ML20203J697

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Administrative Controls for Normal Working Hours of Plant Staff Who Perform Safety Related Functions
ML20203J697
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/12/1997
From:
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20203J657 List:
References
NUDOCS 9712220042
Download: ML20203J697 (17)


Text

, - . . . . -.- . - . .

Attachment I to JPN 97 038

~ REVISED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES Proposed Changes To The Technical Specifications Regarding Administrative Controls For Normai Workina Hours And Associated Channes I

9712220042 971212 PDR ADOCK 05000333 P PDR New York Power Authority

' JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No. 50-333 DPR 59

I, JAFNPP

~

3.5 (cor.t'd) 4.5 (cont'd)

F. ECCS-Cold Condition F. ECCS-Cold Condition

1. A mini lum of two low pressure Emergency Cora Surveillance of the low pressure ECCS systems required by Cooling subsystems shall be operable whenever 3.5.F.1 and 3.5.F.2 shall be as follows:

irradiated fuel is in the reactor, the reactor is in the cold condit'on, and work is being performed with 1. Perform a flowrate test at least once every 3 months the potentia! for draining the reactor vessel. on the required Core Spray pump (s) and/or the RHR :

pump (s). Each Core Spray pump shall delivr.er at least

2. A minimum of one low pressure Emergency Core 4,265 gpm against a system head entresponding to a Cooling subsystem shall be operable whenever reactor vessel pressure greater than or equal to 113 irradiated fuel is in the reactor, the reactor is in the psi above primary containment pressure. Each RHR cold condition, and no work is being performed pump shall deliver at feest 8910 gpm against a with the potential for draining the reactor vemi. system head corresponding to a reactcr vessel to primary containment differentia: pressure of 2 20
3. Emergency Core Cooling subsystems are not psid.

required to be operable provided that the reactor vessel head is re:noved, the cavity is flooded, the 2. Perform a monthly operability test on the required spent fuel pool gates are removed, and the water Core Spray and/or LPCI motor operated valves.

level cbove the fuel is in accordance with ..

Specification 3.10.C. 3. Once per 8 bours verify the suppression pool water l level is greater than or equal to 10.33 ft. whenever

4. With the requirements of 3.5.F.1, 3.5.F.2, or the low pressure ECCS subsystems are aligned to the 3.5.F.:' not satisfied, suspend core alterations and suppression pool.

all operations with the potential for draining the reactor vessel. Restore at least one system to 4. Once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> verify a minimum of 324 inches of l operable status within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or establish water is available in the Condensate Storage Tanks Secondary Containment Integrity within the next 8 (CST) whenever the Core Spray System (s) is a!igned hours. to the tanks.

Amendment No. 4,104,100,174,204, 122

-JAFNPP e

4.5 BASES (cont'd) .

the line is in a full condition. Between the monthly intervals at which the lines are vented, instrumentation has been provided in the Core Spray System and LPCI System to monitor the presence of water in the discharge piping. This instrumentation will be calibrated on the same frequency as the safety system instrumentation. This period of periodic testing ensures that during the interval between the monthly checks the status of the discharge piping is monitored on a continuous bases.

Normally the low pressure ECCS subsystems required by Specification 3.5.F.1 are demonstrated operable by the surveillance tests in Specifications 4.5.A.1 and 4.5.A.3.

Section 4.5.F specifies periodic surveillance tests for the low pressure ECCS subsystems which are applicable when the reactor is in the cold condition. These tests in conjunction with the requirements on filled discharge pioing (Specification 3.5.G), and the requirements on ECCS actuation instrumentation (Specification 3.2.B), assure adequate ECCS capability in the cold condition. The water level in the suppression pool, or the Condensate Storage Tanks (CST, when the suppression pool is inoperable, is checked once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> to ensure that sufficient water is available for core cooling.

Amendment No. 14,100, 133

7 JAFNPP ,

3.7 (cont'd) - 4.7 (cont'd) - >

I

6. L O'xygen Cor .:entration 6. ' Oxygen Concentration The primary containment oxygen concentration shall be- a. The primary containment oxygen concentration shat ' l
maintained less than 4.0 volume percent while in the Run be verified to be within limits once each week? ,

mode, except as specified in 3.7.A.6.a and 3.7.A.6.b Instrument surveillances shall be performed as  ;

below: specified in Table .4.2-8.

a. Primary containment oxygen concentration shall be [

less than 4.0 volume percent within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of exceeding 15% of rated thermal power during startup. [

b~. De-inerting mcy commence up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> prior to reriucing thermal power to less than 15% of rated [

before a plant shutdown.  ;

c. If oxygen concentration is greater than or equal to

, _4.0 volume percent at any time while in the Run -

mode, except as specified in 3.7.A.6.a or 3.7.A.6.b 'I above, restore oxygen concentration to less than

'4.0 volume percent within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, otherwise

} !'

reduce thermal power to less than or equal to 15%

of rated within the next 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. l

7. Drywell-Torus Differential Pressure 7. Drywell-Torus Differential Pressure L
a. Differential pressure between the drywell and torus a. The pressure dif'erential between the drywell and . ,

shall be maintained at equal to or greater than 1.7 torus sha!! be terified to be within limits once per 8 psid except as specified in (1) and (2) below: hours. Instrument surveillances shall be performed 1 as specified in Table 4.2-8. ,

11 Amendment No. DO, 101,221, 180 1 a .- ..- -. . .= . . - - - . _ _ - -

JAFNPP

-! 2'.- Ari SRO or an SRO with a licenselimited to fuel handlihg_shall directly supervise all-Core" Alterations. - This person shall havra no other duties during this time; i

3.) DELETED

]

4. In the event of illness or unexpected absence, up to two (2) hours is allowed to i restore the shift crew to the minimum complement. -3
5. The Operations Managerf Assistant Operations Manager l Shift Manager, and Control  !

Room Supervisor shall hold an S90 license and the Senior Nuclear Operator and the Nuclear Control Operator shall hold an RO license or an SRO license.

6. Administrative procedures shall be developed and implemented to limit the working  ;

i hours of unit staff who perform safety related functions;' e.g., senior reactor  !

- operators,- health physicists, auxiliary. operators, and maintenance personnel who are working on safety related systems. .

Adaquate shift coverage shall be maintained without routine heavy use of overtime.

The obje*:tive shall be to have operating personnel work a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day, nominal 40-hour week, while the plant is operating.

However, in the event that unforeseen problems require substantial amounts of overtime to be used or during extended periods of shutdown for refueling, tr.ajor  !

maintenance or major modifications, on a temporary basis, the following guidelines shall be followed:

a. An individual should not be permitted to work more than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> straight, axcluding shift turnover time.
b. An individual should not be permitted to work more than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in any-24-hour period, nor more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in any 48-hour period, nor more than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any 168 hour0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> period, all excluding shif t turnover time. l-
c. A break of at least eight hours should be allowed between work periods, shif t turnover time can be included in the breaktime.
d. Except during extended shutdown periods, the use of overtime should be l considered on an individual basis and not fr- the entire staff on a shift. 1 d

Any deviation from the above guidelines shall be authorized by the Site Executive -

. Officer or the General Manager - Operations, or higher levels of management, in L accordance with established procedures and with documentation of the basis for -

_. granting the deviation. ' Controls shall be included in the procedures such that individual overtime shall be reviewed monthly by the Site Executive Officer or his designee to-

assure that excessive hours have not been assigned.? Routine devia00n from the above Sguidelines is not authorized.

I mendment No. 40,111,100,107,170,100,210,220, 247a I

, , - . , - - , <r >

, , , . - ,- .e-

- - -- .- - - , , ~ - - +

a n - .n. n 4 - , .. ._.e x - a 4

. Attachment ll to JPN-97-038 ,

SAFETY EVALUATION Proposed Changes To The Technical Specifications Regarding

' Administrative Controls For Normal Workina Hours And Associated Chances I

h New York Power Authority JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No; 50-333 DPR-59 4

, , , y .- + --

-e

-. Attachment !! to JPN.97 038' ,

SAFETY EVALUATION - '

Page 1 of 6

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES

' This application for emendment to the James A. FitzPatrick Technical Specifications proposes to change the number of hours operating personnel can work in a normal day as defined in . Administrative Controls section 6.2.2.6.-- Administrative changes were - .

also made to Technical Specifications sections 4.5.F.3.,4.5.F.4.,4.5 EASES, 4.7.A.7.a., 6.2.2.6.b., and 6.2.2.6.c. to provide clarification without changing the intent or meaning.

Paae 122 Revise ECCS-Cold Condilipf., Surveillance Requirements section 4.5.F.3. to read "Once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />..."

Revise ECCS-Cold Condition Surveillance Requirements section 4.5.F.4, to read "Once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />..."

Paae 133 Revise section 4.5 BASES to read "The water levelin the suppression pool, or the Condensato Storage Tanks (CST) when the suppression pool is inoperable, is checked once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />..."

Paae 180 Revise CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS Surveillance Requirements section 4.7.A.7.a. to read "The pressure differential between the drywell and torus shall be verified to be within limits cace per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />."

Pane 247a Revise ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS section 6.2.2.6. to read

" Adequate shift coverage shall be maintained without routine heavy use of overtime.

. The objective shall be to have operating personnel work a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day, nominal 40-hour week while the plant is operating."

Revise ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL.S section 6.2.2.6.b. to read "...no more than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any 168 hour0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> period..."

Revise ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS section 6.2.2.6.c. to read "A break of at least eight hours should be allowed between work periods, shift turnover time can be included in the breaktime."

l s- i

.. . l Attachment 11 tn JPN 97 038 SAFETY EVALUATION Page 2 of 6

11. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES James A. FitzPatrick (JAF) Technical Specifications section 6.2.2.6. establishes the normal work hours for operating personnel as "...a normal 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day,40-hour  :

week..." The purposed change revises this section to state, "..'.a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> -

day, nominal 40-hour week..." This change would permit flexibility in shift durations .

While not altering the intent of the existing specification with respect to the number of hours that should normally be worked per week. Technical Specifications section , 6.2.2.6. will continue to provide adequate ;ontrols over the use of overtime.

lil. SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES There are no safety implications associated with the proposed changes.

?

Revisions to section 6.2.2.6.

Establishing operating personnel hours at "a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day, nominal 40-hour week" does not adversely affect performance. By_specifying a range (S so 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day) rather than a specific shift length, plant evolutions normally requiring more than 8 ,

hours can be completed without the interruption / loss of continuity created ' shift turnovers. This can result in increased productivity and effectiveness of operating personnel and personnel of other departments that require operations support.

Acceptable levels of performance of operating personnelis assured for any 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shift through effective control of shift turnovers and plant activities. Utilization of the 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shift is also consistent with the work schedules of other plants in the nuclear industry where nominal work weeks are 36 to 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> for operating personnel.

Operating personnel awareness of plant conditions is maintained. All Technical Specifications surveillances required to be performed "once each shift" will remain on 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> frequencies.

While the specific range of shifts for operating personnel has increased, the intent of this section is also to ensure excessive overtime is not utilized to complete normal >

toutine operations department tasks. The proposed change meets the intent of the section in that overtime remains controlled by site administrative procedures in accordance with the NRC Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 82-12).

Revision to section 6.2.2.6.b.

This change includes the substitution of a "7 day period" to a '168 hour0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> period", This will allow for better administrative controls of the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> limit on hours worked since operating personnel are on a rolling schedule. This is an administrative change and

.does not alter the intent or meaning of the Technical Specifications.

, Attachment il 12 JPN 97 038 SAFEYY EVALUATION Page 3 of 6

- Revision tu section 6.2.2.6.c.

This change clarifies that shif t turnover time can be included in the 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> break period required for operators between work periods. The proposed change meets the intent of the NRC Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 8212).

Revision to sections 4.5.F.3. 4.5 F.4. 4.5 BASES, and 4.7 A.7.a.

These changes include the substitution of "once per shift" to "once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />" to clarify the definition of the surveillance frequency as used in the Technical Specifications. The above referenced surveillances will remain on their required frequencies. The proposed changes are administrative in nature and meet the intent of the Technical Specificatiuns.

IV. EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.92, the enclosed applicat'. a is judged to involve no significant hazards based upon the following information:

1. Does the proposed licensing amendment involve a significant increase in the i probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?

( Response:

Establishing operating personnel work hours at "a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day, nominal 40-hour week" allows normal plant operations to be managed more effectively and does not adversely affect performance of operating personnel.

Overtime remains controlled by site administrative procedurea in accordanc.e with NRC Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 82-12). If 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shifts are maintained in part or whole, then acceptable levels of performance frotn operating personnelis assured through effective control of shift tumovers and plant activities. No physical plant modifications are involved and none of the precursors of previously evaluated accidents are affected. Therefore, this change will not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

Editorial changes clarify sections 6.2.2.6 b. and 6.2.2.6.c. without changing the intent or meaning. The proposed changes meet the intent of the NRC Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 82-12).

Changes to sections 4.5.F.3., 4.5.F.4., 4.5 Bases, and 4.7.A.7.a. do not change the intent or meaning of the Technical Specifications, do not change operating procedures, and are consistent with surveillance requirements.

l l

Attachment ll t: JPN 97 038 SAFETY EVALUATION Page 4 of 6

2. Does the proposed license amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?

Establishing operating personnel work hours at "a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day, nominal 40-hour week" allows normal plant operation to be managed more effectively and does not adversely affect performance of operating personnel, if 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shif ts are maintained in part or whole, then acceptable levels of performance frem operating personnelis assured through effective control of shift turnovers and plant activities. Overtime remains controlled by site administrative procedures in accordance with the NRC Policy Statement on working heurs (Generic Letter 82-12). No physical modification of the plant is volved. As such, the change does not introduce any new failure modes or conditions that may create a new or different accident. Therefore, plant operation in accordaace with the proposed amendment will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.

Editorial changes clarify sections 6.2.2.6.b. and 6.2.2.6.c. without changing the intent or meaning, lhe proposed changes meet the intent of the NRC Po!.cy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 82-12).

Changes to sections 4.5.F.3. 4.5.F.4., 4.5 8ASES, and 4.7.A 7.a. do not change the intent or meaning of the Technical Specifications or operating procedures. All previously performed functions arc being maintained.

Therefore, the changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from previously evaluated.

3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?

Establishing operating personnel work hours at "a normal 8 to 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> day, nominal 40-hour week" allows normal plant operations to be managed more effectively and does not adversely affect performance of operating personnel, if 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shifts are maintained in part or whole, then acceptable levels of performance from operating personnelis assured through effective control of shift turnovers and plant activities. Overtime remains controlled by site administrative procedures in accordance with the NRC Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 82-12). The proposed change involves no physical modification of the plant, or alterations to any accident or transient analysis, There are no BASES to the ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS section 6 to the Technical Specifications, Therefore, the change does not involve any significant reduction in a margin of safety.

Attachment 11 t3 JPN 97 038

-SAFETY EVALUATION Page 5 of 6 Editorial changes clarify _ sections 6,2.2.6.b. and 6.2.2.6.c. without changing

-the intent or meaning. The proposed changes meet the intent of the NRC .

Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter 8212).

Changes to sections 4.5.F.3.,4.5.F.4.,4.5 BASES, and 4.7.A.7.a. do not chenge the intent or meaning of the Technical Specifications or operating procedures. All previously performed functions are being maintained. l Therefore, the changes do not involve any significant reduction in a margin of-safety.-

V. IMPJIMENTATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES This amendment request meets the eligibility criteria for categorical ev.clusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9) as follows:

(i) the amendment involves no significant hazards considerations.

- As demonstrated in Section IV of the evaluation, the proposed change involves no significant hazards consideration.

(ii) there 3 no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite, ,

The proposed changes do not involve a physical alteration to the plant or revision to any plant operating procedures. - The changes are administrative in nature and do not affect the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite.

tid) there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

The proposed changes do not alter plant operating or surveillance procedures, and therefore will not change individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

Based on the above, it is concluded that there will be no impact on the environment resulting from the proposed changes and, the proposed changes meet the e iteria specified in 10 CFR 51.22 for a categorical exclusion from the requirementr ( f 10 CFR 51.21 relative to requiring'a specific environmental assessment by the Commission.

Additionally,~ implementation of the proposed changes will not adversely alter or affect the ALARA Program or the Fire Protection Program.

l u

Attachment ll 12 JPN 97 038 SAFETY EVALUATION Page 6 of 6 VI. spNplusipN Dased upon the discussion in previous sections, implementation of the proposed change in operating personnel shif t length does not involve a significant hazards consideration, or an unreviewed safety question, and will not endanger the health and safety of the public. Sufficient operating personnelis available to ensure that excessive use of overtime is not required for conduct of normal plant operation. The Plant Operating Review Committee and Safety Review Committee have reviewed this proposed Technical Specifications change and agree with this conclusion.

4

(

.. .-. _ _ _ _ . = - - _ . . . .. . - _ _. . - . _ . . _ .

i Attachment til to JPN 97 038 MAMKUP OF TECHNICAL. SPECIFICATION PAGE CHANGES Proposed Changes To The Technical Specificaticas Hegarding AdmialtitAttys_Qontrols For Ngsel WorkinaEours And Ass 91ated 1 Channes ,

i r

f I

i New York Power Authority JAMES A, FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No. 50-333 - ,

DPR 59

'h

_.m, , ._ ,

II !a ,

i il! I!

ljIl@ll1 llg,lil1 l11 l

e l l e

i

1 9 J

8 l ., ,, l I

WH.i!'!lii

. I I,,o i ,

j!!!lNilill!.. !. I t l.

~

3

- . o JAF9FP ,

4.7 (contd)

3.7 (conrQ '
s. Oxygen concentranon d,-

q/. Oxygen conc =casion

/- The pnmary contanment oxygen concentration shaR be a. The pnmary contanment oxygen concentrabon sher l be vriend to be witun Emdts once each wook. 3 mamtaned less then 4.0 volume percent while in the Run Instnament swveMances sher be perfommed as

> mode, except as M=rdad in 3.7AS.a and 3.7A6.b specded in Table 4.2-8.

bekm.

a. Primary contanment oxygen concentralen shaE be less then 4.0 volume percent witun 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of exceedng 15% of rated thermed power dunng 1

SI @

b. De-inertng may commence up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> prior to f reducmg thermal power to less then 15% of rated before a plant shutdown.

\

j c. If oxygen concentra0mn is yester then or equal to 4.0 volume pcTeent at any time while in the Run ,

modo, except as specded in 3.7A6.a or 3.7A6.h above, restore oxygen concentraban to less then 4.0 volume percent wein 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, othennse reduce thermal power to less then or equal to 15% of rated withm the next 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />.  ;

r

7. orywen. Torus oisterential Pressure 7. DryweE-Torus Dinerenelei Preeswo h D4erenbal presswa between the dryweR and tons a. The presswa dNierennd between the dryweE a.

shaB be mantaned at equal to or yester then 1.7 shef be vaiEed to be wein Ennes once 6 Instrument surveiRences shef be performed as psid excent as specded in (1) sad (2) below-specded in Table 4.2-8. & MES f

Amendment No. J6, )WT. 221 180 d

, w n --. - - - - - - - , - - - < - -. y . -, r - ,

1 .

s. ,

JApMpP I

' i 2 An SRO or an SRO wth a lioones isnhed to fuel handling shall dlroody supervise all Core  !

Ahoradons. This person shall have no other dubes during this time; ,

l  !

3. DELETED i 4, in the event of il%ess or unexpected absence, up to two (2) hours is allowed to restore i

the shift crew to the minimum complement.

5, The Cparations Manager, Assistant Operadons Manager, Shift Manager, and Coritrol . l Rocm Supervisor shall hold an SMO heense and the senior Nucisar Operator and the l '

Nuclear Control Operator shall hold an RO license or an SRO license.

6. Administradvs procedures shall be developed and implemented to limit the working hours '

.. of urnt str# who perform safety related functons; e.g., semor reactor operators, health physicots, auxiliary operators, and maintenance personnel who are woMng on satory related systems, Adequate shift coverage shall be maintained w6hout routine hoewy use of overtime. The:

l obpeceve shall be to have operating personnel work a r.sid : N:r C;, 2 N:r n:N while the plant is operating. Sfo/dhoutdd6 NOM

  • M #484 u>ent. ,

However, in the event that ur4@cswroblems require substandal amounts of overtime .

to be uovd or during extended pwad W shutdown for rotueung, major maintenance or l

major modincellons, on a temporary besle, he following guidelinea shall be followed:

a. An individual should not be permitted to work more than it hours straight, excluding shift tumover time, l
b. An individual should not be permitted to work more than is hours in any 24-hour period, nor more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in any 46 hour5.324074e-4 days <br />0.0128 hours <br />7.60582e-5 weeks <br />1.7503e-5 months <br /> per6ed, nor more than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> any seveMer period, all excluding shWt tumover time.  !

kf6 /ws.t Anuua4 work periods,%

c. A break of at least eight hours should be allowed shift tumover tW Le yhded J9ff92 MdA/( .rM, .

4 1 I d. Excoat dudng extended shutdown periods, the use of overnme should be  !

consioned on an inevidual hemis and not tw me entre staff on a shut. - i 1 i I Any devinden from me above guidelines shaN be aumwised by the $4e Execumve w me General Manager Operadone, w highw levels of management, in ace ,

j established procedures and with documentellon of the beeis for grondng the deviation. .

Controle shall be included in me procedures such met individual overtime shall be reviewed montdy by me Site Execudve QInger or his designes to aneurs that exce lI hours have nct been assigned. Routine deviellon from the above guidelines is not

  • authortsed.

t

. 228 Amendment No. ,2, ,100, '0?, '?O, ;^^, O'",  !

247a  !

[

y l

4

-..~..,_.m .-.m.-..,.m ,. _ . - - . - . ~ . . . ~ - _ . . _ _ _ _._ m.,..--.m. m m, .-,s ....~._.m.. .O-,,..-r,,__ _._.-.--,--J

-