IR 05000508/1985008

Meeting Rept 50-508/85-08 on 851029.Major Areas Discussed: Util Proposed Readiness Review Programs for Const Assurance. Viewgraphs Encl

ML20137C607
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	11/05/1985
From:	Ang W, Dodds R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137C594	List: IR 05000508/1985008 ML20137C592
References
50-508-85-08, 50-508-85-8, NUDOCS 8511260546
Download: ML20137C607 (30)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. -. _ . .. - .

> !. l -' ' . I -

'a . j _,, e - U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, . = REGION V- ,~ [ ' I ' ' . , ~ Report No.

50-508/85-08' , l - ' Docket No.

50-508 , , . ' ' Construction Permit No.

CPPR-154 , l Licensee: WashingtonPublicPower!SuplhSstem il 3000-George Washington Way , Richland,' Washington 99352 Fa'cility Name: Washington' Nuclear Proect 3 j Meeting at: Satsop I'nformation Center, Elma, Washington > Datel October 29, 1985 , s Prepared by: 'W t i-t - 99 - W. P. Ang, Project Inspector Date Signed Reactor Projects Section 1 I Approved By: - //hI ' - R. T. Do'dds, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1 Date/ Signed Summary: Meeting on Octob'er 29, 1985, to examine,the Supply System's proposed readiness review programs for construction assurance.

. ) L

8 b - n ! -~ r . ir ' .%. 8511260546 851106 PDR ADOCK 05000508 O PDR " .. . _ _ ... . . . ... .. . - - - - - _ _ _ - =. . ..

. , ' , DETAILS , 1.

Personnel Attending Meeting RV-NRC D. F. Kirsch, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects R. T. Dodds, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1 W. P. - Ang, Project Inspector, Reactor Projects Section 1 ' f IE-NRC R. F. Heishman, Chief, Reactor Construction Programs Branch W. M. Hill, Senior Engineer, Quality Assurance Branch E. V. Imbro, Engineering Assurance Review Coordinator, Quality Assurance Branch WPPSS A. D. Kohler, Director of Projects R. B. Glasscock, Director of Licensing and Assurance R. N. Williams, Deputy Program Director, WNP-3 L. J. Garvin, Manager, Readiness Review Program G. C. Sorensen, Manager, Regulatory Programs G. A. Block, Engineering Assurance Manager.

R. L. Knawa, Construction Assurance Manager Staff EBASCO J.-Crnich, Project General Manager Staff ' Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) . ' W. Fitch, Executive Secretary C. Lakewood, Member N. Johanson, State Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Attendees ! J. Adams, Investor Owned Utility Representative K. James, Reporter, Chronicle S. Whitingtton, Editor, Clearing Up

S. Bruce, Assoc. Editor, Clearing Up R. Wodnik, Reporter, Daily World . e, =w.- ,we,---, .,-a.

, - ~, - -. ---, ---,,, -.,.-----mw--- .w,--- - - -, ->--,. y - r- ,

o = .^ .

' ,

• -

> . 2... Ge$eral ' .. ^ . . ' ,, ' , .i* '- ;,, .The Supply System has previously met with NRC. representatives to discuss ithe, proposed, readiness review programs for WNP-1 and WNP-3.

In'the Supply-. Systems" letter;of May-22, 1985, a specific request was made that ~ the NRC' agree,to review the program description of Readiness Reviews at WNP-3 and WNP-1 for(approval, agree to participate in the Readiness Rhview at WNP 3 ;and WNP-1 and ' review the Preservation Program Description .

~ , , .for-approval., ' j s' . 14.

's .. . , dated May 24, 1985, the Supply System sent a copy of ', ,In letter;G03-85-283 , _ r t the preservation: program entitled " Preservation of Assets Preventative Maintenance Progra'",for NRC' review and approval. The description of the m programmatic controls for.the Preservation Program were subsequently.

furnished with G03-85-358 dated June 28, 1985, which was also submitted ~ for:NRC' review'and approval. The Preservation Program description was . approved by NRC Report No. 50-508/85-05, dated September 18, 1985.

In letter G01-85-0127/G03-85-0299 dated J'une 3, 1985, the Supply System requested' review and. approval of the Design Review Program entitled " Engineering Assurance ' Program (EAP)". The Design Review Program description.was approved by NRC Report No. 50-508/85-06, dated-October 25, 1985.

In letter C03-85-563 dated September 25, 1985, the Supply System requested review and approval of the Construction Assurance Program.

. The purpose of the meeting on October 29, 1985, was to review the status of the WNP-3 project and the-aforementioned submittal pertaining to the Construction Assurance Program. Attached are copies of the slides used by the licensee during the presentation of the proposed program for NRC consideration.

The licensee responded as follows for specific issues / questions: i

'The Oversight Committee proposed in Supply System. letter G03-85-467-will be utilized for both the Engineering Assurance Program and the Construction Assurance Program. Functions and resources will be , more clearly defined.

' "' Construction Assurance Program (CAP) procedures are being prepared (see enclosure) to define. organizational, administrative and process control requirements.

• 13 CAP review topics have been identified (see enclosure).
• NRC reporting requirements specified by 10 CFR 50.55(e) and Part 21 will be complied with separately.
• Correlation of EAP findings and CAP findings will be considered.

The only comment from the public was from a member of EFSEC who stated that the Council supported the Readiness Review and Preservation i Programs.

'l i

a

e-y.- .. _. - -. _ - -.,.a-,

e , . O . WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM OVERVIEW . l i , ' $ 10/29/85 , i .- -. . ... . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ __ -

-.... - .. .. -. - - _ _ - -. ... -. _ _. -. j i - i - . + . . O

. READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM .

WHAT IS IT: e A SERIES OF REVIEWS TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF AN ACTIVITY.

' e FOR THE SUPPLY SYSTEM THE SERIES OF REVIEWS ' ' ( ENCOMPASS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND PREPARAT10M FOR OPERATIONS.

i ! e THE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM CIVES THE SUPPLY SYSTEM ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE OF THE QUALITY OF THE COMPLETED WORK.

< ' , e THE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM ALSO HAS NRC PARTICIPATION.

i e i ! . I 10/29/85 -- --..-. - -_ _- . - . -....--. --.--..-- - -. - --.- _

.- .-. ... -- .. - - . - .. ... . -.. . - . -. _.. . ' . I _

O

. I ! ' INITIAL PHASE .

, f

e REVIEW OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.

' e FOCUS ON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES.

! i e SAMPLE PRODUCTS OF THESE PROCESSES AND DRAW CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEWS.

i

i s ' !

! ! I.

10/29/85 ,

,._ -. - ,. _... _ _ ~ _. _ _... _, _. _ _ _ _., _ _ _ _ - _. _.. _. _,. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _.. _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,. _ _ _ - -

. ... e -

O . , . SECOND PHASE i COMPLETE THE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAMS . e REVIEWS WILL INCLUDE CONTROL SYSTEMS PUT IN PLACE BY CONTRACTORS AT THE RESTARTED PROJECTS.

e REVIEWS WILL INCLUDE ALL OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS AND PUNCH-LISTED ITEMS FROM THE INITIAL PHASE.

. 'N e REVIEWS WILL BE CONDUCTED TO INCREMENTALLY ACCEPT THE PROJECT WORK AS IT PROGRESSES TOWARD LICENSING AND

FUEL LOAD.

f e DETAILS OF THE SECOND PHASE WILL BE DISCUSSED BEFORE RESTART OF CONSTRUCTION.

.e QQAL-COMPLETION OF THE SERIES OF REVIEWS WILL RESULT IN AN SER WITH NO OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS.

O 10/29/85 -. - __ -. - -. .

. _. _. -... .. _. _ _ _ _ - _. _ _ - _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.. _ .. _.. . . . . . i .

i

) ' < ., . , i i i '

a , ELEMENTS OF READINESS REVIEW

i

e PRESERVATION PROGRAM

< ' , e ENGINEERING ASSURANCE , , i e CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE ! ! . I ! , i ) i I l l

' I ! l i l

l 10/29/85 . - .. -, -.... - -. - - - -.. -. - -. - - - - -. - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .

. _ _ _ _ _ _.. _.

_.

_ .. _.. . - . . O PRESERVATION i e ON-GOING FULLY IMPLEMENTED PROGRAM.

. . e G0AL TO PRESERVE THE SUPPLY SYSTEM ASSETS IN AN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.

e PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL IN TWO PARTS.

t O 'e CONTROL DOCUMENT " SUPPLY SYSTEM WNP-3 ' PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION PROGRAM" - JUNE 28, 1985.

. e BASIC REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT WMC-051 " PRESERVATION OF ASSETS - PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM" - MAY 24, 1985.

o QUESTIONS ANSWERED AUGUST 16, 1985.

e NRC APPROVAL OF PROGRAM DESCRIPTION RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 18.

1985.

1 10/29/85 !. __ .. .. - _ - - - -. - - - -. - - - - -

__.. . . .. - _ - -.. .. -_ - -- ... - . _.. . . . - . T _ J

.

i \\ , l ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ! ASSURANCE PROGRAMS } t e THESE PROGRAMS HAVE MANY SIMILAR FEATURES ! ! e CONFIRMATORY IN NATURE ' , , e INDEPENDENCE FROM PROJECT . b i ! , i I a i ! . i i !

. -. . .. -. . . - . . O MANAGING DIRECTOR DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR I I I DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR . ENGINEERING PROJECTS LICENSING & ASSURANCE WNP-3 PROGRAM PROGRAM MANAGER ' DIRECTOR READINESS REVIEW READINESS REVIEW GROUP REPORTS TO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.

INDEPENDENT OF THE PROJECT.

O . 10/29/85

.-- . _. . . . . . O READINESS REVIEW ORGANIZATION PROGRAM MANAGER L. J. GARVIN ,

i

O

' ' LICENSING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ASSURANCE MANAGER ASSURANCE MANAGER , i - G.C. SORENSEN G. A. BL0cK R. L. KNAWA , USING INDIVIDUALS MATRIXED FROM OTHER CORPORATE GROUPS.

lO 10/29/85 .. .. .. - . . - .

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . ._.

. . ..

~ O O O . - . '

WNP-3 READINESS REVIEW ! ORGAHlZATION-WPPSS !

MANAGING DIRECTOR i , I I DI R E CTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR l LICENSING B PROJECTS ENGINEERING ASSURANCE i l QA ! ! LICENSING] ! I I I I ' ' PROGRAM MANAGER l l WNP-3 WN P-2 WNP-l CENTRAL ! l b _.__.U fl READINESS. REVIEW l _ _ _ j [ OPERATIONS] lCONSTRUCTIOM [_l l I l l "^ ^ ' l lOUTSIDE SERVICESH d - ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE ASSURANCE l R$ l-- - + -MODULE I - MODULE I W------- ' l-- - + -lMODULE 2 l-l MODULE 2 l *- -(INSPECTORS) -d ' l I

MODULE M l d- - - - - - - - " - * dMODULE N ] - OUTSIDE SERVICES - U

,

-

1

- - - -. - _ _ - - - -. - -. . ' ,

. . O

, o PERFORMS REVIEWS UPON SAMPLES OF COMPLETED WORK (INCLUDING RECORDS).

e USE ONLY PEOPLE THAT WERE INDEPENDENT FROM THE ORIGINAL WORK,jlyl HAVE THE CAPABILITIES ! (QUALIFICATIONS) TO PERFORM THAT WORK.

O e REVIEWS CONDUCTED USING APPROVED PROCEDURES AND ' CHECKLISTS.

e DOCUMENT THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEWS INCLUDING ALL DEFICIENCIES DISCLOSED.

l , ! ' . 10/29/85 _ - -.. -. . . .. - - . __ _ __ . _ _ _.. . _ - _.

_. _ ... . - _ _ _ _ _.

. .

e DEFICIENCIES TO BE DISPOSITIONED AND TRACKED TO , CONCi.USION.

l e RESULTS OF THE REVIEWS WILL BE PRESENTED TO , READINESS REVIEW MANAGEMENT AND. SUPPLY SYSTEM ! SENIOR MANAGEMENT.

. e REPORTS DOCUMENTING THE REVIEWS AND CORRECTIVE

ACTIONS TO BE PRESENTED TO THE NRC FOR ACCEPTANCE.

i i f r h l 10/29/85 - - - .. - . - . -... - -. - .. ... .. . _ _ _ _ -.. - _ _, ... ._ . ' . O ENGINEERING ASSURANCE e GOAL TO GIVE ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE THAT THE DESIGN COMPLETED TO DATE IS ACCEPTABLE.

< e PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL JUNE 3, 1985.

I e QUESTIONS ANSWERED AUGUST 16, 1985.

! '; e SAMPLE DESIGN COMPLETED TO DATE.

e DRAWS CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULiC 0F THAT REVIEW AND FROM THE RESULTS OF ALL THE DESIGN REVIEWS.

t . t

O

, 10/29/85 , - . - - - . - -. .. . . -

.-.. - - -- - .. _ _. - . _ - - - - - _ _. -. -. _ - _ _-. _- [ . i - . . f - i- ! t i t i ~ CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE i e SAMPLES CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED TO DATE AND THE RECORDS OF THAT CONSTRUCTION.

i e DRAWS CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THESE REVIEWS.

, e ALSO. PERFORMS THE SUPPLY SYSTEM INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESERVATION PROGRAM.

i t e PROGRAM DESCRIPTION WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL ^ SEPTEMBER 25, 1985 - APPROVAL REQUESTED BEFORE JANUARY 1.

1986.

!

!O 10/29/85

__ - _.

_- ._ . ' . ' INTER-RELATIONSHIP OF THE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM , i PRESERVATION

L ASSESSMENT

L CONSTRUCTION e

SELF ASSESSMENT OF PRESERVATION ASSURANCE e WALKDOWNS AND DESIGN RELATED DEFICIENCIES FEED TO EAP.

L 1r FEEDBACK

L 1r

_ ENGINEERING e WALKDOWNS BY ENGINEERS FEED THE ASSURANCE CAP POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION RELATED PROBLEMS.

o 10/29/85

.- -_ _. - -- ... - - -. - __ _.

. . - _

.m.

. ...-...,xas--+-=.- - a s=~ a --- - m.- -wa-. a s.a.

g .=-.ns.-.--.a.>a.ws_ ~ - -

• b

4 O d l l WNP-3 CONSTRUCTION i READINESS REVIEW l WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM h NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 3

l l l l 0CTOBER 29, 1985 \\ , , t , ,, -. - - - -. - .. _. _ -, _ _,,. _. _ -.. - _,. _.. _ _ - _ - _ _. _ _ _. _.. _. - -. _,... _. -.. _.., _,. _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _... _. _ _. _. _. _ _., _ _ _ -.. - _... _ _ _ _ -

I ' . . . . . PURPOSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM ' o PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE OF THE ADEQUACY OF SAFETY-RELATED CONSTRUCTION WORK BY INDEPTH SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK.

o INCREASE CONFIDENCE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT BY PROVIDING A MECHANISM FOR EARLY RESOLUTION OF DIFFERENCES ' BETWEEN NRC AND THE SUPPLY SYSTEM IN INTERPRETATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENTS.

O INCREMENTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK BY THE NRC ON A SCHEDULED BASIS: - PHASE I: WORK COMPLETED PRIOR TO PRESERVATION, INCLUDING PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES.

- PHASE II: WORK COMPLETE AFTER RESTART OF CONSTRUCTION.

.

o , " ' ' T v r y -- - - - - s. e, - p

_ __ _ -. - __ . - CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM 5'" ^* ' CAP-6.1, 6.2 CAP-6.fi . o Team Leader DEVELOP PROGRAM 08TAIN NRC IMPLEMENT PROGRAM ' '" "" DEVELOP o Engineers o Descriptioe ACCEPTANCE o Procedures 4 MODULE OUTLINE Instructions n-o Reviewers "'" o ident Contractors o Budget o Presentations o Detailed Plans o Schedule o Discussions 4 Schedules o Ident Each Scope " o Public Meetings TRAIN TEAM o Estahl Se'Pa9nce o Prepare Schedule o Reviews

== o Te== Leader < men - o Team Member CAP-6.8 CAP-6.7 CAP-6.6, 6.7 CAP-6.6 CAP-6.4, 6.5 PREPARE INITIAL FEED 8ACK RECONCILE REVIEW RECORDS DEVELOP Monutt MODULE REPORT e Project HARDWARE 8 RECORDS o Compt Ehecklist REVIEW PLAN o Participants o Eng Assurance o Compare Results.

I n== o Adequacy

==* o Determine l Program Close Open items Requirements " o Preserv4 tion o Reglew Plans l o Adjust Cap Review o Findings o Historical Record o Checklists Resciution o Findings = o Prepare Sampling o Results o Analyze Results R4tinnale o Recosomendettons o identify Trends, o Prepare Checklists Safety Signific.

INSPECT HARDWARE o Select Semele of a Comp 1 Checklist Hdwre & Records mas o Adequacy num , o Ohtain Cao Mar Acoroval o Preservation o Findings CAP-6.8 CAP-6.9 ' RETAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT REVIEW OUTAIN NRC s o Dir Licensing (R) ' ACCEPTANCE o Assemble Records R0W DIAGRAM o WNP-3 Prog Dir (R) o overview o Transmit to Peru.

o Prog Mgr. RRP (A) o Sampilng o Dir Projects (A) e Reports

. . .. .- - _. . . .- . - . O TENTATIVE MODULE TOPICS / SUBJECTS MODULE NO.

SUBJECT APPROX. START C3-01 EARTHWORK / SOIL COMPACTION FEBRUARY, 1986 C3-02 CONCRETE, RE-STEEL & EMBEDMENTS MAY, 1986 C3-03 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AUGUST. 1986 C3-OLI STRUCTURAL STEEL ' NOVEMBER, 1986 C3-05 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION FEBRUARY, 1987 C3-06 PIPING AND VALVES MAY 1987 C3-07 PIPE SUPPORTS AUGUST. 1987 C3-08 ELECTRICAL RACEWAYS & SUPPORTS NOVEMBER, 1987 C3-09 CABLES & CABLE TERMINATIONS FEBRUARY. 1988 C3-10 HVAC DUCTWORK. SUPPORTS CONTROLS MAY, 1988 C3-li INSTRUMENTATION. TUBING & SUPPORTS AUGUST, 1988 , C3-12 CATHODIC PROTECTION & GROUNDING NOVEMBER, 1988 C3-13 MISC. (C0ATINGS. NDE, 00C. CONTROL) FEBRUARY. 1989 - l l l . l - , l i 10/29/85- - . - - - - _ . -. -. ._ . . --

- .... - - .. . .' - - . /N REVIEW TEAM \\ l .- . TEAM LEADERS

INDEPENDENCE FROM PROJECT '

SEASONED PROFESSIONALS

EXPERIENCED IN NUCLEAR INDUSTRY

ENGINEERING. CONSTRUCTION. QUALITY

STRONG PERFORMANCE RECORD ENGINEERS

INDEPENDENCE FROM CONTRACTORS

DEGREE IN RELATED ENGINEERING DISCIPLINE O EXPERIENCED IN NUCLEAR INDUSTRY

ENGINEERING. CONSTRUCTION. QUALITY REVIEWERS. INSPECTOR 1 , O INDEPENDENCE FROM CONTRACTORS

CERTIFIED TO ANSI STD. N45.2.6

EXPERIENCED IN NUCLEAR INDUSTRY TRAINING i

PROGRAM INDOCTRINATION PROCEDURES

PLANT FAMILIARIZATION . O PROJECT REQUIREMENTS (SPEC'S DWG'S, FSAR. QA PROGRAM.

PROCEDURES)

DOCUMENTATION OF TRAINING , - - + -. -,- _,. - - _ - -, ,, - _ _ - -, - _ _ _.. - _ _ -, _., -...,...,. _. _..., _ - - - - - .-m .-- _. -. -- - -

-. - - l - l .' CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION j DIRECTOR READINESS REVIEW OF PROJECTS PROGRAM MANAGER I ' I I iL, ,_ CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE OVERSIGHT _, PROGRAM MANAGER COMMITTEE , ENGINEERING - QA SUPPORT SUPPORT , (TYPICAL).

REVIEW TEAM REVIEW TEAM REVIEW TEAM LEADER, LEADER, LEADER, ELECTRICAL TASK MECHANICAL TASKS CIVIL TASKS , DOCUMENT . REVIEW HARDWARE ~ REINSPECTION , WALKDOWN OF SYSTEMS RESULTS " ANALYSIS , REPORT WRITING stisiss ta - i .., - - -. ..,.. _ .,,,... _.,... - - - - -, - . _ _ -. -,, - - -.. - - - -, - - .. - - - - - -... -- -

. . - , E - = w w i'h s e e O V

E $ $ E] E .- __a 5 5 : E E =c E & = e 2 E c =

e w w e = - - z I E E

E E 8 3 d " g O

O W 'i EE 5 " m " d E d i W

E E O w Q d W G W ? 4 % s C E W x u m 8 5 > " E e a

O e e $" - C 5 e E E e e " e W ' .- g W 5 E 5 % S 5 8 g S 8

g b E 9 E c " w s E . ->- - = - - w e a e - e - WNP-3 $ E E 8 S S g g g Q

w m

w a m w a a.

w c = - a r CONTRACT

K J d J d i d & d J K J NUMSER - - - - 002 CE X X X 204 PTL X X X 209 AS&G X X 213 C8&I X X X m - % 216 ATKINSON X X X X X X e5-218 POM X X 219 80C/FEG X X b ' 221 LAMPSON X X X o E 224 M-K/EST/ LORD X X X X X X X X X X X X E 225/253 F&M X X' X X X X X X

231 McMULLDI X . 232 WALLACE/ SUPERIOR X X X 233 GRIllNEL X X X X X X X X X 235 CB&I X X 251/226 PKS X X X X X X X 256 McMULLOl X X 263 MK X X X X X X X 265 JA JONES X X X X X X X X X X _ l i I I I i , _

_ -.- - - . .. -.. _ _ _ . .. - . t O SOURCES FOR SEEKING PROBLEM AREAS .. . O NRC INSPECTION ITEMS

PROJECT 55(E)'S AND PART 21'S '

I & E BULLETINS

(

INPO CONSTRUCTION EVALUATION CRITERIA

INPO CPE RECURRING FINDINGS ' , O NCR TREND REPORTS ,

INDUSTRY TREND INFORM ATION t , I i O LESSONS LEARNED (SUPPLY SYSTEM, INPO, AND OTHER RRP'S) , l

HOT LINE REPORTS, ALLEGATIONS ! lO . .. . .. _ _ _ _... _ _ _.. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _... _. _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _, _ _ _ _.

. .. , ' Page 1 of 3 tV PROCEDURE OUTLINES CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM (INITIAL PROCEDURES) CAP-6.1 Organization & Responsiblities Identify Participants - Describe Responsiblities - CAP-6.2 Accountabilities Identify Program Actions - Assign Responsible Organizations - . CAP-6.3 Indoctrination . Program Familiarization - Plant Familiarization - Working Interfaces - Responsibilities - Minimum Reading List - Construction Assurance Program Procedures o o Selected FSAR Sections o Selected SPEC's ( Supply System ( Ebasco o Selected Site Procedures

---

A o 50.55(e) & Part 21 (hgntractor I Record of Indoctrination and Training Classes - CAP-6.4 Review Team Planning Selection of Participants - Indoctrination of Reviewers - Preparation of Review Plan - o Project Requirements Historical (NCRS, Audits, Dr's, NRC Reports) o j Population of Completion Work (CCCS, Pride, Etc.)

! o i Sampling Rationale - l f o Generic Problem Areas l l

Each Contractor's Work Entire Construction Period o - .. - _ _. -. . _ _ _ _ _ _ __.

- _ _ -. - - _ _ _ _ .- . ,_ _ - - _ _ _. _ .

.- - - - . ,.. - .. -... - - - -. . - . . , .. Page 2 of 3 'O Sampling Rationale (Cont'd) - o Preservation Components ' o Random Selection ' o Document Sample Prior to Use Checklist Preparation - - List Attributes to be Inspected / Reviewed o f o Acceptance Criteria Schedule for Review M)dule - Approval -

CAP-6.5 Preparation of Review Checklists

(Customize RCSW-01 from WNP-2 for WNP-3 CAP) - ! i CAP-6.6 Review Process Review Spec's -

o Determine Requirements o Determine Records Required , Obtain Records - o Component List tc QA Copy & " Package" Records for Protection o , o Originals Returned to QA o Central File & Handling in CAP Office Review Records - Completeness, Conformance with Records Requirements ' o o Technical Adequacy

Complete Review Checklist (each component) o o Record Findings on Open Items List , Inspect Hardware i - I o Locate Components, Assure Access o Obtain Project Assistance ' Complete Inspection Checklist o

Record Findings on Open Items List o Reconcile Hardware & Records - o Compare Open Items Lists i - i o Close Open Items

. rr-,, -- .a,- ,,, -,v ,,e-, ,,,,.~-,-,,m~ ,,,,,,,.,,.,-,,,,,-,,,,.,,_,,,~,n-,w-,n,-,,-,,,,,, ,.,-,v,--- -,,., - -,,- w-- -- - - -,. - -, -. ,v,<,

._ .- ._ - . . ,- .. Page 3 of 3 . (\\ Expedite NCR Re:olution & Feedback to CAP - Perform Analysis of Results - o Trends o Safety Significance Provide Feedback to Engineering Assurance Program - Adjust Review, Resample if Necessary - o Response to Analysis o Response to EAP Interface CAP-5.7 Deficiency Reyorting NCR's - Refer to Site Procedures - I DR's - Refer to Site Procedures - ' When to use each - CAP.6.8 Reports Module Reports - Format, Scope and Content to be Determined ' - Periodic Progress Reports to Supply System ' E - o Monthly to RRP . o Monthly to WNP-3 Periodic Progress Reports to NRC - o Schedule o Accomplishments Final Completion Report - CAP.6.9 Documentation Control (Customize RCSW-12 fr*,m WNP-2 for WNP-3 CAP) - . , ,, - -, , -..., - - - -. . _. - - _ _.. ...,-,.__y.-. _-, ._-...,,, -,. -_ _.. _.. _ _ _.. _.. _ _ _ _ _ _, _._. _,._,_,..._-,_., _ - - - - - - -

., . . e m o

@ ~ ~m - N

e ~ o.

3 t -

, g .. . n . - , .- I . .: ! ' '( -5

. . y ag :

.5 ' ~ '/

• W _-

- " ght .W

1.(. ) q-

e* .

3tt .*2 2*:'t*

e WW

-_, " * A*'

• a r -::j53.g%

$ = -~

75E

,;*8:5: ssest

a 58222tta E 343:s:s: w B

)

. . . g = = . . a . m W r 44J 4 44 m..J..a

. W ~ J J % 3 2 ~~ $ t S :

} $g . . .

, ... . gh W

-

. y[ T I' -

3a IS$ ij ~~ ws a. pe J.,_: -

-

i : =.. =. t :13. t,. - e

g

! a r t s e 2-s-1 5 sj.} : 22.9 " . E.t.. S W 1:. tut:

- 8&&2&. b E22 g.,8t . e - . = W E 44 4 5 did 4 , _.. A

~ O . A . . , ZW l M E l e-l .F.

- F

a a l 3g 3 "

z . i 05:"-

--.58 8=* =.!. . 3:: -.J ~ .c .J w . I w o E l 5 S 3,*: 32 W 3

O'I 51:- 5 2

• h

f.

• cc r, a u-{.t.e.f.3 3 6 S

e - t-B - - a.1 = 1 - 5, xr s 2,. z-8 ~..... . . ... ~.. -.ht %%%g e g.a_c 2_ da.)5, g _F O R ~a.. = . -.. E46444 4444 =. " c 3,C ~. W %..% %. %.% . F.

.' _x - . .. .e - .. ~ 5d4A4J ddii 5 dia ". 44J ^

_*

. -. ~ ,,,, !

, w g

. Cg C.

~

W

. b ~: 5l

s1

se - . m-- J q d W g W g g a =* s -

25 W a

$0 N I. "w.3 r

a f-5 8g e m M I E y Ea I

8g =, - F $:r{1.3,y g gog] - *~ ~M go--- w E" a = %

t

%92 " g

m

w, e

-- o a w -- 4 I,t ,, . = s.y 5-

1. =

3EE

1. =

• =

g t o g sg.k.2 3 I* *

z

g g, t,:s v. 1 4.2 E. t.b..j l.

22M==g

{2 Wrg O E E . p

1

- =, s t a= =3 r

" e. t s g : - 5g=*a., . .- -- - ,

.=-3-5 . @l Mv 3g**km t8 g D . E iEE g

e.

ge - 3-EEEE 8 - ~,... . - ~ - EEEE = .. .. .. g... . _ g e

4a;;;

= ssa = .: 4xs;a .. - w ZQW s 1. & E e - }}