ML20212J957

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to to J Phillips Re State of Il Dept of Nuclear Safety Proposed Rules for Radiation Protection,In Particular,Section 340.2010(b) of Stds for Protection Against Radiation.Related Info Encl
ML20212J957
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/28/1986
From: Nussbaumer D
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Lechowicz T, Olson M
ILLINOIS, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML20210H056 List:
References
FOIA-87-47 NUDOCS 8703090183
Download: ML20212J957 (15)


Text

-

l y

i.

C:' 2 E 193b The Honorable Ted Lechowicz, Co-Chaiman The Honorable Myron Olson, Co-Chaiman Joint Comittee on Administrative Rules Illinois General Assembly 509 S. Sixth Street. Room 500 Springfield, Illinois 62701 Gentlenen:

Thank you for your letter of Octcher 9,1986 to Mr. John Phillips concerning the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety's (IDf!S) procesed rules for radiation protection, in particular, Section 340.2010(h) no the Standards for Protection Against Radiation. NRC Office of Stcte Prograns (OSP) and IDt:5 staffs have been negotiatina e Sectior 2746 agreenent and I have been asked tn respond to your letter.

By way of background, Section 274d of the Atomic Energy Act, as emandM',

states that the Comission shall enter into an agreemnt with a Statt if, among other things, it finds that the State program is cons tih19 with the Comission's progran for regulating radioactive mtarials covered by the Agreement. Compatibility of State regulatinns is an essential part of a finding of compatibility for the overell State MRC staff routinely reviews draft Stato regulations and progran.

requests revisions when needed to assure compatibility with PTC reguistions. Section 20.201 of 10 CFR Part 20, " Standards for Protection Against Radiation" is an iten of compatibility.

[

The background and purpose of Section P0.201(b) [which includet the language contained in Section 340.2010(b)] is explained in the attached Statement of Consideration (46 FR 53647, October 20, 1981, enclosure 1).

It may be helpful to recognize that with respect to standards for wher radiation surveys "are reasonable," there are references readily available to regulatory staffs and to licensees and registrants that provide guidance. These include NRC Regulatory Guides as well as i

national and international reports and recomendations, such as those published by National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, The International Comission on Radiological Protection and the Arrricer National Standards Institute (see enclosure 2 for examples). Thesc i

documents are widely accepted by the health physics connunity as sourcas l

of infomation on standards for acceptable practice for radiation protection prograns. As is evident from a reading of enclosure 2, wny 8703090183 870226

. me >

PDR FOIA

~~.....

RADERB7-47 PDR sw==e >

n.........

l are reau m no soi n=eu eno OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

The lionoreble Lechnwicz and Olson..

are narrew in senp1 rnd spec Hic to certt n cr.tecories o' ustrs or tvpas i

of radiation hazards. Thus, it would be neithar dasirable ner practicable in our view to incorporate then into e gecrr11.' conlicabin radiation pentection reaulation.

Individual licansees nay cemit to following a spacific reguintory guide or other standard in the license application.

If I ccn be cf other assistanco, please let nn know.

Sincerely, Donald A. Nussbruner Assistent Directne 4r Stata Acreanerts Prnoem Office of'Stetc Proactir.

Enclosure--

As strted cc: w/cr.cl.

C. Salus, IP"5 P. East"c'd, IMS Distribution:

SA R/F Dir R/F

~

J0LUbenau 1111noisfile(fc)w/incomingandw/ enc 1./

RLickus, w/ enc 1 and w/ incoming JPhi111ps, RPB, w/ encl. and w/ incoming Juapes, OGC

/

1 cence pt 3A

(

OGC M..

n" /biJ b"..s'sb'a'u"e'r' " ' a'p' 's" " "

.u o, S Q2/,8,6,,,,,,,1,0/[......4.Ne..g.

g un.

.l0b.

/,8,6,,,

, r,1,0//$ /,8,s,,

,,,,,,,,,,...l, Mac '2M338 i?o 'o' N acMono OFFICI AL R ECOR D COPY

PART 20 e STATEMENTS OF CONSIDERATION 1.One esmment seeted thet the 1s0 and sesociated l6 cense esaditises- ' supenasertasy essemession Ch M ndments were unnecessary because This le consistent with 40 CFR 19D.11.

3,3mes Numiser Segeistory are already required to comply which mquires that 4 meulstory C nin,lulon(NRC) pubtlehed le the y,de,eq goggeter ges yR amene anne) wt CFR Port too. The purpose of the yenting a ver6enes abound make -

nie le to incorporate the the schedule for achievieg -

proposed miseelleneous eierifyles CFR Part les requirements with 40 GR Part 18e.

amendmente to ll 38101.Eles, a).(b}, mies med sagt@) ofits late tiene to make it more

5. One comment stated that a

tiene

ste ede ser Protection Agelset sleetthat lanes with to CFR Part should have 80 days to report 18 ele of to CFR Part les to NRC,re them Radieuse" le 10 CFR Part se. laterested

2. One stated that the the 30 days spedRed in the poroses were levlted to euhait writtee

-amaa and sugentless se the mto 40 CFR Port 100 and to rule.Se reasse gives wee proposed -ad===*= dueleg the almty-hcensees need more time ^M ieg day comment perled whis empired

- _ h Port 30 ndia I should be CF calculeisses eseecisted wp esesos Sepueber3 temPlwlouereof esmbined.bece both regulatione selete to r * - - rol sempliance.The NRC seen has asuroestwere seestved.WhGe e5 es nuclear power roebro.eeses from This le not concheded that the so. day seguimaset le ensemestem addmond the propeeed practical because 40fFR Part 1s0 also reasonable. Specific hposes eseadoes abnegos to ll E101.R18B.R10e(s).

applies to fuel cycle resihties other than which implement thielrequirement ler

@) and R105, eeW ene nameser power reactors and bolseuse the two indiv6 dual facilities erGI ellow 8I*'l I*

SI' pe[orm dose ce se i

.the e aff to avoiding unnecenery dupt tive appropriate. /

the C t

would be requiremente for reactore by ombining Pursuant le he AlamincEmergy Act of best h tensider the proposed elettfyles solesse limite end reportmg i 1964, se amended.ee Emergy s h hh$$Elet.E100, seguiremente for 40 CFR Part 100 with Reorganisation Act of 1974. as amended

  • R104(a).@) and *0.108 la acessedes esisting Appendia Irequirementein and section SE3 of title 8 of the Unhed wls the overeu review and sevision of individuallicensees* technical

\\.

Statee Code. the following amendmeste 10 CFR Part se surrently la les 3.Dne comment empreteed conce\\

ero publphed as e document subject to yR tents.hderd E 18AB.See for specificettone.

Prewcese Agaleet Resados: Advance that 40 CFR Part too applied to y,gge, og pyeposed 3

).These miseeneneen eierifying to esmbined todietion doses from all fuel de P sseet wiu accerengly be eseeldered la that cycle facilities making it difficult to to/so/st

  • - and seeelved la e meneer determine compliance. EPA eddrened g

,,w tt/30/st appropriate to and senstatest with he thle leeue when 40 CFR Port iso wee proposed overeB revielen of Part a For published. IPA stated:"' ' ' le the gg gpft Part3D this mesee, the NRC le set sosponeng vest majority of situations the sum of all reasonably postulable contributione nedeGeo Protesten Seresy to se public coeuseets en il 30.101 from sources other than the immediate Requirement,WeseGenseus Clergphg E108.El e).@) and M100 et he site will be emell compared to these Ameendmasse present time.

the NRC wlR address these esausset is senmec6os standarde end should be ignored is asenNulmsReguleent with the mejor rewtelen of part R essessing compliance"(42 FR asE Ceaseission Since he esedIer a tiertfyleg j nuary 13.1977).

mense Pinelside.

amendment t to surwy mietmeende

4. One comment P nted out that 40 G soJet(b) remaine preselse med elsee i

ummany M

Wely wbb tem to t:iR Part too allows for licensees'to sm.'1b finlow Reguleeny e

M hee avhed he ok sh amendmet eenkhod tbtain vertences to exceed 40 0FR Part emia d propued I

190 limite under temporary and unvouel sesidetens b esake slo w e d, h h &Q'y-- the NRC has decided. in the conditions and requested NRC to esendense wit to artgeel esguealey specify procedures for obtaining sud latest.pareses may be died ter hused of to pebbe heeldi j

verienew. Because variances will be eteletesof theISCrenoese and safety,to to e considered only in unusudl cases, it la greassess earvey seguirenses h amendment k

$)et tio preferable le treet each se en se

& Bal4) feeIndure to parlerm og Tk sely esament seestved on individual beeie.This consistent with when teensted se ser peeleredag te eiereytag -- d===*

to 10 nieting NRC regulet

e. which do not hadeguate seveyt Foresse est be CFR East @)goosessed whether the specify procedern obioinine emed est uly when en satse h sees, proposedleagunge Ameested the goal netenen h newd reguleinyTimite.

er mepesu metenafen hadegnese af evenspeemes.The Rether.10 CrA lje sei mewe -11.

survey assens m e itsienne afemee n papened wee em setended w l

Commlee6en may.upon application by IRCredesse possemensatendard but eliminate paventive actless beesase else le Gees aircumstessesla utish the objective and prieelpel fussese of eny 16censee et/upon its own initiative, grant such en ptione from the etelense af as 3GCseteten to survey seguirement is preveneve. By requirement of the regulehone in thle standed seald have acessed provleep leformenos seesmeing the part se it d ermines are authorised by of esleek af as adegente esever esse entent er seestles and reeessen lew and will not enuit in undue heaerd toegh as seek adesionalstelseen materialheaerde tiet be pneest.

j n teella estually ed esser.

he survey serves se ef

-(

One inor cleri ng change related to ePFe0TVue eaTet November a m Qeues g to life erAroperty.=

gg g.

varie es =as me e o the proposed pen puurnes eepenaeanese seistasti hWWMme h whid tule ' hen a heensee submits to NRC e Alan K.Renkble.Oneuponesel violatione of to GR Part as seuld occur.

re rt of encessive radioactive rolesen.

Redetes Proteetlee Breneh.(Mise af Argumenteb meebeeneenSetthe h

t description of eorrective steps taken Noche Regeldery Reseerd13pec, hddiRN bade W 6e planned shallinclude the schedule for Weehtegtse. EC. mess,Telepheme Web) eww eg g East @)W ble sely chievtng conformance with to CPR Part ees.eyrg,

/

20 SC.24 September 1,1932 i

+~

-we,.

w--.

PART 20 e STATEMENTS OF CONSIDERATION I

when noncompliance with the survey the commenter, the enleting text of the relocation of Region V in Appen f

requirement results in violation of 4 20 20t(b)has been retained with an A to Port ys le made lo a document another Part 30 requirement provided adelition to make clear that surveye must opgrading notification precedures f the impetse for the proposed change. For be reasonably intended to prevent repwtina cents that significantly ffect example, one boonsee argued that violatione.no clarifying phrees physicaTeecurity effectiveneas.

$ 30.301 wee not violated where a provides that when a vlotation of other

$ lace these amendmente are person entered a radiation field of 300 part 30 requiremente hee not occurred, administrative and relate solel to a rem /hr after periorslag an inaccurate the Commluion will considerin m6nor procedural matter. not' of andlacomplete survey indicatiaq e determining whether 9 30.3D1 survey proposed rulemaking and radiation Beld of 70 rees/hr and aid not requirement has ont the rg.sonablenese procedure thereon are 1---

nry, and receive an exposure la emesse of Part 30 of the actions taken in the u ht gf all the good eeuse enlete to mah the s

limite.However, the sole commenter circumetences to evaluate the extent of amendmente egective eher as, suggested that a ofI3D. apt (b) rediation hasarde.

gest.

wee not eensatial to te Pursuant to the Atemde Beassy Act of pwomaat to the At ic Energy Act of leadequate that might cause gg64, as amended, the Energy 1964, as amended, thp Energy but did not y resultin additional Reormanlaation Act of1g74. as amended.

Reorganisation Act4f1974.as amended.

violatione incesse the present language and Sections 552 and 563 of Title 5 et the and sections 562 asid 843 of Title 5 of the in I as. apt (b) oomid he read to cover United States Code. the following United States Code.the following such circumstances.%e Commiselos clarifytng amendment to 10 CFR Part 20 amendawnte toTitle M Chapter L Code eaetlaues to believe that I ao.ap1(b) le publiebed as a document subject to of Federal Reguistions are published as abould be clarined to seeke clear to all codification a document e biect to codification.

eencerned that is order to provide adequate protection of worker health

/

and safety, each licensee has as asPRessei independent and enforceable obliga6tg PuhNehad A2/t2t to sacertain the extent of radiation awese e12/141 hasards t by conducting adequate

/

s surveys.

amendment pute Beensees 44 FR 57045 Lkendng Aseutrements for she on notice that nce with the Pinas.n.d11125/s1 Storereef3pearfueHa'"

Coeuniulon's re calrequiremenks s,ep,ndent Spent fuel 3torcee

,,,,,,,,,,f,,f,,

b Part M enouId be de0Ign and not testelletion; Minor Ciertfring end Certuitoes Conforming Amendments While there le a alpineaat releuemehty between the survey le CFR Ports 1 and 30

/ see Pws 72 swea no of ceaedente requirement and other Port 30 requiremente.in that leformentios lChange of Address for NRC Reglen V,f obtelmed peepenelble l0mee compliance wt I sikast(b) may well

seesesv
Nuclear Regulatory 47 FR 14182 prove seesetlal la determining whether

,Commiselon.

i pw.n.s 4/is/s2 i

a heemsee has er has not entieSed other

-actiom$inalmie: change d oddmu' g,,estive 4/ts/s2 Part as requiremente.thle le not the coevesten 47 rn ses1

"% d the tevesesaav:ne Nuclear Regulatery utmous. De it CPR M 30

- le e

!Commiselon le amending its aghlettene

{y

,",8',,

g",,,

.Sta.nd.ards for Protectlen A, gainst

,,e te'marvey em g

fo,.e h.ai. e.d meaeweMe ker and the pubuc e e R.,tecere-.,,. vie

,* " N

,,dm,

  • safety of the wor hr te dthe et Regutetery Guide 8.15 MN.b""*g"**

tnew eddrwe for NRC Region V.

asemev: Nuclear Reguletory adequate protective eeuwes.no iertscTwo sava:Novemberas test.

yemaleelee, essfulases of this "early warning teon Puernea moonesation sentaev:

aavisse Flaal rule.

l erstem"may be earleuely reduced if y M Felten. Director / Division of Rulee basesses are not held reopenali,le for len d itecords. Ofnovof Adminletretten.

sussataav:ne Nuclear Regulatory Inuure to esadest any servey er for U.S. Nuclear tory Commission.

Commission le namnding its mguletions.

Gathee to esaduct as adeemste survey Washington.D. seteo. Telephone (801) forProtection Against whos violamens of ethw part so ess-fat 1.

Radia 0 CFR Part 30, to place requirossets have not escurred.

euppttesserfagly espeessaTiest The mqu fu en accepteW Therefore, to make enforeement el the Nuclear R tory Commleelen hee moptretory p#etection progrom.

survey 4---- _ rt. I 3DJet(b) relocated i Region V offlee in Weimut surrently rated by reference in essengest upon whether other Crwk.

la.no new address for 1 30.108, to 130.103.nle la e violettees et Part 3 have in fact the Regl V ofRee le 1400 Marie lane, minor mee ndsnenHo me seeweed, may adverselyimpact the Suite Wolmst Creek.Californie Nguletion roe to dental by the sur,ey pu, yen of pe,ves tal Othee of the F 1 Aggleter of

,,g g harm to the worker er the c.

n aseendmente am made le i talb) eenunwd appmvelof that i

es pwpo$ there has been as change is Althou and dis D to Peri 30. De lacorporetion.by refore provtsion.

se of the eiertfyin8 e

nt to Appendt D to Port so is erreetwa satt: April 15.I amendment, the test of revtsed se,,:omplete reviolon of the con rusmosa espoossariose acT:

8 30.30t(b) differs from the tent set out endan in order to simplify its format.

Me. Lynnette Hendricks. Office'ef in the proposed rule. As suggested by ne amendroent neceeeary to reflect Nuclear Regulatory Research. UA Nuclear Regulatory Commleolon N l

j Weehington. D C. 30654 (301) 441-59 0 1

I 20 SC 25 September 1,19g2 i

i

_. _. - _., _ ~,,. - _ _. -

A

~

e 5 = '.

., c.,..i.. y...,

'. < r i%.'4. *

~.

sw Parcatmomaar Ptocamunes fg le 0

4 u.

su rveye.

ta) As used in the regulations in this F

part. " survey *' means an evaluation of the radiation har.ards incident to the psoduction, use, release, disposal, or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a spe.

cific set of conditions. When appropri.

ate, such evaluation includes a physt.

e41 s n ny of the location ut materials ha.d wuu,nas t. and measurements of le t ti. vi ratsastion or concentrations of a ntitoartive material present.

as Lun In:ensee shall make or cause to te made such surveys as (1) I may be riecessary for the licensee to comply w?'h the regulations in this p.a t, anc 42) nre reasonable tander the circumstatuu to evatunte the extent tJ r.

. nin 1

7. nf t that may be g present.

f (fl PR IMle. Nov.17 lHO, as amended at n i 44 8344B, Oct. 30. IN11

..,... g

=....

e sm.

t

?e,

  • g 9 e p\\.., fe

~

e

REGULATORY GUIDES DIVISION 4 REGULATORY GUIDES ENVIRONMENTAL AND SITING GUIDES Number Title Date Revision 4.1 Programs for Monitoring Radioectivity in the Environs of 4/75 I

Nuclear Power Plants 4.2 Properstice of Envirosunental Reports for Nuclear Power ind 2

Stations t 4.3 Measurements of Radionuclides in the Environment-(withdrawn 12/9/76)

Analysis of I 131 in Milk 4.4 Reporting Procedures for Mathematica! Models Selected 594 to Predict Heated Effluent Diepersion in Natural Water Bodies 4.5 Measurements of Radionuclides in the Environownt-SO4 Sampling and Analysis of Plutonium in Soil 4.6 Measumments of Radionuclides in the Environment-504 Strontium-89 and Strontium 90 Aantrees 4.7 General Site Suitability Criteria for Nuclear Power i105 1

Stations 4.8 Environmental Technical Specincations for Nuclear Power 12/75 Plants 4.9 Preparation of Environmental Reports for Commercial 10/75 1

Uranium Enrichment Facilities 4.10 Irreversible and Irntrievable Commitments of Material (withdrawn 11/1797)

Re.ou,ces 4.11 Terrestrial Environmental Studies for Nuclear Power sp?

1 Stations 4.12

[Not yet published]

4.13 Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for 107 1

Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications 4.14 Radiological Efouent and Environmental Monitorin$

,4/so I

at Uranium Mills 4.15 Quality Asmarance for RadiologicalMonitoring Program 2/79 3

(Normal Operations)-Effluent Streams and the Environment

7. st.16 Monitoring and Repor Radleesthity la Releases of Radio-12I85 I

settve Meterials in und and Oessous Effhseats from Nuclear Fuel Procesens and Fabrication Plants and Uranism Heasfluoride Productice Plants I/82 4.g7

!Eenederd Format and Content of Site Characterination Reports for High LevelWaste Geologic Repodtories 4.11 Standate Format and Content of I wronmental Reports for 4/B3 Near.Surfsee Disposal of Padioactive Waste December 31,1906 RG-14 t

Ch?*

w

REGULATORY GUIDES DIVISION 8 REGULATORY GUIDES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Number Title Date Revision 8.1 Radiation Symbol 2/73 8.2 Administrative Practices in Radiation Monitoring 2/73 8.3 Film Badge Performance Criteria 2/73 8.4 Direct Reading and Indirect Reading Pocket Dosimeters 2/73 8.5 Criticality and Other Interior Erscuation Signals 3/s1 I

8.6 Standard Test Procedures for Geiger-Muller Counters 5/73 8.7 Occupational Radiation Exposure Records Systems 5/73 8.8 Information Relevant to Ensuring that Occupational 6/78 3

Radiation Exposures at Nuclear Power Stations Will Be as Low as is Reasonably Achievable 8.9 Acceptable Concepts, Models, Equations, and As-9/73 sumptions for a Bioassay Program 8.10 Operating Philosophy for Maintaining Occupational 5/77 1R Radiation Exposures as Low as is Reasonably Achievable (Nuclear Power Reactors) 8.11 Applications of Bioassay for Uranium 6/74 8.12 Criticality Accident Alarm Systems 1/as 8.13 Instruction Concerning Prenatal Radiation Esposure I1/75 1

8.14 Personnel Neutron Dosimeters 8/77 1

8.15 Acceptable Programs for Respiratory Protection 10/76 8.16 (Not yet pubbshed]

8.17 (Not yet published]

l l

l 8.18 Information Relevant to Ensuring That Occupational to/s2 i

Radiation Exposures at Medicallnatitutions Will Be as Low as Reasonably Achievable 8.19 Occupational Radiation Dose Auessment in Light Water 7/79 Reactor Power Plants-Design Stage Man-Rem Estimates 8.20 Appbcations of Bioassay for 1125 and I.131 9/79 8.21 llealth Physics Surveys for Byproduct Material at NRC.

so/n I

Licensed Proceuing and Manufacturing Plants 8.22 Bioassay at Uratuum Mills 7/78 RG-21 Novemtwr 30,1962

m

.~-

REGULATORY GUIDFS Number Title Date Revision 8.23 Radiatien Safety Surveyest MedicalInsdtutions

is 3

8.24 Heahh Phyalcs Surveys Deshes Enriched Uramiem-235 Proceenns and to/79 1

Fuel Fabricadon (Comments requested by J/25/79) 8.25 Calibradon and Error Limits of Air Sampling Instruments for 8/80 Total Volume of Air Sampled 8.26 Appheations of Bioassay for Findon and Activetion Products 9fso s.27 Radiation Protection Training for Personnel et 4/sl Lishi Water <ooled Nuc} ear Power Plants 8.28 Audible Alarm Dosimeter 9/81 8.29 Instruction Concerning Risks from Occupational 7/81 Radiation Exposure p 8.30 Health Physics Surveys in Uranium Mdis 6/83 8.31 information Relevant to Ensuring that Occupational Radiation 5/83 Exposures at Uranium MDis WCl Be As Low Asis Reasonably Achievable e

June M,1983 RG 22 I

..... _. _.~.

. :..... g g ' Q%

'l

~t

~:

1

~

.....7 4

T *, - s' s

.4**,

RADIATION PROTECTION

..~.-

I ICRP PUBLICATION 12 i

. f,-

..,;-u

. s General Principles of Monitoring

", *.'?

for Radiation Protection of Workers

.p A Report by Committee 4 of the International Commission on-7 Radiological Protection

.b

  • - - [-

Adopted by the Comminion on May 24,1968

..nv s; w 3

h~ '

l'.H[..

j 1

t I.

6

..t l

l ** i

[-~

PUBLISHED FOR

'Jl[-

'Ibe International Femmi++ ion on Radiological Protection BY 5

PERGAMON PRESS I

OXFORD

  • LONDON EDINBURGH NEW YORK TORONTOa SYDNEY PARIS BRAUNSCKWEIG y

.(

4

. Jamar =mst

~.. - -. _

e

./

4'u=.....

~~

g s.

f

%0v a

9 _. -

i 1

3 0

4 XCRP Publications 1

The S(

'U" NCRP publications are distributed by the NCRP Publications' 2

Myb ofiice. Information on prices and how to order may be obtained by i

directing an inquiry to:

3 R iat.

~

NCRP Publications L Fi i

7910 Woodmont Ave., Suite 1016 see a Bethesda, MD 20814 4

From

  • The currently available publications are listed below.

1 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting in St 1

5 How H No.

Title F. C h

1 Perceptions of Risk, Proceedinp of the Fifteenth Annual Setti Meeting, Held on March 14-15,1979 (Including Taylor 6

Ethics, Lecture No. 3) (1980)

Saen 2

Quantitatwe Risk in Standards Setting, Proceedinp of the andi Sixteenth Annual Meeting Held on April 2-3, 1980 7

The H, (Including Taylor Lecture No. 4) (1981)

Merr l

3 CriticalIssues in Setting Radiation Dose Limits, Proceed-tal R' inn of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting, Held on April 8

La.marat 8-9,1981 (Including Teylor Lecture No. 5) (1982)

Hara 1

4 Radiation Protection arvi New Medical Diagnostic Proce.

Impo I

dures, Proceedmp of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting, omm Held on April 6-7,1982 (Includmg Taylor Lecture No.

9 Truth (,

6) (1983)

Harh 5

Environmental Radioactivity, Proceedmp of the Nine-

~3 teenth Annual Meeting, Held on April 6-7,1983 (In-cluding Taylor Lecture No. 7) (1984) s 6

Some Issues Important in Developing Basic R~dist;oa Pro-3 tection Recommendations, PrMa= of the Twentieth No.

E -2 Annual Meeting, Held on April 4-5,1984 (Including j

Taylor Lecture No. 8) (1985) 8 Control

~

orato

?

Symposium Proceedings 9

Recomr and1 The Control of Exposure of the PuNac to Ioniring Radiation in the 12 Recome Event of Accident or Attack, Proceedmp of a Symposium held Aprij 27-29, 1981 (1982)

(195e 2

as2 2

Al I

L

s NCRP PUB 1JCATIONS

/

363 Lauriston 8. Taylor Lectures No.

Title and Author 1

The Squares of the NaturalNumbers in Radation Protec-NCRP Publications, tion by Herbert M. Parker (1977) 2 Why be Quantstatwe About Radiation Risk Estunates7 by

" Y 9,yg,9,g y,

Sir Edward Pochin (1978) 3 Radiation Protection-Concepts and Trade Offs by Hymer L. Friedell (1979) [Available also in Perceptions of Risk, a1016 see above]

4 From " Quantity of Radiation" and "Done" to " Exposure" and " Absorbed Dose"-An Historical Review by Harold O. Wyckoff (1980) [Available also in Quantitative Risks sting in Standards Setting, see above) 5 How Well Can We Assess Genetic RiskiNot Very by James F. Crow (1981) [Available also in Critical Issues in he Fifteenth Annual Setting Radiation Dose Limits, see above]

'79 (Including Tr.ylor 6

Ethics, Trade-offs and Medical Radiation by Eugene L.

Saenger (1982) [Available also in Radiation Protection g, Proceedmga of the and New Medical Diagnostic Approaches, see above}

on April 2-3, 1980 7

The Human Environment-Past, Present and Future by 1981)

Merril Eisenbud (1983) [Available dso in Environmen-1 & Limits, Proceed.

tal Radioactivity, see above}

i eeting, Held on April 8

Limitation and Assessment in Radiation Protection by e No. 5) (1982)

Harald H. Rossi (1984) [Available also in Some Issues

.a! Diagnostic Proce.

Important in Developing Basic Radiation Protection Rec-sth Annual Meeting, ommendations, see above}

,,j t Taylor Lecture No.

9 Truth (and Beauty) in Radiation Measurement by John H.

Harley (1985)

.7 edings of the Nine-MMWE l April 6-7,1983 (In-NCRP Reports

$kh}.I n4) meds Basic Radiation Pro-fV i

&j l s.g of the Tweatleth No.

Title

.'. b; k.f 6-5,1984 (Ind.xling A

8 Control and Removal of Radioactive Contamsnation in Lab-

'MV oratories (1951)

MY 9

Recommendations for Waste Disposal of Phosphorus-32

^

g 4 ggg,ggo, g,, g,y and Iodine-131 for Medical Users (1951)

~

yp,,;,, ygg gp,51 12 Recommendations for the Disposal of Carbon-14 Wastes (1953)

I e

l s

364

/

NCRP PUBLICATIONS 16 Radioactive Waste Disposalin the Ocean (1954) 53 Revie Fe 22 Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Per-raissible Concentrations of Radionuclides in Air and in 54 Med Pr Water for Occupatwnal Emosure (1959) \\lacludes Ad-n 55 Prot.

dendum I issued in August 1963]

Measurement of Neutron Flux and Spectra for Physical Re 23 56 Radi and Biologscal Appiscatwns (1960) lar 25 Measurement of Absorbed Dose of Neutrons and Mixtures 57 Insti of Neutrons and Gamma Rays (1961)

Pr 27 Stopping Powers for Use with Cavity Chambers (1961) 58 AH 30 Safe Handkng of R&"e Materials (1964) 2r 32 Pndmunn Protection in E+~h~salInstautwns (1966) 33 Medscal X-Ray and Gamma Ray Protectwn for Energies 59 Oper 60 Ph>

Up to 10 MeV-Equspment Design and Use (1968) iu 35 DentalX Ray Protectson(1970) 36 Padmnnn Protectwn in Veterimry Medscine (1970) 61 Rad 37 Premishnns in the Managerr.ent of Patients Who Have rc Recewed Therapeutic Amounts of Radwnuctsdes (1970) 62 Trit 63 Trit 38 Protection against Neutron Radiation (1971) j 39 Basic Radiation Protection Criteria (1971) p, 40 Protectwn Agamst Bndmhnn from Brachytherapy Sources 64 Infl R

(1972) 65 Ma >

Specification of Gamma-Ray Brachytherapy Sources (1974) 41 R

42 Radiological Factors Affecting Decision Makmg in a Nu-66 Ma clear Attack (1974) i 43 Review of the Current State of Radiation Protection Phi.

67 Rac ti losophy (1975) f[

Krypton-85 in the Atmosphere-Accumulation, Biological rr 44 68 Rac Significance, and Control Technology (1975) 45 Natural Background Radiation in the United States (1975) 69 Dos 7

~)

46 Alpha-Emitting Particles in Lungs (1975) 70 Nu j

47 Tntsum Measurement Techniques (1976) i.

48 Radiation Protection for Medscal and Allied Health Person-o 71 op, nel(1976) 49 Structural Shielding Design and Evaluation for Medical 72 gas t

b Use of X Rays and Gamma Rays of Energies Up to 10 73 Pn 9

MeV(1976)

)

~l 50 Erwironmental Radiation Measurements (1976)

Radiation Protection Design Guidelines for 0.1-100 MeV 74 Bic 51

)

k Particle Accelerator Facilities (1977)

{

52 Cesium-137 From the Erwironment ta Maru Metabolism 75 toc t

and Dose (1977) i

'l

NCRP PUBLICATIONS

/

365 in the 0cean (1954) 53 Review of NCRP Radiation Done Limit for Embryo and Burdens and Massmum Per-Fetus in Occuptionally Esposed Women (1977)

' Radionuclides in Air and in 54 Medical Radiation Esposure of Pregnant and Potentially sposure (1959) [ Includes Ad-Pregnant Women (1977) t 1963) 55 Protection of the Thyroid Gland in the Event of Releases of luz end Spectra for Physi al Radiciodine (1977) s(1960) 56 Radiation Esposure From Consumer Products and Miscel-ne of Neutrons and Mixtures laneous Sources (1977)

'ays (1961) 57 Instrumentataan and M<misorirag Methods for Rodsation

's Cavity Chambers (1961)

,Proesetaan(1978)

Materials (1964) 58 A Handbook of Radsoactivity Measurements Procedures, crionalInstitutions (1966) 2nd ed. (1985)

Ray Protection for Energies 59 OperationalP=Wrkn Safety Program (1978) t Design and Use (1968) 60 Physical, Chemical, and Biologscal Properties of Radiocer-10) ium Relevant to Radiation Protection Guidelines (1978) inary Medicine (1970) 61 Radiation Safety Trauung Criteria for Industrial Radiog-nent of Patients Who Have raphy (1978) ants of Radionuclides (1970) 62 Tritium in the Environment (1979) adiation (1971) 63

' Tritium and Other Radionuclide Labeled Organic Com-iteria (1971) pounds Incorporated in Genetic Material (1979) from BrachytherapySources 64 Influence of Dose and Its Distribution in 7Tme on Done-Response Relationships for Low-LET Radiations (1980) trachytherapySources(1974) 65 Management of Persons Accidentally Contaminated with

' Decision-Making in a Nu-Radionuclides (1980) 66 Mammography (1980)

>f Radation Protection Phi-67 Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields-Properties, Quan-tities and Units, BiophysicalInteraction, and Measure-e-Accumulation, Biological ments (1981) echnologor (1975) 68 Radsataan Protection in Pedsatnc Radsology (1981) n in the UnitedStates (1975) 69 Dosimetry of X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Beams for Radiation

' mas (1975)

Therapy in the Energy Range 10 kev to 50 MeV (1981) ques (1976) 70 Nuclear Medicine Factors influencing the Choice and Use atandAlliedHealth Person-of Radionuclides in Diagnosis and Therapy (1982) 71-Operational Radiation Safety-Trainmg (1983) snd Evaluation for Medical 72 Radiatnon Protectaon and Measurement for Law Voltare Rays of Energies Up to 10

,, Neutron Generators (1983) 73 Protection in Nuclear Medecane and Ultranound Deetnoetic surements (1976)

Pranduraein CAnidies(1983) luidelines for 0.1-100 MeV 74 Biologscal Effects of Ultrasound: Mechanisms and Clirucal s(1977)

Implications (1983) unent to Man: Metabolism 75 Iodine-129: Evaluation of Releases from Nuclear Power Generation (1983)

K W}{g' wor >A

n 1

366

/

NCRP PUBUCATIONS

~

76 Radiological Assessment Predicting the Transport, Bioac.

The following cumulation, and Uptake by Man of Radionuclides Re.

pnnt:

Leased to the Environment (1964) 77 Exposures from the Uramum Series with Emphasis on go'

?-

Radon and its Daughters (1964) 78 Evaluation of Occupatsonal and Environmental Emosures 3

to Radon and Radon Daughters in the United States y_g; l

a (1984) 2 Radi 79 Neutron Contammation from Medical Electron Accelera-tors (1984) 3 X-R<

80 Induction of Thyroid Cancer by lonizing Radiation (1985)

N' 81 Carbon 14 in the Environment (1985) 4 Rads

?

82 SI Units in Radiation Protection and Measurements (1985)

N' f

83 The Experimental Basis for Absorbed Dose-Calculations in Medical uses of Radionuclides (1985)

  • I',

0 (I'

84 General Concepts for the Dosimetry ofInternally Deposited 6

Med, Radionuclides (1985) f 85 Mammography-A User's Guide (1986)

\\S, 7

8"l' Binders for NCRP Reports are available. Two sizes make it possible 4

i to collect into small binders the "old series" of reports (NCRP Reports by 10

Ra6, j

Nos. 8-30) and into large binders the more recent publications (NCRP Reports Nos. 32-86). Each binder will accommodate from five to seven IS' II d

reports. The binders carry the identification "NCRP Reports" and come with label holders which permit the user to attach labels showing the reports contained in each binder.

The following bound sets of NCRP Reports are also available:

13 Prote I

Ce.

]

Volume I. NCRP Reports Nos. 8,9,12,16,22 24' Volume II. NCRP Reports Nos. 23,25,27,30 14

prot, 1

Volume III. NCRP Reports Nos. 32,33,35,36,37 to Volume IV. NCRP Reperta Nos. 38,39,40,41 NC Volume V. NCRP Reports Nos. 42,43,44,45,46 15 Sa/e.

1 Volume VI. NCRP Reports Nos. 47,48,49,50,51 (19 i

Volume VII. NCRP Reports Nos. 52,53,54,55,56,57 17 Perm Volume VIII. NCRP Report No. 58

tio, 5

Volume IX. NCRP Reports Nos. 59,60,61,62,63 yc Volume X. NCRP Reports Nos. 64,65,66,67 Ha Volume XI. NCRP Reports Nos. 68,69,70,71,72 39]

j Volume XII. NCRP Reports Nos. 73,74,75,76 18 X-Rc Volume XIII. NCRP Reports Nos. 77,78,79,80.

No (Titles of the individual reports contained in each volume are given E'#j' 19 j

above).

)

e

asas ROU. TING.AND TRANSMITTAL E.'

10/14/85 in eis oote m gege gros-eum.e,.

3.

J0EL LUBENAU ) TATE PROGRAMS I

k-s.

c.4 4

A4 3.

4 4.

k W l

.)

/

g, pr

". W p

Action Fue AD/dAt/4 Sete and Retum i

Approval For CIserence per Conversehen As Roquested For Correction Propero Reph Circulate For Your leformation SeeIde comment inwetiente sinnetwo r - - y _:

wg asaannns ENCLOSED IS THE LETTER FROM ILLIN0IS SEEKING ADVISE ON A COMPATIBILITY ISSUE. YOU INDICATED THAT YOU WOULD SEE THAT A RESPONSE IS SEN. w)phy.dN g~,b, 9.., m,~ 1

  • /4 L /../

THANK YOU.

'l

//

5 0. N '.st

//n ll 'nt I a v&.,,

et lh-u. a N v..,Ll/ Yb ln h. )

wN%

Sl i]&ty J L.,

y c.

J.

Yl h/bDS 4 =.

i w

no gp g g gj p

. messa.

'*iAftFW "*"'

Wo f

'3 bit (D PROCEDURES BRANCH RULE

$56 DRR:ADM

/

)

OPTIOptAL FOftet 41 (Rev. 7-76) 8883-382

  • ero i s>n o. ws sre tru)

NYckT.at.ses

._