ML20203K496
Text
-
- u ;- _ _ _ -. -
m.
wav A
m __.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY F98R ' /r CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 6
R-37401 6
/7 August 3, 1973 gggggsgg PA ATN E A S Hip Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Directorate of Regulatory Operations U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Region II - Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, NW.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. Moseley:
This is in response to your July 16 letters, RO:II:WSL 50-259/73-3, and P.0:II:WSL 50-259/73-7, ubich transmitted for our review DRO Inspection Reports (same numbers). We have reviewed these reports and do not consider any part of them to be proprietary.
V w-truly yours,
?
WCf J. E. G111 eland Assistant to the Manager of Power i
l CC: Mr. R. B. Beers T7A Project I
General Electric Company Atomic Power Equipment Department San Jose, California 95125 l
86043'00402 860317 hRO
.-782 PDR J
I
-.--..._.-._-_.m._,._....a.
4 Form 11-1 (11/72) t Jnspection Rc' port Distr ibution Designation f
' ~ Licensec -7//M-[m ' M/
Report No.)N/73,f
(
f L
/
Dispatch of Report (Standard Distribution Ye So) 1.
Enforec rent response case (Form II-2) 2.
Uo enforec. cent response case (Form II-3) 3.
RO:HQ for Action case (Form II-4) 1;nitial Mailing of Letter (Standard Dictribution Yes Mo)
/
(Form II-2) 1.
Eb.forcement response case 2.
No enforcement response case (Form 11-3)
Licensac Response to Enforecracnt (Standard Distribution Yes No) a rkh 1.
Acceptable (Form II-2)
{m g[./7/;N71.
2.
Not Acceptable (Form II-2)
Licensco Respour.c to Proprietary Inforr.ation
_ Form II-13) M
(
1.
Nona designated
_ Form II-12)
(
2.
Designated c.
Accepted by Region b.
Rejected by Ret; ion (1) HQ occepts Regional posit, ion (2) IIQ disagrees with Region % position Distribution other.than standard dia:. 'bution (state why)-
~
Is this case in hearing notice stage?" Yes do
.I
\\
V yAI 5
.