IR 05000508/1985004

Mgt Meeting Rept 50-508/85-04 on 850702.Major Areas Discussed:Engineering Assurance & Preservation of Assets Preventative Maint Programs.Viewgraphs Encl

ML20133P125
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	07/22/1985
From:	Dodds R, Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133P113	List: IR 05000508/1985004 ML20133P110
References
50-508-85-04-MM, 50-508-85-4-MM, NUDOCS 8508140163
Download: ML20133P125 (43)

Text

.

,

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY Com!ISSION

REGION V

Report N /85-04 Docket N Construction Permit N CPPR-154 Licensee: Washington Public Power Supply System 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 Facility Name: Washington Nuclear Project 3 Meeting at: Satsop Information Center, Elma, Washington Date: July 2, 1985 Prepared by: .k , _ Mc 7 [6 g R. ' Dodds,1;1def , Reactor Projects, Section 1 llate ' Signed ss -

Approved By:

D. F! Kirsch,

'

b

. Ing Director

~7 7- f f_

te igned Division Reactor Safety and Projects Summary:

Meeting on July 2, 1985, to examine the Supply System's proposed readiness review programs for design review and plant preservatio l i

8508140163 850722 l PDR ADOCK 05000500 i G PDR j

l

. - _ .

'

-

,

.

2. General The Supply System has previously met with NRC representatives to discuss the proposed readiness- review programs for WNP-1 and WNP- In the Supply Systems letter of May 22, 1985, a specific request was made that

,

the NRC agree to review the program description of Readiness Reviews at WNP-3 and WNP-1 for approval, agree to participate in the Readiness Review at WNP-3 and WNP-1 and review the Preservation Program Description for approva In letter G03-85-283 dated May 24, 1985, the Supply System sent a copy of

'

the preservation program entitled " Preservation of Assets Preventative Maintenance Program" for NRC review and approval. The description of the programatic controls for the Preservation Program were subsequently furnished with G03-85-358 dated June 28, 1985, which was also submitted for NRC review and approva In letter G01-85-0127/G03-85-0299 dated June 3, 1985, the Supply System requested review and approval of the Design Review Program entitled

" Engineering Assurance Program (EAP)".

, The purpose of the meeting on July 2, 1985 was to reviev the status of the WNP-3 project and the aforementioned submittals pertaining to the Preservation Program and Engineering Assurance Program. Attached are copies of the slides used by the licensee during the presentation of the proposed programs for NRC consideratio The licensee stated that an independent group from outside the Supply System will be utilized to assess and audit the effectiveness of the Readiness Revie The licensee responded as follows, for specific issues / questions:

An independent group from_outside the' Supply System will be utilized

to assess and audit the effectiveness of the progra Procedures will be developed that detail how each design process review is to be conducted.-

The readiness review will verify that the documentation inventory is complet Maintenance Work Requests are reviewed by Engineering after work has

'

been complete *

The cathodic protection system is On-line and has been balanced several time Generally, the manufacturer's recommendations are followed for l preventative maintenance for the protection of equipment, including 1 l surveillance frequency and insulation resistance test t l,

The control room is manned continuously by at least two persons per -

i shif .

I

.

. - . - . . . . ..

.

.

.

,

i The Regional Administratbr expressed concern ~as to the existence of a structured program for configuration control to assure that control over maintenance and work cress inside the plant does not diminish during the years of mothballing; emphasizing the need to make absolutely certain

that if something is'taken apart, it is properly reassembled and documented. . He cautioned that over-the years unusual circumstances can 4 occur. The Supply System.needs to make sure the inventory is complete so

. a new generation can pickup the projec '

Supply System management responded, stating that is the heart of what they are doing and that there have not been any big surprises so far in

the preservation of'the plant.

'

~

The only comment from the public was fro a member of EFSEC who stated that the Council supported the Readiness Review and Preservation

>

Programs.

1

,

i

!

l

!

..- - . , , . -_ - ,. . . - . , - . . . _ _ _ , , _ _ _ , - . . . . ,. . - _ - . . ..

-

..

~

l

'

PROJECT STATUS l

.

WNP-3 - 1250 MWE PWR e CONSTRUCTION STARTED APRIL 11. 1977 ENGINEERING 90% COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION 761 COMPLETE e AE: EBASCO SERVICES. IN e NSSS: COMBUSTION ENGINEERING e CM: EBASCO SERVICES. IN e MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS e EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY FROM JUNE 1983 s

e PLANT IN PRESERVATION STATUS FOR RESUMPTION OF CONSTRUCTION e ENGINEERING / DOCUMENTATION / LICENSING CONTINUITY MAINTAINED e NRR PREPARATION OF DRAFT SER

-. _ __ -

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

-

'.

.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (PM) PROGRAM ADMINSTRATION e SPECIFIC PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS DEVELOPED FOR EACH TYPE OF EQUIPMEN e REQUIREMENTS ENTERED INTO COMPUTER SYSTEM ( THE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE COMPUTER SYSTEMS ARE INTERACTIVE.)

4 e COMPUTER SYSTEM PRODUCES HARD COPY OF REQUIREMENTS AS SCHEDULE DICTATE e WORK IS PERFORMED. DOCUMENTED AND REVIEWED BY SUPERVISO .

e COMPLETION DATA AND COMMENTS ENTERED BACK INTO COMPUTER SYSTEM e LATE REPORTS GENERATED BY COMPUTER IF COMPLETION DATA NOT ENTERED.

.__ , .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________

.

. ,

.

..

PROGRAM DURING EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY PLAN FOR EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY WAS DEVELOPED FOR EACH PLANT - REFINED E ACH YEA FY-85 WNP-3 ANNUAL BUDGET $59.1M MANPOWER LEVEL (SITE) 402 ACTIVITIES e PLANT PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE

,

e CONSOLIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF RECORDS e ENGINEERING CONSOLIDATION AND COMPLETION e LICENSING CONTINUITY. AND FOLLOW THROUGH e CONTRACT CONSOLIDATION AND CLOSE OUT e RESTART PLANNING AND PREPARATION e PROJECT ENHANCEMENT STUDIES  :

I I

l l

,

.

- ._- . . - . ._ ___

. _ - _ .-_._ _ - . - _ . . . . . .

. - _ _ ._ .

_

.

.

.

. .

READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM WHAT IS IT:

e A SERIES OF REVIEWS TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF AN ACTIVIT e FOR THE SUPPLY SYSTEM THE SERIES OF REVIEWS ENCOMPASS THE IMPLEhENTATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DESIGN. CONSTRUClION AND PREPARATION FOR OPERATION e PROGRAM HAS SUPPLY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMEN ALONG WITH NRC PARTICIPATIO .

r

-- , - - . _ , _ . - - . . _ -. m_- - -_.- , . m. -- --- - -- ,, , . - -,m.-

-- - - - - , - - . - , , - - - - , . - -, - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - -

O

• %

l

, l l

l l

WHAT DOES THE PROGRAM ACCOMPLISH 7 e GIVES MANAGEMENT ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE THAT QUALITY-RELATED PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN DETECTE e PROGRAM GIVES CONFIDENCE AS THE WORK PROGRESSE e PRECLUDES SURPRISES AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION.

,

- - . -- - - . _ _ _ . - - - - -.

- -_. . - . - - . . - - - . , . . , - . - . ,.,.c ..- ,,

i

.

.

.

. .

READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM G0ALS e WHEN A REVIEW IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED, ALL ISSUES RELATED TO THAT SUBJECT WILL HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND ANSWERE e FSAR AND SER QUESTIONS FINISHE . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .

_ _

g I

' %

I CURRENT ACTIVITIES e NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - SOME SMART WORK TO HELP PRESERVATION

!

e SOME DESIGN ON-GOING e DESIGN STATUSING BEING CONDUCTED e PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED e NO PREPARATION FOR OPERATION

i r

l

{ ._ _._ ..__ .__ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _

_- _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

. ., .

. .

SU. PLY SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM SINCE OUR PROJECTS ARE NOT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTIO OUR REVIEW PROGRAM MUST BE DIVIDED INTO TWO PHASE INITIAL PHASE -

TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BEFORE

'

RESUMPTION OF CONSTRUCTION.

-l 0 SECOND PHASE -

BEGINS FOLLOWING RESUMPTION

!

0F CONSTRUCTION AND IS COMPLETE BEFORE OPERATING LICENS .4

. _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . , . _

'

- .

. .

.

INITIAL PHASE e REVIEW OF WORK COMPLETED TO DAT e FOCUS ON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES AND ON

,

THE PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION.

I e SAMPLE PRODUCTS OF THESE PROCESSES AND DRAW CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEW GOAL: REVIEW FOR ACCEPTANCE. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED TO DATE. THE RESULTS OF THE INITIAL PHASE WILL BE THE FIRST INCREMENTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJEC I l

l

. _____ _

_ _ _ _ _ . .. __ _ _ - _ - - ._. _ _. _ . . _ _ . _ _ - . .

I

, ,.

. .

l l

,

SECOND PHASE e REVIEW 0F CONTROL SYSTEMS PUT IN PLACE TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTIO e REVIEWS WILL BE CONDUCTED TO INCREMENTALLY ACCEPT THE PROJECT WORK AS IT PROGRESSES TOWARD LICENSING AND FUEL LOA DETAILS OF THE SECOND PHASE WILL BE DISCUSSED BEFORE RESTART OF CONSTRUCTIO QQ8L: COMPLETION OF THE SERIES OF REVIEWS WILL RESULT IN AN SER WITH NO OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS.

.

t

_. - . _ _ _ _ , . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ __ _ __ .. __ __ _ _.. . _._._ _ _ , _ ._

-

. .

. .

. .

.

MANAGING DIRECTOR DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR I I I DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS LICENSING & ASSURANCE PROGRAM PROGRAM MANAGER DIRECTOR READINESS REVIEW e READINESS REVIEW GROUP REPORTS TO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.

'

INDEPENDENT OF THE PROJEC ,

, _ - ,

. _ --

.

,

< .

,

. ,

,

. READINESS REVIEW

'

ORGANIZATION PROGRAM MANAGER L. J. GARVIN

..

, , ,

i i , , , , , , ,

-- ._ ._

. . -

LICENSING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ASSURANCE MANAGER ASSURANCE MANAGER G. C. Sorensen G. A. Block L. J. Garvin

-

-

( Acting)

,

o USIflG IflDIVIDUALS l'ATRIXED FR0f1 OTHER CORPORATE GROUPS.

i

. , . _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ ,_ . - _ - _ ., ., , . - -

.. __

.

,

'. <,.

,,

a DESIGN ASSURANCE e SAMPLES DESIGN

!

l

e DRAWS CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THAT REVIEW

AND FROM THE RESULTS OF ALL THE DESIGN REVIEW '

.,

l e GET3 FEEDBACK FROM THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEW 0F CONSTRUCTION AND PRESERVATION.

!

!

e DETAILS TO BE DISCUSSED LATER.

!

,

.

- _ _ , . . . - , _ . - . . . . . _ . - _ _ . _ . _ . . - - _ . - , - - _ , - . . . . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . . . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . - _ , . . , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - _

'. ..

/

CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE e SAMPLE EACH CONTRACTORS WORK.

,

e SAMPLE SIZE DEPENDENT ON NATURE AND AMOUNT OF WOR HISTORY OF CONTRACTOR AND THE RESULTS OF ANY SPECIAL PROGRAM e REVIEW WILL CONSIST OF REINSPECTION /WALKDOWNS USING THE SAME CRITERIA AS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION e WALKDOWNS INCLUDE DESIGN ENGINEERS -

TO ASSESS EFFECT OF OTHER CONSTRUCTIO e ADEoVACY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESERVATIO WILL ALSO BE REVIEWE).

,

e DEFICIENCIES WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND RESOLVE e THE NEED FOR INCREASED SAMPLING WILL BE BASED UPON THE NUMBER AND SIGNIFICANCE OF DEFICIENCIE e DETAILS OF PROGRAM TO BE PROVIDED BY AUGUST 198 e APPROVAL OF PROGRAM DESCRIPTION IS REQUESTED BY OCTOBER 198 . _ _ _ _ .. _ _. . _ _ _ -

9 ,

e .#

t e PRESERVATION e PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT STARTS UPON RECEIPT OF AN ITE e PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED AT THE TIME DELAY WAS ANNOUNCE STILL ON-GOING.

,

• O e DETAILS TO BE DISCUSSED BY A. D. KOHLER.

I j

, l l

. _ .

-

. .

. ,e

.

,.

'

SCHEDULE LONG TERM DESIGN REVIEW

START

-

JULY 1. 1985

!

!

i FIRST REPORT TO NRC - JANUARY, 1986

!

i REVIEW REPORTS SUBMITTED TO NRC EVERY 3-4 MONTHS THEREAFTE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW

START -

JANUARY, 1986 FIRST REPORT TO NRC'- JULY, 1986

'

~

REVIEW REPORTS SUBMITTED TO NRC EVERY 2-3 MONTHS THEREAFTER.

l

!

I

i

____ _ _

_ . , _ . , . . . . _ _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ___-._ __.__ ,___ _ _ -

._ _ _ . . - - _ _ .

>

.

o

.

. . .

-

.  :

.-

,

.

I a

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT N0. 3'

JULY 2. 1985

!

-

i

! .

I

i i

.

!

!

,

I l

i

.

.

t t

l 1 07/02/85 i

!

) , , , , , , ,

. , , , , _ . _ . , - , , _ _ , _ , , _ , , , , , _ _

e r w. - a c-, E -w . ~_ ., . . _ .

- _. __-_ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ - - _ ~ _ _ - _ _ _ - -

_ , _ .__ . . _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _

'

.

.

. .

-

.

. .

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PURPOSE:

.

TO INCREASE CONFIDENCE IN THE DESIGN OF THE WNP-3 PLANT AND TO PROVIDE A DOCUMENTED BASIS FOR THE ACCEPTANCE. BY BOTH SUPPLY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND THE NRC. OF THE COMPLETED DESIGN OF WNP- (1) NEAR TERM ACCEPTANCE OF DESIGN COMPLETED TO DATE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RESTART.

l

!

4 (2) FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED DESIGN BASED ON AN

ONGOING DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS RATHER THAN A LAST-l MINUTE MAJOR EFFORT.

)

I

,

J

!

,

'

2 07/02/85

.

, - , . - , ~ . - , - . . , - - . , . . . . - . . , , , , , , . , ,,._.._a - - -~. ,- ,_, ,,_., ,- n.,,. + , ,w~.,

. - . .. . _ .-. . _ _ _ _ .

'

, .-

,

LN WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW

!

NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN:

0 THE DESIGN FUNCTION ASSEMBLES ALL TECHNICAL AND HUMAN REQUIREMENTS FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES INTO AN INTEGRATED DESIGN OF A FUNCTIONAL UNIT. THE POWER PLAN t

-

0 IT EMCOMPASSES THE SITE. SYSTEMS. STRUCTURES. COMPONENTS. AND THE HUMAN INTERFAC O THE PRODUCTS OF DESIGN ARE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION O THE PROCESS OF DESIGN IS THAT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS LEADING TO THE PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION O NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN ALSO INCLUDES RECONCILIATION OF THE DESIGN WITH THE ACiUAL PHYSICAL INSTALLATIO O

f\)

i 05 u

-

- - . -. .. _ . ..

,.-

-

.:'

a: WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW 0 THE DESIGN OF A NUCLEAR PLANT IS A COMPLICATED AND PRECISE ACTIVITY TYPICALLY SPANNING MANY YEAR O THE DESIGN PROCESS IS PROCEDURALIZED AND DOCUMENTED TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY AND TO AVOID DEPENDENCE ON HUMAN MEMOR !

O THE PROCESS IS CHECKED BY AN INDEPENDENT QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION TO DETECT >

ANY DEVIATION FROM PROCEDURAL COMMITMENT AS AN ADDED MEASURE. THE SUPPLY SYSTEM HAS CREATED AN ORGANIZATION SEPARATE FROM BOTH THE PROJECT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE GROUP O THE NEW ORGANIZATION IS STAFFED WITH SENIOR TECHNICAL PERSONNEL WHO CAN RECOGNIZE GOOD OR BAD DESIGNS OR PRACTICIE O THE STAFF IS INDEPENDENT OF THE PROJEC O THE INDEPENDENT STAFF REVIEWS THE PRODUCTS OF DESIGN (DRAWINGS. SPECIFICATIONS AND HARDWARE). AND THE DESIGN PROCESS THAT CREATED THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. AND REPORTS ON THE RESULTS OF THOSE REVIEW O ANY PROCESS OR PRODUCT DEFICIENCIES ARE CORRECTE ?

kj 0 AN INDEPENDENT (NON-SUPPLY SYSTEM) OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MONITORS AND REPORTS ON THE g- INTEGRITY OF THE PROGRA m

_ _ ~

'

.

. .

-

.

.

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW PARTICIPANT REQUIREMENTS 0 DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF INDEPENDENCE FROM PROJECT AND/0R MAJOR CONTRACTOR O NOT INVOLVED IN ORIGINAL DESIGN EFFORT FOR TOPIC BEING ADDRESSED.

l i

,

0 QUALIFIED BY TRAINING / EXPERIENCE AS EXPERTS IN THE SUBJECT l

UNDER REVIEW.

j 0 EXPERIENCED / QUALIFIED IN CONDUCTING SIMILAR REVIEW EFFORTS.

!

O TEAM LEADER REPORTS TO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.

i i

I

!I

!

I

'l i 5 07/02/85

l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____________________ ..=_m .m ._,m- . _ _ _

+

. - - - _ --

_

I

..

o

,

W Z

l W m 4 3 . g W w m m >

H & * M H Z 2 W H

>U < o M U Z W H M M W

,

' W J W 4 b i W & D < @

W & W W W o W H 2 2 >

Z o W H Q H U E H W Q W U H i 4 O O J W <

W W A J H W

& & N E J m O Z M M o Z M Z O 2 O H W M O H C E W c W H M o < m W z z W

-

'

M C U E H E W W W W C W A >

Q > x o Z o W H O M & W C M j-M = A z z I H w E H o .

1 Z C o < A H Z W Z m H M 2 3 C 4 M C Z W W

= W o < m c E W m = = A 2 W L z o A M W H e W < H O H O M <

c J r m M - > W = =

'

2 A M o H H W b o <

H E E N K o M E E O - < = = r W < W A W 6 A < A W m z M W o > o j

x w W J w w w x H Z o - M o = m o W

- e - e s w w e A M < > W > m H m = A O E = O o o w 2 < < < o < m w O = = M = = m o W W G W C O W W W M J W W o X W Z O M M M Z Q E < Q W O

- < m r < a O < O <

m W L J J E J J >

o M M <

O 3 3 1 1 1 1 l i T

i o o o o 6 07/02/85 ,

.. -

e I e

.

t '. -

l- .

l WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - GENERAL APPROACH 0 TWO PHASES 0 PHASE I - DESIGN COMPLETED TO DATE

-

BASELINE (DESIGN COMPLETED STATUS)

-

DESIGN PROCESS REVIEW

-

DESIGN PRODUCT REVIEW

-

DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION INTERFACE REVIEW

-

INTERIM REPORT / CONCLUSION O PHASE II - DESIGN THROUGH COMPLETION

-

DESIGN PROCESS CHANGE REVIEW

-

ONGOING DESIGN PRODUCT REVIEW

-

CONSTRUCTION / TESTING FEEDBACK REVIEW

-

FINAL REPORT / CONCLUSION

.

.

7 07/02/85

'

.

T

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .

'

.

-

.

_

l

.'

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PHASE I (JULY 1985. TO RESTART)

0 COMPLETE THE SYSTEM DESIGN STATUSING PROGRAM NOW UNDER-WA THIS ESTABLISHES A BENCHMARK FOR EACH SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY DESIGN WORK COMPLETED TO DAT O PERFORM A SERIES OF INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEWS TO SAMPLE THE P90 DUCT OF DESIGN PERFORMED TO DAT THIS PROVIDES CONFIDENCE IN PRODUCT AS STATUSE O REQUESTED NRC INVOLVEMENT

-

ENDORSEMENT OF THE PROGRAM PLAN

-

FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED WORK 0 OPTIONAL NRC INVOLVEMENT

-

ENDORSE REVIEW TOPICS

-

REVIEW SCOPE OF SELECTED REVIEWS

-

PARTICIPATE ON SELECTED REVIEWS ~

-

REVIEW RESULTS, FOLLOWUP ACTION

-

ATTEND " EXIT" MEETINGS l

-

MONITOR TRACKING AND CLOSURE OF FINDINGS 8 07/02/85

-. ....... .. .-. -. . ,,-. . . - - . . - . - . . - _ _ . - . . , .

y

o

'

.

..

.

.

I WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PHASE II i l

l

,

(RESTART TO FUEL LOAD)

0 ONGOING INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW 0 ONGOING FEEDBACK FROM CONSTRUCTION REVIEW 0 PREOPERATIONAL TESTING RESULTS REVIEW 0 TRACKING AND CLOSE0VT OF OPEN ITEMS 0 ONGOING INVOLVEMENT OF NRC 0 FINAL REPORT PROVIDING BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE. BY BOTH SUPPLY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND THE NRC, OF THE COMPLETED DESIGN 9 07/02/85 J. - . ---

._

.

..,,N .,'.,-

.

- - - - - . . . , - , - , , - - . .

-

--- f;

. .

.

ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1f TOPIC SELECTION

.

1f II PARTICIPANT SELECTION I

II

.l g DEV. REVIEW PLAN l 1r ENTRANCE MTG

1f I r PERFORM l REVIEW I

i V THIRD PARTY EXIT MEETING REVIEWS 1 f 1f ASSEMBLE DRAFT REPORT

'

v 90 II 4T DAYS REVIEW DRAFT WITH EAP MNGR (SIGN FOR APPROVAL)

.

1 f PRINT, DISTRIBUTE &

FILE BARE REPORT (W/O DISPOSITIONS)

1r TRACKING i

> SYSTEM If if if if (TS)

AVAILABLE AT FILE AT l

TO NRC CORPORATE (F) PROJECT

'I 1f 1r 7/02/85

l

.

.

.  !

-

l l

I

'

.

TRACKING

> SYSTEM If if if lf (TS)

AVAILABLE AT FILE AT TO NRC CORPORATE (F) PROJECT if if EAP MNGR DISCUSSES APDE PREPARES WITH QA & PROJECT RE: RESPONSE RE-PM 21*S CORRECTIVE ACTION .53(erS *

ETC. & INTERFACES WITH

,

4FR'S CORPORATE-ETC

If lf TRANSMIT C ISSUES 21*S & 55(eTS -

ISSUES RESPONSE DOC TO NRC MENT TO CORPORATE ISSUES OFR'S n

U k (F)

QA TRACKS CORPORATE REVIEWS

REPORTABLES RESPONSES _

---

_---

if _ _ _ _ _

(F)

CORP.ASSEM l (F) .lSSUES FI I APDE FOLLOWS DINGS / RESPONSE UP ON ACTION ROLL.UP DOC l TRANSMIT TO ITEMS C (DIRECTOR AP-NRC PROVAL)

_ _ _ _ _. _ i _ _TRACKING

_ _ _J i

& & TRACKING (PROJ)

y PERIODIC U DATES TO NRC 4 _ _ _ _ _ _Y (EAP)

&

__

-

(CA)

7/02/85

- ~

.

._ .

'

.

~

.

-

.'

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW POTENTIAL INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW TOPICS (EXAMPLES)

0 SYSTEM INTERACTION REVIEWS 0 PIPINGlHANGER DESIGN REVIEW 0 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW 0 ELECTRICAL DESIGN REVIEW 0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 0 MISCELLANEOUS REVIEWS 0 SPECIAL REVIEWS BASED ON CONSTRUCTION REVIEW RESULTS

.

0 EoUPMENT QUALIFICATION PROGRAM REVIEW 0 HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN REVIEW 0 4 - 5 TOPICS SELECTED WITHIN 1 - 2 MONTHS 0 APPROXIMATELY 13 TOPICS REVIEWED OVER A PERIOD OF ABOUT 3 YEARS

!

12 07/02/85 .,

-

. .

.

-

. ,

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW i

PREVIOUS REVIEWS 0 WILL BE EVALUATED FOR POTENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS FOR FOLLOWUP DURING THE READINESS REVIE O WILL BE EVALUATED TO DETERMINE IF THEY CAN AUGMENT THE PRESENT PROGRA I B

S

- _ _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ _ -

.,.-

. ,-

WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW

SUMMARY OBJECTIVES 0 TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN INCREASED CONFIDENCE IN THE ADEQUACY OF OVERALL DESIGN ACTIVITIE O TO OBTAIN NRC CONCURRENCE THAT THE PROGRAM WILL MEET ITS OBJECTIVES IF CARRIED OUT AS PR0 POSE ,

O TO OBTAIN NRC ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED WORK IN INCREMENT O TO MAINTAIN HIGH PROGRAM INTEGRITY AND CONTINUED NRC INVOLVEMENT SO THERE WILL BE

'

NO NEED TO REVISIT THE SAME SUBJECTS (UNLESS CHANGES OCCUR).

O TO ALLOW SUPPLY SYSTEM AND NRC ACCEPTANCE OF THE TOTAL PLANT DESIGN UPON COMPLETION OF ALL DESIGN BASED ON THE ONGOING INCREMENTAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROGRA O B

S

Qk

_ _ _ ..

. _A %.m

.

o

,

,

WNP-3 PRESERVATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW SQAL: TO PROVIDE THE CONTROLS SUCH THAT EQUIPHENT. SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS. AT THE WNP-3 PROJECT. ARE MAINTAINED AND PRESERVED IN AN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION DURING THE CONSTRUCTION DELA .

.

l

. -- -

.- -

. --

'

.

.

,

THE MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS CONTAIN SEVERAL LAYERS OF DETAIL:

-

" SUPPLY SYSTEM WNP-3 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND PRESER-VATION PROGRAM" SERVES AS THE OVERALL CONTROL DOCUMEN (PROVIDED TO THE NRC ON JUNE 28. 1985.)

-

WMC-051. " PRESERVATION OF ASSETS - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM" CONTAINS BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTENANC (PROVIDED TO THE NRC ON MAY 24, 1985).

_

-

SPECIFIC PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE EQUIPMEN COMPONENTS. AND SYSTEMS AT THE PLAN (AVAILABLE AT THE PLANT)

i

!

!

,

I w.~

.

-

.

_

.

.

i i

,l PROGRAM CONTROLS

!

e PROGRAM CONTROLS DERIVED FROM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS IN FSA e BOTH THE OPERATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL AND DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION QA PROGRAM APPLY.

)

i

!

i

>

I

.,

_ , , . , - . - . _ - , _ . . . _ - _ . _ _ - - - _

_ , , _ , _ _ , , . - , ~ - - - ,

l .-

l

.

WNP-3 PRESERVATI0fl ORGANIZATI0il CHART l .-

l l

SUPPLY SYSTEM l EBASCO l

l l

WilP-3 PROGRAF 1 DIRECTOR l l

DEPUTY PRCGRAM DIRECTOR l l

l l

'

PROJECT -------------- ----------

QA l l l

PLANT l MANAGER l PROJECT l GErlERAL MAflAGER l

OPS -----------------

l --------- OA QA l l l l l l l TECHilICAL f1AlflTEllANCE reauitements MAtlAGER f1AflAGER - ------ ----------i------------------- Cri AE i

l l

l l

e CHAP.T CONTAINS ORGAflIZATIONS HAVillG PERFORf1ING l RESP 0flSIBILITIE l CHART 1 l

l l

l l

l l

!, . _.-

.

.

.

.

.

REQUIREMENTS WMC-051 " PRESERVATION OF ASSETS - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM" e PROGRAM DOCUMENT THAT PROVIDES BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL CLASSES OF EQUIPMEN BASED UPON MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION EXPERIENCE. NATIONAL STANDARDS. ET e APPROVED BY EBASCO AS AE. AND THE SUPPLY SYSTE e CHANGES TO WMC-051 WILL BE MADE AS EXPERIENCE IS GAINE BUT ONLY AFTER ENGINEERING APPROVA i l

l l

l l

Y

. - - _ . - -

. .

'

.

.

,

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE e WHEN PROBLEMS ARE IDENTIFIED MAINTENANCE WORK REQUESTS ARE WRITTE s e WHEN - DURING PM OR AT ANY OTHER TIM e BY WHO - ANYONE CAN WRITE AN MW e MWR - DESCRIBES THE PROBLEM AND IS ROUTED TO MAINTENANCE FOR RESOLUTIO e MWR CAN BE SELF STANDING OR REQUIRE THE USE OF DETAILED PROCEDURES, e REVIEWED. AND HOLD POINTS ESTABLISHED BY Q e WORK IS PERFORMED INSPECTED. DOCUMENTED AND REVIEWED BY SUPERVISIO e DATA ENTERED INTO MWR COMPUTER SYSTE e HARD COPY FILE _ _ . .. .. .. .. __. - _

-

t .

.

-

,

.

.

.

.

VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES e AUDITS AND SURVEILLANCES OF THE PM ACTIVITIES ARE CONDUCTED BY THE QA GROUPS AT THE PROJEC QUALITY CONTROL. WHICH IS PART OF OPERATIONAL QA, CONDUCTS HOLD POINT INSPECTION .

W4W

- -

- . - -

4

&

THE PROJECT HAS ESTABLISHED MONITORING PROGRAMS TO PROVIDE DATA TO CONFIRM THE ADEQUACY OF'THE MhINTENANCE PROGRAM OR TO PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT STRUCTURAL MATERIAL CORROSION MONITORING e ATMOSPHERIC CORROSION TEST RACKS IN THE FIELD AND PLANT BUILDING e COUPONS ARE MONITORED FOR GALVANIC AND PITTING CORROSIO e COUPONS REPRESENTATIVE OF PLANT MATERIAL l

)

- - ~ _ . . _ - . _

-

.

,

>

.

,

!'

HYGROTHERM0 GRAPH MONITORING e TEMPERATURE-HUMIDITY MONITORIN e INDICATES THE ENVIRONMENT THAT EQUIPMENT, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS HAVE EXPERIENCE e DATA PROVIDES:

e EARLY WARNING OF UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS THAT COULD LEAD TO DEGRADATIO e INPUT TO MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE 2 MEASURE e RECORDS OF ACTUAL EXPOSURE EXPERIENCED BY PLANT COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS.

,

w ..

. _ , . _ . _ . - _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _..__..__.._-__7 _ , . .m. _ . . _.,._ ___.. _.___ _ ._ _ _ _ _ . . . _ ._ . - - .

_ _ , - - - - - . - -

%

t I

,

CORROSION DATA IS USED TO:

o PROVIDE EARLY NOTIFICATION OF DEGRADING CONDITIONS SUCH THAT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS CAN BE TAKE e QUANTIFY DEGRADATION TO VERIFY THAT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS HAS NOT BEEN COMPROMISE e PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CAN RESUME WITH EXISTING STOCK MATERIAL.

i e PROVIDE A QUANTITATIVE BASIS FOR THE EVALUATION AS TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THE PLANT TO RESTART CONSTRUC-TION ACTIVITIE RESULTS ARE FEDBACK TO PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS TO MINIMIZE DEGRADATIO l l

!

l l

.n.