ML20212B476

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 3 to Zion Nuclear Station Recovery Program,Dept Start- Up Readiness Assessment Guideline
ML20212B476
Person / Time
Site: Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/1997
From:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20212B426 List:
References
PROC-971022-03, PROC-971022-3, NUDOCS 9710280093
Download: ML20212B476 (6)


Text

.. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

COMMONWEALTH EDISON ZION NUCLEAR STATION RECOVERY PR6 GRAM 1

DEPARTMENT START-UP READINESS ASSESSMENT GUIDELINE Revision 3 October 22,1997

)

[Aaggggo}oggj, P

_ . ~ . . . . _ _ _ . . _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ .

e i

l TABLE OF CONTFNTS SEC.IlON 1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES i 3.0 GUIDELINES .

ATTACHMENT 1 SUGGESTED ASSESSMENT REPORT FORMAT f

1 4

Zion Department Start-up Readiness Assessment Guideline Revision 3 October 22,1997 Page 1 1 - c wEcOVERnTHREDDPTSAR3 DOC l _

O 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to help assure the plant can be started and returned to full power safely and reliably.

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Denartment Hands Department Heads are responsible foi forming assessment teams, developing assessment plans, conducting assessments, developing and implementing corrective actions to address gaps, and affirming the readiness of their departments to support safe start up and operation.

2.2 Station Senior Managers Station senior managers are responsible for reviewing assessment plans and results and proposed corrective actions for assigned departments to ensure the readiness to support start-up and safe operation and to strengthen organizational capabilities.

2.3 Zion Restart Panel The Zion Restart Panel (ZRP) is responsible for reviewing the assessment results and corrective actions in order to validate readiness of the organization to start up the unit and for recommending start up to the Site

. Vice President 2.4 Station Manager The Station Manager is responsible for providing focus and expectations, for reviewing assessment plans and results, for approving readiness to start up, and for recommending to the Site Vice President that the unit be restarted.

i'.5 Restart Manager The Zion Restart Manager, with support from the Work Control / Outage Manager, coordinates the readinem process as part of recovery and restart process. Plant start up should not occur until each responsible manager  !

has affirmed readiness to restart from his/her department's point of view, Zion Depatiment Start-up Readiness Assessment Guideline Revision 3 October 22,1997 - Page 2 cMEcoVERnTHREEDVTSAR3 Doc

n

,e 2.6 Work Control /Outag(LManagm The Work Control / Outage Manager is responsible for the content of this procedure and shall act as the interpretation contact for any question  :

regarding intent.

aLGUIDELINES Each depariment head will assure the readiness of his/her department prior to start up.

The department head will determine this readinese by leading an effectiveness assessment of his/her organization.

3.1 Scone and Focus The scope and focus of the self assessment will be based on consideration of key performance parameters and issues, recent events and problems, and relevant outage activities. The department head will first meet with the Station Manager to review the l focus, scope, and expectations for the assessment.

12 Guideline I

The department head will then form a self-assessment team and define the preliminary focus of the assessment team based on information available. The assessment team will further develop the scope and focus of the self-assessment and document it in a self-assessment plan. The plan willinclude:

1. Objective
2. Scope:
  • Areas, programs, processes, and capabilities to be assessed Any special focus areas
  • Performance issues and parameters initially considered
3. Criteria for determining readiness in key areas to start up
4. Methods cf obtaining assessment information
5. Team leader and members
6. Schedule The department head will review the self assessment plan with his/her senior manager j and the Station Manager or Restart Manager prior to beginning the assessment. The l initial self-assessment will start in sufficient time prior to start up to allow for resolution of any issues that might be identified.

The department head will review the results of the initial assessment with the responsible senior manager and the ZRP. The department head will develop and complete corrective action plans for issues that must be resolved prior to start up. The Zion Department Start up Readiness Assessment Guideline Revision 3 October 22,1997 Page 3 C VTEcOVERnTHREE\DPTSAR3 Doc

a 4

Station Manager and responsible senior manager will periodically review the progress of the assessment, and any corrective actions being taken to address issues.

The assessment should, as a minimum, assess the organization's readiness to support safe and reliable startup and operation in the followIng areas:

a. Staffing is adequate and personnel are ready.
b. Procedures, processes, and controls are in place,
c. Required training has been c,ompleted.
d. Significant commitments (NTS) are complete.
e. Effective root cause evaluations have been completed for all significant conditions and the associated corrective r.ctions have been completed or an evaluation and determination have been made that the condition will not significantly affect safe start up and operation When all start up issues tave been addressed, the department head will document the self assessment and closure of start up issues in a self-assessment report and present the results of the assessment to the ZRP. The department head will then sign the assessment affirming that, based on the assessment and to the best of his/her knowledge and judgment, his/her organization is ready to support safe and reliable start-up and operation. Attachment 1 is a suggested format for the final assessment report.

The Restart Managar shall review and summarize the departmental readiness assessments for all department and will summarize and discuss any exceptions for startup with the Station Manager.

The ZRP will review the restart readiness assessments. After the ZRP reviews the assessments, they will submit their recommendations to restart to the Station Manager and the Site Vice President.

The Site Vice President will review and approve readiness assessments and grant permission for restart.

The Restart Manager will transmit the completed assessment packages to records management for retention as a quality record.

) Zion Department Stsrt-up Readiness Assessment Guideline Revision 3 October 22,1997 Page 4 C:WECoVERnTHREEDPTSAR3 doc

o a

ATTACHMENT 1 DEPARTMENT READINESS ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INSTRUCTION SUGGESTED SELF ASSESSMENT. REPORT FORMAT Unit Department Depar+ ment Head Senior V.* nager Statement of Affirmation by the department head:

" Based on the results of this self-assessment and completion of required corrective actions and to the best of my knowledge, the l Department is ready to support a safe start up and reliable operation.

Signature:

Date:

l 1. 9ummary results of tSe self assessment:

\ 1.1. Summary of department readiness and capabilities l 1.2. Key performance arens assessed 1.3. Significant conclusions 1.4. Corrective actions taken to address significant findings

2. Overview of Assessment Plan (from the Plan)

2.1. Scope

2.2. Areas, programs, processes, and capabilities to be assessed 2.2.1. Any special focus areas 2.2.2. Performance issues and parameters initially considered 2.2.3. Criteria for determining readiness in key areas 2.3. Afethods of obtaining assessment Information 2.4. Team members

3. Findings of the Assessment 3.1. Findings I

3.2. Analysis of Findings (significance, ImpIIcations, aggregate knpact or underlying capeblHty or performance pape)

.1.3. Conclusions 3.3.1. Comparison with criteria 3.3.2. Assessment of readiness in areas assessed 3.3.3. Issues which must be addressed prior to start up

4. Corrective Actions Taken (for each issue) 4.1. Actions taken 4.2. Results 4.3. Effectiveness in addressing target issue 4.4. Long-term requirements 4.5. Statement that issue is closed Zion Department Start up Readiness Self-Assessment Guideline \

Revision 1. 10/2H97 Page 5

.