ML20203J842
Text
-
TENNESPEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHA i ANDOGA, TENNESSEE 3 7 4 0'I40 December 5, 1973 en'ygg,gg i
AARTNE AS Hip Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Directorate of Regulatory Operations U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Region II - Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, NW.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. Moseley:
This is in response to Directorate of Regulatory Operations letter R0:II:WSL 50-259/73-14 dated November 14, 1973.
Following are a quotation from Summary of Findings of R0 Report No. 50-259/73-14 i
and our response.
a.
Contrary to paragraph 6.3.A.9. of the Technical Specifications, TVA did not adhere to BF-ISI-1,
" Access Control," in that the public safety Officer left the gatehouse with the doors unlocked.
Compliance with paragraph 6.3.A.9 and BF-ISI-1, " Access Control,"
J was immediately achieved on October 19, 1973, when the violation was made known by the Regulatory Inspector. On November 20, 1973, a second Public Safety Officer was assigned to the 7 a.m. - 3 p.m.
shif t at the gatehouse Monday through Friday to assist in the admittance control procedure during heavy traffic through the gate-house and vehicular gate. This ensures that a Public Safety Officer is in the Ratehouse at all times during these hours until the perma-nent electrically operated vehicular gate that can be operated f$pm the gatehouse is installed. On other shifts when it is necessary~for the Public Safety Officer to leave the gatehouse, procedures require the gatehouse to be locked and persons awaiting admittance or exit authorization shall not be permitted to remain in the gatehouse during his absence.
.3 RO Inspection Report No. 50-259/73-14 contains no proprietary matgplal.
O Ve y truly,yours,
((Ya p
J. E. Gilleland
}/
Assistant to the Manager of Power 8604300265 860317 g
hRO
-782 PDR
/
//
I l
I f
Form II-1 (11/72) i n
l Inspection Report I
Distr ibutien Designa.lon
/
- ~ Licensee I / d
.c7< wo hcun / Report No. Th-159/73 '/
t g-
/
Dispat.ch of Report (Standard Distribution Yes No) 1.
Enforcerent response case (Form II-2)
^
2.
Uo enforcerent response case (Fora II-3) 3.
RO:HQ for Actica case (Form II-4)
Initial 1alling of Letter (Standard Dictribution Yes No) 1.
Enforcer. cat response case V
(Form II-2) 2.
No enforceeant response case (Forn II-3)
Licencae Response to Enforec::, cat (Standard Distribution Yes No) 1.
Acceptabic l/
(Forn II-2) 2.
Not *:ceptable
~
(Fore. II-2)
Liccar.ca Res;'on.c to l'cc,irictnry Inforr.2:171
[
f 1
(form II-13) 1.
None desigaated j
2.
Der; Q;n.u.ed
(
_ _ Form II-12 c.
Accepted by Re.qfen b.
Rej ect ed by Ret; ion (1) HQ accepts Regional posit, ion (2) !!Q disar.rees uith Region';' position Distribution other then stcndard distributica (state why)
~.
Is this case in hearing, notice stand?" Yes No 4
r lo(
..