ML20203J081

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Telegram AO Rept BFAO-7314T:on 730919,test Data on Target Relief Valves Did Not Indicate That All Valves within Specified Limiting Safety Sys Settings
ML20203J081
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Browns Ferry
Issue date: 09/19/1973
From: Green H
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML082390329 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-782 BFAO-7314T, NUDOCS 8604300101
Download: ML20203J081 (2)


Text

_-_

s l

I l

Alegram

' E.EJ E E fl tuestern union a

w 404P EST SEP 19 73 AB140 AAD203(1504)(2-164248E262)PD 09/19/73 1504 Ib 1

~

ICS IPIONGZ CSP 2057298316 TD8N ATHENS AL 42 09-19 0304P EST PMS US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIGN, WUX REGION II DIRECT 0RETTE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS 230. PEACM TRE ST N0JtTHWEST 8 // / 8 7 4 /

ATLAW4 GA 30303 SUBJEC,f t BFA0-7314T TEST DATA 05 TARGET ROCK RELIEF VALVES INSTALLED ON UNIT ONE AT BROWNS VERRY NUCLEAR PLANT DOES NOT APPEAR TO SUBSTANTIATE THAT ALL VALVES ARE WITHIN SPECIFIED LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS THE W ACTER IS IN A COLD SHUT DOWN CONDITION H J GREEN BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT h J2.o fxn,.-

A

/."s'q;s

+=a g-cjff

ggy,
  • H 8604300101 860317 RO

-782 PDR

W,x -[

m g*

ye-~

Form II-1A(4/7'3)...evision 1 Inquiry Report Distribution -Designation

/

Report No. [8'o2 3~f Licensee Y Y N b, w t M A h G

Type of Case (Standard Distril. tion Ye}$ No) 1.

No Inquiry Report written - licensee report constitutes total documentation 4-(Form II-5) 2.

Inquiry Report written - }31 licensee written report expected (Form II-6) 3.

Inquiry Report written - licensee written report is expected (Form II-7) 4.

RO:HQ for action case (Form II-8)

Inquiry Report is to be attached to inspection report.

Yes No Routine distribution of Inquiry Report to licensee for designation of proprietary information.

Yes No Licensee Response to Proprietary Information 1.

None designated (Form II-13).

2.

Designated (Form II-12)l a.

Accepted by Region b.

Rejected by Region (1) HQ accepts Regional position I

(2) HQ disagrees with Regional position P

Distribution other than standard distribution (state why)

L Is this case in hearing notice stage?

Yes No

,. _.,. _