ML20236D500

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Staff Further Supplemental Response to Town of Hampton First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to NRC Staff on 880628-29 Exercise (Exercise).* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20236D500
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1989
From: Chan E
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:
HAMPTON, NH
References
CON-#189-8321 OL, NUDOCS 8903230131
Download: ML20236D500 (14)


Text

. - - - . - . _ _ _ ..

  • j 3/16/89 '

EEWED CORRESPOffD@JC

-. L ft UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION *gg tiAR 20 P4 :05 BEFORETHEATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSINGBOARD(

In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-443 OL PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF 50-444 OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. Off-site Emergency Planning (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) .

NRC STAFF'S FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO TOWN OF HAMPTON'S FIRST SET OF INTERR0GATORIES AND REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO THE NRC STAFF ON THE JUNE 28-29, EXERCISE (" EXERCISE")

On March 10, 1989, the NRC Staff supplemented its January 27, 1989 response to the " Town of Hampton's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for the Production of Documents to the NRC Staff on the June 28-29, 1985 Exercise (" Exercise"), filed on December 23, 1988. The enclosed document was inadvertently omitted from that filing althcugh it was part of the Staff Response to Massachusetts Attorney General's Informal Discovery Request on MAG-Ex-19, dated March 9, 1989.

Respectfully submitted, Elaine I. Chan Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 16th day of March, 1989  :

8903230131 890316 PDR ADOCK 05000443 0 PDR

DOCKEiED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA r NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPWISSION .

'89 11AR 20 P4 :05 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

(

l.' In the Matter of ) y" ..

Docket Nos.' 50-443 OL~

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF 50-444 OL NEWHAMPSHIRE,et,al. Off-site Emergency Planning Issues (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "NRC STAFF'S FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO TOWN OF HAMPTON'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO THE NRC STAFF ON THE JUNE 28-29, 1988 EXERCISE (" EXERCISE")"

in..the above captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class or, as indicated by an asterisk, by deposit .in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal mail system, this 16th day of March 1989:

Ivan W. Smith, Chairman (2)* Philip Ahrens, Esq.

Administrative Judge Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Office of the Attorney General U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State House Station Washington, DC 20555 Augusta ME 04333 Richard F. Cole

  • John Traficonte, Esq.

Administrative Judge Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Office of the Attorney General U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consnission One Ashburton P16ce,19th Floor Washington, DC 20555 Boston, MA 02108 Kenneth A. McCollom* Geoffrey Huntington, Esq.  !

Administrative Judge Assistant Attorney General 1107 West Knapp Street Office of the Attorney General Stillwater, OK 74075 25 Capitol Street Concord, NH 03301 James H. Carpenter, Alternate

  • Administrative Judge Diane Curran, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Harmon, Curran & Tousley U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2001 S Street, NW Washington, DC 20555 Suite 430 Washington, DC 20009 Thomas G. Dignan, Jr., Esq.

Robert K. Gad, III Esq. Robert A. Backus Esq.

Ropes & Gray Backus, Meyer & Solomon One International Place 116 Lowell Street Boston, MA 02110-2624 Manchester, NH 03106 l

d

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ ._-________ ______ ____________ ___ _ _ _ ____ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _-

H. J. Flynn, Esq. Judith H. Mizner, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel 79 State Street Federal Emergency Management Agency Newburyport, MA 01950 i 500 C Street, S.W.

Washington, DC 20472 Robert Carrigg, Chairman Board of Selectmen Paul McEachern, Esq. Town Office Shaines & McEachern Atlantic Avenue 25 Maplewood Avenue North Hampton, NH 03862 P.O. Box 360 Portsmouth, NH 03801 William S. Lord Board of Selectmen Charles P. Graham, Esq. Town Hall - Friend Street McKay, Murphy & Graham Amesbury, MA 01913 100 Main Street Amesbury,'MA 01913 Mrs. Anne E. Goodman, Chairman Board of Selectmen Sandra Gavutis, Chairman 13-15 Newmarket Road Board of Selectmen Durham, NH 03824 RFD #1, Box 1154 Kensington, NH 03827 Kensington, NH 03827 Hon. Gordon J. Humphrey Calvin A. Canney United States Senate City Hall 531 Hart Senate Office Building 126 Daniel Street Washington, DC 20510 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Richard R. Donovan R. Scott Hill-Whilton, Esq. Federal Emergency Management Lagoulis, Clark, Hill-Whilton Agency

& McGuire Federal Regional Center 79 State Street 130 228th Street, S.W.

Newburyport, MA 01950 Bothell, Washington 98021-9796 Allen Lampert Peter J. Matthews, Mayor Civil Defense Director City Hall 1 Town of Brentwood Newburyport, MA 01950 l 20 Franklin ,

Exeter, NH 03833 Michael Santosuosso, Chairman Board of Selectmen William Armstrong South Hampton, NH 03827 Civil Defense Director Town of Exeter Ashod N. Amirian, Esq.

10 Front Street Town Counsel for Merrimac  ;

Exeter, NH 03833 145 South Main Street P.O. Box 38 Gary W. Holmes, Esq. Bradford, MA 01835 Holmes & Ellis 47 Winnacunnet Road Barbara J. Saint Andre, Esq.

Hampton, NH 03842 Kopelman and Paige, P.C. .

77 Franklin Street ]

Boston, MA 02110 '

F

'Ms. Suzanne Breiseth J. P. Nadeau Board of Selectmen. Board of Selectmen Town of Hampton Falls 10 Central Street Drinkwater Road Rye, NH 03870 Hampton Falls, NH 03844 1 Atomic Safety and Licensing-  !

Robert R. Pierce, Esq.* Board Panel (1)*

Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Panel Washington, DC 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,

Washington, DC 20555 Ms. Elizabeth Weinhold 3 Godfrey Avenue Atomic Safety and Licensing Hampton, NH 03842 Appeal Panel (5) i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washington,' DC 20555 1

Docketing and Service Section*

Office of the Secretary '

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ,

u' Elaine I. Chan Counsel for NRC Staff 1

1 i

l I

g- .

^

OBattelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories I

{ P.O. Box 999 Richland, Washington U.S.A. 99352 Telephone (509) 375-3782 Teles 15 2874 ,

l t

July 18, 1988 Mr. E. F. Fox, Jr. .

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Rd. i King of Prussia, PA 19406

Dear Ed:

SEABROOK EXERCISE, JUNE 28, 1988 EnclosedismyfinalreportasthePacificNorthwestLaboratory(PNL) l partici ant during the subject exercise. Only minor changes have been made to the raft given to you prior to my leaving the site. The area covered was the Technical Support Center.

1 If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me on FTS (509) 375-3782.

Sincerely, ,

1 J. . Jam son, Project Manager Operational Health Physics Occupational & Environmental Protection Section HEALTH PHYSICS DEPARTMENT JDJ/ chb Enclosure cc: WD Travers, w/ enclosure LC Ruth, w/ enclosure 18 *

(

o } '.* ' s

  • E*'..

l l

i SEABROOK EMERGENCY PREPARE 0 NESS EXERCISE l June 28, 1988 A. Name: J. D. Jamison l

B. Assionment: Technical Support Center (TSC)

C. Site Personnel Contacted: J. Rafalowski, TSC HP Coordinator (Red Team);

R. Starrett, TSC HP Coordinator (White Team); A. Merrill, TSC Controller; R. Littman, TSC Controller; D. Moody, Site Emergency Director (SED) (Red Team); W. DiProfio, Site Emergency Director (White Team); G. Kleine, Technical Support Coordinator (Red Team); J. Linville, Chemistry Coordinator (Red Team); and J. Distefano, YNSD Radiological Engineer (RedTeam). ,

D. Positive Findinos e The TSC was manned quickly and efficiently. The SED carefully established plant conditions through discussion with the control room I (CR) staff before declaring the TSC activated and assuming the role of SED.

. The availability of and access to controlled drawings and technical manuals was excellent, e The display of current and past (trended) plant data on status boards ",

was excellent. Key data were promptly displayed in an easy-to-read manner. (However,theradiologicalsurveymapswerenotusedatall.)

e The engineering group actively pursued alternative lineups for .-

f restoration of containment spray throughout the exercise. (However,the l -

quality and workability of some of the proposed lineups was questionable,andnonewasevercarriedthroughtoexecution.)

., e 0 h

1 i y 2 --

. The turnover to the oncoming white team was orderly and complete,

( although quite noisy.

)

. The extended dose authorizations were processed in a careful and considered manner for workers to be involved in the completion of the CBS pump repair.

. The YNSD Radiological engineer correctly pursued critical organ dose calculations for the particulate constituents of the release in order to confirm the adequacy of the protective action recommendations based only on calculated whole body and thyroid doses.

E. Negative Findinas

. Discussion of the emergency action levels in force seemed to indicate a 1

basic misconception of the classification / deescalation process on the {

-I part of many TSC staff. (This was later clarified by the white team SED.)

. The noise level in the TSC was frequently excessive due to many separate discussions going on simultaneously with little discipline or control. .

. With the RCS depressurized and a major release still in progress, the j chemistry coordinator requested (and received) permission to take an RCS 1 sample because technical specifications require a sample every four l hours if dose equivalent iodine-131 is greater than 1 pCi/gm or gross N

coolant activity is greater than 100/E Ci/gm.)  ?

%. d '

. Radiological controls in the TSC during the period of the large release l were at times ineffective. ,

\

A frisk station was set up inside the main control room door, however a second access door to the control room complex was uncontrbiled.

.x,'- .* .". z *

( g i..;g i. ,

,. G

- No self-reading dosimeters were issued to the red team members, I even though they were allowed to leave the TSC and depart the site j with a large release in progress while the wind was shifting.  !

- The Health Physics Coordinator removed one air sample head and handled the filter cartridge with bare hands, even though some activity had reportedly entered the CR/TSC ventilation envelope.

. No significant effort was directed at locating and sealing the containment leak.

. There was no objective evaluation or discussion of the impossibility of such a huge release following the relatively minor core mechanical damage and thermal transient. (Total release exceeded Chernobyl).

. Effort to find parts to repair the turbine driven EFW pump continued until nearly 1900, even though the EFW system operability ceased to be a consideration in the accident at 1330 when the large break LOCA occurred.

F. Chronology Time Observation 0840 Arrived in TSC. Three controllers present. No evidence of prestaging. -

l 0902 PA announcement- " Evacuate the primary auxiliary building."

0907 PA announcement--Alert declared.

0912 First staff begin arriving in TSC. -

'0925 TSC not activated yet, coordinator briefs team on status.

0928 HP Coordinator has HP 41C set up for dose calculations.

0933 SED in TSC, gives briefing on plant status.

~

0935 Don Ho'ody ready to assume as SED. ,,

. ;.h. .

3 ..

____._m___--_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

Time Observation f 0946 Moody declares TSC operational, assumes role of SED.

1002 Maintenance staff reviewing drawings to determine importance of the AFW pipe support work.

1004 SED directs HP Coordinator to look at potential PARS if a leak develops. HP Coordinator goes to FSAR for accident source term.

information.

1010 EOF declared operational.

1020 HP Coordinator and Radiological Engineer locate the analysis for small line break outside containment and scale up the results for the difference in coolant activity.

1047 SED conducts briefing on plant status. HP Coordinator developing PARS for small line break with current RCS activity. Good

,, consideration of potential for AFW line break if AFW initiated with pipe support missing. TSC recommends valving off the affected line until repair complete. ,

1100 HP Coordinator reviews dose projection and PAR with SED.

1119 Habitability check with R0-2, ch'eck of SRDs.

1127 Based on RCS activity, 0.007% of I&NG are in the coolant. '

1130 s,, Trip valve for steam driver EFW pump just went shut. Pipe support team directed to investigate.

1136 Report on EFW system damage.

1146 Escalating to SAE based on damage to EFW system, EAL 18C, 2.

1149 Engineers recommend running motor-driven EFW pump to verify operability. l 1149 PA announcement, Alarm for SAE. '

. .x

(

"?::.

4  ? 'i'"

i

L.. .

l

.i l

Time Observation j

! 1156' Report on EFW damage, briefing by SED.

1215 Discussing alternate cooldown modes, cross connect from diesel fire pump to EFW.

1224 Status update: beaches have been closed. Fire hoses rated at 600 psi have been found for possible cross-connects. Power still trending down, even though controller supposedly stopped the power reduction (Xenon buildup is doing it).

1245 Good status board configuration--good attention to maintenance of boards.

1247 Letdown monitor jumped to 865 pCi/cc.

1309 Results of 1220 RCS sample: Gross activity = 720 pCi/cc; DEI-131

= 70.8 pCi/cc.

1315 Letdown monitor up to 1000 pCi/cc.

1328 Reactor trip, safety injection. Containment high range rad =

2.7E+4R/hr.

1332 General Emergency on " post LOCA reactor trip" (8.d) pressure in containment = 47 psi. Containment spray pump B fails to start.

1340 Good analysis and recommendations regarding the containment spray '

s. pump.

o 1344 Projected site boundary dose rates (based on CHRRMS and design leak rate) is ~1.5 mr/hr.

1345 WRGMS alarm, reading 4.13E+8 pCi/cc.

1348 Chemistry Director suggests sending the team now preparing for containment gas sample to get a WRGMS sample instead - good thinking.

5 .}.5-  :- - .

l. .

1 Time Observation

( 1350 Engineering has devised a flow path from RHR to CBS. However, it won't work because of location of RHR suction from the RWST. Now working on another path using HPSI pumps.

1404 WRGMS now greater than 109 pCi/sec. 1409 METPAC projection for 1345 release rate is 208 mr/hr WB and 216 mr/hr infant thyroid at 0.6 mi.

1428 Status briefing by SED. Now in cold leg ' recirculation.

1430 Relief crew is being held at EOF pending survey of site access road. Survey requested from OSC.

1442 Technical Support Coordinator directs survey team be expedited out of OSC to survey site access road.

1447 Briefing by ESD on team relief procedure.

1457 Survey of access road complete. Results of 1423 WRGMS sample received. Projection is ~4 R/hr at 2 miles. Lots of particulate and iodine in the release, characterized as " messy" (also very bio i

-- ~30 million Ci) nobody comments on it! Amazing.

1516 Ready to start CBS "B" pump. No success.

1517 Swap breakers on CBS "A" and "B". ~

1522 s,, Relief crew bus is on its way in.

1524 No dosimeters have been issued to TSC staff; HP Coordinator made first habitability survey since 1355, just after release began.

1536 Relief crew coming in.

1538 Relief begins - lots of noise. Most oncoming staff don't have SRDs. Plant survey maps that are posted as status boards were e

  • .'*g te - '4
  • 6 '**] ! "

i

_______.____ ___________m__... _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Time Observation

( never marked with dose rates etc., as reported by OSC teams or ARM readings.

1602 NRC resident (evaluator) raises concern over quality of licensee's evaluation of the engineering support team and their ideas for

" fixes".

1614 Relief complete - red team directed to assemble outside TSC and take TLDs and dosimeters to EOF. Most, if not all, red team members don't have dosimeters.

1633 Briefing by SED. Simulator and OSC have completed relief.

1638 CBSpump9Brepairedandoperating(controlleraction). Simulator asks permission to start it. Some confusion. Work on the alternate lineup is stopped.

1646 Habitability survey by HP Coordinator. Now processing dose extensions for team to go in and finish repair to CBS pump 9A.

1708 SED briefs TSC team. Containment level still dropping slowly, don't know where its going. Review of PARS now in effect, changes in wind direction likely.

1715 CBS pump 9A repaired and operating (controller action). -

1719 Controller says containment sump not really dropping. Simulator artifact.

1726 SED briefing -- cooling down containment with CBS, WRGMS readings coming down. SED says "have deescalated" on the 8d (containment radiation) EAL to 8c (Site Area Emergency) however, still in GE because calculated dose rate at site boundary is 100 mr/hr.

[ ,

, ..$.?;.

1 7 4' .T. i ~

_ _ _ _ _ __. ______________________ ____-____- _~

E.

l Time Observation 1730 Chemistry Coordinator wants to take RCS sample because technical l

. specifications say take one every 4 hrs when DEI-131 >1 pCi/gm or gross activity >199/E pCi/gm. Do these requirements really apply to post accident conditions?

1740 Discussion between SED and Emergency Operations Manager on reasons for blowing down the steam generators (to reduce containment heat load). .

~

[ 1753 Radiological Engineer trying to ' determine if the particulate in

! the effluent are a significant contributor to offsite dose. Could 9

j bet Doesn't their program include these nuclides? METPAC does.

I 1755 SED briefing.

1802 Increase in CR air particulate and dose rates at guard station.

Very noisy! '

1825 Briefing by SED.

1834 Briefing by SED, containment pressure coming down slowly, more

)

slowly than it should. YNSD is asked to work on the question..

f Still talking about declassifying when site boundary dose rate  !

l '

comes down.

1842 5,,HP Coordinator changes out air sampler cartridge with bare hands.

1848 EOF calculates SB dose rate ~560 mr/hr.

1850 Forecast is for rain -- Chemistry Coordinator wants to send a team out to " raise the weir" to keep any deposited activity from being flushed into the river. HP Coordinator questions the order to sendamantothewarehouse#3(whichisdirectlyinlinewiththe plume)~ to get the parts for the turbine driven EFW pump. SED sa'ys ,

~

)

8

' j, '

i

_ _m. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _

f Time Observation (correctly) that the EFW pump isn't that important now. (No g capabilitytocirculatecoolant.)

9

[ 1900 Exercise is suspended.

i e

h l

v

. e e

e 6

e asp e *

) s. ' .5"$'. *;*

, +:;. ; .

1

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -