ML20136B547
| ML20136B547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1984 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136A539 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 STA-802, NUDOCS 8601020653 | |
| Download: ML20136B547 (18) | |
Text
'
V (/
Y\\
(
CCHANCHE PEAK STEAM ELICTRIC STATION STATION ADHDCSTRATION MANUAL CONTROLLED COPY t{o. Odo FINAL ACCEFfANCE OF STATION STSTZMS, STRUCTURES & EQUI? MENT I
~
c
- 3) ' z2c ss PROCEDURE NO. STA-802 RETISION 30. 1
,)
l
\\
SU3MITTID BT:
DATI:
/C ADMUilSTRATIVE SUPE 11NTENDCIT I MM LJ DATE: //# b APPROVED BY:
MANAGER, FLA.W OPERATICNS Q-yh10 3 851113 CARDE85-59 ppg
'FOR MORWfigN ON3,
e a
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STAn 0N ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 121984 STA-802
'~
~
FINAL ACCIPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 2 0F 18 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to define the method for transferring overall responsibility for CPSES systems, scructures, and equipment to the TUCCO Plant Operacious. This transfer process is referred to as final acceptance. This procedure also provides methods and review guidelines which are used to provide reasonable assurance that systems, structures, and equipment can be operated and maintained in an efficient manner, and have suffered no unacceptable deterioration prior to the time of final acceptance. This procedure is in no way intended to serve as a mechanism for providing or verifying final inspections of construction activities or completion reviews of engineering, procurement, or quality assuraice activities. Such inspection and reviev activities remain the responsibility of the
' appropriate TUSI organi=ation or TUGC0 Quality Assurance.
2.0 Applicabiliev This procedure covers final acceptance by TUCCO Plant Operations of all systems, structures and equipment at CPSES, both saf ety-related and non-safety related, for Unit 1. Unit 2 and common. This procedure becomes effective when issued and will rensin in effeer until all
^
systems, structures, and equipment have been accepted by TUCCO Plant Operations.
3.0 Definitions 3.1 Final System Acceptance acceptance of responsibility by Plant operations to operate, t.ntain, test and modify a defined
-system.
3.2 Final Area Acceptance - acceptance of responsibility by Plant operations to maintain and modify a defined area.
3.3 Test Release (Turnover from Construction to Startup) - the transfer of component, partial subsystem custody from TUSI to Startup. The terms test release and turnover are synonymous.
(Refer to Procedure CP-SAP-3) 3.4 Custody - immediate authority and responsibility for operational control of systems or lipsent.
(Refer to Procedures CP-SAP-3 and CDA-105) 3.5 Master Data Base (MDB) - a computerized listing used to identify and track cuestanding items av.d vork rsnaining to be completed on systems, structures, and equipment prior to final acceptance by TUGCO.
/ ^.
V
CPSES ISSUE DATE PR6CEDURE NO.
SnTION ADMINISTRATION M DUAL JAN 12 tend Su-aO2 zj FDAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS, STRUCTURIS & EQUIP s.
REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 3 0F 18 3.6 Plant Operations Ptnchlist (POP) - a listing used to identify and track outstanding items and work remaining to be complaced on
)
systems, structures and equipment which have been finally I
accepted by TUGCO.
4.0 Instructions 4.1 General Acceptance Process The final acceptance process consists of four basic components:
Review of construction and engineering outstanding work items (Master Data Bare review)
Valkdowns of systems and areas for operability, maintainability, and identification of any damage.
Review of testi g completion Review of drawing adequacy The formal process of acceptance is generally initiated following
(~,
notification by Startup to Plant Operations that a particular sysrem or area is ready for acceptance. Following this not.fication, a formal review and walkdown is initiated by Plant Operations. These reviews and walkdowns are documented using either a System Acceptance Review Form (SARF) or an Area Acca ance Review Form (AART) as described in Section 4.3 and Sect n 4.8.
Following successful completion of the walkdowns and t. views the Ma.ager, Plant Operations shall approve the SARF or AARF and notify Startup that the system or area has been accepted. At this time, all responsibility for ~ operation, maintenance, work control, access control, and design modifications shall transfer to TUCCO Plant Operations. Any outstanding items associatad with the system or area shall be transferred from the Master Data Base to the Plant Operation Punchlist (or other work control or tracking system) and it shall become the responsibility of Plant Operations to track and resolve those items.
Pl:
Operations should perform informal preliminary walkdowns of sys ss and areas prior to notification of completion by Startup.
Thi is to help ensure that any items which may affect the operability or maintainability are identified and resolved in a j
timely manner prior to final acceptance.
i 4.2 Reseensib111 ties i
i O
4.1.1 Manager. Plant Overations - Responsible for approving the final acceptance of all systems and areas by TUGC0 Plant Operations including the transfer of any outstanding items "YOR lIF00150N TNJ
CPSIS ISSUE DATT PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MAFUAL JAN 121984 STA-802
('
~
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 4 0F 18 4.2.2 Engineering St.perintendent - responsible for coordination of reviews and walkdowns performed by the plant staff as part of the final acceptance revicw process. Responsible for walkdowns of systems and areas prior to final acceptance in the areas of I&C, Chemistry. Radiation Protection, and Results Engineering as appropriate.
Responsible for ensuring that any outstanding items identified during reviews and walkdowns are entered in the MDB.
Responsible for reviewing the MD3 to ensure that outstanding items are adequately identified or resolved prior to final system or area acceptance by TUGCO.
Responsible for ensuring that any outstanding items at the time of acceptance are tran 'arred from the MDB to the POP. Responsible for reviewing evaluations of outstanding items.
4.2.3 Operations Superintendent - responsible for performing walkdowns on systems and applicable areas prior to their final acceptance to identify items which could affect the allicient operation of the plant. Responsible for
]
evaluating applicable outstanding items prior to final acceptance.
4.2.4 Maintenance Sunerintendent - responsible for performing walkdowns of systems and areas prior to their final acceptance to identify any items which might impair the ability to maintain plant equipment in an efficient menner. Responsible for evaluating applicable outstanding items prior to final system or area acceptance.
4.2.5 Administrative Superintendent - responsible for performing walkdowns or systems and areas within his cognizance to identify any items needing correction. Responsible for evaluating applicable outstanding items prior to final acceptance.
Responsible for ensuring that records of final acceptance packages including all associated documentation are entered and maintained in the TUCCO Records Center.
Responsible for reviewing required drawings to deternine that they are adequate for Plant Operation use prior to final acceptance.
/ \\
v
.f-.
-~
1
- - ~.
f,[FOR INFORMATION0i0(
O 4
CPSES JgyE D4TTt2144 STA-802 PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS. STRUCTURES & EOUTPMENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 5 0F 18 4.3 Final System Acceptance Review Process 4.3.1 Startup should inform thes Manager, Plant Operations (MPO) when a system or subsystem is ready fee final acceptance review. The MPO shall direct the CPSES Engineering Superintendent to initiate a review to determine if the system is ready for final acceptance by TUGCO. This review should be initiated as soon as practical following notification.
4.3.2 This review shan be documented on the System Acceptance Review Form (SARF) (See Attachment 1) and its appropriate attachments. The Engineering Superintendent shall maintain a log of a u SARF's and track the progress of the review process. A status report of a n outstanding SARF's should be prepared and issued on regular basis.
4.3.3 The SARF shan describe (by means of drawings, etc.) the exact boundaries of the system or subsystem which is being reviewed for acceptance. The standard startup System / Subsystem boundaries and idactifiers shall be used to describe the system acceptance boundaries. Any h.,
exceptions to standard system boundaries shall be noted.
Subsystems of the naam systes may be grouped together if appropriate.
4.3.4 Reviews of construction and engineering completion, test results, and drawings along with physical system walkdowns shall be performed as described in Sections 4.4 through 4.7.
4.3.5 As each portion of the review is complaced the appropriate documentation shan be forwarded to the Engineering Superintendent who shall indicate satisfactory completion on the SARF. If any outstanding items are identified they shan be evaluated and resolved in accordance with Section 4.9 and, if appropriate, attached to the SARF for inclusion the final acceptance. Upon coupletion of all reviews and evalcations of outstanding items, the Engineering Superintendent shall sign the SARF under
" Evaluations Complate.
4.3.6 Upon satisfactory completion of the review process the Manager, Plant Operations shall approve the SARF. He shall notify Startup of the acceptance in writing and make other notifications as appropriate.
O NORfAFORMMION 0i0
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 121984 STA-802 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 6 0F 18 4.3.7 The Engineering Superintendent shall ensure that any outstanding items included in the acceptance are entered into the Plant Operations Punch 11st or other appropriate tracking system. Startup should ensure that these items are at the same time removed from active status on the MDB.
4.3.8 The completed SART and attached documentation shall be retained in accordance with Procedure STA-302.
4.4 Construction And Engineering Completion Review 4.4.1 Upon initiation of the SARF the Engineering Superintendent shall assign the Results Engineer responsibility for reviewing the Master Data Base for outstanding items on the system.
4.4.2 If there are no outstanding items the Results Engineer shall indicate such on the appropriate section of the SARF and sign it.
4.4.3 If there are outstanding items on the MDB, the Results f)
Engineer shall inform the Engineering Superintendent and determine any impact caused by the items. Outstanding items shall be reviewed and evaluated for inclusion in the final acceptance in accordance with Section 4.9.
4.4.4 For ASME Code Class systems the Results Engineer should ensure that all N5 certifications associated with the system are completed prior to acceptance.
4.4.5 At the time of acceptance the Results Engineer should ensure that any outstanding design change requests or proposed modifications which were determined not to be needed prior to acceptance are entered into the Plant Operations Punchlist for future action.
4.5 Walkdowns 4.5.1 Upon initiation of the SARF, the Engineering Superintendent shall coordinate with the other depart ent superintendents to ensure that final physical walkdowns of the system or subsystems under review are performed.
NOTE:
In general, preliminary valkdosus of all systems should be performed in advance of notification of completion by Startup. These early informal walkdoms vill help ensure that any outstanding items identified by Plant Operations are entered in the MDB in a timely manner for completion
. )
prior to final acceptance review.
4 w
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 121984 sTA-802 O
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 7 0F 18 4.5.2 Each system shall be walked down by Operations, Maintenance, and I&C personnel assigned by the appropriate superintendent. Additionally, depending upon the system the Engineering Superintendent may assign additional inspections in areas such as Chemistry or Radiation Protection, and coordinate with the Administrative Superintendent for Fire Protection, or Security walkdowns as appropriata.
4.5.3 The main purpose of the walkdowns is to identify any items which will adversely affeet the operability or maintainability of the system and to detect any gross physical deterioration which may have occurred subsequent to completion of a construction activity. The walkdowns should also review the system for any problems associated with radiation exposure control, fire protection, and security as appropriate. Guidelines for these walkdowns may be provided in Department instructions as appropr1 tea.
System documents such as flow diagrams, instrument lists, electrical diagrams and other drawings should be used -
during the walkdowns to ensure that all equipment is reviewed.
O NOTE:
These walkdowns are in no way intended to se w e as a mechanism for providing e verifying final QC or completion inspections of construction activities.
4.5.4 The results of each walkdown shall be de mented using the System Walkdown Rasults Form (Attachment.).
Any items discovered during these walkdowns which are not already noted on the MDB shall be documented and brought to the attention of the Results Engineer.
4.5.5 The Results Engineer shall ensure that the item is entered on the Master Data Base.
4.5.6 The completed System Walkdown Results Form shs11 be reviewed by the appropriate superintendent. The completed form shall be forwarded to the Engineering Superintendent and completien of the final walkdown s'
'l be indicated on the SARF.
4.6 Review of Test Results 4.6.1 The results of preoperational and acceptance tests are reviewed by the JTG in accordance with Procedure CP-SAP-11.
s 1
- .:=-FOR INTORWTiON ON*Y 3
~,_ _._.__
g9
CPSIS ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATICN ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 12 God STA-802 Q
^
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTDiS STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT REVISION NO. L PAGE 8 0F 18 4.6.2 Upon initiation of the SARF, the Results Engineer shan review the test package and note any outstanding ratest requirements.
4.6.3 The review of test results and identification of outstanding ratest items shan be documented using.
4.6.4 If there are outstanding retest requirements the Engineering Superintendent shall evaluate the inpact of performing the tests following final acceptance. This evaluation shall be done in accordance with Section 4.9.
4.7 Review of Drawings 4.7.1 Every effort should be made to obtain updated drawings.
The fonowing types of drawings 'or each system should be updated and have no DCA's or CMC's outstanding prior to system acceptance.
a)
Flow diagrams Q
b)
Electrical one line diagrams c)
I&C dia, ass d)
Elementary diagrams 4.7.2 The Engineering Su rintendent shan compile a list of all drawings associatac with the acceptance package and identify those that are required to be updated prior to final acceptance. He shan forward this list to the Administrative Superintendent.
4.7.3 The Adehistrative Superintendent shall review the drawings associated with the acceptance package to determine if they are an available and are legible and reproducible. He shall review all required drawings to ensure that an outstanding DCA's and CMC's have been incorporated. This review shan be documented using.
4.7.4 If the review is tisfactory this shall be noted on the SARF.
U M.,- -FOR INTORdTION ONJ w
CFSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE No.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL
,lAN 191CQd STA-802 n'
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION
~~
STSTEMS, STRUCTURES & EQUIFMENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 9 0F 18 4.7.5 If the review is not satisfactory the Administrative Superintendent shall inform the Engineering Superintendent who shall resolve any outstanding items in accordance with 1
Section 4.9.
4.8 Final Area Acceptance Review Frocess The final area acceptance review process shall be the same as that for system acceptance reviews and walkdowns described in Sections 4.3 through 4.7 with the following exceptions:
4.8.1 The area acceptance review shall be documented using the Area Acceptance Review Form (AARF) (See Attachment 2).
4.8.2 The boundaries of the area being reviewed shall be identified on the AARF using standard building and room identifiers. Rooms within a building may be grouped together but each room shall be identified by room number.
Any exceptions to standard boundaries shall be noted on the AARF.
4.8.3 The area review process shall be tracked using an AARF
(.,
Log.
4.8.
Physical area valkdowns shall be performed to detect any outstanding items which may adversely affect operability or maineminability and to detect any gross physical deterioration. These walkdowns should include factors such as radiation protection, fire protection, personnel safety, and access control. Specific guidelines for area valkdowns may be provided in Department instructions as appropriate.
NOTE:
These walkdowns are in no way intended to serve j
as a mechanism for providing or verifying final QC or completion inspections of construction activities.
The Maintenance and Operations Superintendent shall be responsible for ensuring that walkdowns are performed by i
members of their departments for appropriate areas.
The Mainistrative Superintendent shall ensure that walkdowns with regard to Security and Fire Protection are performed foe all areas.
.y u
Sf0R INFORMAT ON 0i0
CPSES JgS QAU PROCEDURE NO.
ide4 STA-802 STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL O#
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATICM STSTEMS, STRUCTURES & EQUI? MENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 10 0F 18 Additional walkdowns shan be performed by other groups as directed by the Engineering Superintendent. The results of these walkdowns including any items noted shall be documented on the Area Walkdown Results Form (Attachment 4).
4.8.5 Outstanding items shan be handled in accordance with Section 4.9.
4.8.6 There is ne review of test results aa ociated wi-J1 Final Area Acceptances.
4.8.7 Every effort should be made to update all applicable area drawings.
4.9 Evaluation and Resolution of Outstanding Items 4.9.1 Any outstanding items which are identified as a result of the reviews and walkdowns performed during the system or area acceptance process sha n be evaluated to determine if the item is to be included in the final acceptance or if it is to be completed prior to final acceptance. For open Q
items included as part of the final acceptance package it shall become the responsibility of Plant Operations to ensure that these items are trackad and satisfactorily re. solved.
4.9.2 The Engineering Superintendent shall evaluate the identified outstanding items and shall can upon other Plant Operations personnel to assist in these evaluations as appropriate.
4.9.3 The evaluations of outstanding items should consider the following factors as appropriate:
a)
Manpower and resources required to complete item b)
Impact on plant safety c)
Impact on plant operability and maintainability d)
Impact on plant licensing e)
Macpcwer and resources required to complete the itms following fuel load (including equipment accessibility Tech Spec limits, security considerations, etc.)
,,v NOR f F0NTl0NONLY w *=
- w
==.-e w
1
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 10100d STA-802 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS. STRUCTURES & EOUIPMENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 11 0F 18 f)
Impact on personnel radiation exposure (ALARA considerations) if the item is completed following Fuel Load g)
Impact on plant availability following Fuel Load h)
Impact on Initial Startup Testing including possible retest requirements.
4.9.4 If the evaluation indicates that it is appropriate for the item to be completed prior to final acceptance the Engineering Superintendent shall inform the Manager, Plant Operations (MPO). The MPO or his representative shall meet with appropriate personnel from TUSI Engineering.
Ccustruction. Startup or TUGC0 Quality Assurance to determine a resolution to the problem.
4.9.5 The following general criteria should be used in determining the readiness of a system or area for final acceptance. Will the outstanding item cause one of the following if not implemented:
h a).
Impair the ability of any safety-related system to perform its function b)
Create a situation which would jeopardize personnel safety or increase the risk of equipment damage.
c)
Impair the ability of the plant operating staff to operate plant equipment without compromising nuclear safety d)
Violata or not fulfill any commitment or requirement in the FSAR, Technical j
Specifications, Radiological Effluent Technical i
Specifications; or environmental discharge permits i
If any of the above criteria are not met the system or area vill not be accepted without permission of the Vice President, Nuclear or his designee.
4.9.6 Outstanding items which are decided to be included as part of the acceptance shall be identified on the SARF (or AARF) and its attachments. Copies of appropriate portions of the MD3 may be attached to the SARF (or AARF) for this purpose. These items shall be transferred to the Plant Operations Punchlist (POP) for tracking and resolution.
==
e
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL 84 STA-802 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT RF.T. ISION NO. 1 PAGE 12 0F 18 5.0 References 5.1 CrSES operations Adswatrative control and QA Plan 5.2 Procedure CP-SAP-3, " Custody Transfer of Station Components" 5.3 Procedure CP-SAP-11. " Review, Approval and Retention of Test Results" 5.4 Procedura ODA-105, " Equipment Custody Transfer from Startup to Operations" 5.5 Procedure STA-302, " Station Records" 6.0 Attachments 6.1 System Acceptance Review Form 6.2 Area Acceptance Review Form 6.3 System Walkdown Results Form Cs';
6.4 Area Walkdown Results Form 6.5 Testing Review Forn 6.6 Drawing Review Form su NOR5FbR5Il0NONI"3Y 1
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 121984 STA-802 n
t FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS. STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 13 0F 18 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 1 0F 1 C?sts PLU T OMIAT!ct:S STSTIX aC0ZPTAEE RI71rd FCRM System / Subsystem 3o.
Descriptions Exceptions to St w a M Soundary:
Tas 50 (attached ear,kad up" drawings se appropriate)
SARF 3TTIAZZD: /s/
Dates Engineer 2ng Smyt.
MASTEE DAZA SASE 11TI23r Couplaced /s/
Dates tasulta rap -r outsw *ag Items:
3e Tee (attaca list)
ST3 TIM VALIDOURS (attack resmits forms)
Dest /See Date Causleted outstandine Itans Operations
[ 5e [ Yes Maintenance
[ 5e ~ Ye
~
I&C 5e [ Tee
~
~
other 5e Tes
~
5e [ Tee
[ 5e Tea
~
TEST R15LL*3 RETIZ5ft 34ee Campleeed Applicable Tests:
(attach forms)
Outstanding Items 5e ~ Tes
~
DRAN DC RZTIZN: Date Completed (ettash form)
Outstanding Items
[ 5e [ Tee SAAF ETAL3A 105 m /s/
Dates Engineertag Sept.
AP730TAL This systes/ssbeystem has been accepted. All work and design activities including resolution of the outstanding items listed above are the responsibility of T::GC0 Flaat Operations.
/s/
Dates saanger. flant operations m -do2-t V,
R-1
~
I i
,--,--w,_.
--,,n,----
I Ja}{ii 12 L 4 SUE DA PROCEDURE NO.
CPSES STA-802 STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL
'3
-FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTDiS STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 14 OF 18 ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 1 0F 1 C7sts Ptur ort ATrews AREA ACCIFTANCZ RE7!rd Met tids/ teen Se.(s):
Descripties
,(attacted marhed op dreertags as appropriate)
AAAF ZETTIATED: /s/
Dates Engineering Sept.
ItasTER DATA Bast RZ7IZE Completed: /e/
Date:
Remaica rassmear
~
Outs *== ding Itase se Tee (attach list)
ARIA EALIDOBES (attack results forse)
Dest /See Date Caeoleted Outstandire frame Operations
[ 5e ] Yes Maiatemense se [ Tee r
Security
~
38 Tee Fire Protection 38 T**
Others
~
3e Tes l
~
5e ] Yes
~
~
5e Tee DRAVING RITIZU Date Csep_leted (attach form)
~
Ostsenadf ag 1.ame:
5e ' ~ Yes AARF ETA!AATION CCRIPLCID: /s/
Cates Engineerlag Sept.
This arms has been accepted. All w % sad design activities tacleding reseletism of the outstaa
+ itema listed above are the reopensibility of TlTOCO Flaat Operas
.s.
This acceptance does not apply to systema contained withis the area.
/s/
Date Manager. flant Gperations 5*.A-402-1 R-1 3u 30R IIIFURIATION ON Y
,N g g
,y____,
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTIULTION MANUAL JAN 121084 STA-802 f.
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTD!S, STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 15 0F 18 ATTACHMENT 3 PAGE 1 0F 1 STSTEM WALKDOWN RESULTS FORM System / Subsystem No.:
==
Description:==
Dept / Sect Performing Walkdown:
The system has been physically walked down and the results are as follows:
No additional items were discovered which were not already identified on the Master Data Base.
The following items v:ce discovered (use Attachment if necessary):
Perfor:ned by: /s.
Date:
Reviewed by: /s/
Date:
Dept. Supt.
This form is to be forwarded to the CPSES Engineering Superintendent and attached to the SAPJ l
i
.l STA-802-3 R-1 90ddR5RM5Tl0N ON Y
. * + -..... - -
9
CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 121984 STA-802
')
FINAL ACCZPTANCE OF STATION SYSTD!S,. STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 16 0F 18 ATTACEMDrr 4 PAGE 1 0F 1 ARIA WALKDOWN RESULTS FORM System / Subsystem No.:
==
Description:==
Dept / Sect Performing Walkdown:
The system has been physically walked down and the results are as follows:
No additional items were discovered which were not already identified on the Master Data Base.
The following items were discovered (use Attachment if necessary):
(
s v
Access to the area is controllable:
Yes No by means of:
Performed by: /s/
Date:
Reviewed by: /s/
Date:
Dept. Supt.
This form is to be forwarded to the CPSES Engineering Superintendent and attached to the AART I)
STA-802-4 g_1 Y,:-FOR [N)RMITION DiLY
.- e CPSES ISSUE DATE PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL JAN 121984 STA-802
~
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTDiS STRUCTURES & EQUI? MENT RE7ISION NO. 1 PAGE 17 0F 18 ATTACHMENT 5 PAGE 1 0F 1 CPSES PI. ANT OPERATIONS TESTING REVIEW FORM System / Subsystem No:
==
Description:==
Preoperational/ Acceptance Test No:
Title:
The results of this Preoperational Test have been approved by the Joint Test Group (on
).
JTG Meeting No.
(date)
The results of this Acceptance Test have been approved by the Manager, Nuclear Operations on (date)
O The following outstanding testing items were identified during the final acceptance review.
Ites No.
Description 1
The items listed abcve have been evaluated for impact on Plant Operations and have been accepted b* Plant Operations.
Performed By: /s/
Date:
Reviewed By:
/s/
Date:
This form is to be forwarded to the CPSES Engineering Superintendent and attached to the SARF STA-802-5 R-1 YOR lilFORdTION 0iG m
CPSES PROCEDURE NO.
STATION ADMINISTRATION MANUAL h
84 STA-802 I)
FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STATION SYSTEMS. STRUCTURES & EQUIPMENT REVISION NO. 1 PAGE 18 0F 18 ATTACEMENT 6 PAGE 1 0F 1 CPSES PLANT OPERATIONS DRAk'ING REVIEW FORM System / Subsystem No:
Building / Room No.:
==
Description:==
A review has been performed to verify the adequacy of all drawing of the following types associated with this systam/ area: (Attach list)
Flow Diagrams Electrical One Line Diagrams 0
I'c t P ni ir -
Other Drawings are legible and reproducible Yes No There is outstanding change paper against these drawings Yes No Attach list of outstanding items.
Performed By: /s/
Date:
Reviewed By:
/s/
Date:
Administrative Superintendent i
This form is to be forwarded to the CPSES Engineering Superintendent and attached to the SARF STA-802-6 R-1 i
.