IR 05000508/1986008

Insp Rept 50-508/86-08 on 860715-18.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Readiness Review Program,Const Assurance Program & Site Tour

ML20206N463
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	07/31/1986
From:	Ang W, Jim Melfi, Mendonca M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206N461	List: IR 05000508/1986008 ML20206N456
References
50-508-86-08, 50-508-86-8, IEC-81-08, IEC-81-8, IEIN-85-056, IEIN-85-56, NUDOCS 8608260295
Download: ML20206N463 (5)

Text

_ .. . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - .. _ _ -

. ,

+

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

b

,

Report No. 50-508/86-08

'

Docket No. 50-508

,

,

Construction Permit No. CPPR-154

,

Licensee: Washington Public Power Supply-System (WPPSS)

P. O. Box 1223 Elma, Washington 98541

,

. Facility Name: . Washington 'Nuclea'r Project 3

_

Inspection Conducted: July 15-18, 1986  ;

$ Inspectors: [U i 7-3/-86 '

W. P. 'Ang, Project Inspector -Date Signed-

' vo ~1 ~36 -t%

J. Melfi, Reactor Inspector Date Signed

Approved by: * # ~

-

7-38- E M. M. Mendonca, Chief Date Signed Summary:

.

Inspe'etion on' July 15-18, 1986 (Report No. 50-508/86-08). '

!

Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced. inspection by a regionally based ( inspector of the readiness. review program,' construction assurance program, and

[ site-tour. Inspection procedures .30703, 45051, and 45055 were used for

{ guidanc '

.

Results: Of the areas inspected, no violations' or' deviations. were ider.tified.

C

{ >

J -

,

.

,

t r

). -

r j -

F

.

.

h8260295860807

G ADOCK 05000508

PDR

.

!-

i

, --., , .,. - ,, - , .- ,, , -.- ,- - - . . ..- ,, . . - . , ,.. ., ,. ,.., . - - . - _ - - . . - . . - -

p

- -

, '

.

?

DETAILS Persons Contacted

- Washington Public Power Supply System P. D. Olson, Program Director L. J. Garvin, Readiness Review Program Manager

• C. E. Love, Deputy Program Director

• D. R. Coody, Project QA Manager

• R. L. Knawa, Construction Assurance Program Manager G. A. Block, Engineering Assurance Program Manager

• E..A. Stauffer, Plant QA/QC Manager

• P. W. Coleman, Licensing Manager Ebasco Services In *R. M. Taylor, Project General Manager -

• P. L. Pitman, Quality Program Site Manager (Acting)

'

• Attended exit interview at WNP- . Independent Inspection Effort The inspectors conducted a general inspection of portions of the exterior and interior area of the reactor building and of the auxiliary building to observe plant preservation, housekeeping, and storag No violations or deviations were identifie . Readiness Review - Construction Assurance Program (CAP) Module 1 -

Earthwork Oversight Committee i During the inspection, the Readiness Review Oversight Committee was l

on site interviewing CAP Module 1 reviewers and the CAP manage The Oversight Committee also discussed the review plan for CAP Module 1, the reviews performed, and the review results. The NRC i

inspectors met briefly with the Oversight Committee to discuss the Committee's activities to date. The individual members of the i Committee did not express any major concerns. The committee was i scheduled to review CAP Module 1 activities at the Richland, l Washington Supply System Office and subsequently hold an Oversight Committee meeting to discuss and comment on CAP Module 1.

,

No violations or deviations were identified.

l l Licensee Earthwork Procedures i

The licensee's commitments regarding earthwork are in Section 2. of the WNP-3 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). The licensee's l

commitments regarding foundations are in FSAR Section 3. The I

l l

l

-

___

J

'

-o 2 licensee's commitments regarding Quality Assurance (QA) are in FSAR Chapter 17. The following WNP-3 Specifications and Procedures were reviewed for compliance with FSAR Commitments:

EBASCO Specification WPPSS 324-466, Revision 2, Soil Cement and Structural Backfil *

Morrison-Knudsen Company Procedure ^CP-17, Revision 5, Procedure for Placing, Compacting, Curing and Inspection of Soil Cement and Class Al Structural Fil *

Pittsburgh Testing _ Laboratory Procedure ~QC-ST-1, Revision 3, Soils Inspection and Tests Fiel *

Guy F. Atkinson Procedure GFACO QCP-9, Revision 6, Concrete Preplacement. Inspectio In addition, the NRC" inspectors reviewed the licensee's " Review Plan forEarthwork/SoilsC,oppaction."'

No violations or deviations were identifie CAP Module 1 Reviews An inspection of the licensee's readiness reviews regarding ,

earthwork / soil compaction was performed. The following licensee CAP review checklists were sampled and inspected:

CAP-D-C-01-01 - Soil cement - In-place Density / Moisture Tes *

CAP-D-C-01-03 - Soil cement - cement content

~ *

CAP-D-C-01-06 - Soil cement - density test frequency

'

CAP-D-C-01-07 - Soil cement / soils - curing and lift thickness

CAP-D-C-01-12 - QA Audits

CAP-D-C-01-14 - Proctor tests / sieve analysis - Class Al fill

• *

CAP-D-C-01-15 - Class Al fill - In-Place Density Test

CAP-D-C-01-16 - Site EBASCO QC Surveillance

CAP-D-C-01-21 - EBASCO QC Inspector's Qualifications The NRC inspectors noted that the checklists were still being reviewed and approved by the CAP Manager. The inspectors noted various discrepancies / questions regarding the completed construction work and records. However, the inspectors also noted that all the discrepancies / questions that the inspectors identified had been similarly identified by the Readiness Review team and listed on their open items list. The CAP review teams open items list was reviewed by the inspectors. The list consisted of 45 open items

- ,_ _ _ . - _ __ _ _,

r-

, , i< >

e . ,

identified during the reviews. TThe discrepancies identified by the review team were in the process of being reviewed and evaluated for disposition and/or corrective action by the Supply System

-

Construction Project and the EBASCO on-site organizatio No violations or deviations were identifie (Closed) Inspection and Enforcement Circular (IEC) 81-08 -

Foundation Materials Licensee's activities for IEC 81-08 had been inspected and closed in inspection report 50-508/83-02. The IEC provided information regarding earthwork problems at various nuclear facilities and recommended action to be taken by licensees that was relevant to the CAP review subject - earthverh. A reinspection was performed to determine the CAP review activities performed for IEC 81-08. The CAP team had reviewed IEC 81-08, and was in the process of documenting the review. No specific open item had been identified on the open items list in relation to-IEC 81-0 The inspectors reviewed licensee's records for IEC 81-0 Project Site Procedure EM-3-T5, Revision 1, provides requirements for processing of NRC Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins, Circulars and Information Notices. IEC 81-08 licensee's records indicate that the notice had been evaluated and nonconforming conditions were identified on Non-Conformance Reports 14468, 14469, 14615, and 14660, regarding qualfty of fill material used around buried safety-related piping. The records also indicated that a similar problem existed with the specifications for buried electrical duct work that had not been completed. Specifications had been changed; and corrective actions to be accomplished upon resumption of construction had been identified and was being controlled by the NCR proces No violations or deviations were identifie , (0 pen) IE Notice 85-56 - Inadequate Environment Corner for Components and Systems in Extended Storage or Lay-Up The IEN was opened in February of 1986 by RV inspection report 50-508/86-02. The IEN and the inspection report identified a need for the licensee to review its preservation program and. determine the need for internal visual inspection of tanks, heat exchangers, et Licensee actions in response to the IEN was discussed with Project Management during the inspection. The licensee stated that items requiring internal visual inspection had been reviewed and identifie A change to the preservation program inspection. procedure had been prepared but had not been issued. . Inspections had not yet been performed. The licensee stated that internal visual inspections should be completed by November 1986. This IE Notice was left ope No violations or deviations were identified, s

)

, c- , -,,n-- - - - - , , - - - .---, - , , - - ,.

r-' .

t  %,

'

'

A (

, <

,,

,

,

4 -

's ,.

- '

,

• *

. ,

.5.- Exit Interview .

'

'

The -. inspection, scope and fitidings'were sumarizek on ~ July 18, 1986, with those persons-indicated in paragraph 1. The. inspector described at WNP-3 the areas inspected and discussed <in detail .the ; inspection findings. 'No dissenting coments .were received ifrom the licensee. The licensee did -

not identify,as proprietary any of-the material which was.provided to, or

. reviewed by-the inspector during this. inspectio ,

,

+

+

b a

"

~ - . . . . _ , - . . . - - ~