ML20206H104

Direct Testimony of TE Baldwin,Iw Husar & Je Keller.* Related Correspondence

ML20206H104
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	04/10/1987
From:	Baldwin T, Husar I, Keller J ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY, Federal Emergency Management Agency, IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
To:
Shared Package
ML20206H061	List: ML20206H058 ML20206H104
References
OL-3, NUDOCS 8704150259
Download: ML20206H104 (40)

Text

" .

L o -

e UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensina Board-In the Matter of )

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3

) (Emergency Planning)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power )

Station, Unit 1 )

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THOMAS E. BALDWIN, IHOR W. HUSAR JOSEPH H. KELT.RR 8704150259 PDR 87041o ADOCK 05000322 PDR

+

.., . . . . s. .,. ..., . ,... . . .. i . . : .

l A

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensina Board-In the Matter of )

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3

) (Emergency Planning)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power )

Station, Unit 1 )

! DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THOMAS E. BALDWIN, IHOR W. HUSAR JOSEPH H. KELT.FR

(

e e

l- - - - .-.___ _-......._ _ _ ____. _ ________ ___._ _ _ __. _ _,,_ _ ,, _ , _ _ , _ , , , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I'

. -Q.1. Please state your name and business address.

JA. Thomas E. Baldwin - Argonne National Laboratory, 277 Main Street, Second Floor Port Washington, NY 11050-A. Joseph H. Keller - Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company, Inc.

• P.O. Box 4000 Idaho Falls, ID 83401 A. Ihor W. Husar - Federal Emergency Management Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278 Q.2. Do you have statements of professional qualifications?

'A. Yes. Our statements of professional qualifications are attached to this testimony.

Q.3. When did'the panel members first become involved in emergency planning in general and specifically when did they first become involved in a review of the radiological emergency planning as it relates to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station?

i

O h' '$ A. With respect to Messrs Baldwin and Keller, these questions were addressed in the FEMA prefiled testimony in these proceedings dated April 17, 1984. .

Mr. Husar first became involved in emergency planning while serving in the U.S. Army on active duty as a Military Intelligence Officer from 1968 to 1972. From 1972 to 1979, Mr. Husar, .

after joining Career Federal service, specialized in security planning, working for several Department of Defense agencies. In 1979, he joined the Defense Civil Preparedness Agency, one of five predecessor agencies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). With that agency, in the New York office, Mr. Husar monitored and evaluated nuclear attack plans of state and local govern.ents. After FEMA was formed in July 1979, Mr. Husar continued involvement in emergency planning. From 1980 to 1982, Mr. Husar was responsible for the FEMA

[}

(,~,/

review of off-site radiological emergency preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants in New Jersey and New York. During that time, he served as Chairman, Regional Assistance Committee (RAC).

In 1983, Mr. Husar was selected as Branch Chief, National Preparedness Programs. In that capacity, he was responsible for Federal government preparedness programs in FEMA Region II. In that capacity Mr. Husar was responsible for assisting Federal Agencies in the Region in developing plans for national security emergencies.

In June 1986, Mr. Husar was reassigned to the FEMA Region II Natural and Technological Hazards Division as Supervisory Natural and Technological Hazards Programs Specialist. At that time, he was also appointed as RAC Chairman. Mr. Husar first became involved in a review of radiological emergency planning as it relates to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station on October 6, 1986, based on a request from the Agency's headquarters to review LILCO plan revisions 7 and 8. Mr. Husar, in his capacity as RAC Chairman, oversaw the technical review and consolidation of the RAC

( ,,

• review of Revision 7 and 8 of the LILCO Transition Plan.

i 1.: .

t

(

1-i Since the consideration and transmittal of the '

! RAC Keview of LILCO's Transition Plan, Revision l*

6, 7 and 8 on December 19, 1986 to FEMA Headquarters, Mr. Husar's involvement from that i date to the present has centered around required actions in connection with the two Shoreham ASLBs p

i (OL-5 and OL-3). i e

i 4 -- .

i I

) '

i h

I i

4

?

I 4

t i

i 1

l t

b t

l-l a

i v l

t i

_ .n_

i I

In the following testimony, FEMA has assumed that the reopened record will cover issues similar to those initially raised by CONTENTION 24.0 and by the factors remanded to the hearing Board by ALAB-832 with regard to Reception Center issues. FEMA has, however, transposed the 1atest version of the LILCO plan, i.e. Revision 8, into the conceptual setting of the above_ issues. In addition, the four additional issues accepted in the December 11, 1986 Board Order will be addressed below.

rs CONTENTION 24.0 ISSUE: There are no relocation centers available for a significant portion of the anticipated evacuees.

• ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan separates the functions of a relocation center into reception center functions and sheltering functions. This testimony will only address the reception center functions which are registration, radiological monitoring, and decontamination, if necessary.

As stated in the RAC review of Revision 8 of the plan, there'are three reception centers designated for the general public. The following three LILCO facilities have been designated (OPIP 4.2.3): Bellmore, Hicksville, and Roslyn Operations Centers. No letters of agreement are needed for the use of these facilities in an emergency, since these facilities are owned by LILCO. The facilities identified in the original contention (i.e., Revision 3 of the LILCO plan) were not owned by LILCO and thus required letters

(~ of agreement for their use. It is FEMA's position that there are now reception centers specified for the general public. However, as stated in the RAC review, under element J.12, the adequacy of these facilities as reception centers would have to be reviewed in a future exercise.

Such a review would involve a visual inspection of the facility, completely set up as a reception center, for a general verification against the plan description.

The RAC review of Revision 8 also states, under element J.12, that there are no reception centers specified for many of the evacuees from special facilities (special population reception centers). See OPIP 3.6.5 pages 22-37.

With regard to the number of evacuees to be planned for in an emergency, NUREG 0654 element J.12 states:

Each organization shall describe the means-for registering and monitoring evacuees at

[N relocation centers in host areas. The personnel and equipment available should be L

(' capable of monitoring within about a 12-hour period all residents and transients in the

O,/

s_ .

CONTENTION 24 (Continued) plume exposure EPZ arriving at relocation centers.

The issue which must be addressed is the definition of an acceptable value for the "all... arriving" phrase within element J.12. In the earlier hearings on this issue before the OL-3 Board, the FEMA witness panel testified that, based on experience gained from 4 natural disasters, the number of people that seek temporary sheltering is in the range of 10-15 % of the population instructed to. evacuate. The number of people seeking monitoring, regardless of their need for temporary sheltering, may be larger than the number of people who would seek sheltering. Therefore

' it is FEMA's position that a 20% figure is a reasonable figure to be used as a planning basis for compliance with NUREG 0654 e'lement J.12 for monitoring

within about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. This position has been stated in the December 24, 1985 letter from R. Krimm to NTH f

Division Chiefs, a copy of which has been served on all parties by FEMA counsel. The approximate 12-hour period for the radiological monitoring of evacuees is a recommended target for planning purposes and for

evaluating monitoring capabilities.

Unlike the element on monitoring, NUREd-0654 sets no time parameters for the performance of decontamination i activities. Good health physics practice would indicate that decontamination of any contaminated evacuees would be done as soon as is feasible. NUREG-0654 also establishes no parameters for the numbers of people which the decontamination facilities should be able to accommodate.

I l .

I i

l REMAND ISSUE A ISSUE: The location of the three reception centers and their distance from the plume EPZ boundary might cause transportation and

- traffic problems.

ANSWER: FEMA has no position on this issue. The NRC will sponsor a witness to address this issue.

I

. ._ -. ~. . . - = .. . . . . - - - - . . . - - . . . - . - . - -. . . . - . . . - - . - . . . . - . - . _ . . . -. .

4 i

i-J. REMAND ISSUE B

'- ISSUE: The' location and distance of the three

. reception centers from the plume EPZ boundary 4 might cause problems due to the shadow j '- evacuation phenomenon.

4

, ANSWER: FEMA has no position on the issue as stated.

1 4

4 I

l.

r 1

i l

i l

4 t

i r

i l

l

=

l l

i i

e l

l I

i 1

l i

b' i ,

i l l

i

1 REMAND ISSUE C ISSUE: The proposed use of the three reception centers requires authorization under State

, environmental laws.

ANSWER: FEMA has no position on this issue, except that FEMA is not aware that any other nuclear

< power plant in New York has had to have

authorization under State environmental laws

' for the reception centers in the respective plans for the various sites.

I h

I o

(*

V

\ ,) -11 .

REMAND ISSUE D

- ISSUE: The decontamination activities, if needed, which will be accomplished at the reception centers, might create health and safety

. problems by contamination of the public water supply.

ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan (OPIP 3.9.2, Section 5.2.11) states that contaminated liquid wastes which have been contained will be transported to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (SNPS) for disposal. If containment is not possible, the liquid waste will be diluted and dispersed.

The fact that decontamination is necessary is a result of a radioactive release which contaminates personnel and/or vehicles.

There are two ways in which contamination can be brought to the Reception Center. First, evacuees and/or their vehicles intercept a O portion of the airborne plume which would have otherwise deposited on the fixed surfaces in the plume path. Second, contamination could be picked-up by evacuees or their vehicles from an area previously contaminated by plume passage.

The act of reporting to a reception center for monitoring and decontamination does not create contamination (radioactive material);

it merely facilitates the movement of a portion of the radioactive material which was released to the environment by the incident.

A potential threat to a water supply (underground aquifer) is not caused by the process of decontamination of personnel and vehicles. If a threat exists, rain or snow falling on the surface of the land mass, which would also have been contaminated by the plume passage, would have a much greater potential for contamination of the aquifer. The problem, if any, created by the disposal of decontamination solutions is trivial when compared to potential problems resulting from leaching of radioactive O material deposited on the fixed surfaces in the plume path *.**

O .

REMAND ISSUE D

~*'

(Continued)

It.is FEMA's position-that the method proposed for the disposal of liquid waste generated by the decontamination of offsite personnel and equipment is generally acceptable. The plan lacks specific details on the size of containment tanks and how and where the disposal of uncontained liquids will occur. However, it should be noted that the LILCO plan contains about the same detail as other plans approved by FEMA Region II for other nuclear power sites in the region.

m In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region-II office, issued a letter. stating that, in essence, the method proposed in Revision 8 of the LILCO plan is an acceptable means of dealing with

. contaminated liquid wastes generated by decontamination of offsite personnel and

+

vehicles in an emergency. In the draft-revision of.the EPA Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for .

Nuclear Incidents (EPA-520/1-75-001) dated-June 27, 1986, the statement is made on page 7-36; "Do not waste (emphasis added) efforts trying to contain contaminated wash water",

when discussing the control of surface contamination on persons and equipment.

This statement is in agreement with the

-previous EPA Region II letter.

4 f

l I

l 1 e l

- -,- _.- _ , - -s . , . , . . _ . _ . - - . _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . - , _ . . _ _ , , . - , . _ _ - _ _ -

r i

. REMAND ISSUE E >

ISSUE: The distance between the boundary of the plume exposure EPZ and the designated reception centers will unacceptably increase

- the radiation exposure of contaminated individuals.

ANSWER: The three reception centers designated in Revision 8 of the LILCO plan are approximately 40 miles from the SNPS (page 4.2-1, line 5), which means that they are all approximately 30 miles from the boundary of the plume exposure EPZ. In addition, all" three reception centers are located southwest of the SNPS. The distance and direction from the plant are similar to those of the previously designated reception center, the Nassau Colesium.

In the review of plans, FEMA uses NUREG-0654 element J.10.h to evaluate the acceptability O of the location of reception centers.

Reception centers are to be at least 5 miles and preferably 10 miles from the boundary of the 10-mile EPZ (15 and 20 miles from the plant site). Beyond 20 miles some consideration must be given to the delay which might result from increased travel time. However, the delay _will not typically result in a medically significant increase in exposure. Reception centers in the 20 mile range are preferable in order to reduce the potential for the need to relocate the center in the event of a worse case incident.

A survey of reception centers and their distances from the EPZ boundary at other nuclear power plant sites indicates that there are numerous reception centers designated for other nuclear power plants at distances comparable to those identified for Shoreham (see S. Glass letter dated February 12, 1985 to M. Miller, copies to the service list).

J ,

4

I .

REMAND ISSUE E (Continued)

During the earlier stages of these proceedings, FEMA did not find that the

- distance to the then designated reception center was unacceptable, notwithstanding the desirability of having a suitable facility (s) closer to the EPZ boundary. Since the three newly designated reception centers are approximately the same distance from the EPZ boundary as the previous reception center, there is no reason to find that these new reception centers are unacceptable due to distance from the EPZ.

G

.~.. - - .. .. -... _ - . - _ . . _ _ . . . . . - . .._.._. - -. - .. ._-.-_-..._-.- - _ - ._ - - . _

l i 4 . .

i 4

I 4'

t

{

4 BOARD ISSUE 1 ,

l- ISSUE: The evacuation routes to, and in the vicinity.

of, the proposed reception centers will cause '

unacceptable traffic congestion.

t

• ANSWER: FEMA has no position on this issue. NRC will sponsor a witness to address this issue.

I I

l k

+

I l

l l

I l

[

BOARD ISSUE 3

. ISSUE: The staffing requirements for the new system of three reception centers have not been adequately addressed.

ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan (OPIP 4.3.2 Attachment 2) lists the number of staff that will be assigned to the three general public reception centers. Attachments 3 - 5, of the same procedure, show a map of the locations of the assignments of the various staff. In addition to the monitoring teams shown on the layouts for each reception center, there are 12 additional monitors assigned to the Hicksville center to monitor evacuees arriving by bus.

The RAC review of Revision 8 of the LILCO plan found that element J.12 of NUREG 0654 was inadequate, partly because of the

/~'N procedure proposed for monitoring arriving

( ) vehicles and their drivers. The process of evaluating the number of personnel required to perform the proposed procedures would therefore appear to be fruitless.

It should be noted that based on the proposed procedures for monitoring bus evacuees, essentially the same procedure which was included in previous versions of the plan and found to be acceptable, the number of monitors assigned does not meet the 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> provision of NUREG 0654 element J.12, as explained below. The number of evacuees arriving at a reception center for monitoring is still under 'iscussion and is the subject of an appeal to ALAB-855. The outcome of that appeal has nothing to do with the number of trained personnel needed to monitor bus evacuees for the following reasons: (1) The current version of the plan states that all evacuees using LERO supplied buses as evacuation vehicles will be transported to the Hicksville reception center for monitoring. (2) The plan also states that the buses will be directed to the entrance of the

,vN operations building where the monitoring will

(' ) occur inside the main lobby (this area is

- separate from the monitoring areas designated for evacuees arriving in personal vehicles),

i

V BOARD ISSUE 3 (Continued)

(3) The planning basis in Appendix A page III-35 states that 8% of the year round population in residence do not have cars and could, therefore, require bus transportation for an evacuation.

If the assumption is made that the use of the average population is reasonable, 8% of the 138,500 winter residents could need bus transportation and would therefore be driven to the Hicksville reception center for monitoring. This figure of 11,080 evacuees would need to be monitored within about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> regardless of the percentage of the general population arriving at reception centers for which monitoring plans must eventually be made. Using the 90 second monitoring time per evacuee contained in OPIP

[

s, }/

3.9.2 Section 5.4.7.c, the 12 monitors assigned to the bus evacuee monitoring area could monitor 5760 evacuees in the 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> period. If the additional time required for thyroid monitoring as called for in OPIP 3.9.2 Section 5.10 is added, the short fall in monitoring personnel is even greater.

It should also be noted that the RAC review of Revision 8 of the LILCO plan, identified an additional basis for the inadequate finding for NUREG 0654 element J.12. The plan did not designate reception centers for many of the special facility populations and therefore the RAC could not verify the adequacy of the 25 monitors assigned to monitor evacuees from these facilities.

O

BOARD ISSUE 4 ISSUE: The proposal to transport all evacuees, using LERO buses for evacuation, to the Hicksville reception center is not acceptable since this

. facility has been designated as a relocation center for emergency workers and their families.

ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan designates the _

Hicksville Operation Office as a Relocation Center-(OPIP 4.6.1). However, on evaluation of the substance of the procedure, it is clear that this facility is intended as a congregate care center for LERO workers and/or their families (see Section 5.1.13).

It should be noted that the referenced section of the procedure has not been updated and still carries the superseded general population reception center designation within the body of the Section.

O <

From the diagrams within OPIP 4.6.1 and the discussion in OPIP 4.2.3 Section 5.6, FEMA concludes that the bus evacuees are registered, monitored, and decontaminated if necessary in areas separate from the areas used by the LERO workers and/or families. It is FEMA's position, that based on a review of the pertinent portions of the plan, there is nothing inherently unacceptable with the proposed method of handling bus evacuees.

-However, it should be noted that the RAC review of Revision 8 of the LILCO plan, states that the adequacy of the three new reception centers would have to be evaluated in a future exercise. Such an evaluation would involve visual inspection of the facility, completely set up as a reception center, for a general verification against the plan description.

I' 30ARD ISSUE 7

. ISSUE: The proposed method of monitoring the general public evacuees in the parking lots.of the three receptioncenters can not be implemented

.- in a way to adequately protect the public health and safety.

ANSWER: As stated in the FEMA response to BOARD ISSUE 3, the RAC review of Revision 8 of the.LILCO plan found NUREG element J.12 to be inadequate, in part because of the proposed method of monitoring the evacuees arriving by personal vehicle. The evacuees arriving by personal vehicles are the concerns of this issue.

Monitoring the evacuees in their vehicles in the parking lots does not enable the monitors to perform a complete " frisking" of the evacuees. Revision 8 of the plan calls for only monitoring the hands and the area around the drivers feet. Even if the monitoring personnel were to attempt to monitor.all of the passengers, there would be areas i.e.,

backs of legs, backs, etc., which could not be monitored adequately while the evacuees are in their vehicles. It should be noted that for the case where evacuees become contaminated by immersion in the plume, localized contamination is not likely. Where contamination is picked up from contact with previously contaminated items, the possibility of localized contamination is more probable. It is not likely that medically significant contamination would be picked up by this later case.

r

v

• 5 Thpx_W._ Bus.ar A native of Central New Jersey, Mr. Husar entered the emergency

• preparedness field in April 1979~, after working seven years in

- security-and intelligence for DoD, when hired by the Defense i

Civil Preparedness Agency. New York field office. Serving as a

. field representative, he was responsible for providing emergency  ;

. preparedness financial and technical assistance to New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

l' Mr. Husar has been employed by FEMA since its establishment and i

has served the New York Regional Office in many capacities. He was Chairman, Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) for state / local response planning surrounding nuclear power. plants.

He was Acting Division Chief Plans and Preparednesss, and has responded to Presidentially declared disasters throughout Region II. Mr. Husar performed a support role in the Love Canal emergency, as well as Puerto Rico and New York State hurricane i disasters.

Until the position was abolished in June 1986 Mr. Husar was i Branch Chief. National Preparedness Programs. He was directly i responsible for-the-management of Government Preparedness l' -

(Special Access Programs) and National Preparedness Programs in the region. He.was Executive Secretary, Regional Preparedness

- Committee (RPC) and was responsible for the Regional Emergency Response Team (RERT) plan development. He also served as

. . Regional Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) Program

. Coordinator.

' Currently, Mr. Husar is Supervisory Natural & Technological

~ Hazards Programs Specialist, in the Natural & Technological i Hazards Programs Division (NTH). As a result of an Agency i

Reduction in Force (RIF) Mr. Husar was reassigned to this i

position and was selected by the Acting Regional Director to serve again as RAC Chairman. Mr. Husar is currently responsible for the day to day ove,rsight of National Flood Insurance' Program (NFIP) in the region as well as technological hazards programs.

The latter program area includes off-site safety surrounding commercial nuclear power plants and response planning for peace time radiological accidents (including nuclear weapons accidents) and hazardous materials. In addition, he has retained responsibility for the Regional Emergency Response Team (RERT)

Plan.

Mr. Husar graduated from Rider College, Lawrenceville, NJ in 1967 l with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Secondary Education (History).

L He has completed pre-candidate work for a Masters in Business

Administration degree with Southern Illinois University.

I l'

t 2-In 1984. Mr. Husar was nominated for and completed Executive

Management training at the Executive Seminar Center, Kings Point.

NY. He has been the recipient of several awards during his

! career in the Federal government.

Mr. Husar is a Vietnam veteran, having served four years on active duty as an Army Intelligence Officer. He is currently a

. . Lieutenant Colonel in the US Army Reserves.

He presently resides in Marlboro. New Jersey and married 18

, years, and is the father of six children.

i 1

i i

1 b

}

l

}

i l

• i i ,r .

i 1

i i

I..._.._.___ _ - . . _ _ . _ _ _ . __ _ . _ . ____ _ ..__..___.-

THOMAS E. BALDWIN Environmental Systems Engineer Energy and Environmental Systems Division (EES)

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)

- Garden City, New York

• Eduestion Background Ph.D. 1973, Human Ecology and Demography, University of Cincinnati M.A. 1969, Sociology and Human Ecology, University of Cincinnati B.S. 1967, Sociology and Biology, Missouri Valley College Professional Experience 1983-present Environmental Systems Engineer, EES, ANL, Garden City, New York As Northeastern Regional Manager for support services provided by ANL under contract to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Dr. Baldwin is responsible for the scheduling and management of services furnished to the FEMA's

• Region I and !! offices in Boston and New York City. He is. experienced in reviewing state and local radiological emergency response plans and evaluating their capabilities to protect populations living in the emergency planning zones surrounding commercial nuclear power plants. Dr. Baldwin frequently served as a Federal observer and team leader at off-site radiological emergency preparedness exercises. He is responsible for the preparation and technical review of post exercise assessment reports detailing the results of these exercises.

l-i 1982-1983 Senior Demographer / Economist, Energy and Environmental Analysts, Inc. (EEA), Environmental Consultants, Garden City, i

New York i

j Responsible for analyzing the demographic, economic and social aspects of energy and industrial projects. Consultant to the Port Authority of New York and New

! Jersey, New York Public Development Corporation and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith, Inc., in assessing the economic feasibility of a satellite telecommunications facility for New York. Consultant to Argonne National Laboratory, in the review of l state and local off-site radiological emergency response plans for commercial nuclear i power plants in New England, New York, and New Jersey. Responsible for expanding EEA's base of clients who require assessments of economic return and the socioeconomic impacts associated with metropolitan development projects.

THOMAS L BALDWIN 2 Professional Experience (Cont'd) 1981-1982 Manager of Economics, Dravo Van Houten, Inc. (DVH),

Consulting Engineers, New York, New York Energy Economics - Managed marketing and project evaluation analyses of the oil and gas industry leading to corporate investment decisions. These studies were prepared both for internal use by Dravo Corporation and for clients of DVH.

Industrial Development Economics -

Developed proposals for the financial / economic feasibility of marine engineering projects that ranged in size from

!!mited, privately financed projects to large foreign regional development programs.

Reviewed and evaluated cargo forecasts and projections of regional economic growth used to obtain World Bank financing for container and bulk handling facilities proposed for the Port of Montevideo, Uruguay. Analyzed forecasts of the economic return from agro-industrial facilities proposed for the Port of Conakry, Guinea.

1979-1980 Senior Economist, PRC Harris, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Lake Success, New York Enerh and Environmental Studies - Analyzed the demand for low pressure gas reserves in rural upstate New York based on demographic trends and economic forecasts of future residential, commercial and industrial growth. Conducted the cost-benefit analysis of erosion protection measures for the U.S. Corps of Engineers project to protect commercial and residential developments along the Indian River Inlet in Delaware. Evaluated existing socioeconomic impact models for use by the Corps of Engineers Passaic River Basin Study Group. Analyzed the economic benefits of improving the channel to accommodate larger fishing vessels in the Woodeleft Canal at freeport, Long 'sland.

Industrial Development Economics -- Project Manager for Terminal Construction Corporation's site / financial feasibility study for the development of a wholesale food distribution center in the Hackensack Meadowlands, New Jersey. Directed regional planning and socioeconomic analysis of growth related to the proposed development of a large agro-industrial port planned for Damletta, Egypt. Technical responsibilities to these studies included the determination of optimal phasing and evaluating the economic return on investment from the proposed projects.

1972-1979 Social Economist, EES, ANL, Chicago, Illinois Soeiceconomic impact Assessmenta - Responsible for demographic, economic and sociological analyses undertaken as part of a variety of research projects sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). /These studies examined the socioeconomic impacts of changes in employment, population size and demographic composition that are

, associated with the construction and operation of large-scale energy projects.

j

THOMAS E. BALDWIN 3 Professional Experience (Cont'd)

Responsibilities required in-depth experience with regional economic and demographic project techniques, including export-base, input-output, and cohort survival methods.

The construction of social surveys, use of population sampling methods, multivariate regression techniques and statistical analysis of population composition were also an integral part of this work.

LDC Energy Assessments -- Developed the socioeconomic component of Argonne National Laboratory's role in the international Energy Development Program sponsored by DOE. Prepared detailed,' country-specific energy assessments for a number of countries. Specific responsibilities included the identification of socioeconomic issues and problems, policy analysis, the development of research methodologies and interaction with foreign representatives. Experience with the application of econometric models to planned and subsidized economies. Knowledge of specific econometric methods for estimating fuel-specific energy demand as a function of price elasticities was also used in this research.

Environmental Pollution Damages --

Joint Argonne National Laboratory /

University of Chicago, Department of Economics project sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to analyze relationships between environmental pollution and the regional economy. Several studies were completed. These included: a survey of Chicago coal users to determine the costs of conversion to other fuels, an inventory of building materials to estimate the costs of solling due to air pollution, and a multivariate regression residuals analysis that displays the geographic distribution of relationships ,

between socioeconomic characteristics of the population and air quality in the Chicago SMSA. Experience developed in the course of these studies included survey construction and sampling, economic cost-benefit analysis, and the use of air quality display models.

Professional Society Activities

{

l American Association for the Advancement of Science l American Sociological Association i Population Association of America 1.

4 l Publications: Journal Articles and Book Contributions Stenehjem, E.J., and T.E. Baldwin, A Framework for Detailed Site-Specific Studies of Local Socioeconomic Impacts from Energy Development, in Progress in Socioeconomicss

{

1977, E. Allen and A. Crawford, eds., Ann Arbor Science Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan (1977).

i l

t

,(v) THOMAS E. BALDWIN 4 Publications: Technical Reports Nagle, J. and R. Whitfield, Indian Point Nuclear Power Station: Verification Analysis of County Radiological Emergency Response Plans, Argonne National Report, ANL/EES-TM-228 (May 1983). T.E. Baldwin was responsible for the management and technical review of this report.

Baldwin, T.E., et al., Economic and Demographic issues Related to Deployment of the Satellite Power System, ANL/EES-TM-23 (October 1978).

Baldwin, T.E. and Roberta Poetsch, An Approach to Assessing Local Sociocultural Impacts Using Projections of Population Growth and Composition, ANL/EES-TM-24 (August 1977).

Baldwin, T.E., et al., A Framework for Detailed Site-Specific Studies of Local Socioeconomic Impacts from Energy Development, ANL/EES-TM-8 (December 1976).

Baldwin, T.E., A Socioeconomic Assessment of Energy Development in a Small Rural County: Coal Gasification in Mercer County, North Dakota, ANL/AA-5 (August 1976).

~

Baldwin T.E., et al., Allocating Projected Emissions to Subcounty Areas, Vol.13 of Guidelines for Air Quality Maintenance Planning and Analysis: U.S. EPA Report EPA-450-4-74-014 (November 1974).

Kennedy, A.S., et al., Air Pollution / Land Use Planning Project: Phase 11 Final Report, Vol.1-3, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-450/3-74-028 A, B, C (May 1974).

Norco, J.E., R.R. Cirillo, T.E. Baldwin, and J.W. Gudenas, An Air Pollution impact Methodology for Airports and Attendant Land Use, ANL/ES-22 (January 1973).

Publications: Conference Papers (speaker's name is underlined)

Baldwin, T.E., Commercial Nuclear Power: Emergency Plans, the Regulators and the Public, paper presented to the New York Chapter of the American Institute of Chemists (September 18, 1985). ,

Stenehjem, E.J., T.E. Baldwin, and J.E. Metzger, Local Socioeconomic Impacts of Coal Development in the Midwest, Paper 12.2, Proc. 5th National Conference on Energy and the Environment, Cincinnati (October 1977).

{ Baldwin T.E., J.C. Bosch, Jr., and R.R. Cirillo, Projecting Regional Air Pollution Using Traditional Planning Variables, Proceedings of the APCA Specialty Conference: " Long-Term Maintenance of Clean Air Standards"(February 3,1975).

- - < - - - -n , - - ~ - - - - - - . ,.,..--,a,, ,,r ,_e-,- - , . . , - - _ _ - , - . - . ,n- , . . - - .

---

.----.-...---,,--,n . . _ . - --

n THOMAS E. BALDWIN 5 (V)

Publications: Conference Papers (speaker's name is underlined) (Cont'd)

Baldwin, T.E., Objectives and Decisions: How Do We Draw the Lines?, Paper presented at the Regional Seminar on Land Use issues sponsored by the Bi-State Metropolitan Commission, Geneseo, Illinois (January 15, 1975).

Baldwin, T.E., Community Structure and the Adaptation of Municipal Finance, paper presented at VIII World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Toronto, Ontario (August 26,1974).

Kennedy, A.S. and T.E. Baldwin, The Feasibility of Predicting Point Source Emissions Using Industrial Land Use Variables: A Path Analysis, Paper 74-145, Proc. 67th Annual Air Pollution Control Association Meeting, Denver (June 1974).

Kennedy, A.S., and T.E. Baldwin, Clean Air Through Urban and Regional Planning, Proceedings of the Third International Clean Air Congress, Dusseldorff, Germany (October 1973).

Croke, K.G., A.S. Kennedy, and T.E. Baldwin, Research Problems and Issues in the Application of Land Use Controls to Environmental Protection, Proc. Interagency Cong.

Q on the Environment, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, U.S. AEC Report CONF-721002, pp.153-157.

Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) , ,

Baldwin, T.E., E. Tanzman, A. Smith, W. Gasper, P. Becherman, K. Lerner, Post Exercise l Assessment, February 13, 1986, Exercise of the Local Offsite Radiological Emergency l Response Plan, LlLCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station at Shoreham, New York, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !! (Draft; March 7, 1986).

Gasper, W., T.E. Baldwin, A. Smith, Post Exercise Assessment, November 13, 1985, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York l and Oswego County for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's Nine Mile Point Nuclear l

Power Station at Seriba, Oswego County, New York, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !! (Draf t; January 10, 1985).

Gasper, W., T.E. Baldwin, Y. Klein, A. Smith, Post Exercise Assessmertt, September 26, 1985, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York, Monroe County and Wayne County for the Robert E. Ginna Nuclear Power Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11 (December 16, 1985).

J

i THOMAS E BALDWIN 6 Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) (Cont'd)

Baldwin,~ T.E., G. Kaszynski, F. Kay, Post Exercise Assessment June 5,1985. Exercise of

the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Ocean County

, and Ocean County Municipalities for ths Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(August 22,1985).

e Rospenda R., T.E. Baldwin, Post Exercise Assessment, April 23,1985, Remedial Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans for the State of New Jersey, Salem  !

County and Six Locall'fes t for Public Service Electric and Gas Company's Salem Nuclear Generating Station Hancocks Bridge, Salem County, New Jersey, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(June 19, 1985). '

l Baldwin, T.E., Review of the Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan for i

the Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant, revision dated October 1984, Federal l

Emergency Management Agency, Region I(June 18, 1985).

l Baldwin, T.E., A. Smith, Post Exercise Assessment, April 10,1985, Remedial Exercise of ,

the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of New York State and Westchester, i Rockland, Orange and Putnam Counties for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (May 10, 1985). .

Baldwin, T.E., Review of the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan for i the Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant, revision dated December 1984, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (March 26,1985).

Baldwin, T.E., P. Becherman, S. Curtis, W. Gasper, R. Rospenda, Post Exercise

! Assessment, November 28, 1984, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of New York State and Westchester, Rockland, Orange and Putnam Counties for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (February 27,1985). .

Rospenda, R., T.E. Baldwin, S. Curtis, Post Exercise Assessment, October 23,.1984, l

Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, l Salem County and Six Localities, and Cumberland County and Two Localities for Public Service Electric and Gas Company's Salem Nuclear Generating Station: Hancocks Bridge, Salem County, New Jersey; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (February

, 19, 1985).

l l-Baldwin, T.E., Review and Analysis of Population Estimates for the Boothbay Harbor Region, Maine for the Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, Wiscasset. Maine; Federal

, Emergency Management Agency Region I (January 7,1985).

Baldwin, T.E., Review of the LILCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power l

Station, Rev. I; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11 (September 7,1984).

I

. . ~ - - - . - . _ _ - . - . - - . - . - - . _ - , . . - - . _ . . , - - _ _ _ _ _ .= --_- -, - ,-. -

e N

THOMAS E. BALDWIN 7 Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) (Cont'd)

Levenson, J., A. Smith, S. Curtis, and Y. Klein, Post Exercise Assessment October 26,

1983. Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Salem County and Six Localities, and Cumberland County and Two Localities for

. Public Service Electric and Gas Company's Salem Nuclear Generating Station near Penns Grove, Salem County, New Jersey; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11 (February 6,1984).

Smith, A., T.E. Baldwin, J. Levenson, and J. Opelka, Post Exercise Assessment, September 28, 1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York and Oswego County for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's Nine Mlle Point Nuclear Station at Scriba, Oswego County, New York; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !!, (December 23, 1983).

Baldwin, T.E., Review of the LILCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Rev. 4, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (November 4,1983).

South, A., Y. Klein, T.E. Baldwin, and P. Becherman, Post Exercise Assessment, August 24-25, 1983, Exercise of the State of New York Radiological Emergency Response Interim Plan for implementing Compensating Measures for Rockland County for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region'll (September 26, 1983).

Klein, Y., A. Smith, T.E. Baldwin, and J. Tatar, Post Exercise Assessment, May 24,1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, 1

Ocean County and Ocean County Municipalities for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating i

Station: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(September 16,1983).

Klein, Y. and T.E. Baldwin, Post Drill Assessment, August 23,1983, Federal Emergency Management Agency Observed Drill of the Westchester County Bus Evacuation Procedures for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management l Agency, Region II (September 15, 1983).

Smith, A., T.E. Baldwin, and Y. Klein, Post Exercise Assessment, June 22,1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York, Monroe County, and Wayne County for the Robert E. Ginna Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(August 30 and October 12, 1983).

Klein, Y. and T.E. Baldwin, Post Exercise Assessment, May 24, 1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Ocean County and Ocean County Municipalities for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Federal

) Emergency Management Agency, Region II (August 5.1983).

d l

w THOMAS E. BALDWIN 8 Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) (Cont'd)

Baldwin, T.E., Y. Kleir:, et al., Post Exercise Assessment, March 9,1983 Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of New York State and Westchester, Rockland, Orange and Putnam Counties for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(April 14, 1983).

Barisas, S., K. Lerner, C. Saricks, T. Baldwin, J. Opelka, D. Hulet, Review of the Orange, Putnam and Westchester County, New York Radiological Emergency Response Plans for

'the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !! (April 6,1983).

Opelka, J., D. Poyer, and E. Levine, T. Baldwin, Post Exercise Assessment, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the States of New Jersey and Delaware and County and Local Jurisdictions Affected by the Salem Nuclear Generating Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(February 28,1983).

Baldwin, T.E., and G. Kaszynski, interim Findings, Joint State and Local Radiological Emergency Response Capabilities for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Vernon, Vermont; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (September 27, 1982).

' Baldwin, T.E., and G. Kaszynski, Final Exercise Report, February 18, 1982 Joint State and Local Radiological Emergency Response Exercise for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Vernon, Vermont; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (August 23, 1982).

Baldwin, T.E., and G. Kaszynski, Final Exercise Report,- February 6,1982, Joint State and Local Radiological Emergency Response Exercise for the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Station, Haddam Neck, Connecticut; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (August 1982).

Baldwin, T.E., Review of the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I(June 1982).

Baldwin, T.E., Review of the Vermont Radiological Emergency Response Plan; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I(June 1982).

Baldwin, T.E., Outlook for Engineering Services in the Oil and Gas Market; Dravo Van Houten, Consulting Engineers (June 1981).

Baldwin, T.E., A Qualitative Assessment of Economic Change in Queens County, New York; Citibank, N.A. (March 1981).

THOMAS E. BALDWIN g Legal Testimony Testimony before the U.S. Nuclear Regulato y Commission, Atomic Safety and 3 Licensing Board in the Matter of Emergency Planning of Long Island Lighting Company for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Docket No.

50-322-O L-3. Preparation of written testimony April 17, 1984 and August 7, 1984; Depositions June 29, and August 9,1984; Oral cross examination July 10-13 and August 14-16, 1984.

[

l i

1 .

l l

l

{

-. _ - _ _ _ . . _ _.___ _ ._~ _ --_ - . _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ . . - . . . . . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

s JOSEPH H. RELIZR PICFESSIQUI OUALIFICATIGIS Educaticn:

Bachelor of Science in Qissaistry, Washington College, Chastartown, MD,1956.

Master of Science in Inorganic Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA,1958.

Graduate Assistant in Channistry, Pennsylvania State University,-

University Park, PA, 1958-61.

i Professional Positions: 1961-1966 Assistant Profemece of Chemistry at Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID. Responsibilities included h=+bxy courses in freshman h4=try, ?=mtive analysis, instrumental analysis, advanced is wdc chemistry and laimatsy r=iih4=try.

8/66 - 10/73 Engloyed at the Idaho National Engineering Iaboratory in Idaho Falls, ID (then called the Naticzial Reactor Testing Station).

ma sita is goverranent owned and administered by the Daph.i.u-aat of Energy Researds and Develepannt Agency. I was employed by one of the operating ocntractors, initially Idaho Nuclear Corp.

followed by Allied Cbanieml corp. My position was a technical ans in the researt:h and devolepnent area of fissicut product behavice and y,.gdes.

10/73 - 6/74 Euployed as researds scientist by Nuclear Envisu_abal Services division of SAI, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID. responsibilities included cxmtract suppcet on performance gn=ama rad wasta prma==ing equipment in a IMR and analysis of sources of inplant radiatica avre=n3 to werkers.

6/74 - 12/78 Enployed as scientific and engineering supervisor by Allied Chemical Cmmaticm at the Idaho National Engineering Iaboratory. Respcrisibilities included supervision of a research laboratory involved with analysis of fission product levels in irradiated ruclear fuel vi-is and analysis of the fission product ccmtant of sanples of the worlds lat known natural fissica reacter and the supervisicm of an analysis laboratory for envitu_R.al sangles. Otziducted ccmtract raaaarch in support of NRC.

l l

I l

12/78 - present Engloyed as scientist by Allied Chemical Corp., Exxon Nuclear

. Idaho co., Inc., (after 7/3/79), arxi W'=_ Idaho Nuclear _

ocupany, Inc. (after 3/1/84), at the Idaho Naticnal Engineering Iatmatory. Respcosibilities include research and develwt

. v Lact support to NRC and FM.

Attended FM orientatics training course at Radiolegir al {

E= upcf Preparedness PlanninJ for DOE Ccmtract Personnel.

Experience:

1 Prove existance of previously wagdzed afit us radiciodine l l

species to be hypoiadous acid.

Developed m1itig device to differentiate various chemical forms of mi;t- ze radiciodina.

Developed irmede adarwherit to retain niit- us radioiadine.

l Measured < jamar = fissicn perdvt= in effluents and pm i stremes in 5 BNR's staticos.

I Perfermed effluent and envirersnental maannunents to ==amaa l indira -p_ - r rille dose pattamty at ENR's.

( Mada effluent and enviri:rnmental measurements of radinindivia at a pha-*4 cal plant to assess envircrunantal 4W.

Analyzed fuel apar imaris to de r amine accurately the fission' y4alde in the fast flux regicn of the neutri:n ap iu.im.

l Analyzed fuel aper imaris to establish breeding or omtversion ratio in 'Ih-U fuels frcst the light water breeder program.

Developed a m1itxJ device for ai;t_us 14 C and 3H in nuclear plant affluents and process streams.

I l Participated in envirannantal program to measure movement of l radicrav1id== through process equipnent in PWR's so that the predictive andala can be evaluated.

! Respcosible for technical evaluatial of ev=mnair.ial BNR off-gas

- systems.

l Evaluated applicability of off-sita, real-time instrumentation to l deemenine the magnitude of unmcmitated releases in acr idarit situations.

I i

_ _ - - - . ~ _ _ _ _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ .

Evaluated soil to vegetation transfer of stable cesium arxi stremtium.

Reviewed current state of knowledge m scavengirxy in the '

envirmment min me radiciodina by rain or snow.

Testified as FDR witness at Indian Point and Shoreham ASIB hearing.

Adjunct facility member at FDR Z- psy IG - 4t. Institute.

Publications:

J. H. Faller, F. A. Duca, and F. O. Cartan, " Retention of Iodine cm Selected Partirmlata Filters and a Percus Silver Membrana Being Otmsidsted for the IDFT Maypeck", IN-1078, May 1967 W. J. Masck, D. T. Pence, and J. H. Keller, "A Highly Efficient II u.yunic Adarn4w for Airborne Iodine spaci= (Silver Zeolite)

Development Studies", IN-1224 October 1968 R. L. Nebeker, J. H. Keller, L. T. Lakey, D. E. Black, W. P. Palirm, and R. E. Sdlindler, "Otmtaiment Behavior of Xanen

, and Icdine Uhdar Sina21ated Ices-of-Coolant Jeriderit Otmditions in the CtataminationhiMal W=rit", IN-1394, M2na 1971 B. Weiss, P. G. Voilleque, J. H. Keller, B. Kahn, H. L. gger, A. Martin, and C. R. Willi = , " Detailed Measurements of I in Air, Vegetaticm, and Milk Around 'Ihree Operating Reactor Sitas", NU1EG-75/021, Mards 1975 W. J. Masck, F. W. Spraktes, R. L. Trcap, and J. H. Keller,

" Analytical Results, Pae==='ided Nuclear Otmstants and Suggested Carrelations for the Evaluation of CEIO Fission Product Data", at IAEA Inta.Tstimial Symposium en the Oklo Phencanenan, Liberville, Gabon, IAEA-SM-204/2, Juna 1975 W. J. Masck, W. A. Emel, L. L. Dickarsen, J. E. nelm me, and R. L. Trtsp, " Dim.m.-cies and J. H. Keller, E. A.g,'Ibaruni Regarding Pu Fissicn Yields and the Use of as a Burnap Monitor", ICP-1092, narumhm, 1975 N. D. Dyer, E. B. Neischmidt, J. H. Keller, and B. G. Motes,

" Procedures Souram Term Measurement P h am", 'IREE-1178, M M 1977 N. D. Dyer, J. H. Kaller, R. L. Bunting, B. G. Notes, S. T. Crtmey, D. W. Akers, C. V. Mr-Tanac, T. E. Ctzc, R. L. Rynasten, S. W. Dum, D. R. Underwood, J. W. 'Ikadlyk, "In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Ft. I'm1 M_wl _

Station-Unit 1", NUREG/CR-1040, July 1978 1

1

_ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ l

T J. L. W-- , -;i, S. W. Duca, ani J. H. IGaller, "An AN--rSaric Tritium arxi Cadxm-14 Manitoring System", NUREG/CR-0386, September 1978 N. C. Dyer, J. H.1Galler, R. L. Bunting, B. G. Notes, S. T. Ccmay, D. W. Akers, C. V. Mr Taae, T. E. Cox, R. L.19 RTE tui, S. W. Duca, D. R. Uhderwood, J. W. Tkachyk, "In-Plant Souren Term Measurements at Zicn Statica",

NURS3/CR-0715, February 1979 J. J.1Galler, L. W. McClure, M. Hoza, A. L. Ayers Jr. , R. I.o, and L. W. Barrett, " Boiling Water Reactor Off-gas Systems Evaluatica", NUREG/CR-0727, June 1979 R. W. Benedict, A. B. Christensen, J. A. Dal Debbio, J. H. IGaller, and D. A. Ehectit, " Tar *mPal and Eudaic Feasibility of Zeolite Ei- e[ =$1atica for ICcyptcm-85 Stu..p", DTICO-10ll, Se[*amhar 1979 J. H. 1Galler, B. G. Motes, D. W. Akers, T. E. CcK, S. W. Duce, and J. W. Tkachyk, " Measurement of Xa-131, C-14 and Tritium in Air and I-131 Vegetatica and Milk Around the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station", NUREG/CR-1195, ENICD-1023, Mardt 1980 J. W. Mandler, S. T. Croney, N. C. Dyer, C. V. Mr Tamar ,

A. C. Stalker, B. G. Notes, J. H.1Galler, T. E. Ocac, D. W. Akers, J. W. Tkachyk, and S. W. Duca, "In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Turkey Point Station - Units 3 and 4", NUREG/CR-1629, W W 1980 l'

P. G. Voilleque, B. Kahn, H. L. Kreiger, D. M. MafM, J. H. 1Galler, and B. H. Weiss, g uatlan of the

Air-Vegetaticm-Milk Pathway for I at the Quad Cities Nuclear l Power Station", NURS3/CR-1600, November 1981 l

W. J. Maeck, L. G. Hoffman, B. A. Staples, and J. H. IGaller, "An

! Assessment of Offsite, Real-Tina Does Measurement Systems for Emergency Situations", NUREG/CR-2644,1lNICD-ll10, April 1982 L. G. Hoffman and J. H.1Galler, "Characterizatics of Soil to Plant Transfer coefficients for Stable Qasium and SL.mtium",

NUREG/CR-2495, DiICD-1105, June 1982 i P. G. Voilleque, L. G. Hoffman, and J. H.1Galler, "Wat Deposition i

Prr-maa for Radiciodines", NUREG/CR-2438, ENICD-1111, l August 1982 I

B. J. h1mrviscm, L. G. Hoffman, R. J. Henkus, and J. H. Kaller,

" Guidance cm Offsite Emm.psy Radiation Measurement Systems -

Ihase 2 - Milk Pathway", WINCD-1009, April 1984

a. . - - . - - - -

A W. J. Maeck, R. J. Hmkus, J. H. Kaller, and P. G. Voilleque,

, "Iaboratory Measurements of Parameters affectirq Wet Deposition of Methyl Iodide", NURBG/CR-4041, WINO >-1023, Sagtembar 1984

~

B. J. Salmenson, L. G. Hoffman, R. J. Mcnkus, and J. H. Kaller, "Guidanos cn Offsite Ei pcf Radiatica Measurement Systems -

Phase 3 - Water and Non-Dairy Food Pathway", WINCO-1012, October 1984 B. J. Salacmacm, R. J. Hmkus, and J. H. Kaller, " Guidance ot)

Offsite Emergency Radiation Measurement Systems - 1hase 1 -

Ai h e Release", FDOL-REP-2 (Rev.1), WINQF1029, nar=har 1985 Papers:

F. O. Cartan, H. R. Beard, F. A. Duce, and J. H. Kaller, " Evidence for the Existence of Hypoldous Acid as a Volatile Iodina Species Preh in Water Air Mixtures at Tenth AEC Air Cleanirrr Conference, New York, NY, August 1968, CC2tF 680821 J. H. Kaller, F. A. Duce, D. T. Pence, and W. J. Masck, "Hypoidcus Acid: An Ai h e Ir p dc Iodina Species in Steam-Air Mixtures

, at Eleventh AEC Air Cleanirxr Conference, Richland, MA, Segfamber 1970, CC2iF 700816 l

J. H. Keller, F. A. Duce, and W. J. Masck, "A Selective Adsorbent l W14ticJ for Differentiatirq AM -4e Icdina apari== at Eleventh AEC Air Cleanim Conference. Rid 11and, MA, T-har 1970, CC21F 700816 J. H. Kaller, T. R. 'Ihcsias, D. T. Pence, and W. J. Maeck, "An Evaluaticn of Materials and Techniques Used for Mcrtitorirg Air-Borne Radioiodina Species at '1W11th AEC Air c'1anelirrr Calference, Oak Ridge, 'IN, August 1972, CC21F 720823 J. H. Kaller, T. R. 'Ihemas, D. T. Ponce, W. J. Maeck, " Iodine Chemistry in Steam Air A+==rhares at'Fifth Anrmal Ha=1th Phymir'n Societv_ Midyear Syngesium, Idaho Falls, ID, November 1970 J. H. Kaller, L. L. Dickerscm, F. W. Spartions, arxi W. J. Maeck, DePat9miilatial of the Natural Abundance of Kryptcri in the Ah--f E. at Am. d==. Soc. laelnae d==4atry and Technoloav Division Meetim, Newport Bendi, CA, February 1973 J. H. Kaller, "Iodina Species Measurements", invited paper at I Nuclear Safety Analysis Center E.u.kaimac cn Iodine Releases in Reactor Accidents, Palo Alto, CA, Novemhat- 1980 gI .GVoilleque arx1 J. H. Kaller, " Air-to-Vegetaticm Transport of I as Hypoiadous Acid", Health M1ysics 40, p 91-94, 1981 l

l

f J. H. Faller and L. G. Hoffman, "FsW Federal Guidance cm h p .y Mcnitoring in the Milk Pathway", at 13th Annual National Conference en Radiaticn Ocntrol, Little Rock, AK, May 1981 J. H. Faller, "Updata cn Radioicdine Manitoring", at the 14th Annual Naticnal Ccnference at Radiaticn Ocntrol, Portland, MA, May 1982 J. H. Faller, " Iodine W irq Under Emergency Ocx1ditions",

invited paper at IEEE Nuclear Science Sygosium, Orlando, FL, November 1984 e

00CKETED RC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v/ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

• B7. APR 14 P3 :53 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

. ObkIIYi sieiYrkl$

0 In the Matter of )

) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3

• )

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )

Unit 1) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " FEMA PREFILED TESTIMONY" in the above-captioned proceedings have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this 10th day of April, 1987:

John H. Frye, III, (Courtesy Copy) Fabian G. Palomino, Esq.

Administrative Judge Special Counsel to the Governor O Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Executive Chamber State Capitol (j U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, NY- 12224 Oscar H. Paris (Courtesy Copy) H. Taylor Reveley III, Esq.

Administrative Judge Hunton & Williams Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 707 East Main Street ,

U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 1535 Washington, D.C. 20555 Richmond, VA 23212 Frederick J. Shon Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq.

Administrative Judge New York State Department of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Public Service U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Three Empire State Plaza Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, NY 12223 O

[\~/_)

Morton B. Margulies, Chairman '

Dr. Jerry R. Kline Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East-West Towers, Rm. 430 East-West Towers, Rm. 430 4350 East-West Hwy. 4350 East-West Hwy Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Bethesda, MD 20814 Stephen B. Latham, Esq.

John F. Shea, III, Esq. Christopher M. McMurray, Esq.

• Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.

Twomey, Latham & Shea Attorneys at Law David T. Case, Esq.

P.O. Box 398 Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 33 West Second Street 1800 M Street, N.W.

Riverhead, NY 11901 9th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Joel Blun, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director, Utility Intervention Washington, D.C. 20555 NY State Consumer Protection Board Suite 1020 Atomic Safety and Licensing 99 Washington Avenue Appeal Board Panel Albany, NY 12210 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Monroe Schneider North Shore Committee T P.O. Box 231 s_,) Docketing and Service Section Wading River, NY 11792 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Philip H. McIntire Washington, D.C. 20555 Federal Emergency Management Agency 26 Federal Plaza Spence Perry, Esq.** New York, New York 10278 General. Counsel, Rm. 840 Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20472 Robert Abrams, Esq.

Attorney General of the State Mary M. Gundrum, Esq.. of New York New York State Dept. of Law Attn: Peter Bienstock, Esq.

120 Broadway Department of Law 3rd Floor Room 3-116 New York, N.Y Two World Trade Center 10271 Room 46-14 New York, NY 10047 Anthony F. Earley, Jr., Esq. MHB Technical Associates General Counsel 1723 Hamilton Avenue Long Island Lighting Company Suite K 250 Old County Road San Jose, CA 95125 Mineola, NY 11501 a

-~s County Executive Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.

Suffolk County Executive Suffolk County Attorney

) County Executi.ve/ Legislative Bldg. H. Lee Dennison Building Veteran's Memorial Highway Veteran's Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Ms. Nora Bredes New York State Energy Office Shoreham Opponents Coalition Agency Building 2 195 East Main Street Empire State Plaza Smithtown, NY 11787

• Albany, New York 12223 Ellen Blackler Mr. Robert Hoffmnan New York State Assembly Ms. Susan Rosenfeld Energy Committee Ms. Sharlene Sherwin 626 Legislative Office Building P.O. Box 1355 Albany, NY 12248 Massapequa, NY 11758 Brookhaven Town Attorney Richard Bachman, Esq.

475 E. Main Street U.S Nuclear Regulatory Agency Patchogue, NY 11772 7735 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda, MD 20814 Y5 O)

(,_

William R. Cumming Federal Emergency Management Egency

/

}

O t

,, - . - , . . - . . , - - - - . ., --- - . - -- . . - . - ------ - - - - - - . . , - - . -