ML20210B856
| ML20210B856 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 04/24/1987 |
| From: | George Thomas PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| References | |
| CON-#287-3330 OL, NUDOCS 8705060031 | |
| Download: ML20210B856 (32) | |
Text
'
333d
' 4HPEocamwom '
00CKETED USNRC Dated: April 24, 1987
'87 APR 30 A11 :21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Y.QO
'%^iI '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Q
before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD I
l
)
In the Matter of )
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. ) 50-444-OL
) Off-site Emergency l (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) ) Planning Issues l
)
) -
APPLICANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO INTERVENOR INTERROGATORIES t MASSAC!IUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY No. 2 Q: Identify and produce all documents on which you have relied, do rely, or will rely to support your position on each of these contentions. Identify the information in each document on which you have relied, do rely, or will rely and the specific subpart of cach contention which that information concerns, i
Applicants' Supplemental Responses to Mass. AG Interrogatories and SAPL Interrogatory No. 41 herein are made pursuant to Board Memorandum and Order of April 7, 1987. Excepted therefrom are those matters which are the subjects of the Applicants' Motion for Reconsideration, now, sub judice.
0705060031 B70424 PDH 0
ADOCK 05000443 , bh PDR ,
f
- t. i I
R: See appended Schedule with attachments A & B.
INTERROGATORY No. 3 Q: State whether you have relied, do rely, or will rely on, ~
any study, calculation, or analysis to support your position on each of these contentions. If so, please:
- a. Describe the nature of the study, calculation or
! analysis and identify any documents that discuss or describe the study, calculation or analysis;
- b. Identify the persons who performed the study, calculation or analysis;
- c. State when and where the study, calculation or analysis was performed.
R: Studies, analyses, and calculations on which applicants rely for positions on contentions:
SAPL 8 and 8A I
(2) 1. FEMA RAC Evaluation of NHRERP, Rev. 2 \
i (2) 2. Personnel Resource Assessment Program Summary Developed in Support of Motions for Summary Disposition, 4/87.
SAPL 31 (1) 1. Mileti Affidavit One: The General Character of Public Behavior in Emergencies, 3/25/86 Two: Voluntary Public Evacuation 3/25/86 Three: Emergency Worker Role Abandonment 3/25/86
- 2. NHRERP Vol. 6 (ETE)
(2) 3. Byunuso, I. and Hattgen, D.: "An Update on Household-Reported Trip-Generation Rates" in Transportation Research Record 987, 1984.
(2) 4. Hans, Joseph M. et al.: Evacuation Risks -- An Evaluation, June 1974 (3) 5. NHCDA Special Help Survey, July 1986
SAPL 34 (5) 1. 1984 population estimates of the New Hampshire towns provided by the New Hampshire Office of State Planning.
(5) 2. Town Clerk population estimates for EPZ 4 municipalities, early 1985. l
)
SAPL 33 -
(2) 1. New Hampshire Rules for Control of Radiation (i.e. He-P 2020, He-P 2023 (2) 2. Guidance on NUREG 0654 FEMR-RERP; Evaluation Criterion J-12, FEMA Memorandum from Richard W.
Krimm to NTH Division Chiefs and FEMA Regional Offices, December 21, 1985.
TOHVI l l
- 1. NHRERP Vol. 6 (ETE)
(2) 2. Town of Hampton Annual Report for 1986 .
(2) 3. Personnel Resource Assessment Program Summary Developed in Support of Motions for Summary Disposition, 4/87 (1) 4. Mileti Affidavit One: The General Character of Public Behavior in Emergencies.
3/25/86 RERP 8/TOHVIII/SAPL 16
- 1. NHRERP Vol. 6 (ETE)
(2) 2. METPAC User Manual, May 1 (2) 3. "A Study to Identify Potential Shelters in the Beach Areas Near Seabrook Station" performed for NHY by SWEC, 3/86 TOHIII
- 1. NHRERP Vol. 6 (ETE)
(1) 2. Mileti Affidavits One, Two and Three, 3/25/86 Sensitivity runs using IDYNEV to examine non-compliance with the recommended routing (see E. Lieberman Affidavit p. 21, 3/25/86).
(4) 3. Sensitivity runs: major road blockages, non-compliance with traffic control procedures, and varying levels of spontaneous evacuation.
(see E. Lieberman Affidavit p. 24, 3/25/86).
(1) Submitted with MSD's (2) Available in Discovery Room at Seabrook Station (3) Survey instrument form previously serviced with Applicant's MPSD of TOSH-8, NHLP-4, SAPL-18 and SAPL-25 (4) Available at KLD offices (5) Summary and results provided in the NHRERP Vol. 6 INTERROGATORY No. 91 Q: Is it your position that sheltering of the transient summer beach population is feasible at all' beach areas located within ten miles of the plant?
R: Yes. This response is based on adequacy of shelter facilities per NHRERP, Vol. 1, Section 2.6.5 and the -
availability of sufficient facilities as documented in the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation study of March, 1986, entitled "A Study to Identify Potential Shelters in the Beach Areas near Seabrook Station".
INTERROGATORY No. 92 Q: Please identify those beach areas within ten miles of the Seabrook plan for which sheltering of the transient population would not be a feasible response.
R: See supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 91.
INTERROGATORY No. 96 Q: Is it your position that adequate physical facilities exist in all beach areas located within Seabrook's ten mile EPZ to shelter the entire peak transient summer beach population?
R: Yes. Documents which support this answer are referred to in supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 91.
4
. _ . . . . --- ._ _ - = . - - - - _ _ _ _ .__
o INTERROGATORY No. 97 in Q: Please provide the basis for your response to Interrogatory No. 96 that adequate physical facilities do or do not exist.
R: The basis for the response as to the adequacy of
, physical facilities that exist is cited in supplemental i
response to Interrogatory No. 91.
d INTERROGATORY No. 98 Q: Please provide any documents you have reviewed that are
- in any way relevant to the conclusion (s) set forth in response to Interrogatory No. 96.
R: NHRERP Volumes and the Stone and Webster Engineering
, study of March, 1986 have been served on the parties.
- Study wcrksheets and notes used to compile this study have been placed in the Seabrook Station discovery room i and are available for inspection.
l INTERROGATORY No. 99 l Q: Please identify all documents you intend to rely upon to -
support your position that adequate physical facilities 2
do or do not exist to shelter the entire peak transient summer. beach population.
R: Refer to supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 91.
! INTERROGATORY No. 100 Q: Please identify all facilities that could be used to e
shelter the transient summer beach population and i provide the dose reduction factor for each, identifying l for each the basis for your determination of the dose
- reduction factor and providing all computations,
( materials, photographs, notes and other materials relied upon or reviewed in determining the dose reduction
- factor of each building or facility.
- R
- All elements of this interrogatory are addressed in the
! referenced Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation 4
study. The worksheets and notes used to compile this i study have been placed in the Seabrook Station discovery
! room and are available for inspection.
l
) INTERROGATORY No. 101 l
6 Q: Is it your position that sheltering of the transient 4, summer beach population located within ten miles of the l
l }
. , - - - - , - -y.re,.-we-w---r--y-,,...-.+-.%w-ywe,.w,,,v,r-.~3--,-.---.., - , . , - - . ., -.w.,<
Seabrook plant could never be an adequate protective response action for that population, or for any portion of that population, under any plausible accident scenario?
R: No. Applicants do not rule out the use of sheltering as a protective response action.
INTERROGATORY No. 102 Q: Please provide the basis for your response to Interrogatory No. 101, and unless your answer to that interrogatory is an unqualified yes, state under what circumstances, including accident sequences and meteorological conditions, sheltering could provide an adequate protective response for the transient summer beach population, or any portion thereof, located within ten miles of the Seabrook plant.
R: The basis for Applicants' supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 101 that it is not Applicants' position that sheltering could never be an adequate protective response for the beach population is that there exist decision criteria in NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.6.7 and Volumes 4 and 4A, Appendices F and U .
respectively, which provide the capability to make adequate protective action recommendations. Applicants' supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 91 establishes the position that the recommendations that could be made are implementable.
INTERROGATORY No. 103 Q: Please provide any documents you have reviewed that are in any way relevant to the conclusions set forth in response to Interrogatories Nos. 101 and 102.
R: The documents cited in response to Interrogatories Nos.
91 and 102, have been served on the parties to this proceeding.
INTERROGATORY No. 104 Q: Please identify all documents you intend to rely upon to support your position that sheltering of the transient summer beach population could or could not ever be an adequate protective response option for that population.
R: Refer to supplemental responses to Interrogatories Nos. I 2, 3, 91, 98 and 102.
INTERROGATORY No. 105
o +
Q: Is it your position with regard to the transient summer beach population, or for any portion of that population, that the protective response of sheltering could never achieve the same level of dose reduction as the protective response of evacuation?
R: No, it is not.
INTERROGATORY No. 106 Q: Please provide the basis for your response to Interrogatory No. 105.
R: Refer to Applicants' supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 102.
INTERROGATORY No. 107 Q: Please provide any documents you have reviewed that are relevant to the conclusion (s) set forth in response to Interrogatory No. 105.
R: Refer to Applicants' supplemental response to Interrogatory Nos. 91, 98 and 102.
INTERROGATORY No. 108 Q: Please identify all documents you intend to rely upon to support your position set forth in response to Interrogatory No. 105.
R: Refer to Applicants' supplemental response to Interrogatory Nos. 2, 3, 91, 98 and 102.
INTERROGATORY No. 112.
Q: Please provide the bases for your response to Interrogatories Nos. 109 and 110, including all documents you rely upon in support of those responses.
R: The documents cited in Applicants' supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 91 provide the bases for Applicants' responses to Interrogatories Nos. 109 and 110.
INTERROGATORY No. 112a Q: If your answer to either Interrogatory Nos. 109 or 110 is anything but an unqualified yes, please identify and describe those situations for which the response of evacuation will not be " adequate" or achieve an
" adequate level of protection" and the manner in which the response will not be adequate?
R: Refer to Applicants' supplemental responses to Interrogatories Nos. 91 and 102. It is to be noted that the sentence " Sheltering may not be considered a feasible protective action on the Seacoast beaches during the summer" in Section 2.6.5 p. 2.6-7 Volume 1 of the Plan is to be read as an observation and not as a command. It does not rule out all consideration of shelter as an adequate protective action.
INTERROGATORY No. 113 Q: If your answers to Interrogatories Nos. 109 and 110 are
- anything but an unqualified yes, please describe what, if any, other or additional actions will be taken to protect the population in those situations where the protective response of evacuation is not deemed by you to be an adequate protective measure or expected to achieve an adequate level of protection?
R: Refer co Applicants' supplemental responses to Interrogatory Nos. 91, 102 and 112a. There are a range of options that may be implemented for the transient -
- summer beach population. These are described in the Plan. They include the early precautionary measures cited in Volume 1, Section 2.6, and Volume 4A, Appendix U; the shelter-in-place concept which Applicants have shown to be feasible (see response to Interrogatory No.
. 91 and Callendrello Affidavit to Applicants' Motion for i
Summary Disposition to TOH-VIII/RERP 8/SAPL-16); or a full evacuation. The criteria for selecting one or a combination of these options is a function of the discrete circumstances at the time. The decision criteria of Volume 4A, Appendix U allows these circumstances to be accounted for and is based in part on the conservative ETE of NHRERP Volume 6.
INTERROGATORY No. 119
- Q
- Please describe when, including under what types of l accident sequences and scenarios and meteorological l conditions, the protective response of sheltering would, if used instead of just evacuation for the transient summer beach population, result in lower radiation 4
exposure to that population.
R: Sheltering may be the preferred protective action for a
! fast-breaking puff types release where it may afford a greater dose savings than evacuation and where there is i not enough time for implementation of other early
}
precautionary measures. It may also be preferred for continuous releases where the decision-makers determine that the disruptive effects of an evacuation and its own inherent risks are not warranted. (See EPA Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protection Actions for Nuclear Incidents). '
l INTERROGATORY No. 137 Q: Please identify, by indicating on maps or otherwise, each and every possible parking space in the beach area within ten miles of the Seabrook plant that KLD i Associates identified or counted in determining the peak i numbers of vehicles, or other figures relevant to the number of persons, in the EPZ beach areas.
R: Aerial slides used by KLD Associates in determining parking spaces have been and will remain available for inspection at the Seabrook Station. These slides are l found within container boxes which identify the dates on i which the slides were taken.
Volume 6, Appendix E, Item 7, provides detailed information regarding those aerial films used by KLD in identifying estimated parking capacity. These aerial -
films, as stated in Item 7, were taken on " Saturday, j August 11, 1985 in the early afternoon".
Included in the aerial slides available for review at Seabrook are two boxes of slides with information indicating the slides were taken on August 11, 1985 at j 2:00 pm. These 57 slides are the slides which are so referenced in the Memorandum and Order. Each of these slides bears a number which corresponds to the attached cross-reference list of land area descriptions and as indicated on the USC&GS chart, which are also available among the discovery materials on location at the Seabrook Station.
SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY No. 41 7
Q: Have the individual members of Teamsters Local No. 633 been informed of the driving duties they may be asked to assume under NHRERP Rev. 27. Have the individual members of Teamsters Local No. 633 in any way indicated their willingness to perform these duties? If so, how?
Detail the specific locations of each of the bus companies that teamsters union members may be asked to
drive for and state how many teamsters union members live within five miles of each of the bus companies.
Detail the arrangements for contacting the teamsters union drivers in the event of a radiological emergency at Seabrook.
R: The specific locations of each of the bus companies that teamsters union members may be asked to drive for in an emergency are listed in the Letters of Agreement contained in NHRERP Volume 5.
h/
George s. Thomas Vice President, Nuclear Production New Hampshire Yankee Division of Public Service Company of New Hampshire April 24, 1987 State of New Hampshire Rockingham County, ss. .
Then appeared before me the above subscribed George S.
Thomas and made oath that he is the Vice President, Nuclear Production of New Hampshire Yankee Division, authorized to execute the foregoing errata to responses to interrogatories on behalf of the Applicants, that he made inquiry and believes that the foregoing answers accurately set forth
- such information as is available to the Applicants.
Before me, bomd b dow My Comm4jsion Expiread 3-l,-90
0 e
I SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS BY CONTENTION NUMBER
LISTING OF DOCUMENTS BY CONTENTION NUMBER CONTENTION MATERIAL NO. ISSUE CROSS REFERENCE NOS.
TOH - III ETE Attachment A: 2,9,10,11,12, 20,35,36,37,40,41,42,47,49, 50,53,55 Attachment B: all TOH - IV TRNS Attachment A: 35,54 ETE Attachment A: 2,9,10,11,12,13, 14,15,19,20,36,37,40,41,42,47, 49,50,53,55 Attachment B: all TOH - VI PSNL Attachment A: 1,2,13,14,15,18, 19,32,35,43,44 ETE Attachment A: 10,11,12,20, 36,37,40,42,47,49,50,53,55 Attachment B: all TOH - VIII SHLT Attachment A: 2,10,34,35,36,37, 38,40,42,47,45,46,51,52 Attachment 3: 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 43,49,51 TOHF-2 PSNL Attachment A: 2,13,14,15,16,17, 18,19,35,44 NOTE: Documentsf:itedunderAttachmentA: 3, 4, 5, 6, 21, 22, 23, 24;, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 35, 44, and 54 are
, general planning documents and may be called upon to support the Applicants' position on any of the
- contentions.
1 LEGEND OF ISSUES COMM - Communications DECON - Decontamination ETE - Evacuation Time Estimate LOA - Letter of Agreement NOT - Notification PSNL - Personnel SHLT - Sheltering SPEC - Special Needs
.- ~ . . - _.
o LISTING OF DOCUMENTS BY CONTENTION NUMBER CONTENTION MATERIAL NO. ISSUE CROSS REFERENCE NOS.
TOHF-4 NOT/COMM Attachment A: 35 TOK-1 PSNL Attachment A: 2,13,14,15,16,17, 16,19,35,43,44 TOK-2 NOT/COMM Attachment A: 35 TOK-4 SHLT Attachment A: 35,38,51,52 TOK-6 LOA Attachment A: 35 TOK-10 NOT/COMM Attachment A: 35 TOR-2 SPEC Attachment A: 35 TOSH-1 LOA Attachment A: 35 TOSH-2 PSNL Attachment A: 2,13,14,15,16,17, -
18,19,35,43,44 TOSH-3 LOA Attachment A: 35 TOSH-6 NOT/COMM Attachment A: 35 TOSH-8 SPEC /TRNS Attachment A: 35 NECNP-RERP-2 PSNL Attachment A: 35,43,44
LISTING OF DOCUMENTS BY CONTNNTION NUMBER CONTENTION MATERIAL NO. ISSUE CROSS REFERENCE NOS.
NECNP-RERP-8 SHLT Attachment A: 2,35,37,38,45,46,51,52 Attachment B: 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 18,19,35,43,44 NECNP-NHLP-2 PSNL Attachment A: 2,13,14,15,16,17, 18,19,35,43,44 NECNP-NHLP-4 NOT/COMM Attachment A: 35 NECNP-NHLP-6 SPEC /TRNS Attachment A: 35 SAPL-7 and -33 DECON Attachment A: 17,34,35,44,48 SAPL-8/8A PSNL Attachment A: 2,13,14,15,16,17, 18,19,35,44 ETE Attachment A: 2,9,10,11,12,20,35,36, 37,40,41,42,47,49,50, 53,55 .
Attachment B: all SAPL-15 LOA Attachment A: 35 SAPL-16 SHLT Attachment A: 2,35,37,38,45,46,51,52 Attachment B: 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,49,51 SAPL-18 SPEC /TRNS Attachment A: 35 Attachment B: 36 SAPL-25 SPEC /TRNS Attachment A: 8,35
LISTING OF DOCUMENTS BY CONTENTION NUMBER CONTENTION MATERIAL NO. ISSUE CROSS REFERENCE NOS.
SAPL-31 ETE Attachment A: 2,9,10,11,12,20,35,36,37, 40,41,42,47,49,50,53,55 Attachment B: all SAPL-34 ETE Attachment,A 2,9,10,11,20,35,36,40,41, 42,47,49,50,53,55 Attachment B: all i
SAPL-37 TRNS/ LOA Attachment A: 35 ETE Attachment A: 2,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,19, i
20,35,36,37,40,41,42,47, 49,50,53,55 Attachment B: all l
4 1
)
Attachment A DOCUMENTS CITED IN INTERROGATORIES AND MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION SEABROOK, NH
- 1. Hampton School District Annual Report
- 2. Traffic Management Manual
- 3. New Hampshire Response Actions to RAC Review of State .
and Local RERP, 8/86
- 4. Work Plan submitted to FEMA /RAC by SONH 7/1/86
- 5. New Hampshire Response Actions to RAC Review of State and Local RERP, 8/86
- 6. Draft State Response to the Review of the SONH RERP l for Seabrook (Rev. 2, 8/86)
[7. Federal RERP 50FR46542 11/8/85]
- 8. Exeter Hospital RERP
- 9.Section VI, RAC Comments, 1986
- 10. Aerial photographs (ETE)
- 11. Kaltman Report
- 12. (1985) Highway Capacity Manual
- 13. NHCDA Radiological Emergency Response Training Module, #1 " Basic RERP"
- 14. NHCDA Radiological Emergency Response Training Module, #2 " Radiological Exposure Control"
- 15. NHCDA Radiological Emergency Response Training Module, #13 " Traffic Mangement"
- 16. NHCDA Radiological Emergency Response Training Module, #11 "New Hampshire Decontamination Center" NOTE: DOCUMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE NOT PROVIDED FOR INSPECTION DURING DISCOVERY BY THE APPLICANT DUE TO THE NATURE OR UNAVAILABILITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
i __ ._ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ __ -
- 17. New Hampshire Rules for Control of Radiation (i.e.,
He-P 2020, He-P 2023)
- 18. NHCDA Radiological Emergency Response Training Module, #5, " Procedure Checklist"
- 19. NHCDA Radiological Emergency Response Training Module, #19 " Transportation Overview"
- 20. March 1984 Evacuation Time Study (Costello, Lomasney, and DeNapoli, Inc.)
- 21. FEMA technical review of New Hampshire's draft State and local planning for Seabrook, 6/27/85
- 22. FEMA /RAC review of 12/85 submission of New Hampshire State Plan, 4/30/86
- 23. Draft RAC review of 2/86 submission by New Hampshire, 4/30/86 24.* FEMA /RAC review of the New Hampshire submission of 2/86 25.* Draft FEMA /RAC review of the New Hampshire submission of 4/16 -
- 27. FEMA /RAC review of Rev. 2 of the NHRERP of 8/86, dated 12/86
- 28. Final Report, Independent Review of Seabrook Station EP Program, 10/85
- 29. IRT Report #030, dated 2/13/86 (#IRT-030)
[30. 52FR6980, 3/6/87]
[32. Southern California Edison (San Onofre NPS)
CLI-83-lO, 17 NRC 528, 533 (1983)]
[33. PP&L (Susquehanna), ALAB-613, 12 NRC 317, 334 (1980)]
- 34. Seabrook Station-FSAR
- 35. " PLAN" (NHRERP)
- 36. First Market Research Corporation Study - Boston (Telephone Survey)
Items 24 and 25 are one (1) document.
- 37. IDYNEV model/ input / output (available at KLD)
- 38. A Study to Identify Potential Shelters in the Beach Areas Near Seabrook Station (Stone & Webster Engineering Corp., 3/86)
- 39. Seabrook Station Emergency Response Plan (Chapters 6, 7 and 8)
[40. Survey (DRED - Division of Parks and Recreation)]
[41. Letter from TOH on sewage flow in 6/84 and 6/85]
- 42. Raw Data from Survey of Traffic Movements on Beach l Roadways (Merrimac Engineering Services)
- 43. Town of Hampton Annual Report for 1986
- 44. " Personnel Resource Assessment Program Developed in Support of Motions for Summary Disposition, 4/87,"
Seabrook Station
- 45. METPAC, A Computer Software Package which Evaluates the Consequences of an Off-Site Radioactive Release Written for the Seabrook Station Site at Seabrook, .
NH, Technical Description, May 1986. '
- 46. METPAC User Manual, May 1986
- 47. Hans, Joseph M. et al: Evacuation Riska -- An Evaluation, June, 1974
- 48. Guidance on NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1 Evaluation Criteria J. 12., FEMA memo from Richard W. Kriann to NTH Division Chiefs, Dec. 24, 1985
- 49. KLD Bus Mobilization Survey (draft summary)
- 50. KLD Campground / Motel Survey (draft summary)
- 51. Shelter Survey Forms (Worksheets for Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation Study, 3/86) 4
- 52. Seabrook Station Sheltering Study, 11/15/84, HMM Associates
- 53. Byunoso, I. and Hartgen, D.: "An Update on Household-Reported Trip-Generation Rates" in Transportation Research, Record 987, 1984 I
- 54. Final Exercise Assessment, Joint N.H. State and Local Radiological Emergency Response Exercise for the
Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plan, February 26, 1986
- 55. .New Hampshire RERP, Volume 6, Appendices F and G
. . . . - - - _ - . .~
ATTACHMENT B KLD SUBMITTED MATERIALS
- 1. Submission by First Market Research
- 2. Beach Area Traffic Count Program: Seabrook Station EPZ (Dec. 1982)
- 3. Hampton Beach Traffic Study (Aug. 1984)
- 4. 1983 Beach Area Traffic Count Program: Seabrook Station EPZ (Feb. 1984) ,
l S. Seabrook Station Evacuation Analysis, Final Report (Aug. 1980)
- 6. Beach Capacity Analysis for Shoreline Areas Around Seabrook, New Hampshire (June 1982)
- 7. I.n Independent Assessment of Evacuation Time Estimates 1 for a Peak Population Scenario in the Emergency Planning Zone of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station
- 8. Evacuation Clear Time Estimates for Areas Near Seabrook .
Station
- 9. Appendix E, Emergency Planning Zone Evacuation Time
{ Study, Seabrook Nuclear Power Station, Seabrook, New Hampshire i 10. Letter from James MacDonald, Civil Defense Agency and
! Office of Emergency Preparedness
- 11. April 1981 New Hampshire Population Projections ,
- 12. Nov. 1983 HMM Comparison of 1980 Census and FSAR
! Population Data 13, 8-8-85 Letter: From R. Goldblatt, KLD; To J.
- Quinn, NH Yankee (e)
- 14. 8-9-85 Letter: From Lowry Aerial Photo Service; To. R. Goldblatt, KLD i
- 15. 9-3-85 Letter: From Mass. Office of Human Services; To " Data Request, Cust." (e) i
- 16. Oct. 1985 Marketing Research Study by First Market Research
_g_
- 17. 10-17-85 Letter: From Town of West Newbury; To E.
Lieberman, KLD (e)
- 18. 10-28-85 Letter: From West Newbury Emer. Resp.
Comm.; To E. Lieberman, KLD (e)
- 19. 11-13-85 Notes on Seabrook Meeting
- 20. 12-10-85 Reports on town meetings at Stratham and Newfields; From G. Coogan
- 21. 12-19-85 Letter: From G. Coogan; To E. Lieberman, KLD (e)
- 22. 12-19-85 Letter: From G. Coogan; To E. Lieberman, KLD
- 23. 12-31-85 FEMA memo RI-TH-85-28
- 24. 2-11-86 Letter: From N.H. Civil Defense; To Town of Hampton Falls
- 25. 2-27-86 Letter: From E. Lieberman; To Ms. J.
Shotwell (e)
- 26. 3-1-86 Letter: From N.H. Civil Defense; To E.
Lieberman -
- 27. 3-24-86 Letter: From Y. Chang; to M. Meyer
- 28. 4-8-86 Letter: From E. Lieberman; To C. Barry
- 29. 4-9-86 Preliminary RAC Review
- 30. 4-14-86 Letter: From E. Lieberman; To Y. Chang
- 31. 4-17-86 Letter: From E. Thomas, FEMA; to R.
Boulay, Mass Civil Defense (e)
- 32. 4-24-86 Letter: From R. Strome, N.H.C.D.A.; to E.
Lieberman 33, 4-28-86 Info on police and fire resources
- 34. 5-5-86 Lettsr: From E. Lieberman; To B. Hausner, Civil Defense (e)
- 35. 5-20-86 Memo: From Y. Chang; to M. Meyer (e)
- 36. 5-22-86 Survey results on Special Help Needs
- 37. 5-28-86 Memo: From R. Dutremble (e)
- 38. 5-30-86 Letter: From E. Lieberman; To M. Nawoj, N . it . C . D . (e)
- 39. 6-2-86 Letter: From E. Thomas; To R. Strome, N.H.C.D. (e)
- 40. 7-23-86 Correspondence and Letters of Agreement on emergency transportation
- 41. 8-8-86 Letter: From E. Thomas; To R. Strome (e)
- 42. 8-15-86 Letter: From E. Lieberman; To R. Strome (e)
- 43. 8-18-86 Comments in response to FEMA RAC Review
- 44. 8-20-86 Telecopier Leader Sheets
- 45. 8-21-86 Letter: From R. Strome; To E. Lieberman
- 46. 12-29-86 Note: From B. Heizer; To E. Lieberman on 1-5-87 meeting
- 47. 2-2-87 Letter: From E. Lieberman; To T.
Callendrello
- 48. Traffic Control Post Data from police departments .
- 49. Assortment of notes on beach data (incl. 3 photos)
- 50. Table of " percentage of sampled vehicles by state"
- 51. Report on " Demographic & Vehicular Demand Estimates for Evacuation Analysis of Seabrook Station"
- 52. 3 Miscellaneous items
- 53. Article: "The Environmental Influence of Rain of Freeway Capacity"
- 54. Article: " Influence of Incidents on Freeway Quality of Service"
- 55. Article: " Transportation Analysis for Evaluation:
State of the Art"
- 56. Article: "1985 Fatal Traffic Accident Summary" - New Hampshire
- 57. Article: "New Hampshire Population Projections l 1980-2010"
- 58. Responses to Preliminary Review of Progress Report No.
7
- 59. Questions for'the West Newbury Info Forum 1
- 60. Photographs of selected intersections
- 61. Copies of First Market Research Survey i
[62. Sensitivity runs: major road blockages, non-compliance with traffic control procedures, and varying levels of spontaneous evacuation.]
4 i
4 s
J 1
i i
t l
ll 3
l
. , _ _ _ , - .___.--.__...-____-,,,._m., _ _ _ _ _ . . , _ . . , . _ _ _ , , , , _ , ,
O e
CROSS-REFERENCE LIST OF LAND AREA DESCRIPTIONS AND USC&GS CHART
O bd A c
~~ ~
a naf W A c,, A s ?n s' s /n
,[ ,l ll
~~
8 '
Q&L ' ~
/ & >/uj I,w, s
- G_: n,> d a_ - a a =
_ =.. _ _ . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . . . _ .
1<~ um ,/)x./ae,l m .. -
//l ):1
-- 0 ,'
~
~
sLxt, n,,,v/ & ar a.m ~
/t~ rA M ~
(l / '
LA la r h' p ' . . .
W75 _ . . . =-- N
_L P M e d, ~dy 22A ~
ob K.&Es-a pG f n . . . . .
.?. OfG AA suJ/ a hw /15 .- m-us *
-,.Zi1_Af .uALv1 -sAU ocaA . mal (Lhk --
qj - 'r w i/
-3 n da& nM A 6xA. L d n' ~ da
,,il, . fn1 shi- A.c.,
~
-~
,,1 A%/f ' ' f
- . 7,
- .
- (7
./ Gm x&sm"-c Aho a3 % d/w/
E N A Led 10 d a7Y d fa26 A duela u sw ~ sm /c s nN O JO
' ~
Q [i /
., - ,. e.-memmum w
_e -4 . . . . . .
} L]b -a, d A .- .-- ... .. ...
7 E' h. L Pf- L r / b s,,.e__f ,___
J A-s J
^
JA '
PL .rsf D f o_& A
% ad 29- / . -.
._- t
- s. w ..; -
7 s r s., sia ,~
,~
W
&J J ' %w in~ ... G LL ' ~
,L , ..
o~~ _ . . .
~ ~~~~
/9 %./lu ir ps 2 +L 61a ..
49 III . . . . - . . . . - .
" &f, f-Lf/ K . ...
/_f._. --
J -
/Z cp Et I wi T5 u K s+ n.! G l ~ e ... + ... .
/& Ss />, Ec ~ % 6 5% Ides. L~- ArlM: .W_.
4 . . . .
If N A J M 14. M /Ecs
/fN --
S.frc I, % ,?
AJ. >+ lf~
. . . . . . l.~ ~
f4 / .G [dL~1 L C wJL '
?
2 +. i A L ui n J-d . . . . - .
/4 -
)
n - P -
= = - .
/7 % 4 6, % ,4 - Sh # b c:.~ ..
s-) i 6
% c/pg,,
/Y Sa.L,k, fmA hlad g n
e n
- ~
li -
l i g ct _
n ,,
s, <
f ..n .
$ / - w ff Ici % A J. twn- ~A .&72 2 2>:, cD 2 mE~~
n . u --r:.o s - A
, c> - n i...
k_ J 5. n , L,S. '" ~ ~ ~
n_ o %bd,2_ . _._
3 gI /s41-7v %! Akk 6 M s F A 8 .... ... ...
l . . / 6 n L %M ul x H. B. sr .rk-p 3
- 0
& t/4 h.. ..,)
_.2 3 N . B . St. A jr -
g .
._ .. . 2A. --. l/ . R - ' ~C r. PA
Zw T7 ET 5L _. :.
2C N. B. W PK' mg A fY' C/ ._.. __ _
y -
.. > L. . - .A / M 1 1 / k A -
- .. . - - . .. - .. . ~
~~ ~~
. . . .. 4/=& .- ^! nil 7% A Q - .to i K -.
27 (d ///. / boa (4
~ ~ ~~
' 'V 9
~
e /n/G.. ~
~h ~
.2 ?< N. & AJ ioi c 29 V (n u s ,h>s ... ...
Y f A
- - - _ f. ,, .. ,
. e ee.ee .
A ^$ -
.t -- --
c) $ nn sw Amw -- -
g---a b '. _ c Y r .-
e9 e -m-
. *.. s A. y ', ,5 c.f m .-* not.f.Q.,,je" * '" ;* ; **.=
- 4.w f,
. p~.~. n. .~r...
oe
,.+qic. e.
. o
// a*.d.4.., ..17. L
'2 }.. .}):t..
. 7' .
W h .
\ '
/- ., '.D. y \. , .,
. ./ .r s
- \ '
f 5r . s t.<). . .:.
,f .f k,f
~ ' - *
. .. . .p. l.c #
s ' ssn
,a s a>
}//y,x;:f.t I
l 18.'.:
?' %* a
.y. '
- .s 6 m
.l. T* .$; %
19ecco ntt N../ l N '
.na :,yi
.i ?
q)w*hencord%+
Pt
\gf **4, .y 5t f 4 r.., 'i.u,,
4 1 I.l 1 :f' %
{? ! :,'
Q '9 p x.t ,Ia.un.. % g%
t l
. 1
- r. 2
- I I 8 gg-
- I I[tDI*af
! ARye .. ,,. *P asue r,es.
or
. o% A RC'sA 3 3 -A sse n ce: nti iN eu: is $60 4 T 3 3" ist 3 Map the Map Service d
e *#
Edi:ed a d published " Geolcgical Survey .
j Control
- USC&GS Vg "
c=l Ct.it sr sad crairage in cart compiled from aer. 2,y i '
prot races taken 1943. Topography ey planetacie is* ' 'li surve s 1944. Culture revised by the Geological 8* "*5 i ',,,[,$, 3 Sun y 1956
\q cregraony compiled from USC&GS charts 1205 (1954). \j' 329 (1955). and 1206 (1955) '
Polyconic croiection. 1927 Nortn Arnerican datum utm Ca'o ano IsPI maC=stic =cete csev=ar.on af csntse os sass.
10.000. foot gnas cased on Ma;re cocrainate system.
mest tone, and New Harecshire coordinate system 1000 r eter Unaeasai Transverse Mercator gric t'chs.
acre 19, snean in ciue p . ...."' .M.a ,57,,1 G dz $ ..u.e#
~
~
.7:
~.
-y 'my
/!h. amj.
i-e/ %-
M
% c7 "p :.
- # n 1. Ws.7 ,a-ml:&c,/' 3Q,
/~ .N. 1*
..;. .y .
3 C * .
.s.g -: G4Q
~.Aaa s cefoy 4
'? k Y % N"J
' f It fh* ,
Tc Sb MG ,
't a f Le ,z % ,2 o @.ptk f . F0
_ g.j l
(/ia 3- m,L E'-t
- I 'A n 1 - is4 a n
, ,.,z,,, , u , g5 g-,3c 34n . ' ' Y^ 9A , F y ,o , ,, ,,e, />, tf ,p , ,y,,
, i'6,
/6
' /6 /g
, I ?, tr, ! ? +, trG, /P i3 5' /9, /9,11 4, i /
/7'd,2e z_t II422, c'Y 0 7 / w lf- /*bl, G'd-Ok : 22 , ZZ-k h, A 3, E f 2r 24 zc, 24g ya-o g3 / ! s / 1 7,2pI z 9, 33 *
- 3/
i 32.
, n-4, 33,33x , W, 3 4, 34 (% u), y c ,
37.
5? slk i 00 S p' ) lbtE
00ME TED UWPC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, George H. Lewald, one of the attorneys for the 87 Am 30 All:21 Applicants herein, hereby certify that on April 24, 987, I made service of the within document by depositing f as' SV31"'Oa' thereof with Federal Express, prepaid, for delivery 8 3hje where indicated, by depositing in the United States mail, l,j' first class postage paid, addressed to):
i Administrative Judge Helen Hoyt, Robert Carrigg, Chairman Chairperson, Atomic Safety and Board of Selectmen Licensing Board Panel Town Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Atlantic Avenue Commission North Hampton, NH 03862 East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Judge Gustave A. Linenberger Diane Curran, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Andrea C. Ferster, Esquire Board Panel Harmon & Weiss U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Suite 430 Commission 2001 S Street, N.W.
I East West Towers Building Washington, DC 20009 -
4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Dr. Jerry Harbour Stephen E. Merrill Atomic Safety and Licensing Attorney General Board Panel George Dana Bisbee U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Assistant Attorney General Commission Office of the Attorney General East West Towers Building 25 Capitol Street 4350 East West Highway Concord, NH 03301-6397 Bethesda, MD 20814
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Sherwin E. Turk, Esquire Board Panel Office of the Executive Legal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Director Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Tenth Floor -
7735 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda, MD 20814
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Robert A. Backus, Esquire Appeal Board Panel 116 Lowell Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory P.O. Box 516 Commission Manchester, NH 03105 Washington, DC 20555 1
Philip Ahrens, Esquire Mr. J. P. Nadeau
. Assistant Attorney General Selectmen's office Department of the Attorney 10 Central Road General Rye, NH 03870 Augusta, ME 04333 Paul McEachern, Esquire Carol S. Sneider, Esquire Matthew T. Brock, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Shaines & McEachern Department of the Attorney General 25 Maplewood Avenue One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor P.O. Box 360 Boston, MA 02108 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Mrs. Sandra Gavutis Mr. Calvin A. Canney Chairman, Board of Selectmen City Manager RFD 1 - Box 1154 City Hall Route 107 126 Daniel Street Kensington, NH 03827 Portsmouth, NH 03801
- Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Mr. Angie Machiros U.S. Senate Chairman of the Washington, DC 20510 Board of Selectmen (Attn: Tom Burack) Town of Newbury Newbury, MA 01950
- Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Mr. Peter J. Matthews One Eagle Square, Suite 507 Mayor Concord, NH 03301 City Hall (Attn: Herb Boynton) Newburyport, MA 01950 Mr. Thomas F. Powers, III Mr. William S. Lord Town Manager Board of Selectmen Town of Exeter Town Hall - Friend Street 10 Front Street Amesbury, MA 01913 Exeter, NH 03833 H. Joseph Flynn, Esquire Brentwood Board of Selectmen Office of General Counsel RFD Dalton Road Federal Emergency Management Brentwood, NH 03833 Agency 500 C Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20472 Gary W. Holmes, Esquire Richard A. Hampe, Esquire Holmes & Ells Hampe and McNicholas 47 Winnacunnet Road 35 Pleasant Street Hampton, NH 03841 Concord, NH 03301
Mr. Ed Thomas Judith H. Mizner, Esquire FEMA, Region I Silverglate, Gertner, Baker, 442 John W. McCormack Post Fine, Good & Mizner Office and Court House 88 Broad Street Post Office Square Boston, MA 02110 Boston, MA 02109 Charles P. Graham, Esquire McKay, Murphy and Graham 100 Main Street Amesbury, MA 01913 a .f & a,., &
George H. Lewald
(*= Ordinary U.S. First Class Mail.)