ML20203K496

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Insp Repts 50-259/73-03 & 50-259/73-07 Contain No Proprietary Info,Per s
ML20203K496
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Browns Ferry
Issue date: 08/03/1973
From: Gilleland J
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: Moseley N
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML082390329 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-782 NUDOCS 8604300402
Download: ML20203K496 (2)


Text

-

- u ;- _ _ _ -. -

m.

wav A

m __.

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY F98R ' /r CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 6

R-37401 6

/7 August 3, 1973 gggggsgg PA ATN E A S Hip Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Directorate of Regulatory Operations U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Region II - Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, NW.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. Moseley:

This is in response to your July 16 letters, RO:II:WSL 50-259/73-3, and P.0:II:WSL 50-259/73-7, ubich transmitted for our review DRO Inspection Reports (same numbers). We have reviewed these reports and do not consider any part of them to be proprietary.

V w-truly yours,

?

WCf J. E. G111 eland Assistant to the Manager of Power i

l CC: Mr. R. B. Beers T7A Project I

General Electric Company Atomic Power Equipment Department San Jose, California 95125 l

86043'00402 860317 hRO

.-782 PDR J

I

-.--..._.-._-_.m._,._....a.

4 Form 11-1 (11/72) t Jnspection Rc' port Distr ibution Designation f

' ~ Licensec -7//M-[m ' M/

Report No.)N/73,f

(

f L

/

Dispatch of Report (Standard Distribution Ye So) 1.

Enforec rent response case (Form II-2) 2.

Uo enforec. cent response case (Form II-3) 3.

RO:HQ for Action case (Form II-4) 1;nitial Mailing of Letter (Standard Dictribution Yes Mo)

/

(Form II-2) 1.

Eb.forcement response case 2.

No enforcement response case (Form 11-3)

Licensac Response to Enforecracnt (Standard Distribution Yes No) a rkh 1.

Acceptable (Form II-2)

{m g[./7/;N71.

2.

Not Acceptable (Form II-2)

Licensco Respour.c to Proprietary Inforr.ation

_ Form II-13) M

(

1.

Nona designated

_ Form II-12)

(

2.

Designated c.

Accepted by Region b.

Rejected by Ret; ion (1) HQ occepts Regional posit, ion (2) IIQ disagrees with Region % position Distribution other.than standard dia:. 'bution (state why)-

~

Is this case in hearing notice stage?" Yes do

.I

\\

V yAI 5

.