ML20136A697
Text
l gc *
' t,:
I F ;4.yJftCL, "i
2 g
WIY
' f l'
,i l
s
'rjt:::
?..;.
l l
C; UMTED STATES i
NUctEAR REGUtATORY COMMISSloN l
4.~
wasmwaren, o. c. nm l
YhE l '! F o c.cc m zsecarta v September 26, 1975 l].
i i
ME)!ORANDU>l FOR:
Lee V. Gossick, Executive i
Director for Operations F
b FRO >!:
Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary
SUBJECT:
SECY - INV;0 R T THE ALLEGED SECURITY PROBLEM AT THREE MILE ISlAh y LEAR POWER STATION l
Attached are comments by members of the Commission concerning the proposed NRC responses to Senator Schwei*aer and Mr. Nader, Included are comments on the letters and enclosed investigation reports, ricase review the draft responses and the report for incorporation of these comments.
The revised letter and enclosures should be returned for Commissioner action by October 3, 1975.
Attachments:
Commissioner Comments cc:
Chairman Anders Commissioner Rowden Commissioner Mason Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Kennedy Director, Inspection 6 Enforcement Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Director, Standards Development Executive Legal Director i
(
,y
-y i( $96/Z00 VA
/ VAT) gri-251
- /
~
5%
7 9.0~475-0'600 fl
l ]!-
A 1
l i
('
i
)
h 1-:onorable Richard S. Schweiker.f.
a.
i
~
tie appreciate your concerns as it is cur belief that physical protection i
p'rogra=s for nuclear power reactors =est be carefully for=ulated.
l cvaluated, i=ple=ented and inspcceed, tie consider adequate physical I
security to be a =atter of high priority.
4 Thank you for your interest in this =atter.
i j
Sincerely,
}
1 William A. Anders Chair =an
Enclosure:
Investigation Report No. 50-289/75-18 7 F.' M 3 4
e
-~~
Ol.
g
\\(
4.-
\\t i
".r. Ralph Nader 2000 "P" Street, N.U.
7th Floor Usshington, D.C.
20036
)
Dear Mr. Nader:
This is 1. rasponse to your letter of June 4.1775, in which you request an investigation of security operations at all nucle:r power plante. Your request is prompted by "... the serious probic:s at 4
Three Mile Island and M111stene."
i a
An investigation has been co:pleted of the z.llegations cade by the j
j two former watchmen who were e= ployed at the Metropolitan Edison Company's Three Mile Island site. A copy of the investigation report i
We found that the physical protection progrs:s currently is enclosed,
&,.:wt
~
- 17. th;.... w ir.s tar.: r in scets all applicable NRC requirc=ents.
i I
.+4,w
< z, -<n-e 4, m
- r. -p,... < --3=;;;;;;; 7, ;
A m e_.
M.
. f.
c 5the infractions had been identified and corrected by the e
licensye independently of the infor:ation provided by the two former c
itu t c d<.cc e oibed
'" **b"' p' l
eg Furthermore,theissuesofsecessandkey,[ontro1Yro catchmen.
identif ed and correctivo action verified as a result of URC inspections i
t
.. A
" [e K~
u.
4_
,h,,p in only three nstances were Infractions note:! In the complete implementatio of the physical protection program; namely, the inadequ::ry of control ovar gato locks and keys, inadequacy of the system of access contrnt to prin l
F buildings, and the entry of a watchman into the Control Room.
~
4
.:d.-r *
' l' T
1 l
.a
[2 l
l I
~2-y.r. Ralph Nadar Corrections of security itens of noncenpliance at Millotone were verified F
by direct observation of ERC inspeerors.
Of further interest is the fact 1
/
j thatourinsp/
{esent a/
e[torswere t the Millstone site o April 11, when
/
/
a bonb threat and a fir of s sus icious origin occur ed.
Our in pectors
/
/
/
/
/
ro eCures re utred by IEC were efficiently and effec-
,/velyf./ observed t..at the p/
/
ti ollowed by the utili,ty.
(
/.c a result of the above findings and inspection efforts, ue do not consider that there are serious prob 1cus at the Three Mile Island and Millstone cites. He believe our existing inspection program is suf-ficient to identify problensjand im) aNs c. in ne (o{.see.necessaryb 10 L'tb #,a.
c
- h% 4
- 4 ti ih ri-
%;LtT.
j Due to the addition of the requirecent for reactor physical security plans in April 1974, and subsequent revisions of reactor license con-ditict.s, we have devoted special attention to the inspection of physical
- r. curity during the last year. Since March 1974,12C inspectors have devor.ed in excess of 200 can-days at forty-one plant sites inspecting phycical security. Physical security reviews and inspections are conducted __ _
Unannounced reinspections prior to the issuance of operating licenses.
at operating plants are part of our routine inspection progran.
77.
.n ~- e.
... a
ace.
n A
- A's e g}pti..L,
y
.s.
i.
?,.y i
5!:
fh"
- r. Ralph :tador te se picmed Evve
- A64kle, l
E f,ng.c::3h our investipA ht a
[
3ations revealed no serious items of nonec=pliance, it L. cur belief that physical protection progre=s for nuclear power reactors nust be carefully formulated, evaluated, implemented and inspected. We t
]
consider cdequate physical ' security to be a natter of continuing high i
priority.
l i
j Sincerely, l
7 T099 C C 124114em A-And ws Chimn i
Enclosure:
Investigation Report No. 50-2d9/75-18 CW' r* t 4 s
- /e
.. e,' '4) s N N *O
W**N ',*.*, ;D -
- ? ct
- Q %.3 7.,,
i
.c y [h j
c' l
f*
i
,$, s, ',
4 ;.
i.": '
l t r;.
i a
l f.
Ti-4
- .g:'
p
.Y j
+3L
!L i*
- . t It is suggested that the investigation report be expanded i
l from the sentence, "The causes of the layoffs were complex l
l but did not relate to a lack of security consciousness by I
licensee management." to explain specifically why the men were laid off.
?
I 1
s l
l 1
i I
l i
t l
l k
l I
4
- 4 i
I i
^
l l
7t'.
r~i.?
~
- r..
1
{.-
t l
k u
1 -
9 d
i CP v' n ~g.-
.~1
.r c,
"r as:
h' f.llonorable Richard S. Schwaiker l
8 United States Senate i
tu 1
" Dear. Senator Schweiheri
$This,is in response to your letter of June 6,1975, requesting an inves
?
{
l h Three
' k;by the !!uclear Regulatory Co:rmission of the allegations con of the fccility.
Hile Island !!uclear power Station made by two former watchmen l
{@"
k An investigation has been completed of the allegations made by the tuo former A copy of the at the raetropolitan Edison's Three Mile Island site.
5 watchmen 5
investigation report is enclosed.
The I:3C investigation has identified three infractions of agency regulations.
These relate to the inadequacy of control over gate locks and keys; the inadequa of the system of access control to principal buildings; and the ent'ry of a watch It should be noted that these conditions occurred 'and into the Control Room.
made their allegations.
were corrected well before the watchmen The allegation that a gate was removed from its hinges was confirmed, thoug f.
The inv'estigation t..
the incident did not result in a threat to the plant's security.
.hfurther found that the watchmen's dismissal was not related to their
[J'
$ ' reDarding security. One allegation dealt with security conditions at anoth ki This plant is still under 5
nuclear plant in the same Three Mile Island complex.
Other
- [c construction and is not yet subject to NRC's security requirements.
[
allegations related to conditions, below the level of infractions, which
?.
- These include the report' of corrected prior to the date of the allegations.
J' t..'
M problems with the elcetronic surveillance system and the allegation tha
(
7 Still I (
several occasions, patrols,were falsely logged in as having taken place.
t w
tw other allegations were not confirmed. The I:RC is fully satisfied that at this
~.'
RC requirenents J time the plant's physical protection program meets all applicable i i
y aa A:
s aa
-4.
=.'
.f[;;ay'*
3:... ;.-
2-flll Due to the addition of the requirement for reactor physica
\\
VQ.
. in April 1974, and subsequent revisions of reactor license conditions, tre have l[ devoted special attention to the inspection of physical security during the s.
last year.
Since 14 arch 1974, ilRC inspectors have devoted in excess of 200 man-
,+
~
days at forty-one plant sites inspecting physical security.
Physical security reviews and inspections are ' conducted ' prior to the issuance of operating licenses.
Unannounced reinspections at operating plants are part of our routine inspectica program.
- g,
!!e appreciate your concerns.
It is our belief that physical protection programs
.y
' ). for nuclear power reactors must be carefully formulated, evaluated, implemented and inspected. lie consider adequate physical security to be a matter of high priority.
Thank you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
\\
115111am A. Anders Chairman
Enclosure:
Investigation Report f;o. 50-289/75-18 6
9
- T,0
':3 c 97,-(6 4/s M,
s.
s
Qig
=^-
y@;..~;.r;;~y.;;;f3!i:@y.y,,.y.y..y.... I....
-~m.:y
~ W
?
- il
- ,b.#@,?" '.5 E'
>.Q; ;L Q}lqif.
WD-ycs y' y
,;;g;s;,n..'.
. a ; 9 p., 4~.y;; @$ N,; &c.% ; Q g
~;;g e.:,.:.v,::gg;. :x. ;,
+ :..
Mwr;. A
- p.
y
.y,
.. ~,;,dW +y.Q.m,., :t. nQ E.. .MA,W;'.;' '
.s.
w.
r.
.. w. s
./
.[;!c ' a.
lle. P.a1ph Hader? @'*
- fi *
'1
~ c #,.... c.
9
'f P
EM2030>"P" Street.1H.'WN}M,'k't Q.jyEd3M:, '
,.M[
i 7 th Fi cori ?': t.'d ~ Y 4 M~
~n cW% %
D'~.D Y: $ Q " Q M.:
m.
M'a W T.... E.?
~
y@Machington f D. C'.720036W
Dear Mr.'.flader:
- . zNy f?&pg V
t W pnWelQ
- ?$gg uumw$w g
- c.
1,t... 0 d N..
hwu: V:
pc.w w w %p%
g y,
1 O.This is in response to your, letter'of June 4.'1975,-iri which you r'equest an
~
4.
.g htfinvestigation of security operations at all nuclear po.wer plants._ :Your request da y;q i.s prompted byl"... the serious problems at Three Mile Island and M111stene."
- c..g
- y.. a
$n 1y An inves'tigation has been completed of the allegations made by the' two former y:s '
g4', watchmen at the Metropolitan Edison's Three Mile I,sland site. A copy of the
/w,~gQ investigation' report is enclosed.
A:
c1 i% The flRC investigation has identified three infractions of agency regulations.
.h'
$. ':. These relate to the inadequacy of control over gate locks and keys; the inadequacy l
1, i
(., of the system of access control to principal buildings; and the entry of a uatchmn 4
into the Control Room.
It should be noted that these conditions occurred and
.;6 were corrected well before the watchmen made their allegations.
4 M'.: g R7The allegation that a gate was removed from its hinges was confirnied, though llr:'.
,. the incident did not result in a threat to the nlant's security..~ The investigation
+
.w
.~
- .- further found that the watchmen's dismissal was not related to their complaint
?.'f[; -.h<- regarding security [ One allegatio hi v..
1lt.
nuclear' plant in the same Three Mile Island complex. This plant is still,under b
construction and is not yet subject to tiRC's security requirements.' Other' v.
M..W - allegations related to cor$ditions, below the level of infr ew d.4 corrected' prior to th'e date of the allegations. 'These include the report of h;
- ,v 1.,
- c... :< 1 dr
..n4.
i iproblems with.theTelectroni.c -c surveillance system and the allegation that on i
f
- .;q;p..
- .. w >
m ? %... i3mv L%
i M;%:.y 'i.";f o;ns,t patrol s were,fal sely.l ogged.i k,4y es having _taken place. Stiil severa11occas kNV%4afog ere'nobconfirmed.i :tw%:4.: 4.f.y.eM.%.+.
thertallegations w%%%),5.Mihi&Th'e:t:P.C is~ fully' satisfied that at this N
es
~
. i."1 inspectors have also verified the correction of certain items of non-cceplience i; the physical security progrcm at f4illstone.
On to the addition of the requirement for rea: tor physical security plans in April 1974. und subsequent revisions fo reactor license conditions, we have davoted special attention to the inspection of physical security during the last
)
Since flarch 1974, ICC inspectors have devoted in excess of 200 man-days year.
J at forty-cne plant sites inspecting physical security.
Physical security reviews
]
and inspections are conducted prior to the issuance of operating licenses.
Unannounced reinspections at operating plants are part of our routine inspection program.
I As a result of the above finding, and inspection efforts, we do not consider that there are serious security problems at the Three flile Island and fillistone sites.
!!a believe our inspection program is able to identify problems and-insure necessary 'orrective action in a timely manner.
1:e appreciate your concerns.
It is our belief that physical protection programs for nuclear power reactors must be carefully formulated, evaluated, implemented and inspected.
!!e consider adequate physical security to be a matter of high nriority.
Thank you for your interest in this patter.
Sincerely, ch
! llliam A. An:!ces r*Q,'
Chaircan Enclosura:
Investigation P.eport l1o. 50-289/75-18
/
l 3 September 1975 1
i FROM:
Comissioner Gilinsky
SUBJECT:
Coments on SECY 75-454. Three title Island Investigation i
1.
Page 24. Apparently the jobs offered to the men were indeed i
comparable to their jobs at TMI. The text, however, indicates only that the salaries were the same and that the location of the offered jobs were nearby. The fact that the jobs were comparable in all respects should be expressly stated.
2.
Page 29. The first paragraph of subsection "c" should be rephrased. Ilhile it is. technically true that the allegations were not borne out because the records were falsified by certain guards, rather than guard serceants,it is misleading to state that there is'no basis" for the allegations. This paragraph should acknowledge that falsifications were made, though not, as Darcy and Shapiro alleged, by BISS sergeants.
~_
s u 3.
Pages 33-39. This section, especially subsection c on page 39, should be reworked to explain why certain witnesses were believed while others were not,and a coherent statement of what we*think N
1.appened should be given.
Secondly, the failure to interview w
t N i tiitness Q" as to whether he ser arried fir 4rms should bk.
g, explained. Third, the identity (letter designation) of the two s
.. ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _... _ _. _... _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _.. _ _. _ _ _. _.. _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..
i w.
I l
i l
guards who apparently failed the firearms training course should i
j be stated so that it can be determined whether they ever carried firearms.
Finally, evidence fro.i the 'og indicating which guards l
stare issued firearms should be included to corroborate our view i
i of the facts.
i.
l
~
'i cc:
S.J. Chilk, SECY i
i i
i l,
i
'J i
72-263 1
i J
l; i
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO.1MISS10N W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20585 1
CPPl:C OP THE COMMISSIONER August 28, 1975 NOTE FOR COMMISSIONER MASON:
SECY-75-454 IN" STIGATION OF THE ALLEGED SECURITY PROBLEM AT THPEE-MILE ISLAND This package contains two letters - one to Senator Schweiker; the other to Nader, both of which were related to the Three-Mile Island station.
(I should mention that Nader also referred to the security problem at Millstone.)
I think that both letters However, I would add the following are acceptuble.
paragraph as a third paragraph to Senator Schweiker's letter which would state rg"Due to the addition of the requirement for reactor physical security plants in April, 1974, in subsequent revisions of reactor license 7
conditions, we have devoted special attention to the inspection of physical security at all plants during the lost year.
Since March, 1974, NRC inspectors have devoted an excess of 200 man days at 41 plant sites inspecting physical security.
Physical security reviews and inspections are conducted prior to the issuance of operating j
i and continued unannounced reinspections
- licensus, occur at operating plants."
e f
t
~
Larry s
s b
cc J. Hard n
)
H..... m: ~4 se s
~
v 7
.v; u.jk.x l
"l%"26%
([
L.
{,h),
9 n'
--