ML20134B617
Text
[
l 2m-(-
I WY sg Oceket No. 50-523 nem Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 21666 Phoenix. Arizona 85036 Attention: Mr. E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
Vice President, Cohstruction Projects and ANPP Director i
l j
Gentlemen:
This refera to the telephone conversations between Messrs. Dodds, 1
Vorderbrueggen and Haist of this office with you on Hay 8,1979, and l
with Mr. Hand of your staff and Bechtel project personnel on May 9,1979, regarding severe misfit and distortion problems associated with the installation of the Unit 1 containment dome liner segments and the current field procedures to make force fit-ups. As you know, these problems were discussed on May 4,1979 during our construction inspec-tien at the Palo Verde plant site.
In this regard, it is our uncerstanding that you are taking the following actiens:
1.
Work has been sushended on dome segments of Unit 1 until it has been determined that appropriate remedial measures can be implemented to prevent high residual stresses frem being induced in the finished welds on the liner plate, and these remedial measures have been.
reviewed with Region V.
2.
For Unit 2, it is understcod that no erection or weldian of 30 degree sencents will be comnleted on the containment dome until the prob-lem has been resolved and reviewed with Region V.
l 3.
Structural specialists from the Bechtel 1.os Angeles office are L:
exaufning the situation at the work location and will identify the l
activities necessary to resolve the existing conditions, and the procedural measures needed to prevent reoccurrence of a similar L
condition on Units 2 and 3.
YM Rv s//
n n
LEVordEbruesgen:m RT0 odd
[
neer RNoelken
"~
l
__.5/7/79.
_5LR/79
._5/fj79 5/f/79 8508150692 850703 I
.LEIGHTD84-293 PDR l'
S(b)-
E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
- 4.
Arrangements are being made for a meeting in the flRC Region V offica in Walnut Creek on Friday, May 11,1979 between Ar6 zona Public Service and Bechtel Persennel, and cognizant members of my staff, to discuss this mattar and the corrective measures which you i
are developing.
If our understanding as described above is incorrect, please contact this office promptly.
Sincerely, R. H. Engelken Director i
Copy sent to Thomas Brockett - May 15, 1979 C. Polusny U. P. Ellis l
(i RV made Distribution to RV POR 4
D l
e e
^
- *[..
- - T-MC 295$
~
APPINDIX C REGION V
ACTT0;{ PLur Iacilit'/ -
Appraisal Date - 5/30/80 1.
E.<e:si. Led Enforcement Action None needed at present 2.
Insoection Pr,ogr:ua Channes (include increased or decreased frecuenev) i Increased inspection in the areas of containment dome liner installation.
pipe hangers and supports, and equipment storage and maintenance.
Decreased inspection in the areas of foundations and concrete activities.
1 3.
?!anseesent Ifeetints_fl.innej i
None planned except for annual SALP meeting. An attempt will be made to hold the annual meeting in conjunction with the annual Quality Assurance inspection exit meeting.
4 Status' of Action From,freviouy, Appraisals NA 1
l' c
' Segtonal Director l
\\.
L l
B
.--e v,,
9
.wp-
--n--.
,n
-.-e m-
-,e---.-
--m
1 U
-i
,\\
TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY a on ::-> ;< an Tecnocic;; i...
a PFR NO.:
AFFECTEDITEM:
pb89 m A Weld Wire PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Date August 1,1933 Pcge 1
of 7
r Potential Finding Report Revision Summar/
Purpose of issue /
Rev..ision Date Prepared by Sections Changed Mf.eOur e ep B/1/83 M. G. Dunlap Original Issue i
~
w I
9 6
d em Fo t A-N -Li3 Lb
--e
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO.
2435:018 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS:
Weld Wire Heat 57-L in Lines 1 WOO 4IB-10-1PC10 and 1WO14B-10-1PC8 (Reference Single System WG. M568) -
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE 00CUMENTS:
ASME SFA 5.23 A1 (Section II, Part C)
BASIC REQUIREMENT:
bb"ganese content is limited to 1.%
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
Weld sample shows Manganese content to be 1.28%
r' i
8/I./83 i
PREPARED BY
)
~ DATE USE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS FOTENTIAL FINDING REPORT.
SIGNATURE:
DATE PAGE.2 _0F 7 a
l.
O B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO.
2485:018 REVISION ~
O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY:
DATE:
REASON (S):
4 b
N AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY,: M-E:
O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING iS INVAllD BY:
DATE:
REASON (S):
a.
O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR
,BY:
DATE:
REASON (S):
PAGE 3 0F 7
r
f g'.f,
._. 7 g.
g 8
PFR NO.yo': d RtyiS:0N '"
}
C. SEVIEW BY DFIGINAL DESIGN DRGANIZATION
. ()
t i
1.1 I
Pj
% AGREE WITH PDTE!!TIAL FINDING STATEMErd.h'} -
-l1
!q f@i
- j.
kr"AGF.EE" EDX IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPACE SELOWTO PROVIDE p3 1NFORMAT104.'.HICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW
- y i
p
-COMMITTEE IN CLGSIFYING THE POTENTI AL FINDING.
.,f
. t.,..
9 1
- i -
D DISAGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEf.'.E. NT m
i a
"y f.$
OSE THE SPACE BELOWTO FHOVIDE'ADDITIONALINFORM ATION TH AT % 3Y.
a CL AHIFIES Tile DISAGREEMENT WJTH THE FDTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT.
'.1 y
th ADDIT UN,SOFFLY OPlES OF ANY DOCUMENTAT10N TilAT SUPPORTS jy Q
r.Q
'Dt3AGa ; MENT.(UEE,,0NTINL
- TION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) jj';j T
h.
-EY:
A 1DATE: 50 b
b's J.
- .1:
'I,.{!%.
c u
y
\\
t
[
- t..
W 30MMENTS l! j,
I
' iT '
. i.f. <.t
..i y..
.+,
.This condition was preViculdy Tcferenced on t
various Docuecat Deficioney:Kotices in other j;h.:,
'../.
i G>
'6f '
M psekages.-
gi ;,
e y'
,.6 m/[ '
These existing Docucent' Deficienc[ Notice.
f;
. ; f..
s t
{,
-items will.be up-graded to a Fon-Conformance i
'.)
W ii. l
' ' Report and the remaining packages Mll be.
y!
i; ',{ ; ;
checked to-verif y the tuse of this.hateria.l.
- 1. !..c E
.w 4
2 All packsges referen'cing the. us'aidf this,
!. [ i. ' '.!
?
!. k.i i.
r; h. 9
.b If.
).'
natcrial vill be not'e'd on this Eon ~-Conformance.
.I
- .,e. '!
p Repert.
', '{.
)
{f f i.......
y i
'..q.
y,.,.
W :l
. ;ll 1 gp,c, y..
.j.,
p.
..g.
eg
(.
......p.
n,6
- e.,,. '
... u.
~
n als f f
Q:
'p.f
.p.
. : g.
z r.r l':E.
n;.. ),-
i.;
nq
):
c p
. : t y..
4 p ;~
,5,b.7 ci.
$]
h
' "Y m
?..b ?
V;,
M y :.
- 17..
m
- c ;
n.
..'e
.i,
3 ;.;
i.;.
p (
.i.e.
1.
~
h.g l
< p b' i. ). ;
- t
. a. : !:
p
]
. j {.
],
f, p
as p
i i
l
)
l
=
l i
Page 4 of 7 1
j
..,-g
- n
.,9
D. tif.V:EW CF 0 2.lGINAL DET GN ORGANIZATION 2485:018 PFR NO.
REVISION
- EsponsE.
I REVIE?v SY TPT INITIATOR O AGREE WITH 000 -SEND TO FRC O 'AG REE WITH 000 - REVISE O AGPEE WITH 000 alNVALID D CISAGREE WITH 000-SEND TO FRC (ATTACH RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT)
COMMENT:
The OD0's response indicated that the condition was previously reference.! on various Docu.nent Deficiency Notices in other packages. It appears that not all the packages with the subject material were noted. But the ODO stated that a Non-Conformance Report will be generated, and all remaining packages referencing the use of the material will be noted on the Non-Conformance Report.
This' is a satisfactory method to handle the problem.
N O-DATE: 8/l6/83 BY:
v REVIEW BY THE TPT TASK LEADER
~
G AGREEWITH IN!TIATOR O DISAGREE WITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS)
COMMENT:
None i
BY:
DATE:
J PAGE_ 10F 7 J
E. RECOMMENDATION BY FINDINGS 2485:018 REVIEW COMMITTEE PFR NO.
REVISION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED i
a e
BY:
0 ATE:
DEFINITION:
OADEQUATE OINADEQUATE VALIDITY:
O VAllD OlNVAllD CLASSIFICATION:
O DBSERVATION O FINDING e
JUSTIFICATION CLASSIFICATION CRITERION NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON "0BSERVATION" OR " FINDING" CLASSIFICATION:
/
,t BY:
DATE:
F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER O ACCEN O REJECT BY:
DATE:
l
IMPACT ASSESSMENT g
N[
~
PFR NO.
2485:018 REVISION
~
~
~~
AFFECTE0 ITEM:
Weld Wire Heat 57-L in Lines lWOO4DB-10-1PC10 and 1W014B-10-1PC8 A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATO R:
- 1. WHICH OF THE FIRST TWO POTENTIAL FINDING CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA APPLIES TO THIS PFR7 10,2O N/(
- 2. IN WHAT WAY MIGHT A SUBSTANTI AL SAFETY HAZAR0 BE CREATED AS A RESULT OF THE DEVIATICN OR ERROR (IF 1 CR 2 ABOVE WAS CHECKED)?:
- 3. OTHER COMMENTS:
In this case, the code (SPA-5.23) states that the maximum Mn content can be 1.00%. The sample is 1.28%.'
The additional.28T, from a functional standpoint has no impact there will be a slight increase in tensile-and impact strength.
PREPARE 0 BY: NW O. A" * - '
OATE': Wis,A3 V
t j
B. PREPARATION 8Y TFT TASK LEADER:
f'
- 1. COMMENT ON AB0VE REPLIES:
j No'ne i
l l
- 2. DOES EVIDENCE EXIST OF MULTIPLE SIMILAR DEVIATIONS OR ERRORS?
}
IF S0, LIST RELEVANT PFR N0'S:
l Mone
- 3. IF POTENTIAL FINDING CLAS$lFICATION CRITERIA 3,4, OR 5 APPLIES, STATE WHICH ONE:
i 3 0,4 0,5 0,NONE D I
- 4. WHAT is YOUR JUDGEMENT OF THE LIKELlH000 0F MULTIPLE SIMILAR DEVIATIONS OR ERRORS ACTUALLY CREATING A SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARD - AND OF WHAT NATURE 7 None j
I j
- 5. OTHER COMMENTS:
)
None I
h^
$5l~f?
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
I PAGE 0F 7
~
~TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Divisi:n ol G A Technolopes tnc.
PFR NO.:
AFFECTED ITEM:
2488i:019 Inck of AS!'E S~ c. for we'd vim PROJECT NO.: 2485 Au: rust 1,1983 Page of to Date issue y
Potential Finding Report Revision Summary
~
Purpose of issue /
Rev..ision Date Prepared by Sections Changed m.g. beg 8/1/83 M. O. Dunlap original Issue For A 2.n LM a
l l
)
(
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT v
2485:019 REVISION PFR NO.
~~~
A. PPEPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS-Wcld Wire 5/32" Dia. E 308-16 Heat 9183 Weld Wire 3/32" Dia. ER308 Heat 0039 (Ref. Single System Dws. M-535, Line No.1C502AB-10-1PC16)
RECUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
/GE Code Section III NB para. NB-2121 BASIC REQUIREMENT: Welding and brazing material used in the manufacture of items shall comply with an SFA specification....
Y i
p
- q W /.
~
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
Specification}for the subject weld wire could not be located; therefore, the chemical content could not be checked.
i USE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE. REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT.
8,/1103 D b-DATE PREPARED BY g
SIGNATURE:
DATE a
PAG b 0F
]
10
2485:019
~
B. REVIEWBY TASK LEADER PFR NO.
REVISION 4
O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY:
DATE:
o REASON (S):
f BY,: b"h O
O/I Y S f
ATE:
AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VALID O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY:
DATE:
REASON (S):
~
r.
/'
O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY:
DATE:
REASON (S):
O e
10 PAGE OF
(.
- - -.a -
z._.....
.FFRN5 M 485:0'19 - Rev.~=~~
~~]
4 l
C;. P.NEW BY ORIQNAL DESIGN CEGANIZATION PFR NO._ T'fr ~M REVISION ~
- d 7 JI tu f,.]
Di AG REE WITH TDTENTI AL FINDING STATEMENT s -
r :3 ili **/. GREE" BOX 15 CHECKED ABOVE U5E SPACE SELOW TC f ROVIDE b
b.:}
.ilNFDFMATION '.".H!CH WOULD BE USEFULTO THE FINDINGS f1EVIEW Q.}
~ C0YMITTEE IN CLASSIFYING Tl!E PDTENTIAL FINDING.
[A p4!SAGREEY.1TH l'OTENTIAL FIND!NG STATEMENT IUSE THE SPACE BEL OW TO' PriDVIDE ADDITIDNJ.L INFDhMATION THAT
[E:
ICLAh!FIES THE DISAGP.EEMENT WITH THE PDlENTI AL FINDING STATEMENT.
- p. !
'IN ADDITION,S' PPLY COPIES OF ANY DOCUMENTATIDN THAT SUFFDRTS
.e J
} Sf
!D!SAGMEMEN1.(USE ONTINUA110N PAGE FOR ADDtil0NAL5 FACE) f." ' '
kik
.BY:
e DATE: 0 9
- m. '
q i.
7' -
i s.
Jh
- i. COMMENTS
'. l. ~ ;
- 1..
e,,
. n.-
M';
O Veld Wire 5/32": diameter:E308-16 Eeat 9183.
3, iN.
- ~
+.*
t.
1'
{ p:. Packages JFC-S and 3PC-10 contain th'c back-up
- 7P-
,1,.
- ,3.
y4
);.h C:TTR froc Stoody. Coepany which identifies heat
,EI.
g k.f
?}
9153 as STA-5.4.
jl ih 4 d
. ft Thiz' finding against IFC-16 can be rectified by id i O '. heat 91S3 vithin the packsge.
7hl-placing a copy. of the CNTR from Stoo'dy Company d,y' il j'h --
ke t,'-
F3 1.J
)
v
-?
pd k
e o
g.
b.
tield' Wire - 3/32", diameter ER-308 Eestr 0039
- c.,5 i}
t p.js
-.i 4:
H!
j.'
Package ITC-16 containe' a back-up CMTR fro::.
- ').
.. &j.i.
- i
. j,
4.:b. hTRAB which identifies heat 0039/ report 79 638'
.hl., ;
' jj
.s T ns STA-5.9 ER-308 caterikl.
%)fif' i.'
.F
' il If-i
?..f.
Heat'0339 was not used in rockages IPC-8 and' i
W
$h jd IPC-10
- 3.;.
'[
j' h$
d.fl.....[. :.i u...-
.h
' l..
Ti l' j.
+7t y ;.
. },
'Q
. I l.:.
- t j..
-o 3( g,
l.
N i ;.
' '3 y
't
ll, '
.i
,M
.h,
f;L PAGE 4 of 10
e
.....,c
'%. 4.Y$Z N a $e.U': men.3 ns.$ e.
M G4$i. Lee 5...'.. & < Asks.ev. 0:
unah r.:.s.W naiW sM s ENS:e'. 4 ? o.. *.a. ns.iaS.'4 '.
,':.,,........._....._.'s':*
..__.l..
[0q-7 f,r.
, Y,c jj
( m so.
(
.y[cp 2 85 019 Rev. -
.. r
&s u
/;
w
/
PRODU.CT CERTIFICATION o p.b.,, s 4't.. f.
d
- Y**-
1(I (n.1 f
y g b/
e
.a Fepte:ber 14,
~..T zor Forge Piph stork J.
. D*
3 T l Paola', Kanssa M
'I~
2 1966-77 h.1 Certif. cation No 4
2 t
e pu s.
n..
i R,
4-J p _ l g.
3.:'s 2-
.a..
r..
3 ner p.
p:f go, 8-10694 f
- ltem No.
1-x:
m
~.
t o
- iS Product Name (1) 5/32" Stoody E)00-16_ Std3n.less E1cetrode.
L%.j /
14 w -G *?B ASMEj STA 5.4 to R.t c, f
{lU
. $pecificatior,
)
p r
J..... s
.s W
,d,
w.
( 35 f
[,.j
., ~ ~.
u if;;.J.
1b$
V
.t I' /
Stoody Order"t*o).(** 59'M2" #,.y(.
[',Teight 1000 1 is.-
$Q 9183 y
- 3,
?:
lyy
. *. 2.
k
$a
..'T.
f CHEMICAL ANALYSIS - PERCENT BY'WElGHT I..';-
r M,
' clust Chemical Analysis of Undiluted All Weidmetal Deposit m ';
i Jg..
g;
-(,
.,d C
Mrs i S4 Cr' NL-Mo Cb 8-Ta P
S
$o.44 19M4 9.57
<o.01 o.01 l
.o(
1.20 o.019
- o.ot:
e.,,
3
/
Cu F. 5.':
p, j y Co Y
U p.
[d IkO.03 0.05
< 0. O'1
<0. 01:
N.-$,N 4;.
y i
^
45
, ' ? '* *.
1'
" {- Y:te per Schsttfler Olegram 9%
+
y
'.b
%^
l Ve certify thsh the. above titerial -is in ecufor=suce with the applicab'le.
P
',4 '.(g
..y
.n
- t... p... :.
E2 requirements of Section III, Nuclear Power Plant.Cocponents' of the ASME-
.r -
...n F 4 *l
(-
+
l 4
.I
N,.1 Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,1974 E.dition.
Si p.
p o,j.i
- p 1
e
s.p l
cr n 3..-
5 INFOFIU.ATION !.
C s
p:
-l L'W LY l
8 p
.1 STOODY COMPANY p
s-(L).~ Q h
- 'd
.l
.c
- IA e
~
Frank L. Ordusy, Suped.*
,h Qttality. Acourance cor l
- C i.
r 4
e e
d.
F;
.PAGE 5 of 10
=
r
(.
. ND
.jl
'FR No. 2485[019 Rev.
I,;[
i r tre+ss:::,
s.
p'
. v. o. sce-
,a -
. -. =..
r,s.. c.,..cc m 1<
e c+.<
0, M ECM ANICAL., ST R Ee.';,.m....
a.a.
8_ /-cx c
i 9r N
' ty.u-I I
J:'bi'UMNR I ' "' \\*
S'L
.i c
-s c)
,$ s 9[{ ' o.
t o.
HE AT SYMBOL.
'.'AT M ir.L'I y C
.g
'4.'
r
/
$,.(.
cut.t.trlES 1 8 C N*
S N3 SPE';tFICA130i C I 1 I N' q
- r. :1 ys $..d
- i..
HEAT TREATMENT i8
., f,.
A
.y Mi
)
1' 3
9 6,._ -
,c e.
w
. e..
.m
.v. -
s e,
@.:l
.i-o.
A
.,; X.U.,.
TENSION TEST
't. ;
A,.
4 3
s
.n i.
i.
i,n, s.
i p ecaim en y es.so st a s NCe1H ULTs94 AT C T CriSILE L AC'.h 4-es t aur rst ma.
goggygow c, s:J
.e e virica,.o*
t em tm Uf"
"' A',5 ^
<
- a.v a r o t a"t""
'o ^ W-
.-1 3,,
- A tt t,.,61d l2.$S
'{stlO 7.3 3 %.
M i M s-37
-- D H
$.) l. r.'j.-
'4 s
,.s M,-H
.y c m i
g-i
-d
.t
,ps m.; ;.
c...
rs 4
a y
g
..:y.
[.7
' li.0 T!IT
!: : 5, -
2>
.M
- p,,.
s e., y m.,.. ',.
_.y
?
-ll ' j -" i
.j
CO.. S ',' 3h.
r.i
,.h *
.{.
j'fuy.{
! ')l.
y:
g
- ;p ('
2 F
.ia, Y
d.'
I:@END.TE, S.T CHARPY IMPACT TEST.tJ /N '
)
m.
1<
- a...
Q s
- c c e an w a.ii.s i..v a n a s s s ga r.eiacr uns.
yi4
. f;.:<.
It'l CN T 4.F I C. A,T e.f.*M
././. POOT FOUNOS 4
L e x.a usio n
- s. -to
.m.....
nm w u
t vt -
- w..
c o
e.
a(pb 8
i,
.\\
- .s
..w}".
p',!f w
n,
\\
),
y.
~
.y. FAIL t
t1 a
n.
<..v.
9 g.
, k,..
j:n l
R% fJfW[I
(
~
cy i g,t
'.'1 p
p t 3
,. i e
q' w}.. -[', 4 Y;'?,cf
?.
vesismo emacuarets Teistus otsan moost se Lencase vskocerv or unmusas so.s ev/sec.
v' e r rees.v e. c a. v.... rv.it...
~
v r.
4w.
t i
g.
c'f,'
.y.,.
g.y. i.
j COf.'!MENTS y..
- w'
.'.,'4 q' '., (.
. 't.,.t.
J.
't M.
g 5
s j
...,T F
.. s.
, pu. -
< sp,.
g. s,.
A 9,)
.a.
.' i g +. -
[.
' j..)
-;. ;.()p.p j r.,'if.
s/ 4.9 i 4,.
, i.@CD.ijhT:ON l.-@ ,M i t.u.<it.y a i,w .n { c s y t s.
- ,t -
g l' 'l + 'e ' j/ i .pm o. 3
- n..,..
5 (), p, I!.(f 'f . [#,f.:. . -T" zl.i O' TESTCO $YtDATE s s \\ einusstA.n.s.h D N. D A6 ~M 'O' c: wnn es r -p - . ;. 6. .1,: a. d. su'
- d
- a. :
..sp;. 4 aa.. ' u,q.. o . I. . s.........,..... P AG E 6 pf.10... ....i. ),.... [ l9
- z..
j 4 8,,.....,,,,...
- 4. :
i r
,--.p.
- g. - - -.c -- - -----+ -- 7 7,
.- gg {i. ?' PFR%. 248,5,:019 4'ev. h57S( n Skelly Dr.. Th, OkMem(. 4 2 4. Y^ 2 .J - ;. -.. ;*..;.: LM*.mATOR;SS CHEMIW & '.f.iECHM! CAL. U.ST.RE '1. i .'.1 g1 T,. 7 but.TCt.'. ;[t. W G# L Vlestcm ML:. Co'u 2ua~ W L"_.e.@ M CI6 13.11'G n-3i 1 3 'DA'E R"CS!VED W 6TICA N. = E N 2 s-79 '. a t_ m.0: 9.\\. .UA S.9 5U.0% . I u (.1.+ "SHIPP5ft flUMBER i,%TERIAL, TYP E f g biJAU. <. 3,. - K @-
- u. a t
? OR'.WID ST RESULTS TO: (t:AME & ADDRESS)' E F { ?, . W N tcher P.O. E m B Pcc 4 Kosm arm V c_.
- p C). I' c/ -
CHEMICAL' Ar.% Lysis. ,,9 ELEM:' f;TS TIJSTED
- :,4 M. SPECi.'AEN..-
L (D(NT4 NUf.*MW C 1 E' tAq l P _S _SI-L Cu Ni
- n. Cr i
- f.'3 M '~ i. p. 3 i l k !OCT 7.sb .031 i l 1.80 .007 .01 4 .79 .07 _ 10 f 9 _ m19.57V 17 ty1 (.,., CW. .,5.... . n... u a.., - y,5 t.... d, a. y: 6 r4 Ta Ti Al.. ' W s~a..OCT.79..,.:. ) .034 x. 7.022.. 4.,3. l..z 061
- -.037..s l.. w......
- .J...,. -,..., -.
W - S. n, . _ ~. = .'3 M...:/..W, Gt i,%. -i n. k... in...-& '*1.d.' u:. M. - h.- ' A. = .a. ..#...$k.,.. h.; i 3.4.'*P. .. ' ~^ CQ 7 ..u.. w...... a. ,,=.: e ',t' s2;7: ..o t. ; . w.. e .. r. ~ ~
- 9 3 :.n.esw m. :n.n ; ~ :~c
- .a
...v. :.:. n ' ' ' _:.}*'.t.s- ..v U..d. x m.. m.:a.;. ~a . -. + s. .w > ws.n-e..w..s..... n.. r.:. td..C H AN1C AL. T5.c.<.. a:.. .v:s <, .... s.3 : s .m.,-.u., s.n... s s.u w
- 1.. :. -
..:. - w V], . SPEC 1MENi.'. 'E=S O G 5) 7t'O N'. .'REDUCTICN,OF.. ARpA i.l!EL.D,W' 11STRENGTN ,UI.TIMATE STREt . N u t.w E R,.:. .. t h .r.s :..
- k. r a >. Y,9 ;. u :-m
- s
- t. ~r.
3 s.wy-}. (PSI) - x <r o w m..,...,. ' r .Y;"H,r.... ...... s:.. *, s..... v.~...,n-i, St....; e 4. k,... n >A.......
- s. r.
- a. :
r j. .s. ,z< ,3 .. -..........i,............ .,....r :
- s..n= '<- - '.'*...
r.
- s.........
= s.... .."*****.**.**PT**--***.i.-v.4.'*-'~**'~-*~n'd. a. ;. 4.h. v.. W .'; se - n .,n L .=n N 4I ..,q s..*W:*s*..u.,.,.i.s.A..s...t:: :........... c.,.. t. ![..r n s,(.d.. J=.. h....... .;.. a.. 4, i. ..r..',. *.n.c e .d...! . 3 ',. a..,..... t. ,d..a.t p... 4o.,.. O, f.a. d. 6. P*,,.e. ~ ? J U.. 4.*.e * *.J.. ..36...f.4.,. .a r..
- 3-e......v.
L ..A,c y.. l. g,..,e ..,...m,.6.,.,. e..
- w. s:..,,e..
.....-. 't. ye r e ... e.s f 4,T. 4 ...p
- v.,..
,s ~..R-y w. .s,...,..a.w; =.=~. 4, e ., ;e - s * ..r r.' t. .3 ,.,g,d -.~. 4 e. = s 3 .. v.s. < .a. 3 - T.j. i. ;.. ::.N a........ ...sA. + ~ s 4 a. u...,i....,.*,:.g..~.,, t 6. = 4.s..r.;e r 4.;. k. n r_... , " c e. . a.:... s. S 'Y. t 9... ..;.s g... ;,.% v. -e ..e. . rn.. m....- - ..s. ,.. & v r.e a.r s: *. .. ::r *s .....--.L,La.- ,..L, .re .. JJ- .r as .y l,. r ..b..a**. .m e.-.......-.p.<.e s.r..:..-.. 1
- a. a..
.6 w m. p.y...- -1... p4.,.. 3:,... wf ..6. tn... ,.4.,== mee.T iile.r.*s; s w.4w .m.. .. i, w 1 a.m o v c E. ..,..,,.,.u..c =- -1 s w e o.s e n a. . u. r - .,.. I-".,..ese,o... .m.4.., s,.e..s,e,==.,. -t .......e.e d ..t. v-.s,s s N :. s.ses*. **..- t 1e. m .=w*
- .u, ss
- g *
- A* b * - * *
.w..,e. , s __y em ~. .:r- . pus. Y 4
- r. ;; r _ _r.6.: %;. : w..v... a : n, L>.,... A'.r
,, m-. c.,.,:2 y J. ....J 4. s. ,.n, :.,.,:.). s..;; ;;c h. s.'lWwit*,...%' .s .J,,.,, ,p {,.. f - l '.*.9. mice.W;,,* - !-3.?'::" :!. g e.m Mer? rtsier.,t%.: *i ev.$,13c.hs,a m, 3 h ...*i 3,.,,.,,,, ......s f.- g w. p,.y;7
- g.,g,,,,
4....... % =:%* : L
- c.;; <.-- f.J.. 2. d rf= ~..
- ,84...........,.........
..st S=* ..-.J.~a*. t,,.
- .4
..........,
- I d". d I. '** 8 -
- =~ e re 5;,u.iMh*r/ w^*.-?'8 *** T"O y..* #*/ $.. er . :==d=* F.If;:,7.s". *t 6*
a w r..".. v., .u ;m;;%e, tis.....: t : ),.. . * 'a T %5.... h:.. t.. e, e s -.; ' , Ir#;9 ' 4:...:T*.N.t4.w!..... ...,.. df j<. -. u.,t,.' C. 6;W;h,,*h../(M.at.?, ?n.d..,A::=3,.,sM3I.'.,*bn.4.s..i.,;:Y,W ' re ,;v.,*,.......6 m.T +
- f.
,7.,#s w_%,. y7.'70,,.,.S"E.; ee t g.,, ,(?.. g. s,.. ,,q. ,,.r..a,.,, a r >4... .__v- ~ '.%..;,:u...: 8.,.. p n. **f, M 1. v.,.s :r.r.- T ;A..=3r.. .. : s. :.==.4.**.'.4.. e. . p.A,.,r, ;..,,,;;, L, M,,t, g g s f,;-. $ p. y t a .s..,...... a -,-.. v .i.. s.m s e-. _re-2 4 4 (.y, v...,H, r,.U g / A,.f n. v.i,.,:.R,,,,,.... _o.,. r. } ',, } r.. 0,G..W '... ~,i 2-P ss.*.* *. -....... J.a *. i. 6:. I..s._t,. p._, e.. an 4L., E.. -~ e
- - * * :.:..~. ;.. :.:.: *- ^ " ~ -. g.. w'. a.*
.c, es ...; '. a.,.: ',, n.. .,......t. -~.~4.'-.
- m,, an,
([41 .* s : =.: ~.; :.-- ~- . =.-. ;; -;- -.....m..: a .n. p. .: c:::r.c.::.? u..s
- wv., +. v.9 a..?.
- . :s.e. _.,n.rg a ry.', c,:..,
..,p...,.a. s. e..--*....r. '). j-.. .s,,..,,;,.,y,........3i.,, .....r.*.....T.t r f- :r t a.;:. e ? ..=
- ' *. t *
- r --- La!*
- ~.u
- :e-
.t. P..~, ...,. -.f,f-1 ?.t..4..
- s:e v...e.ai.. e c -=2.g.
}.. c. r. - ~ m.:.-~.**,,
- r.. c Av.... w.... 3 r; t A,
- ., 5 a..
?* . a ". e.. ' ',r*'."*T. .*... e. ' % - M* *.. .1 * *,% ',,,. ? .1 7. - s., *%.'.
- .. w-.
. W -- ::. M 4 */t.*t p. t' l 4: ~ ~ .g a.:.y. 'y (3 .....s.....,..a.,,!.,,..:. .L ..-.,.~,.. s,;.. ;...,. r.. $.4 .;. 3....... . v....,..,,. t s '(* .. V., /J -l. eraovne:ms 3 ., 2 e/.,. ~ ~~ _.s.,......,. n : f 3,,, .'~~ 3. -. -..s. _.. o. P. .. ~. a t.. .{ '. n /"),= .s% w t~ .e t ;., I i ). .f. t. ' s. 1 Uw ( PAGE 7 of 10 - 1 ,4 s
........... m,. ;,,_ -[PFRNo.2485:019 -~ - - - :-- y-e '9 -~3 p.. - e..iss i.e, neri REv.- < 4,W y e, N c ' N( '* ia?.. U emi
- 5. n, TAECHANICAL TEST REPO T ^
0E*7 . PJ 4<purrc>. ut - . I Jon e.s" m h f 5LO 9 - b (s,. Ns ..o.T sy,n ;t w,T r r,l At. YW D'"* 3
- D D.
S . h ).1 . CUAttFi!S_bCIE N..'o e ** i d O M. S + i * ** r 4 = SPFCtFt0ATION
- b..
Y.' s !; j HEAT TREATMENT ' sn -,J. 3 s;* ii tie c. 'U ,n,' M, i . n. r, . 3 m s w"h s . W., p. 8.g. TENSIO'N. TEST
- , s:J; :. ~
y.,o b.'d set ewen vett.o sTsetsw.T H V ut.t su u t vs N s e e.t C L O N G A* mes rsticwo=g, g,p g a t ro,,. t, s o. ,, r, e.,. e'^actea t.o a c
- 4 erio
.o "T' etP * - r * >.u = = - N)*d.:) At I u.lej e.( .M ' 51 a. 0 0 s-k o b 'i 'Y 3 / *1 *l 1 8 .' ' g.:. - + L' c y:R.,;. t.,
- 'm4:
'i:: 7.,,.. a ~- i:.m .a. 5 .xe. 1 4.1 .a ic-g . tip6 s..> Q5 { y
- 1..$ '
V .g e.
- W..
k{ ) S i 00 jj p- .e hM . j qL [, CHARPY IMPACT TEST. 'A//A
- yj,l BEND;TE'ST h.yl spe ?/.d. N.N.,u.o.,.
. roor ov as " ' " ' ^ " " * ' - t u u - '" * ^ " 'e s" ^ 5 ' ** * ' @a., ,. $r L s1<: c a n a sio n l
- .f f.f.'.
I [r 3 '? - .) ..a PA$$- n~;- y, ..a '.. 9. ' (. ig' ?<; Mall i n.:. '. w 2l W6 4N/A I I y W. .p j F. vases =s wacusaca v.uu oi.se n woosi. e.,s. ins an ves.ccir e or na= sas os. evenac.s~ .%i S., <.. P.. -"li spra eviva ans=<sv. rese er.stus. t p{!N.. .o- ~ Is>. { COMMENTS h ;..v- ~ %w 3' M sAv % dea, E.n. sow h s. " n " n o s e. L.k J d b. t_b # oe> 3 e r S-M , t.q r,v --.-.. -.g... 3 ~. L % /k i' i t' U g r [w.Td V, _. _, _, cP.j - )-
- r. -
g. 4. w v. n,. i su. s... 4-k j b+ 6 i s.. p a- ) ~~n g :< ~' h'- ~ 1L.. i' ^ E.3 -)1 .w C;r d I* i 7ESTED &Y/DATE hc s E: vtITNESS ( A M.f.l: ijl i .'p ' GJ, CdOfM D'-i.M ..m ss ~ 1 i q ,y. -v . p.. f;,,ia . g: + e..,.... e.. PAGE 8.of 10 g, s.:,i. .. ;c.
.._s. D. REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION ~ PFR NO. 2485:019 REVISION ~
RESPONSE
REVIEW BY TPT INITIATOR O AGREE WITH 000 -SEND TO FRC O ' AGREE WITH 000, REVISE G AGREE WITH 000 -INVALID O DISAGREEWITH ODO-SEND TO FRC (ATTACH RECORO OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT) COMMENT: The ODO located the required material certifications for we.ld wire heat Nos. 9183 and 0039. The material certifications were reviewed and found acceptable. A copy of the material certification for heat 9183 should be placed in package 1PC-16. M 0. b DATE: 8/12_ /AT BY: y i REVIEW BY THE TPTTASK LEADER ~ G AGREEWITH INITikTOR O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS) COMMENT: None l O BY: MM-8/IE/ DATE: v
- (
l g 9 g 10
E. RECOMMENDATION BY FINDINGS 2485:019 ~ REV!EW COMMITTEE PFR NO. REVISION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED t BY: DATE: DEFINITION: OADEQUATE .OlNADEQUATE VAll0ITY: O VALID OlNVALID CLASSIFICATION: O DBSERVATION OFINDING ' JUSTIFICATION CLASSIFICATION CRITERION NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON "0BSERVATION" O R " FINDING" CLASSIFICATION: l 9 BY: DATE: F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER O ACCEPT O REJECT BY: DATE: 10 10 -PAGE 0F -l ~-
-~ 7 - - - - - - - TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technologies Inc ) AFFECTEDITEM: Faintenance on Feedwater Ptu:p 2AFOlPB i. PFR NO. 2485:017 PROJECT NO.: ^ issue Date Page of 8 2485 8/1/83 7 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Date Prepared by 3,ctions C a d Th.g. 49 o,-J f 3/1/83 M. G. Dunlap Original Issue r' feIA-14-2.13 L[3
r; . POTENT!AL FINDING REPORT 'C 2485:017 REVISION ~ PFR NO. A. PREPAR ATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Nedwater Pump 2AIOlPB REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: ~ Storage & Maintenance Instruction Y 2758c-001, Revision 6, "In-place ~ storage" BASIC REQUIREMENT: In-place storage maintenance is to be performed at specified intervals. Such things as the visual inspection of the Shell VPI 260 Crystals and the rotation of the pump shart are to be performed quarterly. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: No documentation could be located to show that the quarterly maintenance on the subject pump had been perforYned as required. a' bIIM PREPARED BY M*O-3 DATE s 6 e a u USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT. ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING 8tEPORT. SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 0 F 8.__ ~_
~
- 8. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR fl0. 2485:017 REVISION
~ j O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE. REVIEW BY: DATE: ) REASON (S): 1 S d ~ BY: M O-DATE: b!#!O h AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VALID V O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING lS INVALID BY: DATE: REASON (S): ~ i i- ~ O OlSAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY:._ DATE: REASON (S): PAGE 3 op 8 r
Cl REVIEW BY ORIG!NAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. 24 % :017 REVISION ~ O AGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT 4 IF " AGREE" BOX IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPACE BELOW TO PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE flNDINGS REVIEW COMMITTEE IN CLASSIFYlNG THE POTENTIAL FINDING. DISAG REE WITH POTENTI AL FINDING STATEMENT USE THE SPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE ADDITIONALINFORMATION THAT CLARIFIES THE DISAGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT.* l-IN ADDITION, SUPPLY COPIES OF ANY DOCUMENTATION THAT SUPPORTS DISAGREEME yT.(USE CONTINUATION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) 'S N N DATE: BY: COMMENTS This potential finding suggests that documentation could not be located to substantiate that quarterly maintenance had been performed on the 2AF01PB pump. Attached you will find suppor-tive documentation which does exist.in the Records Management System. Apparently, some confusion existed at the time of the initial request where the appropriate documentation was not readily obt'ained. i o j 4 e e 4 PAGE 4 op 8
cuPJMSU C& W.3JLq.yc-NUCLE A{ TENERATING ST ATION JOSOR{ DATE: 06/15/83 JOB ORDER: 2AFM0045 _-_--____----__----_-_-__-_----_______-_____---_-_-_' AGE: MARSLE HILL , STATIOt.: r _ 7 - - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - - - _ _ _E C f SCHEDULED WEEK: 1933/25 F4 5.;UEnC Y : 213 RESPONSI3LE DEPT: M ,JOS TITLE: CHECK SURFACES, CRYSTALS AND ROTATE /IPM . PSI ECUIP. NC: 2/AF/Pv.P/00001/S SLL ECUIP. NO: 2AFOlPd LOCATION CODE: AB1920LM363 EQUIP. DESC: AUX FE:0 WATER PUM? 4B UP3D (({,3EDU(({}}},,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,P}{}}(({3,2,,,Q,fgg,'{]y,p,Q[gf,,,,,_,_, SAFETY CLASS: SAFETY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: CLEARANCE NU: NOT 1E1UIAE0 P R ERE QU IS I.T E S : 6 3.. E /- -24 R>TFvIT;94u?E7DITE----- RhP NO: NOT RE0JIRiJ ISTR REOUIRED: .N J CCI REOUIRED: NO INITIAL C ITIONS: Ni4t NATUntf>l_TE-~~~~~~ Agjg WLCG E FLM FERMIT RE7: NO SHIFT SUPERVISOR AUTHORIZATION: 0A NOT RE;UIREO LAST COMPLETE 0: / / GSN: TOTAL MAN-REM: REMARKS FROM LAST PERFORMANCE: csosooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo INSTRUCTIO15: 01315..... S M I Y-2750C-001 REV. 6 6-1-03 CHERNE 01 CHEC4 THAT EXTERitAL CAR 3DN STEEL MACHIf4ED SURFACES ARE COATED WITd SURFACd PRESERVATIVE. APPLY MOSILARdA 355 TO EXPOSED SURFACES. CHECKEC BY 02 VISUALLY CnE AE 3I55 CF IREEE vFT 255 ERYTTICI IRU AOD FRES.t CPYSTALS AS P.EQUIRt0 TO ATTAIN 1 LB. PEP. BAG. PEsFGJ.M A VISUAL CHECK OF EQUIPMENT INTERIOR WHEN BAGS ARE CHECKED Ad0 REPORT %NY UNACCEPTABLE CORROSION. CHECKED BY 03 ROTATE SHAET. -sE0XE TRIT TTER TI UICDUFEEU rsDR DTREX EQUIPMENT. REMOVE UPPER HALF OF SOTH THE INBOARD AND 00T-BOARD BEARING HOUSINGS. COAT THE BEARING HCUSING INTEsNAL S *J4 F A C E S, THE JOURNAL SudFACES, AND ALL OTH'R $UMFACc5 IN d THE SEARING HOUSING WITH MUSILARMA 522, 323, 524, Un 52.5. IlEPLACE THE BEARING HOUSING UPPER HALVES. RCTATE THe SHAFT 180 OEGREES. h ____-- CHECNEC 3Y CONTINUED ON NdXT FAGE FOR ltjpgNMATion opy, PAGE.5 of 8 8 4 O M
N - u>vtimu v F
- * ?,
r.UC LI A{ ',6N! il AT I G S T AT I CN J0;. gal {' , STi.TISP.! P OSLE i i t t. DATE: c,/15/23 JOB URDExt 2 A Fi40'Je,5 94.35* 2 ..s P ESP 07.S idi.0 05 P T : t'i.;H 3
- f. L CGulf. NO: 2A:01PS s
n A: 3,, _ _, _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _,., u z; : 0 0.00 wus.s a .- n rac; 3 J mu 3 Y : __.Lc:de.r_E ASSIG'JED TO: DATE: _ :./.A l/ 5 HJU4: m DATd: _f, _d.47_n OUR: 4_ 7_ :,194 CCM P L EIt-0 c -t
- eyn e> Rile __ _____
R64ARKgCy1J2 J.y2_j TJfilenO-__OcEl__J).p_T_1111M.C _6f.LI" _612EE1 Of.J1 LEO Tf 1;f.Ct_d g m _L f.Mth1L%._tMJfS_.I.obs.N.11L TRca G_t95.M22Q._sEdL% _aw: t.31E Lva!Als2_.112D_.l.4CG.O__L1GU;;._Qbl .TEF.e10.,G.r#auu. _re. steegaexe._tratg,, r_______ cae
- c. a.
____.__-__e ___e _,,.C I V,.. /g. _ TOTAL MA*l-REM 4c t 4.dO___________________,AILURE: APPROVAL: r-ERFEU7EE-~iOR"iERT'"~- gG rr------ PAY CODE: __~.04g H004s:_ 46c r FACE 6 of 8 e g g
r o-D. REVIEW OF ORIGlWAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION 2485:017 PFR NO. REVISION RE3PONSE - REVIEW BY TPT INITIATOR, O AGREEWITH ODO-SEND TO FRC O 'AG REE WITH 000 - REVISE AGREE WITH 000 a INVALID O DISAGREEWITH 000-SEND TO FRC (ATTACH RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT) COMMENT: The required maintenance documentation was, located and reviewed. The maintenance documentation meets the specified requirements and is adequate. BY: N 0 SWM3 DATE: 8 /11 / 8 3 U REVIEW BYTHE TPTTASK LEADER % AGREEWITH INITIATOR O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS) ~ COMMENT: None. \\ V gf/&[8.:I BY: DATE: / / PAGE 7 0F-8
e-e o, E. RECOMMEll0ATION BY FlfJulNGS REVIEW CO.\\1MITTEE PFR NO. 2485:017 REVISION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 1 8Y: DATE: DEFINITION: OADEQUATE OlNADEQUATE VAll0lTY: O VALID OlNVAllD CLASSIFICATION: D OBSERVATION O FINDING JUSTIFICATION CLASSIFICATION CRITERl0N NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON "0BSERVATION" OR " FINDING" CLASSIFICATION: p 4 e f t BY: DATE F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER O ACCEPT O REJECT BY: DATE: PAGE 8 DF 8
Ter a we.
- W, TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A DMsion of GA Technologies inc*
.m. Concrete Wall on Column Line #21 between ..s AFFECTEDITEM: Lines AA and Z at El. 417' to 433' of PuEiD.., I G. o PFR NO.: 2485:013.. ~ ~ a. PROJECT NO.: 2485 Issue Magg Bldg. l p, 1 .,, "'.4g7f h U-: r., . cec - July 27. 1983 fg . Ali M - l.l,-l'iji.) %. Potential Finding Report Revision Summary . u d.~ f.r gA N.e ^ Q r. q,s Purpose of issue / ,,..p. Rev. ion Date Prepared by Sections Changed 'T@ h'.
- A.
is u u,. n. [, h}/3 rWh Ir)'; ..X.x. j^ '.' N'.T h, 'k 7/27/83 R. Hsieh. Original .:.c w: . x,, ...h. "'*8[i9'
- j w,.(.*+
j8 .I y' f;;sj ' . 3 . "h r T.ytM.'A' 2 93.W s, v. ,t ;. c. jh,.Mi'..; .,w ... V., M. ? :.
- j q.
4.: .n 1v... . ~*j,
- ,.. w.
s. ' l.' 'r + $UW.2 ,ii- .,hk N-; ., t.R..;.s. t., ,:1...c o.:- . +. ./ .y y. ~4,'..
- =
. 2.: ,, ;s r +.' b . t. y +.
- ?,-e i,,s s
y La Z:. :
- d. -
t V. ' W i.*', t _..lP.- g y89. 4 ,5 ,. i i, J %3 .f. g-i, '{, *g l T '.
- ie s
- <g
.s g t.5J p A;p,'r h.y i '.S~,! I Fo/4-ft-243 2l ..y, L/4 .1-6..v ,m n .,.. c.. '...,,".",N..k....,.I [' ) 9'd' 9 'y 10 4. 3 l.N~rh-. m. .....~.o,m.[:w,.g.h, _n.,j,M' e u t j i ' a...C,..:t'.4.N ' ';.i.. 'c ?,' p. n '-l
- c', '> :.e i.
.'::a.,9. 4 i,s;. s. 'd M'.'"
- l
- e.....
.....p s.,., % r, d oola1r w U.* M w.r..a . s.., s. m'.e i*.l.,'. e ^,., s ;s.}k&W'4 'C.rG eg, j ...o e,*.a&.. e k _b; w l
.L'.. ,, n,. J s
- l y,.,,. m '
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT '2hk'.? % .ff, '3,,1 '.r.c. t .c +'. s. .c i;is .. - - ~. .. v. ..a 2485:013 REVISION s,$-[. ,m e er Q p PFR NO.
- wg g, 2'.
+,;c., ;., v. m, .a :.,g; A. PREPARATION BY TIT INITIATOR 'M v 'l AFFECTED ITEMS: 'js 5g'
- .:.y 4 Riel Handling Building Concrete Wall on Col. Line No. 21 between C :gg Line # AA and Z - Elevation 417' - 433'
.43,,..y1, '...._. ecs. w + .g g... .n..,. m./ vv.,.,1
- y, ;g
. w.. i.;. e.. .q .::p,q - REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: p,p. g @d; w(.. s.. nN.&,; (1) Newber$ MIB-19(4) - (4)' S&L Dwg. S-182 (Z) l 's. 4 f Jcu. .(2) ACI 310-71 (5) s&L Memo Title " Reinforcing steel...c A4 A .(3) s&L Dwg. s-497 (AM)
- 'Iblerances." DsN0114804002
...s.gg y{. NNE BASIC REQUlHEMENT:
- gg,yy..t N W' N N.
2 Y N 'E ' 'O" Np m$ > 7es "fgG Rebar Spacing 'Iblerance =,+ 2" (for 6" spacings) (Ref. 2, 5) .J.'. y @H., ' ~ .,NtQ sih x.: .?' mW mi .x yy Minimum c,oncrete coverage = 1",(+1/2" - 1/3 Specified coverage) (Ref. 2,3,5)_,;.; q Qf,Q, [ .' ' ' ~ ' ~'3 - lT.y); .'4 My.y-i
- 7 e
.. o e 4 ;,4 r,r th:U. ,.4:. ?. Qlx ura,;;%:.. .u.,: w m DESCRifil0N OF POTENTIAL FINDING: 2 p Review of 86 vertical rebar spacings. 8 were found to exceed the specified tolerance (See PH-056), but were less than twice the tolerance. Review of' 34 horizontal rebar coverages, one at elevation 417' had several locations 5,; '('d. in which the coverage was less than the minimum tolerance (PH-058). 'Ihe / length of rebar reviewed for coverage was approximately 20'.'(Note that the N M.. . ron-confomance report on this topic has not been found.) ?;. t.6., 0=. .V,' 1.jp +
- {y..;,&
y.. W USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE. REVIEW ACTION - ' c 4 7,; p s.:. o 4.*
- f. J/ij.
g,. 8Y INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL F NOING REPORT. g ,,, p,.< 3,;,g, q.g,g..,;. f' '(I @ ;'7 g,y g *Q, g- .;c g,. PREPARED BY DATE 1.. @;f, ~.. .w.h .,. : n. ..s..,9 . n:f-p o;,;',, W.f( ' l{s %) ' *4 W Rf ) +. .I.. .+. . g.. .,,Ll,; J},, j y 1 ., y v 4 .... W', j.'!. :Y s
- ~G ?
' r ;..? e;d ..:...,. y ::n. ~.. ng, p ,,,.i' Nih q' '.dr4g*' 'p',h' r, SIGNATURE: 'DATE ~. t 1 .. w,.s. v,,.w wm W. .c s, es m .s l T,.. rzgr l .. n. ....~,...,.s J
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE PFR NO. M94m3 REVISION .c . w.3 tnv,syp p : *mp..,s. c.p,,. -y, - g. sp'..-m-m - ,:,.x 7
- s L '.
PAGE No. t ... :(g.y'.?_.. e :!, r. . b e :4 y;:..,., t 4., 3.. G' ~ N kl.G.;y 4.. ;.., y
- , -+. s.'
',; +-
- 2. -F : l A'3 x.,..
. -.y, .,7,.,. 3} >y.. - 7: -,, g
- a. m. n.,,,..
n .c 4 ... q }: e: .s : ,-s ~y s M # g /d ,,e :;u. y;y.i.y 4, e, ~,,, .( s u -,v,,
- f,Mw.+...,,.. -
y t :q
- a..
.;L . y.e %p r.,. g }p : ~ &O d ~ n... .4. . g -,c, ~ ' u: .c 7 ...q.. 4.,c/ 4.. ~ r 6. ..n .A. - .?y .,y.. w s w.. ~ m$b?t?$.hA?$,.~., gb.mqb? ....~.w,,.. W2 w e ry p u y y;i'. $je-y, u v.n ~ [f w. p$ % g k y.i X },y
- 'Qf.;,p.fl..-
' ' +. y. g ' x .. y' ' ";k. #.fe t
- 3. % d
'D,. .L
- 73
- ., c;,e.t.;
f... f. y,. eg,. f 4 i he . c $, $ ' y..,, s. , 3~ ~. .., j.> " ,~'4 . m:..w.. m. - ..,.., ~. ~: g A s'.a g = w.; o; 4 w s u; ~ w
- e. :.,...
- u.. t; Q,).
.y y,,.n.w {3-u,.1 c; L. .y p.
- y. w.
y j PH-oS8 G-50/2) BY: DATE: BY: DATE: y 8 $47 a., .q.;sy.cyt,,w:,.,,h,,;fgg 1 ~ s.., 4 m.. - . %u,_..
- .'. vio.<-
PAGE 3 0F M #d]%'M M[b}$' M.
- 8. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR'NO. 2485:013 REVISION M
W . f. $..n .*. v . n.- 2,n s u REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE. REVIEW BY: DATE: ? 4 .a y .... o m .A.. r REASON (S): N-c.- s j J J ,v t s u
- ,c s
re j f - s- ..e .\\ 4 wi, ,. r i.~
- p
... t. .a. ASL [ N7//J 'J C' 5 AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING lS VALID BY.: DATE: m. e '., ....a n i AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: I t 'i,7,1 ~- 2 REASON (S): r.m. -o n e . t.: 1 1 1 4 ..,,/ 4 O OlSAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY: DATE: . V,. ) g,. l ',4 (* 1 " ') REASON (S): W-Y +.1. I [- . :.q '? : si x 8 1 t,,;
- a 4
he 3 . 'l y,, 4/..- .. f.,.2 t .v .?'p.;:i, rp l ... :. n. ..yg gi..@;q;~'.n.4:(.gy;3gg gg'. g= 4g @,e
- u..
.1 O...f.# t'A sundr$ ** d. g g g < g, s ;.\\ y e,4 g ,5 4 [
C. REVIEW BY ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. 2485:013 REVISION f-t 0 AGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT .je 4.c.h. IF " AGREE" 80X IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPACE BELOW TO PROVIDE I4 INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW J M COMMITTEE IN CLAS$1FYlNG THE POTENTIAL FINDING. f, O DISAGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT USE THE SPACE BELOW TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT CLARIFIES THE DISAGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT. J IN ADDITION, SUPPLY COPlES OF ANY DOCUMENTATION THATSUPPORTS DISAGREEMENT.(USE CONTINUATION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) _'q BY: DATE: COMMENTS . f' :
- l.h s l.
.ive s 3. .,,t. = .4. 1 [ '.';~ ~ > - e x s- . ' :s P , g,s u- .,i. t $a .;. f i ' Y. f ,.M . g.I.;f i \\ '; d ..,3 80 e)1 4 ,4 wc ?.. l
- b 4
l ?. ; ', 4, ~,...r.-l te .[;; j
- .c ' oj
,,..p<.," >, .3. . 3., l ,M. - i l h ;. r,:,l-Q .?y. . 8$.b i b.'.. "t
s TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A oi.i i.a t o A T.cnnaioni.iiae. x Ehbedded Plate on Unit #1 Contairment AFFECTED ITEM: Steel D2ne "O. [:. -- PFR NO.: 2485:010 4 July 27, 1983 - Pap 7 N ,j PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Date 4.' Potential Finding Report Revision Summary 7' Purpose of issue / Rev..ision Date Prepared by Sections Changed ch\\ e A 7/27/82 R.' Hsieh Include Photos in the Pac'kage p* = e t s 4 s 4 1 I#-e ) ^*N '. y" e h-e Q 4, e 4 t FwA-N-213 L,fG ~ l l ti, ." 4 j ~ .%... u;.. s;ye; .o _a . I .. f*fNfk'?;,' o
- s.,.y 0.'
Y'.Y . $Yl,'?Y.Im'.hh.'s 't' f.~'.'G..lLpo ;); -J . m ~,,. :n
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT U d? Ai f.*. - PFR NO. N85:010 REVISION =.. 4 v.% .y 13 4., A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR .Ac 4 AFFECTED ITEMS: 'Ihe steel embedded plates in Unit #1 containment steel' dcme will be affected due to the deficiency of the welded studs on these plates as identified in this PFR. REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: s ~ a.n. .(1). S-938(M) ~ (2) S-497(AM) 3 i h ". BASIC REQUIREMENT: P' .;c w Dwg. 3-938(M) specifies the require,i number, diameter and length of welded ( l studs on the irxlividual embedded plate on Unit #1 containment steel dome..L'^ In some cases these welded studs were bent more then 15 (with the vertical position), Noto #59 on DWO S 497(AM) gives requirements of acceptability ' .foi. these defected studs. \\ va, ..v:wa ' w...< u DESCRIPfl0N OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Se conditions of the weld studs on the embedded plates on Unit #1 contairment steel dcrae are described in Walkdown PKO. #1-SO49, and are sketched in Page 3 'Ihe deficiency of these welded studs included: missing studs, missing stud head, studs bent more than 150 (maximum allowed by Note #58 of Dwg. 3-497(AM) without correction).
- p USE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FIN 0 LNG REPORT.
.;p'i PREPARED BY OATE ..a M' I s ' 7?: ! k ,.n 4 r. ..u ?' ,~tg* e $ **" ~.
- M,* *p l 2
-?' u o .,$aQ' W} ' a, jh * .?T. SIONATURE: DATE 'y Q t* \\ ,,m.,... s....n,i y 's *,
- .W.4*,%mye
'r gg s-g. A p *
- re#tus - l
,,,A y *94t as ag . 8a M,, t * ' $cy,p .g p. g , y (,Q f#g g# [ p, hko,v,.(k]*,' M ",1.',
- k fW5Y}"/;h Y}*$*
. e.~. u :,.m w c .... w.,., y.=~,.w a. :u. r aa...su. r.~ w a ww="..~ s -
r ya n N9,- n. 5-a w p.. y 3 .y , n, t q m gpD Q N ~ r> M Q k[ L N' 'R Lb5'-9~~0 =.256' : - fm y 5 n. ns 5-9}scu)cfuab FsR 9-%"b7"(b" C);'3.) ? ~ k ~' waixpown AcruAt ; 7- %'4x 7',iawow.w rests 2 t
- . T.
n Q p,4 sat l ; STUDS BENT Mote TNas /S* (SEE M0To N-640) ) o N=. b V Qgt. N '3o
- c..
f;n=s s-I'-18'; g z45'-ts' ,s >1 ~A %i %g R 5 e, g 3- .O z t s .mexpown scrusL ; 6-144 x 7,*inwgiat gwo-raen a X '} . STUDS BENT MORE TNAM /5*[SEG Moro PH-l m y ,g g -t m u / \\ = zs'-4, G = 25s'-30' G i n / ows s-93s<m> causs for 7-%"# x7'Cber s) y 9 was.xbown. Acrast.; 6-u'.ps g*, z-fgf ay j' G j y ' AND TUME Stun STEMS (wirdoar MUDS). TxttE 0); y; n ne e' Lons stups wees so'T MofE THM15* y y 9 Csse Phoro PA-d3D f a t o,- /, 't W. R=19'-3' 0 = 270 ' i ,n Q I Dwn $-93s(M) csues AR 4-t'#xsh,'(oF[f ):' 3 y, 4 -b WALkDOWN ACTUAL,' TWO SfuD SffsfS (WirdgufHM; >g = 2 E \\ P 3 \\ {. bg; R= /3'-0, ^Gs 257' u a y 9 DN4 5-93S(M) causo Re 9 3 '4x7'(DET 3) k 4 y \\ \\\\t WAtkbOWN ACTUAL; 7-%'St7*37u% mwHiof ^ e y 3 C H m CNG SND WAS BEUTM!CE THan 15'(SGGAV9h5 0 lh '\\\\ a m c; e
- z,,
2 g m- .p. 9 .E: 7'o ; 9
- 270 s
g e .i e - g; 8 'l ' QDws.-s-9sscui caufD Fee 4-Jg'4 erk'9Tuos ~- 1 gu s gk N r
- kwsixcown scrust ; 7 ease ec in r.oaa ' '
m '; Q.:. . h
- ^33Q]s7upsxec s!*T Moes TH44 /5'.g e
N 5 ~.s h
- t*.CSG6 PNTe PH-e36 ).
y Q f.f$O
- $f. of bwh S 'M7 (AM) 4*GtYB00MEM&RRhCCEf742UTf WHN TWE a
. %t r..:.
- )wuo 5_
_.,.,._ isinuos.wm acar Moes TH*t'5,9 A""arLYh wseka*ueme"n"'*R ^*W>j.N _,y* ~ ' .m..., i .t
- n r.m -"
n .x f f. ; aq & e-, d'
- 5 b
f r. s
i ... y w.es t
- ... qd e,.,..
- 8. REVIEW 8Y TASK LEADER 4
PFR NO. 2485:010 REVISION ... e m m. n+ .<m:; y s.~n p u,..<.,. ,m ' m'AyJ.s +.. .n . c.. :.u ' A d rNit W,.*4 W c.w * "e. sa..- ' W,I 't' O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE. REVIEW BY: DATE: .c.w. e::qG !.:
- x. p.
.a.<. 6 q1) u + r. .+ .. v.4 y .m ~:.. - s... q,. ep ..y. O REASON (S): . %'4 t* (.ep .u... q:~.L..})l, .y.;% q;- .,.u :.; : .,c, :. .., a. i ~ p.. n. - .q. 59, ~...... t. s.: a. ..g .4,s o ; .a....:
- w.. _
u. A g;.h;.r..t- ...W.+:; :.w y. v.,..~. ' 1., -. ; m; m.
- . m. ?
Rj %'......, kp.;..!. c.4 '.H.:;Q ' :. :,a. D ~ '" P
- }
%.J. ? ' / VR\\.' h N.if.Th?. s AKQ.~- 'NQ;,')Mfen.G.fi'iGn f;W f2h - . U..? ,.::b & $ d'% %-1 $nt! n c. Ab. r. ns :&,s;O;.: Wr ?: ' ~. n u a i, s
- ,.. ~.
w(I AGi' b [0k..khl L FIN. DING IS VAk.10 [.' 8V: b
- o. AT. E,:D ATE:%.3.x,,,<
. g.L, h, .c.. ,._s... , e.3..- . i AGREE POT.E.NTIAL FINDING IS INVALID BY:- ...L.i. tJj .a x.. n . nn ,e' -- L.e.m.1 .r REAS. O N(S,):,,',t..* - 42. .%I ..,4, r f ~. ~ ny;. m.. .n y. w . u,p .e a
- pp:.
. @.v.; w 6;,. e - ... 5 o.w,,... . ;,; ;..,:.,.. y ;. 5 g);jg qg wa-u. r., ... ;... - : ;5., .pg..:. -
- m...
.s.1. _ g y\\ .a .g.L
- A
. o..v.n. . ~ >t u 1 W g s.r. W,wcJ.u,ec, crc.w. arm'n4r.% 4-i W. 6 O.m e v. .$ r c. ,.g U
- 3..< * *.
y .y.. .tg:, o .e ' f.,41 s'. ' O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: .%s .j;
- g. ;.
- e. R:
,7 u...;.;;
- ,y
.:r. ;g.f..,, ....,, a,. n ;g p:ts ~, S* ',%,9.: t REASON (S): , o. ,qy y$ ~ ... ~,..$. n.' t.' m .;... ; r.. - m,... a ,q .r 3,4. 3 ,,. g. d# *.* l (.%. @{.
- 85,. 7 9.@f...,..Q.y. _ J
.,4. :. .y 1.*,. a e;; m. r .;: n v.w e. O ~ mi&.. %. t.3%...&#.. W:M. +.wni.n. %?<:k.,s...;,.w.m~p)n.,fprfw.h.mg u. w9 ..p,.. p*...,, .a *M4* koMMkNM f. . !,",$
- O A b C f.
4 C h. I . C,
POTENTIAL. FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE gg,, g / g REVISION .v]k i
- M4' h~
9 - + ' '. +.w.4+.e >ep:45,. y 4 u Pace N0 m (
- >,[, "'
9..[y e.g, ,l 4 4 4- ^ .,jg, e., s: 1 ^' m +.;.. .i y g a ' i + n gm A. L ? . p.Wh,Ms@QG@ER i . ;.k d Q7. q;'. bW:
- F ll p; e
,. r ryp '. i ' t' .. w. f h.k, A h 9 + y 't) g' ,d q.+ w s gth ...,'s.4*% ge.* Q -
- p!
a 1 ~. r- ( -, { ^ ..,p. k ' - p' )' g 5 g-v. v
- r..
y J. f
- 5 9-f.*,
l, f ll . ) c.. 4 r.A}.>;:9.s$thf,.,%i. 9. Q W M... j 1 l @, , p. .gs. 4 - ,- y. og ~- , v p' u ,b b $ .J ; Y +h* ~,: { 'j?;
==
- w. wee w:
- /.y
- y h, 3!
@ t # 2 h 6 % % '$ ff &.C*lilie f, & t. h Lj ' Mr*i f M, -t - L. M.f Q... j., " [. ' _. !: l. I ~ gr n ^. ,.1 d.' . [%.g )' L. L : f. : : : J .y .~ ,p ef *;,; W . 'z h f.. ,q ,q% a.. ;; -
- m; A p ?~M. N s.
.y... .,y s
- J.50 V1
< kp ; y p, r.: n ..v. .n 4 L g g,3 q,3 i.w 4s , {s %. - Q* A k
- s. f,7 !_ %Q,
's_.: -y 7;..f:&.7 g m.+ ~ 9 g; u. m m; - .7* .w \\.. H.s c h $w:**-Soh' ~ krN... % 's l t l .:K,.... :.1by., < _ 1.t a.& u-a-
- k. M 4
- 7 /'P 3 0 ATE ev.
.eese qu> BY DATE. a s. . :. p or.M. *. f e View *. r*Po h4a o. -, se. 41 sr g4 ~ SQ '
- [,.*.[MV,;,
PAGE OF QQtd,[,{QM (f, 3
t POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE ygg.g /O f .. j.y Q PAGE NO. rl J ..p ,(. .w M. 2 f.. g%,.%s .. A . y.c r . a. r t 's s M *yyy*
- n. *t g' fl^h,
'1-i; "g. [ ~ . ;,,- 5., eg iy ~ i. m [' 7: f) a k 'g'g\\ 3 I..'*d #',Q ? i df - P 1:*
- '" ' ' "~g I
' y. ,4 'y4. .'3 f g;}I, k-
- h. -
jl f e 4,,. ' 4k;...,*. 4: l /*g _ g; t m ,) ,r, p ,g,1+ J 22. h4.' ~ ) .p
- 4. -.
','i1;&TQ?MaXt. i Y:. R ; M & &,, y .s ~&v ^ & $T-n b W .2.> .. &> ' \\ 6, . - ~ ' 'A $) ; * (;*% 3., _Y
- g :' :r-ly;.
y, ffa,, f. *l. l A ( k
- o $. ?,f..l k,R '. rp ','Y. ~,..
[ .4. t. '5'. 6. g i ~ ' Q '.. ' * * ' ', Anti, .y-a 44 ;me
- y.,
g o'.tR hs he* 'b f, l. Y d h 'h* jf k f ' rN W 3ll' 5 % % i.5 % MMIEWWbR%$ WORM $ V/p/$r
- W'/L,$o y ^ y.%% 4-lt&W '
.i, 4
- 7, M,G.g,-6p</,G pgd'$0.'
N .. 1 un. ,, ~.e a a %,ww y;s.g , ~. a.u -.a r . i.. m. 3 ~. p. -; o s. l .i M. t,. w I gy DATE-p . " ' -O' i By DATE: ,,Y
- V
'P es, t' *8 e f ' ('
- 4*/f(4 *
}3' ....,.ew,.. ,. nn & or 4 va c ampsMtiFdgaW W d em.
6 ,I; TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A oivi.ioa. a A 1 na. o i ia.. s .q AFFECTEDITEM: of Contairment Building Unit #1 & 2'Ibndon 'ff 4 PFR NO.: 2485:014 M Issue Date Page of '" N PROJECT NO.: 2485 July 27, 1983 1 + 4 c:;: y ?J Potential Finding Report Revision Summary y) 4 .s a Purpose of lisuel Revm..on Date Prepared by Sections Changed S S)
- f.-
^' k.hd . 9 7/27/83 R. II:'ich Origim1 Issuo ,n ,a Al
- a.. n..
c.. .l4 . It'.* ~ .:i.d 6. .. ;"l y;,n ' 'l-) h[,s' Ah
- ,t.
4 )* p, +4 ne.
- Sf
.n .u 31 ~, m. 2.,4 s'. Fo/A-Sv a93
- 3..,
j ( > Lf6
- l 1
.,..c n ',,C-
- S..
r. N 's. ,,t;j sr a
- ,y e
. '.t ..,,..,1.. n f ':,, o,.s. < * .t w; ~ ,,.4,,,,,, pg f g, 3,g.g,,p s g r p Yh.$h'ih((hh[
- [ $ki $ "c
'3[id.hhk$kNhM[ 't ~
4 g . POTENTIAL FIN 0thfi REPORT i k' \\ PFR NO. 2485:014 k REVISION y,, '.m IK, y; ' 4 A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR V. 1 AFFECTED ITEMS: 3p: 1 % e horizontal Tendon Anchor Plates on the buttress in contain wnt Unit /3 Nos.1 and 2 are undersized. 4 p M 2 REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: J..,' (1) 186W50(Rev.p) (Sketch by Inland'Ryerson Construction Products Co., h Post Tensioning Division) Tr y,. ) SASIC REQUIREMENT: ' ' '.i. 45 7, 1-et of 4' 2e horizontal Tendon Anchor Plate size shown in Ref. (1) is 2 +1 21 (+1/4-1/1 x 3h" ~ ' i. y j rd DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDINO: i %e horizontal hndon Anchor Plate actual size is 2^ " x 20 " x 3-3/4" l ~ j j ~,$ y USE SPACF BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE. REVIEW ACTION 4 j; .s SY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDINQ REPORT. O., k' h*' /i 7k7/ff k PREPARED BY DATE .g.V ,s
- ,, y
.f t s .e, (. 4 i 4 ,. s.71 ' d; , x.,.t .cg 1 -..~. ..cr...;s;7; v ~ w %~ SIONATURE: DATE ~ m...,,..,oa.. . ),'z s OY 2 i3 M.5,-[.I, hgh h h; ff ,[$,i *
- ), J.
8 s ....... ~ -. ~
e l s %.c. 1
- 8. REVIEWBYTASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:014 REVISION fj', l w,
w A l e
- 2; R i
a REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: .? a 6 v f.. f \\ i REASON (S): 3.:. ~ .,u .i, y, -/ Y 7f7/g3 1 A*' Utl AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllo 8_Y,: DATE: ...., ' # w,, 4 f,pai' .6 O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: i REASON (S): Te ~'i' .,a
- p gg u
A}s 4 we d .A .s e.
- c 0 DISAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY:
DATE: 3 ?. '~, .n i ';t 1$ .?,- REASON (S): Q '4*, i s-U b ..1 .,*6 ,. '
- m e'
. s.,.:. g n. = q
- s-,
j,l. .l,,,. L* :q. $j a g* ).,l? b;- s* . ',. * ?
- F.;1 ^ g. ' '(,,*,v h
- n
. d. ,f Y e. . **p. t, <cy+ - %,, s, ',. ;,, :,.. , 4, Jf<. g,:., 74, > ,4 ,,,,, p qj .., ;;, 'n * ;..,,op. xq,: Q,,, ;,, _,,,
- e ' k t,$ %+: ;. ; -%.
- ;,, yy op, yy
,4,ygy y gfn4gg(Qg,3, p !s.* ^
e C. REVIEW BY ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. 2485:014 REVISION .f. O AGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT riN ~lF" AGREE" BOX IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW 9 COMMITTEE IN CLASSIFYING THE POTENTIAL FINDING. O DISAGRE. E WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT .a.. USE THE SPACE BELOW TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT .h CLARIFIES THE DISAGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT. N I IN ADDITION, SUPPLY COPIES OF ANY DOCUMENTATION THATSUPPORTS .2 OlSAGREEMENT.(USE CONTINUATION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) Jr r. BY: DATE: COMMENTS '.(} -T; i 't's e, s-d g g g Y,3_ j . _..c. i O ,. ~,9 -S L,l;; ' se f .. g ). Q l .I 0 e
- 5
?.*lg P 4 l l / 4 g 4 .m, d Ok 4 .s k gyp g 37 9 ..y.l). f, i j f4 'w \\i kee,
- p. **,
b a . :i,:._. 5.g fy AGE {,,y, , j [g]p rih k, h)f h ~ ,c v +-
<uvrs' 7 j TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technologies Inc. . s. AFFECTEDITEM: Auxiliary Building Roof, Structural Steel PFR NO,: 485: 2 009 F aminz. Cohen Beam Connection t PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue A Date July 26, 1983 Page 1 Of Potential Finding Report Revision Summary urp se of Issus/ Revision Date Prepared by Sections Changed 7/26/83 F. Lin [v Original Issue b f a f FoIA-se413 L/7 t k
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:009 REVISION A. PREPAR ATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Column to beam connection of Auxiliary Bailding roof Structural Steel framing. At Column 17, Line V.9 REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Drawing S 481 BASIC REQUIREMENT: Detail T 4 of Drwg. S 481 shows the following requirements:
- 1) Fillet welding is required all around the connection boundary between 3/4 in. cover plate and column.
- 2) Two 3/8 in, minimum thickness stiffener plates are required at each face of the cantilever beam web, directly above the supporting flanges.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
- 1) 'Ihere is no fillet welding at the connection boundary between 3/4 in.
cover plate and column. Instead, two LS_4x4x3/8 with six 3/4 in. diameter bolts were used to connect the 3/4 in. cover plate and column. (See photos PH-012 thru PH-17).
- 2) Two 3/8 in. ndnimum thickness stiffener plates were missing at each face.
of the cantilever beam web. (See photos PH-012 thru PH-017 of Package No. 1-S009). IlSE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. PREPARED BY d' DATE 7 ~ M - 83 7 "7 SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE-.iLOF
( B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2425:009 REVISION O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): g AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VALID BY: DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVALID. BY: DATE: REASONIS): i O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): pans.3 nF =
- -4.
s s TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A DNision of GA Tednologies Inc. PFR NO.: 2485:016 AFFECTED ITEM: Valve uW Incorporation - Generic 2485 7/26/83 Page 1 . of PROJECT NO.: Ime Date Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Purpose of issue / Revision Date Prepared bY Sections Changed ddh&s \\ 7/26/83 D. C. Found Original I i i t .t 1 Fo/A-w-233 e/, ~
l i . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT 1-PFR NO.2485:016 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TFT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Valves 1CC9470 B 1CC9459 A 1CC9458 1CC9459 B OCC9465 0CC9461 1CC9470 A 1CC9487 L 1CC9467 A 1CC9488 D 1CC9467 B 2CC9504 B REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: M-537-1 (L) W Ietter to PSI - PBJ 2.1.126 -PSI Memo PER-1618-83 M-537-3 (N) M-537 4(P) Spec. Y-2702 BASIC REQUIREMENT: Valves to be furnished per Spec. Y-2702 & Eng. Drwgs. 88900, 88889, 88910 & 88444. Accepted Management Control pw.ctice is to approve and accept changes prior to incorporation by suppliers. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Valves furnished per Eng. Drwgs. 83901, 83815, 83901, & 83413 Spec. Y-2702 changed to W proposed changes. PSI has not accepted proposed change. Quantity of valves involved & trend indicated by change processing time period. USE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTlAL FINDING REPORT. PREPARED BY 4 DATE SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 0F {
f 's,. B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:016 REVISION O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE-REASON (S): M AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY: DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): ^ j a' O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: 1 REASON (S):
9 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technilogies Inc. t AFFECTEDITEM: PFR NO.: 2485:011 PSI MRIAGDENT AUDITS Date.ncy 25, 1933 Pege 1 of PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue 4 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Data Prepared by 3,c ions Chang d mg p 5.B. 7/25/83 S. Bresnick origimi i i e 4 9 1 Feta-1+-295 L/1 l b m n,.. -. -. -,. - - - - -, ~..
l J.,a ~ . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT 2485-011 PFR NO. REVISION ~ A. PREPARATION BY TFT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Management Audits of QA Program (e.g.: NUS #3950, 82-MGMNTAUD-02) REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
- 1) 10CFR50, Appendix B, Section 2
- 2) PSI PQAM, Section 2.3.10.1 BASIC REQUIREMENT:
- 1) "The applicant shall regularly review the status and adequacy of the quality 1
assurance program"
- 2) "... audit which assesses. the effectiveness of the QA Program to assure that the program is meaningful; effectively complies with applicable Codes Standards, j
and Regulatory Guides; and effectively implements all elements of the QA Program as stated ir. the QA Manual." DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Although management audits have been performed annually as required, a review of some reports (NUS #3950, and 82-MGMNTAUD-02) showed.that the audits were limited to evaluation of implementation of the QA program. The audit did not include the ~ following items required by Reference #2, and impl.ied by Reference #1. ~ a) Effectiveness of program to assure it is meaningful. b) Compliance with applicable ~ Codes', Standards, and Regulatory Guides. USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THI OTE AL FINDING REPORT. PREPARED BY DATE SIGNATURE: DATE ' 2 PAGE 0F
t. i B. REVIEW BYTASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:011 REVISION O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: j REASON (S): c. r 7,b!O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY.: O-MM> DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVALID BY: DATE: REASON (S): L-U F 0 DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASOP((S): ~ oan, 3 6,
/0 l ? TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technologies Inc. PFR NO.: AFFECTED ITEM: Motor Operated Gate Valve 2485:015 1RH611 PROJECT NO.: 7 g issue Date Page of y agq Potential Finding Report Revision Summary 9 urp se of issue / Revision Date - Prepared by Sections Changed hffYe 7/25/83 D. C. Found 1 1 i FesA-ft 41s q.. B 'O b
l t . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT 4 PFR NO. 2485:015 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: bbtor Operated Gate Valve 1RH611 REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: M-538-2 (T) W Deviation Notice #022020 Spec. Y-2702 Vol. 6-1, Tab. 17, Page 4 Fl43D29(4) 8372D26(-) QR 58783 & 58798 BASIC REQUIREMENT: 3600 RPM. M01EH611 per Drawing 8372D26 requires motor with 2600t RIK. Per QR 58783 & 58798 M01RH611 has Serial Number 0055 or 0056. Per W DN 022020 Valve Drawing No. is 9743D29 (4). DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Valve Designated 1RH611 has motor with 1700 RPM. Valve Designated 1RH611 has Serial #0054 PSI has no Drawing 9743D29(4) in file Spec. Y-2702 not current for Valve Drawing Number Per DN #022020. USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE-REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON IS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. PREPARED BY 4 DATE SIGNATURE: DATE ~ PAGE 9 0F
I B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. obog:n15 REVISION g O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): ) Elf AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY: DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING iS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): i oane 3 ne
// 5 .e, L TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Okision of GA Tuhn*@s Inc. t AFFECTEDITER PFR NO.: 2485:012 Fine Aggregate for Concrete-Date 7-22-83 Page 1 of PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Date Prepared by 3,"ctions Chaed + 7/22/83 V. Nicolayeff Original Issue I 1 Fot A-St-zi3 L/n i
l 4 . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT i f PFR NO. 2485:012 REVISION A. PREPAR ATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Fine Aggregate for Category I Concrete and All Concrete Placed in Category I Structures Since 1978 'N REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Sargent & Inndy Specification Y-2722 Amendment 20, 4/4/83 " Concrete Structures and Site Work" BASIC REQUIREMENT: Page 4-12 Paragraph 205.2a1 of Y-2722, Requires perfomance of AS'IM C 295, " Petrographic Examination of Aggregates for Concrete" for each source and type of aggregate proposed for use. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Petrographic Examination for Fine Aggregate Used in Category I Concrete was not available. Note: Source of fine aggregate is E. T. Slider, Inc., Jeffersonville, Indiana. USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. O PREPARED BY O DATE SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 0F
~
- POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE PFR NO. 9hom.m 9 REVISION PAGE N0.
Additional Information 1. Report from Peabody Testing Services dated 11/29/76 % rble Hill Generating Station Units 1 and 2, PO#1086-89Q Initial Testing of Concrete Materials" indicates Petrographic Examination was performed on: a. Fine Aggregate: Scott County Stone Co. Intersection of SR 56 and SR 203 South South Scottsburg, Indiana sN b. Coarse Aggregate: Scott County Stone Co. (Same address as fine aggregate) 2. QC Records at Newberg indicate: No fine aggregatie was purchased fram Scott County Stone a. except for a test sample, b. All coarse aggregate for production was purchased fram Scott County Stone. c. All fine aggregate for production was purchased frcm E. T. Slider, Inc., Jeffersonville, Indiana, d. No Petrographic Report on fine aggregate from E. T. Slider was available. 1 b /! BY: DATE: BY: DATE: PAGE 7 0F
( B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:012 REVISION 3, O REQUESTINITikTOR TO RE-REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): 7,/2 2,/A3 AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAll0 BY: M O-DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVALID BY: DATE: REASON (S): i ~. - g 1 O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (Sh rycip 4 (iT3 s
/L 7 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technologies inc. AFFECTEDITEM: PFR NO.: 2485:012 Fine Aggregate for Concrete PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Date 7-22-83 Page 1 of Potential Finding Report Revision Summary J Purpose of issue / R ev..ision Date Prepared by Sections Changed i ./A. 7/22/83 V. Nicolayerf Original Issue i b 9 O I t Fora-M-2.is 1._/'s 2.
M . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT b ( PFR NO. 2485:012 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Fine Aggregate for Category I Concrete and All Concrete Placed in Category I Structures Since 1978 REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Sargent & Inndy Specification Y-2722 Amendment 20, 4/4/83 " Concrete Structures and Site Work" l BASIC REQUIREMENT: Page 4-12 Paragraph 205.2a1 of Y-2722, Requires perfomance of AS'IM C 295, " Petrographic Examination of Aggregates for Concrete" for each source and type of aggregate proposed for use.
- O DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
Petrographic Examination for Fine Aggregate Used in Category I Concrete 4 was not available. Note: Source of fine aggregate is E. T. Slider, Inc., Jeffersonville, Indiana, a I USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. PREPARED BY DATE i ~ SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 op
m POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE PFR NO 9 hog.m7 REVISION 1 I PAGE NO. Additional Infomation 1. Report from Peabody Testing Services dated 11/29/76 "Parble Hill Generating Station Units 1 and 2, PO#1086-89Q Initial Testing of Concrete Materials" indicates Petrographic Examination was performed on: i a. Fine Aggregate: Scott County Stone Co. Intersection of SR 56 and SR 203 South South Scottsburg, Indiana b. Coarse Aggregate: Scott County Stone Co. (Same address as fine aggregate) 2. QC Records at Newberg indicate: a. Ib fine aggregatie was purchased from Scott County Stone except for a test rample. b. All coarse aggregate for production was purchased from Scott County Stone. c. All fine aggregate for production was purchased frcra E. T. Slider, Inc., Jeffersonville, Indiana. d. Ib Petrographic Report on fine aggregate from E. T. Slider was available. I bdb BY: DATE: ( BY: DATE: ( PAGE 3 0F
g. B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:012 REVISION i i O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: i P7 < SON (S): 7,/2 2,/A3, AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAll0 B_Y: M O-DATE: g O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): .a
- O h
l O DISAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY: DATE: i REASON (S): (~ v',E 4 2 papp op
(: '7 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY , A Division of GA Techn:logies Inc. I. PFR NO.: AFFECTEDITEM: Pipe Support 1CC03052R 2485:007 PROJECT NO.: Issue Date Page of 8 2485 July 21, 1983 y Potential Finding Report Revi; ion Summary Purpose of issue / R ev..isien Dste Prepared by . Sections Changed 7/21/83 F. Urias Original Issue D.Ub11oringj, O 4 = 9 / F0/A-f4493 Llo3 \\. a
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT 2485:007 REVISION PFR NO. A. PREPARAT10N BY TPT INITIATO R AFFECTED ITEMS: Pipe Support 1CC03052R REQUl8iEMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: h Pt M-537-2 (L) M-1CC03052R(B). M-19, Sheet 4A, Rev. C BASIC REQUIREMENT: Hanger location should be within 6 in. of drawing specification per Dwg. M-919 DESCRIPil0N OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Hanger is shown on drawing M-1CC03052R(B) as being located on centerline of Column 16 but is installed 1 ft. plant North of c/1 Column 16. Detail Item 9 installed in reverse to Section A-A drawing 10CO3052R, Rev. B. (Attached) / DI[ N 7'2/'33 PREPARED BY 'FWN, DATE USE SPACE BELOWTO 00CUMENT ANY RE. REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. i SIGNATURE: DATE 8 PAGE 2 op 3 J
i* B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 22885 :007 REVISION O REQbEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEWBY: DATE: REASON (S): Y/f/3 $ AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY: DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING ISINVAllD BY: DATE: REASPN(S): O OlSAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY: ' DATE: f REASON (S): i PAGE 3 o p__E,
SUPPORT NO. HEV. l EM B.R.(l. P.) ~ I SARGENT&gDY M-ICCO3052R g E L.381 '- 6"~ C meaC AGO musT_ Lor i i -}f7 i n g'.. (- ,R.381-O PMt no. 2485:007 NF.-923b(TYR)/(% / _t)7'- race _ Lor. 8 1-i m, s! EL. 379'- ok" ~ -W ll ,/- 7 v -s g; _y l 11.J1da.,M.rok[' 9" ~I~ gu%~' 3 "0. Go ? ; C .F u-G G. 5 4-R f,. - =_ g, I ^ 3's I Yb r
- p. w x
,= & C ? g lg h_6 ( O s E L. 371'-G" h
- d. #MOS 0
Pci ccose re) 0 g_f 3:_f' "o@> l s i U 2 D t
== = = l @O O l o \\ L-2 r,LA O f po^ $,A},,0 ) e i SECTION A-A o
- q...-.,
-..... ~,z.. -----.- - - -- uw c e a E C. REVIEW BYk1blGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. DOU kEVISION ~ > -l y f
- e., GREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT A
- y. h.
3 NI Q}it F F " AGREE" BOX IS CHECKED ADOVE USE SPACE BELOW TO PROVIDE y., lNFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW R ..3 6 COMMITTEE IN CLASSIFYING THE POTENTIAL FlNDING. "..h.
- g
( p. I
- ya OtDISAGREE WITH POTENTI AL FINDING STATEMENT K
l fUSETHE SPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE ADDITIONALINFDBMATION TH iCLARI'FIES THE DIS AGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FINDING STATEME "'IN ADDITION, SUPPLY COPIES OF ANY DOCUMENTATION TH AT S 'a gfulSAGREEl N quSE CTINUATION PAGE FOR Ay0ITIONAL SPACE) . BY:__ l, la ^* DATE: /M M ] .y &p. !;. COMMENTS '.c .- n f. tj
- t.
52 hY ~ v. K pehangerinquestionwasinst'allediaJuneof1982 prier'to-j',
- C
- :the implementation of Cherne' Procedure 12.10, Rev. 4, which re- ,Q quired a QA checklist sign-off. All hangers that were irjhtalled le rior to the procedure revision will be verified on the 4pecklist. n { tin this casc item 4 of the. checklist (Attachmant 2 of CCC' Pro-
- @t
[ cedure.12.10) vill be unacceptable and will generate an NCR in e faccordance with paragraph 5.1.9.2.T of the procedure. TljiNCR-FD {! disposition will. either allow..the hanger to remain as.it %s nr ' '{ t require removal and installation.in its correct location (d.The-j: disposition approval will bel determined by.the li-E who...iir[ turn, .g ?.Millqualifytheresult.
- .y.
.. j.t,
- p%;
- -',
t..n & n .s
- f f-l':
1.k. f .. v. !. y
- c.
- g i,t..
r s .9.1 7 ,. 3,; - 1,.., 3.... . y;. a h. ./ - ,.{ ,,.,. y..;.. p u n, c ) . h.; ' -
- . l. * ?
l.' ,): .c ," ', ),:.j... ' r
- i
'i.; - , c i ;.." ' s G:.. im
- . e;;.
- v..
+.. -m y, : g.: ; s t[ >.. 4{.... c . k.y..t k 0 i 5 . ;3
- y
.y
- n d
I Fy f 9 [.j '
- ~ ~
F-i t L ".,1l. \\' l_ 1 3= q .!, atp .lj j{. 't t , tg;, 4 1, 4 r. 1 l !, ' i l 'sl: i. V l c , p.., :. n.
- f. ?
3, ..i d d h PAGE O OF 6 '*/- f w
O. REVIEW OF GRIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION 2485:007 PFR NO. REVISION
RESPONSE
REVIEW BY TPT INITIATOR IE AGREE WITH 000 -SEND TO FRC O 'AG REE WITH 000 - REVISE O AGREEWITH 000 ' INVALID O DISAGREEWITH 000-S$ND TO FRC (ATTACH RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT) COMMENT: 2 BY: Filiberto Urias [c4(,d b DATE: I-#2-#3 REVIEW BY THE TPT TASK LEADER 9 AGREEWITHINITinTOR O' DISAG REE WITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS) COMMENT: 4 8Y: DATE: 6 0F-8- PAGE
i IMPACT ASSESSMENT s PFR NO. 2485:007 REVISION AFFECTED ITEM: Pipe ICC05G16, Pipe Support 1CC03052R A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR:
- 1. WHICH OF THE FIRST TWO POTENTIAL FINDING CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA APPLIES TO THIS PFR?
10,20
- 2. IN WHATWAY MIGHT A SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARD BE CREATED AS A RESULT OF THE DEVIATION OR ERROR (IF 1 CR 2 ABOVE WAS CHEOGlD)?:
- 3. OTHER COMMENTS:
This PFR relates to a pipe hanger,mislocated by 1 ft. from specified position. The pipe stresses due to this mislocation would not be significantly affected. PREPARED BY: M43 7M M do4I b DATE': f~/d'T7 e / 8.PREPAR TION BYTPTTASK LEADER:
- 1. COMMENT ON ABOVE REPLIES:
k 6 & 6 /4/syy & Tu?70L S 0 H M h W I
- 2. DOES EVIDENCE EXIST OF MULTIPLE SIMILAR DEVIATIONS OR ERRORS?
IF SO, LIST RELEVANT PFR N0'S: 4 .Alede
- 3. IF POTENTIAL FINDING CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA 3,4, OR 5 APPLIES, STATE WHICH ONE:
3 0,4 0,5 O,NONE 121
- 4. WHATIS YOUR JUDGEMENT OF THE LIKEllH000 0F MULTIPLE SIMILAR DEVIATIONS OR ERRORS ACTUALLY CREATING ASUBSTANTIALSAFETY HAZARD-AND OF WHAT NATURE 7 pp,y,mz,, (f ef)//M66e!,S Gwee WmO) SMews'eMAL
- 5. OTHER COMMENTS-1
) 1 PREPARED BY: DATE: 'PAGE' 7 0F ' 8
E. RECOMMENDATION BY FINDINGS ' REVIEW COMMITTEE PFR NO. 3485:007 REVISION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ' 6}t AC W M W A 'le44/A BY: DATE: DEFINITION: OJAEQUATE DINADEQUATE VAllDITY: 15 VALID OlNVALID CLASSIFICATION: C OBSERVATION OFINDING 1 JUSTIFICATION CLASSIFICATION CRITERION NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON "0BSERVATION" O R " FINDING" CLASSif.lCATION: i t BY: DATE: F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER O ACCEPT O REJECT BY: DATE: 8 PAGE 8 0F
j iy M. TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A oison e au.anoio.i.co.. V Auxiliary Building Unit 2 Roof PFR NO 2485:008 AFFECTEDITEM. ' Removable Slab #219P PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Date July 21, 1983 Page 1 of Potential Finding Report Revision Summary i Purpose of issue / Rev..isicn Date Prepared by Sections Changed 7/21/83 F. Lin Original Issue \\ 1 4 ,Ei 4 4 e ? o p 4 F0/A-14 413 L/if l g em'
[ . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:008 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATO R AFFECTED ITEMS: Renovable Slab #219F (Drwg. AB-511) at Ainilin g Building Unit 2 Roof, El. 490, REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Hanger Drwg. AB-511 Drwg. S-754-N ypt y CDAR #6753 CDAR #6792
- L5x9xk BASIC REQUIREMENT: Acceptable engineering practige requires V
and above reference docts: rants show that 2-#4x3'-0 additional bars are to be installed inrndiately above each of the hori-a zontal legs of twols. 5x3xh which are parts of hanger lift j'l box. 'Ihese rebars manid be arranged as shown to the right. . / .. l" J should j-- m DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: 28b 3' & 2-#4x3'_-0" additional bars are installed away and below each of the horizontal legs of two /3. 5x3x on both two budutt hanger lift boxes as shown in Photos 049 through 053. a USE SPACE BELOWTO DOC MENT ANY RE. REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. DATE 7'bD PREPARED BY Y t i t f SIGNATURE: DATE,,- f.', MAhi PAGE P OF-
g-B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 248%008 REVISION O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): M AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY: DATE: D AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVALID BY: DATE: REASON (S): O DISAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): i pans 3 np
e.. j j1 POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUAT.10N PAGE PFR NO. 90RG nnA REVISION .1 IDCATION MAP OF PHOIU PAGE NO. l b'N (PLAMT) k' Removable Slab #219F cn Aux. Bldg. Unit 2 Roof, Elev. 490 4 l ' Photo %wn m 2 *4x3' d' were instal \\ed away and under
ung nnR REVISION l LOCATION MAP OF PHOIO PAGE NO. h Photo shown N'N (PLANT) s l (.NS T Removable Slab #219F on I Aux. Bldg. Unit 2 Roof, Elev. 490 l l 2 *4 = 3'-o" were installed away and below the bottom edge of I \\ horizontal leg angle. \\~ \\ 1 4 l ^} " h[ ,e** R f i &, ; : ;.,:,/_ x.,f l .,r .;c ,/ \\. / i 14 r s' / b. vj ' (. 7 } g ' '<h 4 i, i ]s M f c \\. g s /.., ./ / I l A l g
- g'
.? l O f./'j
- $y.
t .,/p'i g r,
- 4..L i-
,4. / i -{ [,.,(.e/ &(%s) l .x f ,y. ,, y 3 l I,w Horizontal jeg of 'LGx3 x{ l l PH-051 1 DATE: 7-@~N BY: Y / i i BY: DATE: i I a,,, 4 POTENTIAL FINDING PEPORT CONTINUATION PAGE i PFR NO. W5 nn REVISION i $ IDCATION MAP OF PHOIO PAGE NO. Phol-o shown L-+ F'N (PLAk)T) h Q Reravable Slab #219F on i Aux. Bldg. Unit 2 Roof, Elev. 490 i l 2 *4 x 3'-O" / were installed away and 1 : V ). f-below the + 4.... '. - j 1 gy g [U,. 'j u sg":M 14(. botfom edge -"M' . 4 l l ? of horizonial i ?*7 j. g leg angle. .g 3. 7 yy i .e, t g h', Q .;
- f, l
- :. ~
,p - k ~,,i f.7f . fgf - > '. w- .r~ . ;&. p.2,Q Q z,g ~ n. %g r' l p:H j[F3f $7 ? j S M y ,t:. s n; ?- . g 7, "y* .jj' J4 f .;on s ;g yi o. f-f -; g g k. }- } A${#,}- y.$sh i f- -. 7 y s
- 4*.,.,_;.- ;>*. ~ :' msw -.
-2 Horizonbl les of l. 5'xsxt - PH-051. i bY: DATE: 1~ I' O { ! '/ BY: DATE: 1 ry -f.. - POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUAT.10N PAGE IOCATICN MAP OF FHOIO PAGE NO. .h . N ( PLAWT) 's Removable Slab #219F on Aux. Bldg. Unit 2 Boof, Elev. 490' { Photo shown, l i 244 x3'-0" were instolled l away and below the bottom edge of hoHzontal leg angle. ) i , ~ ~ b' N df-i i l r l J ] l j Horizontal leg of 45x3xk VerHeal leg of 45x3*E PH-053 "I-15 ' O BY: DATE: i l BY: DATE: i R+- ~ 4 'f l TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A 0* ision of GA Tuhno!og'es Inc. w e PFR NO.: AFFECTEDITEM: Pipe Support 1CC03052R 2485:007 PROJECT NO.: Ime Date Pg of 2485 July 21. 1983 y Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Purpose of issue / Rev..ision Date Prepared by Sections Changed 7/21/83 F. Urias Original Issue D. '1hilorin (d, 9 O i F4IA-14-213 Lfis b . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:007 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATO R AFFECTED ITEMS: Pipe Support 1CC03052R REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: M-537-2 (L) i W1CC03052R(B) M-919, Sheet 4A, Rev. C BASIC REQUIREMENT: Hanger: location should be within 6 in of drawing specification per Dwg. 5 919 ~ DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Hanger is shown on drawing M-1CC03052R(B) as being located on centerline of Column 16 but is installed 1 ft. plant North of c/1 Column 16. Detail Itan 9 installed in reverse to Section A-A drawing 16CO3052R, Rev. B. (Attached) USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. 7~2['33 b; N DATE PREPARED BY SIGNATURE: DATE' ,.a P PAGE 2 op ~- 'o B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:007 REVISION O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): YY 9l//!r3 ( AGREE POTENTIAL FIN 0 LNG IS VAllD BY: DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): i O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: i REASON (S): l -s. 'I pans 3 nF a = 4- ~~--.-..~m__ ._._..--u. sueeoaT No. Rev. I ~ EM B.R.(1. P.) I SARGENT&LUNDY M-1CCO3052R 3 I 3g l 1_ gl' -
- ~*^-~
333,7 t_o, t Y , E.L.381;-O,, ~, ~ em no. 2485:007 g.1 (- NF.-92B(TYR)q%/ raceJ!or ' t li i %j se h EL 379'-ok" W _l $glil.,li - - ~,..,_ y I,F.! jj U.. t by l yl.-- +g"
- m "=t= s P 9
np 2 --o 3 U i j j. C q ] (_ ca. i) i 16 4-7 N 3 9 i I = 3 's i D ~ (=, & \\ l W_ C " 'l ( C.s E L.371 '-6" .l N. MOV' "o 0 70ccossieo >o A. -i= u ' g g-o s'-o r 2 p ~~ o> ~ I O y t.A o i 6-i I, 8 K T4 SECTION A-A A, Al \\! Q rwi.n /6 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A DNinon of GA Technologin Inc. AFFECTEDITEM: PFR NO.: 2485:005 Design Control System PROJECT NO.:2485 Ime Date " 1 July 21, 1983 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Date Prepared by 3,"cIio[ Chang d m A.D. % GWC 7/21/83 G. W. Chandler original a e Fo/A-S+-zis L.- IG . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:005 REVISION ~ A. PREPARATION BY Tl4 INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Design Control System 3 f REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: (1) ANSI N 45.2.11-1974, Sect. 6.2 (2) ANSI N 45.2.11-1974, Sect 8 BASIC REQUIREMENT: (1) "Where changes to previously verified designs have been made, design verification shall be required for the changes, including evaluation of the effects of those changes on the overall design." (2) " Documented pmcedures shall be provided for design changes to approved design documents including field changes, which assure that the impact of the change is carefully considered....." DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: PSI has delegated design responsibility to Fr.rgent and Inndy; however, PSI has retained certain design review fbnctions. It should be clear who reviews designs for impact and effects of changes. 'Ihis has not been specifi-cally delegated to Sargent and Inndy but rather, delegated in general terms such as the requirement to follow ANSI N 45.2.11. PS1 design review responsi-bilities are not clear as illustrated by the excerpts fr m PSI procedures shown below on this continuation page. (See Continuation Sheet.) USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION SY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. 7b, G. Womb @ DATE PREPARED BY i SIGNATURE: DATE 2 PAGE 0F -_~..- ? POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUAT10N PAGE PFR NO. phRR.nnR REVISION Description of Potential Findint (Continued) PAGE NO. It should be very clear what reviewers are re. dewing for when they sign off changes. One concern is that a Sargent and Inndy er@eer could view a FCr as a "custcmer approved change" and, therefore, not check for effects or impact. EXCERPTS FRCM PSI PROCEDURES PMP 3-1 Para. 2.2 "'Ihe Project Engineering Manager shall be responsible for assuring that documents within the scope of this procedure are in compliance with the applicable codes, standards and licensing comitments." PMP 3-1 Para. 2 3 "'Ihe QE Manager shall be responsible for assuring, when specifically required by this procedure, that documents within the scope of this procedure specify 'the applicable quality requirements." ~ PMP 3-1 Para. 3.1/7 "'Ihe Supervising Engineer may also identify other reviewers..., and assures proper distribution." FUR Review PMP 3-2 2.2 "'Ihe Resident Engineer shall have overall responsibility for the preparation, approval and release cycles of FCRs." FQAM 1 Para. 1.3.12.1.1 " Discipline Engineer responsible for assuring ~ EM technical adequacy of the design." FQAM Eara. 1.3.11.2 " Project Engineering Manager checks FCRs against SAR. PQAM 3.2.6 " PSI reviews and approves non-replicate design base criteria and any changes to replicate design base criteria developed by S&L for safety-related items." MAM 3.3.5 3 "'Ihe technical portions of Procurement Specs X shall be reviewed and approved by PSI...." PQAM 3.3 7.5 "The personnel assigned to the reviews shall have sur-ficient collective knowledge arx1 experience to assure a comprehensive evaluation of the design being reviewed." p2.OM
- 03. W bMArdhbtt BY:
DATE: 8Y: DATE: 3 0F PAGE .? 4 B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 94RG nns REVISION ~ O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): 7,lu /B3 K AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAll0BY.: DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): i O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): i i l pans 4 nF = TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Wsio.uf GA Techn: log;cs Inc. f PFR ND.: AFFECTEDITEM: 2485:005 PROJECT NO.:2485 issue Date July 21, 1983 Page of i y 10 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary "'P. se of Issue / Revision Date Prepar by Sections Changed m A.D b GWC 7/21/8;l G. W. Chandler Original / i F0/A-St-M3 L[t? 4 y 8 . POTENTI AL FINDING REPORT s PFR NO. 2485:005 REVISION ~~~ A. PREPAR ATION BY TFT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Design Control System i ' FM[ REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: (1) ANSI N 45.2.11-1974, Sect. 6.2 (2) ANSI N 45.2.11-1974, Sect 8 BASIC REQUIREMENT: (1) "Where changes to previously verified designs have been made, design verification shall be required for the changes, including evaluation of the effects of those changes on the overall design." (2) " Documented procedures shall be provided for design changes'to approved design documents including field changes, which assure that the impact of the change is carefbily considered....." DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: PSI has delegated design responsibility to Sargent and Inrxlv: however, PSI has retained certain design review fbnctions. l It is not clear who reviews designs for impact and effects of changes. '1his has not been specifi-cally delegated to Sargent aryl Inndy but re9er, delegated in general tenns such as the requirement to follow ANSI N 4t,.2.11. PSI design review responsi-bilities are not c' lear as illustrated by the excerpts from PSI procedures shown below on this continuation page. (See Continuation Sheet.) 4 7/2I!b3 O. W 0 % Ahlbt.ER DATE PREPARED BY USE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. SIGNATURE: DATE 2 PAGE 0F 10 POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT C0i1TINUATl0N PAGE PFR NO. NAS nns REVISION ) Description of Potential Findins!(Continued) PAGE NO. It should be very clear what reviewers are reviewing for when they sign off changes. One concern is that a Sargent and Lundy engineer could view a FCR as a "custmer approved change" and, therefore, not check for effects or impact. EXCERPTS FRCN PSI PROCEDUIES RIP 3-1 Para. 2.2 "The Project Engineering Manager shall be responsible for assuring that documents within the scope of this procedure are in compliance with the applicable codes, standards and licensing comitments." PMP 3-1 Para. 2 3 "The QE Manager shall be responsible for assuring, when specifically required by this procedure, that documents within the scope of this procedure specify the applicable quality requirements." IMP 3-1 Para. 3.1// "The Supervising Engineer may also identify other reviewers...,. and assures proper distribution." FUR Review MIP 3-2 2.2 "The Resident Engineer shall have overall responsibility for the preparation, approval and release cycles of FCRs." IQAM 1 Para. 1.3.12.1.1 " Discipline Engineer responsible for assuring " technical adequacy of the design." IQAM Eara, 1 3 11.2 " Project Engineering Manager checks FURS against SAR. 1 PQAM 3 2.6 " PSI reviews and approves non-replicate design base criteria and any changes to replicate design base criteria developed by S&L for' safety-related items." / 1 IQAM 3 3 5 3 "The technical portions of Procurement Specs shall be reviewed and approved by PSI.. '.." "The personnel a' signed to the reviews shall have sur-PQAM 3.3.7.5 s ficient collective knowledge ard experience to assure a comprehensive evaluation of the design being reviewed." b W. OHe" @6WC. 7/20/83 DATE: BY: 8Y: DATE: PAGE 3 op to a ~ t B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. N1RG 005 REVISION ~ J O REONEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): 7/1i/B3 K AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VALID - BY: DATE: O AGREE PCTENTIAL FINDING ISINVALID BY:. DATE: REASON (S): i O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): h N 10 PAGE OF a 'C. REVIEW BY ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. ; 2485:005 REVISION O AGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT IF " AGREE" BOX IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW COMMITTEE IN CLASSIFYING THE POTENTIAL FINDING. 4 [ DISAGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT USE THE SPACE BELOWT0 P'ROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT CLARIFIES THE DISAGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTI AL FINDING STATE!.1ENT. IN ADDITION, SUPPLY PIES OF ANY DOCUMENTATION THAT EUPPORTS DISAGR T. Do ONT UATION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) N 8.,- 7 &<u= M DATE: COMMENTS PSI has delegated design functions for the Project to the Design Contractors / Subcontractors, including 'the Design Verification functions identified in ANSI N45.2.11-1974 and as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.64, Revision 2, dated June, j i 1976. This delegation is documented in the Project Quality Assurance Program Manual, Section 3, Design Control, Articles 3.2 and 3.3.7 and incl _udes Design Reviews as an acceptable method of Design.Verif! cation. Project Engineering has retained no Design Review functions, as the term is defined in ANSI N45.2.11-1974, for those designs performed by the Design Contractor / Subcontractor; but rather performs Engineering Reviews to verify compliance of the Design Contractor / Subcontractor to their approved Design Control program and to ensure that design activities are carried out in a planned, controlled and orderly manner. These Engineering Reviews are performed as one of the ways PSI meets its Owner and N-Certificate Holder responsibilities for design activities. r The present Section 3 of the PQAM, Revision 3 " Design Control" 3 has been~noted to contain inappropriate references to "dtsign reviews" which are to be performed by Project Engineering. / i These instances have been identified and the PQAM revision to eliminate these references, and substitute the term " Engineering Review", which is more descriptive of the intent and philosophy i of Project Engineering, will be issued shortly. I Design changes are accomplished in accordance with approved Sargent & Lundy, Vestinghouse Power Reactor Division, and Public Service Indiana procedures which adequately address the Design Change Control process and meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.11-1974. Field Change Requests (FCRs) are forwarded to the l appropriate Design Contractor / Subcontractor for review in j j accordance with PMP 3-2 paragraph 3.1.2 and are reviewed in I accordance with the Design Contractor / Subcontractor's Quality Assurance Program requirements. The Design Contractor / Subcontractor procedures governing these reviews are l PAGE 5 0F 11 w 1 POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUAT10N PAGE l PFR NO. 9489 009 REVISIO?i o PAGE NO. 1: Sargent & Lundy procedure F1-MH-017 " Site Design Control" 2. Westinghouse procedure SEED 1.9 " Field Change Request Procedure - Marble Hill" i 4 i 4 f / I 1 I ) ['N ~ -<=* DATE: BY: DATE: l 6 10 ~ PAGE 0F {- n j ....m D. REVIEW 0F ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION ,485:005 PFR NO. REVISION
RESPONSE
REVIEW BY TPT INITIATOR O AGREEWITH 000-SEND TO FRC O ' AGREE WITH 000 - REVISE D AGREEWITH ODO aINVALID O OlSAGREEWITH 000-SEND TO FRC (ATTACH RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT) COMMENT: The written response by the ODO was not entirely adequate. The response only included plans to change the PQAM which contains inappropriate reference s to design reviews. After review of the OLO response, a telephone conversation was' held with Mr. Nicodemus of PSI. In that conversation Mr. Nicodemus indicated that the procedure on PSI reviews of FCR's could also be clarified..Mr. Nicodemus stated he would initiate action to change the procedure regarding PSI engineering reviews of FCR's. Making the change will clarify the responsibilities in the design review process.
- M DAT'E:
f/ 3 ^ BY: REVIEW BY THE TPT TASK LEADER ~ 3 AGREEWITHINITIATOR O DISAGREE WITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS) l COMMENT: It appears from a review of the ODO response and the phone conversa-tion that there are (were) inappropriate references to design reviews in the PQAM. PSI has recognized that by making changes to the procedures they would clarify the responsibilities in the design review process. r e \\ 1 S* 8 /15 / 8 3 BY: DATE: (/ PAGE 7 0F 10
~... TORREY d[ PINES TECHNOLOGY A Divib'ON OF 408e(14AL A70Mac COMPANT CONTACT REPORT TELEPHONE' '; ceorge chandler 8 12/83 DATE CONTACTED By l DI Pa mt MENT SueJtCT e Lowell Nickodemus 812-289-3000 NAML 181LC TELtPHONC i Public Service Indiana X 1414 Cow >ANY oCPARTMENT t a1(NSCN _ Marble Hill, Indiana Indiana l Accaiss Cal v stata o1Mt MS CONI ACT &D t SU.P.ARY Hr. Nie demus and I discussed where we agree and where we disagree on the PFR and PSI's response. Lovell read portions of Sargentand Lundy's procedure PI-MH-017 which satisfied my concern about the purpose of S&L's design review of FCR's. 7 Another area of concern that was discussed was the adequacy of PSI's description of the purpece of PSI'c review of FCR's. PSI plans to change the PQAM which contains i nn nn enn e t n e r.
- v. f o r e.m.,, en deaien reviews and Lowell stated he would also initiate actio to change the procedure regarding PSI engineering reviews of FCR's.
l l d a ACTIO!IREQUIRED None I e-None l DATE ACTION REQUIRED Page 8 of 10 O
.i I E. RECOMMENDATION BY FINDINGS REVIEW COMMITTEE PFR NO. 2485:005 REVISIOb ADDITipNAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY: DATE: DEFINITION: OADEQUATE DINA0 EQUATE VAllulTY: O ALID OlNVAllD CLASSIFICATION: OBSERVATION OFINDING JUSTIFICATION CLASSIFICATION CRITERl0N NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON "0BSERVATION" OR " FINDING" CLASSIFICATION: i i e l BY: DATE: F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER O ACCEPT O REJECT BY: DATE: Pact 9 nr 10.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT PFR NO. 2485:005 REVISION AFFECTE0lTEM: Design Control System A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR:
- 1. WHICH OF THE FIRST TWO POTENTIAL FINulNG CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA APPLIES TO THIS PFR7 1 0,2 (3
- 2. IN WHAT WAY MIGHT A SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZAR0 BE CREATED AS A RESULT OF THE DEVIATION OR ERROR (IF 1 OR 2 ABOVE WAS CHECIED)?:
An FCR might not receive the proper review for impact and affects of the change.
- 3. OTHER COMMENTS:
4 @ [6/ N DATEi N3 PREPARED BY: l B. PREPARATION BY TPT TASK LEADER:
- 1. COMMENT ON ABOVE REPLIES:
The procedures as written were not very clear as to who had what responsibility for reviewing for impact and effects a FCR might h tve. [AIChY YKf
- 2. DOES EVIDENCE EXIST OF MULTIPLE SIMILAR DEVIATIONS OR EFSOR$7 pgg4vts-n IF S0, LIST RELEVANT PFR N0'S:
N/A V jg/f f[s
- 3. IF POTENTIAL FINDING CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA 3,4, OR 5 APPLIES, STATE WHICH ONE:
3 0,4 0,5 0,NONE III
- 4. WHAT IS YOUR JUDGEMENT OF THE LIKEllH000 0F MULTIPLE SIMILAR DEVIATIONS OR ERRORS ACTUALLY CREATING A SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARD - AND OF WHAT NATURE 7 There is little likelihood of multiple similar deviations.
- 5. 0THER COMMENTS:
None j N480 O b* DATE: 8/IS/03 PREPARED BY: V PAGE 10 0F 10
g TORREY P!NES TECHNOLOGY n oi*un a cuannes.am. PFR NO.: AFFECTEDITEM: 2485:006 QA JOS/ POSITION DESCRIPTIONS PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Date 7/20/83 Page 1 of 7 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision , Date Prepared by 3,"cti ' Cha g d 7/20/83 B. L. Coleman Original M@ d'u BtC, O e 9 e e dp 9 e e 9 + 4 0 Fo/A-tv-293 O C
i . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT 2485:006 REVISION PFR NO. A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATO R AFFECTED ITEMS: Position / Job Descriptions for personnel in the PSI QA Department. REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: 10CFR50, Appendix B, ANSI N45.2, and good management practice. BASIC REQUIREMENT: The reference documents discuss the need for personnel performing activities affecting quality to be proficient in their duties in order to accomolish the. work in an adequate manner. Position descriptions are commonly used to ~ accurately reflect the specific 2 types of knowledge, skill, and experience required for each position. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Job / Position Descriptions for PSI QA manageinent personnel appear to be deficient for the following reasons: I a) Current " Position Descriptions" do not identify the minimum qualifications, ) such as education, experience, certifications, etc. req' ired for.various u QA management positions. (Position descriptions examined include the y Audit Manager and Supt-Qual _ity Administration.)
- 3 PREPARED BY DATE USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT.
'1 SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 0F 7
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGC PFR NO. 2$..A DEVIS10M PAGE NO. b) 2e proposed " Job Descriptions," which are only in the review phase c:id are not yet official, do establish minimum education and experience requirerents for QA management positions. However, based en these mini:r.um requirenn:s, and a review of the qualification files of four present QA many,ers, it -appears that three of these managers ao not meet the proposed education requirements for their respective positions. Bey are the Quality Engin=er- 'ing Manager, Audit Manager, and Quality Administration Supervisor. he proposed Job Descriptions examined require a BS or AS deg:ve and 10/8 years experience, both in a related discipline. Eere appears to be na definition as to what constitutes a related BS deg"ee, or related experience. 'IWo of the three individuals occupying the above positions do not have ca;; type of degree, and the third has a degree in a discipline that does not <a appear to be related (Pre-Med/ Psychology). 'c) he qualification folder for one of the above QA managers without a degree contains a memo that states that his education has been evaluated as equivalent to an AS Degree per W,P. 3 01, Para. 5.2.3; however, the proposed Job Description does not provide for " equivalency" and the WP could not be located by the TPT team. d) Approved Position Descriptions could not be located for the Quality Ergineer-ing Manager, Quality Assurance Officer, nor QA Executive Director. i NO % h 810-7h5 /A3 DATE: BY: V BY: DATE: 1 l 4' PAGE 3 0F s. e
B. RE'llEN ev TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:006 REVISION O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: R EASON(S): N O bda^> 7!25)b3 AGREE POTENTI AL FINDING IS VALID B_Y.: DATE: s y O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVALID BY: DATE: REASON (S): / ' O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): / t ...PAGE 4 0 F._ L._
\\ C. REVIEW BY ORIGINAL DESIGM ORGA.NIZATION NR NO._Plii 'M REVISION O AGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINCING STATEMENT IF " AGREE" BOX IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW i COMMITTEE IN CLASSIFYING THE POTENTIAL FINDING. E DISAGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT USE THE SPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT CLARIFIES THE D!SAGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT. ~ IN ADDITION, SUPPLY MPIES OF ANY DOCUMFNTATION THATSUPPORTS DISAGREEMENT.(USE CONTINUATION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) I d b DATE: AIo f? /788 BY: CT A / g(,g. /9048/ o4 The(.epresentlyisnota / 5 JTM COMMENTS a&b Regulatory Requirement for the development of " Job Descriptions". As noted in paragraph (b) of the " Description of Potential Finding", the Position Descriptions (including the Quality Engineering Manager) are not yet approved, and are presently being reviewed by P.S.I. management. This review includes an evaluation of the minimum requirements for the positions and for inclusion of equivalencies where appropriate. d The position of Quality Assurance Officer has been replaced by the Executive Director-Nuclear Quality Assurance. The position description and minimum qualifications for this individual are delineated in Sections I and II of P.S.I.'s Project Quality Assurance Manual (PQAM). Therefore, based on the above, a deficiency does not exist at this time. c In addition to the above, PMP 3.01 has been deleted and PMP 10-1 and 18-2 now delineate the qualification / certification requirements for these positions. Also, identified in these procedures are "equ'. valent requirements" that may utilized when qualifying personnel. f.Ly>ca -rL Af 10, i983- ~ ftA Wy y PAGE 5 0F 7 L ~ ~ z.
Q D. REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. 2485:006 REVISION
RESPONSE
REVIEW BY TPT INITIATOR O AGREEWITH 000-SEND TO FRC O ' AGREE WITH 000 - REVISE [AGREEWITH 000 'INVAllD D DISAGREEWITH 000-SEND TO FRC (ATTACH RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT) COMMENT: Response is acceptable. l \\ i P 0,!#,!83 r~ DATE: BY: ^ REVIEW BY THE TPT TASK LEADER e )Q AGREEWITHINITIATOR O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS) COMMENT: None. WII 03' M O-J DATE: BY: - V PAGE _fL OF _1_
1 E. RECOMMENDATION BY plNDINGS 2485:005 REVIEW COMMITTEE PFR NO. REVISION r ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED o o BY: DATE: DEFINITION: OADEQUATE ~OINADEQUATE VAllDITY: O VALID OINVAllD CLASSIFICATION: O DBSERVATION OFINDING " JUSTIFICATION ~ CLASSIFICATION CRITERION NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON "0BSERVATION" OR " FINDING" CLASSIFICATION: i l r s' i BY: DATE: F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER O ' ACCEPT O REJECT BY: DATE: PAGE 7 0F 7
fh TOHREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A DMsion of GA Tec ciegics in: PFR NO.:2485:004 External Interfaces AFFECTEDITEM: PROJECT f 0.: issue Da;e Page of 2485 July 20, 1983 y g Potential finding Report Revision Summary P ' ' Revision Date Prepared by 3,",'tions Ct sed 7/@$3 7/20/83 K. Baylor. Original e e 9 e 4 e O O e e ',e ? e 9 fo /A MS L[li K* n O e n y
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:004 REVISION ~ i A. PREPARATION BY TFT INITIATOR AFFECTEDITEMS- ) External interfacie activities and ccumunication affecting quality of design. REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: 1. ANSI N45.2.11-1974, Sect. 5.1, Attachments A and B. 2. PSI Project Quality Assurance Manual, Sect. 2.2.5 BASIC REQUIREMENT: /- 'Ihe external interfaces between organizations providing criteria, designs, specifications, and technical dilection shall be identified in writing. 'Ihe responsibilities for these organizations may be set forth in tabular fonn or flow charts acccrnpanied by appropriate text to. clarify the intent (Ref.1). ,q y 'Ihe PQAM requires descriptions of interfaces ar:eng external organizations 4 (Ref. 2). [ ESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: ' Die external interfaces between design organizations are given in fragmentary form in individual specifications for design and construction work, in individual reports on scope of work, and in the PSI-W-S&L Interface Control Agreement of 5/24/82. However, there are no descriptive material, tables or flow charts which define a ccanplete picture of the complex interrelationships, including ccumunication and responsibilities, between PSI, S&L AND W AND THEir sub-contractors. External interfaces beccme particularly impImtant in view of the fact that PSI perfoms no design work; any construction design changes (Continued) M!N PREPARED BY - v v g DATE l USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR DN THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. t SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 0F a
4 POTENTIAL FINDlHG REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE PFR NO. 248% 004 REVISIOff ~ (continued from~Section A.) PAGE NO. 1 requested by the PSI contractors are transmitted by PSI to S&L for design review, approval, and return via PSI to the contracting organization. i o 1 .~ f ~ 4M DATE: oldi OE3 ~ BY: V F v ( BY: DATE: PAGE l 0F 8
l B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485: 004-REVISION - O REQbESTINITIATOR TO RE. REVIEW BY: DATE: I REASON (S): AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAll0 BY: M
- O-7/20/B3 DATE:
v O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DAT5: REASON (S): j i O DISACREEWITH INITIATOR .BY: DATE: REASON (S): 0 1 4 8 PAGE 0F
C. REVIEW BY ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION PFR NO. 2480004 REVISION O AGREE WITH POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT IF" AGREE" BOX IS CHECKED ABOVE USE SPAC'E BELOWTO PROVIDE i INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BE USEFUL TO THE FINDINGS REVIEW COMMITTEE IN CLASSIFYING THE POTENTIAL FINDING. l# DISAGREE WITH POTENTI AL FINDING STATEMENT USETHESPACE BELOWTO PROVIDE ADDITIONALINFORMATION THAT CLARIFIES THE DISAGREEMENTWITH THE POTENTIAL FINDING STATEMENT. IN ADDITION, SUPPLY C IES OF ANY DOCUMENTATION THATSUPPORTS DISAGRE iE SE' ONTI UATION PAGE FOR ADDITIONALSPACE) b-" b -O DATE: B COMMENTS n External design interfaces, responsibilities and lines of communication between Public Service Indiana and its Design Contractors are adequately established by: 1. Sargent & Lundy Scope of Work, Revision 8, dated 2/3/83 2. Sargent & Lundy Project Instruction PI-MH-026 " Outline,of Procedure", Revision A, dat.ed 12/21/82 3. NSSS Design Interface Agreement for the Marble Hill Station (Reference PSI Memo PER-1420-83 dated 5/25/83) 4. Interface Control' Agreement West house Piping and Structural Evaluation Program for the Marble Hill Station, Revision 0, dated 5/24/82 External design interfaces, responsibilities and lines of Communication between the Archit.ect/ Engineer Sargent & Lundy, and Suppliers / Contractors are adequately established by Y-Specifications and Quality Assursace Specifications imposed contractually during procurement. Suppliers of Westinghouse NSSS Components have these attributes determined by Westinghouse Specifications and contractual requirements. These relationships are demonstrated by the attached Design Interfaces Chart. Further, the referenced paragraph 2.2.5 of the Project Quality Assurance Manual does not state the need or requi,rement_for descriptions of interfaces among external organizations, but rather states the Manual describes these interfaces. 5 PAGE 0F 8 L .e e
L Interfacing D cuments - Suppliera Contractora Y Specifications sammme amene ammes q s# W Contract Documents a Interfacing Documents - Design Contractors sesse seses assea,asas S&L Scope of Work; Outline of Procedure NSSS Design Interface Agreement"; Interface mannansananiananna......... Control Agreement Westinghouse Piping and Structural Evaluation Program sessa ssais assis assis sis. iises 3 PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA ~,, a.ssssssssssssssssssses sessssssssssssssssi 3 isssssssssssssaansassesssssssssssssssssssy 2, = I t m a o m o 5 3 3 = SARGENT & LUNDY WESTINGHOUSE m; WRD m. W-m i a: n. b, N. Y. a l 1; E i r. i m: J NSSS _W SUPPLIERS SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS,
t D. REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION 2435:004 p REVISIC"
RESPONSE
?, REVIEW BY TPT INITIATOR O AGREEWITH 000-SEND TO FRC O ' AGREE WITH 000 - REVISE G AGREE WITH ODO ' INVALID O DISAGREEWITH 000-SIND TO FRC (AliACH RECORD OF DISCUSSION OF DISAGREEMENT) ll COMMENT: The ODO response clarifies the external design.in,terface, functional responsibilities, and lines of comunication. ANSI N45.2.11-1975, Sect. 5.1 does not specify where or how the external interfaces, functional responsibilities, and lines of comunication shall be identified and described. Sect. 5.1 and Attachments A & B to it merely suggest how it may be set forth. M d DATE: BY: V y REVIEW BY THE TPT TASK LEADER {,M s t @y ui f
- ))-
fj E AGREEWITH INITIATOR. ( gg ')[ T4 O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR (SEE COMMENTS) bk\\2.c' COMMENT: None QT. ! fd4 BY: MO- ~ DATE: O/l /O V 0
- PAGE, OF
4 E. RECOMMENDATION BY FINDINGS 2485:004 REVIEW COMMITTEE PFR NO. REVISION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED e i BY: DATE: DEFINITION: OADEQUATE OlNADEQUATE VALIDITY: O VALID OlNVAllD CLASSIFICATION: O DBSERVATION OFINDING JUST!FICATION CLASSIFICATION CRITERl0N NO. RESULTING IN " FINDING" COMMENT ON " OBSERVATION" OR " FIND!NG" CLASSIFICATION: l i / 7 BY: DATE: l F.TPT PROJECT MANAGER D ACCEPT O REJECT BY: DATE: PAGE-8 0F 8
rs TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technologies Inc. AFFECTE0lTEM: PFR NO.: 2485:006 QA JOB / POSITION DESCRIPTIONS PROJECT NO.: '2485 issue Date 7/20/83 Page 1 of 4 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary "'E 5' 8I I'5"'I Revision Date Prepared by Sections Changed 7/20/83 B. L. Coleman Original M6D D 00 i l 1 / F#/A-84-2.is L/** 6 e- ~. . ~,,-
rp . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:006 REVISION ~ A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Position / Job Descriptions for personnel in the PSI QA Department. REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: 10CFR50, Appendix B, ANSI N45.2, and good management practice. I BASIC REQUIREMENT: The reference documents discuss the need for personnel performing activities affecting quality to be proficient in their duties in order to accomplish the work in an adequate manner. Position descriptions are coninonly used to accurately reflect the specific:. types of knowledge, skill, and experience required for each position. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Job / Position Descriptions for PSI QA management personnel appear to be deficient for the following reasons: a) Current " Position Descriptions" do not identify the minimum qualifications, such as education, experience, certifications, etc. req' ired for various u QA management positions. (Position descriptions examined include the Audit Manager and Supt-Quality. Administration.) USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT.
- 3 PREPARED BY DATE SIGNATURE:
DATE l
- u..
PAGE 2 0F 4
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUAT.10N PAGE 4 PFR NO. 2485:006 REllSION -,c,,.,- PAGE NO. b) 'Ibe proposed " Job Descriptions," which are only in the review phase and are not yet official, do establish minimum education and experience requirements for QA management positions. However, based on these ednimum requiremnts, and a review of the qualification files of four present QA managers, it appears that three of these managers do not meet the proposed education requirements for their respective positions. E ey are the Quality Engineer-ing Manager, Audit Manager, and Quality Administration Supervisor. h e proposed Job Descriptions examined require a BS_or AS degree and 10/8 years experience, both in a related discipline. B ere appears to be no definition as to what constitutes a related BS degree, or related experience. Two of the three individuals occupying the above positions do not have any type of degree, and the third has a degree in a discipline that does not appear to be related (Pre-Med/ Psychology). c) Ee qualification folder for one of the above QA managers without a degree contains a memo that states that his education has been evaluated as equivalent to an AS Degree per PMP 3 01, Para. 5 2 3; however, the proposed Job Description does not provide for " equivalency" and the PMP could not be located by the TPT team, d) Approved Position Descriptions could not be located for the Quality Engineer-ing Manager, Quality Assurance Officer, nor QA Executive Director. 1 b h 8l O-7/25 /A3 BY: DATE: v BY: DATE: PAGE OF x.u. a.
s L, B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 2485:006 REVISION - O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: 3 REASON (S): bM1 7/25)b3 AGPEE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY.: DATE: O AGRCE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): l e O DISAGREEWITHINITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): . pans 4 n p f. __ y_
?! o TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY a ow.i...t or1.ca i i ine. E AFFECTEDITEM: l PFR NO.:2485:004 Exterrn1 Intsrfaces PROJECT NO.: Ime Date 2485 July 20. 1983 1-Potentia! Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Date Prepared by g,"cti ns Cha g 7/o?oga 7/20/8:1 K. Baylor Origirni 4 i f d Fo/A -r+-19 s LW
i l . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 2485:004 REVISION ~ A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATO R AFFECTED ITEMS: External interface activities and ccrmunication affecting quality of design. REQ'JIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: 1. ANSI N4,5.2.11-1974, Sect. 5.1, Attachments A and B. 2. PSI Project Quality Assurance Manual, Sect. 2.2.5 BASIC REQUIREMENT: The external interfaces between organizations providing criteria, designs, specifications, and technical direction shall be identified in writing. The responsibilities for these organizations may be set forth in tabular fom or flow charts acccupanied by appropriate text to clarify the intent (Ref.1). She PQAM requires descriptions of interfaces among external organizations (Ref. 2). DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: '1he external interfaces between design organizations are given in fragmentary form in individual specifications for design and construction work, in individual reports on scope of work, and in the PSI-W-S&L Interface Control Agreement of 5/24/82. However, there are no descriptive material, tables or flow charts which define a ccrnplete picture of the complex interrelationships, including , camonication and iesponsibilities, between PSI, S&L AIO W AND THEir sub-contractors. External interfaces beccrne particularly important in view of the fact that PSI perfoms no design work; any construction design changes (Continued) USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT. PREPARED BY DATE 'k>/N v v VW SIGNATURE: DATE PAGE 2 op e.1
9 POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE P N O. 248% 004 REVISION ~ I i (continued from Section A.) PAGE NO. requested by the PSI contractors are transmitted by PSI to S&L for design review, approval, and return via PSI to the contracting organization. i f U d> O O BY: DATE-v v v( BY: DATE: PAGE._3 OF-y y. a ~__
1 B. REVIEWBY TASK LEADER PFR NO. 248 SIN 4-REVISION - ~ O REQUEST INITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: 1 REASON (S): I AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAll0 BY: M ' O-2o/63 DATE: v O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): i O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: REASON (S): N "df ^- PARF OF =
if TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A 0ivision cf GA Technologies inc. 4 PFR NO.: AFFECTEDITEM: 001 pesich191 trent Fmm1 Systm Susnur Of, issus Date July 14, 1983 Page 7 of PROJECT NO.: 2485 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary urp se of lasue/ ] Revision Date Prepared by Sections Changed 7/14/83 C. Beal Original 4 9 / ,t p - n - t t ' y6, 4 o o o / r -y DA - .M -+ FotA -st ats L{n j e e
. POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 001 REVISION Pedract 2.4R9 A. PREPARATION BY TPT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Residual Heat Removal System Reference Cherne ISO 78402M B009 Field Weld 3 Line 2RHolBA-12" REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: (1) ASME CODE Section V, 1977 Edition, Winter 1977 Addenda (2) Cherne Radiographic Procedure 14.6 BASIC REQUIREMENT:. Accepted practice is that regardless of Penetrameter Sensitivity, if film or source movement occurs during exposure, imeasurable geanetric factors can occur causing a loss of sensitivity in area of interest resulting in reradiography being required. J DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Film movement occurred during exposure resulting in double $ mage. l -l USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION 8Y INITIATOR ON THIS POTENT FI ING REPORT. 1 PREPARED BY DATE 1 SIGNATURE: DATE ~ PAGE S2 op 1. .i; J,.I[I. ,,1 4,
L: B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. NI REVISION PetsseLT 2.465 n. O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: i l ~1 REASON (S): l l l i BY: M O-DATE: 7/I4fS MAGREE POTENTIAL FINDIFG IS VAll0 ~BY: DATE: V O AGREE POTE.'!TIAL FINDulG IS INVALID REASON (S): i I s v O DISAGREEWITHIN;TIATOR BY: DATE: J 9 ),f:.. REASON (S): W i. ,a .:e _
~ ,3 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY A Division of GA Technologies Inc. PFR NO.: AFFECTEDITEM: 002 Auxiliary Feedwater System S w py PROJECT NO.: 2485 lasue Date July 14, 1983 Page 1 of Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Date Prepared by 3,"gti ns C 'P ' ed 7/14/83 C. Bea Original / i. l } i l Fe/A-84-293 L[33 4 i e t. ..e
.,o . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT PFR NO. 002 REVISION PitoTECT 2.48.S A. PREPARATION BY TFT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITE,MS: Auxiliary Feedwater System Reference Cherne ISO #78401 AFB 011 Shop Weld A Line 1AF02DA 4 Spool IE-05-81x REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: ASME Code Section V, 1974 Edition, Sunrner 1976 Addenda. I'IT Grinnell Radiographic Procedure RTP-1-2A BASIC REQUIREMENT: Per Para. T-236 of ASME Section V Weld Identification shall not obscure the area of interest. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Zone location markers are located on weld in area of interest. i USE SPACE BELOW TO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS P EN 1 L F ING REPORT. I'N'b PREPARED BY DATE SIGNATURE: DATE 1 I N -- PAGE 2 0F
'*3
- 8. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO.
N REVISION - O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): )K AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD BY.: M*C _ b + > DATE: 7/I+IB3 O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): 1 O DISAGREEWITH INITIATOR BY: DATE: e REASON (S):, 9 b
- G).-
% :s ' ryyra13am m.
t s / TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY mi.i.a oi on.cnnoio.i. ine. PFR NO.: AFFECTEDITEM: 003 Shop Weld Perfonned at I?" Grinnell g g PROJECT NO.: 2485 issue Date 7/14/83 Page of y 5 Potential Finding Report Revision Summary Revision Date Prepared by 3,f,E
- gns C a ged
~ 7/14/83 c. Be original l F0/ A-14-193 L/2.t
r-e a
w ,m 4, ,._r c.m,-
i g i e ,s . POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT I PFR NO. 2485:003 REVISION A. PREPARATION BY TFT INITIATOR AFFECTED ITEMS: Shop Welds Made at ITP Grinnell Auxiliary Feedwater 1AF02EB 4" W-05-26X 1-4-2-2/1-1-1-7 c-532 Orinnell Auxiliary Feedwater 1AF02EB-4" m-05-28x 1-4-2-2/1-1-1-7 c-150 Grinnell - Auxiliary Feedwater 1AF02EB-4" W-05-28X 1 4-2-2/1-1-1-7 c-520 Grinnell REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: ASME Code Section IX BASIC REQUIREMENT: Per. Para. QW 301.2 of ASME Sec. IX, welder ralst be qualified to weld to company weld procedure specifications. DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: Available records do not demonstrate that Grinnell's welders are qualified to the weld procedures called out on the shop traveler. It appears that Grinnell's Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS) include several essential variables, which would nomally require a separate WPS. However, in lieu of a separate WPS, several Procedure Qualification Records (PQR) were made for each WPS. Each PQR establishes the essential variables for each process. The concern stems frcra the way weld procedures are called out on shop travelers. She master WPS is noted with no reference to the applicable PQR which delineates USE SPACE BELOWTO DOCUMENT ANY RE REVIEW ACTION BY INITIATOR ON THIS POTENT L FI ING REPORT. (see continuation page) PREPARED BY b DATE l SIGNATURE: DATE l j PAGE 2 0F e-
f POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT CONTINUATION PAGE PFR NO. 001 REVISION ~ Peo:ra.r 2.46S ~ PAGE NO. the essential variables. 'Ihis mehtod of documentation results in the inability to determine if welders are qtalified. w / s. BY: DATE: BY: DATE: PAGE D OF ' l' ' ' '
f B. REVIEW BY TASK LEADER PFR NO. Ob5 REVISION - O REQUESTINITIATOR TO RE REVIEW BY: DATE: REASON (S): 7h4/05 [ AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS VAllD Bf: bl b "r7> DATE: O AGREE POTENTIAL FINDING IS INVAllD BY: DATE: REASON (S): l O OlSAGREEWITH IN8TIATOR BY: DATE: REASO,N(S): s '? I-PAnp - nF. .}}