gen at ally y
compatible with the intent of 10 CFR 61 and 10atFR 20.
In reviewing thc;1111nois regulations the'following discrepancies with NRC regulations were noted.
Section 601.20 - Definitions of
" License" and "Per' son" are defined
" license," "ne'ar surface disposal in Part 310. " General Provisions."
facility" and " person" were not Illinois' handling of the definitions providea. The definition of " land concerning lan'd disposal facilities disposal ficility" is different are dictated by Illinois legislature fron' the definition 'in 10 CFR intent to prohibit " shallow land s
61.2.
Sec. tion 601.50 doe 3 not disposal." Requirements for an require that an Environmental Environmental Report for comercial Report accompany the license land burial of radwaste are contained application.
in Section 330.250(b).
The word " Department" should be Defined in Part 310.
defined sirde it is used through-
/
'out the h 3ulation to mean the
^~
Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (10#5).
part 601 does not contain sn 10 CFR 61.16 concerns fomula ec;uivalent,to 10 CFR 61.16 quantities of SNM and is not 4
co(ering si:ecial nuclear material. applicable to Illinois program.
Sec.s 601.110(::):, 601.110(c)
We believe 601.190 follows 10 CFR should not. tie releases 61.41.
to public. water supply to 601.190. Standards for water l
supply are set by EPA and are more restrictive than requirements in 601.190.
i
'Section 601.120 is significantly Section 601.120 follows draft SSR different than'its 10 CFR 61 language.
10 CFR 61.25 can he c
i 1
equivalent (61.24). Also, handled as internal IDNS licensing Illinois proposes no equivalent policy.
10 CFR 61.26 is covared in to 61.25 or 61.26.
Illinois Part 330, " Licensing of t
s Radioactive Materials."
(
l, Section 601.230 lists two siting There is no problem caused by this.
criteria [(1) and (m)] required 4 -
by State law that are in addition
~
. to those listed in 10 CFR 61.50.
s
- D u
.L _ 4 _ _,..
_,,___,______,I____..
^
l A.
Comment Disposition Section 601.250(1)- this clause We interpreted section 601.250(1)to seems to imply a willingness to mean what is says.-
dispose of greater than Class C waste.
Comments on Part 340 related to No comment.
/ '
Waste Management: Part 340 contains requirements for waste classification and waste form which are consistent with requirements in 61.55 and 51.56.
< It also contains Manifest Reporting requirements similar to those in 10 CFR 20.311.
li Section 340.3070 is silent on No connent.
greater than Class C waste.
~
i h
\\
s 0
T
n NMSS Comments on Illinois Proposal of Editorial of Typo Nature The following Coments will be brought to IDNS staff's attention by letter with a request to address them at next revision of regulations or administrative 1y.
330.270(a)(1)-change" byproduct"toradioactive."
330.280(e)(2)-refersapplicanttothereportingrequirementsin10 CFR 32.56 - Instead should require reporting to Illinois.
330.270(e)(1)(B) - allows possession of devices containing up to 100,330 C1, while 10 CFR 33 only allows up to 100,000 curies.
330. App B - certain 1'sotopes exempt quantities are allowed to be up to 1330 uCi while 10 CFR 30.71 limit is 1000 uCi.
330. App D - certain isotope limits exceed those specified in 10 CFR 33.100.
Section 601.110 c & d.
The phrase, "... including equipment, facilities and procedures"... should be in parentheses to avoid ambiguity.
340 - The table of contents for Part 340 refers to an Illustration A which was not included.
350.1010 - Typo.
Vol. I: p. 56 - typo.
Vol. III 310.10 - typo 310.20 typo in definition of " rem."
l 330.220(g)(4) - several words appear to be missing.
1 330.220(h)(4) - need to close quotation marks.
330.220(j) - correct format.
330.200(d)(1)(E) - recommend consistency in terminology - e.g.,
radiographers' assistants (note placement of apostrophe and "s" for plurals).
330.280(d) - typo.
330.P.80(h)(5) - typo.
330.400(c)-typo.
330 Group I - typo.
330 Group III - typo.
340.1030(a)(2) - correct address; there is no Office of Standards Development at NRC any more.
340.2020(e)(1)-typo.
340.2030 - Illustration A, mentioned in 340.20 is missing from the document. Illustration A is the radiation symbol.
370.30(a)(2) - typo.
370.30(b)(1)-numbermissingintext Performance Objectives and Technical General Note on part 601:
Requirements are referred to generically throughout the Part, the sections containing these elements should be specifically labelled
" Performance Objectives" and " Technical Requir,ements."-
Section'340: - Either definitions for terms such as " stability" and
~
" chelating agent" should be provided in Section 340, or reference should 1
be made to Section 601 and definitions included there.
e
=
e l
l
p> %,
UNITED 8TATES
[*
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
f VM f f/tc n
,~,, c a
k '? ' d,,
a, & ' & !.
d do ' as
,, e -l.,,.., a, AL, sC -
/*'^. y
.c.
- i,
J h
['
k b-Jj
,.m' % *<'. 'L ': - [
s' ' ne 'c' t li
., ~*
W 4
/4 R-f?33 A
/sa, gp L &~/ e~.g n.riu l
m.
@ 47 > ]ll
?
[Lw ~.w.~i.;
j $ bMM MM14cdicw ew B6J 200 (CL)(I) - c L-
layo M -lo
imdic as. - -
330*k?O(L){'L)-
c y&J -lo 4Le cod n, LAA su_
ds
/0C F2 3 2 S G
.M c d :1 "~-
A m y t.
S g % _1. L 3 3C. Mo (FM2)
-- Cypid.d wl.if c~.Lg ~ l de "c.d C/ L, N r u y
- , ~'. ~ t 1 L d L w l.L bcd-G
+
, ic y ?
tbcce n.ss,.s<1
~
~
3 30. 'MC (.O C ) (IB) '-- aA% a rp%v. v.s g d t _..
oA~
4-lo o, :n c CC, w at n o /i a '
2_p ont t ed.m.s A-p -46
/0 C, co e 6%
3 3 0. @ P 3
c.t e u aJqw.o cmq
$ mm A."
d AA u
yn
- I n c x & c_ uu.
m Io L H2 3Cs,71 M-~ t a
iGOO.A> (L 3 ?o. k?P 'b /& '&p p u eul. % a psi a mc etz. 3 3. io o t,t%d HIL 3'-/0,'2o'26 ( 0O)(A) e a d. k L.') 6 [cn ceaur e 3 -4..
7
~ fL as ca.ru.d Pd20. c os (UOyc ) :.-L
~
aw u.gsur d p.a mdaca.x
( ",'
3'/O.-/o10
- i3 e-L.s m 4
/ t c ) u ~ u. T k J v, e @...s s
yt.4 L
mL'JIL L s
qu r;.4o',tCb)
- S S Il 3'/ 0, A Ph (_ - N cp&
s kd 2 b dddd I 7
emc y d_.1 +e h_r._ o-t.
P
- -# ce o- /u_4./Mc A at-405 %, Cv3 pdc C $tu_ h M-do, M a n 3 3 6. Mc v [... < ~ (d )(' i )( 13) s u J.
k A_a.a,_ Lc J 4e M v,
- J itL c h _e em 3H 6. '-16 9 o (cL).
,9 3 '/ O q.,c d ig /u_-) ui - 4 h ale.-( *-
?e Oc-c cl
'l G
'I o "6 c._.c_,wc,3 /u ) w u_d ?
v# #
&g.
- l* *
- 3 (O l % L L.-u_ e.j c w,-i s
.f a DM %'C rp.
-4c.
<w
_L.) L w a n.._>{% c,
A a I,~e t, ea c.A <.>
twc_Lud_td 3 56,/101o i 3pc 3Eo./O'JD-bcm m c>=f 6 4*d s cm c.'o M
3 Ltc.u, J & 4 L -1Le 3~u 4
~dm d
% L
&~ y ufccm u
spQead a 3 '/. '1 L Gt).
SS 3 3~C. 16%D [b) cll u n <joeJvi;
.pu ch c <.
c~cl c-c,: h p~ a k /c-J i n, /~: d k u -t k w..
.2 m ed La ez
.. - "t
/pg)/ e n 6 V..2 t (1)
' ' s ~.c e,
(v.
3 3 56. ';10 / o (' J. )
cw % %.cu.u cun >uucJ & L b; t> -;
L~L
.na$lecya 4 ut
+ rIL w u Tl~.v.~ s v u.~
L b mc.~ dis.4 s
Ajar is c/ 4 2 c/. / / (J.)
(.c.p x 7/'16/t 6,), w SS'l M3v iin 3 sa APPA - k ~s as k a IE
^~
0ho % f31de-ciO!.) u n k b 4 wvn 45'l S c+.%
3 so. u i c m,.
3 5).Lt6iO
'LQ. t -J (L
ej -rkg 3 y
~,
c va u k L3 d w HL M cup =h e ~2 fei ll 5
( I'I,
d S35 16
/am cm,
j c m.no.s 7 E.
ms fwIL flo-eaAw--x,+.
ea k alw c
~m wu ~ C,. y w
e4 H 2
.. v.. a a Cnte-ssss +
s iL W w n w& w, uj u,%Ag A_
/4_ m < a_.
. s s...,
]. L ma d # n.st h tv o_.,4 c..
- u. c MJ a pyxm a Aa 3 s.
L/DO. II O ( dh - Jilwh p6 y f n d i Q v i o l d '-
q' h s 49 ac,s L h 2 Asp u m,
..J V
14.
II (L),
$ y/L
f//6lfg, A/O 765lCOMMCA/750 A l Z u A/0/5 Sf.48shrr&
E e %a.& -42A.ud-llO4. Z : y 42 -- Gpo WU" I/ot. 2r k
~
33to.to p
g 3 io. ao po - p y % -
d A & 3/0.too 739 pwrt h Amin fr-b.a.nd dayWeL i
b^
42Losts m f.Blo.tet s7 w p
S4) "
,, is
- A.u L +f M " Add
,4c u t,v
& ^^ f 330 hQ" EI)4 g
G wu tu fucq (-1'.r. a h. s& '6M
~W f.330.f0
] ~ dR,o (56/- W J <&omy'fLawf p6U fodLMA^t, f LtuumLlJ1L O--
d" k M tLkd ev /0 OSP 40. /.9(e.)(a)(4)/(fc.
)
/Un4U uJJX kn m
[.33D c
d pt~
bgpl CIJ m.ua is G wVo a
to Y fQf;b W(c>Lf-dRA (M-h W M W n<a Y s,ofg.
W /ntewul os am to 99e es,4 w
e pao.aaop](s)(c)- mVwy /seweesygd s
a.x u r >
w j.u.je., hab ( >6atr ydu dm h era gsnu 5Y f.wLua.wus.tde al' E ) X L Q M MCt~v.uUw n
$h kuLL Wd d uAA6-ty4
/lf6ev u.L 1 L
^d M.
a,.n U
b a e m a s (e) (7) ssi a c. u s (g - n w y m y w m f.33o. n o (g)(4)/o u=
io em si. m) a s,.a s s a Jo
% al m p - y p w t N
1330. 220 (g) - kmW)Mp'76.d&Qgor/~pg p to d6e 8A'Ple f
SSil-f536. Ape (A)(f/ g mW 2xta /ir-pso. aaoy) d-wd fomsw w
/upinp wLs/n w
savauxou p n m 0 As I ^s. -1 W 8it-J "r p n, f/)/Aspw dafit.
uc wm n nwu k, W d*P: %f Ask
% n MmCtx.
4 h ND c180fCNh)( fi$)
4
- /%nws u 2s f n n$
W rn~
wg
& J m esuw A br y<
mf A-77.
- 4. m aac(,-) / w p ua s
7 d) 1 33s.as o %(i)(egnw mp.
~n9 -
,.,. ww&&
f
~ '"
/
(c)>9,9,,/'
s a o. a r o no. a
-fype 3Do -
330 1-ms j
336 7:
d'jw d.a w
~
Aa
- m-q S/2.
m ea maau;~
./
N M
w. A!d#
AsJ
.% y d w.
L
?%
y.f 38 2 77 _
e f 346, /oBB (a aAds.Lu_;,tAsu. a su da dualymc W
g a vo, o n @ l d -
4-l BVo a63o
/
m A, m uasu u t 4 3vo.ae nmy* W4 n
. pa n e s
af M.
~
f 3A. aoss(e a-
/um,A w osee UAJA*LW Mif f aJ L%e i
p h A c
- p q d a u
Anwva ?
/0 l'f72-tj 350, /0C0 [4]
p M h f39' 224).in.
S5k #^# j " " " M /ut""A
& 3A do M - n @Q /m y /uur w/c gpe_.
w 4y
- 34. M (4) n Md sfwtwy,/
'.u <
yW um 1sn.nsm 4,oh D Y p.D n 370.as(+ op) m ar a n y e
~f 76. S o
)(3 gj.ug,6 & y m n 3
ssC m y <>
E h b ]d' Y0 fl ' AMs W
& Q esJc&tarug 5
y Abskyy a A M btu n
/d OFL 3S's/
Y [ 3 10 d6 [f ) fD) % " k: &n & $p
- 41 4 M ftaM-1 k,
n n
y A
L S DL.A-u f 't h d U ^ & n / M ad ew>uizw %ep+
n A4 C
,. ~
. +pw%e..
- 7 e,
MSS rf RFimwp
~0
%Mw f
h 1-JBunting
.r
.g 4
S'i ; ;4 "
- b 'n 4 y
JStarmer
?b!
q A v..
JShaffner (unari."i:iki 55/ue/f9) 4lMee44*
h1 XDragonette
- yM5 in usatenevr;-OSP NEMORANotM FOR:
icensing Branch Materials uel Cycle and Material Safety f g g
.g M
Division of f(af' f R. John Starse Section Leader 74 P o f > /c, -
Uranium FROM:
Low-Level Waste r
Recovery Projec Branch p
s fj/
JP, Division of Waste nagement f
t T. M [.<."X Ma REVIEW OF WASTE MA"1AG NT SECTIONS
SUBJECT:
OF THE APPLICATION FORREEMENT STATE l
7<. -
STATUS BY THE STATE OFLIN0IS
.rg"y :s._
g 5
N&T MM Tokn donW" 9 gg g h,,
- 85).the " " '
Per your request to Jc-L. ' ; (note dated 1tWLtdt
/.'cd%
nue:t
,h, t
ich rela b
staff has reviewed the sections of the p a...,, - -. _ _ _.
?*
As part of the review, staff memboos also revi h
low-level waste management.
i tained 16 7
appropriate statutes contained in Volume Il and draft regulat ons con f.
e Volume III.
of t*Y Y>
tu h NRC Overall, we find the proposed Illinois program.to be compatible with t osin p,s nt of low-level waste and could find nothing in the
,, 4
ld preclude the granting of agreement state status based on program 3-
~
appli the low-level waste management program.
a ina onse to We offer the following observations for your consideration in your resp the Office of State Programs.
+-
sh OFC :WMLU k
1
..... 3
- JStarmer NAME :J DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
vW~
. ; T
~
- ~;_.w
....~;;.;..
L--
y,.
. l.b CA dr1.. IS. UWC<hAr~-Q3...f0..
/$7h/1A..!.4
/*
dn 4j,.
Mn
/,w/eelmsq.idl 1 4,)a n a i s.sa% k_ w y& si,,,:a<.y.s -i&J A r l...,..:6.3on..ofM p.-o*u. ?
W.lR EaNS kW al!fks.
/ad4d, and. g aL. y a-u>u s n -
l
.o? A alopY N
-sk re41_h..ud,v d ?
sqsntion
- en a s a.~..,s. ska a sad s h M W h %.
w 1%;lfy kcAs Ma; /
E c,hd.
Y.
g i5 yru, & i 4 he Mb.!d-T$a^u'
'1 l ~
u.
~
l
.9 h 4 Q,,,,,)A;/.vys s m SEA-ph,)%cd.\\
t M.
. A <,+,e a s m k e w a ;._ v,9,8 4 M b i.f....
s..& An 7
f.y.
& t..,c, w ;,
i., S. e v.:: ~:+
J A n.a 4.1 % m.--.-.
c c:
s.
\\r
/
_.1..
,/
e b
o o,
a ee - e e e
,g.e
.e e
6 eru.a.=
' q 9
P mm M
---e gm w.,
e95.
eg.
..h-M*6+ e D
- O
p m-s -.
409.14 9
-}-
a-c..
the applicable Illinois statutes, or in supporting Sy.tc0 g
regulations, is there a specific requirement for an Environmental 6I,/
l
- ps%.h Report.or Environmental Iepect Statement in support of activities yL-"'
related to low-level waste disposal. IllinoisRev;.. Statute 1984, F y# b z
'^ 3 '
- I l Supp. ca.111% p. 241-10 d does require an Environmental Iepact Study P..
g-of proposed LLW sites.
t e
t.
- iV. a a.
Illinoisenablinglegislation(IllinoisRev. Statute 1983[i.Ych.122pf414+.
)
63b17)appearstogiveIDMSadequateauthority't'sIa its -
low-level waste management responsib(11 ties ~.7 The k f h gi.
i k,fi IDNS the prime responsibility for, s
,g w
- p y sw m
- *LL 4 management activities, some of which will be carrisd out.by o her'
' ~>
1 hd** N d!q c Q W4t-4aw%*% [:-
^
a as & do/
- 4. -
P". h.h._ M FM iubj - ['
--'tia-a' state agencies #
W
- ,6 t
4 A
M r+;,7;+riate thet y randa o Understandingbeeagl had between
- s. 3 gd5 IDNS and the other agencies utline the procedural steps for alwusspf ~',
1 r
~
~
's.
W coordinatio7of waste management activities.
6 I,
4
/j.
9 Sf.5
., disposal be dedicated in perpetuity to thise. purpose. This N
3
.m. Rev. Stato.1983, ch. iils par. 230.s r.quir. that iana used C.
n
.f y..
.v 3
'.4 s t goes beyond the 10 CFR Part 61 requirement for 100 year s
.. ~
institutional control.
?
3 C
w n ;y;. p -
a&
.nw We.
OFC :WMLU kj
- WMLU NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
g.e 409014/JAS 29 h+p 2.
m y
J lu
(
ar'as to whether IDMS o PA or both would have authority over the disposal of mixed waste. The State Environment Protection
+%
Act'(Illinois Rev. Statute 1983, par. 1004, 1025a-1025b, 1030-1045).
seems to give IEPA authority over LLW sites with mixed wasta.
However, the enabling legislation (Illinois Rev. Statute 1983, ch.
127 par. 63b17) transfers some of IEPA's powers to IDMS, particularly relating to power plants and reprocessing plants. iOELD sheehhi# Ok
(
9 s ub w
ascertain whether or not this transfer of powers also. app ie?
i
~, g 3T)h. x5M fSttp~
rg, sites.
v gA. w ~
l,.
+., W
.u.
F-y Within DNS the Office of Environmental Safety has progt',,
L responsib ity for all waste management activities. Mafo N,'t)iti 4
.,3 y
f include:
\\
.If
(
7 er
, t f
O' a)
Oversight of omnissioning.of radioactive waste disposal i
)-{ #
3 4
y sites.
8'j Y,
0 e' /
b)
Developing siting er eria for new facilities.
{> i Developing criteria for aste treatment and storage, i
h
(
- .e r
odingcriteriaforco ractor selection..
loping criteria for liabi ' y compensation.
j 4'
i).- Environmental Surveillance.
.,; {
^
d
- W
, ' GV p.
.ifg qda3g..
. af,.,
i f :*.'
c
(
OFC :WLU kj
- WLU t;,
NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
w,-
409.14/JAS/
- [-
p 7
1 p,-
ity for these activities is divided among three divisions within'the ice. There is an implied interrelationship among these l
divisions to car t the major activities, as the professional disciplines necessary carry out the activities are not represented in each of the divisions.
application should be expanded
~
somewhat to explain the coordina, on and interaction among the m.
divisions which will be necessary to complish major;p' ' u.
ic.
g '.
R'M : * ;r ep;.4 }
activities, se
$3 v<
c^'
k, 4
'st-p sb/
27 h
.4 *
. % ert s
+-
t f
)
It w s no d that S plans to ncrea staf9emv
.3/4 2
.. g hy.
'. Y. 's H
er, they o not indicate that pfen
- Ni
- en.5s$
... T:
- 4 M
\\,...
..s? - y.5^' '
7 sing-g+
i a 1 discip ine nece sary for wasta facili ot.slt sa.,, f
- J s
ma ter is engin ers tra sportation s pecialis and.
logists).
3%'-
VV s c, cos The app cation oul c1 rify the
, tent to ch th6s etise g %
g n..,
- c..
d,
- ith ther state 3
wi 1 be a allable, ither con et or agreene w
age for the lice rocess.
V L'h J l5] stdh list <s WM or f*g 'D 5 W *ff
.D " ""'N y
q3 to go,, haw 511 %r4 pos;t %..e. g o d. 4I M ;j H.r n s pa.4 Vi
-lic=Han _ <hauld nrovide for revision of state regulations as
,Kurk id
? **,'
r.
s its regulations.
y,~.
c-..
3.c.-
9 %)
Illinois regulations for land disposal of (Low-level) Radioactive Waste (32 Illinois Adm. Code 601) and portions of the Standards for
~
w c,-
. z gfy.y f*Qy 0FC :WMLU kj
- WMLU
- s NAME
- JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
M' 409.14/JAS/ /08/29
- k. -
- ~
n Against Radiation (32 Illinois Adm. Code 340) are l
generally compatible with the intent of 10 CFR feet 61 and 10 CFR
,Peet 20.
In reviewing the Illinois regulations the following discrepencies with NRC regulations were noted.
p,"
D If 3p s
33
/
O
/
/
Section 601.27efinitions of " license", "near surface disposal A
po facility" and " person were not 'provided. The definitionist." land g' 90
.. lpm (disposalfacility"isdifferentfromthedefinitionin
~
~4 M'
L 0
yP Section 601.5 does not require that an Environmental R the license application.
cM * '5 W.,
[4 $,*
'7 n
..Y 3;O
- - - - - - ~ ~ -
p...
'The word '[partment" should be defined since it is used throoghout the regulation to mean the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
~/
Part 601 does not contain an equivalent to 10 CFR 61.16 covering special nuclear material.
sd err /Mksw " j, tly hk,,
tt (hil.1[c&d.
Thephrasel
'hncludingequipment, d '!' W h
i fes and procedures... p should be in parentheses to avoid m
g 3.
c) should not tie releases to public water ambiguity.
Furthe}601.1 OFC :WMLU kj
- WMLU NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
m-2.t y y mw.wm y.,r 409.14/JAS/2/08/29
,i, Standards for water supply 'are set by EPA and are M
4 // # g,f, el l 0
ggA 1
more restrictive than requirements in 601.19 i
A f-()
t Section 601.12 shoulu & +ha FederaD+-tit. -i Jiich T m g
r h
H?
s r.u. i., athrfty ta tk- :*de.
3 rs I0c.#
I Section 601.1his significantly different than its WWpt 61 equivalent k,
k no jf c c./ ; y
,D M
1
/
'u (61.24). Also, Illinois proposes no equivalent to 61.25 or 61.26.hz-sy!
. )3
'\\- ) x c
f
,,J h innlientions of +kie thould he terutini-f by M W,,@p'., t '
l-t t)
.n rx
);,
- x d,
e y
f 0
A't1
.9 E
ion 601. 3 con,in, no i,
,,,,ije.
f S
I A04 hN N
M after th ens on
\\
O Secti n 601.14 a) ontains a subtle word change la d to ackfill r
O c) R N
L (s
Best 61.
a)2)) which may
/ not be n intenti 1 attempt incoipor te above tround spos1.
A L
[
Section 601.1h does not specify the beginning of the post cicsure um h
, i t --
t;. th:t th; vv.ervation period continue
. net _
== tran<far.
It al=a ;;;;ii.. snes closum
.i. be e
sw.
4.0 i s ahaiGr.
U?? 10 CE" 1161M db I
y'.wiu ps-iur s
jI y '..m V-
[ AAi t--
1 L
r h
I'
0FC :WLU kJ
- WLU g
NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/' /
- 85/ /
,y...
y,....
409.14/JAS/
29 O
r 3-
- . v.;
.u
-;i
- ~ s
}.
)Q
..- Q
.- ~
y r
5 3
e
'i.;. site w.er.
(61.30) d owlm) k Section601.2[3Mj two-edditianal siting criterig required by
.t w a.
f @
,_g"
- 0.,fE4 4/. 60 state lag (6
0 W-
' iv.
l 0
.w. "
3.,"
25,, co tains amb % rding'regardi..,?-'
Sec on
{
'l'.*
C C waste.
(61.52 a)2))
~
ggg
..t..
]:'
Oj
. x..
Section 601.2g't) tr.. -N.y" &W h 2._,
^
is..
clause seems to imply a willingness to dispose of T."
C waste.
d ts W" "e *L) } }-
. 9 4
0 et n 601.31 2). The last t sentinces of th p regrap w
beginning wit "These assuranc shall te based
..N" s Id be
'U k
moved ut the margi as y apply to 01.31 i and a)2).
O d
tion 60 31 f).
is sugg ted that he ph se ".
the license b
- \\
tran er d to the site own " be added to last Th e
. k?/,
t'
,l..
General Note on Part 601:
p;w..v 5
feb
[a*N haft
&.fAf,
' * f. l '
y;w..
OFC :WMLU kj
- WLU w,
NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
,,.s....,.
., 4. a.,
l 409.14/JAS/85/08/29' s
~
f?
'g
+
e vuance Otdoctives and Technical Requirements are referred l
to generically throughout the Part, the sections containing these elements should be specifically labelled " Performance Objectives" and
" Technical Requirements".
,:'j[: i 4 ;ty:a CommentsonPart340relatedtoWasteManagementi.;.,
i.:.*.
g c4.. p,...s.f g Part 340 contains requirements for wasta classification E
i form which are consistent with requirements _in.6h p a
e-i also contains Manifest Reporting requiremeh 11 t,
~
i CFR 20.311.
.:. ?. 7,,.
2,.,M, et..,.M.Wi; v
v,g.
ests :
~G.
Section 340.30?pis silent on greater than Class C w.aste..
.g m;y.
M >-
These comments are taken from a memorandum from.S.lThemes, WPC to ykJ
(
Jim Shaffner, WLU dated 08/28/85 and should be c idered a
g, preliminary pending review by Mary Jo Seeman, WPC.s a
[N"k 10 t-
~
,.g. c -
y.3 g.,
v!
305b)2).
he rd "s ity" s fi in Part
$. s.:
}
ific r nee made finit
't Part 601.
zg. -f.
S 1th Part
'001.25 &
pp * *
- Gli%, gl'
.w OFC :WLU kJ
- WLU NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
~
409.14/JAS
--08/29
-l$ -
r.>
t "tz.
a a) t gi a practid 1 ljait for de ining the presence o e
q dsasdoes6).
a)3).
tion 340 a)7:
s not aution not the sal of i
y f *(j p
ics to a xte tha t Pa t d i (41, a)6
., A'[so j
4 i;e is p.#
"py her 1 shoul be de 4 d in P 4 340.
o
- 5hb'n.3 e
[
4 *. A Section340.30b)2) s the same thi a
.308 aM Hi W
.:[
r al caus e
llow for 0 al et qui.
- w4
.,2.~f **;:.l.'.
S Sect
- - t... : m.
\\
ti Je)
- Several sahifes reporting requi nts are,
3 e
ul Numerical es tcI ic 1
ans should be f
r NA DWuJmm If you have stions about the above comments, please cal 3TE"Sheffner, Proj d"
"h. lps 5 4u wramiad&M," h"Y" 2
h k & Ja Q *n G o l c d ch b 'M b 4 3 l N ?
R. John Starmer, Section Lander
& I ':M p; h
"~~
4 OFC :WMLU kj
- WMLU NAME :JShaffner
- JStarmer DATE :85/ /
- 85/ /
--w--w ng, uv,
- -m, g
-. v.9 =..
6'.
409.14/JAS/85/
-A
^
6
'V Low-Level Waste and Uranium Recovery Projects Branch i,
Division of Wasta Management
.=yt h
. 8 ti, t
- *g >. y.
y
- ., 7W ~,w. 4...,L].,
~~;
g.
- y.-r.19.r.k,'.,
V.
e:
w.
.. - 9 4 w
. r.... it;L ~ - *., :p.
e5:
i.
6 u
.c. [,, ' l.,pg,
N
- 18 %..
s.-
.h
\\
p -.
r-
~
i rg e
e
- y::
M,,
f, c,
t.,
2.,
L P'
r-p.x p
um i,
.,,. g..,.a.
g
.,,;. y n.
,.....m
}
0FC :WMLU kj
- WMLU F' ' ~ F ~
- J3tarmer L,
NAME :JShaffner t.
DATE :85/ /
- 35/ /
,s. 4. cn:.:..." 4 ' '.Q *~-
.t n
- ..=1;,t,t;.
%g* -l '
n-
- y_
.UNTE3 STATES '
-v y
- ,, $ 1 J 1. Y-910 CLEAR REIULATORY COMMISSION#yg;; 3,a%'K*.( " f E
~
[5
. e ? *Ea ps:.W@'&' 2:dt,vj*.+.yx ?6.*
' s,.
. WA3Heef0 TON, D.C.3EBES a
..t r
g y
. ?
t.
y y.
, k,,,,
j '. >..;kgi.:3/,:.<..'-}:::-[.y.$.T..6-}[-'MI,f.f j ".' ;[ '#:"%[@2.'..
I.
+
e
..c.,.s.
.s
...s. n.:.
. w.
.. ll.: :
':S.:
'. /* ^
- P.4%.f ' ?. :.. ~...,, ;,
..e s c a.
.a EDO PRINCIPAL 1 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL '.,N..., ' ' '.
y..
i*** y!
- T.
~
. em
.a-me q q: W..n:. ;
s..:. %:::.;.b W '..it i.cz
.~
t.,.-
s,
-l -i.o.?~ d * * ;,"-i EDO CON 002216
.' SUE:
FROM:
- s..
-DOC
.10/02/86
-OOVERNOR JAMES R. THOMPSON W'
. ^ ' ~.. ( 'r.,,,.%:
r.
~ -
T-' FINAL R.
Ys
/
s,;.j..f..g;;;,..;';;.,.....';.
CTATE OF ILLINOIS,
,., z ;,.
4 TO:
~
.l CHAIRMAN TECH
.c FOR SIONATURE OF
- 'OREEN **
SECY NO: 96-1056 ROUTING:
DESC:
j, REQ UNDER SECTION 274B OF AEA AN AGREEMEAT BETWEEN t.TR ONLY NRC & STATE OF ILLINOIS UNDER WHICH NRC WILL STELLO DISCONTINUE & STATE WILL ASSUME CERTAIN REGULATORY ROE AUTHORITY FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS REW SNIEZEK
) DATE: 10/15/86 DAVIS KEPPLER ASSIONED TO: SP CONTACT: KERR OCUNNINGHAM
,SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
R)
FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION Y
I y,
1,
,)
i l
y l
J,.<
w.
N.
o s
- y,... ; -
?.
1;l e.
5,..
., 1 s...
'N
- (
3 4
.s
.a j
's.;
~
[
t m
i CFFICE CF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET NAFER NUMBER:
CRC-86-1056 IDGGING DATE: Oct 7 86 ACTION OFFICE:
EDO AUTHOR:
J.R. Thompson AFFILIATION:
ZL, GOVERNOR LETTER DATE:
Oct 2 86 FII2 CODE: IDER-15
SUBJECT:
Agreement between the NRC and the State of Ill for discontinuance of certain Come authority and responsibility within the State ACTION:
Appropriate EISTRIBUTION:
Chm, Cars SPECIAL BANDLING: None NOTES:
DATE DUE:
SIGNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
AFFILIATION:
I Rec'd Off. EDO
/ 0-/ 6 E Date Ti:ne
/ #Mf S
e O
EDO 002216
_ ~. -
STATE Or ILLINOIS Orracz or Tars Govunwon SPRINGFIELD S27CS Jauts R. Tnoursose October 2,1986 a.
The Honorable Lando W. Zech, Jr.
Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nashington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Chairman:
_By this letter I request establishment of an Agreement between the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (15tC) and the State of Illinois, as authorized under Section 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, under which the NRC will discontinue and the State of Illinois will assume certain regulatory authority for radioactive materials now under Federal l
jurisdiction.
I an authorized by the Illinois Radiation protection Act (Ill.
l Rev. Stat.
1983, ch. 111 1/2, par. 216b) and the Illinois Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Act (1934 Supp. to Ill. Rev. Stat.1983, ch.111 1/2, par. 241-19) to enter into such an Agreement with NRC.
The specific regulatory authority requer,ted at this time is for:
a.
Byproduct material as defined in Section llell) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; b.
Source materials; c.
Special nuclear materials in quantities not sufficient to form a critical mass; and, d.
Land disposal of source, byproduct and special nuclear material received from other persons.
I certify that the State of Illinois has a program for the control of radiation hazards adequate to protect the public health and safety with respect to the materials within the State covered by the proposed agreement, and that the State desires to assume regulatory responsibility for such materials.
In support of this proposal, I am submitting detailed information' describing the State's radiation control program and regulatory capabilities ]e and a copy of the State's radiation control regulations.
, i,
~
' ( I' p. a.'
eih
m,
..t k
~
(AS Nd [ U[
3 + [,lr Gff.
,,..s^
Page Two p
Agreement State DCtober 2,1986 At this time, the State does not wish to assume authority over uranium milling activities.
The State, however, reserves the right to apply at a future date to R C for an amended Agreement to assume authority in this area.
, Since f/
s Thompson.
sonanon d
0 e
e e
4 e
I i
l l
i j
l
]
1 1
l l
m.
I AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY Com!$$IOR AND THE STATE,DF ILLINOIS FOR DISCONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN s
ComISSION REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THE STATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 0F THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954 AS fMENDED l
^
WHEREAS, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission (hereinafter referred to as the Comission) is authorized under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the Act), to enter-into agreements with the Governor of any State providing for discontinuance of the regulatory authority of the Commis ion within the State under Chapters 6, 7 and 8, and Section 161 of the Act with respect to byproduct materials as
}
definedinSections11e.(1)and(2)oftheAct,sourcematerialsandspecial nuclear materials in quantities not suffjcient to form a critical mass; and, WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of 1111nojs is autt orized under Illinois Revised Statutes,1985, ch.111 1/2, par. 216b and ch.111 1/2, per.
241-19 to enter into this Agreement with the Cotenission; and, I
WHERIAS, the Governor of the State of Illinois certif ted on that.the State of Illinois (, hereinafter referred to as the State) has a s
program for the control of +adiation hazards adequate to protect the public health and safety with respect to the materials within the State covered by r
this Agreement, and that the State desires to assume regulatory responsibility.
for such materials; and.
WHEREAS, the Connaission found on that the program of the State for the regulation of the materials covered by this Agreement is compatible with the Counission's program for the regulation of such materials and is adequate to protect the public health and safety; and.
'WHEREAS, the State and the Counission recognize the desirability and importance of cooperation between the Commission and the State in the formulation of standards for protection against hazards of radiation and.in assuring that State and Commission programs for protection against ha n rits of radiation will be coordinated and compatible; and, WHEREAS, the Commission and the State recognize the desirability of reciprocal recognition of licenses and exemptions from licensing of those materials subject to this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; WOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED between the Connission and the Governor of the State, acting in behalf of the State as follows:
Q s\\
t g l
0 ART).!LE I s
. i Subject to the exceptions provided in Articles !!, IV and V, the Commission shall discontinue, as cl/ the effective date of this Agreement, the regulatory authority of the Consission in the State under Chapters 6, 7 and 8 and
)
Section 161 of the Act with respect to the following:
A.
Byproduct material as definet in section 11e.(1) of the Act;
, 9. 1 Source materials;
, C.
Special nuclear' materials in quantities not sufficient to form a critical mass; and,.
'D.
Yhtiland disposal of source, byproduct and special nuclear material received from other persons.
ARTICLE II This Agreement does not provide for discontinuance of any authority and the Comission shall retain authority and responsibility with respect to regulation of:
A.
The construction and operation of any production or utilization facility; B.
The export from er import into the United States of byproduct, source oc special nuclear material, or of any production or utilization fa:ility; C.
The disposal into the ocean or sea of byproduct, source or special nuclear waste materials as defined in regulations or orders of the Comissien; D.
The disposal of such other byproduct, source, or special nuclear f
material as the Comission from time to time determines by regulation s
l 3'
s or order should, because of the hazards or potential hazards thereof, not be so disposed of without a license from the Comission; and.
I E.
The extraction or' concentration of source material from source material ore and the management and disposal of the resulting byproduct material.
ARTICLE III 1
This Agreement may be amended,'upon application by the State and approval by l
the Comission, to include the additional area specified in Article II, paragraph E, whereby the State can exert regulatory control over the materials t '
stated therein.
1 19 ARTICLE IV llotwithstanding this Agreement, the Comission may from time to time by rule, i
regulation or order, require that the manufacturer, processor, or producer of any equipment, device, comodity, or other product containing source, byproduct or special nuclear material shall not transfer possession or control of such product except pursuant to a license or an exemption from licensing issued by the Comission.
ARTICLE V This Agreement shall not affect the authority of the Comission under subsection 161 b. or 1. of the Act to issue rules, regulations or orders to protect the comen defense and security, to protect restricted data or to guard against the loss or diversion of special nuclear material.
ARTICLE VI i
The Commission will use its best efforts to cooperate with the State and other Agreement States in the formulation of standards and regulatory programs of the State and the Comission' for protection against hazards of radiation and to assure that State and Comission programs for protection against hazards of i
radiation will be coordinated and compatible. The State will use its best efforts to cooperate with the Commission and other Agreement States in the formulation of standards and regulatory programs of the State and the Comission for protection against hazards of radiation and to assure that the State's program will continue to be compatible with the program of the Cossiission for the regulation of like materials. The State and the Comission will use their best efforts to keep each other informed of proposed changes in their respective rules and regulations and licensing, inspection and i
enforcement policies end criteria and to obtain the cosaments and assistance of the other party thereon, I
ARTICLE VII The Consiission and the State agree that it is desirable to provide reciprocal recognitio of licenses for the materials listed in Article I licensed by the other party or by any Agreement State. Accordingly, the Couniission and the State agree to use their best efforts to develop appropriate rules, regulatlons and procedures by which such reciprocity will be accorded.
l l
ARTICLE VIII The Comission, upon its own initiative after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing to the State, or upon request of the Governor of the j
State, may terminate or suspend all or part of this Agreement and reassert the I
l licensing and regulatory authority vested in it under the Act if the 1
I Commission finds that (1) such termination or suspension is required to protect the public health and safety, or (2) the State has not complied with one or more of the requirements of Section 274 of the Act. The Commission may also, pursuant to Section 274j of the Act, temporarily suspend all or part of this Agreement if, in the judgment of the Commission, an emergency situation exists requiring immediate action to protect public health and safety and the State has failed to take necessary steps. The Commission shall periodically review this Agreement and actions taken by the State under this Agreement to ensure compliance with Section 274 of the Act.
ARTICLE IX This Agreement shall become effective on and shall remain in effect unless and until suc.h time as it is terminated pursuant to Article VIII.
Done at in triplicate, this
' day of i
For the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman For the State of Illinois l
Governor l
l l
[
l r.r r
---e w
-w-,-is- -,
w w
w w
---e-
-w.-
---w-g.
.-w.---
l1 74 MDAORANDUM
'4.
OF CALL
/O Pvwious editions vesth Q.08L.
YOU WERE CALLEO Bv-O v0u wEae viSireO sv-M I
or (orpenuation) h PLEASE PHONE >
FTS AUTOVON
. WILL CALL AGAIN
- IS WAITING iO SEE v0U O aETuaNEO v0ua c4tL DWiSaEs#~ AerOiNTuE~T
]$fdfh
~'~
414 w -
6, t
ll J s G ddi to &a) n RECEIVEO SV OATE TI I
c.
63 110 NSN 7540404,4-4018. T RDFO M 43 (Rev. 841) 3 m eat h p11.4.
e u.s. G.P.O. sees.42i.sn/mi t
l 4 /7